Bezafibrate Improves GLOBE and UK-PBC Scores and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Pemafibrate improves liver biochemistry and GLOBE scores in patients with primary biliary cholangitis: Nationwide, multicenter study by the Japanese Red Cross Liver Study Group

AIM

We aimed to evaluate the effect of pemafibrate, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α modulator, on patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) complicated by dyslipidemia.

METHODS

In total, 61 patients with PBC (Add-on group: 33 patients on ursodeoxycholic acid [UDCA] + pemafibrate combination therapy; Switch group: 28 patients who switched from UDCA + other fibrates to UDCA + pemafibrate combination therapy) were included in the study. Changes in aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and GLOBE scores were retrospectively analyzed from 6 months before to 12 months after treatment. The POISE criteria were also used to evaluate the treatment efficacy after 12 months.

RESULTS

After 12 months of UDCA + pemafibrate combination therapy, AST significantly decreased from 45 ± 3 to 28 ± 3 U/L (p < 0.05), ALT from 49 ± 5 to 32 ± 5 U/L (p < 0.005), GGT from 155 ± 223 to 91 ± 182 U/L (p < 0.005), and ALP from 1.4 ± 0.9 to 0.9 ± 0.8 × upper limit of normal (p < 0.0005) in all patients. ALT, GGT, and ALP levels were significantly lower after 12 months of UDCA + pemafibrate combination therapy in both the Add-on and Switch groups. After 12 months of combination therapy, the mean GLOBE score of all patients significantly decreased from 0.37 to 0.01 (p < 0.05) and the percentage of patients with a GLOBE score of 0.3 or higher decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with PBC who showed an inadequate response to prior therapy, pemafibrate add-on or switch therapy improved liver biochemistry and GLOBE scores. Pemafibrate may be useful as a second-line drug when UDCA alone is inadequate, or as an alternative after combination therapy with other fibrates.

Obeticholic Acid vs Fibrates as Second-Line Therapy for Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Around 40% of patients diagnosed with Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) experience a suboptimal biochemical response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA).

AIMS

We aimed to compare fibrates and obeticholic acid (OCA) as add-on second-line therapy and evaluate whether these drugs hold superiority over each other.

METHODS

We systematically searched Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies comparing fibrates and OCA published by May 6, 2024. A pooled analysis was conducted to evaluate changes in liver biochemistry and response rates based on validated criteria. Data were expressed as mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes and as Odds Ratio (OR) when binary.

RESULTS

We included 883 patients from 4 studies, 468 (53.0%) under UDCA + OCA. Follow-up time ranged from 6 to 12 months. Patients treated with fibrates have similar mean bilirubin post-intervention values (MD 0.11 × upper limit of normal [ULN]; 95% CI - 0.26 to 0.49) compared to OCA. However, fibrates demonstrated superiority over OCA for percentual reduction in ALP compared to baseline (MD 20.13%; 95% CI 11.84-28.41), ALP post-intervention values (MD - 0.59 xULN; 95% CI - 1.02 to - 0.15), and rate of ALP normalization (OR 32.34; 95% CI 14.54-71.92). Patients treated with fibrates also more frequently met Barcelona (OR 4.28; 95% CI 2.26-8.11), POISE (OR 5.48; 95% CI 2.70-11.13), and Paris II (OR 5.88; 95% CI 3.96-8.74) response criteria.

CONCLUSION

In patients with PBC and an incomplete response to UDCA, fibrates seem to be associated with greater ALP reduction and achievement of response criteria compared to OCA.

Pruritus in Chronic Cholestatic Liver Diseases, Especially in Primary Biliary Cholangitis: A Narrative Review

Patients with chronic cholestatic liver diseases often experience itch and struggle with this symptom. We discuss the mechanism of itch in patients with chronic cholestatic liver diseases, such as primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and others, and their therapies, including ileal bile acid transporter (IBAT) inhibitors. In patients with PBC, there are high serum/plasma concentrations of multiple factors, including bile salts, bilirubin, endogenous opioids, lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), autotaxin, and histamine. Bile salts, bilirubin, LPA, and autotaxin affect itch mediators in the skin and sensory nerves, while the endogenous opioid balance affects mediators in the spinal cord. Itch is sensitized by both the peripheral and central nervous systems. Both mechanisms are involved in itch in patients with chronic cholestatic liver disease. Although IBAT inhibitors have been approved for use in pediatric cholestatic conditions, such as progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis and Alagille syndrome, IBAT inhibition seems to be a promising treatment for chronic refractory itch in patients with PBC. A traditional non-systematic review results in this narrative review. Multidisciplinary cooperation, involving hepatologists, dermatologists, and pharmacists, could provide better treatment for PBC patients suffering from refractory itch. In conclusion, we summarized the existing knowledge on itch caused by chronic cholestatic liver diseases, especially in PBC with a focus on the mechanisms and therapies. This narrative review provides the mechanisms and therapeutic options for itch in patients with chronic cholestatic liver diseases.

Primary Biliary Cholangitis and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Therapy Landscape

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) are rare, and chronic cholestatic diseases that can progress to liver failure. The goals of treatment are to halt the progression of liver disease to cirrhosis and/or liver failure, and alleviate symptoms associated with these diseases. Ursodeoxycholic acid has historically been the first-line treatment of PBC, with obeticholic acid and fibrates used as second-line or adjunctive therapies. However, the treatment landscape is rapidly expanding. Recently, 2 new second-line agents gained US Food and Drug Administration approval for the treatment of PBC, and several other therapies remain under investigation with promising results. Although significant progress has been made in the development of therapies for PBC, there are no current approved treatments of PSC other than liver transplantation although several emerging therapies have shown encouraging results. This review outlines the current and upcoming treatments of PBC and PSC.

Development and external validation of an early prediction model to identify irresponsive patients and prognosis of UDCA treatment in primary biliary cholangitis

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the first-line treatment for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), but 20-40% of patients do not respond well to UDCA. We aimed to develop and validate a prognostic model for the early prediction of patients who nonresponse to UDCA. This retrospective analysis was conducted among patients with primary biliary cholangitis(N = 257) to develop a predictive model for early-stage nonresponse to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy. The model's reliability was subsequently confirmed through external validation in an independent cohort(N = 71). Multivariate cox regression analysis was used to evaluate variables that were significant in the univariate analysis. Total cholesterol, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were the three independent risk factors associated with early biochemical nonresponse to UDCA treatment. Based on these factors, we established a predictive model that possessed good discriminative ability, as reflected by an AUC of 0.862(95%CI = 0.813-0.911). The ROC curve of the external validation set calculated the AUC of 0.916(95%CI:0.823-1.000). In summary, we developed an early predictive model that could identify potential nonresponse factors to UDCA at baseline, which could facilitate risk evaluation and stratification for PBC patients. The NLR and total cholesterol provided a supplementary means for effectively managing PBC patients.

Lipid sensing by PPARα: Role in controlling hepatocyte gene regulatory networks and the metabolic response to fasting

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) constitute a small family of three nuclear receptors that act as lipid sensors, and thereby regulate the transcription of genes having key roles in hepatic and whole-body energy homeostasis, and in other processes (e.g., inflammation), which have far-reaching health consequences. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor isotype α (PPARα) is expressed in oxidative tissues, particularly in the liver, carrying out critical functions during the adaptive fasting response. Advanced omics technologies have provided insight into the vast complexity of the regulation of PPAR expression and activity, as well as their downstream effects on the physiology of the liver and its associated metabolic organs. Here, we provide an overview of the gene regulatory networks controlled by PPARα in the liver in response to fasting. We discuss impacts on liver metabolism, the systemic repercussions and benefits of PPARα-regulated ketogenesis and production of fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21), a fasting- and stress-inducible metabolic hormone. We also highlight current challenges in using novel methods to further improve our knowledge of PPARα in health and disease.

