1
|
Tong CYM, Koh RYV, Lee ES. A scoping review on the factors associated with the lost to follow-up (LTFU) amongst patients with chronic disease in ambulatory care of high-income countries (HIC). BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:883. [PMID: 37608296 PMCID: PMC10464417 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09863-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the importance of long term follow-up care for patients with chronic disease, many patients fail to adhere to their follow-ups, which increase their risk of further health complications. Therefore, the purpose of this scoping review was to find out the factors associated with lost to follow-up (LTFU) amongst patients with chronic disease in the ambulatory care setting of high-income countries (HICs) to gain insights for better quality of care. Understanding the definition of LTFU is imperative in informing patients, health professionals and researchers for clinical and research purposes. This review also provided an overview of the terms and definitions used to describe LTFU. METHODS The following databases: CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched for studies investigating the factors associated to LTFU from the date of inception until 07 January 2022. RESULTS Five thousand one hundred and seven records were obtained across the databases and 3,416 articles were screened after removing the duplicates. 25 articles met the inclusion criteria, of which 17 were cohort studies, five were cross-sectional studies and three were case-control studies. A total of 32 factors were found to be associated with LTFU and they were categorised into patient factors, clinical factors and healthcare provider factors. CONCLUSION Overall, the factors associated with LTFU were generally inconsistent across studies. However, some factors such as financial factors (i.e., no insurance coverage) and low accessibility of care were consistently associated with LTFU for both mental and physical chronic conditions. The operational definitions of LTFU also varied greatly across studies. Given the mixed findings, future research using qualitative aproaches would be pivotal in understanding LTFU for specific chronic diseases and the development of targeted interventions. Additionally, there is a need to standardise the operational definition of LTFU for research as well as clinical practice purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Eng Sing Lee
- National Healthcare Group Polyclinics, Singapore, Singapore
- MOH Office for Healthcare Transformation, Singapore, Singapore
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Harrison KL, Garrett SB, Halim M, Sideman AB, Allison TA, Dohan D, Naasan G, Miller BL, Smith AK, Ritchie CS. “I Didn’t Sign Up for This”: Perspectives from Persons Living with Dementia and Care Partners on Challenges, Supports, and Opportunities to Add Geriatric Neuropalliative Care to Dementia Specialty Care. J Alzheimers Dis 2022; 90:1301-1320. [DOI: 10.3233/jad-220536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background: In the United States, dementia specialty centers affiliated with centers of excellence for research hold promise as locations to develop innovative, holistic care in care systems otherwise siloed by discipline or payer. Objective: We conducted foundational research to inform development of patient-and family-centered palliative care interventions for dementia specialty centers. Methods: We interviewed persons living with dementia (PLWD), current, and former care partners (CP) recruited from a specialty dementia clinic and purposively selected for variation across disease syndrome and stage. A framework method of thematic analysis included coding, analytic matrices, and pattern mapping. Results: 40 participants included 9 PLWD, 16 current CPs, and 15 former CPs of decedents; 48% impacted by Alzheimer’s disease dementia. While help from family, support groups and adult day centers, paid caregiving, and sensitive clinical care were invaluable to PLWD, CPs, or both, these supports were insufficient to navigate the extensive challenges. Disease-oriented sources of distress included symptoms, functional impairment and falls, uncertainty and loss, and inaccessible care. Social and relational challenges included constrained personal and professional opportunities. The obligation and toll of giving or receiving caregiving were challenging. Clinical care challenges for PLWD and/or CPs included care fragmentation, insufficient guidance to inform planning and need for expert interdisciplinary clinical care at home. Conclusion: Findings highlight the breadth and gravity of gaps, which surpass the disciplinary focus of either behavioral neurology or palliative care alone. Results can inform the development of novel interventions to add principles of geriatrics and neuropalliative care to dementia care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krista L. Harrison
- Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Global Brain Health Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sarah B. Garrett
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Madina Halim
- Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alissa Bernstein Sideman
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Global Brain Health Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Theresa A. Allison
- Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Dohan
- Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Georges Naasan
- The Barbara and Maurice Deane Center for Wellness and Cognitive Health, Department of Neurology, Mount Sinai Hospitals, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bruce L. Miller
- Global Brain Health Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alexander K. Smith
- Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Christine S. Ritchie
- Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- The Mongan Institute and the Division of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|