1
|
Holm LL, Doktor TK, Flugt KK, Petersen US, Petersen R, Andresen B. All exons are not created equal-exon vulnerability determines the effect of exonic mutations on splicing. Nucleic Acids Res 2024; 52:4588-4603. [PMID: 38324470 PMCID: PMC11077056 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
It is now widely accepted that aberrant splicing of constitutive exons is often caused by mutations affecting cis-acting splicing regulatory elements (SREs), but there is a misconception that all exons have an equal dependency on SREs and thus a similar vulnerability to aberrant splicing. We demonstrate that some exons are more likely to be affected by exonic splicing mutations (ESMs) due to an inherent vulnerability, which is context dependent and influenced by the strength of exon definition. We have developed VulExMap, a tool which is based on empirical data that can designate whether a constitutive exon is vulnerable. Using VulExMap, we find that only 25% of all exons can be categorized as vulnerable, whereas two-thirds of 359 previously reported ESMs in 75 disease genes are located in vulnerable exons. Because VulExMap analysis is based on empirical data on splicing of exons in their endogenous context, it includes all features important in determining the vulnerability. We believe that VulExMap will be an important tool when assessing the effect of exonic mutations by pinpointing whether they are located in exons vulnerable to ESMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lise L Holm
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
- Villum Center for Bioanalytical Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | - Thomas K Doktor
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
- Villum Center for Bioanalytical Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | - Katharina K Flugt
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
- Villum Center for Bioanalytical Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | - Ulrika S S Petersen
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
- Villum Center for Bioanalytical Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | - Rikke Petersen
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
- Villum Center for Bioanalytical Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
| | - Brage S Andresen
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
- Villum Center for Bioanalytical Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sanoguera-Miralles L, Llinares-Burguet I, Bueno-Martínez E, Ramadane-Morchadi L, Stuani C, Valenzuela-Palomo A, García-Álvarez A, Pérez-Segura P, Buratti E, de la Hoya M, Velasco-Sampedro EA. Comprehensive splicing analysis of the alternatively spliced CHEK2 exons 8 and 10 reveals three enhancer/silencer-rich regions and 38 spliceogenic variants. J Pathol 2024; 262:395-409. [PMID: 38332730 DOI: 10.1002/path.6243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
Splicing is controlled by a large set of regulatory elements (SREs) including splicing enhancers and silencers, which are involved in exon recognition. Variants at these motifs may dysregulate splicing and trigger loss-of-function transcripts associated with disease. Our goal here was to study the alternatively spliced exons 8 and 10 of the breast cancer susceptibility gene CHEK2. For this purpose, we used a previously published minigene with exons 6-10 that produced the expected minigene full-length transcript and replicated the naturally occurring events of exon 8 [Δ(E8)] and exon 10 [Δ(E10)] skipping. We then introduced 12 internal microdeletions of exons 8 and 10 by mutagenesis in order to map SRE-rich intervals by splicing assays in MCF-7 cells. We identified three minimal (10-, 11-, 15-nt) regions essential for exon recognition: c.863_877del [ex8, Δ(E8): 75%] and c.1073_1083del and c.1083_1092del [ex10, Δ(E10): 97% and 62%, respectively]. Then 87 variants found within these intervals were introduced into the wild-type minigene and tested functionally. Thirty-eight of them (44%) impaired splicing, four of which (c.883G>A, c.883G>T, c.884A>T, and c.1080G>T) induced negligible amounts (<5%) of the minigene full-length transcript. Another six variants (c.886G>A, c.886G>T, c.1075G>A, c.1075G>T, c.1076A>T, and c.1078G>T) showed significantly strong impacts (20-50% of the minigene full-length transcript). Thirty-three of the 38 spliceogenic variants were annotated as missense, three as nonsense, and two as synonymous, underlying the fact that any exonic change is capable of disrupting splicing. Moreover, c.883G>A, c.883G>T, and c.884A>T were classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants according to ACMG/AMP (American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology)-based criteria. © 2024 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Sanoguera-Miralles
- Splicing and Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer, Unidad de Excelencia Instituto de Biomedicina y Genética Molecular de Valladolid (IBGM), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas - Universidad de Valladolid (CSIC-UVa), Valladolid, Spain
| | - Inés Llinares-Burguet
- Splicing and Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer, Unidad de Excelencia Instituto de Biomedicina y Genética Molecular de Valladolid (IBGM), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas - Universidad de Valladolid (CSIC-UVa), Valladolid, Spain
| | - Elena Bueno-Martínez
- Splicing and Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer, Unidad de Excelencia Instituto de Biomedicina y Genética Molecular de Valladolid (IBGM), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas - Universidad de Valladolid (CSIC-UVa), Valladolid, Spain
| | - Lobna Ramadane-Morchadi
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory CIBERONC, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristiana Stuani
- Molecular Pathology Lab. International Centre of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Trieste, Italy
| | - Alberto Valenzuela-Palomo
- Splicing and Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer, Unidad de Excelencia Instituto de Biomedicina y Genética Molecular de Valladolid (IBGM), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas - Universidad de Valladolid (CSIC-UVa), Valladolid, Spain
| | - Alicia García-Álvarez
- Splicing and Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer, Unidad de Excelencia Instituto de Biomedicina y Genética Molecular de Valladolid (IBGM), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas - Universidad de Valladolid (CSIC-UVa), Valladolid, Spain
| | - Pedro Pérez-Segura
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory CIBERONC, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Madrid, Spain
| | - Emanuele Buratti
- Molecular Pathology Lab. International Centre of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Trieste, Italy
| | - Miguel de la Hoya
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory CIBERONC, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Madrid, Spain
| | - Eladio A Velasco-Sampedro
- Splicing and Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer, Unidad de Excelencia Instituto de Biomedicina y Genética Molecular de Valladolid (IBGM), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas - Universidad de Valladolid (CSIC-UVa), Valladolid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Davidson AL, Dressel U, Norris S, Canson DM, Glubb DM, Fortuno C, Hollway GE, Parsons MT, Vidgen ME, Holmes O, Koufariotis LT, Lakis V, Leonard C, Wood S, Xu Q, McCart Reed AE, Pickett HA, Al-Shinnag MK, Austin RL, Burke J, Cops EJ, Nichols CB, Goodwin A, Harris MT, Higgins MJ, Ip EL, Kiraly-Borri C, Lau C, Mansour JL, Millward MW, Monnik MJ, Pachter NS, Ragunathan A, Susman RD, Townshend SL, Trainer AH, Troth SL, Tucker KM, Wallis MJ, Walsh M, Williams RA, Winship IM, Newell F, Tudini E, Pearson JV, Poplawski NK, Mar Fan HG, James PA, Spurdle AB, Waddell N, Ward RL. The clinical utility and costs of whole-genome sequencing to detect cancer susceptibility variants-a multi-site prospective cohort study. Genome Med 2023; 15:74. [PMID: 37723522 PMCID: PMC10507925 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-023-01223-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many families and individuals do not meet criteria for a known hereditary cancer syndrome but display unusual clusters of cancers. These families may carry pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes and be at higher risk for developing cancer. METHODS This multi-centre prospective study recruited 195 cancer-affected participants suspected to have a hereditary cancer syndrome for whom previous clinical targeted genetic testing was either not informative or not available. To identify pathogenic disease-causing variants explaining participant presentation, germline whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and a comprehensive cancer virtual gene panel analysis were undertaken. RESULTS Pathogenic variants consistent with the presenting cancer(s) were identified in 5.1% (10/195) of participants and pathogenic variants considered secondary findings with potential risk management implications were identified in another 9.7% (19/195) of participants. Health economic analysis estimated the marginal cost per case with an actionable variant was significantly lower for upfront WGS with virtual panel ($8744AUD) compared to standard testing followed by WGS ($24,894AUD). Financial analysis suggests that national adoption of diagnostic WGS testing would require a ninefold increase in government annual expenditure compared to conventional testing. CONCLUSIONS These findings make a case for replacing conventional testing with WGS to deliver clinically important benefits for cancer patients and families. The uptake of such an approach will depend on the perspectives of different payers on affordability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aimee L Davidson
