A systematic review of rehabilitation in chronic heart failure: evaluating the reporting of exercise interventions

Cardiac Rehabilitation and Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Pathophysiology, Benefits, and Precautions

Heart failure (HF) is a highly comorbid condition associated with significant mortality, despite advances in current medical management. Patients who suffer from HF represent a high needs disease care population in whom structured, long-term chronic disease care delivery models, such as cardiac rehabilitation (CR), have been shown to be highly cost effective in reducing hospitalizations and improving quality of life. HF with reduced ejection fraction affects a growing number of Canadians and health care costs secondary to this condition are increasing, with further increases over the next decade to be expected. CR is a guideline-directed medical therapy for patients living with HF with reduced ejection fraction, and with increasing numbers of HF patients across the world, there is a prescient need to revisit the benefits, safety, and the prescription of this intervention for the health care professionals who treat this condition. Certainly, there is a clinical need for HF practitioners to better understand the pathophysiological benefits of CR with respect to exercise training, as well as the prudent precautions required to facilitate the safe delivery of this highly cost-effective patient intervention.

Impact of exercise training on clinical outcomes and quality of life in chronic congestive heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Exercise training is a well-established intervention for patients with heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction. Still, the evidence of its effects on mortality, hospitalization, and quality of life needs to be more conclusive. We aim to evaluate exercise training clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

METHODS

We searched five databases and three clinical trial registries for RCTs that compared exercise training plus usual care versus usual care alone in congestive heart failure (CHF) patients. We extracted data on all-cause mortality, hospital admission, heart failure hospitalization, and health-related quality of life measured by the Minnesota Living with HF questionnaire (MLHFW) and other scales. We pooled the data using random-effects or fixed-effects models, depending on the heterogeneity of the outcomes. We performed subgroup analyses for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

RESULTS

We included 61 RCTs with 9062 participants. There was no mortality benefit, but exercise training improved health-related quality of life, reduced hospital admission at 12 months and longer follow-up, and reduced heart failure hospitalization. We observed substantial enhancement in health-related quality of life and a greater decrease in hospital admissions in the HFpEF group compared to the HFrEF group.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the lack of mortality benefit, exercise training is a beneficial intervention for CHF patients, improving health-related quality of life and reducing hospitalization.

Non-Pharmacological Interventions in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of non-pharmacologic interventions and the additional benefits of their combination in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

DATA SOURCES

We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Clinical Trials Register from the date of database inception to April 22, 2023.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials involving non-pharmacologic interventions conducted in patients with HFrEF were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers based on a pre-tested data extraction form. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A total of 82 eligible studies (4574 participants) were included. We performed a random-effects model within a Bayesian framework to calculate weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% credibility intervals. High or moderate certainty evidence indicated that high-intensity aerobic interval training (HIAIT) was best on improving 6-minute walk distance (6MWD; 68.55 m [36.41, 100.47]) and left ventricular ejection fraction (6.28% [3.88, 8.77]), while high-intensity aerobic continuous training (HIACT) is best on improving peak oxygen consumption (Peak VO2; 3.48 mL/kg•min [2.84, 4.12]), quality of life (QOL; -17.26 [-29.99, -7.80]), resting heart rate (-8.20 bpm [-13.32, -3.05]), and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (-600.96 pg/mL [-902.93, -404.52]). Moderate certainty evidence supported the effectiveness of inspiratory muscle training to improve peak oxygen consumption and functional electrical stimulation to improve QOL. Moderate-intensity aerobic continuous training (MIACT) plus moderate-intensity resistance training (MIRT) had additional benefits in Peak VO2, 6MWD, and QOL. This review did not provide a comprehensive evaluation of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Both HIAIT and HIACT are the most effective single non-pharmacologic interventions for HFrEF. MIACT plus MIRT had additional benefits in improving peak oxygen consumption, 6MWD, and QOL.

