MGMT CpG island is invariably methylated in adult astrocytic and oligodendroglial tumors with IDH1 or IDH2 mutations

Glioma: bridging the tumor microenvironment, patient immune profiles and novel personalized immunotherapy

Glioma is the most common primary brain tumor, characterized by a consistently high patient mortality rate and a dismal prognosis affecting both survival and quality of life. Substantial evidence underscores the vital role of the immune system in eradicating tumors effectively and preventing metastasis, underscoring the importance of cancer immunotherapy which could potentially address the challenges in glioma therapy. Although glioma immunotherapies have shown promise in preclinical and early-phase clinical trials, they face specific limitations and challenges that have hindered their success in further phase III trials. Resistance to therapy has been a major challenge across many experimental approaches, and as of now, no immunotherapies have been approved. In addition, there are several other limitations facing glioma immunotherapy in clinical trials, such as high intra- and inter-tumoral heterogeneity, an inherently immunosuppressive microenvironment, the unique tissue-specific interactions between the central nervous system and the peripheral immune system, the existence of the blood-brain barrier, which is a physical barrier to drug delivery, and the immunosuppressive effects of standard therapy. Therefore, in this review, we delve into several challenges that need to be addressed to achieve boosted immunotherapy against gliomas. First, we discuss the hurdles posed by the glioma microenvironment, particularly its primary cellular inhabitants, in particular tumor-associated microglia and macrophages (TAMs), and myeloid cells, which represent a significant barrier to effective immunotherapy. Here we emphasize the impact of inducing immunogenic cell death (ICD) on the migration of Th17 cells into the tumor microenvironment, converting it into an immunologically "hot" environment and enhancing the effectiveness of ongoing immunotherapy. Next, we address the challenge associated with the accurate identification and characterization of the primary immune profiles of gliomas, and their implications for patient prognosis, which can facilitate the selection of personalized treatment regimens and predict the patient's response to immunotherapy. Finally, we explore a prospective approach to developing highly personalized vaccination strategies against gliomas, based on the search for patient-specific neoantigens. All the pertinent challenges discussed in this review will serve as a compass for future developments in immunotherapeutic strategies against gliomas, paving the way for upcoming preclinical and clinical research endeavors.

Liquid biopsy: creating opportunities in brain space

In recent years, liquid biopsy has emerged as an alternative method to diagnose and monitor tumors. Compared to classical tissue biopsy procedures, liquid biopsy facilitates the repetitive collection of diverse cellular and acellular analytes from various biofluids in a non/minimally invasive manner. This strategy is of greater significance for high-grade brain malignancies such as glioblastoma as the quantity and accessibility of tumors are limited, and there are collateral risks of compromised life quality coupled with surgical interventions. Currently, blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are the most common biofluids used to collect circulating cells and biomolecules of tumor origin. These liquid biopsy analytes have created opportunities for real-time investigations of distinct genetic, epigenetic, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics alterations associated with brain tumors. This review describes different classes of liquid biopsy biomarkers present in the biofluids of brain tumor patients. Moreover, an overview of the liquid biopsy applications, challenges, recent technological advances, and clinical trials in the brain have also been provided.

A qPCR technology for direct quantification of methylation in untreated DNA

DNA methylation is important for gene expression and alterations in DNA methylation are involved in the development and progression of cancer and other major diseases. Analysis of DNA methylation patterns has until now been dependent on either a chemical or an enzymatic pre-treatment, which are both time consuming procedures and potentially biased due to incomplete treatment. We present a qPCR technology, EpiDirect®, that allows for direct PCR quantification of DNA methylations using untreated DNA. EpiDirect® is based on the ability of Intercalating Nucleic Acids (INA®) to differentiate between methylated and unmethylated cytosines in a special primer design. With this technology, we develop an assay to analyze the methylation status of a region of the MGMT promoter used in treatment selection and prognosis of glioblastoma patients. We compare the assay to two bisulfite-relying, methyl-specific PCR assays in a study involving 42 brain tumor FFPE samples, revealing high sensitivity, specificity, and the clinical utility of the method.

DNA damage in IDH-mutant gliomas: mechanisms and clinical implications

PURPOSE

Since the discovery of IDH mutations in glioma over a decade ago, significant progress has been made in determining how these mutations affect epigenetic, transcriptomic, and metabolic programs in brain tumor cells. In this article, we summarize current understanding of how IDH mutations influence DNA damage in glioma and discuss clinical implications of these findings.

METHODS

We performed a thorough review of peer-reviewed publications and provide an overview of key mechanisms by which IDH mutations impact response to DNA damage in gliomas, with an emphasis on clinical implications.

RESULTS

The effects of mutant IDH on DNA damage largely fall into four overarching categories: Gene Expression, Sensitivity to Alkylating Agents, Homologous Recombination, and Oxidative Stress. From a mechanistic standpoint, we discuss how mutant IDH and the oncometabolite (R)-2HG affect each of these categories of DNA damage. We also contextualize these mechanisms with respect to ongoing clinical trials. Studies are underway that incorporate current standard-of-care therapies, including radiation and alkylating agents, in addition to novel therapeutic agents that exert genotoxic stress specifically in IDH-mutant gliomas. Lastly, we discuss key unanswered questions and emerging data in this field that have important implications for our understanding of glioma biology and for the development of new brain tumor therapies.

