Rationale and design of the AMULET study: A new Model of telemedical care in patients with heart failure

The present and future of cardiological telemonitoring in Europe: a statement from seven European countries

Cardiovascular diseases remain one of the leading causes of death worldwide, placing a significant burden on individuals, families and healthcare systems. Telemedicine, in particular remote monitoring of patients with cardiovascular diseases, reduces this burden as it links the continuous monitoring of the health status with individual education and adaptation of the therapy to the needs of the patients. This improves patient outcomes and facilitates access to specialised healthcare services, independent of time and distance. Furthermore, telemedicine enables improvements in efficiency and promotes patients' self-care. However, the widespread adoption of remote patient monitoring faces several hurdles. A round table of experts from seven European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Spain, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom) reviewed the current state of telemedicine within the participating countries in order to learn from each other with an impetus for European co-operation. The creation of reliable regulations, overcoming regional differences, the redefinition of roles and processes, the personalisation of healthcare services, the promotion of innovation and research, the use of artificial intelligence and, finally, the efficient management and safeguarding of healthcare data were identified as key levers for further development of telemedicine. This discussion paper emphasises the need for cross-national research activities, involving all stakeholders, such as researchers, industry and patients, to foster the integration of telemedicine in clinical pathways.

Health-related quality of life and self-care in heart failure patients under telecare-insights from the randomized, prospective, controlled AMULET trial

Introduction

The growing population of heart failure (HF) patients places a burden on the healthcare system. Patient-centered outcomes such as health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and self-care behaviors are key elements of modern HF management programs. Thus, optimized strategies to improve these outcomes are sought.

Purpose

To assess the effects of a new model of medical telecare on HRQoL and self-care in patients with HF (the AMULET study).

Methods

The study was prospective, randomized, open-label, and controlled with two parallel groups: telecare and standard care. In the telecare group, HF nurses performed patient clinical assessments with telemedical support by a cardiologist and provided education focused on the prevention of HF exacerbation. In the standard care group, patients were followed according to standard practices in the existing healthcare system. At the baseline and at 12 months, HRQoL was assessed using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire and the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLwHF). The level of self-care was assessed with the 12-item standardized European Heart Failure Self-care Behavior Scale (EHFScBS-12).

Results

In the overall study group, 79% of the subjects were male, the mean age was 67 ± 14 years, and 59% of the subjects were older than 65 years of age. The majority of the subjects (70%) had a left ventricular ejection fraction below 40%. After 12 months, statistically significant increases in physical component of the SF-36 (43.3 vs. 47.4 for telecare vs. 43.4 vs. 46.6 for standard care) and mental component of SF-36 (58.4 vs. 62 for telecare vs. 60.4 vs. 64.2 for standard care) were noted, with no intergroup differences. However, patients receiving telecare showed improvement in specific domains, such as physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. There was a significant decrease in MLwHF (29 vs. 35.0; lower is better) at follow-up for both groups. Telecare patients had a statistically significant decrease in EHFScBS-12 (lower is better) at 12 months.

Conclusion

AMULET outpatient telecare, which is based on nurse-led non-invasive assessments supported by specialist teleconsultations, improved the HRQoL and self-care of HF patients after an episode of acute HF.

Telemedicine and patients with heart failure: evidence and unresolved issues

BACKGROUND

Heart failure is the leading cause of cardiac-related hospitalizations. Limited access to reevaluations and outpatient appointments restricts the application of modern therapies. Telemedicine has become an essential resource in the healthcare system because of its countless benefits, such as higher and more frequent appointments and faster titration of medications. This narrative review aimed to demonstrate the evidence and unresolved issues related to the use of telemedicine in patients with heart failure. No studies have examined heart failure prevention; however, several studies have addressed the prevention of decompensation with positive results. Telemedicine can be used to evaluate all patients with heart failure, and many telemedicine platforms are available. Several strategies, including both noninvasive (phone calls, weight measurement, and virtual visits) and invasive (implantable pulmonary artery catheters) strategies can be implemented. Given these benefits, telemedicine is highly desirable, particularly for vulnerable groups. Although some questions remain unanswered, the development of new technologies can complement remote visits and improve patient care.

Telemedicine for the treatment of heart failure: new opportunities after COVID-19

ABSTRACT

During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the epidemiology of heart failure significantly changed with reduced access to health system resources and a worsening of patients' outcome. Understanding the causes of these phenomena could be important to refine the management of heart failure during and after the pandemic. Telemedicine was associated with an improvement in heart failure outcomes in several studies; therefore, it may help in refining the out-of-hospital care of heart failure. In this review, the authors describe the changes in heart failure epidemiology during the COVID-19 pandemic; analyse available evidence on use and benefit of telemedicine during the pandemic and prepandemic periods; and discuss approaches to optimize the home-based or outpatient heart failure management in the future, beyond the pandemic.

