1
|
Naunton Morgan B, Windle G, Lamers C. iSupport for rare dementias: a mixed-methods non-randomised feasibility study of an online self-help programme for carers. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2025; 11:58. [PMID: 40307942 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-025-01639-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/07/2025] [Indexed: 05/02/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND iSupport for dementia carers is an online education and self-care programme developed by the World Health Organisation for carers of people with the most common forms of dementia (Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia). iSupport for rare dementias (RDC) is the first adaptation designed specifically to address the challenges faced by carers of individuals with rare dementias (frontotemporal dementia, posterior cortical atrophy, primary progressive aphasia or Lewy body dementia). METHODS A 12-week mixed-methods non-randomised feasibility study assessed the feasibility of recruitment and participant retention, the feasibility of outcome measures and the acceptability of iSupport RDC. Participants were recruited through the Rare Dementia Support Network (target N = 30). Data were collected through online interviews and self-report, including pre and post-intervention measures of depression, anxiety, burden and resilience. A modified version of the NoMAD questionnaire evaluated acceptability of implementation. Scores range from 0 to 4 with > / = 2.5 indicating acceptability. Usability was assessed through self-report and data from Blackboard. RESULTS Thirty-four (13 males and 21 females) carers of people with frontotemporal dementia, posterior cortical atrophy, primary progressive aphasia or Lewy body dementia consented to the study and given access to iSupport RDC, hosted online by Blackboard Learn. Their ethnicity was reported as white and their mean age was 64.2 (range 35-86). N = 24 completed pre and post outcome measures, N = 10 completed pre-intervention and then withdrew, n = 4 reporting technical difficulties (70.6% completion rate). There were no missing responses. N = 20 completed 3 of the 5 iSupport RDC modules; n = 13 completed five. N = 4 could not access due to technical difficulties. Technical difficulties meant the data from Blackboard Learn were not obtained. The NoMAD total score (3.5) indicated iSupport RDC was acceptable. Qualitative analysis from n = 19 participants revealed themes of 'technical difficulties' (n = 10), 'useful and informative' (n = 7), and 'provide at point of diagnosis' (n = 5). CONCLUSIONS Recruitment targets were met but there were limitations in sample diversity. The extent of attrition warrants strategies to ensure retention to future studies, including testing online interventions on different internet browsers and operating systems. The favourable response to iSupport RDC from the participants indicates its potential as a valuable resource for supporting carers dealing with rare dementias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethan Naunton Morgan
- School of Psychology and Sports Science, Brigantia Building, Bangor University, Penrallt Road, Bangor, UK.
| | - Gill Windle
- School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Carolien Lamers
- North Wales Clinical Psychology Programme, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Roberts JR, MacLeod CA, Windle G, Hoare Z, Stott J, Sullivan MP, Camic PM, Brotherhood EV, Crutch SJ. The psychometric properties of a new outcome measure of resilience for people living with dementia: The Bangor Dementia Resilience Scale. BMC Psychol 2025; 13:388. [PMID: 40235011 PMCID: PMC12001495 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-025-02695-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2025] [Indexed: 04/17/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychometrically sound resilience outcome measures are essential to establish how health and care services or interventions can enhance the resilience of people living with dementia. In response to a lack of resilience outcome measures designed specifically with, and for, people living with dementia, this research builds on several stages of measurement development and evaluates the psychometric properties of a new outcome measure of resilience for people living with dementia. METHODS We aimed to recruit 185 people aged 18 + living with dementia. An online survey containing demographic questions, the draft 37-item resilience measure, the 7-item Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD- 7) and the 5-item Canterbury Wellbeing Scale was widely shared in the UK. Three people living with dementia piloted the survey before recruitment commenced and gave suggestions for improvement. Exploratory factor analysis was applied to the draft resilience measure and the construct validity and internal consistency ascertained. Convergent validity with other measures was tested. RESULTS Minor changes were made to the survey following piloting to help people with dementia. The survey was completed by 193 participants, aged 47-93 (M = 69.9; SD = 9.5), 58% male, and living with a range of dementia diagnoses. The exploratory factor analysis led to a final 19-item measure (Chronbach's Alpha = 0.85) with 5-factors underlying resilience: 'Outlook', 'Adaptation', 'Acceptance', 'community and peer support' and 'family and friends'. The new resilience measure demonstrated convergent validity with well-being (r = 0.49, p < 0.001) and anxiety (r = - 0.28, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This study presents preliminary field-testing and validation of the Bangor Dementia Resilience Scale, a new psychometrically sound resilience measure for people living with mild to moderate dementia. The scale may be a valuable tool for practitioners to provide strengths-based and person-centred support to maintain and enhance the resilience of people living with dementia, and evaluating the extent to which health and social care services may improve resilience. Given the global policy focus to support people with dementia to live as well as possible, the new scale has international significance for translation and cultural adaptation by other countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Rhiannon Roberts
- DSDC Wales Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Ardudwy, Normal Site, Bangor, LL57 2PZ, UK.
| | - Catherine Anne MacLeod
- Centre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, UK
| | - Gill Windle
- DSDC Wales Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Ardudwy, Normal Site, Bangor, LL57 2PZ, UK
| | - Zoe Hoare
- DSDC Wales Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Ardudwy, Normal Site, Bangor, LL57 2PZ, UK
| | - Joshua Stott
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London (UCL), London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Mary Pat Sullivan
- Faculty of Education and Professional Studies, School of Social Work, Nipissing University, Nipissing, North Bay, ON, Canada
| | - Paul M Camic
- Dementia Research Centre, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London (UCL), London, WC1N 3AR, UK
| | - Emilie V Brotherhood
- Dementia Research Centre, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London (UCL), London, WC1N 3AR, UK
| | - Sebastian J Crutch
- Dementia Research Centre, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London (UCL), London, WC1N 3AR, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Taylor B, Bocchetta M, Shand C, Todd EG, Chokesuwattanaskul A, Crutch SJ, Warren JD, Rohrer JD, Hardy CJD, Oxtoby NP. Data-driven neuroanatomical subtypes of primary progressive aphasia. Brain 2025; 148:955-968. [PMID: 39374849 PMCID: PMC11884653 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awae314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2024] [Revised: 08/01/2024] [Accepted: 09/08/2024] [Indexed: 10/09/2024] Open
Abstract
The primary progressive aphasias are rare, language-led dementias, with three main variants: semantic, non-fluent/agrammatic and logopenic. Although the semantic variant has a clear neuroanatomical profile, the non-fluent/agrammatic and logopenic variants are difficult to discriminate from neuroimaging. Previous phenotype-driven studies have characterized neuroanatomical profiles of each variant on MRI. In this work, we used a machine learning algorithm known as SuStaIn to discover data-driven neuroanatomical 'subtype' progression profiles and performed an in-depth subtype-phenotype analysis to characterize the heterogeneity of primary progressive aphasia. Our study included 270 participants with primary progressive aphasia seen for research in the UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology Dementia Research Centre, with follow-up scans available for 137 participants. This dataset included individuals diagnosed with all three main variants (semantic, n = 94; non-fluent/agrammatic, n = 109; logopenic, n = 51) and individuals with unspecified primary progressive aphasia (n = 16). A dataset of 66 patients (semantic, n = 37; non-fluent/agrammatic, n = 29) from the ARTFL LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD) Research Study was used to validate our results. MRI scans were segmented, and SuStaIn was used on 19 regions of interest to identify neuroanatomical profiles independent of the diagnosis. We assessed the assignment of subtypes and stages, in addition to their longitudinal consistency. We discovered four neuroanatomical subtypes of primary progressive aphasia, labelled S1 (left temporal), S2 (insula), S3 (temporoparietal) and S4 (frontoparietal), exhibiting robustness to statistical scrutiny. S1 was correlated strongly with the semantic variant, whereas S2, S3 and S4 showed mixed associations with the logopenic and non-fluent/agrammatic variants. Notably, S3 displayed a neuroanatomical signature akin to a logopenic-only signature, yet a significant proportion of logopenic cases were allocated to S2. The non-fluent/agrammatic variant demonstrated diverse associations with S2, S3 and S4. No clear relationship emerged between any of the neuroanatomical subtypes and the unspecified cases. At first follow-up, subtype assignment was stable for 84% of patients, and stage assignment was stable for 91.9% of patients. We partially validated our findings in the ALLFTD dataset, finding comparable qualitative patterns. Our study, leveraging machine learning on a large primary progressive aphasia dataset, delineated four distinct neuroanatomical patterns. Our findings suggest that separable spatiotemporal neuroanatomical phenotypes do exist within the primary progressive aphasia spectrum, but that these are noisy, particularly for the non-fluent/agrammatic non-fluent/agrammatic and logopenic variants. Furthermore, these phenotypes do not always conform to standard formulations of clinico-anatomical correlation. Understanding the multifaceted profiles of the disease, encompassing neuroanatomical, molecular, clinical and cognitive dimensions, has potential implications for clinical decision support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatrice Taylor
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London WC1V 6LJ, UK
| | - Martina Bocchetta
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, UK
| | - Cameron Shand
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London WC1V 6LJ, UK
| | - Emily G Todd
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, UK
| | - Anthipa Chokesuwattanaskul
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, UK
| | - Sebastian J Crutch
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, UK
| | - Jason D Warren
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, UK
| | - Jonathan D Rohrer
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, UK
| | - Chris J D Hardy
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, UK
| | - Neil P Oxtoby