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Uwe Dressel
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Sarah Norris
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, L2.22 The Quadrangle (A14), Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Daffodil M Canson
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Dylan M Glubb
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Cristina Fortuno
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Georgina E Hollway
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Michael T Parsons
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Miranda E Vidgen
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Australian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Oliver Holmes
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Lambros T Koufariotis
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Vanessa Lakis
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Conrad Leonard
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Scott Wood
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Qinying Xu
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Amy E McCart Reed
- Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Hilda A Pickett
- Children's Medical Research Institute, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Mohammad K Al-Shinnag
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Rachel L Austin
- Australian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Jo Burke
- Tasmanian Clinical Genetics Service, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Elisa J Cops
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Cassandra B Nichols
- Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, WA, Australia
| | - Annabel Goodwin
- Cancer Genetics Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Marion T Harris
- Monash Health Familial Cancer, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Megan J Higgins
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Emilia L Ip
- Cancer Genetics, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Chiyan Lau
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Genomics, Pathology Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Julia L Mansour
- Tasmanian Clinical Genetics Service, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Michael W Millward
- Tasmanian Clinical Genetics Service, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Melissa J Monnik
- Adult Genetics Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Nicholas S Pachter
- Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, WA, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Abiramy Ragunathan
- Familial Cancer Services, The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Rachel D Susman
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Sharron L Townshend
- Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Subiaco, WA, Australia
| | - Alison H Trainer
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Simon L Troth
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Katherine M Tucker
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Medicine and Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Hereditary Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mathew J Wallis
- Tasmanian Clinical Genetics Service, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS, Australia
- School of Medicine and Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Maie Walsh
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Rachel A Williams
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Medicine and Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Hereditary Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ingrid M Winship
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Genomic Medicine and Familial Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Felicity Newell
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Emma Tudini
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Australian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - John V Pearson
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Nicola K Poplawski
- Adult Genetics Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Helen G Mar Fan
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Paul A James
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Amanda B Spurdle
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
| | - Nicola Waddell
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Robyn L Ward
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, L2.22 The Quadrangle (A14), Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ohara H, Hosokawa M, Awaya T, Hagiwara A, Kurosawa R, Sako Y, Ogawa M, Ogasawara M, Noguchi S, Goto Y, Takahashi R, Nishino I, Hagiwara M. Branchpoints as potential targets of exon-skipping therapies for genetic disorders. MOLECULAR THERAPY. NUCLEIC ACIDS 2023; 33:404-412. [PMID: 37547287 PMCID: PMC10403725 DOI: 10.1016/j.omtn.2023.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
Fukutin (FKTN) c.647+2084G>T creates a pseudo-exon with a premature stop codon, which causes Fukuyama congenital muscular dystrophy (FCMD). We aimed to ameliorate aberrant splicing of FKTN caused by this variant. We screened compounds focusing on splicing regulation using the c.647+2084G>T splicing reporter and discovered that the branchpoint, which is essential for splicing reactions, could be a potential therapeutic target. To confirm the effectiveness of branchpoints as targets for exon skipping, we designed branchpoint-targeted antisense oligonucleotides (BP-AONs). This restored normal FKTN mRNA and protein production in FCMD patient myotubes. We identified a functional BP by detecting splicing intermediates and creating BP mutations in the FKTN reporter gene; this BP was non-redundant and sufficiently blocked by BP-AONs. Next, a BP-AON was designed for a different FCMD-causing variant, which induces pathogenic exon trapping by a common SINE-VNTR-Alu-type retrotransposon. Notably, this BP-AON also restored normal FKTN mRNA and protein production in FCMD patient myotubes. Our findings suggest that BPs could be potential targets in exon-skipping therapeutic strategies for genetic disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroaki Ohara
- Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
- Department of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
- Department of Neuromuscular Research, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo 187-8502, Japan
- Department of Drug Discovery for Intractable Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
| | - Motoyasu Hosokawa
- Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
| | - Tomonari Awaya
- Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
- Laboratory of Tumor Microenvironment and Immunity, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
| | - Atsuko Hagiwara
- Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
| | - Ryo Kurosawa
- Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
| | - Yukiya Sako
- Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
| | - Megumu Ogawa
- Department of Neuromuscular Research, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo 187-8502, Japan
| | - Masashi Ogasawara
- Department of Neuromuscular Research, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo 187-8502, Japan
| | - Satoru Noguchi
- Department of Neuromuscular Research, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo 187-8502, Japan
| | - Yuichi Goto
- Department of Mental Retardation and Birth Defect Research, National Institute of Neurology, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo 187-8502, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Takahashi
- Department of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
| | - Ichizo Nishino
- Department of Neuromuscular Research, National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo 187-8502, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Hagiwara
- Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Walker LC, Hoya MDL, Wiggins GAR, Lindy A, Vincent LM, Parsons MT, Canson DM, Bis-Brewer D, Cass A, Tchourbanov A, Zimmermann H, Byrne AB, Pesaran T, Karam R, Harrison SM, Spurdle AB. Using the ACMG/AMP framework to capture evidence related to predicted and observed impact on splicing: Recommendations from the ClinGen SVI Splicing Subgroup. Am J Hum Genet 2023; 110:1046-1067. [PMID: 37352859 PMCID: PMC10357475 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)/Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) framework for classifying variants uses six evidence categories related to the splicing potential of variants: PVS1, PS3, PP3, BS3, BP4, and BP7. However, the lack of guidance on how to apply such codes has contributed to variation in the specifications developed by different Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) Variant Curation Expert Panels. The ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation Splicing Subgroup was established to refine recommendations for applying ACMG/AMP codes relating to splicing data and computational predictions. We utilized empirically derived splicing evidence to (1) determine the evidence weighting of splicing-related data and appropriate criteria code selection for general use, (2) outline a process for integrating splicing-related considerations when developing a gene-specific PVS1 decision tree, and (3) exemplify methodology to calibrate splice prediction tools. We propose repurposing the PVS1_Strength code to capture splicing assay data that provide experimental evidence for variants resulting in RNA transcript(s) with loss of function. Conversely, BP7 may be used to capture RNA results demonstrating no splicing impact for intronic and synonymous variants. We propose that the PS3/BS3 codes are applied only for well-established assays that measure functional impact not directly captured by RNA-splicing assays. We recommend the application of PS1 based on similarity of predicted RNA-splicing effects for a variant under assessment in comparison with a known pathogenic variant. The recommendations and approaches for consideration and evaluation of RNA-assay evidence described aim to help standardize variant pathogenicity classification processes when interpreting splicing-based evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Logan C Walker
