Bleeding Outcomes Following Transesophageal Echocardiography in Patients With Cirrhosis and Esophageal Varices

Role of liver transient elastography in detecting cirrhosis with esophageal and gastric varices and evaluating variceal severity

OBJECTIVE

To explore the application and clinical value of liver transient elastography (TE) in diagnosing and assessing the degree of liver cirrhosis combined with esophageal and gastric varices (EGV).

METHODS

We chose 136 patients with cirrhosis and EGV admitted to the Liver Disease Department of our hospital from December 2022 to December 2024. The patients were divided into mild EGV (n = 71), moderate EGV (n = 40), and severe EGV (n = 25) based on the gastroscopic results, and another 50 cases of healthy physical examination at the same period were admitted into the control group. All cases underwent liver TE, biochemical parameters, and immune parameters examination to observe the diagnostic efficacy of liver TE in cirrhosis combined with EGV and the degree of varices.

RESULTS

The differences in TBIL, ALT, AST, PTA, and other biochemical parameters between all of groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The differences were not statistically significant for the four groups of IgM, IgG, and other immune indices (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in blood flow among these groups (P > 0.05). The interior diameter (ID) of the portal vein, blood flow velocity, and liver stiffness values were significant (P < 0.05). Portal vein ID, blood velocity, and liver stiffness values showed well diagnostic efficacy in cirrhosis with EGV, and liver stiffness values were the best in evaluating cirrhosis with EGV (P < 0.05). Liver stiffness values were more effective in assessing the degree of varices in cirrhosis combined with EGV and the best in diagnosing cirrhosis combined with severe EGV (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The application of liver TE has a high value in diagnosing cirrhosis combined with EGV and their degree of varices, especially in identifying severe curves, which has good clinical value.

Hepatopulmonary syndrome unveiled: Exploring pathogenesis, diagnostic approaches, and therapeutic strategies

Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) is a pulmonary complication of liver cirrhosis that causes an oxygenation defect. Many patients are asymptomatic at diagnosis or may have non-specific symptoms such as dyspnea. Since the diagnostic criteria for HPS have been established, its prevalence has been better estimated. HPS is an important prognostic indicator for patients undergoing evaluation for liver transplant. The implementation of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease exception policy has improved the outcomes of HPS; however, the mortality remains high. Here, we discuss the pathophysiology, diagnostic criteria, and recent experimental studies in HPS.

Usefulness of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography for hemodynamic management of liver transplantation in a patient with massive polycystic liver disease: a case report

BACKGROUND

Hemodynamic management during anesthesia in liver transplantation for patients with polycystic liver disease (PLD) can be more challenging because of the bleeding and hemodynamic alterations due to the markedly enlarged liver. We hereby report a case of PLD wherein transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was employed for optimal hemodynamic monitoring during liver transplantation.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 61-year-old man was scheduled to undergo liver transplantation for massive PLD. Hemodynamic instability was associated with mechanical displacement of the giant cystic liver. TEE results revealed the collapse of the inferior vena cava due to liver displacement. TEE also detected intrathoracic hemorrhage triggered by detachment from the markedly enlarged liver.

CONCLUSION

TEE is a valuable monitoring tool for sharing information with surgeons and diagnostic modality for finding the source of bleeding in liver transplantation for PLD and may contribute majorly to the quality of perioperative management.

Transesophageal echocardiography-associated gastrointestinal injuries: systematic review and pooled rates of gastrointestinal injuries

Upper gastrointestinal (GI) injuries are associated with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) complications. We reviewed rates and various types of complications with GI injuries. A comprehensive literature search using five databases was conducted. Pooled rates were calculated for overall injuries, pooled GI complications, lacerations, and perforations with a 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 26 studies involving 55,319 patients met inclusion criteria. The overall rate of adverse events was 0.51% (95% CI 0.3% to 0.7%). Bleeding was the most commonly reported adverse event, followed by dysphagia and lacerations. The highest rate of adverse events was observed in liver transplant patients (1.35%), followed by critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (1.1%), hospitalized patients (1.1%), patients undergoing intraoperative TEE (0.7%), and those undergoing cardiac procedures (0.67%). The pooled complication rate for bleeding was 0.17% (95% CI 0.1% to 0.3%), while odynophagia/dysphagia had a rate of 0.27% (95% CI -0.1% to 0.5%) and lacerations had a rate of 0.12% (95% CI -0.1% to 0.5%). A subgroup analysis comparing variceal and nonvariceal cohorts from three studies showed no significant difference in bleeding rates. Our study findings showed a low risk of esophageal injury in patients undergoing TEE.