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London WC1V 6LJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Volkmer A, Cross L, Highton L, Jackson C, Smith C, Brotherhood E, Harding EV, Mummery C, Rohrer J, Weil R, Yong K, Crutch S, Hardy CJD. 'Communication is difficult': Speech, language and communication needs of people with young onset or rarer forms of non-language led dementia. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2024; 59:1553-1577. [PMID: 38329409 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.13018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, Lewy body dementia, posterior cortical atrophy and young onset Alzheimer's disease may experience language and communication difficulties. However, the role of speech and language interventions for people with these non-language led dementias has received little attention. AIMS This study aimed to explore the experiences and perspectives of people living with these conditions, and their families, regarding their language and communication difficulties and how speech and language therapy could address these needs. METHODS This study employed a qualitative design to explore the experiences of people living with or caring for somebody with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, Lewy body dementia, posterior cortical atrophy or young onset Alzheimer's disease, and to understand their opinions about speech and language therapy. Participants were recruited from a support service connected to a dementia clinic to attend one of five focus group meetings. Videorecorded focus groups and interviews were transcribed, and reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse data from people affected by each type of dementia. RESULTS A total of 25 participants were recruited to the study, with representation across the different forms of non-language led dementias. The four main themes identified were: (1) communication difficulties as a key difficulty, (2) loss and loneliness, (3) speech and language therapy, and (4) the role of the caregiver. Sixteen subthemes were also identified which highlighted individual issues across disease types. DISCUSSION Although all the forms of dementia studied here are not considered to be language-led, people with these conditions and/or their care partners identified speech, language and communication as common challenges. These communication difficulties were reported to have a negative impact on their social participation and mental health and participants felt speech and language interventions could help. There is a need for research exploring speech and language interventions developed for and with people with non-language led dementias and their care partners, to ensure they meet the needs of the people they are designed for. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS What is already known on the subject People with primary progressive aphasia present with speech, language and communication difficulties, and several speech and language interventions have been developed to meet the needs of this population. However, people with non-language led dementias may also experience speech, language and communication difficulties, and little is known about interventions that may address these difficulties. What this paper adds to existing knowledge People living with or caring for somebody with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, Lewy body dementia, posterior cortical atrophy and young onset Alzheimer's disease report experiencing speech, language and communication difficulties that impact on the person with dementia's social participation and mood. Participants in this study also shared their opinions about how speech and language interventions could help, from the earliest stages of the disease. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Speech and language therapists need to address the individual speech, language and communication needs of people with dementias, even those that are not thought to be language-led. Current speech and language therapy service provision does not meet the needs of people with non-language led dementias and further research is required to develop interventions and services to meet these needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Volkmer
- Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Lisa Cross
- Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lily Highton
- Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Whittington Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Connie Jackson
- Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Chloe Smith
- Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Emilie Brotherhood
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Emma V Harding
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Cath Mummery
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jonathan Rohrer
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rimona Weil
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Keir Yong
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sebastian Crutch
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Chris J D Hardy
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hardy CJD, Taylor‐Rubin C, Taylor B, Harding E, Gonzalez AS, Jiang J, Thompson L, Kingma R, Chokesuwattanaskul A, Walker F, Barker S, Brotherhood E, Waddington C, Wood O, Zimmermann N, Kupeli N, Yong KXX, Camic PM, Stott J, Marshall CR, Oxtoby NP, Rohrer JD, O'Shea F, Volkmer A, Crutch SJ, Warren JD. Symptom-based staging for logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia. Eur J Neurol 2024; 31:e16304. [PMID: 38666798 PMCID: PMC11235891 DOI: 10.1111/ene.16304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA) is a major variant presentation of Alzheimer's disease (AD) that signals the importance of communication dysfunction across AD phenotypes. A clinical staging system is lacking for the evolution of AD-associated communication difficulties that could guide diagnosis and care planning. Our aim was to create a symptom-based staging scheme for lvPPA, identifying functional milestones relevant to the broader AD spectrum. METHODS An international lvPPA caregiver cohort was surveyed on symptom development under an 'exploratory' survey (34 UK caregivers). Feedback from this survey informed the development of a 'consolidation' survey (27 UK, 10 Australian caregivers) in which caregivers were presented with six provisional clinical stages and feedback was analysed using a mixed-methods approach. RESULTS Six clinical stages were endorsed. Early symptoms included word-finding difficulty, with loss of message comprehension and speech intelligibility signalling later-stage progression. Additionally, problems with hearing in noise, memory and route-finding were prominent early non-verbal symptoms. 'Milestone' symptoms were identified that anticipate daily-life functional transitions and care needs. CONCLUSIONS This work introduces a new symptom-based staging scheme for lvPPA, and highlights milestone symptoms that could inform future clinical scales for anticipating and managing communication dysfunction across the AD spectrum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris J. D. Hardy
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
| | - Cathleen Taylor‐Rubin
- Uniting War Memorial HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Beatrice Taylor
- UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Emma Harding
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
| | | | - Jessica Jiang
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
| | - Laura Thompson
- Uniting War Memorial HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Rachel Kingma
- Uniting War Memorial HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Anthipa Chokesuwattanaskul
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
- Division of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial HospitalThai Red Cross SocietyBangkokThailand
- Cognitive Clinical and Computational Neuroscience Research Unit, Faculty of MedicineChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
| | | | - Suzie Barker
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
| | - Emilie Brotherhood
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
| | - Claire Waddington
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
| | - Olivia Wood
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
| | - Nikki Zimmermann
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
| | - Nuriye Kupeli
- Division of Psychiatry, Marie Curie Palliative Care Research DepartmentUCLLondonUK
| | - Keir X. X. Yong
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
| | - Paul M. Camic
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
| | - Joshua Stott
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
- ADAPTlab, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health PsychologyUCLLondonUK
| | | | - Neil P. Oxtoby
- UCL Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Jonathan D. Rohrer
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
| | - Frankie O'Shea
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
| | - Anna Volkmer
- Psychology and Language Sciences (PALS)UCLLondonUK
| | - Sebastian J. Crutch
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
| | - Jason D. Warren
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rossi-Harries S, Harrison CR, Camic PM, Sullivan MP, Grillo A, Crutch SJ, Harding E. 'Talking lines': the stories of diagnosis and support as told by those with lived experience of rare forms of dementia. BMC Geriatr 2024; 24:504. [PMID: 38849735 PMCID: PMC11157747 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-04988-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People living with, or caring for someone with, rare forms of dementia can encounter issues while obtaining a diagnosis and trying to access appropriate support. This can affect their wellbeing, quality of life, social relationships and employment status. This study makes use of an arts-based narrative approach to explore individual accounts of these experiences whilst also exploring how, in telling their stories, those affected by rare forms of dementia might invoke, and situate their stories in relation to, broader cultural narratives around dementia and illness. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted via video-conferencing software with participants (N = 27), living with, or caring for someone with, a rare forms of dementia. Participants used line drawings to depict their journey from initial symptoms to the present day, followed by prompts to verbally narrate their experiences. All interview transcripts and line drawings were subjected to narrative analysis. Four sets of transcripts and drawings were then subjected to more in-depth analysis. RESULTS Analysis shed light on the struggles encountered by both care-partners and people with a diagnosis, while navigating a health and social care system that does not always understand their needs. This often led to individuals feeling isolated and unsupported. Accounts also depicted challenges to identity brought on by the process. The moment of diagnosis was also drawn in a complicated light. Individuals found comfort in gaining understanding, but felt fear at recognising upcoming challenges. Participants situated their own accounts against mainstream cultural narratives around what good support for cognitive impairment and dementia might look like, whilst also demonstrating the influential role they took on in pursuing the right care. CONCLUSIONS The use of line drawing, alongside narrative interviews, allowed participants to tell complicated, sometimes anachronistic, stories about difficult experiences, whilst also reflecting on, and attaching meaning to, them. These stories highlighted pressing gaps in healthcare services and shone a light on the various pieces of collective action individuals were engaged in in order to improve them. Finally, in modelling some elements of the participants' service provision which were working, the narratives pointed to future directions services might move in.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Rossi-Harries