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Miguel de la Hoya
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Madrid, Spain
| | - George A R Wiggins
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | | | | | - Michael T Parsons
- Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Daffodil M Canson
- Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - Alicia B Byrne
- Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Steven M Harrison
- Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA; Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
| | - Amanda B Spurdle
- Population Health Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lakhina Y, Boulis NM, Donsante A. Current and emerging targeted therapies for spinal muscular atrophy. Expert Rev Neurother 2023; 23:1189-1199. [PMID: 37843301 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2023.2268276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder caused by insufficiency or total absence of the survival motor neuron protein due to a mutation in the SMN1 gene. The copy number of its paralog, SMN2, influences disease onset and phenotype severity. Current therapeutic approaches include viral and non-viral modalities affecting gene expression. Regulatory-approved drugs Spinraza (Nusinersen), Zolgensma (Onasemnogene abeparvovec), and Evrysdi (Risdiplam) are still being investigated during clinical trials and show benefits in the long-term for symptomatic and pre-symptomatic patients. However, some ongoing interventions require repeated drug administration. AREAS COVERED In this review, the authors describe the existing therapy based on point of application, focusing on recent clinical trials of antisense oligonucleotides, viral gene therapy, and splice modulators and thepotential routes for correcting the mutation to provide therapeutic levels of SMN protein. EXPERT OPINION In the opinion of the authors, multiple treatment options for patients with SMA shifted the treatment paradigm from palliative supportive care to improvedmotor function, increased survival, and greater quality of life for such patients. They further believe that the future in SMA treatment development lies incombining existing treatment options, targeting aspects of the disease refractory to these treatments, and using gene editing technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuliya Lakhina
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Walker LC, de la Hoya M, Wiggins GA, Lindy A, Vincent LM, Parsons M, Canson DM, Bis-Brewer D, Cass A, Tchourbanov A, Zimmermann H, Byrne AB, Pesaran T, Karam R, Harrison SM, Spurdle AB. APPLICATION OF THE ACMG/AMP FRAMEWORK TO CAPTURE EVIDENCE RELEVANT TO PREDICTED AND OBSERVED IMPACT ON SPLICING: RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE CLINGEN SVI SPLICING SUBGROUP. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.02.24.23286431. [PMID: 36865205 PMCID: PMC9980257 DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.24.23286431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) framework for classifying variants uses six evidence categories related to the splicing potential of variants: PVS1 (null variant in a gene where loss-of-function is the mechanism of disease), PS3 (functional assays show damaging effect on splicing), PP3 (computational evidence supports a splicing effect), BS3 (functional assays show no damaging effect on splicing), BP4 (computational evidence suggests no splicing impact), and BP7 (silent change with no predicted impact on splicing). However, the lack of guidance on how to apply such codes has contributed to variation in the specifications developed by different Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) Variant Curation Expert Panels. The ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation (SVI) Splicing Subgroup was established to refine recommendations for applying ACMG/AMP codes relating to splicing data and computational predictions. Our study utilised empirically derived splicing evidence to: 1) determine the evidence weighting of splicing-related data and appropriate criteria code selection for general use, 2) outline a process for integrating splicing-related considerations when developing a gene-specific PVS1 decision tree, and 3) exemplify methodology to calibrate bioinformatic splice prediction tools. We propose repurposing of the PVS1_Strength code to capture splicing assay data that provide experimental evidence for variants resulting in RNA transcript(s) with loss of function. Conversely BP7 may be used to capture RNA results demonstrating no impact on splicing for both intronic and synonymous variants, and for missense variants if protein functional impact has been excluded. Furthermore, we propose that the PS3 and BS3 codes are applied only for well-established assays that measure functional impact that is not directly captured by RNA splicing assays. We recommend the application of PS1 based on similarity of predicted RNA splicing effects for a variant under assessment in comparison to a known Pathogenic variant. The recommendations and approaches for consideration and evaluation of RNA assay evidence described aim to help standardise variant pathogenicity classification processes and result in greater consistency when interpreting splicing-based evidence.
Collapse
|
8
|
Barbosa P, Savisaar R, Carmo-Fonseca M, Fonseca A. Computational prediction of human deep intronic variation. Gigascience 2022; 12:giad085. [PMID: 37878682 PMCID: PMC10599398 DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giad085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The adoption of whole-genome sequencing in genetic screens has facilitated the detection of genetic variation in the intronic regions of genes, far from annotated splice sites. However, selecting an appropriate computational tool to discriminate functionally relevant genetic variants from those with no effect is challenging, particularly for deep intronic regions where independent benchmarks are scarce. RESULTS In this study, we have provided an overview of the computational methods available and the extent to which they can be used to analyze deep intronic variation. We leveraged diverse datasets to extensively evaluate tool performance across different intronic regions, distinguishing between variants that are expected to disrupt splicing through different molecular mechanisms. Notably, we compared the performance of SpliceAI, a widely used sequence-based deep learning model, with that of more recent methods that extend its original implementation. We observed considerable differences in tool performance depending on the region considered, with variants generating cryptic splice sites being better predicted than those that potentially affect splicing regulatory elements. Finally, we devised a novel quantitative assessment of tool interpretability and found that tools providing mechanistic explanations of their predictions are often correct with respect to the ground - information, but the use of these tools results in decreased predictive power when compared to black box methods. CONCLUSIONS Our findings translate into practical recommendations for tool usage and provide a reference framework for applying prediction tools in deep intronic regions, enabling more informed decision-making by practitioners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Barbosa
- LASIGE, Departamento de Informática, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016,, Lisboa, Portugal
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028, Lisboa, Portugal
| | | | - Maria Carmo-Fonseca
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Alcides Fonseca
- LASIGE, Departamento de Informática, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016,, Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Thomassen M, Mesman RLS, Hansen TVO, Menendez M, Rossing M, Esteban‐Sánchez A, Tudini E, Törngren T, Parsons MT, Pedersen IS, Teo SH, Kruse TA, Møller P, Borg Å, Jensen UB, Christensen LL, Singer CF, Muhr D, Santamarina M, Brandao R, Andresen BS, Feng B, Canson D, Richardson ME, Karam R, Pesaran T, LaDuca H, Conner BR, Abualkheir N, Hoang L, Calléja FMGR, Andrews L, James PA, Bunyan D, Hamblett A, Radice P, Goldgar DE, Walker LC, Engel C, Claes KBM, Macháčková E, Baralle D, Viel A, Wappenschmidt B, Lazaro C, Vega A, Vreeswijk MPG, de la Hoya M, Spurdle AB. Clinical, splicing, and functional analysis to classify BRCA2 exon 3 variants: Application of a points-based ACMG/AMP approach. Hum Mutat 2022; 43:1921-1944. [PMID: 35979650 PMCID: PMC10946542 DOI: 10.1002/humu.24449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Skipping of BRCA2 exon 3 (∆E3) is a naturally occurring splicing event, complicating clinical classification of variants that may alter ∆E3 expression. This study used multiple evidence types to assess pathogenicity of 85 variants in/near BRCA2 exon 3. Bioinformatically predicted spliceogenic variants underwent mRNA splicing analysis using minigenes and/or patient samples. ∆E3 was measured using quantitative analysis. A mouse embryonic stem cell (mESC) based assay was used to determine the impact of 18 variants on mRNA splicing and protein function. For each variant, population frequency, bioinformatic predictions, clinical data, and existing mRNA splicing and functional results were collated. Variant class was assigned using a gene-specific adaptation of ACMG/AMP guidelines, following a recently proposed points-based system. mRNA and mESC analysis combined identified six variants with transcript and/or functional profiles interpreted as loss of function. Cryptic splice site use for acceptor site variants generated a transcript encoding a shorter protein that retains activity. Overall, 69/85 (81%) variants were classified using the points-based approach. Our analysis shows the value of applying gene-specific ACMG/AMP guidelines using a points-based approach and highlights the consideration of cryptic splice site usage to appropriately assign PVS1 code strength.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mads Thomassen