Revisiting PPAR agonists: novel perspectives in the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis

INTRODUCTION

In primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), approximately 40% of the patients respond incompletely to first-line treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), resulting in a poorer prognosis. Although obeticholic acid (OCA) is approved as a second-line therapy, it is not well-tolerated by patients with significant itching or advanced cirrhosis. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonists, including fibrates traditionally known as antihyperlipidemic agents, have emerged as potent alternatives for treating PBC patients with an incomplete response to UDCA.

AREAS COVERED

This article provides a detailed overview of the mechanisms of PPAR agonists and evaluates their efficacy and adverse events, focusing on findings from recent phase III clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

PPAR agonists are significant alternatives in the treatment of PBC, showing the potential to enhance biochemical responses, reduce mortality, and alleviate pruritus. Long-term outcomes for PBC patients, particularly those with advanced disease, and longitudinal data on the antipruritic effects of PPAR agonists require further investigation. Combining PPAR agonists with other treatments and advancing personalized approaches may enhance therapeutic efficacy and patient outcomes. This study provides future perspectives on the roles of PPAR agonists in PBC management.

Association between primary biliary cholangitis with diabetes and cardiovascular diseases: A bidirectional multivariable Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an autoimmune disease often accompanied by multisystem damage. This study aimed to explore the causal association between genetically predicted PBC and diabetes, as well as multiple cardiovascular diseases (CVDs).

METHODS

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary data of PBC in 24,510 individuals of European ancestry from the European Association for the Study of the Liver was used to identify genetically predicted PBC. We conducted 2-sample single-variable Mendelian randomization (SVMR) and multivariable Mendelian randomization (MVMR) to estimate the impacts of PBC on diabetes (N = 17,685 to 318,014) and 20 CVDs from the genetic consortium (N = 171,875 to 1,030,836).

RESULTS

SVMR provided evidence that genetically predicted PBC is associated with an increased risk of type 1 diabetes (T1D), type 2 diabetes (T2D), myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), hypertension, atrial fibrillation (AF), stroke, ischemic stroke, and small-vessel ischemic stroke. Additionally, there was no evidence of a causal association between PBC and coronary atherosclerosis. In the MVMR analysis, PBC maintained independent effects on T1D, HF, MI, and small-vessel ischemic stroke in most models.

CONCLUSION

Our findings revealed the causal effects of PBC on diabetes and 7 CVDs, and no causal relationship was detected between PBC and coronary atherosclerosis.

Long-term outcomes in patients with primary biliary cholangitis complicated with CREST syndrome

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is frequently associated with autoimmune disease. Although PBC complicated with CREST syndrome (PBC-CREST) has been reported, the long-term outcomes of the affected patients have not been fully investigated. Herein, the long-term outcomes of PBC-CREST were evaluated. Next, the GLOBE and UK-PBC scores were validated and compared between the PBC alone and PBC-CREST groups. A total of 302 patients who were diagnosed with PBC between December 1990 and August 2021 at Fukushima Medical University Hospital were included. The liver transplantation (LT)-free survival rates were compared between patients with PBC alone (n = 245) and those with PBC-CREST (n = 57). Moreover, 173 patients, excluding those with liver-related death/LT within 1 year after ursodeoxycholic acid administration, were divided into two subgroups (PBC alone (n = 147) and PBC-CREST (n = 26)), and the GLOBE and UK-PBC scores were compared between the subgroups. The survival rates without LT (3/5/10 years) were 92/87/80% for the PBC-alone group and 98/96/96% for the PBC-CREST group, with a significantly better prognosis in the PBC-CREST group (log-rank P = 0.0172). Multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of CREST syndrome is an independent protective factor for the presence of cirrhosis. The predicted 5/10/15-year risks of liver-related death or LT based on the UK-PBC score were significantly lower in the PBC-CREST group (2.4/7.6/13.2%) than in the PBC-alone group (4.8/11.8/18.8%) (P < 0.05). The predicted 3/5-year LT-free survival rates based on the GLOBE score were significantly higher in the PBC-CREST group (93/88%) than in the PBC-alone group (88/81%) (P < 0.05). Patients with PBC-CREST may have better long-term outcomes than those with PBC alone.

Treatment in primary biliary cholangitis: Beyond ursodeoxycholic acid

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a rare cholestatic immune-mediated liver disease. The clinical course varies from mild to severe, with a substantial group of patients developing cirrhosis within a decade. These patients are at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, decompensation and liver failure. First line Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment improves the cholestatic surrogate markers, and was recently associated with a favorable survival free of liver transplantation, even in case of an incomplete biochemical response. However, despite adequate UDCA therapy, patients remain at risk of liver disease progression. Therefore, on-treatment multifactor-based risk stratification is necessary to identify patients in need of additional therapy. This requires a personalized approach; especially as recent studies suggest that complete biochemical normalization as most stringent response criterion might be preferred in selected patients to optimize their outcome. Today, stricter biochemical goals might actually be reachable with the addition of farnesoid X receptor or peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists, or, in highly-selected cases, use of corticosteroids. Randomized controlled trials showed improvements in the key biochemical surrogate markers with the addition of these drugs, which have also been associated with improved clinical outcome. Considering this evolving PBC landscape, with more versatile treatment options and treatment goals, this review recapitulates the recent insight in UDCA therapy, the selection of patients with a residual risk of liver disease progression and the results of the currently available second line treatment options.

Longitudinal outcomes of obeticholic acid therapy in ursodiol-nonresponsive primary biliary cholangitis: Stratifying the impact of add-on fibrates in real-world practice

BACKGROUND

Suboptimal response to ursodeoxycholic acid occurs in 40% of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients, affecting survival. Achieving a deep response (normalisation of alkaline phosphatase [ALP] and bilirubin ≤0.6 upper limit of normal) improves survival. Yet, the long-term effectiveness of second-line treatments remains uncertain.

AIMS

To evaluate the long-term effectiveness of obeticholic acid (OCA) ± fibrates. Focusing on biochemical response (ALP ≤1.67 times the upper limit of normal, with a decrease of at least 15% from baseline and normal bilirubin levels), normalisation of ALP, deep response and biochemical remission (deep response plus aminotransferase normalisation).

METHODS

We conducted a longitudinal, observational, multicentre study involving ursodeoxyccholic acid non-responsive PBC patients (Paris-II criteria) from Spain and Portugal who received OCA ± fibrates.

RESULTS

Of 255 patients, median follow-up was 35.1 months (IQR: 20.2-53). The biochemical response in the whole cohort was 47.2%, 61.4% and 68.6% at 12, 24 and 36 months. GLOBE-PBC and 5-year UK-PBC scores improved (p < 0.001). Triple therapy (ursodeoxycholic acid plus OCA plus fibrates) had significantly higher response rates than dual therapy (p = 0.001), including ALP normalisation, deep response and biochemical remission (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, triple therapy remained independently associated with biochemical response (p = 0.024), alkaline phosphatase normalisation, deep response and biochemical remission (p < 0.001). Adverse effects occurred in 41.2% of cases, leading to 18.8% discontinuing OCA. Out of 55 patients with cirrhosis, 12 developed decompensation. All with baseline portal hypertension.

