Stereotactic body radiotherapy as primary treatment for elderly and medically inoperable patients with head and neck cancer

Primary site surgical resection in cM1 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

Objective

To investigate primary site surgical resection and overall survival (OS) in clinically distantly metastatic (cM1) oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC).

Methods

The 2006-2018 National Cancer Database was queried for patients presenting with cM1 OCSCC who underwent chemotherapy. Binary logistic, Kaplan-Meier, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were implemented.

Results

Of 278 patients satisfying inclusion criteria, 139 (50.0%) underwent chemotherapy alone, 80 (28.8%) underwent chemoradiotherapy, 25 (9.0%) underwent surgical resection + adjuvant chemotherapy, and 34 (12.2%) underwent surgical resection + adjuvant chemoradiotherapy; 5-year OS was 9.4%, 15.2%, 8.3%, and 23.8%, respectively (p < .001). Compared with those not undergoing surgical resection, patients undergoing surgical resection underwent radiotherapy more frequently (57.6% vs. 36.5%) but multiple-agent chemotherapy less frequently (40.7% vs. 74.4%) (p < .005). Twenty-one (36.2%) patients undergoing surgical resection had positive surgical margins. Academic facility (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.19, 95% CI 1.54-6.62) and Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score ≥1 (aOR 2.82, 95% CI 1.25-6.32, p < .025) were associated with increased odds of undergoing surgical resection. Compared with chemotherapy alone, chemoradiotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.83) and surgical resection + adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (aHR 0.37, 95% CI 0.21-0.66) were associated with higher OS (p < .005). Immunotherapy (aHR 0.48, 95% CI 0.28-0.81, p = .006) was also independently associated with higher OS.

Conclusion

A minority of patients with cM1 OCSCC underwent primary site surgical resection. Despite the high rate of positive surgical margins, surgical resection + adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was associated with higher OS than chemotherapy alone, chemoradiotherapy, or surgical resection + adjuvant chemotherapy. Definitive local therapy may benefit select patients with cM1 OCSCC.Level of evidence: 4.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy as a Curative Treatment for De Novo Mucosal Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Feasible Alternative Option for Fragile Patients with Small Lesion: A Systematic Review

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is characterized by a high dose per fraction, well-defined small targets, superior dose conformity, and a steep off-target dose gradient. A literature search was conducted to examine the experience with SBRT as a curative treatment for newly diagnosed mucosal carcinoma of the head and neck (MCHN). Four retrospective case series and one prospective phase I clinical trial published between 2012 and 2020 described 124 patients. SBRT was mainly performed in older patients with different tumor sites. The median size of the planning target volumes ranged from 5.3 to 41 cm3. Different approaches were used to create margins. In two studies, limited elective nodal irradiation was performed. The equivalent doses used were 60-83.33 Gy delivered in five fractions. Considerable heterogeneity was observed in the radiation dose specification. The incidence of grade ≥3 late toxicity was 0-8.3%, with local and regional control ranging from 73% to 100%. Improved or stable quality of life after SBRT was reported in two studies. Curative-intent SBRT for de novo MCHN appears to be an effective and relatively safe treatment for small tumor targets, preferably without concomitant elective tissue irradiation. Standardization of SBRT practice and well-designed prospective clinical trials are needed to better define the role of SBRT in this setting.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for treating primary head and neck cancer and locoregional recurrence: A comprehensive review of the literature

Introduction

Although stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has advance to standard-of-care for many different indications like lung and liver malignancies, it still remains in its infancy for treating head and neck cancer. Nevertheless there is a growing body of experience and evidence, which is summarized in this review Methods A thorough search of the literature was performed and critically reviewed both for SABR as a primary treatment as well as for treating locoregionally recurrent disease in a pre-irradiated field.

Results

There exist only few prospective data published so far for treating head and neck cancer with SABR. In the primary situation especially implementing SABR as a boost after definitive radiotherapy or a single-modality for locally limited, small glottic cancer appear promising. On the other hand, SABR can be a useful modality for treating local recurrence in a pre-irradiated field. However, caution is needed in the case of proximity to a pre-irradiated carotid artery or other serial organs at risk. Usually only limited gross volumes are treated with 3-6 fractions every other day and a cumulative dose of 24-44 Gy in dedicated radiosurgery platforms or modern linacs with the possibility of online image-guidance and adequate immobilsation.

Conclusions

SABR is an innovative, effective and promising treatment modality for small targets, especially in near proximity to organs at risk or in a pre-irradiated region. Prospective trials are further needed for this technique to become standard-of care.

The Evolving Role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Where Do We Stand?

