Assessing frailty in heart failure

The association between frailty and the risk of mortality in critically ill congestive heart failure patients: findings from the MIMIC-IV database

Background

Frailty is a severe, common co-morbidity associated with congestive heart failure (CHF). This retrospective cohort study assesses the association between frailty and the risk of mortality in critically ill CHF patients.

Methods

Eligible patients with CHF from the Medical Information Base for Intensive Care IV database were retrospectively analyzed. The frailty index based on laboratory tests (FI_Lab) index was calculated using 33 variables to assess frailty status. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and one-year mortality. The secondary outcomes were the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and the administration of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in patients with concurrent AKI. Survival disparities among the FI_Lab subgroups were estimated with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The association between the FI_Lab index and mortality was examined with Cox proportional risk modeling.

Results

A total of 3273 adult patients aged 18 years and older were enrolled in the study, with 1820 men and 1453 women included. The incidence rates of in-hospital mortality and one-year mortality rate were 0.96 per 1,000 person-days and 263.8 per 1,000 person-years, respectively. Multivariable regression analysis identified baseline FI_Lab > 0.45 as an independent risk factor predicting in-hospital mortality (odds ratio = 3.221, 95% CI 2.341-4.432, p < 0.001) and one-year mortality (hazard ratio=2.152, 95% CI: 1.730-2.678, p < 0.001). In terms of predicting mortality, adding FI_Lab to the six disease severity scores significantly improved the overall performance of the model (all p < 0.001).

Conclusions

We established a positive correlation between the baseline FI_Lab and the likelihood of adverse outcomes in critical CHF patients. Given its potential as a reliable prognostic tool for such patients, further validation of FI_Lab across multiple centers is recommended for future research.

Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Frailty: From Young to Superaged Coexisting HFpEF and Frailty

Being commonly diagnosed in elderly women and associated with comorbidities as well as ageing-related cardio-vascular changes, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has been recently considered as a distinct cardiogeriatric syndrome. Frailty is another frequent geriatric syndrome. HFpEF and frailty share common underlying mechanisms, often co-exist, and represent each other's risk factors. A threshold of 65 years old is usually used to screen patients for both frailty and HFpEF in research and clinical settings. However, both HFpEF and frailty are very heterogenous conditions that may develop at younger ages. In this review we aim to provide a broader overview on the coexistence of HFpEF and frailty throughout the lifetime. We hypothesize that HFpEF and frailty patients' profiles (young, elderly, superaged) represent a continuum of the common ageing process modified by cumulative exposure to risk factors resulting to a presentation of HFpEF and frailty at different ages. We believe, that suggested approach might stimulate assessment of frailty in HFpEF assessment and vice versa regardless of age and early implementation of targeted interventions. Future studies of pathophysiology, clinical features, and outcomes of frailty in HFpEF by age are needed.

Disentangling Heart Failure and Physical Frailty: Prospective Study of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair

BACKGROUND

Frailty and heart failure share pathophysiology and clinical characteristics.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to analyze the contribution of heart failure to the physical frailty phenotype by examining patients with heart failure before and after percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR).

METHODS

Frailty according to the Fried criteria (weight loss, weakness, exhaustion, slowness, and low activity) was assessed in consecutive patients before and 6 weeks after PMVR.

RESULTS

A total of 118 of 258 patients (45.7%) (mean age: 78 ± 9 years, 42% female, 55% with secondary mitral regurgitation) were frail at baseline, which significantly decreased to 74 patients (28.7 %) at follow-up (P < 0.001). The frequency of frailty domains slowness, exhaustion, and inactivity significantly decreased, whereas weakness remained unchanged. Baseline frailty was significantly associated with comorbidities, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, and functional capacity, whereas frailty after PMVR was not associated with NT-proBNP levels. Predictors of postprocedural reversibility of frailty were NYHA functional class 

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of mitral regurgitation in patients with heart failure is associated with almost a halved burden of physical frailty, particularly in patients with a less advanced phenotype. Considering the prognostic relevance of frailty dynamics, this data warrants further evaluation of the concept of frailty as a primary treatment target.