- Department of Clinical GeneticsOdense University HospitalOdence CDenmark
| | - Romy L. S. Mesman
- Department of Human GeneticsLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenthe Netherlands
| | - Thomas V. O. Hansen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, RigshospitaletCopenhagen University HospitalCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Mireia Menendez
- Hereditary Cancer ProgramCatalan Institute of Oncology, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDTP, CIBERONCHospitalet de LlobregatSpain
| | - Maria Rossing
- Center for Genomic Medicine, RigshospitaletCopenhagen University HospitalCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Ada Esteban‐Sánchez
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos)MadridSpain
| | - Emma Tudini
- Department of Genetics and Computational BiologyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Therese Törngren
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences LundLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - Michael T. Parsons
- Department of Genetics and Computational BiologyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Inge S. Pedersen
- Molecular Diagnostics, Aalborg University HospitalAalborgDenmark
- Clinical Cancer Research CenterAalborg University HospitalAalborgDenmark
- Department of Clinical MedicineAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark
| | - Soo H. Teo
- Breast Cancer Research ProgrammeCancer Research MalaysiaSubang JayaSelangorMalaysia
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
| | - Torben A. Kruse
- Department of Clinical GeneticsOdense University HospitalOdence CDenmark
| | - Pål Møller
- Department of Tumour BiologyThe Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| | - Åke Borg
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences LundLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - Uffe B. Jensen
- Department of Clinical GeneticsAarhus University HospitalAarhus NDenmark
| | | | - Christian F. Singer
- Department of OB/GYN and Comprehensive Cancer CenterMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Daniela Muhr
- Department of OB/GYN and Comprehensive Cancer CenterMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Marta Santamarina
- Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina XenómicaSantiago de CompostelaSpain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, SERGASSantiago de CompostelaSpain
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER)MadridSpain
| | - Rita Brandao
- Department of Clinical GeneticsMaastricht University Medical CenterMaastrichtthe Netherlands
| | - Brage S. Andresen
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and the Villum Center for Bioanalytical SciencesUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
| | - Bing‐Jian Feng
- Department of DermatologyHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of MedicineSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | - Daffodil Canson
- Department of Genetics and Computational BiologyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lesley Andrews
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Care CentreSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Paul A. James
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer CenterMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Dave Bunyan
- Human Development and Health, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
| | - Amanda Hamblett
- Middlesex Health Shoreline Cancer CenterWestbrookConnecticutUSA
| | - Paolo Radice
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of ResearchFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT)MilanItaly
| | - David E. Goldgar
- Department of DermatologyHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of MedicineSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | - Logan C. Walker
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical ScienceUniversity of OtagoChristchurchNew Zealand
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and EpidemiologyUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | | | - Eva Macháčková
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and GeneticsMasaryk Memorial Cancer InstituteBrnoCzech Republic
| | - Diana Baralle
- Human Development and Health, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
| | - Alessandra Viel
- Division of Functional Onco‐genomics and GeneticsCentro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCSAvianoItaly
| | - Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital CologneUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
| | - Conxi Lazaro
- Hereditary Cancer ProgramCatalan Institute of Oncology, ONCOBELL‐IDIBELL‐IDTP, CIBERONCHospitalet de LlobregatSpain
| | - Ana Vega
- Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina XenómicaSantiago de CompostelaSpain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, SERGASSantiago de CompostelaSpain
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER)MadridSpain
| | - ENIGMA Consortium
- Department of Genetics and Computational BiologyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | | | - Miguel de la Hoya
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos)MadridSpain
| | - Amanda B. Spurdle
- Department of Genetics and Computational BiologyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Liu Y, Yeung WSB, Chiu PCN, Cao D. Computational approaches for predicting variant impact: An overview from resources, principles to applications. Front Genet 2022; 13:981005. [PMID: 36246661 PMCID: PMC9559863 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.981005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
One objective of human genetics is to unveil the variants that contribute to human diseases. With the rapid development and wide use of next-generation sequencing (NGS), massive genomic sequence data have been created, making personal genetic information available. Conventional experimental evidence is critical in establishing the relationship between sequence variants and phenotype but with low efficiency. Due to the lack of comprehensive databases and resources which present clinical and experimental evidence on genotype-phenotype relationship, as well as accumulating variants found from NGS, different computational tools that can predict the impact of the variants on phenotype have been greatly developed to bridge the gap. In this review, we present a brief introduction and discussion about the computational approaches for variant impact prediction. Following an innovative manner, we mainly focus on approaches for non-synonymous variants (nsSNVs) impact prediction and categorize them into six classes. Their underlying rationale and constraints, together with the concerns and remedies raised from comparative studies are discussed. We also present how the predictive approaches employed in different research. Although diverse constraints exist, the computational predictive approaches are indispensable in exploring genotype-phenotype relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ye Liu
- Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Fertility Regulation, Reproductive Medicine Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - William S. B. Yeung
- Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Fertility Regulation, Reproductive Medicine Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Philip C. N. Chiu
- Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Fertility Regulation, Reproductive Medicine Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- *Correspondence: Philip C. N. Chiu, ; Dandan Cao,
| | - Dandan Cao
- Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Fertility Regulation, Reproductive Medicine Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
- *Correspondence: Philip C. N. Chiu, ; Dandan Cao,