CONCLUSION

Triple therapy was superior in achieving therapeutic goals in UDCA-nonresponsive PBC. Decompensation was linked to pre-existing portal hypertension.

Exploring Advanced Therapies for Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Insights from the Gut Microbiota-Bile Acid-Immunity Network

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a cholestatic liver disease characterized by immune-mediated injury to small bile ducts. Although PBC is an autoimmune disease, the effectiveness of conventional immunosuppressive therapy is disappointing. Nearly 40% of PBC patients do not respond to the first-line drug UDCA. Without appropriate intervention, PBC patients eventually progress to liver cirrhosis and even death. There is an urgent need to develop new therapies. The gut-liver axis emphasizes the interconnection between the gut and the liver, and evidence is increasing that gut microbiota and bile acids play an important role in the pathogenesis of cholestatic diseases. Dysbiosis of gut microbiota, imbalance of bile acids, and immune-mediated bile duct injury constitute the triad of pathophysiology in PBC. Autoimmune cholangitis has the potential to be improved through immune system modulation. Considering the failure of conventional immunotherapies and the involvement of gut microbiota and bile acids in the pathogenesis, targeting immune factors associated with them, such as bile acid receptors, microbial-derived molecules, and related specific immune cells, may offer breakthroughs. Understanding the gut microbiota-bile acid network and related immune dysfunctions in PBC provides a new perspective on therapeutic strategies. Therefore, we summarize the latest advances in research of gut microbiota and bile acids in PBC and, for the first time, explore the possibility of related immune factors as novel immunotherapy targets. This article discusses potential therapeutic approaches focusing on regulating gut microbiota, maintaining bile acid homeostasis, their interactions, and related immune factors.

The role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in the regulation of bile acid metabolism

Bile acids are synthesized from cholesterol in the liver. Dysregulation of bile acid homeostasis, characterized by excessive accumulation in the liver, gallbladder and blood, can lead to hepatocellular damage and the development of cholestatic liver disease. Nuclear receptors play a crucial role in the control of bile acid metabolism by efficiently regulating bile acid synthesis and transport in the liver. Among these receptors, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR), a ligand-activated transcription factor belonging to the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily, controls the expression of genes involved in adipogenesis, lipid metabolism, inflammation and glucose homeostasis and has emerged as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of the metabolic syndrome in the past two decades. Emerging evidence suggests that PPAR activation holds promise as a therapeutic target for cholestatic liver disease, as it affects both bile acid production and transport. This review provides a comprehensive overview of recent advances in elucidating the role of PPAR in the regulation of bile acid metabolism, highlighting the current position of PPAR agonists in the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis. By summarizing the specific regulatory effects of PPAR on bile acids, this review contributes to the exploration of novel therapeutic strategies for cholestatic liver diseases.

Efficacy of fibrates in the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis: a meta-analysis

Patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) who respond poorly to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) are increasingly being trialed using fibrates, showing promising results. To further investigate, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the benefit of administrating fibrates to patients with PBC. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases were searched using the keywords "bezafibrate", "fenofibrate", "fibrate", "primary biliary cholangitis" and clinical studies involving the use of fibrates in patients with PBC were included. The primary outcome of this study was the effect of fibrates administration on biochemical markers related to cholestasis in patients with PBC, and the secondary outcome was the incidence of treatment-related adverse events. A total of 20 studies with 4783 participants were included in this study. The results revealed that adding fibrates could significantly reduce the levels of ALP (fibrates vs. placebo, MD: - 370.14, P = 0.04; fibrates + UDCA vs. UDCA, MD: - 184.15, P < 0.01), total cholesterol (MD: - 2.82, P = 0.04), GGT (fibrates vs. placebo, MD: - 140.88, P < 0.01; fibrates + UDCA vs. UDCA, MD: - 130.73, P = 0.04), alleviate pruritus symptoms (RD: - 0.20, 95% CI: - 0.39 ~  - 0.01, P = 0.04), and did not significantly increase the incidence of treatment-related side effects. Fibrates can significantly improve liver biochemical parameters and alleviate pruritus in PBC patients.

Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Promising Emerging Innovative Therapies and Their Impact on GLOBE Scores

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), previously referred to as primary biliary cirrhosis, is an autoimmune disorder leading to the destruction of intra-hepatic bile ducts. If untreated, progressive bile duct damage and cholestasis can lead to ductopenia and result in cirrhosis. Ursodiol, the first drug approved for PBC, has changed the natural history of this disease and improved patient outcomes. Subsequently, several new prediction models incorporating a response to ursodiol were developed. These include the GLOBE score, which was shown to predict long-term outcomes in patients with PBC. In 2016, obeticholic acid (OCA) became the second drug to be approved by the FDA, predominantly based on improvement in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels. This trial has subsequently influenced the design of clinical trials. Several drugs are currently being evaluated as therapeutic options for PBC, with improvement in ALP being a main endpoint. In this review, we will discuss the impact of new therapies on GLOBE scores in patients with PBC.

Machine learning prediction model for treatment responders in patients with primary biliary cholangitis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Treatment response to ursodeoxycholic acid may predict the prognosis of patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Recent studies have suggested the benefits of using machine learning (ML) to forecast complex medical predictions. We aimed to predict treatment response in patients with PBC using ML and pretreatment data.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective study and collected data from 194 patients with PBC who were followed up for at least 12 months after treatment initiation. Patient data were analyzed with five ML models, namely random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGB), decision tree, naïve Bayes, or logistic regression, to predict treatment response using the Paris II criteria. The established models were assessed using an out-of-sample validation. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the efficacy of each algorithm. Overall survival and liver-related deaths were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Compared to logistic regression (AUC = 0.595, P = 0.0219, 0.031 models), ML analyses showed significantly high AUC in the random forest (AUC = 0.84) and XGB (AUC = 0.83) models; however, the AUC was not significantly high for decision tree (AUC = 0.633) or naïve Bayes (AUC = 0.584) models. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significantly improved prognoses in patients predicted to achieve the Paris II criteria by XGB (log-rank = 0.005 and 0.007).

CONCLUSION

ML algorithms could improve treatment response prediction using pretreatment data, which could lead to better prognoses. In addition, the ML model using XGB could predict the prognosis of patients before treatment initiation.

Primary biliary cholangitis: Epidemiology, prognosis, and treatment

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic autoimmune liver disease characterized by a destructive, small duct, and lymphocytic cholangitis, and marked by the presence of antimitochondrial antibodies. The incidence and prevalence of PBC vary widely in different regions and time periods, and although disproportionally more common among White non-Hispanic females, contemporary data show a higher prevalence in males and racial minorities than previously described. Outcomes largely depend on early recognition of the disease and prompt institution of treatment, which, in turn, are directly influenced by provider bias and socioeconomic factors. Ursodeoxycholic acid remains the initial treatment of choice for PBC, with obeticholic acid and fibrates (off-label therapy) reserved as add-on therapy for the management of inadequate responders or those with ursodeoxycholic acid intolerance. Novel and repurposed drugs are currently at different stages of clinical development not only for the treatment of PBC but also for its symptomatic management. Here, we summarize the most up-to-date data regarding the epidemiology, prognosis, and treatment of PBC, providing clinically useful information for its holistic management.