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, box 16, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
| | - Charles R Harrison
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, box 16, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Paul M Camic
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, box 16, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Mary Pat Sullivan
- School of Social Work, Faculty of Education and Professional Studies, Nipissing University, Nipissing, ON, Canada
| | - Adetola Grillo
- School of Social Work, Faculty of Education and Professional Studies, Nipissing University, Nipissing, ON, Canada
| | - Sebastian James Crutch
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, box 16, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Emma Harding
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, box 16, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Stevens-Neck R, Walton J, Alterkawi S, Brotherhood EV, Camic PM, Crutch SJ, Gerritzen EV, Harding E, McKee-Jackson R, Rossi-Harries S, Street RE, van der Byl Williams M, Waddington C, Wood O, Moore KJ. A mixed methods evaluation of a program exploring predeath grief and loss for carers of people with rarer dementias. Int Psychogeriatr 2024; 36:502-513. [PMID: 37128845 DOI: 10.1017/s1041610223000236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Predeath grief conceptualizes complex feelings of loss experienced for someone who is still living and is linked to poor emotional well-being. The Road Less Travelled program aimed to help carers of people with rarer dementias identify and process predeath grief. This study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of this program. DESIGN Pre-post interventional mixed methods study. SETTING Online videoconference group program for carers across the UK held in 2021. PARTICIPANTS Nine family carers of someone living with a rare form of dementia. Eight were female and one male (mean age 58) with two facilitators. INTERVENTION The Road Less Travelled is an online, facilitated, group-based program that aims to help carers of people with rarer dementias to explore and accept feelings of grief and loss. It involved six fortnightly 2-hour sessions. MEASUREMENTS We collected measures for a range of well-being outcomes at baseline (T1), post-intervention (T2), and 3 months post-intervention (T3). We conducted interviews with participants and facilitators at T2. RESULTS Participant attendance was 98% across all sessions. Findings from the semistructured interviews supported the acceptability of the program and identified improvements in carer well-being. Trends in the outcome measures suggested an improvement in quality of life and a reduction in depression. CONCLUSION The program was feasible to conduct and acceptable to participants. Qualitative reports and high attendance suggest perceived benefits to carers, including increased acceptance of grief, and support the need for a larger-scale pilot study to determine effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosie Stevens-Neck
- North East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jill Walton
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Shaima Alterkawi
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Emilie V Brotherhood
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Paul M Camic
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sebastian J Crutch
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Esther V Gerritzen
- Institute of Mental Health, Mental Health and Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Emma Harding
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Roberta McKee-Jackson
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Samuel Rossi-Harries
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rebecca E Street
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Millie van der Byl Williams
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Claire Waddington
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Olivia Wood
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kirsten J Moore
- Melbourne Ageing Research Collaboration, National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Roberts JR, Windle G, MacLeod CA, Sullivan MP, Camic PM, Stott J, Brotherhood E, Jackson K, Crutch S. "It's a Postcode Lottery": How Do People Affected by Dementia in Wales Experience Their Diagnosis and Post-Diagnostic Support, and How May These Be Improved? INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 21:709. [PMID: 38928955 PMCID: PMC11203760 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21060709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
National dementia strategies are government policies that guide the provision of appropriate support for people living with dementia. These strategies, developed through extensive stakeholder engagement, should be tailored to the cultural and demographic needs of a country. Using a mixed methods survey design, this study explored the aims of the Dementia Action Plan (2018-2022) for Wales (UK) around assessment, diagnosis, and post-diagnostic support, and assessed whether these are being realized. Further, it sought to gain insight from people living with dementia and their carers around how the experience may be improved for others in the future, as the development of the next iteration of the Action Plan is anticipated. Respondents included 71 people, affected by typical and rarer types of dementia, living in both rural and urban areas. Findings suggest both positive and negative experiences, reflecting a 'postcode lottery' of service provision. Attainable recommendations for improvement were made by respondents, which would ultimately likely be cost-effective and reduce strain on formal services. The findings reported in this paper concur with those reported by people living with dementia in other countries, indicating their relevance for policymakers beyond Wales.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Rhiannon Roberts
- DSDC Wales Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Ardudwy, Normal Site, Bangor LL57 2PZ, UK; (G.W.)
| | - Gill Windle
- DSDC Wales Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Ardudwy, Normal Site, Bangor LL57 2PZ, UK; (G.W.)
| | - Catherine Anne MacLeod
- DSDC Wales Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Ardudwy, Normal Site, Bangor LL57 2PZ, UK; (G.W.)
| | - Mary Pat Sullivan
- Faculty of Education and Professional Studies, School of Social Work, Nipissing University, North Bay, ON P1B 8L7, Canada
| | - Paul M. Camic
- Dementia Research Centre, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London (UCL), London WC1N 3AR, UK
| | - Joshua Stott
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London (UCL), London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Emilie Brotherhood
- Dementia Research Centre, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London (UCL), London WC1N 3AR, UK
| | - Kiara Jackson
- DSDC Wales Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Ardudwy, Normal Site, Bangor LL57 2PZ, UK; (G.W.)
| | - Sebastian Crutch
- Dementia Research Centre, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London (UCL), London WC1N 3AR, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Volkmer A, Copland DA, Henry ML, Warren JD, Varley R, Wallace SJ, Hardy CJ. COS-PPA: protocol to develop a core outcome set for primary progressive aphasia. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e078714. [PMID: 38719304 PMCID: PMC11086495 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The term primary progressive aphasia (PPA) describes a group of language-led dementias. Disease-modifying treatments that delay, slow or reverse progression of PPA are currently lacking, though a number of interventions to manage the symptoms of PPA have been developed in recent years. Unfortunately, studies exploring the effectiveness of these interventions have used a variety of different outcome measures, limiting comparability. There are more constructs, apart from word retrieval, that are important for people with PPA that have not received much attention in the research literature. Existing core outcome sets (COS) for dementia and non-progressive aphasia do not meet the needs of people with PPA, highlighting a need to develop a specific COS for PPA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This protocol describes a three-stage study to identify a COS for PPA interventions in research and clinical practice. The stage 1 systematic review will identify existing speech, language and communication measures used to examine the effectiveness of interventions for PPA in the research literature. Employing a nominal group technique, stage 2 will identify the most important outcomes for people with PPA and their families. The data collected in stages 1 and 2 will be jointly analysed with the project PPI group and will inform the stage 2 modified Delphi consensus study to identify a core outcome measurement set for PPA among a range of research disciplines undertaking intervention studies for people with PPA. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval for stage 2 of the study has been sought individually in each country at collaborating institutions and is stated in detail in the manuscript. Stage 3 has been granted ethical approval by the Chairs of UCL Language and Cognition Department Ethics, Project ID LCD-2023-06. Work undertaken at stages 1, 2 and 3 will be published in open-access peer-reviewed journal articles and presented at international scientific conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022367565.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Volkmer
- Department of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - David A Copland
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Maya L Henry
- Departments of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences and Neurology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Jason D Warren
- Dementia Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rosemary Varley
- Department of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah J Wallace
- Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Health, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Chris Jd Hardy
- Dementia Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Camic PM, Sullivan MP, Harding E, Gould M, Wilson L, Rossi-Harries S, Grillo A, McKee-Jackson R, Cox SM, Stott J, Brotherhood EV, Windle G, Crutch SJ. 'Misdiagnosed and Misunderstood': Insights into Rarer Forms of Dementia through a Stepwise Approach to Co-Constructed Research Poetry. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:485. [PMID: 38391860 PMCID: PMC10887667 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12040485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2023] [Revised: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