The Clinical Effects of Pharmacotherapy Combined with Blood Flow Restriction and Isometric Exercise Training in Rehabilitating Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is associated with reduced cardiac function and impaired quality of life. Blood flow restriction (BFR) training is emerging as a potential adjunctive therapy. This study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of combination of BFR and isometric exercises on cardiac function, functional status, and quality of life in HFrEF patients. Totally 44 patients with HFrEF were equally divided into a control group and a combined treatment group. Both groups received standard pharmacotherapy and upper limb exercise, with the combined group also undergoing BFR and isometric exercise training. We assessed demographic and clinical characteristics, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification, cardiac function parameters, serum Brain Natriuretic Peptide levels, physical capacity via the 6-minute walking test, and quality of life using the Heart Failure Questionnaire (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire). Post-treatment, the combined group significantly improved in NYHA classification (p = 0.012), with more patients shifting to a better class. Cardiac function improved in both groups, with the combined group showing a greater increase in mean left ventricular ejection fractions (p < 0.001), and reductions in left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic diameters (p < 0.05). The addition of BFR training to standard pharmacotherapy with upper limb exercise in HFrEF patients led to significant enhancements in cardiac function, functional status, and quality of life. These findings support the integration of BFR training into conventional HFrEF treatment regimens to maximize patient recovery outcomes.

Factors related to non-adherence to cardiac rehabilitation in patients with heart failure

INTRODUCTION

In heart failure, cardiac rehabilitation has been recommended as an intervention strategy that improves functional capacity, health-related quality of life and survival. However, adherence to these programs is low. The objective was to determine the factors related to non-adherence to cardiac rehabilitation in patients with heart failure in Colombia.

METHOD

Observational and retrospective study. Patients with heart failure were linked in a clinic in Colombia, adherence to cardiac rehabilitation was measured with ≥80% of scheduled sessions. Sociodemographic and clinical variables, functional aerobic capacity (Sit to Stand and 6-minute walk test), Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), quality of life Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLFHQ) and depression Patient health questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) were taken into account.

RESULTS

300 patients were linked with heart failure with age 63.16 ± 12.87 men 194 (64.7%). adherence to cardiac rehabilitation was 66.67%, there were statistically significant differences between the groups in arterial hypertension, LVEF, cholesterol, LDL, Triglycerides, SBP, DBP, distance traveled, VO2e, METs, DASI and PHQ-9 p-value =<0.05. The logistic regression model adjusted for sex and age showed OR for non-adherence to CR arterial hypertension 2.23[1.22-4.07], LDL outside of goals 2.15[1.20-3.88], triglycerides outside goals 2.34[1.35-4.07], DASI<4METs 2.38 [1.04-5.45] and PHQ-9 1.06[1.00-1.12].

CONCLUSION

High blood pressure, LDL, triglycerides, DASI and depression with the PHQ-9 questionnaire are related factors for not having adherence to cardiac rehabilitation in patients with heart failure.

Effect of different types of aerobic training on peak VO2 and ejection fraction for diastolic heart failure patients; a comparative randomized control trial

BACKGROUND

Heart failure is described by a lack of confirmed efficient therapies and exercise intolerance. Engagement in physical activity decreases the possibility of adverse cardiovascular consequences involving heart failure.

THE PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

Determine the effect of different types of aerobic training on peak VO2 and ejection fraction in diastolic heart failure patients.

SUBJECT AND METHODS

The study was designed as a randomized control trail. Forty-eight eligible male patients with diastolic heart failure, aged between 50 and 65 years old, enrolled in this study. They were picked up from Police hospital outpatient clinic and were assigned to 2 equal groups in numbers. The first group (A) received aerobic exercise for the upper limb in the form of arm ergometer exercises, while the second group (B) received aerobic exercise for the lower limb in the form of cycling. Training duration for both groups was 3 sessions/week for 12 weeks. Peak VO2, and ejection fraction of both groups were measured and compared pre- and post-treatment.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in the ejection fraction between groups post-treatment. However, a significant increase (p < 0.001) was observed in the peak VO2 of group B when compared to group A post-treatment.