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Müller L, Ptok J, Nisar A, Antemann J, Grothmann R, Hillebrand F, Brillen AL, Ritchie A, Theiss S, Schaal H. Modeling splicing outcome by combining 5'ss strength and splicing regulatory elements. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:8834-8851. [PMID: 35947702 PMCID: PMC9410876 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Correct pre-mRNA processing in higher eukaryotes vastly depends on splice site recognition. Beyond conserved 5'ss and 3'ss motifs, splicing regulatory elements (SREs) play a pivotal role in this recognition process. Here, we present in silico designed sequences with arbitrary a priori prescribed splicing regulatory HEXplorer properties that can be concatenated to arbitrary length without changing their regulatory properties. We experimentally validated in silico predictions in a massively parallel splicing reporter assay on more than 3000 sequences and exemplarily identified some SRE binding proteins. Aiming at a unified 'functional splice site strength' encompassing both U1 snRNA complementarity and impact from neighboring SREs, we developed a novel RNA-seq based 5'ss usage landscape, mapping the competition of pairs of high confidence 5'ss and neighboring exonic GT sites along HBond and HEXplorer score coordinate axes on human fibroblast and endothelium transcriptome datasets. These RNA-seq data served as basis for a logistic 5'ss usage prediction model, which greatly improved discrimination between strong but unused exonic GT sites and annotated highly used 5'ss. Our 5'ss usage landscape offers a unified view on 5'ss and SRE neighborhood impact on splice site recognition, and may contribute to improved mutation assessment in human genetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Azlan Nisar
- Institute of Virology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany,Institute for Bioinformatics and Chemoinformatics, Westphalian University of Applied Sciences, August-Schmidt-Ring 10, Recklinghausen 45665, Germany
| | - Jennifer Antemann
- Institute of Virology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany
| | - Ramona Grothmann
- Institute of Virology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany
| | - Frank Hillebrand
- Institute of Virology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany
| | - Anna-Lena Brillen
- Institute of Virology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany
| | - Anastasia Ritchie
- Institute of Virology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany
| | | | - Heiner Schaal
- To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +49 211 81 12393; Fax: +49 211 81 10856;
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
James PA, Fortuno C, Li N, Lim BWX, Campbell IG, Spurdle AB. Estimating the proportion of pathogenic variants from breast cancer case-control data: Application to calibration of ACMG/AMP variant classification criteria. Hum Mutat 2022; 43:882-888. [PMID: 35191126 DOI: 10.1002/humu.24357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
For genes with reliable estimates of disease risk associated with loss-of-function variants, case-control data can be used to estimate the proportion of variants of typical risk effect for defined groups of variants, of relevance for variant classification. A calculation was derived for a maximum likelihood estimate of the proportion of pathogenic variants of typical effect from case-control data and applied to rare variant counts for ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, PALB2, RAD51C, and RAD51D from published breast cancer studies: BEACCON (5770 familial cases and 5741 controls) and breast cancer risk after diagnostic sequencing (60,466 familial and population-based cases and 53,461 controls). There was significant evidence of pathogenic variants among rare noncoding variants, in particular deeper intronic variants, for BRCA1 (13%, p = 8.3 × 10-7 ), BRCA2 (6%, p = 0.016) and PALB2 (13%, p = 0.001). The estimated proportion of pathogenic missense variants varied markedly between genes, generally with enrichment in familial cases, for example, 9% for BRCA2 versus 60%-90% for CHEK2. Stratifying missense variants by position indicated that, for most genes, location within a functional domain significantly predicted pathogenicity, whereas location outside domains provided robust evidence against pathogenicity. Our approach provides novel insights into the spectrum of pathogenic variants of specific breast cancer genes and has wider application to inform gene-focused specifications of American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)/Association of Molecular Pathology (AMP) codes for variant curation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul A James
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Cristina Fortuno
- Genetics and Computational Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Na Li
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Belle W X Lim
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Drug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ian G Campbell
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Amanda B Spurdle
- Genetics and Computational Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Corradi Z, Salameh M, Khan M, Héon E, Mishra K, Hitti-Malin RJ, AlSwaiti Y, Aslanian A, Banin E, Brooks BP, Zein WM, Hufnagel RB, Roosing S, Dhaenens C, Sharon D, Cremers FPM, AlTalbishi A. ABCA4 c.859-25A>G, a Frequent Palestinian Founder Mutation Affecting the Intron 7 Branchpoint, Is Associated With Early-Onset Stargardt Disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2022; 63:20. [PMID: 35475888 PMCID: PMC9055564 DOI: 10.1167/iovs.63.4.20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The effect of noncoding variants is often unknown in the absence of functional assays. Here, we characterized an ABCA4 intron 7 variant, c.859-25A>G, identified in Palestinian probands with Stargardt disease (STGD) or cone-rod dystrophy (CRD). We investigated the effect of this variant on the ABCA4 mRNA and retinal phenotype, and its prevalence in Palestine. Methods The ABCA4 gene was sequenced completely or partially in 1998 cases with STGD or CRD. The effect of c.859-25A>G on splicing was investigated in silico using SpliceAI and in vitro using splice assays. Homozygosity mapping was performed for 16 affected individuals homozygous for c.859-25A>G. The clinical phenotype was assessed using functional and structural analyses including visual acuity, full-field electroretinography, and multimodal imaging. Results The smMIPs-based ABCA4 sequencing revealed c.859-25A>G in 10 Palestinian probands from Hebron and Jerusalem. SpliceAI predicted a significant effect of this putative branchpoint-inactivating variant on the nearby intron 7 splice acceptor site. Splice assays revealed exon 8 skipping and two partial inclusions of intron 7, each having a deleterious effect. Additional genotyping revealed another 46 affected homozygous or compound heterozygous individuals carrying variant c.859-25A>G. Homozygotes shared a genomic segment of 59.6 to 87.9 kb and showed severe retinal defects on ophthalmoscopic evaluation. Conclusions The ABCA4 variant c.859-25A>G disrupts a predicted branchpoint, resulting in protein truncation because of different splice defects, and is associated with early-onset STGD1 when present in homozygosity. This variant was found in 25/525 Palestinian inherited retinal dystrophy probands, representing one of the most frequent inherited retinal disease-causing variants in West-Bank Palestine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zelia Corradi
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Manar Salameh
- St John of Jerusalem Eye Hospital Group, East Jerusalem, Palestine
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Mubeen Khan
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Elise Héon
- Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Program of Genetics and Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ketan Mishra
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rebekkah J. Hitti-Malin
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Yahya AlSwaiti
- St John of Jerusalem Eye Hospital Group, East Jerusalem, Palestine
| | - Alice Aslanian
- St John of Jerusalem Eye Hospital Group, East Jerusalem, Palestine
| | - Eyal Banin
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Brian P. Brooks
- Ophthalmic Genetics and Visual Function Branch, National Eye Institutes, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
| | - Wadih M. Zein
- Ophthalmic Genetics and Visual Function Branch, National Eye Institutes, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
| | - Robert B. Hufnagel
- Ophthalmic Genetics and Visual Function Branch, National Eye Institutes, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States
| | - Susanne Roosing
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Claire‐Marie Dhaenens
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Univ. Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1172 - LilNCog - Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, Lille, France
| | - Dror Sharon
- Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Frans P. M. Cremers
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Alaa AlTalbishi
- St John of Jerusalem Eye Hospital Group, East Jerusalem, Palestine
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Canson DM, Dumenil T, Parsons MT, O'Mara TA, Davidson AL, Okano S, Signal B, Mercer TR, Glubb DM, Spurdle AB. The splicing effect of variants at branchpoint elements in cancer genes. Genet Med 2022; 24:398-409. [PMID: 34906448 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Branchpoint elements are required for intron removal, and variants at these elements can result in aberrant splicing. We aimed to assess the value of branchpoint annotations generated from recent large-scale studies to select branchpoint-abrogating variants, using hereditary cancer genes as model. METHODS We identified branchpoint elements in 119 genes associated with hereditary cancer from 3 genome-wide experimentally-inferred and 2 predicted branchpoint data sets. We then identified variants that occur within branchpoint elements from public databases. We compared conservation, unique variant observations, and population frequencies at different nucleotides within branchpoint motifs. Finally, selected minigene assays were performed to assess the splicing effect of variants at branchpoint elements within mismatch repair genes. RESULTS There was poor overlap between predicted and experimentally-inferred branchpoints. Our analysis of cancer genes suggested that variants at -2 nucleotide, -1 nucleotide, and branchpoint positions in experimentally-inferred canonical motifs are more likely to be clinically relevant. Minigene assay data showed the -2 nucleotide to be more important to branchpoint motif integrity but also showed fluidity in branchpoint usage. CONCLUSION Data from cancer gene analysis suggest that there are few high-risk alleles that severely impact function via branchpoint abrogation. Results of this study inform a general scheme to prioritize branchpoint motif variants for further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daffodil M Canson
- Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Troy Dumenil
- Immunology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michael T Parsons
- Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Tracy A O'Mara
- Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Aimee L Davidson
- Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Satomi Okano
- Statistics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Bethany Signal
- Genomics and Epigenetics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tim R Mercer
- Genomics and Epigenetics, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Australian Institute of Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Dylan M Glubb
- Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Amanda B Spurdle
- Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Keegan NP, Wilton SD, Fletcher S. Analysis of Pathogenic Pseudoexons Reveals Novel Mechanisms Driving Cryptic Splicing. Front Genet 2022; 12:806946. [PMID: 35140743 PMCID: PMC8819188 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.806946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Understanding pre-mRNA splicing is crucial to accurately diagnosing and treating genetic diseases. However, mutations that alter splicing can exert highly diverse effects. Of all the known types of splicing mutations, perhaps the rarest and most difficult to predict are those that activate pseudoexons, sometimes also called cryptic exons. Unlike other splicing mutations that either destroy or redirect existing splice events, pseudoexon mutations appear to create entirely new exons within introns. Since exon definition in vertebrates requires coordinated arrangements of numerous RNA motifs, one might expect that pseudoexons would only arise when rearrangements of intronic DNA create novel exons by chance. Surprisingly, although such mutations do occur, a far more common cause of pseudoexons is deep-intronic single nucleotide variants, raising the question of why these latent exon-like tracts near the mutation sites have not already been purged from the genome by the evolutionary advantage of more efficient splicing. Possible answers may lie in deep intronic splicing processes such as recursive splicing or poison exon splicing. Because these processes utilize intronic motifs that benignly engage with the spliceosome, the regions involved may be more susceptible to exonization than other intronic regions would be. We speculated that a comprehensive study of reported pseudoexons might detect alignments with known deep intronic splice sites and could also permit the characterisation of novel pseudoexon categories. In this report, we present and analyse a catalogue of over 400 published pseudoexon splice events. In addition to confirming prior observations of the most common pseudoexon mutation types, the size of this catalogue also enabled us to suggest new categories for some of the rarer types of pseudoexon mutation. By comparing our catalogue against published datasets of non-canonical splice events, we also found that 15.7% of pseudoexons exhibit some splicing activity at one or both of their splice sites in non-mutant cells. Importantly, this included seven examples of experimentally confirmed recursive splice sites, confirming for the first time a long-suspected link between these two splicing phenomena. These findings have the potential to improve the fidelity of genetic diagnostics and reveal new targets for splice-modulating therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niall P. Keegan
- Centre for Molecular Medicine and Innovative Therapeutics, Health Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia
- Centre for Neuromuscular and Neurological Disorders, Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
- *Correspondence: Niall P. Keegan,
| | - Steve D. Wilton
- Centre for Molecular Medicine and Innovative Therapeutics, Health Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia
- Centre for Neuromuscular and Neurological Disorders, Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Sue Fletcher
- Centre for Molecular Medicine and Innovative Therapeutics, Health Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia
- Centre for Neuromuscular and Neurological Disorders, Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Petersen USS, Doktor TK, Andresen BS. Pseudoexon activation in disease by non-splice site deep intronic sequence variation - wild type pseudoexons constitute high-risk sites in the human genome. Hum Mutat 2021; 43:103-127. [PMID: 34837434 DOI: 10.1002/humu.24306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Accuracy of pre-messenger RNA (pre-mRNA) splicing is crucial for normal gene expression. Complex regulation supports the spliceosomal distinction between authentic exons and the many seemingly functional splice sites delimiting pseudoexons. Pseudoexons are nonfunctional intronic sequences that can be activated for aberrant inclusion in mRNA, which may cause disease. Pseudoexon activation is very challenging to predict, in particular when activation occurs by sequence variants that alter the splicing regulatory environment without directly affecting splice sites. As pseudoexon inclusion often evades detection due to activation of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay, and because conventional diagnostic procedures miss deep intronic sequence variation, pseudoexon activation is a heavily underreported disease mechanism. Pseudoexon characteristics have mainly been studied based on in silico predicted sequences. Moreover, because recognition of sequence variants that create or strengthen splice sites is possible by comparison with well-established consensus sequences, this type of pseudoexon activation is by far the most frequently reported. Here we review all known human disease-associated pseudoexons that carry functional splice sites and are activated by deep intronic sequence variants located outside splice site sequences. We delineate common characteristics that make this type of wild type pseudoexons distinct high-risk sites in the human genome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrika S S Petersen
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and the Villum Center for Bioanalytical Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Thomas K Doktor
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and the Villum Center for Bioanalytical Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark
| | - Brage S Andresen
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and the Villum Center for Bioanalytical Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Keegan NP, Fletcher S. A spotter's guide to SNPtic exons: The common splice variants underlying some SNP-phenotype correlations. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2021; 10:e1840. [PMID: 34708937 PMCID: PMC8801146 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cryptic exons are typically characterised as deleterious splicing aberrations caused by deep intronic mutations. However, low-level splicing of cryptic exons is sometimes observed in the absence of any pathogenic mutation. Five recent reports have described how low-level splicing of cryptic exons can be modulated by common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), resulting in phenotypic differences amongst different genotypes. METHODS We sought to investigate whether additional 'SNPtic' exons may exist, and whether these could provide an explanatory mechanism for some of the genotype-phenotype correlations revealed by genome-wide association studies. We thoroughly searched the literature for reported cryptic exons, cross-referenced their genomic coordinates against the dbSNP database of common SNPs, then screened out SNPs with no reported phenotype associations. RESULTS This method discovered five probable SNPtic exons in the genes APC, FGB, GHRL, MYPBC3 and OTC. For four of these five exons, we observed that the phenotype associated with the SNP was compatible with the predicted splicing effect of the nucleotide change, whilst the fifth (in GHRL) likely had a more complex splice-switching effect. CONCLUSION Application of our search methods could augment the knowledge value of future cryptic exon reports and aid in generating better hypotheses for genome-wide association studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niall Patrick Keegan
- Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.,Centre for Molecular Medicine and Innovative Therapeutics, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Perron Institute, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Sue Fletcher
- Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.,Centre for Molecular Medicine and Innovative Therapeutics, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Riolo G, Cantara S, Ricci C. What's Wrong in a Jump? Prediction and Validation of Splice Site Variants. Methods Protoc 2021; 4:62. [PMID: 34564308 PMCID: PMC8482176 DOI: 10.3390/mps4030062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Revised: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Alternative splicing (AS) is a crucial process to enhance gene expression driving organism development. Interestingly, more than 95% of human genes undergo AS, producing multiple protein isoforms from the same transcript. Any alteration (e.g., nucleotide substitutions, insertions, and deletions) involving consensus splicing regulatory sequences in a specific gene may result in the production of aberrant and not properly working proteins. In this review, we introduce the key steps of splicing mechanism and describe all different types of genomic variants affecting this process (splicing variants in acceptor/donor sites or branch point or polypyrimidine tract, exonic, and deep intronic changes). Then, we provide an updated approach to improve splice variants detection. First, we review the main computational tools, including the recent Machine Learning-based algorithms, for the prediction of splice site variants, in order to characterize how a genomic variant interferes with splicing process. Next, we report the experimental methods to validate the predictive analyses are defined, distinguishing between methods testing RNA (transcriptomics analysis) or proteins (proteomics experiments). For both prediction and validation steps, benefits and weaknesses of each tool/procedure are accurately reported, as well as suggestions on which approaches are more suitable in diagnostic rather than in clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Claudia Ricci
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Neurological Sciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy; (G.R.); (S.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Moles-Fernández A, Domènech-Vivó J, Tenés A, Balmaña J, Diez O, Gutiérrez-Enríquez S. Role of Splicing Regulatory Elements and In Silico Tools Usage in the Identification of Deep Intronic Splicing Variants in Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer Genes. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13133341. [PMID: 34283047 PMCID: PMC8268271 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13133341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary There is a significant percentage of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) cases that remain undiagnosed, because no pathogenic variant is detected through massively parallel sequencing of coding exons and exon-intron boundaries of high-moderate susceptibility risk genes. Deep intronic regions may contain variants affecting RNA splicing, leading ultimately to disease, and hence they may explain several cases where the genetic cause of HBOC is unknown. This study aims to characterize intronic regions to identify a landscape of “exonizable” zones and test the efficiency of two in silico tools to detect deep intronic variants affecting the mRNA splicing process. Abstract The contribution of deep intronic splice-altering variants to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) is unknown. Current computational in silico tools to predict spliceogenic variants leading to pseudoexons have limited efficiency. We assessed the performance of the SpliceAI tool combined with ESRseq scores to identify spliceogenic deep intronic variants by affecting cryptic sites or splicing regulatory elements (SREs) using literature and experimental datasets. Our results with 233 published deep intronic variants showed that SpliceAI, with a 0.05 threshold, predicts spliceogenic deep intronic variants affecting cryptic splice sites, but is less effective in detecting those affecting SREs. Next, we characterized the SRE profiles using ESRseq, showing that pseudoexons are significantly enriched in SRE-enhancers compared to adjacent intronic regions. Although the combination of SpliceAI with ESRseq scores (considering ∆ESRseq and SRE landscape) showed higher sensitivity, the global performance did not improve because of the higher number of false positives. The combination of both tools was tested in a tumor RNA dataset with 207 intronic variants disrupting splicing, showing a sensitivity of 86%. Following the pipeline, five spliceogenic deep intronic variants were experimentally identified from 33 variants in HBOC genes. Overall, our results provide a framework to detect deep intronic variants disrupting splicing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Moles-Fernández
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (A.M.-F.); (J.D.-V.); (J.B.)
| | - Joanna Domènech-Vivó
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (A.M.-F.); (J.D.-V.); (J.B.)
| | - Anna Tenés
- Area of Clinical and Molecular Genetics, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, 08035 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Judith Balmaña
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (A.M.-F.); (J.D.-V.); (J.B.)
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Orland Diez
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (A.M.-F.); (J.D.-V.); (J.B.)
- Area of Clinical and Molecular Genetics, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, 08035 Barcelona, Spain;
- Correspondence: (O.D.); (S.G.-E.)
| | - Sara Gutiérrez-Enríquez
- Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (A.M.-F.); (J.D.-V.); (J.B.)
- Correspondence: (O.D.); (S.G.-E.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bueno-Martínez E, Sanoguera-Miralles L, Valenzuela-Palomo A, Lorca V, Gómez-Sanz A, Carvalho S, Allen J, Infante M, Pérez-Segura P, Lázaro C, Easton DF, Devilee P, Vreeswijk MPG, de la Hoya M, Velasco EA. RAD51D Aberrant Splicing in Breast Cancer: Identification of Splicing Regulatory Elements and Minigene-Based Evaluation of 53 DNA Variants. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:2845. [PMID: 34200360 PMCID: PMC8201001 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
RAD51D loss-of-function variants increase lifetime risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Splicing disruption is a frequent pathogenic mechanism associated with variants in susceptibility genes. Herein, we have assessed the splicing and clinical impact of splice-site and exonic splicing enhancer (ESE) variants identified through the study of ~113,000 women of the BRIDGES cohort. A RAD51D minigene with exons 2-9 was constructed in splicing vector pSAD. Eleven BRIDGES splice-site variants (selected by MaxEntScan) were introduced into the minigene by site-directed mutagenesis and tested in MCF-7 cells. The 11 variants disrupted splicing, collectively generating 25 different aberrant transcripts. All variants but one produced negligible levels (<3.4%) of the full-length (FL) transcript. In addition, ESE elements of the alternative exon 3 were mapped by testing four overlapping exonic microdeletions (≥30-bp), revealing an ESE-rich interval (c.202_235del) with critical sequences for exon 3 recognition that might have been affected by germline variants. Next, 26 BRIDGES variants and 16 artificial exon 3 single-nucleotide substitutions were also assayed. Thirty variants impaired splicing with variable amounts (0-65.1%) of the FL transcript, although only c.202G>A demonstrated a complete aberrant splicing pattern without the FL transcript. On the other hand, c.214T>C increased efficiency of exon 3 recognition, so only the FL transcript was detected (100%). In conclusion, 41 RAD51D spliceogenic variants (28 of which were from the BRIDGES cohort) were identified by minigene assays. We show that minigene-based mapping of ESEs is a powerful approach for identifying ESE hotspots and ESE-disrupting variants. Finally, we have classified nine variants as likely pathogenic according to ACMG/AMP-based guidelines, highlighting the complex relationship between splicing alterations and variant interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Bueno-Martínez
- Splicing and Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer Laboratory, Unidad de Excelencia Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC-UVa), 47003 Valladolid, Spain; (E.B.-M.); (L.S.-M.); (A.V.-P.)
| | - Lara Sanoguera-Miralles
- Splicing and Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer Laboratory, Unidad de Excelencia Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC-UVa), 47003 Valladolid, Spain; (E.B.-M.); (L.S.-M.); (A.V.-P.)
| | - Alberto Valenzuela-Palomo
- Splicing and Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer Laboratory, Unidad de Excelencia Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC-UVa), 47003 Valladolid, Spain; (E.B.-M.); (L.S.-M.); (A.V.-P.)
| | - Víctor Lorca
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory CIBERONC, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Hospital Clinico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain; (V.L.); (A.G.-S.); (P.P.-S.)
| | - Alicia Gómez-Sanz
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory CIBERONC, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Hospital Clinico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain; (V.L.); (A.G.-S.); (P.P.-S.)
| | - Sara Carvalho
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK; (S.C.); (J.A.); (D.F.E.)
| | - Jamie Allen
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK; (S.C.); (J.A.); (D.F.E.)
| | - Mar Infante
- Cancer Genetics, Unidad de Excelencia Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular (CSIC-UVa), 47003 Valladolid, Spain;
| | - Pedro Pérez-Segura
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory CIBERONC, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Hospital Clinico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain; (V.L.); (A.G.-S.); (P.P.-S.)
| | - Conxi Lázaro
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL and CIBERONC, 08908 Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain;
| | - Douglas F. Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK; (S.C.); (J.A.); (D.F.E.)