This study investigated co-constructed research poetry as a way to understand the lived experiences of people affected by rarer dementia and as a means to use poetry to convey those experiences to healthcare professionals. Using mixed methods, 71 people living with rarer dementia and care-partners (stakeholders) contributed to co-constructing 27 poems with professional poets; stakeholders' verbatim words were analysed with descriptive qualitative analysis. Stakeholders were also surveyed and interviewed about their participation. Healthcare professionals (n = 93) were surveyed to elicit their responses to learning through poetry and its acceptability as a learning tool. Poems conveyed a shared narrative of different aspects of lived experience, often owing to atypical symptoms, misunderstandings by professionals, lack of support pathways, and a continuous struggle to adapt. Stakeholder surveys indicated it was a valuable experience to both co-create and respond to the poems, whilst group interviews revealed people's experiences of the research poetry were characterised by reflection on lived experience, curiosity and exploration. Healthcare professionals' responses reinforced poetry's capacity to stimulate cognitive and affective learning specific to rare dementia support and prompt both empathy and critical thinking in practice. As the largest poetry-based study that we are aware of, this novel accessible approach of creating group poems yielded substantial information about the experiences and needs of those affected by rarer dementia and how poetry can contribute to healthcare education and training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul M Camic
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, UK
| | - Mary Pat Sullivan
- School of Social Work, Faculty of Education and Professional Studies, Nipissing University, North Bay, ON P1B 8L7, Canada
| | - Emma Harding
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, UK
| | - Martha Gould
- Independent Researcher, North Bay, ON P1B 8L7, Canada
| | - Lawrence Wilson
- Independent Researcher, Sonic Studios, Rye, East Sussex TN31 7NY, UK
| | - Sam Rossi-Harries
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, UK
| | - Adetola Grillo
- School of Social Work, Faculty of Education and Professional Studies, Nipissing University, North Bay, ON P1B 8L7, Canada
| | - Roberta McKee-Jackson
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, UK
| | - Susan M Cox
- W. Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Joshua Stott
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Emilie V Brotherhood
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, UK
| | - Gill Windle
- Ageing and Dementia @ Bangor, Dementia Services Development Centre, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2EE, UK
| | - Sebastian J Crutch
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Davies-Abbott I, Anthony BF, Jackson K, Windle G, Edwards RT. The Diagnostic Pathway Experiences of People Living with Rare Dementia and Their Family Caregivers: A Cross-Sectional Mixed Methods Study Using Qualitative and Economic Analyses. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 21:231. [PMID: 38397720 PMCID: PMC10888730 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21020231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
The pathways for receiving a diagnosis of a rare type of dementia are poorly understood. Diagnostic challenges decrease access to relevant health promotion activities and post-diagnostic support. This study was focused on pathways experienced by people affected by rare dementia in Wales, United Kingdom (UK), considering the practical, emotional, and economic consequences. Semi-structured interviews were completed with 10 people affected by rare dementia across Wales, UK (nine family caregivers and one person living with rare dementia). The interview data were subject to a thematic analysis and a bottom-up costing approach was used to cost the pathway journeys. Five transitional points occurred across the diagnostic pathway (initial contact, initial referral, further referrals-provider, further referrals-private, and diagnosis) alongside two further themes (i.e., involved in the diagnostic process and disputes between stakeholders). The timeliness of the diagnosis was perceived to often be subject to 'luck', with access to private healthcare a personal finance option to expedite the process. Higher economic costs were observed when, in retrospect, inappropriate referrals were made, or multiple referrals were required. The confusion and disputes relating to individual diagnostic pathways led to further emotional burdens, suggesting that higher economic costs and emotional consequences are interlinked. Clearer diagnostic pathways for rare dementia may prevent unnecessary service contacts, waiting times, and associated distress. Prioritising appropriate and timely service contacts leads to diagnosis and support to families and enables people to increase control over their health. Appropriate diagnostic pathways may be less costly and reduce costs for families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Davies-Abbott
- The Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK
| | - Bethany F. Anthony
- DSDC Wales Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2PZ, UK
| | - Kiara Jackson
- DSDC Wales Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2PZ, UK
| | - Gill Windle
- DSDC Wales Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2PZ, UK
| | - Rhiannon Tudor Edwards
- DSDC Wales Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2PZ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hayes OS, El Baou C, Hardy CJD, Camic PM, Brotherhood EV, Harding E, Crutch SJ. How Do Care Partners of People with Rare Dementia Use Language in Online Peer Support Groups? A Quantitative Text Analysis Study. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:313. [PMID: 38338197 PMCID: PMC10855301 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12030313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
We used quantitative text analysis to examine conversations in a series of online support groups attended by care partners of people living with rare dementias (PLWRD). We used transcripts of 14 sessions (>100,000 words) to explore patterns of communication in trained facilitators' (n = 2) and participants' (n = 11) speech and to investigate the impact of session agenda on language use. We investigated the features of their communication via Poisson regression and a clustering algorithm. We also compared their speech with a natural speech corpus. We found that differences to natural speech emerged, notably in emotional tone (d = -3.2, p < 0.001) and cognitive processes (d = 2.8, p < 0.001). We observed further differences between facilitators and participants and between sessions based on agenda. The clustering algorithm categorised participants' contributions into three groups: sharing experience, self-reflection, and group processes. We discuss the findings in the context of Social Comparison Theory. We argue that dedicated online spaces have a positive impact on care partners in combatting isolation and stress via affiliation with peers. We then discuss the linguistic mechanisms by which social support was experienced in the group. The present paper has implications for any services seeking insight into how peer support is designed, delivered, and experienced by participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver S. Hayes
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London WC1N 3AR, UK (P.M.C.); (E.V.B.); (S.J.C.)
| | - Celine El Baou
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London WC1N 3AR, UK (P.M.C.); (E.V.B.); (S.J.C.)
- Adapt Lab, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, UCL, London WC1E 7HB, UK
| | - Chris J. D. Hardy
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London WC1N 3AR, UK (P.M.C.); (E.V.B.); (S.J.C.)
| | - Paul M. Camic
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London WC1N 3AR, UK (P.M.C.); (E.V.B.); (S.J.C.)
| | - Emilie V. Brotherhood
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London WC1N 3AR, UK (P.M.C.); (E.V.B.); (S.J.C.)
| | - Emma Harding
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London WC1N 3AR, UK (P.M.C.); (E.V.B.); (S.J.C.)
| | - Sebastian J. Crutch
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London WC1N 3AR, UK (P.M.C.); (E.V.B.); (S.J.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hardy CJD, Taylor‐Rubin C, Taylor B, Harding E, Gonzalez AS, Jiang J, Thompson L, Kingma R, Chokesuwattanaskul A, Walker F, Barker S, Brotherhood E, Waddington C, Wood O, Zimmermann N, Kupeli N, Yong KXX, Camic PM, Stott J, Marshall CR, Oxtoby NP, Rohrer JD, Volkmer A, Crutch SJ, Warren JD. Symptom-led staging for semantic and non-fluent/agrammatic variants of primary progressive aphasia. Alzheimers Dement 2024; 20:195-210. [PMID: 37548125 PMCID: PMC10917001 DOI: 10.1002/alz.13415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Here we set out to create a symptom-led staging system for the canonical semantic and non-fluent/agrammatic variants of primary progressive aphasia (PPA), which present unique diagnostic and management challenges not well captured by functional scales developed for Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. METHODS An international PPA caregiver cohort was surveyed on symptom development under six provisional clinical stages and feedback was analyzed using a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design. RESULTS Both PPA syndromes were characterized by initial communication dysfunction and non-verbal behavioral changes, with increasing syndromic convergence and functional dependency at later stages. Milestone symptoms were distilled to create a prototypical progression and severity scale of functional impairment: the PPA Progression Planning Aid ("PPA-Squared"). DISCUSSION This work introduces a symptom-led staging scheme and functional scale for semantic and non-fluent/agrammatic variants of PPA. Our findings have implications for diagnostic and care pathway guidelines, trial design, and personalized prognosis and treatment for PPA. HIGHLIGHTS We introduce new symptom-led perspectives on primary progressive aphasia (PPA). The focus is on non-fluent/agrammatic (nfvPPA) and semantic (svPPA) variants. Foregrounding of early and non-verbal features of PPA and clinical trajectories is featured. We introduce a symptom-led staging scheme for PPA. We propose a prototype for a functional impairment scale, the PPA Progression Planning Aid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris J. D. Hardy
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
| | - Cathleen Taylor‐Rubin
- Uniting War Memorial HospitalSydneyAustralia
- Faculty of MedicineHealth and Human SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
| | - Beatrice Taylor
- Centre for Medical Image ComputingDepartment of Computer ScienceUCLLondonUK
| | - Emma Harding
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
| | | | - Jessica Jiang
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
| | | | | | - Anthipa Chokesuwattanaskul
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
- Division of NeurologyDepartment of Internal MedicineKing Chulalongkorn Memorial HospitalBangkokThailand
- Cognitive Clinical and Computational Neuroscience Research UnitFaculty of MedicineChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
| | | | - Suzie Barker
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
| | - Emilie Brotherhood
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
| | - Claire Waddington
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
| | - Olivia Wood
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
| | - Nikki Zimmermann
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
| | - Nuriye Kupeli
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research DepartmentDivision of PsychiatryUCLLondonUK
| | - Keir X. X. Yong
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
| | - Paul M. Camic
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
| | - Joshua Stott
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
- ADAPT LabResearch Department of ClinicalEducational and Health PsychologyUCLLondonUK
| | | | - Neil P. Oxtoby
- Centre for Medical Image ComputingDepartment of Computer ScienceUCLLondonUK
| | - Jonathan D. Rohrer
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
| | - Anna Volkmer
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
- Psychology and Language Sciences (PALS)UCLLondonUK
| | | | - Jason D. Warren