CONCLUSION

There is no effect of different types of aerobic training on ejection fraction in diastolic heart failure patients, but lower limb exercise is more effective than upper limb exercise in improving peak VO2 in diastolic heart failure patients. Therefore, the current study recommended the use of lower limb exercise over upper limb exercise in training diastolic heart failure patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered in ClinicalTrial.gov as a clinical trial ID (NCT05637125).

Clinical practice guidelines for diagnostic and treatment of the chronic heart failure

Chronic heart failure continues to be one of the main causes of impairment in the functioning and quality of life of people who suffer from it, as well as one of the main causes of mortality in our country and around the world. Mexico has a high prevalence of risk factors for developing heart failure, such as high blood pressure, diabetes, and obesity, which makes it essential to have an evidence-based document that provides recommendations to health professionals involved in the diagnosis and treatment of these patients. This document establishes the clinical practice guide (CPG) prepared at the initiative of the Mexican Society of Cardiology (SMC) in collaboration with the Iberic American Agency for the Development and Evaluation of Health Technologies, with the purpose of establishing recommendations based on the best available evidence and agreed upon by an interdisciplinary group of experts. This document complies with international quality standards, such as those described by the US Institute of Medicine (IOM), the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE), the Intercollegiate Network for Scottish Guideline Development (SIGN) and the Guidelines International Network (G-I-N). The Guideline Development Group was integrated in a multi-collaborative and interdisciplinary manner with the support of methodologists with experience in systematic literature reviews and the development of CPG. A modified Delphi panel methodology was developed and conducted to achieve an adequate level of consensus in each of the recommendations contained in this CPG. We hope that this document contributes to better clinical decision making and becomes a reference point for clinicians who manage patients with chronic heart failure in all their clinical stages and in this way, we improve the quality of clinical care, improve their quality of life and reducing its complications.

Experiences of what influences physical activity adherence in Iranian patients with heart failure: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) is becoming one of the important health care problems around the world. Physical activity as the foundation of the cardiac rehabilitation program is poorly adhered by patients with HF. This study aimed to understand the experiences of patients with HF in terms of adherence to physical activity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted using conventional qualitative content analysis. Data were collected by semistructured telephone interviews with 25 patients with HF through open-ended questions. Data were collected from patients with HF in Birjand and Mashhad hospitals and heart departments from December 2021 to March 2022. Data were analyzed using Max-QDA10 and data analysis was continuous, comparative, and simultaneous with data collection.

RESULTS

After data analysis, three main categories were identified: (1) patient-related barriers and facilitators, (2) support system-related barriers and facilitators, and (3) environmental barriers and facilitators. These categories were subdivided into two main themes: (1) threatening disease and (2) challenging disease.

CONCLUSION

The results showed that beyond patient-related, support system-related, and environmental categories, perceiving the disease as a challenge or a threat is crucial in the activity of patients with HF. Nurses and other health care providers can train problem-solving behaviors to patients with HF to improve their physical and mental well-being. It is suggested that theoretical-behavioral approaches can be used in future clinical trials to improve adherence to physical activity.

Cardiovascular Disease and Exercise: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Applications

Inactivity is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Exercise may greatly enhance the metabolism and function of the cardiovascular system, lower several risk factors, and prevent the development and treatment of cardiovascular disease while delivering easy, physical, and emotional enjoyment. Exercise regulates the cardiovascular system by reducing oxidative stress and chronic inflammation, regulating cardiovascular insulin sensitivity and the body's metabolism, promoting stem cell mobilization, strengthening autophagy and myocardial mitochondrial function, and enhancing cardiovascular damage resistance, among other effects. Appropriate exercise intervention has become an essential adjuvant therapy in clinical practice for treating and rehabilitating various cardiovascular diseases. However, the prescription of exercise for preventing and treating cardiovascular diseases, particularly the precise selection of individual exercise techniques and their volume, remains controversial. Using multiomics to explain further the molecular process underlying the positive effects of exercise on cardiovascular health will not only improve our understanding of the effects of exercise on health but also establish a scientific basis and supply new ideas for preventing and treating cardiovascular diseases by activating the endogenous protective mechanisms of the body and suggesting more specific exercise prescriptions for cardiovascular rehabilitation.

