Nasopharyngeal cancer: Incidence and prognosis of human papillomavirus and Epstein-Barr virus association at a single North American institution

Comprehensive analysis of recently discovered lncRNA-associated competing endogenous RNA network in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) arises from the epithelium of the nasopharynx and is characterized by geography-dependent incidence. Despite the high mortality rate, specifically in some ethnic groups, the mechanisms underlying NPC pathogenesis are not thoroughly understood and there is an urgent need to detect the potential and clinically applicable biomarkers to ameliorate the overall survival rate and improve the prognosis of patients. In recent years, research has increasingly focused on the importance of long non-coding RNAs (LncRNAs) in cancer progression. LncRNAs play critical roles in regulating gene expression through mechanisms such as competitively binding to microRNAs (CeRNA). While numerous LncRNAs have been studied in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), their potential as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers have not been systematically examined. In the present study, we delve into elucidating the biological functions, molecular mechanisms, and clinical significance of newly identified LncRNAs that serve as sponges for different microRNAs in NPC. We highlight their regulatory mechanisms in promoting cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis, and discuss their implications in diverse cancer-related signaling pathways. Our overall goal is to emboss the fundamental roles of LncRNA-mediated CeRNA networks in NPC progression, which may open up new avenues for determining the pathogenesis of NPC and developing effective prevention and treatment strategies.

Radiotherapy alone versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage II and T3N0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma with adverse features: A propensity score-matched cohort study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Whether concurrent chemoradiotherapy would provide survival benefits in patients with stage II and T3N0 NPC with adverse factors remains unclear in IMRT era. We aimed to assess the value of concurrent chemotherapy compared to IMRT alone in stage II and T3N0 NPC with adverse features.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

287 patients with stage II and T3N0 NPC with adverse factors were retrospectively analyzed, including 98 patients who received IMRT alone (IMRT alone group) and 189 patients who received cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy (CCRT group). The possible prognostic factors were balanced using propensity score matching (PSM). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate the survival rates, and log-rank tests were employed to compare differences between groups.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 90.8 months (interquartile range = 75.6-114.7 months). The IMRT alone and the CCRT group were well matched; however, for all survival-related endpoints, there were no significant differences between them (5-year failure-free survival: 84.3% vs. 82.7%, P value = 0.68; 5-year overall survival: 87.3% vs. 90.6%, P value = 0.11; 5-year distant metastasis-free survival: 92.8% vs. 92.5%, P value = 0.97; 5-year locoregional relapse-free survival: 93.4% vs. 89.9%, P value = 0.30). The incidence of acute toxicities in the IMRT alone group was significantly lower than that in the CCRT group.

CONCLUSION

For patients with stage II and T3N0 NPC with adverse features treated using IMRT, no improvement in survival was gained by adding concurrent chemotherapy; however, the occurrence of acute toxicities increased significantly. For those combined with non-single adverse factors, the comprehensive treatment strategy needs further exploration.

Diabetes can increase the prevalence of EBV infection and worsen the prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Epstein‒Barr virus (EBV) infection is a primary oncogenic factor of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) that elicits epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Although diabetic patients are more susceptible to various infectious diseases, the pathological association with virus-related NPC has not yet been clarified. Herein, we evaluated the influence of diabetes on the clinicopathological changes of 70 patients with NPC. Disease-specific survival (DSS) modified by viral infection was also analysed. The proportion of NPC patients with diabetes was 32.9% (23/70 cases), and 91.3% (21/23 cases) were infected with EBV detected by EBER-I in situ hybridisation. NPC with diabetes showed an effect on EMT evaluated by immunostaining for E-cadherin and vimentin, which was correlated with HbA1c levels. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis determined a HbA1c level of 6.5% as the cut-off value for primary disease death at 2 years [area under the curve (AUC) 0.76; sensitivity 0.64; and specificity 0.81]. High HbA1c levels (≥6.5%) significantly increased the number of lymph node metastases in NPC compared to low HbA1c levels (<6.5%, p<0.01). Diabetic NPC patients had a significantly poorer prognosis than all non-diabetic patients (DSS, 72 months vs not reached, p<0.05). Diabetic EBV-positive NPC patients had a significantly poorer prognosis than non-diabetic EBV-positive patients (DSS, 35 months vs not reached, p<0.01). Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model also suggested that HbA1c ≥6.5% was a significant factor in poor prognosis, with a hazard ratio of 6.84 (p<0.05). Collectively, our results revealed for the first time a high prevalence of EBV infection, poor prognosis and the importance of proper glycaemic control in diabetic NPC patients.

International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors

BACKGROUND

Sinonasal neoplasms, whether benign and malignant, pose a significant challenge to clinicians and represent a model area for multidisciplinary collaboration in order to optimize patient care. The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors (ICSNT) aims to summarize the best available evidence and presents 48 thematic and histopathology-based topics spanning the field.

METHODS

In accordance with prior International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology documents, ICSNT assigned each topic as an Evidence-Based Review with Recommendations, Evidence-Based Review, and Literature Review based on the level of evidence. An international group of multidisciplinary author teams were assembled for the topic reviews using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses format, and completed sections underwent a thorough and iterative consensus-building process. The final document underwent rigorous synthesis and review prior to publication.

