Heterologous adenovirus-vector/messenger RNA regimen is associated with improved severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 humoral response in liver transplant recipients

Latin American association for the study of the liver (ALEH) guidance on postoperative care after liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is a well-established therapy for patients with decompensated cirrhosis and early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver transplantation activity varies sharply across Latin American (LATAM) countries due to differences in resources, expertise, and funding and local attitudes toward organ donation and transplantation. This current guidance of postoperative care after LT is the first position paper of the Latin American Association for the Study of the Liver (ALEH) Special Interest Group (SIG), drawing evidence-based recommendations regarding immediate and long-term postoperative care of LT recipients, taking into consideration their applicability in Latin America.

Applications of SARS-CoV-2 serological testing: impact of test performance, sample matrices, and patient characteristics

Laboratory testing has been a key tool in managing the SARS-CoV-2 global pandemic. While rapid antigen and PCR testing has proven useful for diagnosing acute SARS-CoV-2 infections, additional testing methods are required to understand the long-term impact of SARS-CoV-2 infections on immune response. Serological testing, a well-documented laboratory practice, measures the presence of antibodies in a sample to uncover information about host immunity. Although proposed applications of serological testing for clinical use have previously been limited, current research into SARS-CoV-2 has shown growing utility for serological methods in these settings. To name a few, serological testing has been used to identify patients with past infections and long-term active disease and to monitor vaccine efficacy. Test utility and result interpretation, however, are often complicated by factors that include poor test sensitivity early in infection, lack of immune response in some individuals, overlying infection and vaccination responses, lack of standardization of antibody titers/levels between instruments, unknown titers that confer immune protection, and large between-individual biological variation following infection or vaccination. Thus, the three major components of this review will examine (1) factors that affect serological test utility: test performance, testing matrices, seroprevalence concerns and viral variants, (2) patient factors that affect serological response: timing of sampling, age, sex, body mass index, immunosuppression and vaccination, and (3) informative applications of serological testing: identifying past infection, immune surveillance to guide health practices, and examination of protective immunity. SARS-CoV-2 serological testing should be beneficial for clinical care if it is implemented appropriately. However, as with other laboratory developed tests, use of SARS-CoV-2 serology as a testing modality warrants careful consideration of testing limitations and evaluation of its clinical utility.

Evaluation of the humoral response to the third dose of SARS-COV-2 vaccines in liver transplant recipients

Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) commonly develop an unsatisfactory humoral response to vaccines compared to immunocompetent individuals (IC). We have previously evaluated the humoral response in liver transplant recipients (LTR) who received two-dose vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 and reported that 38 % of LTR did not produce anti-Spike antibodies. Thus, we set out to evaluate the humoral response after the third dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. For this purpose, samples from a cohort of 81 LTR and 27 IC were extracted between 21 and 90 days after the third dose. Serology for anti-Spike IgG antibodies and neutralizing antibodies against Wuhan, Delta and Omicron variants were evaluated. We found that 73.5 % of LTR were responders for anti-Spike IgG, while all the IC mounted a measurable response. LTR who responded to the third dose showed significantly lower anti-Spike IgG levels and neutralizing antibodies than IC. We found that there is less neutralization in LTR compared to IC across all variants. Specifically, the neutralization titers in both groups decrease when encountering the Delta variant, and this decline is even more pronounced with the Omicron variant, compared to the Wuhan variant. Furthermore, we identified that the use of high doses of mycophenolate and advanced age were factors that negatively affected the development of anti-Spike IgG antibodies. Regarding vaccine regimes, the regime viral vector/mRNA/mRNA elicited significantly higher responses in LTR compared to other vaccine schemes. In addition to the recommended and necessary booster doses in this population, strategies that achieve adequate immunization should be evaluated.

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of Two Automated SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Immunoassays following Two Doses of mRNA, Adenoviral Vector, and Inactivated Whole-Virus Vaccinations in COVID-19 Naïve Subjects

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available on humoral responses determined by automated neutralization tests following the administration of the three different types of COVID-19 vaccinations. Thus, we here evaluated anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody titers via two different neutralization assays in comparison to total spike antibody levels.

METHODS

Healthy participants (n = 150) were enrolled into three subgroups who were tested 41 (22-65) days after their second dose of mRNA (BNT162b2/mRNA-1273), adenoviral vector (ChAdOx1/Gam-COVID-Vac) and inactivated whole-virus (BBIBP-CorV) vaccines, with no history or serologic evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Neutralizing antibody (N-Ab) titers were analyzed on a Snibe Maglumi^® 800 instrument and a Medcaptain Immu F6^® Analyzer in parallel to anti-SARS-CoV-2 S total antibody (S-Ab) levels (Roche Elecsys^® e602).