CONCLUSION

Mounting preclinical and clinical data suggest that IDH mutations alter DNA damage sensing and repair pathways through distinct mechanisms. Future studies are needed to deepen our understanding of these processes and provide additional mechanistic insights that can be leveraged for therapeutic benefit.

Challenges and opportunities for advanced neuroimaging of glioblastoma

Glioblastoma is the most aggressive of glial tumours in adults. On conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, these tumours are observed as irregular enhancing lesions with areas of infiltrating tumour and cortical expansion. More advanced imaging techniques including diffusion-weighted MRI, perfusion-weighted MRI, MR spectroscopy and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging have found widespread application to diagnostic challenges in the setting of first diagnosis, treatment planning and follow-up. This review aims to educate readers with regard to the strengths and weaknesses of the clinical application of these imaging techniques. For example, this review shows that the (semi)quantitative analysis of the mentioned advanced imaging tools was found useful for assessing tumour aggressiveness and tumour extent, and aids in the differentiation of tumour progression from treatment-related effects. Although these techniques may aid in the diagnostic work-up and (post-)treatment phase of glioblastoma, so far no unequivocal imaging strategy is available. Furthermore, the use and further development of artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools could greatly enhance neuroradiological practice by automating labour-intensive tasks such as tumour measurements, and by providing additional diagnostic information such as prediction of tumour genotype. Nevertheless, due to the fact that advanced imaging and AI-diagnostics is not part of response assessment criteria, there is no harmonised guidance on their use, while at the same time the lack of standardisation severely hampers the definition of uniform guidelines.

Early repeat resection for residual glioblastoma: decision-making among an international cohort of neurosurgeons

OBJECTIVE

The importance of extent of resection (EOR) in glioblastoma (GBM) has been thoroughly demonstrated. However, few studies have explored the practices and benefits of early repeat resection (ERR) when residual tumor deemed resectable is unintentionally left after an initial resection, and the survival benefit of ERR is still unknown. Herein, the authors aimed to internationally survey current practices regarding ERR and to analyze differences based on geographic location and practice setting.

METHODS

The authors distributed a survey to the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and Congress of Neurological Surgeons Tumor Section, Society of British Neurological Surgeons, European Association of Neurosurgical Society, and Latin American Federation of Neurosurgical Societies. Neurosurgeons responded to questions about their training, practice setting, and current ERR practices. They also reported the EOR threshold below which they would pursue ERR and their likelihood of performing ERR using a Likert scale of 1-5 (5 being the most likely) in two sets of 5 cases, the first set for a patient's initial hospitalization and the second for a referred patient who had undergone resection elsewhere. The resection likelihood index for each respondent was calculated as the mean Likert score across all cases.

RESULTS

Overall, 180 neurosurgeons from 25 countries responded to the survey. Neurosurgeons performed ERRs very rarely in their practices (< 1% of all GBM cases), with an EOR threshold of 80.2% (75%-95%). When presented with 10 cases, the case context (initial hospitalization vs referred patient) did not significantly change the surgeon ERR likelihood, although ERR likelihood did vary significantly on the basis of tumor location (p < 0.0001). Latin American neurosurgeons were more likely to pursue ERR in the provided cases. Neurosurgeons were more likely to pursue ERR when the tumor was MGMT methylated versus unmethylated, with a resection likelihood index of 3.78 and 3.21, respectively (p = 0.004); however, there was no significant difference between IDH mutant and IDH wild-type tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this survey reveal current practices regarding ERR, but they also demonstrate the variability in how neurosurgeons approach ERR. Standardized guidelines based on future studies incorporating tumor molecular characteristics are needed to guide neurosurgeons in their decision-making on this complicated issue.

Randomized phase III study of high-dose methotrexate and whole-brain radiotherapy with/without temozolomide for newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma: JCOG1114C

BACKGROUND

The goal was to determine whether the addition of temozolomide (TMZ) to the standard treatment of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) and whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) improves survival.

METHODS

An open-label, randomized, phase III trial was conducted in Japan, enrolling immunocompetent patients aged 20-70 years with histologically confirmed, newly diagnosed PCNSL. After administration of HD-MTX, patients were randomly assigned to receive WBRT (30 Gy) ± 10 Gy boost (arm A) or WBRT ± boost with concomitant and maintenance TMZ for two years (arm B). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Between September 29, 2014 and October 15, 2018, 134 patients were enrolled, of whom 122 were randomly assigned and analyzed. At the planned interim analysis, two-year OS was 86.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 72.5-94.0%) in arm A and 71.4% (56.0-82.2%) in arm B. The hazard ratio was 2.18 (95% CI: 0.95 to 4.98), with the predicted probability of showing the superiority of arm B at the final analysis estimated to be 1.3%. The study was terminated early due to futility. O 6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status was measured in 115 tumors, and it was neither prognostic nor predictive of TMZ response.

CONCLUSIONS

This study failed to demonstrate the benefit of concomitant and maintenance TMZ in newly diagnosed PCNSL.

