Concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel definitive radiation therapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer

Outcomes following IMRT alone in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma ordinarily managed with concurrent chemo-radiotherapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

We report outcomes following IMRT-alone in patients with head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) ordinarily managed with concurrent chemo-radiotherapy.

MATERIALS/METHODS

HNSCC (excluding T1-2 N0) patients treated with IMRT-alone from 2005 to 2019 were included and restaged according to TNM-8. Overall survival (OS) was stratified by TNM-8 stage subgroups within HPV-positive (HPV + ) and separately within HPV-negative (HPV-) HNSCC. Multivariable analysis (MVA) identified prognostic factors for OS.

RESULTS

A total of 460 patients with HPV + and 623 HPV- HNSCC were identified. Reasons for chemotherapy omission were: age > 70 years and/or frailty (n = 551, 51 %), cisplatin contraindication (n = 241, 22 %), patient' preference (n = 106, 10 %), and clinician's decision (n = 185, 17 %). IMRT was delivered mostly using altered-fractionation: moderately-accelerated (70 Gy/35 fractions [f]/6 weeks [w], 55 %), hypofractionated (60 Gy/25f/5w, 14 %), and hyperfractionated-accelerated (64 Gy/40f/4w, 25 %). Median follow-up was 5.0 years. Five-year OS for HPV + stage-I-single node, stage-I-multiple nodes, stage-II-T1-2 N2, stage-II-T3 N0-N2, and stage-III were 90 %, 79 %%, 80 %, 64 %, and 33 %, and for HPV- stage III, IVA, and IVB were 47 %, 27 %, and 13 %, respectively. MVA confirmed lower OS in HPV + stage-I-multiple nodes (p = 0.03), II-T3 N0-N2 and III (vs stage-I-single node) and HPV- stage IVA/IVB (vs III) (p < 0.01), and marginally lower OS in HPV + stage-II-T3 N0-2 (vs I-single node) (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Altered fractionated IMRT-alone is a valid option for patients with HPV + stage I-single node HNSCC, and an acceptable alternative for elderly/frail or cisplatin ineligible patients with HPV + stage I-multiple nodes and T1-2 N2 HNSCC. Patients with HPV + T3-T4 or N3 and HPV- stage III/IV HNSCC had unsatisfactory OS, requiring further research into alternative options.

Managing Patients with Head and Neck Cancer and Advanced Age or Comorbidities

The dominant treatment paradigm for locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) involves postoperative or definitive radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy. Despite years of research investigating de-intensified treatment, cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy remains the standard, yet it is associated with significant acute and chronic toxicity. However, due to shared risk factors, such as advanced age, and tobacco and alcohol use, patients with HNSCC frequently have comorbid illnesses that impact treatment tolerability, adding complexity to treatment-related decision-making. In addition, many patients have medical contraindications to cisplatin, requiring alternative treatment strategies. It is thus important to consider how well patients are likely to tolerate treatment, and how to adapt treatment in response to a patient's condition, when weighing treatment options. In this review, we aim to offer readers guidance in managing the elderly or comorbid patient with HNSCC, with particular attention to (i) approaching comorbidity and fragility assessment to make determinations on intensity of treatment, (ii) considering primary treatment modality (eg, surgery vs radiotherapy, chemo-radiotherapy vs radiotherapy alone) and (iii) choice of concurrent systemic therapy agent.

Predicting cisplatin tolerability in older adults with head and neck cancer - Insights for improved chemoradiation outcomes

PURPOSE

Cumulative cisplatin doses of ≥ 200 mg/m2 improve survival in adults with head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) undergoing chemoradiation, but many older adults with HNSCC cannot receive this prognostically relevant dose due to toxicities. This study aims to develop predictive models to assess the likelihood of older adults with HNSCC receiving ≥ 200 mg/m2 cisplatin during chemoradiation.

METHODS

366 patients from the SENIOR database, an international cohort of adults ≥ 65 years with HNSCC, received definitive chemoradiation with single-agent cisplatin and were analyzed. A Generalized Linear Model (GLM), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest Model (RFM) were trained and compared for their performance in predicting a cumulative cisplatin dose of ≥ 200 mg/m2.

