Impact of immunophenotypic characteristics on genetic subgrouping in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Tokyo Children's Cancer Study Group (TCCSG) study L04-16

A review of immunotargeted therapy for Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: making progress in chemotherapy-free regimens

Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (PH + ALL) is the most common cytogenetic abnormality of B-ALL in adults and is associated with poor prognosis. Previously, the only curative treatment option in PH + ALL was allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT). Since 2000, targeted therapy combined with chemotherapy, represented by the tyrosine kinase inhibitor Imatinib, has become the first-line treatment for PH + ALL. Currently, the remission rate and survival rate of Imatinib are superior to those of simple chemotherapy, and it can also improve the efficacy of transplantation. More recently, some innovative immune-targeted therapy greatly improved the prognosis of PH + ALL, such as Blinatumomab and Inotuzumab Ozogamicin. For patients with ABL1 mutations and those who have relapsed or are refractory to other treatments, targeted oral small molecule drugs, monoclonal antibodies, Bispecific T cell Engagers (BiTE), and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells immunotherapy are emerging as potential treatment options. These new therapeutic interventions are changing the treatment landscape for PH + ALL. In summary, this review discusses the current advancements in targeted therapeutic agents shift in the treatment strategy of PH + ALL towards using more tolerable chemotherapy-free induction and consolidation regimens confers better disease outcomes and might obviate the need for HSCT.

Transcriptome analysis of primary adult B-cell lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia identifies pathogenic variants and gene fusions, and predicts subtypes for in depth molecular diagnosis

BACKGROUND

B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is classified into subgroups based on known driver oncogenes and molecular lesions, including translocations and recurrent mutations. However, the current diagnostic tests do not identify subtypes or oncogenic lesions for all B-ALL samples, creating a heterogeneous B-ALL group of unknown subtypes.

METHODS

We sorted primary adult B-ALL cells and performed transcriptome analysis by bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq).

RESULTS

Transcriptomic analysis of an adult B-ALL cohort allowed the classification of four patient samples with subtypes that were not previously revealed by standard gene panels. The leukemia of two patients were of the DUX4 subtype and two were CRLF2+ Ph-like B-ALL. Furthermore, single nucleotide variant analysis detected the oncogenic NRAS-G12D, KRAS-G12D, and KRAS-G13D mutations in three of the patient samples, presenting targetable mutations. Additional oncogenic variants and gene fusions were uncovered, as well as multiple variants in the PDE4DIP gene across five of the patient samples.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate that RNA-seq is an effective tool for precision medicine in B-ALL by providing comprehensive molecular profiling of leukemia cells, identifying subtype and oncogenic lesions, and stratifying patients for appropriate therapy.

Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase expression in different subtypes of childhood B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The lack of expression of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) is frequently associated with KMT2A-rearranged subtype of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, this association has not been investigated extensively in the Asian population. A retrospective analysis of TdT expression in pediatric B-cell ALL (B-ALL) was performed in patients treated using the Taiwan Pediatric Oncology Group (TPOG) ALL 2002 and 2013 protocols. Among the 331 patients with B-ALL, 12 patients showed TdT negativity at initial diagnosis. Among these, eight patients showed KMT2A rearrangement (66.7%). Other patients showing negative TdT expression had ETV6::RUNX1, MEF2D-rearranged, and other B-ALL subtypes. However, in the context of KMT2A-rearranged B-ALL (n = 20), only eight patients showed TdT negativity. The 5-year event-free survival and overall survival of patients with and without TdT expression were 83.8% versus 46.8% (P <0.001) and 86.3% versus 55.4% (P = 0.004), respectively. Moreover, several aberrant markers, such as CD2, CD56, CD7, and CD117, were rarely expressed in the B-ALL samples, and if expressed, they were enriched in specific genetic subtypes. The results of this study indicate that immunophenotypic features are correlated with specific genetic subtypes of childhood B-ALL.