- Dementia Research CentreUCL Queen Square Institute of NeurologyUCLLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Naunton Morgan B, Windle G, Lamers C, Brotherhood E, Crutch S. Adaptation of an eHealth Intervention: iSupport for Carers of People with Rare Dementias. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 21:47. [PMID: 38248512 PMCID: PMC10815602 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21010047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
'iSupport' is an online psychoeducation and skills development intervention created by the World Health Organisation to support people with dementia. This project adapted iSupport for carers of people with rare dementias (iSupport RDC), creating a new resource to support the health and wellbeing of this underserved population. The adaptation involved three phases: (1) Co-design methods to generate preliminary adaptations; (2) Analysis of phase one findings informing adaptations to iSupport to develop; iSupport RDC; (3) Post-adaptation survey to ascertain participant agreement with the adaptations in iSupport RDC. Fourteen participants contributed, resulting in 212 suggested adaptations, of which 94 (92%) were considered practical, generalisable, and aligned with iSupport principles. These adaptations encompassed content and design changes, including addressing the challenges of rare dementias (PCA, PPA, LBD, and FTD). iSupport RDC represents a significant adaptation of the WHO iSupport intervention. Its tailored nature acknowledges the unique needs of people caring for someone with a rare dementia, improving their access to specialised resources and support. By extending iSupport to this population, it contributes to advancing dementia care inclusivity and broadening the understanding of rare dementias. A feasibility study is underway to assess iSupport RDCs acceptability, with prospects for cultural adaptations to benefit carers globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethan Naunton Morgan
- School of Psychology and Sports Science, Bangor University, Brigantia Building, Bangor LL57 2AS, UK
| | - Gill Windle
- School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Fron Heluog Building, Bangor LL57 2EE, UK
| | - Carolien Lamers
- North Wales Clinical Psychology Programme, Bangor University, Brigantia Building, Bangor LL57 2AS, UK
| | - Emilie Brotherhood
- Dementia Research Centre, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London (UCL), Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Sebastian Crutch
- Dementia Research Centre, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London (UCL), Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Windle G, Roberts J, MacLeod C, Algar-Skaife K, Sullivan MP, Brotherhood E, Jones CH, Stott J. 'I have never bounced back': resilience and living with dementia. Aging Ment Health 2023; 27:2355-2367. [PMID: 37020427 DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2023.2196248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This work responds to the limited research about resilience when living with dementia and develops a conceptual model to inform service development and healthcare practices for this population. METHODS An iterative process of theory building across four phases of activity (scoping review n = 9 studies), stakeholder engagement (n = 7), interviews (n = 11) generated a combined sample of 87 people living with dementia and their carers, including those affected by rare dementias to explore their lived experiences. An existing framework of resilience developed in other populations served as the starting point to analyse and synthesise the findings, inspiring a new conceptual model of resilience unique to the experience of living with dementia. RESULTS The synthesis suggests resilience encompasses the daily struggles of living with a dementia; people are not flourishing, thriving or 'bouncing back', but are managing and adapting under pressure and stress. The conceptual model suggests resilience may be achieved through the collective and collaborative role of psychological strengths, practical approaches to adapting to life with dementia, continuing with hobbies, interests and activities, strong relationships with family and friends, peer support and education, participating in community activities and support from healthcare professionals. Most of these themes are not reflected in resilience outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS Practitioners adopting a strengths-based approach utilising the conceptual model at the point of diagnosis and post-diagnosis support may help individuals achieve resilience through appropriately tailored services and support. This 'resilience practice' could also extend to other degenerative or debilitating chronic conditions a person faces in their life course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gill Windle
- Ageing and Dementia Bangor, Dementia Services Development Centre (DSDC), School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Jennifer Roberts
- Ageing and Dementia Bangor, Dementia Services Development Centre (DSDC), School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Catherine MacLeod
- Ageing and Dementia Bangor, Dementia Services Development Centre (DSDC), School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Katherine Algar-Skaife
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science (INB), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Mary Pat Sullivan
- Faculty of Education and Professional Studies, School of Social Work, Nipissing University, North Bay, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emilie Brotherhood
- Dementia Research Centre, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Catrin Hedd Jones
- Ageing and Dementia Bangor, Dementia Services Development Centre (DSDC), School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Joshua Stott
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Volkmer A, Cartwright J, Ruggero L, Loizidou M, Hardy CJD, Hersh D. Muddles and puzzles: Metaphor use associated with disease progression in Primary Progressive Aphasia. APHASIOLOGY 2023; 38:1100-1117. [PMID: 38708057 PMCID: PMC11068082 DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2023.2257356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
Background Primary Progressive Aphasia describes a language-led dementia and its variants. There is little research exploring the experiences of living with this disease. Metaphor, words that represent something else, have been studied extensively in health-related narratives to gain a more intimate insight into health experiences. Aims This study explored the metaphors used spontaneously by people with PPA, their care partners (family), and speech and language therapists/pathologists (SLT/Ps) providing support along the continuum of care. Methods & Procedures This study examined two previously collected data sets comprising naturalistic talk where metaphors were not the specific focus, the first from focus groups conducted with people with PPA and their families and the second from focus groups conducted with SLT/Ps working with people with PPA. Transcribed data were analysed for metaphor use through an iterative narrative approach. Outcomes & Results In all, 237 examples of metaphorical language were identified in the data, with 14 metaphors from people with PPA, 116 from the families and 106 from SLT/Ps. Different metaphors were used by participants to describe their experiences depending on which variant of PPA they were living with, and people also described their disease differently over time. SLT/Ps also used metaphors, however, their language reflected the structured, professional perspective of delivering speech and language therapy services. Conclusions & Implications SLT/Ps should listen for and recognise the metaphorical language used by people with PPA and their families to ensure therapeutic alignment, see beyond the PPA to recognise the individual's needs, and provide person-centred and empathic support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Volkmer
- Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, UK
| | - Jade Cartwright
- School of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia
| | - Leanne Ruggero
- School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Maria Loizidou
- Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, UK
- School of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia
- School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
- Curtin School of Allied Health, and Curtin enAble Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Chris JD Hardy
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Deborah Hersh
- Curtin School of Allied Health, and Curtin enAble Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Suárez-González A, John A, Brotherhood E, Camic PM, McKee-Jackson R, Melville M, Sullivan MP, Tudor-Edwards R, Windle G, Crutch S, Hoare Z, Stott J. "Better Living with Non-memory-led Dementia": protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial of a web-based caregiver educational programme. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2023; 9:172. [PMID: 37821924 PMCID: PMC10566043 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01403-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-memory-led dementias such as posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) are low prevalent and often affect individuals under the age of 65. Tailored educational and support resources for caregivers of people living with these dementia phenotypes are scarce and unevenly distributed geographically. Web-based educational programmes are emerging as promising alternatives to improve caregiver self-efficacy and well-being. Here, we present the protocol of a study aiming to assess the feasibility of a co-produced online educational programme for caregivers of people living PCA, PPA and bvFTD: the Better Living with Non-memory-led Dementia programme. METHODS A randomised controlled feasibility trial will be conducted on a sample of 30 caregivers of people living with PCA, PPA and bvFTD. Participants will be recruited among members of the support organisation Rare Dementia Support (based at UCL in the UK). The intervention group will be given access to an 8-week co-produced web-based educational programme consisting of 6 modules addressing education about PCA, PPA and bvFTD and support strategies for the person with dementia and for the caregiver. The control group will receive treatment as usual (TAU). Feasibility will be measured through feasibility of recruitment, clinical measurement tools and acceptability. Clinical measures will be used to assess preliminary efficacy and data on completion rates, missing data and variability used to decide on measures to be included in a full-scale trial. Allocation ratio will be 2:1 (intervention:control) stratified by diagnosis. Feasibility of recruitment and acceptability will be assessed. Clinical measures will be administered at baseline and 8-week and 3-month post-randomisation. The control group will be offered access to the intervention at the completion of data collection. Participants will be unblinded, and all measures will be self-reported online. DISCUSSION Online-delivered educational programmes show potential for improving care competency of caregivers and may contribute to overcoming geographical inequalities in local provision of support services. This pilot study will inform a fully powered international trial to determine the effectiveness of Better Living with Non-memory-led Dementia. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial has been registered prospectively on the Clinical Trials Registry on 1st September 2022, registration number NCT05525377.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aida Suárez-González
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
| | - Amber John
- Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Emilie Brotherhood
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Paul M Camic