Efficacy and Safety of Bezafibrate Alone or in Combination with Ursodeoxycholic Acid in Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Bezafibrate (BZF) alone or in combination with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has been used to slow disease progression in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and harms of BZF monotherapy or combination therapy.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP from inception until January 2020, for randomized controlled clinical trials assessing BZF + UDCA versus UDCA monotherapy or BZF monotherapy versus UDCA monotherapy in PBC patients. Additionally, we systematically evaluated data on harms using seven observational studies. Pooled effect estimates were calculated for the outcomes of interest. The certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation).

RESULTS

We identified 7 randomized controlled trials with a total of 279 participants. Comparing BZF + UDCA to UDCA alone, a clinically significant improvement was observed in serum ALP with a mean difference (MD) of - 159.04 U/L (95% CI - 186.45 to - 131.62) and a reduction in gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) (MD - 106.94 IU/L; 95% CI - 151.99 to - 61.89), but not in total bilirubin (TB) or IgM levels. A statistically significant reduction in ALP levels was also noticed with BZF monotherapy compared to UDCA monotherapy. The effect of BZF + UDCA versus UDCA on mortality remains unclear. Across 5 observational studies including 106 patients, one death was reported due to advanced liver disease in an incomplete responder getting treatment with BZF + UDCA. Analysis of observational studies demonstrated improvement in pruritus intensity with BZF.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of BZF alone or in combination with UDCA improved liver biochemistries in patients with PBC, but its effect on mortality, liver-related complications or quality of life remains unknown.

Prognostic utility of albumin-bilirubin grade in Japanese patients with primary biliary cholangitis

Background & Aims

The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score is calculated using serum levels of total bilirubin and albumin as a simple method to assess liver function. This study investigated the ability of baseline ALBI score/grade measurements to assess histological stage and disease progression in individuals with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in a large Japanese nationwide cohort.

Methods

A total of 8,768 Japanese patients with PBC were enrolled between 1980 and 2016 from 469 institutions, among whom 83% received ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) only, 9% received UDCA and bezafibrate, and 8% were given neither drug. Baseline clinical and laboratory parameters were retrospectively retrieved and reviewed from a central database. Associations of ALBI score/grade with histological stage, mortality, and need for liver transplantation (LT) were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models.

Results

During the median follow-up period of 5.3 years, 1,227 patients died (including 789 from liver-related causes) and 113 underwent LT. ALBI score and ALBI grade were significantly associated with Scheuer's classification (both p <0.0001). ALBI grade 2 or 3 had significant associations with all-cause mortality or need for LT as well as liver-related mortality or need for LT according to Cox proportional hazards regression analysis (hazard ratio 3.453, 95% CI 2.942-4.052 and hazard ratio 4.242, 95% CI 3.421-5.260, respectively; both p <0.0001). Cumulative LT-free survival rates at 5 years in the ALBI grade 1, 2, and 3 groups were 97.2%, 82.4%, and 38.8%, respectively, while respective non-liver-related survival rates were 98.1%, 86.0%, and 42.0% (both p <0.0001, log-rank test).

Conclusions

This large nationwide study of patients with PBC suggested that baseline measurements of ALBI grade were a simple non-invasive predictor of prognosis in PBC.

Impact and implications

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an autoimmune liver disease characterized by progressive destruction of intrahepatic bile ducts. This study examined the ability of albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score/grade to estimate histological findings and disease progression in PBC by means of a large-scale nationwide cohort in Japan. ALBI score/grade were significantly associated with Scheuer's classification stage. Baseline ALBI grade measurements may be a simple non-invasive predictor of prognosis in PBC.

The Genetics of Primary Biliary Cholangitis: A GWAS and Post-GWAS Update

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic, progressive cholestatic liver disease in which the small intrahepatic bile ducts are destroyed by autoimmune reactions. Among autoimmune diseases, which are polygenic complex traits caused by the combined contribution of genetic and environmental factors, PBC exhibits the strongest involvement of genetic heritability in disease development. As at December 2022, genome-wide association studies (GWASs) and associated meta-analyses identified approximately 70 PBC susceptibility gene loci in various populations, including those of European and East Asian descent. However, the molecular mechanisms through which these susceptibility loci affect the pathogenesis of PBC are not fully understood. This study provides an overview of current data regarding the genetic factors of PBC as well as post-GWAS approaches to identifying primary functional variants and effector genes in disease-susceptibility loci. Possible mechanisms of these genetic factors in the development of PBC are also discussed, focusing on four major disease pathways identified by in silico gene set analyses, namely, (1) antigen presentation by human leukocyte antigens, (2) interleukin-12-related pathways, (3) cellular responses to tumor necrosis factor, and (4) B cell activation, maturation, and differentiation pathways.

Selected Aspects of the Intricate Background of Immune-Related Cholangiopathies-A Critical Overview

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) are rare immune-related cholangiopathies with still poorly explained pathogenesis. Although triggers of chronic inflammation with subsequent fibrosis that affect cholangiocytes leading to obliteration of bile ducts and conversion to liver cirrhosis are unclear, both disorders are regarded to be multifactorial. Different factors can contribute to the development of hepatocellular injury in the course of progressive cholestasis, including (1) body accumulation of bile acids and their toxicity, (2) decreased food intake and nutrient absorption, (3) gut microbiota transformation, and (4) reorganized host metabolism. Growing evidence suggests that intestinal microbiome composition not only can be altered by liver dysfunction, but in turn, it actively impacts hepatic conditions. In this review, we highlight the role of key factors such as the gut-liver axis, intestinal barrier integrity, bile acid synthesis and circulation, and microbiome composition, which seem to be strongly related to PBC and PSC outcome. Emerging treatments and future therapeutic strategies are also presented.

Ursodeoxycholic acid treatment-induced GLOBE score changes are associated with liver transplantation-free survival in patients with primary biliary cholangitis

BACKGROUND

Treatment of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) can improve the GLOBE score. We aimed to assess the association between changes in the GLOBE score (ΔGLOBE) and liver transplantation (LT)-free survival in patients with PBC who were treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA).

METHODS

Among UDCA-treated patients within the Global PBC cohort, the association between ΔGLOBE ( 0-1 : during first year of UDCA, 1-2 : during second year) and the risk of LT or death was assessed through Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

Overall, 3775 UDCA-treated patients were included; 3424 [90.7%] were female, median age 54.0 (IQR 45.9-62.4) years and median baseline GLOBE score was 0.25 (IQR -0.47 - 0.96). During a median follow-up of 7.2 (IQR 3.7-11.5) years, 730 patients reached the combined endpoint of LT or death. Median ΔGLOBE 0-1 was -0.27 (IQR -0.56 - 0.02). Cox regression analyses, adjusted for pretreatment GLOBE score and ΔGLOBE 0-12 , showed that ΔGLOBE was associated with LT or death (adjusted HR 2.28, 95%CI 1.81-2.87, p <0.001). The interaction between baseline GLOBE score and ΔGLOBE 0-1 was not statistically significant ( p =0.296). The ΔGLOBE 1-2 was associated with LT or death (adjusted HR 2.19, 95%CI 1.67-2.86, p<0.001), independently from the baseline GLOBE score and de change in GLOBE score during the first year of UDCA.