RESULTS

195 (53 %) patients achieved a cumulative cisplatin dose of ≥ 200 mg/m2. In the GLM, laryngeal carcinoma (β = 1.37, p = 0.01), tumoral p16 positivity (β = 0.69, p = 0.04), higher hemoglobin levels (β = 0.26, p = 0.002), elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration (β = 0.02, p = 0.003), and increased estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (β = 0.02, p = 0.008) were associated with a higher probability of reaching ≥ 200 mg/m2 cisplatin. Hemoglobin, CRP, eGFR, and p16 status constituted the most important features in the SVM and RFM. AUC values for the GLM, SVM, and RFM were 0.70 (95 % CI, 0.67-0.73), 0.71 (95 % CI, 0.68-0.73), and 0.73 (95 % CI, 0.71-0.75), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed predictive models to support clinicians in identifying older adults with HNSCC capable of tolerating ≥ 200 mg/m2 cumulative cisplatin during chemoradiation. Once validated, these models could improve personalized treatments and enhance shared decision-making in older adults with HNSCC.

Radiotherapy with cetuximab or durvalumab for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer in patients with a contraindication to cisplatin (NRG-HN004): an open-label, multicentre, parallel-group, randomised, phase 2/3 trial

BACKGROUND

Management of patients with locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) when cisplatin is contraindicated is controversial. We aimed to assess whether radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant durvalumab would improve outcomes compared with radiotherapy with cetuximab.

METHODS

NRG-HN004 was designed as an open-label, multicentre, parallel-group, randomised, phase 2/3 trial with safety lead-in conducted at 89 academic and community medical centres in North America. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition stage III-IVB p16-negative HNSCC or unfavourable stage I-III p16-positive oropharyngeal or unknown primary carcinoma, who had a contraindication to cisplatin (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] performance status 2, renal or hearing impairment, peripheral neuropathy, aged at least 70 years with moderate or severe comorbidity, or aged younger than 70 years with severe comorbidity). Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) by permuted block randomisation (multiples of 6) to intravenous durvalumab 1500 mg starting 2 weeks before radiotherapy then every 4 weeks starting week 2 of radiotherapy (seven cycles) or intravenous cetuximab 400 mg/m2 1 week before radiotherapy then 250 mg/m2 weekly beginning week 1 of radiotherapy (eight cycles), with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (70 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks). Stratification factors were tumour and nodal stage, ECOG performance status and comorbidity, and primary site and p16 status. The phase 2 primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. There was one prespecified interim futility analysis at 50% of progression-free survival information. If the observed hazard ratio was 1·0 or more, favouring cetuximab, early stopping would be considered. Extended follow-up analysis was post hoc. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03258554, and is closed to enrolment.

FINDINGS

Following a ten-patient safety lead-in, the phase 2 trial enrolled 190 patients from March 12, 2019, to July 30, 2021, 186 of whom were randomly assigned (123 to durvalumab and 63 to cetuximab). Median age was 72 years (IQR 64-77), 30 (16%) patients were women and 156 (84%) were men. Phase 2 accrual was suspended in July 30, 2021, following an interim futility analysis, and permanently closed in Sept 1, 2022. The phase 3 part of the trial was not conducted. At a median follow-up of 2·3 years (IQR 1·9-3·1) for the extended follow-up (data cutoff July 31, 2023; post-hoc analysis), 2-year progression-free survival was 50·6% (95% CI 41·5-59·8) in the durvalumab group versus 63·7% (51·3-76·1) in the cetuximab group (hazard ratio 1·33 [95% CI 0·84-2·12]; p=0·89). Adverse events were similar in both groups. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were dysphagia (26 [22%] of 119 patients in the durvalumab group vs 18 [30%] of 61 patients in the cetuximab group), lymphopenia (33 [28%] vs 20 [33%]), and oral mucositis (13 [11%] vs 11 [18%]). Four (3%) patients in the durvalumab group and one (2%) in the cetuximab group died from treatment-related adverse events (death not otherwise specified, laryngeal oedema, lung infection, and respiratory failure in the durvalumab group and sudden death not otherwise specified in the cetuximab group).

INTERPRETATION

Our findings suggest that durvalumab did not improve outcomes compared with cetuximab in patients with HNSCC with contraindications to cisplatin. Further trials are needed to define the standard of care for this population.

FUNDING

US National Cancer Institute and AstraZeneca.

