Adipose to the rescue: peripheral fat fuels liver regeneration

Adipose tissue deficiency impairs transient lipid accumulation and delays liver regeneration following partial hepatectomy in male Seipin knockout mice

BACKGROUND

Liver diseases pose significant health challenges, underscoring the importance of understanding liver regeneration mechanisms. Systemic adipose tissue is thought to be a primary source of lipids and energy during this process; however, empirical data on the effects of adipose tissue deficiency are limited. This study investigates the role of adipose tissue in liver regeneration, focusing on transient regeneration-associated steatosis (TRAS) and hepatocyte proliferation using a Seipin knockout mouse model that mimics severe human lipodystrophy. Additionally, the study explores therapeutic strategies through adipose tissue transplantation.

METHODS

Male Seipin knockout (Seipin-/-) and wild-type (WT) mice underwent 2/3 partial hepatectomy (PHx). Liver and plasma samples were collected at various time points post-surgery. Histological assessments, lipid accumulation analyses and measurements of hepatocyte proliferation markers were conducted. Additionally, normal adipose tissue was transplanted into Seipin-/- mice to evaluate the restoration of liver regeneration.

RESULTS

Seipin-/- mice exhibited significantly reduced liver regeneration rates and impaired TRAS, as evidenced by histological and lipid measurements. While WT mice demonstrated extensive hepatocyte proliferation at 48 and 72 h post-PHx, characterised by increased mitotic cells, elevated proliferating cell nuclear antigen and Ki67 expression, Seipin-/- mice showed delayed hepatocyte proliferation. Notably, adipose tissue transplantation into Seipin-/- mice restored TRAS and improved liver regeneration and hepatocyte proliferation. Conversely, liver-specific overexpression of Seipin in Seipin-/- mice did not affect TRAS or liver regeneration, indicating that the observed effects are primarily due to adipose tissue deficiency rather than hepatic Seipin itself.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic adipose tissue is essential for TRAS and effective liver regeneration following PHx. Its deficiency impairs these processes, while adipose tissue transplantation can restore normal liver function. These findings underscore the critical role of adipose tissue in liver recovery and suggest potential therapeutic strategies for liver diseases associated with lipodystrophies.

KEY POINTS

Seipin-/- mice, which lack adipose tissue, exhibit significantly impaired TRAS and delayed liver regeneration following partial hepatectomy. Transplantation of normal adipose tissue into Seipin-/- mice restores TRAS and enhances liver regeneration, highlighting the essential role of adipose tissue in these processes. Liver-specific overexpression of Seipin has no effect on TRAS and liver regeneration in Seipin-/- mice.

Can the Mitochondrial Metabolic Theory Explain Better the Origin and Management of Cancer than Can the Somatic Mutation Theory?

A theory that can best explain the facts of a phenomenon is more likely to advance knowledge than a theory that is less able to explain the facts. Cancer is generally considered a genetic disease based on the somatic mutation theory (SMT) where mutations in proto-oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes cause dysregulated cell growth. Evidence is reviewed showing that the mitochondrial metabolic theory (MMT) can better account for the hallmarks of cancer than can the SMT. Proliferating cancer cells cannot survive or grow without carbons and nitrogen for the synthesis of metabolites and ATP (Adenosine Triphosphate). Glucose carbons are essential for metabolite synthesis through the glycolysis and pentose phosphate pathways while glutamine nitrogen and carbons are essential for the synthesis of nitrogen-containing metabolites and ATP through the glutaminolysis pathway. Glutamine-dependent mitochondrial substrate level phosphorylation becomes essential for ATP synthesis in cancer cells that over-express the glycolytic pyruvate kinase M2 isoform (PKM2), that have deficient OxPhos, and that can grow in either hypoxia (0.1% oxygen) or in cyanide. The simultaneous targeting of glucose and glutamine, while elevating levels of non-fermentable ketone bodies, offers a simple and parsimonious therapeutic strategy for managing most cancers.

Overall Body Composition and Sarcopenia Are Associated with Poor Liver Hypertrophy Following Portal Vein Embolization

PURPOSE

To explore whether body composition and/or sarcopenia are associated with liver hypertrophy following portal vein embolization (PVE) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM).