CONCLUSION

UDCA-induced changes in the GLOBE score were significantly associated with LT-free survival in patients with PBC. While the relative risk reduction of LT or death was stable, the absolute risk reduction was heavily dependent on the baseline prognosis of the patient.

Fenofibrate improves GLOBE and UK-PBC scores and histological features in primary biliary cholangitis

BACKGROUND

Fenofibrate (FF) has been suggested as a second-line therapy for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) with suboptimal response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). But its long-term effect is unclear.

METHODS

From a retrospective cohort (N.=838), we enrolled 106 UDCA-refractory PBC patients, among them 62 received UDCA monotherapy (UDCA group) and 44 received FF combined with UDCA (UDCA+FF group). Changes of liver biochemistries and prognosis after treatment were determined. In addition, sequential liver biopsies were used to assess the effect of FF on histological parameters.

RESULTS

We found adding FF could significantly reduce serum levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), but for patients with pretreatment ALP≥1.67 upper limit of normal (ULN), the significant decline of serum ALP was only observed in the UDCA+FF group after 1 year of therapy. The mean GLOBE Score and the liver transplant-free survival predicted by GLOBE Score were both improved significantly in patients receiving UDCA+FF after 1 year of therapy. The liver-related death or liver transplant calculated using UK-PBC risk score was significantly reduced in patients receiving UDCA+FF after 1 year of therapy. Although there was no marked difference in the final histological analysis after 3 years of therapy, patients receiving UDCA+FF had improvements or stabilization in fibrosis (85.7%), and bile duct loss (78.6%) were more than that of patients receiving UDCA (70.6% and 76.5%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Adding FF improves GLOBE and UK-PBC scores and is also associated with the improvements or stabilization of disease features, including fibrosis and ductular injury.

Greater Transplant-Free Survival in Patients Receiving Obeticholic Acid for Primary Biliary Cholangitis in a Clinical Trial Setting Compared to Real-World External Controls

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) Obeticholic Acid (OCA) International Study of Efficacy (POISE) randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial demonstrated that OCA reduced biomarkers associated with adverse clinical outcomes (ie, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase) in patients with PBC. The objective of this study was to evaluate time to first occurrence of liver transplantation or death in patients with OCA in the POISE trial and open-label extension vs comparable non-OCA-treated external controls.

METHODS

Propensity scores were generated for external control patients meeting POISE eligibility criteria from 2 registry studies (Global PBC and UK-PBC) using an index date selected randomly between the first and last date (inclusive) on which eligibility criteria were met. Cox proportional hazards models weighted by inverse probability of treatment assessed time to death or liver transplantation. Additional analyses (Global PBC only) added hepatic decompensation to the composite end point and assessed efficacy in patients with or without cirrhosis.

RESULTS

During the 6-year follow-up, there were 5 deaths or liver transplantations in 209 subjects in the POISE cohort (2.4%), 135 of 1381 patients in the Global PBC control (10.0%), and 281 of 2135 patients in the UK-PBC control (13.2%). The hazard ratios (HRs) for the primary outcome were 0.29 (95% CI, 0.10-0.83) for POISE vs Global PBC and 0.30 (95% CI, 0.12-0.75) for POISE vs UK-PBC. In the Global PBC study, HR was 0.20 (95% CI, 0.03-1.22) for patients with cirrhosis and 0.31 (95% CI, 0.09-1.04) for those without cirrhosis; HR was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.21-0.85) including hepatic decompensation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with OCA in a trial setting had significantly greater transplant-free survival than comparable external control patients.

Treatment of ursodeoxycholic acid with glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants may improve the long-term survival rate in primary biliary cholangitis patients

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an autoimmune cholestatic liver disease. The clinical effectiveness of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) plus glucocorticoids and/or immunosuppressants remains controversial in PBC patients. The study aimed to compare the efficacy of monotherapy and combination therapy in patients with PBC and to assess the factors affecting the efficacy. In this retrospective study, 266 patients diagnosed with PBC were divided into monotherapy group (UDCA), double therapy group (UDCA plus glucocorticoids or immunosuppressants), and triple therapy group (UDCA plus glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants) according to different treatments. Demographic characteristics, immune parameters, biochemistry profiles, and other indicators were evaluated at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year following treatment. The prognosis was evaluated using the Paris II standard. The liver transplant-free survival at 3, 5, 10, and 15 years was predicted by GLOBE score. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS (version 24) software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). The long-term survival rate of the triple therapy group was significantly improved compared with the monotherapy group (P = .005). In addition, multivariate analysis showed that abnormal platelet count, alkaline phosphatase, and albumin levels were risk factors for poor response. When IgG levels were elevated but below twice the upper limit of normal, the clinical benefit was not significant compared with monotherapy (P > .05). Compared with monotherapy and double therapy, triple therapy may improve the long-term survival rate of PBC patients. Abnormal platelet count, alkaline phosphatase, and albumin levels were associated with a poor prognosis.

Incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid in primary biliary cholangitis: criteria, epidemiology, and possible mechanisms

INTRODUCTION

As a common autoimmune disease with the characteristic of early complication, primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) leads to an increasing number of mortalities among people with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) waiting for liver transplantation. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the only approved first-line medicine for PBC, and a good response to treatment could acquire an ideal prognosis. Patients with poor UDCA response usually have more adverse outcomes and worse survival, therefore, the management of this group become a major consideration.

AREAS COVERED

Due to the complexity of race and environment for PBC, different criteria for UDCA response exhibit various predictive performances. Factors affecting UDCA response conditions include gender, age, ethnicity, serum indicators, auto-antibodies, and autoimmune comorbidities, while no agreement has been reached. In this review, we mainly focus on cellular senescence, immune-mediated damage, and vitamin D deficiency as possible mechanisms for UDCA non-responders.

EXPERT OPINION

The pathogenesis of PBC has yet to be clarified. Immunology-related mechanisms and therapy targets ought to be the main effort made for further study. Irrespective of the response condition, UDCA is recommended for routine administration in all PBC patients without contraindication. Ongoing clinical trials of second-line and additional therapy exhibit promising prospects.

Novel Therapies in Primary Biliary Cholangitis: What Is in the Pipeline?

Primary biliary cholangitis is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by inflammation and the progressive destruction of small intrahepatic bile ducts. Current first-line treatment includes ursodeoxycholic acid; however, a significant number of patients have an inadequate response to therapy. These patients are at risk of liver failure requiring liver transplantation and experience a poor quality of life due to refractory symptoms. This manuscript aims to shed light on the current and prospective treatment options that may slow disease progression and improve these patients' symptoms.

Prognostic Scoring Systems in Primary Biliary Cholangitis: An Update

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a complex, chronic disease with a heterogeneous presentation, disease progression, and response to therapy. Several prognostic models based on disease stage and/or treatment response enhance risk stratification and therapeutic management. Recent work on disease modeling proposed early prediction of outcomes at PBC onset, yet this has not been implemented in clinical practice. Although early stratification of patients based on their individual risk of developing end-stage liver disease may prove cost-effective and actually become matter of medical deontology to timely offer the best therapeutic option, given the forthcoming availability of novel, disease-modifying drugs. This review outlines established and novel prognostic systems in PBC and provides some perspectives on the potential role of omics-derived biomarkers in developing reliable risk prediction models and promoting the implementation of personalized medicine in PBC.