Immunophenotypic portrait of leukemia-associated-phenotype markers in B acute lymphoblastic leukemia

BACKGROUND

Multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) is an essential diagnostic tool in B acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B ALL) to determine the B-lineage affiliation of the blast population and to define their complete immunophenotypic profile. Most MFC strategies used in routine laboratories include leukemia-associated phenotype (LAP) markers, whose expression profiles can be difficult to interpret. The aim of our study was to reach a better understanding of 7 LAP markers' landscape in B ALL: CD9, CD21, CD66c, CD58, CD81, CD123, and NG2.

METHODS

Using a 10-color MFC approach, we evaluated the level of expression of 7 LAP markers including CD9, CD21, CD66c, CD58, CD81, CD123, and NG2, at the surface of normal peripheral blood leukocytes (n = 10 healthy donors), of normal precursor B regenerative cells (n = 40 uninvolved bone marrow samples) and of lymphoblasts (n = 100 peripheral blood samples or bone marrow samples from B ALL patients at diagnosis). The expression profile of B lymphoblasts was analyzed according the presence or absence of recurrent cytogenetic aberrations. The prognostic value of the 7 LAP markers was examined using Maxstat R algorithm.

RESULTS

In order to help the interpretation of the MFC data in routine laboratories, we first determined internal positive and negative populations among normal leukocytes for each of the seven evaluated LAP markers. Second, their profile of expression was evaluated in normal B cell differentiation in comparison with B lymphoblasts to establish a synopsis of their expression in normal hematogones. We then evaluated the frequency of expression of these LAP markers at the surface of B lymphoblasts at diagnosis of B ALL. CD9 was expressed in 60% of the cases, CD21 in only 3% of the cases, CD58 in 96% of the cases, CD66c in 45% of the cases, CD81 in 97% of the cases, CD123 in 72% of the cases, and NG2 in only 2% of the cases. We confirmed the interest of the CD81/CD58 MFI expression ratio as a way to discriminate hematogones from lymphoblasts. We observed a significant lower expression of CD9 and of CD81 at the surface of B lymphoblasts with a t(9;22)(BCR-ABL) in comparison with B lymphoblasts without any recurrent cytogenetic alteration (p = 0.0317 and p = 0.0011, respectively) and with B lymphoblasts harboring other cytogenetic recurrent abnormalities (p = 0.0032 and p < 0.0001, respectively). B lymphoblasts with t(1;19) at diagnosis significantly overexpressed CD81 when compared with B lymphoblasts with other recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities or without any recurrent alteration (p = 0.0001). An overexpression of CD58 was also observed in the cases harboring this abnormal cytogenetic event, when compared with B lymphoblasts with other recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities (p = 0.030), or without any recurrent alteration (p = 0.0002). In addition, a high expression of CD123, of CD58 and of CD81 was associated with a favorable prognosis in our cohort of pediatric and young adult B ALL patients. We finally built a risk score based on the expression of these 3 LAP markers, this scoring approach being able to split these patients into a high-risk group (17%) and a better outcome group (83%, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The complexity of the phenotypic signature of lymphoblasts at diagnosis of B ALL is illustrated by the variability in the expression of LAP antigens. Knowledge of the expression levels of these markers in normal leukocytes and during normal B differentiation is crucial for an optimal interpretation of diagnostic cytometry results and serves as a basis for the biological follow-up of B ALL.

Updates on lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma classification and minimal/measurable residual disease analysis

Lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (ALL/LBL), especially certain subtypes, continues to confer morbidity and mortality despite significant therapeutic advances. The pathologic classification of ALL/LBL, especially that of B-ALL, has recently substantially expanded with the identification of several distinct and prognostically important genetic drivers. These discoveries are reflected in both current classification systems, the World Health Organization (WHO) 5th edition and the new International Consensus Classification (ICC). In this article, novel subtypes of B-ALL are reviewed, including DUX4, MEF2D and ZNF384-rearranged B-ALL; the rare pediatric entity B-ALL with TLF3::HLF, now added to the classifications, is discussed; updates to the category of B-ALL with BCR::ABL1-like features (Ph-like B-ALL) are summarized; and emerging genetic subtypes of T-ALL are presented. The second half of the article details current approaches to minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) detection in B-ALL and T-ALL and presents anticipated challenges to current approaches in the burgeoning era of antigen-directed immunotherapy.