Watch out for the Saurkraut: Weissella confusa endocarditis in a liver transplant candidate

Content available: Audio Recording.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: incidence of variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis undergoing transesophageal echocardiography

BACKGROUND

The presence of esophageal varices is considered a relative contraindication to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) by cardiology professional societies, so gastroenterologists are often consulted to perform upper endoscopy prior to TEE in patients with cirrhosis.

AIM

To perform a systematic review to quantify the risk of bleeding complications in patients with cirrhosis following TEE.

METHODS

Two reviewers searched Ovid MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process and EMBASE databases from January 1992 to May 2021 for studies reporting bleeding complications from TEE in patients with cirrhosis. We calculated the pooled incidence rate of bleeding events using the metaprop command with a random effect model.

RESULTS

We identified 21 studies comprising 4050 unique patients with cirrhosis; 9 studies (n = 3015) assessed the risk of intraoperative TEE during liver transplant (LT) and 12 studies (n = 1035) assessed bleeding risk in patients undergoing TEE for other indications. The pooled incidence of bleeding post-TEE was 0.37% (95% CI 0.04-0.94%) across all studies. Bleeding complications were low among patients undergoing TEE during LT as well as those undergoing TEE for other diagnostic reasons (0.97% vs. 0.004%) and among studies with mean MELD >18 compared to those with mean MELD <18 (0.43% vs. 0.08%). Few studies had a comparator arm, and data on patient-level factors impacting bleeding complications (including degree of liver dysfunction and coagulopathy) were limited across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of bleeding complications following TEE is low in patients with cirrhosis, suggesting TEE is safe and risk stratification with upper endoscopy may not be necessary.

Editorial: variceal haemorrhage-under pressure, not the probe pushing down on me

This article is linked to Odewole et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.16860

Incidence of Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Transesophageal Echocardiography in Patients with Gastroesophageal Varices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is useful for cardiac assessment and intraoperative monitoring. However, the safety of TEE in patients with cirrhosis and gastroesophageal varices has remained uncertain. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding after TEE in patients with varices. The secondary objectives were to compare bleeding risks between patients with and without varices and to determine the incidence of TEE-related esophageal perforation and mortality.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library using the terms "transesophageal echocardiography," "varices," "bleeding," and related terms. Articles describing the incidence of post-TEE bleeding in patients with varices were included. Non-English-language articles were excluded. Risk of bias and level of evidence were assessed using validated scales. The pooled weighted incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding and the risk difference in bleeding were calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Five hundred and sixty-nine articles were identified initially, and 10 articles (comprising of 908 patients) were included. The incidence of post-TEE bleeding in patients with varices was 0.84% (95% CI, 0.34% to 1.56%). When stratified by indication for TEE, the pooled incidence of bleeding was 0.68% (95% CI, 0.11% to 1.63%) for intraoperative TEE and 1.03% (95% CI, 0.23% to 2.29%) for diagnostic TEE. No cases of esophageal perforation or mortality were reported. Six studies included comparator groups of patients without varices, and the bleeding risk was comparable between patients with and those without varices (risk difference, 0.26%; 95% CI, -0.80% to 1.32%; I² = 0%; P = .88). Eight studies had moderate or high risk for bias, and the overall level of evidence was low.

CONCLUSIONS

TEE appears to be associated with low gastrointestinal bleeding incidence in patients with gastroesophageal varices. Nonetheless, results should be treated with caution because of bias and low level of evidence. Large-scale high-quality studies will be required to confirm the safety of TEE in patients with gastroesophageal varices.