1
|
Fisher T, Hill N, Kalakoutas A, Lahlou A, Rathod K, Proudfoot A, Warren A. Sex differences in treatments and outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and epidemiological meta-analysis. Crit Care 2024; 28:192. [PMID: 38845019 PMCID: PMC11157877 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-04973-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women are at higher risk of mortality from many acute cardiovascular conditions, but studies have demonstrated differing findings regarding the mortality of cardiogenic shock in women and men. To examine differences in 30-day mortality and mechanical circulatory support use by sex in patients with cardiogenic shock. MAIN BODY Cochrane Central, PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched in April 2024. Studies were included if they were randomised controlled trials or observational studies, included adult patients with cardiogenic shock, and reported at least one of the following outcomes by sex: raw mortality, adjusted mortality (odds ratio) or use of mechanical circulatory support. Out of 4448 studies identified, 81 met inclusion criteria, pooling a total of 656,754 women and 1,018,036 men. In the unadjusted analysis for female sex and combined in-hospital and 30-day mortality, women had higher odds of mortality (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-1.44, p < 0.001). Pooled unadjusted mortality was 35.9% in men and 40.8% in women (p < 0.001). When only studies reporting adjusted ORs were included, combined in-hospital/30-day mortality remained higher in women (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.06-1.15, p < 0.001). These effects remained consistent across subgroups of acute myocardial infarction- and heart failure- related cardiogenic shock. Overall, women were less likely to receive mechanical support than men (OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.57-0.79, p < 0.001); specifically, they were less likely to be treated with intra-aortic balloon pump (OR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.71-0.89, p < 0.001) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (OR = 0.84, 95% 0.71-0.99, p = 0.045). No significant difference was seen with use of percutaneous ventricular assist devices (OR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.51-1.33, p = 0.42). CONCLUSION Even when adjusted for confounders, mortality for cardiogenic shock in women is approximately 10% higher than men. This effect is seen in both acute myocardial infarction and heart failure cardiogenic shock. Women with cardiogenic shock are less likely to be treated with mechanical circulatory support than men. Clinicians should make immediate efforts to ensure the prompt diagnosis and aggressive treatment of cardiogenic shock in women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Fisher
- North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Rd, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK
| | - Nicole Hill
- Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Combe Park, Bath, Avon, BA1 3NG, UK
| | | | - Assad Lahlou
- Barts Health Library Services, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK
| | - Krishnaraj Rathod
- Barts Health NHS Trust, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK
- William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK
| | - Alastair Proudfoot
- Barts Health NHS Trust, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK
- Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Group, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University London, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK
| | - Alex Warren
- Barts Health NHS Trust, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK.
- Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Group, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University London, W Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK.
- Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, University of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ughetto A, Schrage B, Delmas C. Cardiogenic shock in 2024: insight the complex reality of ECLS and left ventricular unloading strategies. Intensive Care Med 2024; 50:971-973. [PMID: 38695923 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07400-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Aurore Ughetto
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital, CHU Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
| | - Benedikt Schrage
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Clément Delmas
- Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Cardiology Department, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France
- Recherche Et Enseignement en Insuffisance Cardiaque Avancée, Assistance Et Transplantation (REICATRA), Institut Saint Jacques, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Besch L, Schrage B. Unloading in cardiogenic shock: the rationale and current evidence. Curr Opin Crit Care 2024:00075198-990000000-00174. [PMID: 38841993 DOI: 10.1097/mcc.0000000000001167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Discussing the rationale and current evidence for left ventricular unloading in cardiogenic shock. RECENT FINDINGS Microaxial flow pumps (MFP) and intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP) augment cardiac output while simultaneously unloading the left ventricle (LV, e.g. reducing left ventricular pressure), thereby targeting a key mechanism of cardiogenic shock. A recent randomized trial has shown a mortality reduction with MFP in selected patients with cardiogenic shock, strengthening the rationale for this strategy, although the evidence for the IABP is so far neutral. MFP/IABP can also be used concomitantly with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (va-ECMO) to alleviate the va-ECMO-related increase in left ventricular afterload, to facilitate weaning and ultimately to improve myocardial recovery and prognosis of affected patients. However, the use of MFP/IABP in this indication solely relies on retrospective data, which need to be interpreted with caution, especially as these strategies are associated with more complications. Currently ongoing randomized trials will help to further clarify the role of left ventricular unloading in patients on va-ECMO. SUMMARY Left ventricular unloading addresses a key mechanism of cardiogenic shock, with strong evidence to support MFP use in selected patients, but further randomized controlled trials are required to clarify the role of different devices/strategies for the overall shock population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Besch