Prediction and evaluation of high-risk patients with primary biliary cholangitis receiving ursodeoxycholic acid therapy: an early criterion

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Current treatment guidelines recommend ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) as the first-line treatment for new-diagnosed primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients. However, up to 40% patients are insensitive to UDCA monotherapy, and evaluation of UDCA response at 12 months may result in long period of ineffective treatment. We aimed to develop a new criterion to reliably identify non-response patients much earlier.

METHODS

Five hundred sixty-nine patients with an average of 59 months (Median: 53; IQR:32-79) follow-up periods were randomly divided into either the training (70%) or the validation cohort (30%). The efficiency of different combinations of total bilirubin (TBIL), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) threshold values to predict outcomes was assessed at 1, 3 or 6 month after the initiation of UDCA therapy. The endpoints were defined as adverse outcomes, including liver-related death, liver transplantation and complications of cirrhosis. Adverse outcome-free survival was compared using various published criteria and a proposed new criterion.

RESULTS

A new criterion of evaluating UDCA responses at 1 month was established as: ALP ≤ 2.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN) and AST ≤ 2 × ULN, and TBIL ≤ 1 × ULN (Xi'an criterion). The 5 year adverse outcome-free survival rate of UDCA responders, defined by Xi'an criterion, was 97%, which was significantly higher than that of those non-responders (64%). An accurate distinguishing high-risk patients' capacity of Xi'an criterion was confirmed in both early and late-stage PBC.

CONCLUSIONS

Xi'an criterion has a similar or even higher ability to distinguish high-risk PBC patients than other published criteria. Xi'an criterion can facilitate early identification of patients requiring new therapeutic approaches.

Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors Regulate Hepatic Immunity and Assist in the Treatment of Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Fibrates, which are agonists of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha, have received increasing attention in the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis. Reduced alkaline phosphatase levels and improved clinical outcomes were observed in patients with primary biliary cholangitis with an inadequate response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) monotherapy4 when treated with bezafibrate or fenofibrate combined with UDCA. In contrast to obeticholic acid, which exacerbates pruritus in patients, fibrates have been shown to relieve pruritus. Clinical trial outcomes show potential for the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis by targeting peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. It is currently agreed that primary biliary cholangitis is an autoimmune-mediated cholestatic liver disease, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor is a nuclear receptor that regulates the functions of multiple immune cells, thus playing an important role in regulating innate and adaptive immunity. Therefore, this review focuses on the immune disorder of primary biliary cholangitis and summarizes the regulation of hepatic immunity when peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors are targeted for treating primary biliary cholangitis.

Effects of pemafibrate on primary biliary cholangitis with dyslipidemia

AIM

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of pemafibrate (PEM) in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients with dyslipidemia.

METHODS

Patients who were diagnosed with PBC between June 2018 and December 31, 2020 were included in the study if they also had dyslipidemia and their alkaline phosphatase (ALP) or gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) levels remained above the normal range despite taking 600 mg/day ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for at least 6 months. Patients who were treated with UDCA alone were administered PEM as an add-on (PEM-add group), and patients who were treated with UDCA and bezafibrate (BEZ) for at least 6 months were given PEM instead of BEZ (PEM-switch group). Clinical parameters were compared in all patients, and the levels of ALP, GGT, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and creatinine (Cr) were compared between the PEM-add and PEM-switch groups. Improvement in cholangitis was also evaluated.

RESULTS

In the PEM-add group, both ALP and GGT improved in 40 of 46 patients (87.0%). In the PEM-switch group, both ALP and GGT improved in 15 of 29 patients (51.7%). In the PEM-switch group, however, significant improvement was seen in eGFR and Cr.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of PEM is effective in PBC patients with dyslipidemia who are refractory to UDCA monotherapy. In patients using both UDCA and BEZ, there was an advantage in switching to PEM if they had renal damage; however, improvement of ALP and GGT occurred in about 50%.

Primary Biliary Cholangitis and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: Current Knowledge of Pathogenesis and Therapeutics

Cholangiopathies encompass various biliary diseases affecting the biliary epithelium, resulting in cholestasis, inflammation, fibrosis, and ultimately liver cirrhosis. Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) are the most important progressive cholangiopathies in adults. Much research has broadened the scope of disease biology to genetic risk, epigenetic changes, dysregulated mucosal immunity, altered biliary epithelial cell function, and dysbiosis, all of which interact and arise in the context of ill-defined environmental triggers. An in-depth understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of these cholestatic diseases will help clinicians better prevent and treat diseases. In this review, we focus on the main underlying mechanisms of disease initiation and progression, and novel targeted therapeutics beyond currently approved treatments.

PPAR-Targeted Therapies in the Treatment of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Diabetic Patients

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR), ligand-activated transcription factors of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily, have been identified as key metabolic regulators in the liver, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue, among others. As a leading cause of liver disease worldwide, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) cause a significant burden worldwide and therapeutic strategies are needed. This review provides an overview of the evidence on PPAR-targeted treatment of NAFLD and NASH in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. We considered current evidence from clinical trials and observational studies as well as the impact of treatment on comorbid metabolic conditions such as obesity, dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular disease. Future areas of research, such as possible sexually dimorphic effects of PPAR-targeted therapies, are briefly reviewed.

Machine learning in primary biliary cholangitis: A novel approach for risk stratification

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Machine learning (ML) provides new approaches for prognostication through the identification of novel subgroups of patients. We explored whether ML could support disease sub-phenotyping and risk stratification in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC).

METHODS

ML was applied to an international dataset of PBC patients. The dataset was split into a derivation cohort (training set) and a validation cohort (validation set), and key clinical features were analysed. The outcome was a composite of liver-related death or liver transplantation. ML and standard survival analysis were performed.

RESULTS

The training set was composed of 11,819 subjects, while the validation set was composed of 1,069 subjects. ML identified four clusters of patients characterized by different phenotypes and long-term prognosis. Cluster 1 (n = 3566) included patients with excellent prognosis, whereas Cluster 2 (n = 3966) consisted of individuals at worse prognosis differing from Cluster 1 only for albumin levels around the limit of normal. Cluster 3 (n = 2379) included young patients with florid cholestasis and Cluster 4 (n = 1908) comprised advanced cases. Further sub-analyses on the dynamics of albumin within the normal range revealed that ursodeoxycholic acid-induced increase of albumin >1.2 x lower limit of normal (LLN) is associated with improved transplant-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Unsupervised ML identified four novel groups of PBC patients with different phenotypes and prognosis and highlighted subtle variations of albumin within the normal range. Therapy-induced increase of albumin >1.2 x LLN should be considered a treatment goal.

Proof-of-concept study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of saroglitazar in patients with primary biliary cholangitis

BACKGROUND & AIM

Saroglitazar is a novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonist with dual agonistic properties (α/γ). Due to a strong mechanistic rationale, we aimed to test the safety and efficacy of saroglitazar in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) who were either ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) resistant or intolerant.

METHODS

In this double-blind, phase II proof-of-concept trial, 37 patients with PBC were randomized to saroglitazar 4 mg (n = 13), saroglitazar 2 mg (n = 14), or placebo (n = 10) daily for 16 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the reduction in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level at Week 16.