Emerging molecular subtypes and therapies in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Tremendous strides have been made in the molecular and cytogenetic classification of acute lymphoblastic leukemia based on gene expression profiling data, leading to an expansion of entities in the recent International Consensus Classification (ICC) of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemias and 2022 WHO Classification of Tumours: Haematolymphoid Tumors, 5th edition. This increased diagnostic and therapeutic complexity can be overwhelming, and this review compares nomenclature differences between the ICC and WHO 5th edition publications, compiles key features of each entity, and provides a diagnostic algorithmic approach. In covering B-lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), we divided the entities into established (those present in the revised 4th edition WHO) and novel (those added to either the ICC or WHO 5th edition) groups. The established B-ALL entities include B-ALL with BCR::ABL1 fusion, BCR::ABL1-like features, KMT2A rearrangement, ETV6::RUNX1 rearrangement, high hyperdiploidy, hypodiploidy (focusing on near haploid and low hypodiploid), IGH::IL3 rearrangement, TCF3::PBX1 rearrangement, and iAMP21. The novel B-ALL entities include B-ALL with MYC rearrangement; DUX4 rearrangement; MEF2D rearrangement; ZNF384 or ZNF362 rearrangement, NUTM1 rearrangement; HLF rearrangement; UBTF::ATXN7L3/PAN3,CDX2; mutated IKZF1 N159Y; mutated PAX5 P80R; ETV6::RUNX1-like features; PAX5 alteration; mutated ZEB2 (p.H1038R)/IGH::CEBPE; ZNF384 rearranged-like; KMT2A-rearranged-like; and CRLF2 rearrangement (non-Ph-like). Classification of T-ALL is complex with some variability in how the subtypes are defined in recent literature. It was classified as early T-precursor lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma and T-ALL, NOS in the WHO revised 4th edition and WHO 5th edition. The ICC added an entity into early T-cell precursor ALL, BCL11B-activated, and also added provisional entities subclassified based on transcription factor families that are aberrantly activated.

Modern Classification and Management of Pediatric B-cell Leukemia and Lymphoma

Although pediatric hematopathology overlaps with that of adults, certain forms of leukemia and lymphoma, and many types of reactive conditions affecting the bone marrow and lymph nodes, are unique to children. As part of this series focused on lymphomas, this article (1) details the novel subtypes of lymphoblastic leukemia seen primarily in children and described since the 2017 World Health Organization classification and (2) discusses unique concepts in pediatric hematopathology, including nomenclature changes and evaluation of surgical margins in selected lymphomas.

B-lineage antigens that are useful to substitute CD19 for minimal residual disease monitoring in B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia after CD19 targeting

BACKGROUND

The potential loss of CD19 during targeted treatment of B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) can hamper flow cytometric minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring. In the current study, we present expression data for antigens that are candidates for CD19 substitution: surface CD22, CD24, CD10, and intracellular (i) CD79a.

METHODS

Bone marrow samples from 519 consecutive children (below 18 y.o.) with primary BCP-ALL were studied with a focus on expression of CD19, CD10, CD22, CD24, and iCD79a. As these antigens are planned to be used as substitutions for CD19 for primary B cell gating, only total expression on the leukemic population (≥95% cells) was considered appropriate.

RESULTS

It was found that each of these antigens is totally expressed in nearly 90% of patients. For each single marker, a subgroup of patients without complete positivity presented with BCP-ALL harboring diverse cytogenetic and molecular genetic aberrations. Based on expression data, we have developed algorithm of simultaneous application of these antigens for initial B-lineage compartment gating, that is applicable for nearly all patients after CD19 targeting.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the addition of CD22, CD24, and iCD79a to the conventional antibody panel and their application together with CD10 allow for the identification of B-lineage compartment including residual tumor blasts, for MFC-MRD searching in virtually all patients with BCP-ALL after CD19-directed treatment.