Volumetric Analysis of Glioblastoma for Determining Which CpG Sites Should Be Tested by Pyrosequencing to Predict Temozolomide Efficacy

The aim of the present study was to determine which individual or combined CpG sites among O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase CpG 74–89 in glioblastoma mainly affects the response to temozolomide resulting from CpG methylation using statistical analyses focused on the tumor volume ratio (TVR). We retrospectively examined 44 patients who had postoperative volumetrically measurable residual tumor tissue and received adjuvant temozolomide therapy for at least 6 months after initial chemoradiotherapy. TVR was defined as the tumor volume 6 months after the initial chemoradiotherapy divided by that before the start of chemoradiotherapy. Predictive values for TVR as a response to adjuvant therapy were compared among the averaged methylation percentages of individual or combined CpGs using the receiver operating characteristic curve. Our data revealed that combined CpG 78 and 79 showed a high area under the curve (AUC) and a positive likelihood ratio and that combined CpG 76–79 showed the highest AUC among all combinations. AUCs of consecutive CpG combinations tended to be higher for CpG 74–82 in exon 1 than for CpG 83–89 in intron 1. In conclusion, the methylation status at CpG sites in exon 1 was strongly associated with TVR reduction in glioblastoma.

Definition of the Prognostic Role of MGMT Promoter Methylation Value by Pyrosequencing in Newly Diagnosed IDH Wild-Type Glioblastoma Patients Treated with Radiochemotherapy: A Large Multicenter Study

Background. O6-methylguanine (O6-MeG)-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status is a predictive factor for alkylating treatment efficacy in glioblastoma patients, but its prognostic role is still unclear. We performed a large, multicenter study to evaluate the association between MGMT methylation value and survival. Methods. We evaluated glioblastoma patients with an assessment of MGMT methylation status by pyrosequencing from nine Italian centers. The inclusion criteria were histological diagnosis of IDH wild-type glioblastoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) ≤2, and radio-chemotherapy treatment with temozolomide. The relationship between OS and MGMT was investigated with a time-dependent Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve and Cox regression models. Results. In total, 591 newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients were analyzed. The median OS was 16.2 months. The ROC analysis suggested a cut-off of 15% for MGMT methylation. The 2-year Overall Survival (OS) was 18.3% and 51.8% for MGMT methylation <15% and ≥15% (p < 0.0001). In the multivariable analysis, MGMT methylation <15% was associated with impaired survival (p < 0.00001). However, we also found a non-linear association between MGMT methylation and OS (p = 0.002): median OS was 14.8 months for MGMT in 0−4%, 18.9 months for MGMT in 4−40%, and 29.9 months for MGMT in 40−100%. Conclusions. Our findings suggested a non-linear relationship between OS and MGMT promoter methylation, which implies a varying magnitude of prognostic effect across values of MGMT promoter methylation by pyrosequencing in newly diagnosed IDH wild-type glioblastoma patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Molecular Biomarker Testing for the Diagnosis of Diffuse Gliomas

CONTEXT.—

The diagnosis and clinical management of patients with diffuse gliomas (DGs) have evolved rapidly over the past decade with the emergence of molecular biomarkers that are used to classify, stratify risk, and predict treatment response for optimal clinical care.

OBJECTIVE.—

To develop evidence-based recommendations for informing molecular biomarker testing for pediatric and adult patients with DGs and provide guidance for appropriate laboratory test and biomarker selection for optimal diagnosis, risk stratification, and prediction.

DESIGN.—

The College of American Pathologists convened an expert panel to perform a systematic review of the literature and develop recommendations. A systematic review of literature was conducted to address the overarching question, "What ancillary tests are needed to classify DGs and sufficiently inform the clinical management of patients?" Recommendations were derived from quality of evidence, open comment feedback, and expert panel consensus.

RESULTS.—

Thirteen recommendations and 3 good practice statements were established to guide pathologists and treating physicians on the most appropriate methods and molecular biomarkers to include in laboratory testing to inform clinical management of patients with DGs.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Evidence-based incorporation of laboratory results from molecular biomarker testing into integrated diagnoses of DGs provides reproducible and clinically meaningful information for patient management.

MGMT gene promoter methylation by pyrosequencing method correlates volumetric response and neurological status in IDH wild-type glioblastomas

Purpose

Although the usefulness of O⁶-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation analysis for predicting response to chemoradiotherapy and the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma has been widely reported, there is still no consensus regarding how to define MGMT promoter methylation percentage (MGMTpm%) cutoffs by pyrosequencing method. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal cutoff value of MGMT promoter methylation status using volumetric analysis focused on the tumor volume ratio (TVR) measured by MRI.

Methods

This retrospective study included newly diagnosed IDH wild-type glioblastoma patients with residual tumor after surgery, followed by local radiotherapy with temozolomide. TVR was defined as the tumor volume at 6 months after the initial chemoradiotherapy administration divided by the tumor volume before the start of therapy. The mean MGMTpm% of 16 CpG islands (74–89) was analyzed using pyrosequencing. We statistically analyzed the correlation between MGMTpm%, TVR, and change in Karnofsky performance status.

Results

The study included 44 patients with residual tumors. Thirteen (92.9%) of 14 patients with MGMTpm% ≥ 23.9% showed 50% or more volumetric response, leading to prolonged survival, and 17 (70.8%) of 24 patients with MGMTpm% < 8.2% had progressive disease after initial chemoradiotherapy administration. Three (50.0%) of six patients with MGMTpm% 8.2% to < 23.9% had stable disease or partial response.