Telemedicine Support for Primary Care Providers versus Usual Care in Patients with Heart Failure: Protocol of a Pragmatic Cluster Randomised Trial within the Brazilian Heart Insufficiency with Telemedicine (BRAHIT) Study

Heart failure is a prevalent condition and a frequent cause of hospital readmissions and poor quality of life. Teleconsultation support from cardiologists to primary care physicians managing patients with heart failure may improve care, but the effect on patient-relevant outcomes is unclear. We aim to evaluate whether collaboration through a novel teleconsultation platform in the Brazilian Heart Insufficiency with Telemedicine (BRAHIT) project, tested on a previous feasibility study, can improve patient-relevant outcomes. We will conduct a parallel-group, two-arm, cluster-randomised superiority trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio, with primary care practices from Rio de Janeiro as clusters. Physicians from the intervention group practices will receive teleconsultation support from a cardiologist to assist patients discharged from hospitals after admission for heart failure. In contrast, physicians from the control group practices will perform usual care. We will include 10 patients per each of the 80 enrolled practices (n = 800). The primary outcome will be a composite of mortality and hospital admissions after six months. Secondary outcomes will be adverse events, symptoms frequency, quality of life, and primary care physicians' compliance with treatment guidelines. We hypothesise that teleconsulting support will improve patient outcomes.

Heart Failure Evolution Model Based on Anomalous Diffusion Theory

The unexpectable variations of the diagnosed disease symptoms are quite often observed during medical diagnosis. In stochastics, such behavior is called "grey swan" or "black swan" as synonyms of sudden, unpredictable change. Evolution of the disease's symptoms is usually described by means of Markov processes, where dependency on process history is neglected. The common expectation is that such processes are Gaussian. It is demonstrated here that medical observation can be described as a Markov process and is non-Gaussian. Presented non-Gaussian processes have "fat tail" probability density distribution (pdf). "Fat tail" permits a slight change of probability density distribution and triggers an unexpectable big variation of the diagnosed parameter. Such "fat tail" solution is delivered by the anomalous diffusion model applied here to describe disease evolution and to explain the possible presence of "swans" mentioned above. The proposed model has been obtained as solution of the Fractal Fokker-Planck equation (FFPE). The paper shows a comparison of the results of the theoretical model of anomalous diffusion with experimental results of clinical studies using bioimpedance measurements in cardiology. This allows us to consider the practical usefulness of the proposed solutions.

Effects of an outpatient intervention comprising nurse-led non-invasive assessments, telemedicine support and remote cardiologists' decisions in patients with heart failure (AMULET study): a randomised controlled trial

Aim

Prevention of heart failure (HF) hospitalisations and deaths constitutes a major therapeutic aim in patients with HF. The role of telemedicine in this context remains equivocal. We investigated whether an outpatient telecare based on nurse‐led non‐invasive assessments supporting remote therapeutic decisions (AMULET telecare) could improve clinical outcomes in patients after an episode of acute HF during 12‐month follow‐up.

Methods and results

In this prospective randomised controlled trial, patients with HF and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤49%, after an episode of acute HF within the last 6 months, were randomly assigned to receive either an outpatient telecare based on nurse‐led non‐invasive assessments (n = 300) (AMULET model) or standard care (n = 305). The primary composite outcome of unplanned HF hospitalisation or cardiovascular death occurred in 51 (17.1%) patients in the telecare group and 73 (23.9%) patients in the standard care group up to 12 months after randomization [hazard ratio (HR) 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48–0.99; P = 0.044]. The implementation of AMULET telecare, as compared to standard care, reduced the risk of first unplanned HF hospitalisation (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42–0.91; P = 0.015) as well as the risk of total unplanned HF hospitalisations (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.41–0.99; P = 0.044).There was no difference in cardiovascular mortality between the study groups (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.54–1.67; P = 0.930).

Conclusions

AMULET telecare as compared to standard care significantly reduced the risk of HF hospitalisation or cardiovascular death during 12‐month follow‐up among patients with HF and LVEF ≤49% after an episode of acute HF.

Rationale and design of the AMULET study: A new Model of telemedical care in patients with heart failure

Aims

Heart failure (HF) is characterized by high mortality and hospital readmission rates. Limited access to cardiologists restricts the application of guideline‐directed, patient‐tailored medical therapy. Some telemedicine solutions and novel non‐invasive diagnostic tools may facilitate real‐time detection of early HF decompensation symptoms, prompt initiation of appropriate treatment, and optimal management of medical resources. We describe the rationale and design of the AMULET trial, which investigates the effect of comprehensive outpatient intervention, based on individualized haemodynamic assessment and teleconsultations, on cardiovascular mortality and unplanned hospitalizations in HF patients.

Methods and results

The AMULET trial is a multicentre, prospective, randomized, open‐label, and controlled parallel group trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03476590). Six hundred and five eligible patients with HF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤49%, at least one hospitalization due to acute HF decompensation within 6 months prior to enrolment) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either an intervention group or a standard care group. The planned follow‐up is 12 months. The AMULET interventions are performed in ambulatory care points operated by nurses, with the remote support of cardiologists. The comprehensive clinical evaluation comprises measurements of heart rate, blood pressure, body mass, thoracic fluid content, and total body water. A recommendation support module based on these objective parameters is implemented in remote therapeutic decision‐making. The primary complex endpoints are cardiovascular mortality and unplanned HF hospitalization.

Conclusions

The AMULET trial will provide a prospective assessment of the effect of comprehensive ambulatory intervention, based on telemedicine and haemodynamically guided therapy, on mortality and readmissions in HF patients.