Collapse

Key Words

• frailty
• heart failure
• percutaneous mitral valve repair

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Female
• Male
• Mitral Valve Insufficiency/complications
• Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery
• Mitral Valve/surgery
• Prospective Studies
• Frailty/complications
• Heart Failure/complications
• Heart Failure/surgery
• Treatment Outcome

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Clemens Metze Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, and Department III of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Christos Iliadis Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, and Department III of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Maria I Körber Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, and Department III of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Jennifer von Stein Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, and Department III of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Marcel Halbach Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, and Department III of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Stephan Baldus Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, and Department III of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Roman Pfister Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, and Department III of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Collapse

Frailty phenotype in heart failure: A condition that transcends age

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Studies on younger frail and pre-frail subjects suffering from heart failure (HF) are scarce, except for those focusing on the critically ill. This work aims to describe differences between younger (<65 years) and older (≥65 years) pre-frail and frail HF outpatients regarding their nutritional, functional and clinical statuses.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, a sample of 99 HF frail and pre-frail patients (aged 24-81 years, 38.4% women, 21.2% frail, 59.6% <65 years) was recruited from an HF outpatients' clinic in northern Portugal. Muscle mass was estimated from mid-upper arm muscle circumference. Weight status was assessed using body mass index. Hand grip strength and gait speed were measured. Medical records were reviewed. Associations between participants' characteristics and age were calculated using binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

Age was associated with hand grip strength (OR=0.90), gait speed (OR=0.01) and diabetes (OR=4.95). Obesity, muscle mass or heart failure functional classes were not associated with age categories.

CONCLUSION

There is an overall lack of differentiation between younger and older HF patients with the frailty phenotype. Therefore, frailty phenotype should be assessed in all patients, regardless of age. Hand grip strength seems to be a good predictor for older age and more studies are needed to define age-specific hand grip strength cut-offs for HF populations.

Sarcopenia and Frailty in Heart Failure: Is There a Biomarker Signature?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Sarcopenia and frailty are common in patients with heart failure (HF) and are strongly associated with prognosis. This review aims to examine promising biomarkers that can guide physicians in identifying sarcopenia and frailty in HF.

RECENT FINDINGS

Traditional biomarkers including C-reactive protein, aminotransaminase, myostatin, and urinary creatinine as well as novel biomarkers including microRNAs, suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2), galectin-3, and procollagen type III N-terminal peptide may help in predicting the development of sarcopenia and frailty in HF patients. Among those biomarkers, aminotransferase, urinary creatinine, and ST2 predicted the prognosis in HF patients with sarcopenia and frailty. This review outlines the current knowledge of biomarkers that are considered promising for diagnosing sarcopenia and frailty in HF. The listed biomarkers might support the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic decisions for sarcopenia and frailty in HF patients.

Frailty in older adults with heart disease

BACKGROUND

Heart failure prevalence will double in the next 40 years and affects more than 10% of persons over the age of 70 years in an age-dependent manner. Frailty is an age-associated clinical syndrome defined as a decrease in physiological reserve in situations of stress, such as operations, infections and acute illness based on a state of higher vulnerability. The prevalence is up to 74% in older individuals over the age of 80 years or those over 70 years old with a high burden of comorbidities and chronic diseases. This geriatric syndrome is associated with a worse clinical outcome and higher morbidity and mortality in acute and chronic disease than in age-matched cohorts without this syndrome.

METHODS

In this brief review, the scientific evidence of appropriate tools for diagnosis of frailty in heart failure patients is addressed. Heart failure management in this special group of patients requires a holistic care planning presented here in accordance with pathophysiologic particularities. A literature search in PubMed using the terms "heart failure" and "frailty" was carried out and a further search in the references based on the findings.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of frailty should influence the intensity of further diagnostic investigations and medical treatment based on the personal wishes of the patient, reduced organ reserves and general prognosis. The prognosis of heart failure patients remains poor, partially due to the intertwining with frailty. A clear statement for the use of an appropriate diagnostic tool for frailty and heart failure and specific therapeutic recommendations are presented based on clinical evidence.

Roadmap for the management of heart failure patients during the vulnerable phase after heart failure hospitalizations: how to implement excellence in clinical practice

Patients discharged after an episode of acute heart failure have an increased risk of hospitalizations and deaths within the subsequent 3 months. This phase is commonly called the 'vulnerable period' and it represents a window of opportunity of intervention in order to improve longer term outcomes. Prompt identification of signs of residual haemodynamic congestion is a priority in planning for the out-of-hospital management strategies. Patients will also need to be screened for frailty and have a prioritization of the management of their comorbidities. Life-saving medications should be started together or in a short time and up-titrated (when needed) according to blood pressure, heart rate and concomitant comorbidities. Ideally, patients should be assessed by their general practitioner within 1 week of discharge and have a hospital/clinic follow-up within 4 weeks of discharge. Patients should progressively resume physical activities and adhere to an educational programme with appropriate lifestyle adjustments best implemented during a cardiac rehabilitation programme.