Old and new equations for maximal heart rate prediction in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction on beta-blockers treatment: results from the MECKI score data set

AIMS

Predicting maximal heart rate (MHR) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) still remains a major concern. In such a context, the Keteyian equation is the only one derived in a HFrEF cohort on optimized β-blockers treatment. Therefore, using the Metabolic Exercise combined with Cardiac and Kidney Indexes (MECKI) data set, we looked for a possible MHR equation, for an external validation of Keteyien formula and, contextually, for accuracy of the historical MHR formulas and their relationship with the HR measured at the anaerobic threshold (AT).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data from 3487 HFrEF outpatients on optimized β-blockers treatment from the MECKI data set were analyzed. Besides excluding all possible confounders, the new equation was derived by using HR data coming from maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test. The simplified derived equation was [109-(0.5*age) + (0.5*HR rest) + (0.2*LVEF)-(5 if haemoglobin <11 g/dL)]. The R2 and the standard error of the estimate were 0.24 and 17.5 beats min-1 with a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) = 11.9%. The Keteyian equation had a slightly higher MAPE = 12.3%. Conversely, the Fox and Tanaka equations showed extremely higher MAPE values. The range 75-80% of MHR according to the new and the Keteyian equations was the most accurate in identifying the HR at the AT (MAPEs = 11.3-11.6%).

CONCLUSION

The derived equation to estimate the MHR in HFrEF patients, by accounting also for the systolic dysfunction degree and anaemia, improved slightly the Keteyian formula. Both formulas might be helpful in identifying the true maximal effort during an exercise test and the intensity domain during a rehabilitation programme.

Point-of-care heart failure platform: where are we now and where are we going to?

INTRODUCTION

Heart failure (HF) remains a leading cause of cardiovascular (CV) mortality in patients with CV disease. The point-of-care (POC) HF platform seems to be an ideal non-invasive workflow-adapted system for personally adjusted management of patients with HF.

AREAS COVERED

In the present manuscript, we reviewed the literature covering some relevant studies regarding the role of point-of care heart failure platform in the risk stratification, earlier diagnosis and prognostically beneficial treatment of patients with different phenotypes of HF.

EXPERT OPINION

POC HF platform including personal consultation, optimization of the comorbidity treatment, step-by-step HF diagnostic algorithm, single biomarker measurements, has also partially been provided in the current guidelines. Although there are several obstacles to implement POC in routine practice, such as education level, aging, affordability of health care, even partial implementation of POC can also improve clinical outcomes. POC seems to be an evolving model, more research studies are required to clearly see whether it helps to make better decisions with diagnosis and care of HF, as well helps to achieve better clinical outcomes.In summary, the POC HF platform is considered to be a more effective tool than conventional algorithm of HF management.

Effect of ICD/CRT-D Implantation on Adverse Events and Readmission Rate in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure (CHF)

Objective

To explore the effect of implantable cardioverter defibrillator/cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (ICD/CRT-D) implantation on adverse events and the readmission rate in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF).

Methods

Sixty patients with CHF treated in our hospital from April 2019 to July 2021 were enrolled. The patients were randomly assigned into the control group and study group. The control group received routine intervention, and the study group received remote management with ICD/CRT-D implantation.