Immunophenotypic characteristics of ZNF384 rearrangement compared with BCR-ABL1, KMT2A rearrangement, and other adult B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia

BACKGROUND

ZNF384 rearrangement has been recently identified as a new subtype of B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). However, comprehensive studies clarifying immunophenotypic features and discriminating them from non-ZNF384 in adult BCP-ALL remain scarce to date.

METHODS

Flow cytometric assessments were retrospectively performed in 43 patients with ZNF384 rearrangement, 45 with BCR-ABL1, 29 with KMT2A rearrangement and 44 with other BCP-ALL in the analysis cohort.

RESULTS

CD33- and CD13-positive frequencies were significantly higher in patients with ZNF384 rearrangement than in those with non-ZNF384; however, no significant difference was observed in CD10- and CD123-positive frequencies. Analysis of antigen-positive cell proportion and median fluorescence intensity (MFI) further indicated that patients with ZNF384 rearrangement had significantly lower CD10 and higher CD33, CD13, and CD123 proportion and MFI. However, compared with KMT2A rearrangement, the CD10 expression in patients with ZNF384 rearrangement was higher, with the median percentage and MFI of 36.16 (3.63-94.79)% versus 4.53 (0.03-21.00)%, and 4.50 (0.86-32.26) versus 2.06 (0.87-4.04), respectively (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, compared with BCR-ABL1 and other BCP-ALL, ZNF384 rearrangement had significantly higher CD33 and CD13 proportion and MFI (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.05, respectively). In addition, higher CD123 proportion and MFI in ZNF384 rearrangement than those in the other three groups were reported for the first time (p < 0.01). A flow cytometry scoring system, including CD10%, CD33MFI, CD13%, and CD123MFI, was proposed and verified to predict ZNF384 rearrangement with high sensitivity and specificity, that is, 76.74% and 91.53% in the analysis and 87.50% and 91.30% in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The multiparameter immunophenotypic scoring system could suggest ZNF384 rearrangement.

High CD34 surface expression in BCP-ALL predicts poor induction therapy response and is associated with altered expression of genes related to cell migration and adhesion

Minimal residual disease (MRD) constitutes the most important prognostic factor in B‐cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP‐ALL). Flow cytometry is widely used in MRD assessment, yet little is known regarding the effect of different immunophenotypic subsets on outcome. In this study of 200 BCP‐ALL patients, we found that a CD34‐positive, CD38 dim‐positive, nTdT dim‐positive immunophenotype on the leukemic blasts was associated with poor induction therapy response and predicted an MRD level at the end of induction therapy (EOI) of ≥ 0.001. CD34 expression was strongly and positively associated with EOI MRD, whereas CD34‐negative patients had a low relapse risk. Further, CD34 expression increased from diagnosis to relapse. CD34 is a stemness‐associated cell‐surface molecule, possibly involved in cell adhesion/migration or survival. Accordingly, genes associated with stemness were overrepresented among the most upregulated genes in CD34‐positive leukemias, and protein–protein interaction networks showed an overrepresentation of genes associated with cell migration, cell adhesion, and negative regulation of apoptosis. The present work is the first to demonstrate a CD34‐negative immunophenotype as a good prognostic factor in ALL, whereas high CD34 expression is associated with poor therapy response and an altered gene expression profile reminiscent of migrating cancer stem‐like cells.

Gene Rearrangement Detection in Pediatric Leukemia

The detection of gene rearrangements in pediatric leukemia is an essential component of the work-up, with implications for accurate diagnosis, proper risk stratification, and therapeutic decisions, including the use of targeted therapies. The traditional methods of karyotype and fluorescence in situ hybridization are still valuable, but many new assays are also available, with different strengths and weaknesses. These assays include next-generation sequencing-based assays that have the potential for highly multiplexed and/or unbiased detection of rearrangements.