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Schrage
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Beghini A, Sammartino AM, Papp Z, von Haehling S, Biegus J, Ponikowski P, Adamo M, Falco L, Lombardi CM, Pagnesi M, Savarese G, Metra M, Tomasoni D. 2024 update in heart failure. ESC Heart Fail 2024. [PMID: 38806171 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.14857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Revised: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024] Open
Abstract
In the last years, major progress has occurred in heart failure (HF) management. The 2023 ESC focused update of the 2021 HF guidelines introduced new key recommendations based on the results of the last years of science. First, two drugs, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and finerenone, a novel nonsteroidal, selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), are recommended for the prevention of HF in patients with diabetic chronic kidney disease (CKD). Second, SGLT2 inhibitors are now recommended for the treatment of HF across the entire left ventricular ejection fraction spectrum. The benefits of quadruple therapy in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are well established. Its rapid and early up-titration along with a close follow-up with frequent clinical and laboratory re-assessment after an episode of acute HF (the so-called 'high-intensity care' strategy) was associated with better outcomes in the STRONG-HF trial. Patients experiencing an episode of worsening HF might require a fifth drug, vericiguat. In the STEP-HFpEF-DM and STEP-HFpEF trials, semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly administered for 1 year decreased body weight and significantly improved quality of life and the 6 min walk distance in obese patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with or without a history of diabetes. Further data on safety and efficacy, including also hard endpoints, are needed to support the addition of acetazolamide or hydrochlorothiazide to a standard diuretic regimen in patients hospitalized due to acute HF. In the meantime, PUSH-AHF supported the use of natriuresis-guided diuretic therapy. Further options and most recent evidence for the treatment of HF, including specific drugs for cardiomyopathies (i.e., mavacamten in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and tafamidis in transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis), device therapies, cardiac contractility modulation and percutaneous treatment of valvulopathies, with the recent finding from the TRILUMINATE Pivotal trial, are also reviewed in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Beghini
- Institute of Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Antonio Maria Sammartino
- Institute of Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Zoltán Papp
- Division of Clinical Physiology, Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Stephan von Haehling
- Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Jan Biegus
- Institute of Heart Diseases, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Piotr Ponikowski
- Institute of Heart Diseases, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Marianna Adamo
- Institute of Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luigi Falco
- Heart Failure Unit, Department of Cardiology, AORN dei Colli-Monaldi Hospital Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Carlo Mario Lombardi
- Institute of Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Matteo Pagnesi
- Institute of Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Savarese
- Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Heart and Vascular and Neuro Theme, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marco Metra
- Institute of Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Daniela Tomasoni
- Institute of Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
- Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Protti I, van Steenwijk MPJ, Meani P, Fresiello L, Meuwese CL, Donker DW. Left Ventricular Unloading in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Clinical Perspective Derived from Basic Cardiovascular Physiology. Curr Cardiol Rep 2024:10.1007/s11886-024-02067-w. [PMID: 38713362 DOI: 10.1007/s11886-024-02067-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To present an abridged overview of the literature and pathophysiological background of adjunct interventional left ventricular unloading strategies during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO). From a clinical perspective, the mechanistic complexity of such combined mechanical circulatory support often requires in-depth physiological reasoning at the bedside, which remains a cornerstone of daily practice for optimal patient-specific V-A ECMO care. RECENT FINDINGS Recent conventional clinical trials have not convincingly shown the superiority of V-A ECMO in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock as compared with medical therapy alone. Though, it has repeatedly been reported that the addition of interventional left ventricular unloading to V-A ECMO may improve clinical outcome. Novel approaches such as registry-based adaptive platform trials and computational physiological modeling are now introduced to inform clinicians by aiming to better account for patient-specific variation and complexity inherent to V-A ECMO and have raised a widespread interest. To provide modern high-quality V-A ECMO care, it remains essential to understand the patient's pathophysiology and the intricate interaction of an individual patient with extracorporeal circulatory support devices. Innovative clinical trial design and computational modeling approaches carry great potential towards advanced clinical decision support in ECMO and related critical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Protti
- Departments of Cardiology and Intensive Care, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - M P J van Steenwijk
- Departments of Cardiology and Intensive Care, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P Meani
- Maastricht University Medical Center+, Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart and Vascular Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - L Fresiello
- Cardiovascular and Respiratory Physiology, TechMed Center, University of Twente, Hallenweg 5, 7522, NH, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - C L Meuwese
- Departments of Cardiology and Intensive Care, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D W Donker
- Cardiovascular and Respiratory Physiology, TechMed Center, University of Twente, Hallenweg 5, 7522, NH, Enschede, The Netherlands.