Conclusion

Evaluation of MGMTpm% by pyrosequencing is important in predicting the volumetric response and prognosis of glioblastoma patients with residual tumors.

Oncometabolites as Regulators of DNA Damage Response and Repair

Dysregulation of DNA damage response and repair (DDR) contributes to oncogenesis, yet also generates the potential for targeted cancer therapies by exploiting synthetic lethal interactions. Oncometabolites, small intermediates of metabolism overproduced in certain cancers, have emerged as a new mechanism of DDR modulation through their effects on multiple DNA repair pathways. Increasing evidence suggests that oncometabolite-induced DDR defects may offer the opportunity for tumor-selective chemo- and radio-sensitization. Here we review the biology of oncometabolites and diverse mechanisms by which they impact DDR, with a focus on emerging therapeutic strategies and ongoing clinical trials targeting oncometabolite-induced DDR defects in cancer.

TERT promoter mutation status is necessary and sufficient to diagnose IDH-wildtype diffuse astrocytic glioma with molecular features of glioblastoma

The Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to CNS Tumor Taxonomy (cIMPACT-NOW) update 3 recommends that histologic grade II and III IDH-wildtype diffuse astrocytic gliomas that harbor EGFR amplification, the combination of whole chromosome 7 gain and whole chromosome 10 loss (7 + /10 -), or TERT promoter (pTERT) mutations should be considered as glioblastomas (GBM), World Health Organization grade IV. In this retrospective study, we examined the utility of molecular classification based on pTERT status and copy-number alterations (CNAs) in IDH-wildtype lower grade gliomas (LGGs, grade II, and III). The impact on survival was evaluated for the pTERT mutation and CNAs, including EGFR gain/amplification, PTEN loss, CDKN2A homozygous deletion, and PDGFRA gain/amplification. We analyzed 46 patients with IDH-wildtype/pTERT-mutant (mut) LGGs and 85 with IDH-wildtype/pTERT-wildtype LGGs. EGFR amplification and a combination of EGFR gain and PTEN loss (EGFR + /PTEN -) were significantly more frequent in pTERT-mut patients (p < 0.0001). Cox regression analysis showed that the pTERT mutation was a significant predictor of poor prognosis (hazard ratio [HR] 2.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.55-4.89, p = 0.0008), but neither EGFR amplification nor EGFR + /PTEN - was an independent prognostic factor in IDH-wildtype LGGs. PDGFRA gain/amplification was a significant poor prognostic factor in IDH-wildtype/pTERT-wildtype LGGs (HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.09-5.27, p = 0.03, Cox regression analysis). The IDH-wildtype LGGs with either pTERT-mut or PDGFRA amplification were mostly clustered with GBM by DNA methylation analysis. Thus, our study suggests that analysis of pTERT mutation status is necessary and sufficient to diagnose IDH-wildtype diffuse astrocytic gliomas with molecular features of glioblastoma. The PDGFRA status may help further delineate IDH-wildtype/pTERT-wildtype LGGs. Methylation profiling showed that IDH-wildtype LGGs without molecular features of GBM were a heterogeneous group of tumors. Some of them did not fall into existing categories and had significantly better prognoses than those clustered with GBM.

Combining MGMT promoter pyrosequencing and protein expression to optimize prognosis stratification in glioblastoma

Pyrosequencing (PSQ) represents the golden standard for MGMT promoter status determination. Binary interpretation of results based on the threshold from the average of several CpGs tested would neglect the existence of the “gray zone”. How to define the gray zone and reclassify patients in this subgroup remains to be elucidated. A consecutive cohort of 312 primary glioblastoma patients were enrolled. CpGs 74‐81 in the promoter region of MGMT were tested by PSQ and the protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to calculate the area under the curves (AUC). Kaplan‐Meier plots were used to estimate the survival rate of patients compared by the log‐rank test. The optimal threshold of each individual CpG differed from 5% to 11%. Patients could be separated into the hypomethylated subgroup (all CpGs tested below the corresponding optimal thresholds, n = 126, 40.4%), hypermethylated subgroup (all CpGs tested above the corresponding optimal thresholds, n = 108, 34.6%), and the gray zone subgroup (remaining patients, n = 78, 25.0%). Patients in the gray zone harbored an intermediate prognosis. The IHC score instead of the average methylation levels could successfully predict the prognosis for the gray zone (AUC for overall survival, 0.653 and 0.519, respectively). Combining PSQ and IHC significantly improved the efficiency of survival prediction (AUC: 0.662, 0.648, and 0.720 for PSQ, IHC, and combined, respectively). Immunohistochemistry is a robust method to predict prognosis for patients in the gray zone defined by PSQ. Combining PSQ and IHC could significantly improve the predictive ability for clinical outcomes.

Adjuvant and concurrent temozolomide for 1p/19q non-co-deleted anaplastic glioma (CATNON; EORTC study 26053-22054): second interim analysis of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

The CATNON trial investigated the addition of concurrent, adjuvant, and both current and adjuvant temozolomide to radiotherapy in adults with newly diagnosed 1p/19q non-co-deleted anaplastic gliomas. The benefit of concurrent temozolomide chemotherapy and relevance of mutations in the IDH1 and IDH2 genes remain unclear.