RESULTS

Subjects who were administered mRNA vaccines demonstrated significantly higher SARS-CoV-2 N-Ab and S-Ab levels compared to those who received adenoviral vector and inactivated whole-virus vaccinations (p < 0.0001). N-Ab titers determined by the two methods correlated with each other (r = 0.9608; p < 0.0001) and S-Ab levels (r = 0.9432 and r = 0.9324; p < 0.0001, respectively). Based on N-Ab values, a new optimal threshold of Roche S-Ab was calculated (166 BAU/mL) for discrimination of seropositivity showing an AUC value of 0.975 (p < 0.0001). Low post-vaccination N-Ab levels (median value of 0.25 μg/mL or 7.28 AU/mL) were measured in those participants (n = 8) who were infected by SARS-CoV-2 within 6 months after immunizations.

CONCLUSION

Both SARS-CoV-2 N-Ab automated assays are effective to evaluate humoral responses after various COVID-19 vaccines.

Immunogenicity of Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (BBIBP-CorV; Sinopharm) and Short-Term Clinical Outcomes in Vaccinated Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Prospective Cohort Study

BackgroundImmunocompromised patients have lower seroconversion rate in response to COVID-19 vaccination. The aim of this study is to evaluate the humoral immune response with short-term clinical outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients vaccinated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (BBIBP-CorV; Sinopharm).MethodsThis prospective cohort was conducted from March to December 2021 in Abu Ali Sina hospital, Iran. All transplant recipients, older than 18 years were recruited. The patients received two doses of Sinopharm vaccine 4 weeks apart. Immunogenicity was evaluated through assessment of antibodies against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 after the first and second dose of vaccine. The patients were followed up for 6 months after vaccination.ResultsOut of 921 transplant patients, 115 (12.5%) and 239 (26%) had acceptable anti S-RBD immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels after the first and second dose, respectively. Eighty patients (8.68%) got infected with COVID-19 which led to 45 (4.9%) of patients being hospitalized. None of the patients died during follow-up period. Twenty-four (10.9%) liver transplant recipients developed liver enzyme elevation, and increased serum creatinine was observed in 86 (13.5%) kidney transplant patients. Two patients experienced biopsy-proven rejection without any graft loss.ConclusionOur study revealed that humoral response rate of solid organ transplant recipients to Sinopharm vaccine was low.

The impact of COVID-19 on liver transplantation: challenges and perspectives

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic presented unique challenges to patients with decompensated cirrhosis awaiting transplant, with respect to accessing medical facilities for routine clinic visits, imaging, laboratory workup, or endoscopies. There was a delay in organ procurement that led to a decrease in the number of liver transplants (LTs) and an increase in the morality of waitlisted patients at the beginning of the pandemic. LT numbers later equalized to pre-pandemic numbers due to combined efforts and adaptability of transplant centers as well as dynamic guidelines. Due to being immunosuppressed, the demographics of LT patients were at an increased risk of infection. Although there is a higher rate of mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic liver disease, LT itself is not a risk factor for mortality in COVID-19. There was no difference in overall mortality in LT patients compared to non-LT patients, and mortality risk factors were the same: age, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and chronic kidney disease. The most common causes of death were respiratory complications. Liver-related deaths were reported in 1.6% of patients. The optimal timing of liver transplantation post-infection depends on various factors, such as the severity of liver injury, the presence of comorbidities, and the progression of the underlying liver disease. There is not enough data available on COVID-19 cholangiopathy and the number of cases that will be seen in the future that will require LT. There are some concerns of lower immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in LT patients but available evidence suggests that the vaccines are safe and well-tolerated.

Immunogenicity, Immune Dynamics, and Subsequent Response to the Booster Dose of Heterologous versus Homologous Prime-Boost Regimens with Adenoviral Vector and mRNA SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine among Liver Transplant Recipients: A Prospective Study

Background: Heterologous prime-boost vaccination potentially augments the immune response against SARS-CoV-2 in liver transplant (LT) recipients. We investigated immunogenicity induced by different primary prime-boost vaccination protocols and the subsequent response to the booster vaccine among LT recipients. Methods: LT recipients, who received primary immunisation with ChAdOx1/ChAdOx1 or ChAdOx1/BNT162b2, were administered the third dose of mRNA-1273 three months following the primary vaccination. Blood samples were collected before and after primary vaccination and post-booster. The levels of receptor binding domain antibody (anti-RBD) and neutralising antibody (sVNT) and spike-specific T-cell responses were assessed. Results: Among the 89 LT recipients, patients receiving ChAdOx1/BNT162b2 had significantly higher anti-RBD titres, sVNT, and cellular response after primary vaccination than those receiving ChAdOx1/ChAdOx1 (p < 0.05). The antibody response decreased 12 weeks after the primary vaccination. After the booster, humoral and cellular responses significantly improved, with comparable seroconversion rates between the heterologous and homologous groups. Positive sVNT against the wild type occurred in >90% of LT patients, with only 12.3% positive against the Omicron variant. Conclusions: ChAdOx1/BNT162b2 evoked a significantly higher immunological response than ChAdOx1/ChAdOx1 in LT recipients. The booster strategy substantially induced robust immunity against wild type in most patients but was less effective against the Omicron strain.