A comparison of methods sensitive to interactions with small main effects

Modified entropy-based procedure detects gene-gene-interactions in unconventional genetic models

BACKGROUND

Since it is assumed that genetic interactions play an important role in understanding the mechanisms of complex diseases, different statistical approaches have been suggested in recent years for this task. One interesting approach is the entropy-based IGENT method by Kwon et al. that promises an efficient detection of main effects and interaction effects simultaneously. However, a modification is required if the aim is to only detect interaction effects.

METHODS

Based on the IGENT method, we present a modification that leads to a conditional mutual information based approach under the condition of linkage equilibrium. The modified estimator is investigated in a comprehensive simulation based on five genetic interaction models and applied to real data from the genome-wide association study by the North American Rheumatoid Arthritis Consortium (NARAC).

RESULTS

The presented modification of IGENT controls the type I error in all simulated constellations. Furthermore, it provides high power for detecting pure interactions specifically on unconventional genetic models both in simulation and real data.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed method uses the IGENT software, which is free available, simple and fast, and detects pure interactions on unconventional genetic models. Our results demonstrate that this modification is an attractive complement to established analysis methods.

Identification of epistasis loci underlying rice flowering time by controlling population stratification and polygenic effect

Flowering time is an important agronomic trait, attributed by multiple genes, gene-gene interactions and environmental factors. Population stratification and polygenic effects might confound genetic effects of the causal loci underlying this complex trait. We proposed a two-step approach for detecting epistasis interactions underlying rice flowering time by accounting population structure and polygenic effects. Simulation studies showed that the approach used in this study performs better than classical and PC-linear approaches in terms of powers and false discovery rates in the case of population stratification and polygenic effects. Whole genome epistasis analyses identified 589 putative genetic interactions for flowering time. Eighteen of these interactions are located within 10 kilobases of regions of known protein-protein interactions. Thirty-seven SNPs near to twenty-five genes involve in rice or/and Arabidopsis (orthologue) flowering pathway. Bioinformatics analysis showed that 66.55% pairwise genes of the identified interactions (392 out of the 589 interactions) have similarity in various genomic features. Moreover, significant numbers of detected epistatic genes have high expression in different floral tissues. Our findings highlight the importance of epistasis analysis by controlling population stratification and polygenic effect and provided novel insights into the genetic architecture of rice flowering which could assist breeding programmes.

Machine Learning and Radiogenomics: Lessons Learned and Future Directions

Due to the rapid increase in the availability of patient data, there is significant interest in precision medicine that could facilitate the development of a personalized treatment plan for each patient on an individual basis. Radiation oncology is particularly suited for predictive machine learning (ML) models due to the enormous amount of diagnostic data used as input and therapeutic data generated as output. An emerging field in precision radiation oncology that can take advantage of ML approaches is radiogenomics, which is the study of the impact of genomic variations on the sensitivity of normal and tumor tissue to radiation. Currently, patients undergoing radiotherapy are treated using uniform dose constraints specific to the tumor and surrounding normal tissues. This is suboptimal in many ways. First, the dose that can be delivered to the target volume may be insufficient for control but is constrained by the surrounding normal tissue, as dose escalation can lead to significant morbidity and rare. Second, two patients with nearly identical dose distributions can have substantially different acute and late toxicities, resulting in lengthy treatment breaks and suboptimal control, or chronic morbidities leading to poor quality of life. Despite significant advances in radiogenomics, the magnitude of the genetic contribution to radiation response far exceeds our current understanding of individual risk variants. In the field of genomics, ML methods are being used to extract harder-to-detect knowledge, but these methods have yet to fully penetrate radiogenomics. Hence, the goal of this publication is to provide an overview of ML as it applies to radiogenomics. We begin with a brief history of radiogenomics and its relationship to precision medicine. We then introduce ML and compare it to statistical hypothesis testing to reflect on shared lessons and to avoid common pitfalls. Current ML approaches to genome-wide association studies are examined. The application of ML specifically to radiogenomics is next presented. We end with important lessons for the proper integration of ML into radiogenomics.