RESULTS

The ICSNT document consists of four major sections: general principles, benign neoplasms and lesions, malignant neoplasms, and quality of life and surveillance. It covers 48 conceptual and/or histopathology-based topics relevant to sinonasal neoplasms and masses. Topics with a high level of evidence provided specific recommendations, while other areas summarized the current state of evidence. A final section highlights research opportunities and future directions, contributing to advancing knowledge and community intervention.

CONCLUSION

As an embodiment of the multidisciplinary and collaborative model of care in sinonasal neoplasms and masses, ICSNT was designed as a comprehensive, international, and multidisciplinary collaborative endeavor. Its primary objective is to summarize the existing evidence in the field of sinonasal neoplasms and masses.

Viral oncogenes, viruses, and cancer: a third-generation sequencing perspective on viral integration into the human genome

The link between viruses and cancer has intrigued scientists for decades. Certain viruses have been shown to be vital in the development of various cancers by integrating viral DNA into the host genome and activating viral oncogenes. These viruses include the Human Papillomavirus (HPV), Hepatitis B and C Viruses (HBV and HCV), Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV), and Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus (HTLV-1), which are all linked to the development of a myriad of human cancers. Third-generation sequencing technologies have revolutionized our ability to study viral integration events at unprecedented resolution in recent years. They offer long sequencing capabilities along with the ability to map viral integration sites, assess host gene expression, and track clonal evolution in cancer cells. Recently, researchers have been exploring the application of Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) nanopore sequencing and Pacific BioSciences (PacBio) single-molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing in cancer research. As viral integration is crucial to the development of cancer via viruses, third-generation sequencing would provide a novel approach to studying the relationship interlinking viral oncogenes, viruses, and cancer. This review article explores the molecular mechanisms underlying viral oncogenesis, the role of viruses in cancer development, and the impact of third-generation sequencing on our understanding of viral integration into the human genome.

Double trouble: Synchronous and metachronous primaries confound ctHPVDNA monitoring

BACKGROUND

Human papillomavirus-associated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HPV + HNSCC) occurs in the oropharynx (HPV + OPSCC), sinonasal cavity (HPV + SNSCC), and nasopharynx (HPV + NPC). Circulating tumor HPV DNA (ctHPVDNA) is an accurate tool for diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and recurrence detection. An emerging challenge with ctHPVDNA is that ~7.4% of HPV + HNSCC patients develop synchronous or metachronous HPV+ primaries, which could confound ctHPVDNA monitoring.

METHODS

We describe a 65-year-old patient with T2N1M0 HPV16 + OPSCC and a 55-year-old patient with T2N2M0 HPV16 + OPSCC. Both patients were enrolled in our prospective observational ctHPVDNA study with longitudinal blood collections throughout treatment. Both patients developed multiple HPV+ primaries.

RESULTS

Detailed discussion of the patients' treatment courses, the subsequent diagnoses of their second HPV+ primaries, and their ctHPVDNA monitoring is presented.

CONCLUSIONS

As ctHPVDNA use becomes more prevalent, it is important to recognize that an increase in ctHPVDNA can come not only from the primary tumor or metastatic clones, but also from synchronous or metachronous second primaries.

Clinical presentation and outcome of human papillomavirus-positive nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a North American cohort

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to describe the clinical presentation and outcomes of human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) versus Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive NPC and HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer (OPC).

METHODS

Clinical characteristics and presenting signs/symptoms were compared between patients who had viral-related NPC versus viral-related OPC treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy from 2005 to 2020 and who were matched 1:1 (by tumor and lymph node categories, smoking, age, sex, histology, and year of diagnosis). Locoregional control (LRC), distant control (DC), and overall survival (OS) were compared using the 2005-2018 cohort to maintain 2 years of minimum follow-up. Multivariable analysis was used to evaluate the cohort effect.

RESULTS

Similar to HPV-positive OPC (n = 1531), HPV-positive NPC (n = 29) occurred mostly in White patients compared with EBV-positive NPC (n = 422; 86% vs. 15%; p < .001). Primary tumor volumes were larger in HPV-positive NPC versus EBV-positive NPC (median volume, 51 vs. 23 cm³ ; p = .002), with marginally more Level IB nodal involvement. More patients with HPV-positive NPC complained of local pain (38% vs. 3%; p = .002). The median follow-up for the 2005-2018 cohort was 5.3 years. Patients who had HPV-positive NPC (n = 20) had rates of 3-year LRC (95% vs. 90%; p = .360), DC (75% vs. 87%; p = .188), and OS (84% vs. 89%; p = .311) similar to the rates in those who had EBV-positive NPC (n = 374). Patients who had HPV-positive NPC also had rates of LRC (95% vs. 94%; p = .709) and OS (84% vs. 87%; p = .440) similar to the rates in those who had HPV-positive OPC (n = 1287). The DC rate was lower in patients who had HPV-positive disease (75% vs. 90%; p = .046), but the difference became nonsignificant (p = .220) when the analysis was adjusted for tumor and lymph node categories, smoking, and chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

HPV-positive NPC and EBV-positive NPC seem to be mutually exclusive diseases. Patients who have HPV-positive NPC have greater local symptom burden and larger primary tumors but have similar outcomes compared with patients who have EBV-positive NPC or HPV-positive OPC.