Results

First of all, we compared the general data of the two groups. There was no significant difference in LVEF, NYHA grade, concomitant disease, and history of arrhythmia (P > 0.05). Secondly, we compared the end-point events. In the study group, 5 cases of heart failure were readmitted, 0 cases died, and 4 cases were admitted to hospital with arrhythmia and ICD events, with a total incidence of 30.0%, while in the control group, 12 cases were rehospitalized with heart failure, 3 cases died, 25 cases were admitted with arrhythmia and ICD events, and the total incidence rate was 56.67% (P < 0.05). In terms of the readmission rate of patients with heart failure in grade NYHAII and grade III, among the patients with grade NYHAII, the number of patients with heart failure less than once in the study group was higher compared to that in the control group and the number of patients with heart failure ≥ once in the study group was lower compared to that in the control group (P < 0.05). Among the patients with grade NYHAIII, the number of patients with heart failure less than once in the study group was higher compared to that in the control group and the number of patients with heart failure ≥ once in the study group was lower compared to that in the control group. There exhibited no significant difference in the data (P > 0.05). Considering the occurrence of VT and VF events, the study team reported that 14 patients recorded a total of 276 ventricular arrhythmias: 261 ventricular tachycardia and 15 ventricular fibrillations. Among them, 24 VT (9.2%) and 4 VF (26.7%) were determined to be misrecognition of the equipment. A total of 178 ventricular arrhythmias were recorded in 13 patients in the control group, including 152 ventricular tachycardia and 26 ventricular fibrillations. Among them, 10 VT (6.6%) and 8 VF (30.8%) were determined as misrecognition of the device. In regard to the treatment results of the two groups, after admission to the hospital for radio frequency, ablation, and adjustment of drug treatment to reprogram control, the patients did not reappear to have CRT-D misidentification and misdischarged. Finally, we compared the diagnosis time of VT/VE events. The time from VT/VE events to diagnosis in 14 patients in the study group was 2.55 ± 1.41 days, and that in 13 patients in the control group was 37.32 ± 15.31 days. The discovery of ICD events in the study group was significantly earlier compared to that in the routine follow-up group (P < 0.05). This gives doctors enough time to assess the patient's condition and determine a further diagnosis and treatment plan.

Conclusion

Using ICD/CRT-D implantation to remotely monitor patients with CHF, through remote monitoring of the 24-hour average heart rate and the heart rate at rest and patient activity and other parameters and early intervention, the readmission rate caused by the deterioration of heart failure can be reduced. Compared with routine follow-up, remote monitoring significantly reduced the diagnosis time of VT/VE events.

Molecular Mechanisms of Exercise and Healthspan

Healthspan is the period of our life without major debilitating diseases. In the modern world where unhealthy lifestyle choices and chronic diseases taper the healthspan, which lead to an enormous economic burden, finding ways to promote healthspan becomes a pressing goal of the scientific community. Exercise, one of humanity's most ancient and effective lifestyle interventions, appears to be at the center of the solution since it can both treat and prevent the occurrence of many chronic diseases. Here, we will review the current evidence and opinions about regular exercise promoting healthspan through enhancing the functionality of our organ systems and preventing diseases.

Effect of different intensity exercises intervention on cardiovascular functions and quality of life on patients with chronic heart failure: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Exercise training can improve exercise capacity, quality of life, and reduce hospitalization time in chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. Various training protocols have been studied in CHF, but there is no consensus on the optimal exercise intensity for the rehabilitation of cardiac patients. Therefore, systematic evaluation of the effects of different exercise intensities on the efficacy of cardiac function and quality of life in patients with CHF was done.

METHODS

Computer searches of PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, Embase, SinoMed, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and VIP databases were conducted to collect randomized controlled trials of different exercise intensities applied to patients with CHF. Study selection and data extraction will be performed simultaneously by two independent reviewers, using the PEDro scale for quality assessment of the included literature. Publication bias will be assessed by funnel plot, and Begg and Egger tests. The I2 statistic and the chi-square (χ2) test will be used to assess heterogeneity. In addition, subgroup analyses will be performed for different left ventricular ejection fraction populations and different intervention cycles. All meta-analyses will be performed using Revman5.3 software.

RESULTS

The present study is a systematic review and meta-analysis program with no results. Data analysis will be completed after the program has been completed.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis may provide more reliable, evidence-based evidence for the choice of exercise intensity in patients with CHF.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021276529.