Comparative effectiveness and stage-shift effect of endoscopic exam among newly diagnosed oral cancer patients with different stages in Taiwan

Impact of preceding treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma on synchronous superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) frequently develop synchronous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). With advances in endoscopic technology and widespread screening of synchronous cancers, the detection of synchronous HNSCC and superficial ESCC (SESCC) is increasing. We aimed to evaluate the impact of preceding HNSCC treatment on synchronous SESCC.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study enrolled patients with synchronous HNSCC and SESCC who were treated between January 2010 and December 2023. Tumor size and depth of SESCC before and after HNSCC treatment were evaluated. The factors associated with SESCC progression were investigated.

RESULTS

Of the 299 patients with synchronous HNSCC and SESCC, 134 who underwent preceding HNSCC treatment with follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for SESCC were evaluated. Chemoradiotherapy was the most common treatment for HNSCC (56.0%), followed by surgery (17.2%), radiotherapy (14.9%), local resection (7.5%), and chemotherapy (4.5%). The tumor size of SESCC increased after HNSCC treatment in 18 patients (13.4%). Multivariate analysis revealed that an EGD interval of ≥ 120 days was significantly associated with increased tumor size in SESCC (odds ratio, 6.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.91-23.1). Tumor regrowth was observed in 70.6% of SESCCs that shrank with HNSCC treatment, mostly within six months. Tumor depth aggravation was rare (2.2%), but progression to advanced ESCC was observed in two patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Timely endoscopic follow-up, preferably within 120 days, is crucial for managing synchronous SESCC after HNSCC treatment to prevent tumor progression. Tumor regrowth should be monitored when SESCC shrinks with HNSCC treatment.

Cost-effectiveness of universal esophageal cancer screening for newly diagnosed oral cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Oral and esophageal cancers are globally prevalent, especially in East Asia. Over half of head and neck cancer patients developing second primary esophageal cancer (SPEC) were initially diagnosed with oral cavity cancer (OCC). This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of universal endoscopic screening for early SPEC prevention in newly diagnosed OCC patients at different stages.

METHODS

This study employed Markov cohort models to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of endoscopic SPEC screening post-OCC diagnosis (stages 0 to IV) between screened and non-screened groups. Four surveillance frequencies were assessed: (i) one time, (ii) annual for 3 years, (iii) annual for 10 years, and (iv) annual for life. A hypothetical cohort of 100 000 cases across stages was compared for costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), discounted annually at 3%.

RESULTS

All four screening strategies were beneficial for all OCC stages, especially for early-stage patients, resulting in higher QALYs. Lifetime/annual screening from the payer's perspective proved most favorable, with incremental QALYs of 1.23 at stage 0 and 0.06 at stage IV. Incremental costs for this strategy ranged from NTD 121 331 (USD 4044) at stage 0 to NTD 13 032 (USD 434) at stage IV. Both incremental costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) values indicated cost savings from a societal perspective. The ICER values ranged from NTD -626 440 (USD -20 881) at stage 0 and NTD -475 021 (USD -15 834) at stage IV.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our study provided cost-effectiveness evidences to understanding the cost-effectiveness of endoscopic screening in OCC patients, particularly emphasizing the benefits of early and consistent screening.

Effect of esophageal cancer screening on mortality among patients with oral cancer and second primary esophageal cancer in Taiwan

OBJECTIVE

Oral and esophageal cancer are the fourth and fifth leading causes of cancer deaths among men in Taiwan. Despite a good prognosis for oral cavity cancer patients, survival is worse for those who develop second primary esophageal cancer. There remains no consensus regarding early prevention of potential second primary esophageal cancer in patients with oral cavity cancer. Our study aimed to compare 5-year mortality between endoscopically screened and non-screened patients with oral cavity cancer and second primary esophageal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study identified patients with incident oral cavity cancer and second primary esophageal cancer during 2004 and 2013 using the Taiwan Cancer Registry and National Health Insurance Research Database. We compared 5-year mortality from the second primary esophageal cancer diagnosis date between screened and non-screened groups of patients with oral cavity cancer and second primary esophageal cancer.

RESULTS

A total of 217 screened and 305 non-screened oral cavity cancer patients with second primary esophageal cancer were studied. Endoscopic screening significantly improved early detection of second primary esophageal cancer (adjusted odds ratio: 0.34, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.49) and reduced all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.80; 95 % CI: 0.66-0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral cavity cancer patients with second primary esophageal cancer may have worse overall survival than those without. Early detection of second primary esophageal cancer is a crucial mediator between endoscopic screening and mortality. Endoscopic screening after the diagnosis of incident oral cavity cancer significantly increased early detection and reduced all-cause mortality.

Factors associated with the development of second primary tumours in head and neck cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

The development of second primary tumours (SPTs) is one of the main causes of low survival in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). The aim of this study was to review the evidence about factors associated with developing SPTs in patients with HNC.

METHODS

An updated systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, and the search was performed in Pubmed and Scopus. Only original articles with a cohort or case-control design were included. Article quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

RESULTS

Thirty-six and two case-control studies were included, with quality medium (n = 5) to high (n = 33). Tobacco showed a significant association with SPT development, with risks ranging from 1.41 (95%CI: 1.04-1.91) to 5.52 (95%CI: 2.91-10.49). Regarding alcohol, risks ranged from 1.46 (95%CI: 1.12-1.91) to 21.3 (95%CI: 2.9-156). Location of the index tumour in the hypopharynx/oropharynx, absence of human papillomavirus and presence of a premalignant lesion also increased the risk of SPTs. More controversy was found for sex, age and other clinical factors of the tumour.

CONCLUSION

Toxic lifestyle habits and clinical factors were associated with the risk of SPTs in HNC patients. These findings may improve individualised prevention strategies in its follow-up.