Primer in Genetics and Genomics, Article 7-Multifactorial Concepts: Gene-Gene Interactions

Most common disorders affecting human health are not attributable to simple Mendelian (single-gene) inheritance patterns. Rather, the risk of developing a complex disease is often the result of interactions across genes, whereby one gene modifies the phenotype of another gene. These types of interactions can occur between two or more genes and are referred to as epistasis. There are five major types of epistatic interactions, but in human genetics, additive epistasis is most often discussed and includes both positive and negative subtypes. Detecting epistatic interactions can be quite difficult because seemingly unrelated genes can interact with and influence each other. As a result of this complexity, statistical geneticists are constantly developing new methods to enhance detection, but there are disadvantages to each proposed method. In this article, we explore the concept of epistasis, discuss different types of epistatic interactions, and provide a brief introduction to statistical methods researchers use to uncover sets of epistatic interactions. Then, we consider Alzheimer's disease as an exemplar for a disease with epistatic effects. Finally, we provide helpful resources, where nurses can learn more about epistasis in order to incorporate these methods into their own program of research.

A roadmap to multifactor dimensionality reduction methods

Complex diseases are defined to be determined by multiple genetic and environmental factors alone as well as in interactions. To analyze interactions in genetic data, many statistical methods have been suggested, with most of them relying on statistical regression models. Given the known limitations of classical methods, approaches from the machine-learning community have also become attractive. From this latter family, a fast-growing collection of methods emerged that are based on the Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction (MDR) approach. Since its first introduction, MDR has enjoyed great popularity in applications and has been extended and modified multiple times. Based on a literature search, we here provide a systematic and comprehensive overview of these suggested methods. The methods are described in detail, and the availability of implementations is listed. Most recent approaches offer to deal with large-scale data sets and rare variants, which is why we expect these methods to even gain in popularity.

Evaluating methods for modeling epistasis networks with application to head and neck cancer

Epistasis helps to explain how multiple single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) interact to cause disease. A variety of tools have been developed to detect epistasis. In this article, we explore the strengths and weaknesses of an information theory approach for detecting epistasis and compare it to the logistic regression approach through simulations. We consider several scenarios to simulate the involvement of SNPs in an epistasis network with respect to linkage disequilibrium patterns among them and the presence or absence of main and interaction effects. We conclude that the information theory approach more efficiently detects interaction effects when main effects are absent, whereas, in general, the logistic regression approach is appropriate in all scenarios but results in higher false positives. We compute epistasis networks for SNPs in the FSD1L gene using a two-phase head and neck cancer genome-wide association study involving 2,185 cases and 4,507 controls to demonstrate the practical application of the methods.

Detecting epistasis in human complex traits

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have become the focus of the statistical analysis of complex traits in humans, successfully shedding light on several aspects of genetic architecture and biological aetiology. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are usually modelled as having additive, cumulative and independent effects on the phenotype. Although evidently a useful approach, it is often argued that this is not a realistic biological model and that epistasis (that is, the statistical interaction between SNPs) should be included. The purpose of this Review is to summarize recent directions in methodology for detecting epistasis and to discuss evidence of the role of epistasis in human complex trait variation. We also discuss the relevance of epistasis in the context of GWASs and potential hazards in the interpretation of statistical interaction terms.

An omnibus permutation test on ensembles of two-locus analyses can detect pure epistasis and genetic heterogeneity in genome-wide association studies

This article presents the ability of an omnibus permutation test on ensembles of two-locus analyses (2LOmb) to detect pure epistasis in the presence of genetic heterogeneity. The performance of 2LOmb is evaluated in various simulation scenarios covering two independent causes of complex disease where each cause is governed by a purely epistatic interaction. Different scenarios are set up by varying the number of available single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in data, number of causative SNPs and ratio of case samples from two affected groups. The simulation results indicate that 2LOmb outperforms multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) and random forest (RF) techniques in terms of a low number of output SNPs and a high number of correctly-identified causative SNPs. Moreover, 2LOmb is capable of identifying the number of independent interactions in tractable computational time and can be used in genome-wide association studies. 2LOmb is subsequently applied to a type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) data set, which is collected from a UK population by the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (WTCCC). After screening for SNPs that locate within or near genes and exhibit no marginal single-locus effects, the T1D data set is reduced to 95,991 SNPs from 12,146 genes. The 2LOmb search in the reduced T1D data set reveals that 12 SNPs, which can be divided into two independent sets, are associated with the disease. The first SNP set consists of three SNPs from MUC21 (mucin 21, cell surface associated), three SNPs from MUC22 (mucin 22), two SNPs from PSORS1C1 (psoriasis susceptibility 1 candidate 1) and one SNP from TCF19 (transcription factor 19). A four-locus interaction between these four genes is also detected. The second SNP set consists of three SNPs from ATAD1 (ATPase family, AAA domain containing 1). Overall, the findings indicate the detection of pure epistasis in the presence of genetic heterogeneity and provide an alternative explanation for the aetiology of T1D in the UK population.