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a precise and conformal radiation therapy (RT) that aims to deliver a high dose of radiation to the tumor whilst sparing surrounding normal tissue, making it an attractive option for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients who are not suitable for the traditional long course of RT with comprehensive RT target volume. Definitive SBRT for HNC has been investigated in different settings, including early stage glottis cancer, and as an alternative to brachytherapy boost after external beam RT. It is also used as a primary treatment option for elderly or medically unfit patients. More recently, an SBRT combination with immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting for HNC showed promising results. Salvage or adjuvant SBRT for HNC can be used in appropriately selected cases. Future studies are warranted to determine the optimum dose and fractionation schedules in any of these indications.

The immunogenic radiation and new players in immunotherapy and targeted therapy for head and neck cancer

Although treatment modalities for head and neck cancer have evolved considerably over the past decades, survival rates have plateaued. The treatment options remained limited to definitive surgery, surgery followed by fractionated radiotherapy with optional chemotherapy, and a definitive combination of fractionated radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Lately, immunotherapy has been introduced as the fourth modality of treatment, mainly administered as a single checkpoint inhibitor for recurrent or metastatic disease. While other regimens and combinations of immunotherapy and targeted therapy are being tested in clinical trials, adapting the appropriate regimens to patients and predicting their outcomes have yet to reach the clinical setting. Radiotherapy is mainly regarded as a means to target cancer cells while minimizing the unwanted peripheral effect. Radiotherapy regimens and fractionation are designed to serve this purpose, while the systemic effect of radiation on the immune response is rarely considered a factor while designing treatment. To bridge this gap, this review will highlight the effect of radiotherapy on the tumor microenvironment locally, and the immune response systemically. We will review the methodology to identify potential targets for therapy in the tumor microenvironment and the scientific basis for combining targeted therapy and radiotherapy. We will describe a current experience in preclinical models to test these combinations and propose how challenges in this realm may be faced. We will review new players in targeted therapy and their utilization to drive immunogenic response against head and neck cancer. We will outline the factors contributing to head and neck cancer heterogeneity and their effect on the response to radiotherapy. We will review in-silico methods to decipher intertumoral and intratumoral heterogeneity and how these algorithms can predict treatment outcomes. We propose that (a) the sequence of surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy should be designed not only to annul cancer directly, but to prime the immune response. (b) Fractionation of radiotherapy and the extent of the irradiated field should facilitate systemic immunity to develop. (c) New players in targeted therapy should be evaluated in translational studies toward clinical trials. (d) Head and neck cancer treatment should be personalized according to patients and tumor-specific factors.

SBRT for elderly oligometastatic patients as a feasible, safe and effective treatment opportunity

The constantly increasing life expectancy is raising the issue of treating oncological older patients, who were traditionally candidates to best supportive care or palliative treatments. Several literature data support SBRT in the treatment of the oligometastatic patient as a potentially curable therapeutic option. However, data on older patients are lacking. This study presents the outcomes of a cohort of 61 oligometastatic patients over the age of 80 years who received SBRT, that was proposed to all patients with a minimum Karnofsky Performance Status ≥ 70 and a life expectancy of at least 6 months, with up to five oligometastatic lesions. Radiotherapy was delivered in 3-10 fractions with VMAT-IGRT technique. Toxicity was retrospectively collected according to CTCAE v4.0. Data were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed for assessing any potential predictive factor for clinical outcomes. A total of 90 oligometastases were treated in 61 patients with median age 82 years (range, 80-90). The most frequent histology was colorectal cancer (27% of cases). Median follow-up was 20 months (range, 2-63). Local control rates at 1- and 2-years were 98.8% and 88.2%, with colorectal histology being associated with worse LC rates (p = 0.014) at univariate analysis. Progression-free survival rates at 1- and 2-years were 48.6% and 30.5%. Oligorecurrent lesions and single oligometastases were associated with better PFS rates (respectively, p = 0.04 and p = 0.011). Overall survival rates were 75% and 60.5%, polymetastatic spread being predictive of worse survival outcomes at multivariate analysis (p = 0.012). No G2 or higher adverse events were recorded. Our study supports the role of SBRT for the treatment of elderly oligometastatic patients, highlighting the possibility to further explore this therapeutic option in the management of older oncological patients.

Approach to Oligometastatic Cancer in the Elderly Patient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with advanced cancer who have "oligometastatic" disease (OMD) have a limited burden of metastatic sites such that they may benefit from definitive therapies with limited toxicities. The incidence of cancers diagnosed in the elderly is increasing and treatment choices for them are often made because of their vulnerability to side effects. The present review discusses treatment of the elderly with OMD considering cancer outcomes and treatment toxicity.

RECENT FINDINGS

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is emerging as a standard in the management of OMD because of its excellent local control and minimal toxicity. Phase II trials suggest that SBRT added to palliative therapy may improve overall survival and may delay the initiation of systemic therapy in OMD patients. Elderly patients are well represented in OMD studies SBRT will contribute significantly to the management of OMD in the elderly patient population by optimizing cancer control and limiting side effects.