RESULTS

A significant reduction of mean ALP levels was observed at Week 16 relative to baseline in both the saroglitazar 4 mg (least-squares [LS] mean =-163.3 U/L, SE = 25.1, p <0.001) and 2 mg (LS mean =-155.8 U/L, SE = 24.4, p <0.001) groups, compared with placebo (LS mean =-21.1 U/L, SE = 28.9). Treatment with saroglitazar resulted in a rapid reduction of ALP concentration at Week 4 that was sustained through the study duration. At least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event occurred in 11 (84.6%) patients in the saroglitazar 4 mg group, in 12 (85.7%) patients in the 2 mg group and in 8 (80%) patients in the placebo group. Study drug was discontinued in 4 patients (3 patients in the 4 mg group and 1 patient in the 2 mg group) due to aminotransferase increases that promptly returned to baseline values after drug discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Saroglitazar at 2 mg and 4 mg daily was tolerated and resulted in rapid and sustained improvements in ALP. Further studies are underway at a daily dose of 2 mg and 1 mg due to the higher incidence of elevated liver enzymes observed with the 4 mg dose. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT03112681 LAY SUMMARY: Saroglitazar resulted in a rapid and sustained improvement in alkaline phosphatase levels in patients with primary biliary cholangitis. The mean percentage reductions in alkaline phosphatase levels were 49% and 51% in the saroglitazar 4 mg and 2 mg groups compared to 3% in the placebo group.

Novel therapeutic targets for cholestatic and fatty liver disease

Cholestatic and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) share several key pathophysiological mechanisms which can be targeted by novel therapeutic concepts that are currently developed for both areas. Nuclear receptors (NRs) are ligand-activated transcriptional regulators of key metabolic processes including hepatic lipid and glucose metabolism, energy expenditure and bile acid (BA) homoeostasis, as well as inflammation, fibrosis and cellular proliferation. Dysregulation of these processes contributes to the pathogenesis and progression of cholestatic as well as fatty liver disease, placing NRs at the forefront of novel therapeutic approaches. This includes BA and fatty acid activated NRs such as farnesoid-X receptor (FXR) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, respectively, for which high affinity therapeutic ligands targeting specific or multiple isoforms have been developed. Moreover, novel liver-specific ligands for thyroid hormone receptor beta 1 complete the spectrum of currently available NR-targeted drugs. Apart from FXR ligands, BA signalling can be targeted by mimetics of FXR-activated fibroblast growth factor 19, modulation of their enterohepatic circulation through uptake inhibitors in hepatocytes and enterocytes, as well as novel BA derivatives undergoing cholehepatic shunting (instead of enterohepatic circulation). Other therapeutic approaches more directly target inflammation and/or fibrosis as critical events of disease progression. Combination strategies synergistically targeting metabolic disturbances, inflammation and fibrosis may be ultimately necessary for successful treatment of these complex and multifactorial disorders.

Rheumatologie und Hepatologie interdisziplinär

Rheumatologische und hepatologische Erkrankungen haben einige Überschneidungen, die für Behandler aus beiden Disziplinen relevant sind. In dieser Übersicht wird ein Schlaglicht auf 2 Erkrankungen geworfen, die sich an der Schnittstelle befinden: Arthropathie bei Hämochromatose und Systemische Sklerose bei Primär Biliärer Cholangitis. Daneben werden hepatologische Fragestellungen bei rheumatologischer Therapie beleuchtet.

Cyr61 Alleviates Cholangitis by Inhibiting Cytotoxic Effects of CD8+ T Cells on Biliary Epithelial Cells

OBJECTIVE

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic progressive cholestatic liver disease. In recent years, researchers have found that cysteine-rich angiogenic inducer 61 (Cyr61, also known as CCN1) has a potential role in reducing portal inflammation in patients with PBC. This study aimed to explore the relationship between Cyr61 and PBC to provide new ideas and an experimental basis for the clinical treatment of PBC.

METHODS

After induction of the overexpression of Cyr61 in a mouse model of PBC using recombinant adenovirus, hematoxylin and eosin staining and pathological scores were used to indicate intrahepatic inflammation and bile duct damage. Real-time PCR was used to detect changes in inflammation-related cytokines in the liver. To further study the mechanism, we assessed whether Cyr61 protects bile duct epithelial cells from cytotoxic effects.

RESULTS

Serum and hepatic Cyr61 levels were increased in the murine model of PBC. Overexpression of Cyr61 alleviated hepatic inflammation and bile duct injury in vivo. Cyr61 inhibited the cytotoxic effects of CD8⁺ T cells by acting on biliary epithelial cells (BECs) in vitro.

CONCLUSION

Our results provide novel insight into the pathogenesis of PBC and suggest that Cyr61 plays a dominant role in the cytotoxic effects on BECs in PBC. Consequently, therapeutic strategies targeting Cyr61 could be a potent therapy for PBC.

Obeticholic Acid and Fibrates in Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Comparative Effects in a Multicentric Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

Obeticholic acid (OCA) and fibrates therapy results in biochemical improvement in placebo-controlled trials in patients with primary biliary cholangitis and insufficient response to ursodeoxycholic acid. There is scarce information outside of clinical trials. Therefore, we have assessed the effectiveness and adverse events of these treatments.

METHODS

Data from patients included in the ColHai registry treated with OCA, fibrates, or both were recorded during a year, as well as adverse events and treatment discontinuation.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients were treated with OCA, 250 with fibrates (81% bezafibrate; 19% fenofibrate), and 15 with OCA plus fibrates. OCA group had baseline significantly higher alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (P = 0.01) and lower platelets (P = 0.03) than fibrates. Both treatments significantly decreased ALP, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), and transaminases and improved Globe score. Albumin and immunoglobulin type M improved in the fibrates group. ALP decrease was higher under fibrates, whereas alanine aminotransferase decline was higher under OCA. Although baseline transaminases and GGT were higher in patients with OCA plus fibrates, significant ALP, GGT, alanine aminotransferase, and Globe score improvement were observed during triple therapy. Adverse events were reported in 14.7% of patients (21.3% OCA; 17.6% fenofibrate; 10.7% bezafibrate), mainly pruritus (10.1% with OCA). Discontinuation was more frequent in fenofibrate treatment mainly because of intolerance or adverse events.

DISCUSSION

Second-line therapy with OCA or fibrates improves hepatic biochemistry and the GLOBE score in primary biliary cholangitis patients with suboptimal response to ursodeoxycholic acid. Simultaneous treatment with OCA and fibrates improved ALP as well.

Definition and Management of Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis and an Incomplete Response to Therapy

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an immune-mediated chronic liver disease characterized by biliary epithelial injury, cholestasis, and progressive fibrosis that can lead to cirrhosis and requirement for liver transplantation. All patients with PBC should receive initial treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), and odds for response are based on characteristics at baseline. It is important to have clear definitions of patients at risk for a poor response to therapy, of biochemical markers of an incomplete response, and standardized management. Patients typically are assessed after 12 months of treatment with UDCA for biochemical markers of response. However, evaluation at 6 months has been proposed for patients with more severe disease or symptoms (such as pruritus or fatigue). Markers of response to therapy include reduced serum levels of alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin (Paris-2, Toronto, GLOBE, and so forth); patients with high levels of total and conjugated bilirubin or levels of alkaline phosphatase more than 1.5-fold the upper limit of normal should be considered for second-line therapy. Patients with adequate biochemical responses can continue UDCA monotherapy. Incomplete responders should be considered for second-line therapies with obeticholic acid (licensed) or fibrates (unlicensed) in addition to continued treatment with UDCA. Patients with PBC should be followed up for life.