METHODS

Patients with CLM who underwent right PVE prior to a planned right hepatectomy were identified from the institutional liver database from 2004 to 2014. Patients were excluded due to previous liver-directed therapy/hepatectomy, right PVE + segment IV embolization, or planned 2-stage hepatectomy. Advanced imaging software was used to measure body compartment volumes (cm²), which were standardized to height (m²) to create an index: skeletal muscle index (SMI), subcutaneous adipose index (SAI), and visceral adipose index (VAI). SMI, gender, and body mass index (BMI) were used to define sarcopenia. The main outcome of interest was hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR) following PVE, which was reported as degree of hypertrophy (DH) and kinetic growth rate (KGR).

RESULTS

Patients were evenly divided into three KGR groups: lower third (KGR:0.7-2.0%), middle third (KGR:2.0-4.1%), and upper third (KGR:4.2-12.3%). Patients in the lower third KGR group had a lower VAI (31.0 vs 53.0 vs 54.5 cm²/m², p = 0.042) and were more commonly sarcopenic (60%) compared to the upper third (20%, p = 0.025). Eighteen patients (40%) met criteria for sarcopenia. Sarcopenic patients had a lower VAI (29.1 vs 57.4 cm²/m², p = 0.004), lesser degree of hypertrophy (8.3% vs 15.2%, p = 0.009), and lower KGR (2.0% vs 4.0%, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Sarcopenia and associated body composition indices are strongly associated with clinically relevant impaired liver regeneration, which may result in increased liver-specific complications following hepatectomy for CLM.

On the Origin of ATP Synthesis in Cancer

ATP is required for mammalian cells to remain viable and to perform genetically programmed functions. Maintenance of the ΔG′_ATP hydrolysis of −56 kJ/mole is the endpoint of both genetic and metabolic processes required for life. Various anomalies in mitochondrial structure and function prevent maximal ATP synthesis through OxPhos in cancer cells. Little ATP synthesis would occur through glycolysis in cancer cells that express the dimeric form of pyruvate kinase M2. Mitochondrial substrate level phosphorylation (mSLP) in the glutamine-driven glutaminolysis pathway, substantiated by the succinate-CoA ligase reaction in the TCA cycle, can partially compensate for reduced ATP synthesis through both OxPhos and glycolysis. A protracted insufficiency of OxPhos coupled with elevated glycolysis and an auxiliary, fully operational mSLP, would cause a cell to enter its default state of unbridled proliferation with consequent dedifferentiation and apoptotic resistance, i.e., cancer. The simultaneous restriction of glucose and glutamine offers a therapeutic strategy for managing cancer.

Mitochondrial Substrate-Level Phosphorylation as Energy Source for Glioblastoma: Review and Hypothesis

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and malignant of the primary adult brain cancers. Ultrastructural and biochemical evidence shows that GBM cells exhibit mitochondrial abnormalities incompatible with energy production through oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos). Under such conditions, the mitochondrial F0-F1 ATP synthase operates in reverse at the expense of ATP hydrolysis to maintain a moderate membrane potential. Moreover, expression of the dimeric M2 isoform of pyruvate kinase in GBM results in diminished ATP output, precluding a significant ATP production from glycolysis. If ATP synthesis through both glycolysis and OxPhos was impeded, then where would GBM cells obtain high-energy phosphates for growth and invasion? Literature is reviewed suggesting that the succinate-CoA ligase reaction in the tricarboxylic acid cycle can substantiate sufficient ATP through mitochondrial substrate-level phosphorylation (mSLP) to maintain GBM growth when OxPhos is impaired. Production of high-energy phosphates would be supported by glutaminolysis—a hallmark of GBM metabolism—through the sequential conversion of glutamine → glutamate → alpha-ketoglutarate → succinyl CoA → succinate. Equally important, provision of ATP through mSLP would maintain the adenine nucleotide translocase in forward mode, thus preventing the reverse-operating F0-F1 ATP synthase from depleting cytosolic ATP reserves. Because glucose and glutamine are the primary fuels driving the rapid growth of GBM and most tumors for that matter, simultaneous restriction of these two substrates or inhibition of mSLP should diminish cancer viability, growth, and invasion.