METHODS

This randomised, open-label, phase 3 study done in 137 institutions across Australia, Europe, and North America included patients aged 18 years or older with newly diagnosed 1p/19q non-co-deleted anaplastic gliomas and a WHO performance status of 0-2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) centrally using a minimisation technique to radiotherapy alone (59·4 Gy in 33 fractions; three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy or intensity-modulated radiotherapy), radiotherapy with concurrent oral temozolomide (75 mg/m2 per day), radiotherapy with adjuvant oral temozolomide (12 4-week cycles of 150-200 mg/m2 temozolomide given on days 1-5), or radiotherapy with both concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. Patients were stratified by institution, WHO performance status score, age, 1p loss of heterozygosity, the presence of oligodendroglial elements on microscopy, and MGMT promoter methylation status. The primary endpoint was overall survival adjusted by stratification factors at randomisation in the intention-to-treat population. A second interim analysis requested by the independent data monitoring committee was planned when two-thirds of total required events were observed to test superiority or futility of concurrent temozolomide. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00626990.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 4, 2007, and Sept 11, 2015, 751 patients were randomly assigned (189 to radiotherapy alone, 188 to radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide, 186 to radiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide, and 188 to radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide). Median follow-up was 55·7 months (IQR 41·0-77·3). The second interim analysis declared futility of concurrent temozolomide (median overall survival was 66·9 months [95% CI 45·7-82·3] with concurrent temozolomide vs 60·4 months [45·7-71·5] without concurrent temozolomide; hazard ratio [HR] 0·97 [99·1% CI 0·73-1·28], p=0·76). By contrast, adjuvant temozolomide improved overall survival compared with no adjuvant temozolomide (median overall survival 82·3 months [95% CI 67·2-116·6] vs 46·9 months [37·9-56·9]; HR 0·64 [95% CI 0·52-0·79], p<0·0001). The most frequent grade 3 and 4 toxicities were haematological, occurring in no patients in the radiotherapy only group, 16 (9%) of 185 patients in the concurrent temozolomide group, and 55 (15%) of 368 patients in both groups with adjuvant temozolomide. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

INTERPRETATION

Adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy, but not concurrent temozolomide chemotherapy, was associated with a survival benefit in patients with 1p/19q non-co-deleted anaplastic glioma. Clinical benefit was dependent on IDH1 and IDH2 mutational status.

FUNDING

Merck Sharpe & Dohme.

Predictive value of MGMT promoter methylation on the survival of TMZ treated IDH-mutant glioblastoma

Objective

O6methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation is a biomarker widely used to predict the sensitivity of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma to temozolomide therapy. Given that the IDH status has critical effects on the survival and epigenetic features of glioblastoma, we aimed to assess the role of MGMT promoter methylation in IDH-mutant glioblastoma.

Methods

This study included 187 IDH-mutant glioblastomas and used 173 IDH-wildtype glioblastomas for comparison. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression were used to study the predictive effects.

Results

Compared with IDH-wildtype glioblastomas, IDH-mutant glioblastomas showed significantly higher (P < 0.0001) MGMT promoter methylation. We demonstrated that MGMT promoter methylation status, as determined by a high cutoff value (≥30%) in pyrosequencing, could be used to significantly stratify the survival of 50 IDH-mutant glioblastomas receiving temozolomide therapy (cohort A); this result was validated in another cohort of 25 IDH-mutant glioblastomas (cohort B). The median progression-free survival and median overall survival in cohort A were 9.33 and 13.76 months for unmethylated cases, and 18.37 and 41.61 months for methylated cases, and in cohort B were 6.97 and 9.10 months for unmethylated cases, and 23.40 and 26.40 months for methylated cases. In addition, we confirmed that the MGMT promoter methylation was significantly (P = 0.0001) correlated with longer OS in IDH-mutant patients with GBM, independently of age, gender distribution, tumor type (primary or recurrent/secondary), and the extent of resection.

Conclusions

MGMT promoter methylation has predictive value in IDH-mutant glioblastoma, but its cutoff value should be higher than that for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma.

Posttreatment Effect of MGMT Methylation Level on Glioblastoma Survival

The DNA repair protein O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) removes temozolomide-induced alkylation, thereby preventing DNA damage and cytotoxicity. We investigated the prognostic effect of different MGMT methylation levels on overall and progression-free survival in 327 patients with primary glioblastoma undergoing standard treatment. We obtained MGMT methylation level in 4 CpG sites using pyrosequencing. The association between MGMT methylation level and survival was investigated using Cox proportional hazards model and an extension to detect time-varying effects. We found an association between MGMT methylation level and overall survival (OS) from around 9 months after the diagnosis, with no association between MGMT methylation level and OS before that. For patients surviving at least 9 months even small increases in MGMT methylation level are significantly beneficial (HR = 0.97, 95% CI [0.96, 0.98]). The predictive ability of MGMT methylation level on OS from 9 months after diagnosis has a Harrel's C of 66%. We conclude that the MGMT methylation level is strongly associated with survival only for patients surviving beyond 9 months with considerable effects for levels much lower than previously reported. Prognostic evaluation of cut-points of MGMT methylation levels and of CpG island site selection should take the time-varying effect on overall survival into account.