- Intensive Care Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ezad SM, Ryan M, Barrett N, Camporota L, Swol J, Antonini MV, Donker DW, Pappalardo F, Kapur NK, Rose L, Perera D. Left ventricular unloading in patients supported with veno-arterial extra corporeal membrane oxygenation; an international EuroELSO survey. Perfusion 2024; 39:13S-22S. [PMID: 38651575 DOI: 10.1177/02676591241229647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) improves end-organ perfusion in cardiogenic shock but may increase afterload, which can limit cardiac recovery. Left ventricular (LV) unloading strategies may aid cardiac recovery and prevent complications of increased afterload. However, there is no consensus on when and which unloading strategy should be used. METHODS An online survey was distributed worldwide via the EuroELSO newsletter mailing list to describe contemporary international practice and evaluate heterogeneity in strategies for LV unloading. RESULTS Of 192 respondents from 43 countries, 53% routinely use mechanical LV unloading, to promote ventricular recovery and/or to prevent complications. Of those that do not routinely unload, 65% cited risk of complications as the reason. The most common indications for unplanned unloading were reduced arterial line pulsatility (68%), pulmonary edema (64%) and LV dilatation (50%). An intra-aortic balloon pump was the most frequently used device for unloading followed by percutaneous left ventricular assist devices. Echocardiography was the most frequently used method to monitor the response to unloading. CONCLUSIONS Significant variation exists with respect to international practice of ventricular unloading. Further research is required that compares the efficacy of different unloading strategies and a randomized comparison of routine mechanical unloading versus unplanned unloading.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saad M Ezad
- British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence at the School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Matthew Ryan
- British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence at the School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Nicholas Barrett
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Luigi Camporota
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Justyna Swol
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Marta V Antonini
- Intensive Care Unit, Bufalini Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Cesena, Italy
- Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Dirk W Donker
- Intensive Care Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Cardiovascular and Respiratory Physiology, TechMed Center, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Federico Pappalardo
- Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, AO SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Navin K Kapur
- The Cardiovascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Louise Rose
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, Division of Applied Technologies for Clinical Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Divaka Perera
- British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence at the School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Caruso V, Berthoud V, Bouchot O, Nguyen M, Bouhemad B, Guinot PG. Should the Vasoactive Inotropic Score be a Determinant for Early Initiation of VA ECMO in Postcardiotomy Cardiogenic Shock? J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2024; 38:724-730. [PMID: 38182434 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.11.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The authors investigated the role of early venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) implantation in patients with postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCS) on mortality and morbidity when integrating vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS) and type of catecholamine support. DESIGN A retrospective, multicenter, observational study with propensity-weight matching. SETTING Four university-affiliated intensive care units. PARTICIPANTS Patients with PCS in the operating room. INTERVENTIONS Early VA ECMO support. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Of 2,742 patients screened during the study period, 424 (16%) patients were treated with inotropic drugs, and 75 (3%) patients were supported by VA ECMO in the operating room. Patients supported by VA ECMO had a higher use of vasopressor and inotropic drugs, with a higher VIS score. After propensity matching (integrating VIS and catecholamines type), mortality (56% v 20%, p < 0.001) and morbidity (cardiac, renal, transfusion) were higher in patients supported by VA ECMO than in a matched control group. CONCLUSIONS When matching integrated the pre-ECMO VIS and the type of catecholamines, VA ECMO remained associated with high mortality and morbidity, suggesting that VIS alone should not be used as a main determinant of VA ECMO implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenza Caruso
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Dijon University Medical Centre, Dijon, France
| | - Vivien Berthoud
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Dijon University Medical Centre, Dijon, France; University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Olivier Bouchot
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Dijon University Medical Centre, Dijon, France
| | - Maxime Nguyen
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Dijon University Medical Centre, Dijon, France; University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Belaid Bouhemad
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Dijon University Medical Centre, Dijon, France; University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Pierre-Grégoire Guinot
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Dijon University Medical Centre, Dijon, France; University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ughetto A, Aouinti S, Molinari N, Roubille F, Delmas C. Early left ventricular unloading via active transseptal left atrial venting in case of cardiogenic shock under veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A meta-analysis. Eur J Heart Fail 2024; 26:701-703. [PMID: 38374544 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.3178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Revised: 01/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Aurore Ughetto
- Anesthesia and Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Safa Aouinti
- Clinical Research and Epidemiology Unit, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Nicolas Molinari
- Clinical Research and Epidemiology Unit, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - François Roubille
- Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Cardiology Department, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Clément Delmas
- Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Cardiology Department, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France
- Recherche et Enseignement en Insuffisance Cardiaque Avancée, Assistance et Transplantation (REICATRA), Institut Saint Jacques, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vishram-Nielsen JKK, Gustafsson F. Watchful waiting for venting in venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Eur J Heart Fail 2023; 25:2047-2049. [PMID: 37771278 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.3045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Finn Gustafsson
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tomasoni D, Adamo M, Metra M. November 2023 at a glance: Focus on cardiogenic shock, post-discharge outcomes and cardiomyopathies. Eur J Heart Fail 2023; 25:1887-1890. [PMID: 38091255 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.3096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Tomasoni
- Cardiology and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Cardio-Thoracic Department, Civil Hospitals, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marianna Adamo
- Cardiology and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Cardio-Thoracic Department, Civil Hospitals, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marco Metra
- Cardiology and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Cardio-Thoracic Department, Civil Hospitals, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|