The E2F2 transcription factor sustains hepatic glycerophospholipid homeostasis in mice

Increasing evidence links metabolic signals to cell proliferation, but the molecular wiring that connects the two core machineries remains largely unknown. E2Fs are master regulators of cellular proliferation. We have recently shown that E2F2 activity facilitates the completion of liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy (PH) by regulating the expression of genes required for S-phase entry. Our study also revealed that E2F2 determines the duration of hepatectomy-induced hepatic steatosis. A transcriptomic analysis of normal adult liver identified “lipid metabolism regulation” as a major E2F2 functional target, suggesting that E2F2 has a role in lipid homeostasis. Here we use wild-type (E2F2^+/+) and E2F2 deficient (E2F2^−/−) mice to investigate the in vivo role of E2F2 in the composition of liver lipids and fatty acids in two metabolically different contexts: quiescence and 48-h post-PH, when cellular proliferation and anabolic demands are maximal. We show that liver regeneration is accompanied by large triglyceride and protein increases without changes in total phospholipids both in E2F2^+/+ and E2F2^−/− mice. Remarkably, we found that the phenotype of quiescent liver tissue from E2F2^−/− mice resembles the phenotype of proliferating E2F2^+/+ liver tissue, characterized by a decreased phosphatidylcholine to phosphatidylethanolamine ratio and a reprogramming of genes involved in generation of choline and ethanolamine derivatives. The diversity of fatty acids in total lipid, triglycerides and phospholipids was essentially preserved on E2F2 loss both in proliferating and non-proliferating liver tissue, although notable exceptions in inflammation-related fatty acids of defined phospholipid classes were detected. Overall, our results indicate that E2F2 activity sustains the hepatic homeostasis of major membrane glycerolipid components while it is dispensable for storage glycerolipid balance.

Analysis of the role of hepatic PPARγ expression during mouse liver regeneration

Mice subjected to partial hepatectomy (PH) develop hypoglycemia, followed by increased systemic lipolysis and hepatic fat accumulation, prior to onset of hepatocellular proliferation. Strategies that disrupt these metabolic events inhibit regeneration. These observations suggest that alterations in metabolism in response to hepatic insufficiency promote liver regeneration. Hepatic expression of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) influences fat accumulation in the liver. Therefore, the studies reported here were undertaken to assess the effects of disruption of hepatic PPARγ expression on hepatic fat accumulation and hepatocellular proliferation during liver regeneration. The results showed that liver regeneration was not suppressed, but rather modestly augmented in liver-specific PPARγ null mice maintained on a normal diet. These animals also exhibited accelerated hepatic cyclin D1 expression. Because hepatic PPARγ expression is increased in experimental models of fatty liver disease in which liver regeneration is impaired, regeneration in liver-specific PPARγ null mice with chronic hepatic steatosis was also examined. In contrast to the results described above, disruption of hepatic PPARγ expression in mice with diet-induced hepatic steatosis resulted in significant suppression of hepatic regeneration.

CONCLUSION

The metabolic and hepatocellular proliferative responses to PH are modestly augmented in liver-specific PPARγ null mice, thus providing additional support for a metabolic model of liver regeneration. Furthermore, regeneration is significantly impaired in liver-specific PPARγ null mice in the setting of diet-induced chronic steatosis, suggesting that pharmacological strategies to augment hepatic PPARγ activity might improve regeneration of the fatty liver.

The influence of skeletal muscle on the regulation of liver:body mass and liver regeneration

The relationship between liver and body mass is exemplified by the precision with which the liver:body mass ratio is restored after partial hepatic resection. Nevertheless, the compartments, against which liver mass is so exquisitely regulated, currently remain undefined. In the studies reported here, we investigated the role of skeletal muscle mass in the regulation of liver:body mass ratio and liver regeneration via the analysis of myostatin-null mice, in which skeletal muscle is hypertrophied. The results showed that liver mass is comparable and liver:body mass significantly diminished in the null animals compared to age-, sex-, and strain-matched controls. In association with these findings, basal hepatic Akt signaling is decreased, and the expression of the target genes of the constitutive androstane receptor and the integrin-linked kinase are dysregulated in the myostatin-null mice. In addition, the baseline expression levels of the regulators of the G1-S phase cell cycle progression in liver are suppressed in the null mice. The initiation of liver regeneration is not impaired in the null animals, although it progresses toward the lower liver:body mass set point. The data show that skeletal muscle is not the body component against which liver mass is positively regulated, and thus they demonstrate a previously unrecognized systemic compartmental specificity for the regulation of liver:body mass ratio.