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Roberta McKee-Jackson
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Mel Melville
- Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mary Pat Sullivan
- Faculty of Education and Professional Studies, School of Social Work, Nipissing University, North Bay, ON, Canada
| | | | - Gill Windle
- Dementia Services Development Centre, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Sebastian Crutch
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Zoe Hoare
- School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Joshua Stott
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Harding E, Rossi-Harries S, Alterkawi S, Waddington C, Grillo A, Wood O, Brotherhood EV, Windle G, Sullivan MP, Camic PM, Stott J, Crutch SJ. 'The oxygen of shared experience': exploring social support processes within peer support groups for carers of people with non-memory-led and inherited dementias. Aging Ment Health 2023; 27:1912-1928. [PMID: 36999880 DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2023.2194848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore support processes and behaviours taking place during online peer support groups for family carers of people living with rare, non-memory-led and inherited dementias (PLWRD). METHODS Twenty-five family carers of PLWRD participated in a series of ongoing online peer support groups on the theme of 'Independence and Identity'. Transcripts from 16 sessions were analysed using qualitative directed content analysis with a coding framework informed by Cutrona & Suhr's (2004) Social Support Behaviour Code (SSBC). RESULTS Most of the social support behaviours outlined in the SSBC were identified within the sessions, along with two novel social support categories - 'Experiential Support' and 'Community Support' - and novel support behaviours including 'Advocacy and Collective Action' and 'Uses Humour'. The SSBC code 'Relationship' appeared to be of central importance. CONCLUSIONS This study sheds light on the unique challenges of the caring context for those affected by non-memory-led and inherited dementias and the significant contributions carers can offer to, and receive from, peers in similar situations. It highlights the importance of services which recognise the value of the informational and emotional expertise of carers of PLWRD and encourages the continued development and delivery of tailored support for these populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Harding
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Samuel Rossi-Harries
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Shaima Alterkawi
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Claire Waddington
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Adetola Grillo
- School of Social Work, Faculty of Education and Professional Studies, Nipissing University, Nipissing, Ontario, Canada
| | - Olivia Wood
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Emilie V Brotherhood
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Gill Windle
- Dementia Services Development Centre, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Mary Pat Sullivan
- School of Social Work, Faculty of Education and Professional Studies, Nipissing University, Nipissing, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul M Camic
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Joshua Stott
- Department of Clinical, Educational, and Health Psychology, UCL Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, UCL, London, UK
| | - Sebastian J Crutch
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rapley JM, Camic PM, Brotherhood E, Crutch SJ, Harding E. Video Conferencing Peer Support and Rarer Forms of Dementia: An Exploration of Family Carers' Positive Experiences. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2023; 33:884-896. [PMID: 37395095 PMCID: PMC10426248 DOI: 10.1177/10497323231172880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
Little is known regarding the nuanced experiences of family carers for people living with rare dementias (PLWRD), with no known literature exploring their positive experiences of caring discussed within peer support group settings. This article explores family carers of PLWRD's positive experiences reported in video conferencing peer support groups. Six peer support group sessions involving a total of nine participants were qualitatively analysed using thematic analysis, guided by the conceptual framework of positive aspects of caring (CFPAC) (Carbonneau et al., 2010). Six themes were identified: (1) Protecting, maintaining, enjoying and finding strength in their relationship with the PLWRD; (2) Using tools and resources in response to challenges; (3) Positive impact of interactions and others' responses to the dementia; (4) Overcoming barriers to taking a break while maintaining their wellbeing, (5) Maintaining positive outlooks and showing psychological resilience in adversity; and (6) Attributing meaning to the caring role. This article highlights family carers of PLWRD's positive psychological, physical and social resources, balanced against the challenges of caring and maintaining their wellbeing, and identifies ways of promoting family carers' positive caring experiences and resources within healthcare and supportive settings.
Collapse
|
20
|
Harding E, Rossi-Harries S, Gerritzen EV, Zimmerman N, Hoare Z, Proctor D, Brotherhood E, Crutch S, Suárez-González A. "I felt like I had been put on the shelf and forgotten about" - lasting lessons about the impact of COVID-19 on people affected by rarer dementias. BMC Geriatr 2023; 23:392. [PMID: 37370011 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-03992-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The public health measures imposed in many countries to contain the spread of COVID-19 resulted in significant suspensions in the provision of support and care for people with dementia. The negative effects of these measures have been extensively reported. However, little is known about the specific impact on people with young onset, non-memory-led and inherited dementias. This group may have experienced different challenges compared to those with late onset dementia given their non-memory phenotypes and younger age. We explored the impact of the first COVID-19 lockdown on people living with familial Alzheimer's disease, behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, familial frontotemporal dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies, posterior cortical atrophy and primary progressive aphasia and their carers in the UK and their self-reported strategies for coping. METHODS This was a mixed methods study. An online survey was administered to people with dementia and family carers recruited via Rare Dementia Support. Free-text responses were analysed using framework analysis to identify key issues and themes. RESULTS 184 carers and 24 people with dementia completed the survey. Overall, people with dementia experienced worsening of cognitive symptoms (70%), ability to do things (62%), well-being (57%) and changes to medication (26%) during lockdown. Carers reported a reduction in the support they received (55%) which impacted their own mental health negatively. Qualitative analysis of free-text responses shed light on how the disruption to routines, changes to roles and responsibilities, and widespread disconnection from friends, family and health and social care support varied according to phenotype. These impacts were exacerbated by a more general sense that precious time was being lost, given the progressive nature of dementia. Despite significant challenges, respondents demonstrated resilience and resourcefulness in reporting unexpected positives and strategies for adapting to confinement. CONCLUSIONS This study has highlighted the specific impacts of the COVID-19 restrictions on people with young onset, non-memory-led and inherited dementias, including behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, primary progressive aphasia and posterior cortical atrophy, and their carers. The specific challenges faced according to diagnosis and the self-reported strategies speak to the importance of - and may inform the development of - tailored support for these underrepresented groups more generally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Harding
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Sam Rossi-Harries
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Esther Vera Gerritzen
- Institute of Mental Health, Mental Health and Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Nikki Zimmerman
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Zoe Hoare
- NWORTH Clinical Trials Unit, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Danielle Proctor
- Department of Clinical, Educational, and Health Psychology, UCL Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, UCL, London, UK
| | - Emilie Brotherhood
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Sebastian Crutch
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Aida Suárez-González
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, 8-11 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Loizidou M, Brotherhood E, Harding E, Crutch S, Warren JD, Hardy CJ, Volkmer A. 'Like going into a chocolate shop, blindfolded': What do people with primary progressive aphasia want from speech and language therapy? INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2023; 58:737-755. [PMID: 36448629 PMCID: PMC10947572 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) describes a group of language-led dementias. PPAs are complex, diverse and difficult to diagnose, and therefore conventional models of aphasia and dementia treatment do not meet their needs. The research evidence on intervention for PPA is developing, but to date there are only a few case studies exploring the experiences of people with PPA (PwPPA) themselves. AIMS To explore the experiences and opinions of PwPPA and their communication partners (CPs) to understand how speech and language therapy (SLT) services can better meet their needs. METHODS & PROCEDURES A qualitative research approach was used whereby PwPPA and their friends or family members were recruited to participate in focus groups, via advertisements in the Rare Dementia Support PPA group newsletters. Consenting participants were allocated to attend one of four focus groups hosted on an online video conferencing platform. Participants were asked about their communication difficulties, and how SLT could address these needs. All meetings were transcribed, and data were examined using reflexive thematic analysis. OUTCOMES & RESULTS Six PwPPA and 14 CPs representing all three PPA variants and mixed PPA participated in the focus groups. Four main themes were identified during the analysis of the focus group discussions: (1) CPs' burden, (2) adjusting to the diagnosis, (3) communication abilities and difficulties and (4) beyond language. A further 10 subthemes were identified. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS This study provides a greater understanding of the experiences and needs of PwPPA and their families in relation to SLT. This work underlines the importance of a person-centred approach that considers the broader needs of both the PwPPA and the people around them. This will enable service providers to deliver SLT that meets the needs of PwPPA and their families and will also inform future research in this field. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS What is already known on this subject We know that PwPPA can maintain or even make improvements in word retrieval and speech fluency with SLT exercises. There is also developing evidence of the benefits of interventions such as CP training, communication aid support and other functional interventions. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study provides an understanding of the experiences and opinions of people living with PPA and their families in relation to SLT. Results demonstrate that PwPPA and their families have to navigate a complex journey, identifying strategies to support communication but also the influence of personality and other cognitive symptoms. SLT was useful, but not always available. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? This study will enable service providers to better plan, justify funding for and delivery of SLT that will meet the needs of PwPPA and their families. Most importantly this work underlines the importance of a person-centred approach, incorporating the broader needs of the person with PPA and those around them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Loizidou