| | - Peter Devilee
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands; (P.D.); (M.P.G.V.)
| | - Maaike P. G. Vreeswijk
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands; (P.D.); (M.P.G.V.)
| | - Miguel de la Hoya
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory CIBERONC, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Hospital Clinico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain; (V.L.); (A.G.-S.); (P.P.-S.)
| | - Eladio A. Velasco
- Splicing and Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer Laboratory, Unidad de Excelencia Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC-UVa), 47003 Valladolid, Spain; (E.B.-M.); (L.S.-M.); (A.V.-P.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sanoguera-Miralles L, Valenzuela-Palomo A, Bueno-Martínez E, Llovet P, Díez-Gómez B, Caloca MJ, Pérez-Segura P, Fraile-Bethencourt E, Colmena M, Carvalho S, Allen J, Easton DF, Devilee P, Vreeswijk MPG, de la Hoya M, Velasco EA. Comprehensive Functional Characterization and Clinical Interpretation of 20 Splice-Site Variants of the RAD51C Gene. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E3771. [PMID: 33333735 PMCID: PMC7765170 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12123771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease with more than 10 known disease-associated genes. In the framework of the BRIDGES project (Breast Cancer Risk after Diagnostic Gene Sequencing), the RAD51C gene has been sequenced in 60,466 breast cancer patients and 53,461 controls. We aimed at functionally characterizing all the identified genetic variants that are predicted to disrupt the splicing process. Forty RAD51C variants of the intron-exon boundaries were bioinformatically analyzed, 20 of which were selected for splicing functional assays. To test them, a splicing reporter minigene with exons 2 to 8 was designed and constructed. This minigene generated a full-length transcript of the expected size (1062 nucleotides), sequence, and structure (Vector exon V1- RAD51C exons_2-8- Vector exon V2). The 20 candidate variants were genetically engineered into the wild type minigene and functionally assayed in MCF-7 cells. Nineteen variants (95%) impaired splicing, while 18 of them produced severe splicing anomalies. At least 35 transcripts were generated by the mutant minigenes: 16 protein-truncating, 6 in-frame, and 13 minor uncharacterized isoforms. According to ACMG/AMP-based standards, 15 variants could be classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants: c.404G > A, c.405-6T > A, c.571 + 4A > G, c.571 + 5G > A, c.572-1G > T, c.705G > T, c.706-2A > C, c.706-2A > G, c.837 + 2T > C, c.905-3C > G, c.905-2A > C, c.905-2_905-1del, c.965 + 5G > A, c.1026 + 5_1026 + 7del, and c.1026 + 5G > T.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Sanoguera-Miralles
- Splicing and Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer, Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC-UVa), 47003 Valladolid, Spain; (L.S.-M.); (A.V.-P.); (E.B.-M.); (B.D.-G.); (E.F.-B.)
| | - Alberto Valenzuela-Palomo
- Splicing and Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer, Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC-UVa), 47003 Valladolid, Spain; (L.S.-M.); (A.V.-P.); (E.B.-M.); (B.D.-G.); (E.F.-B.)
| | - Elena Bueno-Martínez
- Splicing and Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer, Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC-UVa), 47003 Valladolid, Spain; (L.S.-M.); (A.V.-P.); (E.B.-M.); (B.D.-G.); (E.F.-B.)
| | - Patricia Llovet
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), 28040 Madrid, Spain; (P.L.); (P.P.-S.); (M.C.)
| | - Beatriz Díez-Gómez
- Splicing and Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer, Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC-UVa), 47003 Valladolid, Spain; (L.S.-M.); (A.V.-P.); (E.B.-M.); (B.D.-G.); (E.F.-B.)
| | - María José Caloca
- Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC-UVa), 47003 Valladolid, Spain;
| | - Pedro Pérez-Segura
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), 28040 Madrid, Spain; (P.L.); (P.P.-S.); (M.C.)
| | - Eugenia Fraile-Bethencourt
- Splicing and Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer, Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC-UVa), 47003 Valladolid, Spain; (L.S.-M.); (A.V.-P.); (E.B.-M.); (B.D.-G.); (E.F.-B.)
- Knight Cancer Research Building, 2720 S Moody Ave, Portland, OR 97201, USA
| | - Marta Colmena
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), 28040 Madrid, Spain; (P.L.); (P.P.-S.); (M.C.)
| | - Sara Carvalho
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK; (S.C.); (J.A.); (D.F.E.)
| | - Jamie Allen
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK; (S.C.); (J.A.); (D.F.E.)
| | - Douglas F. Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK; (S.C.); (J.A.); (D.F.E.)
| | - Peter Devilee
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Human Genetics, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands; (P.D.); (M.P.G.V.)
| | - Maaike P. G. Vreeswijk
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Human Genetics, 2300RC Leiden, The Netherlands; (P.D.); (M.P.G.V.)
| | - Miguel de la Hoya
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), 28040 Madrid, Spain; (P.L.); (P.P.-S.); (M.C.)
| | - Eladio A. Velasco
- Splicing and Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer, Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC-UVa), 47003 Valladolid, Spain; (L.S.-M.); (A.V.-P.); (E.B.-M.); (B.D.-G.); (E.F.-B.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Backers L, Parton B, De Bruyne M, Tavernier SJ, Van Den Bogaert K, Lambrecht BN, Haerynck F, Claes KBM. Missing heritability in Bloom syndrome: First report of a deep intronic variant leading to pseudo-exon activation in the BLM gene. Clin Genet 2020; 99:292-297. [PMID: 33073370 DOI: 10.1111/cge.13859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Revised: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Pathogenic biallelic variants in the BLM/RECQL3 gene cause a rare autosomal recessive disorder called Bloom syndrome (BS). This syndrome is characterized by severe growth delay, immunodeficiency, dermatological manifestations and a predisposition to a wide variety of cancers, often multiple and very early in life. Literature shows that the main mode of BLM inactivation is protein translation termination. We expanded the molecular spectrum of BS by reporting the first deep intronic variant causing intron exonisation. We describe a patient with a clinical phenotype of BS and a strong increase in sister chromatid exchanges (SCE), who was found to be compound heterozygous for a novel nonsense variant c.3379C>T, p.(Gln1127Ter) in exon 18 and a deep intronic variant c.3020-258A>G in intron 15 of the BLM gene. The deep intronic variant creates a high-quality de novo donor splice site, which leads to retention of two intron segments. Both pseudo-exons introduce a premature stop codon into the reading frame and abolish BLM protein expression, confirmed by Western Blot analysis. These findings illustrate the role of non-coding variation in Mendelian disorders and herewith highlight an unmet need in routine testing of Mendelian disorders, being the added value of RNA-based approaches to provide a complete molecular diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn Backers
- Center for Medical Genetics, Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University and Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.,Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Bram Parton
- Center for Medical Genetics, Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University and Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.,Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Marieke De Bruyne
- Center for Medical Genetics, Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University and Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Simon J Tavernier
- Unit of Molecular Signal Transduction in Inflammation, VIB-UGent Center for Inflammation Research, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kris Van Den Bogaert
- Center for Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven - Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bart N Lambrecht
- Unit of Immunoregulation and Mucosal Immunology, VIB-UGent Center for Inflammation Research, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Filomeen Haerynck
- Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kathleen B M Claes
- Center for Medical Genetics, Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University and Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.,Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|