The association between 11C-methionine uptake, IDH gene mutation, and MGMT promoter methylation in patients with grade II and III gliomas

AIM

To evaluate the association between ¹¹C-methionine positron-emission tomography (¹¹C-methionine PET) findings, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) gene mutation, and O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation in patients with grade II and III gliomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data were collected from 40 patients with grade II and III gliomas who underwent both magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ¹¹C-methionine PET as part of their pre-surgical examination. IDH mutation was examined via DNA sequencing, and MGMT promoter methylation via quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

RESULTS

A threshold of MGMT promoter methylation of 1% was significantly associated with tumour/normal tissue (T/N) ratio. The T/N ratio in samples with MGMT promoter methylation ≥1% was higher than that in samples with MGMT promoter methylation <1%, and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.011). Reliable prediction of MGMT promoter methylation (<1% versus ≥1%) was possible using the T/N ratio under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve with a sensitivity and specificity of 75% each (cut-off value=1.6: p=0.0226, area under the ROC curve [AUC]=0.76172). Conversely, the T/N ratio had no association with IDH mutation (p=0.6). The ROC curve revealed no reliable prediction of IDH mutation using the T/N ratio (p=0.606, AUC=0.60577).

CONCLUSION

¹¹C-methionine PET parameters can predict MGMT promoter methylation but not IDH mutation status. ¹¹C-methionine uptake may have limited potential to reflect DNA methylation processes in grade II and III gliomas.

Combined Therapy Sensitivity Index Based on a 13-Gene Signature Predicts Prognosis for IDH Wild-type and MGMT Promoter Unmethylated Glioblastoma Patients

Glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the lethal tumors with poor prognosis. However, prognostic prediction approaches need to be further explored. Therefore, we developed an evaluation system that could be used for prognostic prediction of GBM patients. Published mRNA expression datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA) were analyzed. Quantitative Realtime-PCR of signature genes and molecular aberrations of 178 Xiangya GBM patients were used for confirmation. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed for functional annotation. As a result, we established a 13-gene signature which named Combined Therapy Sensitivity Index (CTSI). Based on a cutoff point, we divided patients into high-risk group and low-risk group. Based on Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis, we found that patients in the high-risk group had a shorter overall survival time than patients in the low-risk group (p<0.001 in TCGA and CGGA datasets, p=0.047 in GSE4271 dataset, p=0.008 in Xiangya GBM cohort, HR: 1.65-3.42). By comparing the status of IDH mutation, TERT promoter mutation (TERTp-mut) and MGMT promoter methylation, CTSI was predictable in IDH wild-type (IDH-wt)/MGMT promoter unmethylated (MGMTp-unmeth) patients (p=0.037 in IDH-wt/TERTp-mut/MGMTp-unmeth subgroup, HR: 1.98; p=0.032 in IDH-wt/TERTp-wt/MGMTp-unmeth subgroup, HR: 2.09). Based on GESA, the Gene Ontology (GO) gene sets were enriched differently between CTSI high-risk and low-risk groups. Our results showed CTSI risk score can predict the prognosis of IDH-wt/MGMTp-unmeth GBM patients. Based on CTSI, combined with the status of IDH mutation, TERT promoter mutation and MGMT promoter methylation, a stepwise prognosis evaluation system which can provide precise prognosis prediction for GBM patients was established.

miR‑378a‑3p inhibits cellular proliferation and migration in glioblastoma multiforme by targeting tetraspanin 17

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and aggressive brain tumor and patients with this disease tend to have poor clinical outcome. MicroRNAs (miRs) are important regulators of a number of key pathways implicated in tumor pathogenesis. Recently, the expression of miR‑378 was shown to be dysregulated in several different types of cancer, including gastric cancer, colorectal cancer and oral carcinoma. Additional studies have demonstrated that miR‑378 may serve as a potential therapeutic target against human breast cancer. However, the underlying mechanisms and potential targets of miR‑378a‑3p involved in GBM remain unknown. The aim of the present of was to determine the effects of miR‑378a‑3p and its potential targets. Tetraspanin 17 (TSPAN17) is involved in the neoplastic events in GBM and is a member of the tetraspanin family of proteins. The tetraspanins are involved in the regulation of cell growth, migration and invasion of several different types of cancer cell lines, and may potentially act as an oncogene associated with GBM pathology. The results of the present study showed that high miR‑378a‑3p and low TSPAN17 expression levels were associated with improved survival in patients with GBM. Additionally, high levels of TSPAN17 were linked to the poor prognosis of patients with GBM aged 50‑60, larger tumor sizes (≥5 cm) and an advanced World Health Organization stage. TSPAN17 was identified and confirmed as a direct target of miR‑378a‑3p using a luciferase reporter assay in human glioma cell lines. Overexpression of miR‑378a‑3p in either of U87MG or MT‑330 cells decreased the expression of TSPAN17, promoted apoptosis and decreased proliferation, migration and invasion. Overexpression of TSPAN17 attenuated the aforementioned effects induced by miR‑378a‑3p overexpression. The present study indicated that miR‑378a‑3p suppresses the progression of GBM by reducing TSPAN17 expression, and may thus serve as a potential therapeutic target for treating patients with GBM.