- Department of Neurodegenerative DiseaseDementia Research CentreUCL Institute ofNeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Emilie Brotherhood
- Department of Neurodegenerative DiseaseDementia Research CentreUCL Institute ofNeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Emma Harding
- Department of Neurodegenerative DiseaseDementia Research CentreUCL Institute ofNeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Sebastian Crutch
- Department of Neurodegenerative DiseaseDementia Research CentreUCL Institute ofNeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Jason D. Warren
- Department of Neurodegenerative DiseaseDementia Research CentreUCL Institute ofNeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Chris J.D. Hardy
- Department of Neurodegenerative DiseaseDementia Research CentreUCL Institute ofNeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Anna Volkmer
- Division of Psychology and Language SciencesUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hardy CJD, Taylor-Rubin C, Taylor B, Harding E, Gonzalez AS, Jiang J, Thompson L, Kingma R, Chokesuwattanaskul A, Walker F, Barker S, Brotherhood E, Waddington C, Wood O, Zimmermann N, Kupeli N, Yong KXX, Camic PM, Stott J, Marshall CR, Oxtoby NP, Rohrer JD, Volkmer A, Crutch SJ, Warren JD. Symptom-led staging for primary progressive aphasia. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.03.13.23286972. [PMID: 36993460 PMCID: PMC10055437 DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.13.23286972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
The primary progressive aphasias (PPA) present complex and diverse challenges of diagnosis, management and prognosis. A clinically-informed, syndromic staging system for PPA would take a substantial step toward meeting these challenges. This study addressed this need using detailed, multi-domain mixed-methods symptom surveys of people with lived experience in a large international PPA cohort. We administered structured online surveys to caregivers of patients with a canonical PPA syndromic variant (nonfluent/agrammatic (nvPPA), semantic (svPPA) or logopenic (lvPPA)). In an 'exploratory' survey, a putative list and ordering of verbal communication and nonverbal functioning (nonverbal thinking, conduct and wellbeing, physical) symptoms was administered to 118 caregiver members of the UK national PPA Support Group. Based on feedback, we expanded the symptom list and created six provisional clinical stages for each PPA subtype. In a 'consolidation' survey, these stages were presented to 110 caregiver members of UK and Australian PPA Support Groups, and refined based on quantitative and qualitative feedback. Symptoms were retained if rated as 'present' by a majority (at least 50%) of respondents representing that PPA syndrome, and assigned to a consolidated stage based on majority consensus; the confidence of assignment was estimated for each symptom as the proportion of respondents in agreement with the final staging for that symptom. Qualitative responses were analysed using framework analysis. For each PPA syndrome, six stages ranging from 1 ('Very mild') to 6 ('Profound') were identified; earliest stages were distinguished by syndromic hallmark symptoms of communication dysfunction, with increasing trans-syndromic convergence and dependency for basic activities of daily living at later stages. Spelling errors, hearing changes and nonverbal behavioural features were reported at early stages in all syndromes. As the illness evolved, swallowing and mobility problems were reported earlier in nfvPPA than other syndromes, while difficulty recognising familiar people and household items characterised svPPA and visuospatial symptoms were more prominent in lvPPA. Overall confidence of symptom staging was higher for svPPA than other syndromes. Across syndromes, functional milestones were identified as key deficits that predict the sequence of major daily life impacts and associated management needs. Qualitatively, we identified five major themes encompassing 15 subthemes capturing respondents' experiences of PPA and suggestions for staging implementation. This work introduces a prototypical, symptom-led staging scheme for canonical PPA syndromes: the PPA Progression Planning Aid (PPA 2 ). Our findings have implications for diagnostic and care pathway guidelines, trial design and personalised prognosis and treatment for people living with these diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris JD Hardy
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Cathleen Taylor-Rubin
- Uniting War Memorial Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Beatrice Taylor
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, UCL, London, UK
| | - Emma Harding
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Aida Suarez Gonzalez
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Jessica Jiang
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
| | | | | | - Anthipa Chokesuwattanaskul
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
- Division of Neurology, Department of Internal Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
- Cognitive Clinical and Computational Neuroscience Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Suzie Barker
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Emilie Brotherhood
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Claire Waddington
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Olivia Wood
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Nikki Zimmermann
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Nuriye Kupeli
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, UCL, London, UK
| | - Keir XX Yong
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Paul M Camic
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Josh Stott
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
- ADAPTlab, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, UCL, London, UK
| | | | - Neil P. Oxtoby
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, UCL, London, UK
| | - Jonathan D Rohrer
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Anna Volkmer
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
- Psychology and Language Sciences (PALS), UCL, London, UK
| | - Sebastian J Crutch
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
| | - Jason D Warren
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Yong KXX, Graff-Radford J, Ahmed S, Chapleau M, Ossenkoppele R, Putcha D, Rabinovici GD, Suarez-Gonzalez A, Schott JM, Crutch S, Harding E. Diagnosis and Management of Posterior Cortical Atrophy. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2023; 25:23-43. [PMID: 36820004 PMCID: PMC9935654 DOI: 10.1007/s11940-022-00745-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
Purpose of review The study aims to provide a summary of recent developments for diagnosing and managing posterior cortical atrophy (PCA). We present current efforts to improve PCA characterisation and recommendations regarding use of clinical, neuropsychological and biomarker methods in PCA diagnosis and management and highlight current knowledge gaps. Recent findings Recent multi-centre consensus recommendations provide PCA criteria with implications for different management strategies (e.g. targeting clinical features and/or disease). Studies emphasise the preponderance of primary or co-existing Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology underpinning PCA. Evidence of approaches to manage PCA symptoms is largely derived from small studies. Summary PCA diagnosis is frequently delayed, and people are likely to receive misdiagnoses of ocular or psychological conditions. Current treatment of PCA is symptomatic - pharmacological and non-pharmacological - and the use of most treatment options is based on small studies or expert opinion. Recommendations for non-pharmacological approaches include interdisciplinary management tailored to the PCA clinical profile - visual-spatial - rather than memory-led, predominantly young onset - and psychosocial implications. Whilst emerging disease-modifying treatments have not been tested in PCA, an accurate and timely diagnosis of PCA and determining underlying pathology is of increasing importance in the advent of disease-modifying therapies for AD and other albeit rare causes of PCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keir X. X. Yong
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Box 16, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG UK
| | | | - Samrah Ahmed
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire UK
| | - Marianne Chapleau
- Memory and Aging Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Deepti Putcha
- Frontotemporal Disorders Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Gil D. Rabinovici
- Department of Neurology, Radiology, and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Aida Suarez-Gonzalez
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Box 16, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG UK
| | - Jonathan M. Schott
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Box 16, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG UK
| | - Sebastian Crutch
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Box 16, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG UK
| | - Emma Harding
- Dementia Research Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Box 16, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sullivan MP, Williams V, Grillo A, McKee-Jackson R, Camic PM, Windle G, Stott J, Brotherhood E, Crutch SJ. Peer support for people living with rare or young onset dementia: An integrative review. DEMENTIA 2022; 21:2700-2726. [PMID: 36114712 PMCID: PMC9583292 DOI: 10.1177/14713012221126368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Objectives The aim of this integrative review was to identify and synthesize the
literature on peer support interventions for people living with or caring
for someone with a rare or young onset dementia. Design A literature search of articles was performed using the Nipissing University
Primo search system, a central index that enables simultaneous searches
across databases which included MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, PsycINFO,
CINAHL, Sociological Abstracts, Cochrane Library. Results The eleven papers that met the inclusion criteria spanned eighteen years and
from five countries. Studies reported on peer support programs that were
either hospital-based (n = 6) or community-based (n = 4), and were
predominantly led by disciplines in the health sciences. Only one study did
not involve delivering services. There was a range of methodological quality
within the studies included in the review. Further analysis and synthesis
led to the identification of three overarching peer support themes. These
included: (1) peers as necessarily part of social support interventions; (2)
a theoretical portmanteau; and (3) dementia spaces and relationality. Conclusion Consistent with a much larger body of work examining peer involvement in
social interventions, this review reinforced the valuable contribution of
peers. A full understanding of the mechanisms of change was not achieved.
