Effectiveness of optimised care chain for hip fractures in elderly Chinese

The cost-effectiveness of a co-managed care model for elderly hip fracture patients in China: a modelling study

Background

The clinical effectiveness of multidisciplinary co-managed care for hip fracture patients in China has been demonstrated in a multicenter non-randomized controlled study. This study aims to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the co-managed care.

Methods

The study is based on a multicenter clinical trial (n = 2071) in China. We developed a state transition microsimulation model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the co-managed care compared with usual care for hip fracture patients from healthcare system perspective. The costs incorporated into the model included hospitalization costs, post-discharge expenses, and secondary fracture therapy costs. Effectiveness was measured using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Costs and effects were discounted at 5% annually. A simulation cycle length of 1-year and a lifetime horizon were employed. The cost-effectiveness threshold was established at USD 37,118. To address uncertainties, one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted.

Findings

In the base case analysis, the co-managed care group had a lifetime cost of USD 31,571 and achieved an effectiveness of 3.22 QALYs, whereas the usual care group incurred a cost of USD 27,878 and gained 2.85 QALYs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was USD 9981 per QALY gained; thus the co-managed care model was cost-effective. The cost-effectiveness was sensitive to the age of having hip fractures and hospitalization costs in the intervention group.

Interpretation

The co-managed care in hip fracture patients represents value for money, and should be scaled up and prioritized for funding in China.

Funding

The study is supported by Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research (2022-1-2071, 2018-1-2071).

The burden of critical illness among adults in a Swedish region-a population-based point-prevalence study

BACKGROUND

Patients with critical illness have a high risk of mortality. Key decision-making in the health system affecting the outcomes of critically ill patients requires epidemiological evidence, but the burden of critical illness is largely unknown. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of critical illness in a Swedish region. Secondary objectives were to estimate the proportion of hospital inpatients who are critically ill and to describe the in-hospital location of critically ill patients.

METHODS

A prospective, multi-center, population-based, point-prevalence study on specific days in 2017-2018. All adult (> 18 years) in-patients, regardless of admitting specially, in all acute hospitals in Sörmland, and the patients from Sörmland who had been referred to university hospitals, were included. Patients in the operating theatres, with a psychiatric cause of admission, women in active labor and moribund patients, were excluded. All participants were examined by trained data collectors. Critical illness was defined as "a state of ill health with vital organ dysfunction, a high risk of imminent death if care is not provided and a potential for reversibility". The presence of one or more severely deranged vital signs was used to classify critical illness. The prevalence of critical illness was calculated as the number of critically ill patients divided by the number of adults in the region.

RESULTS

A total of 1269 patients were included in the study. Median age was 74 years and 50% of patients were female. Critical illness was present in 133 patients, resulting in an adult population prevalence of critical illness per 100,000 people of 19.4 (95% CI 16.4-23.0). The proportion of patients in hospital who were critically ill was 10.5% (95% CI 8.8-12.3%). Among the critically ill, 125 [95% CI 94.0% (88.4-97.0%)] were cared for in general wards.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of critical illness was higher than previous, indirect estimates. One in ten hospitalized patients were critically ill, the large majority of which were cared for in general wards. This suggests a hidden burden of critical illness of potential public health, health system and hospital management significance.

A Comparative Study of Hip Arthroplasty and Closed Reduction Proximal Femur Nail in the Treatment of Elderly Patients with Hip Fractures

Objective

To compare the clinical effect of hip arthroplasty and closed reduction intramedullary nailing of proximal femur in the treatment of elderly hip fracture patients.

Methods

There are 90 elderly hip fracture patients being recruited in the present study. Fifty patients in Group A received closed reduction intramedullary nailing of proximal femur, and 40 patients in Group B received hip arthroplasty. All patients were followed up for 12 months after surgery, clinical outcomes included surgical indicators, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Harris score, quality of life, mental status, and complications.

Results

The surgery time, bleeding volume, infusion volume of patients in Group A are all significantly lower than those in Group B (p < 0.05), while the weight-bearing activity time and first workout time of Group A are all significantly higher than those in Group B (p < 0.05). The VAS score in patients of Group A at 1 week postoperative is significantly lower than that in patients of Group B (p < 0.05). The Harris score in patients of Group A at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperative are all significantly higher than those in patients of Group B (p < 0.05), and the excellent and good rate of hip function recovery at 12 months postoperative in patient of Group A is significantly lower than that in patients of Group B (80% vs. 95%, p < 0.05). Furthermore, The score of SF-36 standardized physical component, SF-36 standardized mental component and Barthel in patients of Group A at 6 months postoperative are significantly lower than those in patients of Group B (p < 0.05), and the score of mini-mental state examination is significantly higher (p < 0.05), while there are not significantly different at 12 months postoperative (p > 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in Group A was significantly lower than that in Group B (10% vs. 27.5%, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Elderly hip fracture patients treated with closed reduction intramedullary nailing of proximal femur has less surgical trauma and lower complication rates, but slower postoperative recovery compared with hip arthroplasty.