Molecular Neuropathology in Practice: Clinical Profiling and Integrative Analysis of Molecular Alterations in Glioblastoma

Molecular profiling of glioblastoma has revealed complex cytogenetic, epigenetic, and molecular abnormalities that are necessary for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Our neuro-oncology group has developed a data-driven, institutional consensus guideline for efficient and optimal workup of glioblastomas based on our routine performance of molecular testing. We describe our institution’s testing algorithm, assay development, and genetic findings in glioblastoma, to illustrate current practices and challenges in neuropathology related to molecular and genetic testing. We have found that coordination of test requisition, tissue handling, and incorporation of results into the final pathologic diagnosis by the neuropathologist improve patient care. Here, we present analysis of O⁶-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase promoter methylation and next-generation sequencing results of 189 patients, obtained utilizing our internal processes led by the neuropathology team. Our institutional pathway for neuropathologist-driven molecular testing has streamlined the management of glioblastoma samples for efficient return of results for incorporation of genomic data into the pathological diagnosis and optimal patient care.

Updates in the Neuoroimaging and WHO Classification of Primary CNS Gliomas: A Review of Current Terminology, Diagnosis, and Clinical Relevance From a Radiologic Prospective

As new advances in the genomics and imaging of CNS tumors continues to evolve, a standardized system for classification is increasingly essential to diagnosis and management. The molecular markers introduced in the 2016 WHO classification of CNS tumors bring both practical and conceptual advances to the characterization of gliomas, strengthening the prognostic and predictive value of terminology while shedding light on the underlying mechanisms that drive biologic behavior. The purpose of this article is to provide a succinct overview of primary intracranial gliomas from a neuroradiologic prospective and according to the 5th edition WHO classification that was revised in 2016. An update of the molecular markers pertinent to defining the major lineages of brain gliomas will be provided, followed by discussion of the terminology, grading and imaging features associated with individual entities. Neuroradiologists should be aware of the key genomic and radiomic features of common brain gliomas, and familiar with an integrated approach to their diagnosis and grading.

A novel analytical model of MGMT methylation pyrosequencing offers improved predictive performance in patients with gliomas

The methylation status of the promoter of MGMT gene is a crucial factor influencing clinical decision-making in patients with gliomas. MGMT pyrosequencing results are often dichotomized by a cut-off value based on an average of several tested CpGs. However, this method frequently results in a "gray zone", representing a dilemma for physicians. We therefore propose a novel analytical model for MGMT methylation pyrosequencing. MGMT CpG heterogeneity was investigated in 213 glioma patients in two tested cohorts: cohort A in which CpGs 75-82 were tested and cohort B in which CpGs 72-78 were tested. The predictive performances of the novel and traditional averaging models were compared in 135 patients who received temozolomide using receiver operating characteristic curves and Kaplan-Meier curves, and in patients stratified according to isocitrate dehydrogenase gene mutation status. The results were validated in an independent cohort of 65 consecutive patients with high-grade gliomas from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas database. Heterogeneity of MGMT promoter CpG methylation level was observed in most gliomas. The optimal cut-off value for each individual CpG varied from 4-16%. The current analysis defined MGMT promoter methylation as occurring when at least three CpGs exceeded their respective cut-off values. This novel analysis could accurately predict the prognosis of patients in the methylation "gray zone" according to the standard averaging method, and improved the area under the curves from 0.67, 0.76, and 0.67 to 0.70, 0.84, and 0.72 in cohorts A, B, and the validation cohort, respectively, demonstrating superiority of this analytical method in all three cohorts. Furthermore, the advantages of the novel analysis were retained regardless of WHO grade and isocitrate dehydrogenase gene mutation status. In conclusion, this novel analytical model offers an improved clinical predictive performance for MGMT pyrosequencing results and is suitable for clinical use in patients with gliomas.

Combinations of four or more CpGs methylation present equivalent predictive value for MGMT expression and temozolomide therapeutic prognosis in gliomas

AIMS

The pyrosequencing (PSQ) has been regarded as the gold standard for MGMT promoter methylation testing in gliomas. However, various CpG combinations are currently used in clinical practice. We aimed to clarify how and how many CpGs combined is robust enough to predict MGMT mRNA expression and therapeutic prognosis of patients.

METHODS

Total 223 patients with WHO III/IV gliomas were enrolled from Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas, including two independent cohorts, the eight-site cohort (with CpGs 75-82 tested) and the seven-site cohort (with CpGs 72-78 tested). Spearman's correlation and ROC curves were employed to investigate the value of different CpG combinations on predicting MGMT mRNA expression. The ROC curves and Kaplan-Meier steps were performed to compare the TMZ therapeutic prognostic values of different CpG combinations.