Notwithstanding, the issue of studies neglecting to sufficiently
conceptualize and describe interventions is an important one – drawing
attention to the need to continue to explore varied delivery, including
co-produced models, and more effective evaluation strategies to inform the
dementia care sector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Pat Sullivan
- Faculty of Education and Professional Studies, Nipissing University, North Bay, ON, Canada
| | - Veronika Williams
- Faculty of Education and Professional Studies, Nipissing University, North Bay, ON, Canada
| | - Adetola Grillo
- Faculty of Education and Professional Studies, Nipissing University, North Bay, ON, Canada
| | - Roberta McKee-Jackson
- UCL Institute of Neurology, Dementia Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | - Paul M Camic
- UCL Institute of Neurology, Dementia Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | - Gill Windle
- Ageing and Dementia @ Bangor, Dementia Services Development Centre (DSDC), School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Joshua Stott
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Emily Brotherhood
- UCL Institute of Neurology, Dementia Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sebastian J Crutch
- UCL Institute of Neurology, Dementia Research Centre, University College London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Waddington C, Harding E, Brotherhood EV, Davies Abbott I, Barker S, Camic PM, Ezeofor V, Gardner H, Grillo A, Hardy C, Hoare Z, McKee-Jackson R, Moore K, O'Hara T, Roberts J, Rossi-Harries S, Suarez-Gonzalez A, Sullivan MP, Edwards RT, Van Der Byl Williams M, Walton J, Willoughby A, Windle G, Winrow E, Wood O, Zimmermann N, Crutch SJ, Stott J. The Development of Videoconference-Based Support for People Living With Rare Dementias and Their Carers: Protocol for a 3-Phase Support Group Evaluation. JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e35376. [PMID: 35857375 PMCID: PMC9350818 DOI: 10.2196/35376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background People living with rarer dementias face considerable difficulty accessing tailored information, advice, and peer and professional support. Web-based meeting platforms offer a critical opportunity to connect with others through shared lived experiences, even if they are geographically dispersed, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Objective We aim to develop facilitated videoconferencing support groups (VSGs) tailored to people living with or caring for someone with familial or sporadic frontotemporal dementia or young-onset Alzheimer disease, primary progressive aphasia, posterior cortical atrophy, or Lewy body dementia. This paper describes the development, coproduction, field testing, and evaluation plan for these groups. Methods We describe a 3-phase approach to development. First, information and knowledge were gathered as part of a coproduction process with members of the Rare Dementia Support service. This information, together with literature searches and consultation with experts by experience, clinicians, and academics, shaped the design of the VSGs and session themes. Second, field testing involved 154 Rare Dementia Support members (people living with dementia and carers) participating in 2 rounds of facilitated sessions across 7 themes (health and social care professionals, advance care planning, independence and identity, grief and loss, empowering your identity, couples, and hope and dementia). Third, a detailed evaluation plan for future rounds of VSGs was developed. Results The development of the small groups program yielded content and structure for 9 themed VSGs (the 7 piloted themes plus a later stages program and creativity club for implementation in rounds 3 and beyond) to be delivered over 4 to 8 sessions. The evaluation plan incorporated a range of quantitative (attendance, demographics, and geography; pre-post well-being ratings and surveys; psycholinguistic analysis of conversation; facial emotion recognition; facilitator ratings; and economic analysis of program delivery) and qualitative (content and thematic analysis) approaches. Pilot data from round 2 groups on the pre-post 3-word surveys indicated an increase in the emotional valence of words selected after the sessions. Conclusions The involvement of people with lived experience of a rare dementia was critical to the design, development, and delivery of the small virtual support group program, and evaluation of this program will yield convergent data about the impact of tailored support delivered to geographically dispersed communities. This is the first study to design and plan an evaluation of VSGs specifically for people affected by rare dementias, including both people living with a rare dementia and their carers, and the outcome of the evaluation will be hugely beneficial in shaping specific and targeted support, which is often lacking in this population. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/35376
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Waddington
- Dementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Harding
- Dementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emilie V Brotherhood
- Dementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ian Davies Abbott
- Dementia Services Development Centre, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom
| | - Suzanne Barker
- Dementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul M Camic
- Dementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Victory Ezeofor
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom
| | - Hannah Gardner
- Dementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Adetola Grillo
- School of Social Work, Faculty of Education and Professional Studies, Nipissing University, North Bay, ON, Canada
| | - Chris Hardy
- Dementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Zoe Hoare
- School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom
| | - Roberta McKee-Jackson
- Dementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kirsten Moore
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Trish O'Hara
- Dementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer Roberts
- Dementia Services Development Centre, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom
| | - Samuel Rossi-Harries
- Dementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Aida Suarez-Gonzalez
- Dementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mary Pat Sullivan
- School of Social Work, Faculty of Education and Professional Studies, Nipissing University, North Bay, ON, Canada
| | - Rhiannon Tudor Edwards
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom
| | | | - Jill Walton
- Dementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alicia Willoughby
- Dementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gill Windle
- Dementia Services Development Centre, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom
| | - Eira Winrow
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom
| | - Olivia Wood
- Dementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nikki Zimmermann
- Dementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sebastian J Crutch
- Dementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joshua Stott
- Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Liu KY, Howard R, Banerjee S, Comas‐Herrera A, Goddard J, Knapp M, Livingston G, Manthorpe J, O'Brien JT, Paterson RW, Robinson L, Rossor M, Rowe JB, Sharp DJ, Sommerlad A, Suárez‐González A, Burns A. Dementia wellbeing and COVID-19: Review and expert consensus on current research and knowledge gaps. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2021; 36:1597-1639. [PMID: 34043836 PMCID: PMC8237017 DOI: 10.1002/gps.5567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In response to a commissioned research update on dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic, a UK-based working group, comprising dementia researchers from a range of fields and disciplines, aimed to describe the impact of the pandemic on dementia wellbeing and identify priorities for future research. METHODS We supplemented a rapid literature search (including unpublished, non-peer reviewed and ongoing studies/reports) on dementia wellbeing in the context of COVID-19 with expert group members' consensus about future research needs. From this we generated potential research questions the group judged to be relevant that were not covered by the existing literature. RESULTS Themes emerged from 141 studies within the six domains of the NHS England COVID-19 Dementia Wellbeing Pathway: Preventing Well, Diagnosing Well, Treating Well, Supporting Well, Living Well and Dying Well. We describe current research findings and knowledge gaps relating to the impact on people affected by dementia (individuals with a diagnosis, their carers and social contacts, health and social care practitioners and volunteers), services, research activities and organisations. Broad themes included the potential benefits and risks of new models of working including remote healthcare, the need for population-representative longitudinal studies to monitor longer-term impacts, and the importance of reporting dementia-related findings within broader health and care studies. CONCLUSIONS The COVID-19 pandemic has had a disproportionately negative impact on people affected by dementia. Researchers and funding organisations have responded rapidly to try to understand the impacts. Future research should highlight and resolve outstanding questions to develop evidence-based measures to improve the quality of life of people affected by dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathy Y. Liu
- Division of PsychiatryUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Robert Howard
- Division of PsychiatryUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Adelina Comas‐Herrera
- Department of Health PolicyLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceCare Policy and Evaluation CentreLondonUK
| | - Joanne Goddard
- Economic and Social Research CouncilUK Research and InnovationSwindonUK
| | - Martin Knapp
- Department of Health PolicyLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceCare Policy and Evaluation CentreLondonUK
| | | | - Jill Manthorpe
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Health and Social Care WorkforceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - John T. O'Brien
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Cambridge School of Clinical MedicineCambridgeUK
| | - Ross W. Paterson
- Dementia Research CentreQueen Square UCL Institute of NeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Louise Robinson
- Population Health Sciences InstituteFaculty of Medical SciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastleUK
| | - Martin Rossor
- Dementia Research CentreQueen Square UCL Institute of NeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - James B. Rowe
- Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences UnitUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
- Department of Clinical NeurosciencesUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - David J. Sharp
- Department of Brain SciencesImperial College LondonLondonUK
- UK Dementia Research InstituteCare Research and Technology Centre, Imperial College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Aida Suárez‐González
- Dementia Research CentreQueen Square UCL Institute of NeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Alistair Burns
- Division of Neuroscience and Experimental PsychologyThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Burns A. Editorial: A celebration of dementia care implementation research. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2020; 35:809-810. [PMID: 32017262 DOI: 10.1002/gps.5275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|