Bezafibrate therapy in primary biliary cholangitis refractory to ursodeoxycholic acid: a longitudinal study of paired liver biopsies at 5 years of follow up

BACKGROUND

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the first-line therapy for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). However, nearly 40% of patients have an incomplete response to UDCA. The addition of bezafibrate has shown biochemical benefit in this group of patients.

AIM

To evaluate the long-term effects of UDCA in combination with bezafibrate on histological outcomes in patients with UDCA-refractory PBC.

METHODS

Fifty-nine patients refractory to UDCA were included. Clinical parameters were monitored and paired liver biopsy (PLB) was performed after 5 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the total cohort, 49 subjects were analysed and 31 had PLB at 5 years. Values for serum ALP, AST, ALT and GGT significantly improved with UDCA-bezafibrate. This beneficial effect was observed at 12 months where 86% achieved ALP at normal levels. Analyses of PLB showed a significant decrease in liver damage as reflected by Ludwig (baseline 2.29 ± 1.2, to 1.84 ± 1 at year 5, P = 0.0242) and Ishak (baseline 6.19 ± 2.2 to 4.77 ± 2.2 at year 5, P = 0.0008) scores. Overall, regression of fibrosis was attained in 48% of patients. Furthermore, we observed a significant reduction in the proportion with cirrhosis from 19% at baseline to 3% at 5 years (P < 0.001). These beneficial effects were associated with better predictive risk scores using the GLOBE and UK-PBC prognosis models.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding bezafibrate to UDCA in patients with UDCA-refractory PBC showed a significant decrease in fibrosis and inflammatory histological scores at 5 years. These beneficial effects warrant further evaluation in long-term cohort studies and controlled trials.

Association of bezafibrate with transplant-free survival in patients with primary biliary cholangitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

A beneficial effect of bezafibrate (BZF) on symptoms and biochemical features of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) has been reported in patients with an incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), but long-term effects on survival remain unknown. In Japan, BZF has been used as a de facto second-line therapy for PBC since 2000. Herein, we compared the survival rates between patients treated with and those without BZF in a large nationwide Japanese PBC cohort.

METHODS

All consecutively registered patients of this cohort who started UDCA therapy from 2000 onwards and had a follow-up ≥1 year were included. Association between BZF exposure and mortality or need for liver transplantation (LT) was assessed using time-dependent, multivariable-and propensity score-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Clinical benefit was quantified using the number needed to treat (NNT).

RESULTS

Of 3,908 eligible patients, 3,162 (81%) received UDCA only and 746 (19%) UDCA and BZF over 17,360 and 3,932 patient-years, respectively. During follow-up, 183 deaths (89 liver-related) and 21 LT were registered. Exposure to combination therapy was associated with a significant decrease in all-cause and liver-related mortality or need for LT (adjusted hazard ratios: 0.3253, 95% CI 0.1936-0.5466 and 0.2748, 95% CI 0.1336-0.5655, respectively; p <0.001 for both). This association was consistent across various risk groups at baseline. The NNTs with combination therapy to prevent 1 additional death or LT over 5, 10, and 15 years were 29 (95% CI 22-46), 14 (10-22), and 8 (6-15), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large retrospective cohort study of treatment effects in patients with PBC, the addition of BZF to UDCA was associated with improved prognosis.

LAY SUMMARY

The long-term efficacy of bezafibrate (BZF) on liver transplantation (LT) - free survival in patients with PBC and an incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) remains to be determined. In this Japanese nationwide retrospective cohort study, the use of UDCA-BZF combination therapy, compared to UDCA alone, was associated with a lower risk of all-cause and liver-related mortality or need for LT. These results indicate that BZF is so far the only drug in PBC to have demonstrated efficacy in improving symptoms, biochemical markers, and long-term outcomes.

A consensus integrated care pathway for patients with primary biliary cholangitis: a guideline-based approach to clinical care of patients

INTRODUCTION

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an infrequent, immune-mediated cholestatic liver disease, which can lead to liver fibrosis, cirrhosis and complications of end-stage liver disease. The established goals of treatment of PBC are prevention of end-stage liver disease and amelioration of associated symptoms. The European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) management guidelines provide extensive recommendations on the diagnosis and management of PBC.

AREAS COVERED

This article describes the development by expert consensus of a 'PBC Integrated Patient Care Pathway' to simplify and standardize the management of PBC for clinicians based on current practice.

EXPERT OPINION

Guideline adoption is potentially poor in practice since most patients with PBC in the community are seen by general gastroenterologists or hepatologists without a special interest in autoimmune liver disease. The PBC Integrated Patient Care Pathway is a best practice tool for clinicians designed to complement the EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of PBC patients. It gives clinicians a practical decision tree of the key steps in PBC management, thereby providing a simplified framework and an opportunity for more uniform practice that supports the safe and timely adoption of varied models of care provision to patients with PBC.

Predictors for incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid in primary biliary cholangitis. Data from a national registry of liver disease

Background

The current standard of treatment in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), although a considerable proportion of patients show incomplete response resulting in disease progression.

Objective

This study aimed to assess the prevalence of incomplete response to UDCA and determine associated patients' characteristics.

Methods

Patients with PBC as main diagnosis were included from a national multicentric patient registry—Liver.pt. Main endpoints included incomplete response to UDCA treatment according to Barcelona, Paris I and Paris II criteria, Globe and UK PBC scores and the association between baseline characteristics and incomplete response according to Paris II criteria.

Results

A total of 434 PBC patients were identified, with a mean age of 55 years and 89.2% females. Nearly half of patients were asymptomatic at diagnosis and 93.2% had positive anti‐mitochondrial antibodies. Almost all patients (95.6%) had been prescribed at least one drug for PBC treatment. At the last follow‐up visit, 93.3% were under treatment of which 99.8% received UDCA. Incomplete response to UDCA was observed in 30.7%, 35.3%, 53.7% and 36.4% of patients according to Barcelona, Paris I, Paris II criteria and Globe score, respectively. After adjusting for age and sex, and accordingly to Paris II criteria, the risk for incomplete biochemical response was 25% higher for patients with cirrhosis at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.25; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.02–1.54; p = 0.033) and 35% (95%CI:1.06–1.72; p = 0.016) and 5% (OR = 1.05; 95%CI:1.01–1.10; p = 0.013) for those with elevated gamma‐glutamyl transferase (GGT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP).

Conclusion

A considerable proportion of patients showed incomplete biochemical response to UDCA treatment according to Paris II criteria. Cirrhosis, elevated GGT and ALP at diagnosis were identified as associated risk factors for incomplete response. Early identification of patients at risk of incomplete response could improve treatment care and guide clinical decision to a more careful patient monitorization.

Summarise the established knowledge on this subject

Primary biliary cholangitis is a liver disease that can progress to end‐stage liver disease, with premature death or need for liver transplantation.

Treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) significantly increases liver transplant‐free survival. However, incomplete response to UDCA reduces this beneficial effect.

What are the significant and/or new findings of this study?

By evaluating prevalence and risk factors for UDCA incomplete response through a large multicentric national registry it was found that 53.7% of patients were incomplete responders, according to Paris II criteria, with cirrhosis, elevated gamma‐glutamyl transferase and alkaline phosphatase at diagnosis as the main risk factors.

These findings suggest that patients diagnosed at an advanced stage should be closely monitored and might benefit from novel therapies to improve outcomes if incomplete response is present.