Double-edged role of resource competition in gene expression noise and control

Enhancing circuit stability under growth feedback with supplementary repressive regulation

The field of synthetic biology and biosystems engineering increasingly acknowledges the need for a holistic design approach that incorporates circuit-host interactions into the design process. Engineered circuits are not isolated entities but inherently entwined with the dynamic host environment. One such circuit-host interaction, 'growth feedback', results when modifications in host growth patterns influence the operation of gene circuits. The growth-mediated effects can range from growth-dependent elevation in protein/mRNA dilution rate to changes in resource reallocation within the cell, which can lead to complete functional collapse in complex circuits. To achieve robust circuit performance, synthetic biologists employ a variety of control mechanisms to stabilize and insulate circuit behavior against growth changes. Here we propose a simple strategy by incorporating one repressive edge in a growth-sensitive bistable circuit. Through both simulation and in vitro experimentation, we demonstrate how this additional repressive node stabilizes protein levels and increases the robustness of a bistable circuit in response to growth feedback. We propose the incorporation of repressive links in gene circuits as a control strategy for desensitizing gene circuits against growth fluctuations.

Negatively Competitive Incoherent Feedforward Loops Mitigate Winner-Take-All Resource Competition

The effects of host resource limitations on the function of synthetic gene circuits have gained significant attention over the past years. Hosts, having evolved resource capacities optimal for their own genome, have been repeatedly demonstrated to suffer from the added burden of synthetic genetic programs, which may in return pose deleterious effects on the circuit's function. Three resource controller archetypes have been proposed previously to mitigate resource distribution problems in dynamic circuits: the local controller, the global controller, and a "negatively competitive" regulatory (NCR) controller that utilizes synthetic competition to combat resource competition. The dynamics of negative feedback forms of these controllers have been previously investigated, and here we extend the analysis of these resource allocation strategies to the incoherent feedforward loop (iFFL) topology. We demonstrate that the three iFFL controllers can attenuate Winner-Take-All resource competition between two bistable switches. We uncover that the parameters associated with the synthetic competition in the NCR iFFL controller are paramount to its increased efficacy over the local controller type, while the global controllers demonstrate to be relatively ineffectual. Interestingly, unlike the negative feedback counterpart topologies, iFFL controllers exhibit a unique coupling of switch activation thresholds which we term the "coactivation threshold shift" effect. Finally, we demonstrate that a nearly fully orthogonal set of bistable switches could be achieved by pairing an NCR controller with an appropriate level of controller resource consumption.

Model-Based Investigation of the Relationship between Regulation Level and Pulse Property of I1-FFL Gene Circuits

Mathematical models are powerful tools in guiding the construction of synthetic biological circuits, given their capability of accurately capturing and predicting circuit dynamics. Recent innovations in RNA technology have enabled the development of a variety of new tools for regulating gene expression at both the transcription and translation levels. However, the effects of different regulation levels on the circuit dynamics remain largely unexplored. In this study, we focus on the type 1 incoherent feed-forward loop (I1-FFL) gene circuit with four different variations (TX, TL, HY-1, HY-2), to investigate how regulation at the transcription and translation levels affect the circuit dynamics. We develop a mechanistic model for each of the four circuits and deploy sensitivity analysis to investigate the circuits' dynamics in terms of pulse generation. Based on the analysis, we observe that the repression regulation mechanism dominates the characteristics of the pulse as compared to the activation regulation mechanism and find that the I1-FFL with transcription repression has a higher chance of generating a pulse meeting the desired criteria. The experimental results in Escherichia coli also confirm our findings from the computational analysis. We expect our findings to facilitate future experimental construction of gene circuits with insights on the selection of appropriate transcription and translation regulation tools.