Identification and validation of M2 macrophage-related gene signature as a novel prognostic model for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a highly heterogeneous tumor. Commonly used tumor staging don't sufficiently and accurately assess the prognosis of HNSCC patients, resulting in a lack of guidance for clinical treatment decisions. M2 macrophage infiltration has been shown to be strongly associated with the tumor prognosis. In this study, we used the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data to screen for genes co-expressed with M2 macrophages in HNSCC. We used univariate Cox regression to screen out the genes associated with HNSCC prognosis, and constructed a HNSCC prognosis model by Lasso regression analysis. The results confirmed that the model had good predictive value and accuracy for the prognosis of HNSCC patients by survival analysis, ROC curve and nomogram. We divided the HNSCC samples into high-risk and low-risk groups according to the risk score, and the results showed that patients in the high-risk group were more prone to genetic mutations and had a higher tumor mutational burden. In addition, there were significant differences between risk groups in terms of immune cell infiltration and drug sensitivity. The HNSCC prognostic model established in this study may provide guidance for clinical therapeutic decision-making and provide a theoretical foundation for the development of new immunotherapy methods.

Treatment options for cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review

PURPOSE

There is no agreed-upon standard option for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA HNSCC) unfit for cisplatin-based regimens. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to explore alternative options for this population.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases for observational studies and clinical trials (CTs) assessing treatment options for LA HNSCC cisplatin-ineligible patients. This study was registered in PROSPERO under the number CRD42023483156.

RESULTS

This systematic review included 24 studies (18 observational studies and 6 CTs), comprising 4450 LA HNSCC cisplatin-ineligible patients. Most patients were treated with cetuximab-radiotherapy [RT] (50.3%), followed by carboplatin-RT (31.7%). In seven studies reporting median overall survival (OS) in patients treated with cetuximab-RT, it ranged from 12.8 to 46 months. The median OS was superior to 40 months in two studies assessing carboplatin-RT, and superior to 15 months in two studies assessing RT alone. For other regimens such as nimotuzumab-RT, docetaxel-RT, and carboplatin-RT plus paclitaxel the median OS was 21, 25.5, and 28 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review supports the use of a variety of therapy combinations for LA HNSCC cisplatin-ineligible patients. We highlight the urgent need for clinical studies assessing treatment approaches in this population.

Evaluating the clinical efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin and nab-paclitaxel in postoperative early-stage cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

A preclinical study showed that nab-paclitaxel acted as a radiosensitizer and improved tumor radiotherapy in a supra-additive manner. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with cisplatin and nab-paclitaxel in postoperative early-stage cervical cancer with an unfavorable prognosis.

METHODS

Eligible patients with stage IB1-IIA2 (FIGO 2009) cervical carcinoma were recruited retrospectively between August 2018 to May 2021. Patients in both the cisplatin and nab-paclitaxel groups received postoperative radiotherapy and weekly intravenous cisplatin 40 mg/m2 or nab-paclitaxel 100 mg concurrently. An analysis of overall survival, progression-free survival, and adverse reactions was conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 105 early-stage cervical cancer patients were included into our study. The median follow-up time was 38.7 months. The 3-year overall survival and progression-free survival in both group was similar. The cycles of chemotherapy in the cisplatin group were less than those in the nab-paclitaxel group (4.5 vs. 5.0; p = 0.001). Patients in the cisplatin group had a significantly higher frequency of hematological adverse events than patients in the nab-paclitaxel group (P < 0.05). Patients in the cisplatin group had a significantly higher frequency of grade 3-4 leukopenia (46.1% vs. 18.9%; P = 0.03), grade 1-2 thrombocytopenia (32.7% vs. 9.5%; P = 0.014) than patients in the nab-paclitaxel group. Gastrointestinal reactions, such as vomiting, nausea, and anorexia were significantly reduced in the nab-paclitaxel group compared with those in the cisplatin group. Regarding the effects on alopecia, the incidence rate of the nab-paclitaxel group was higher than that of the cisplatin group (P = 0.001). There were no differences between the groups in terms of other adverse reactions.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that nab-paclitaxel-based concurrent radiotherapy is tolerable and effective, and can be considered an alternative to cisplatin chemotherapy.

Comment on "Concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel definitive radiation therapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer"

see pages 230‐231