Comprehensive Overview of Gene Rearrangements in Childhood T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) is a relevant form of childhood neoplasm, as it accounts for over 80% of all leukaemia cases. T-cell ALL constitutes a genetically heterogeneous cancer derived from T-lymphoid progenitors. The diagnosis of T-ALL is based on morphologic, immunophenotypic, cytogenetic, and molecular features, thus the results are used for patient stratification. Due to the expression of surface and intracellular antigens, several subtypes of T-ALL can be distinguished. Although the aetiology of T-ALL remains unclear, a wide spectrum of rearrangements and mutations affecting crucial signalling pathways has been described so far. Due to intensive chemotherapy regimens and supportive care, overall cure rates of more than 80% in paediatric T-ALL patients have been accomplished. However, improved knowledge of the mechanisms of relapse, drug resistance, and determination of risk factors are crucial for patients in the high-risk group. Even though some residual disease studies have allowed the optimization of therapy, the identification of novel diagnostic and prognostic markers is required to individualize therapy. The following review summarizes our current knowledge about genetic abnormalities in paediatric patients with T-ALL. As molecular biology techniques provide insights into the biology of cancer, our study focuses on new potential therapeutic targets and predictive factors which may improve the outcome of young patients with T-ALL.

Emerging molecular subtypes and therapeutic targets in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia

B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) is characterized by genetic alterations with high heterogeneity. Precise subtypes with distinct genomic and/or gene expression patterns have been recently revealed using high-throughput sequencing technology. Most of these profiles are associated with recurrent non-overlapping rearrangements or hotspot point mutations that are analogous to the established subtypes, such as DUX4 rearrangements, MEF2D rearrangements, ZNF384/ZNF362 rearrangements, NUTM1 rearrangements, BCL2/MYC and/or BCL6 rearrangements, ETV6-RUNX1-like gene expression, PAX5alt (diverse PAX5 alterations, including rearrangements, intragenic amplifications, or mutations), and hotspot mutations PAX5 (p.Pro80Arg) with biallelic PAX5 alterations, IKZF1 (p.Asn159Tyr), and ZEB2 (p.His1038Arg). These molecular subtypes could be classified by gene expression patterns with RNA-seq technology. Refined molecular classification greatly improved the treatment strategy. Multiagent therapy regimens, including target inhibitors (e.g., imatinib), immunomodulators, monoclonal antibodies, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, are transforming the clinical practice from chemotherapy drugs to personalized medicine in the field of risk-directed disease management. We provide an update on our knowledge of emerging molecular subtypes and therapeutic targets in BCP-ALL.

DUX Hunting-Clinical Features and Diagnostic Challenges Associated with DUX4-Rearranged Leukaemia

Simple Summary

DUX4-rearrangement (DUX4r) is a recently discovered recurrent genomic lesion reported in 4–7% of childhood B cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (B-ALL) cases. This subtype has favourable outcomes, especially in children and adolescents treated with intensive chemotherapy. The fusion most commonly links the hypervariable IGH gene to DUX4 a gene located within the D4Z4 macrosatellite repeat on chromosome 4. DUX4r is cryptic to most standard diagnostic techniques, and difficult to identify even with next generation sequencing assays. This review summarises the clinical features and molecular genetics of DUX4r B-ALL and proposes prospective new diagnostic methods.

Abstract

DUX4-rearrangement (DUX4r) is a recently discovered recurrent genomic lesion reported in 4–7% of childhood B cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (B-ALL) cases. This subtype has favourable outcomes, especially in children and adolescents treated with intensive chemotherapy. The fusion most commonly links the hypervariable IGH gene to DUX4 a gene located within the D4Z4 macrosatellite repeat on chromosome 4, with a homologous polymorphic repeat on chromosome 10. DUX4r is cryptic to most standard diagnostic techniques, and difficult to identify even with next generation sequencing assays. This review summarises the clinical features and molecular genetics of DUX4r B-ALL and proposes prospective new diagnostic methods.