RESULTS

The methylation level of all individual CpG and CpG combinations for the eleven CpGs (CpGs 72-82), significantly correlated to MGMT mRNA expression (Spearman, all P < 0.0001), could effectively predict the mRNA expression (AUC, 0.86-0.91 in the eight-site cohort, 0.83-0.90 in the seven-site cohort). Moreover, the correlation coefficients and the predictive values presented equivalent when four or more CpGs combinedly used (AUC, 0.88-0.90 in the eight-site cohort, 0.87-0.88 in the seven-site cohort). Finally, similar results were also observed when using selected CpG combinations to predict therapeutic prognosis of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Four-CpG combinations of pyrosequencing are sufficient for evaluating the methylation status of MGMT and predicting therapeutic prognosis in gliomas.

Long non-coding RNA SNHG12promotes the proliferation and migration of glioma cells by binding to HuR

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) play important roles in biological processes and provide a novel approach with which to understand the molecular mechanisms responsible for glioma. Previous studies have demonstrated that lncRNA small nucleolar RNA host gene 12 (SNHG12) is involved in cell growth and migration. However, the accurate expression pattern of SNHG12 in glioma and the possible associations between this pattern and the clinicopathological characteristics of glioma cohorts are not yet known. The present study investigated the role of lncRNA SNHG12 in the development and progression of glioma, as well as the potential diagnostic value of SNHG12 in patients with glioma. The levels of SNHG12 were detected in resected specimens from patients and in glioma cell lines using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The potential effects of SNHG12 on the viability, mobility and apoptosis of glioma cells were evaluated using in vitro assays. The association between SNHG12 and Hu antigen R (HuR) was also determined using RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) and RNA pull-down assays. The results revealed that SNHG12 was significantly upregulated in glioma tissues and cell lines. High levels of SNHG12 were associated with the deterioration of patients with glioma. Patients with high levels of SNHG12 exhibited a reduced 5-year overall survival rate (compared to those with lower levels), particularly in cohorts with high-grade carcinoma (III-IV). The silencing of SNHG12 expression by RNA interference led to a reduced viability and mobility, and in an increased apoptosis of human glioma cells. Furthermore, RIP and RNA pull-down assays demonstrated that SNHG12 was associated with and was stabilized by HuR. The findings of the present study thus identify a novel therapeutic target in glioma.

The TERT promoter mutation status and MGMT promoter methylation status, combined with dichotomized MRI-derived and clinical features, predict adult primary glioblastoma survival

Purpose

This study aimed to integrate the TERT promoter mutation status, MGMT promoter methylation status, MRI‐derived features, and clinical features into a survival analysis model to better understand adult primary glioblastoma prognosis‐related markers.

Method

A total of 304 adult glioblastoma samples collected after surgical resection were selected for retrospective analysis, and Sanger sequencing was performed to detect IDH and TERT promoter mutations. The methylation of the MGMT promoter was analyzed by pyrosequencing, and MRI‐derived and clinical features were dichotomized into easily acquired variables. Random survival forest analysis, Kaplan‐Meier analysis, Cox proportional hazard regression, and LASSO regression were performed for the survival analysis, and ROC analysis and Pearson's chi‐squared test were employed for the correlation analysis.

Results

Wild‐type IDH was present in 89.8% of the adult glioblastoma samples, and TERT promoter mutations and MGMT promoter methylation were observed in 66.42% and 38.49% of all adult primary glioblastomas, respectively. Age and MGMT promoter methylation were identified as independent prognostic biomarkers, and the TERT promoter mutation status and MGMT promoter methylation status, when combined with other tumor‐related factors, generated several different survival subgroups. None of the factors investigated in this study predicted the MGMT promoter status, and MRI‐detected necrosis was positively associated with TERT promoter mutations.

Conclusion

MGMT promoter methylation and TERT promoter mutations, combined with MRI‐derived and clinical features, revealed different survival subgroups with distinct responses to current treatments, and this information increases the ability to predict the survival of adult primary glioblastoma patients. MRI‐detected necrosis often indicates the presence of TERT promoter mutations.

The IDH1 Mutation-Induced Oncometabolite, 2-Hydroxyglutarate, May Affect DNA Methylation and Expression of PD-L1 in Gliomas

Background: Malignant gliomas are heterogeneous brain tumors with the potential for aggressive disease progression, as influenced by suppressive immunoediting. Given the success and enhanced potential of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in immunotherapy, we focused on the connections between genetic alterations affected by IDH1 mutations and immunological landscape changes and PDL-1 expression in gliomas.

Methods: Paired surgically resected tumors from lower-grade gliomas (LGGs) and glioblastomas (GBM) were investigated, and a genetic analysis of patients' primary tumor samples culled from TCGA datasets was performed.

Results: The results demonstrate that when compared with IDH1-mutant tumors, IDH1 wildtype tumors represent an immunosuppression landscape and elevated levels of PD-L1 expression. DNA hypo-methylation of the PD-L1 gene, as well as high gene and protein expressions, were observed in the wildtype tumors. We also found that quantitative levels of IDH1 mutant proteins were positively associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS). A key product of the IDH1 mutation (2-hydroxyglutarate) was found to transiently increase DNA methylation and suppress PD-L1 expression.

Conclusions: IDH1 mutations impact the immune landscape of gliomas by affecting immune infiltrations and manipulating checkpoint ligand PD-L1 expression. Applications of immune checkpoint inhibitors may be beneficial for chemoradiation-insensitive IDH1-wildtype gliomas.

Beyond Brooding on Oncometabolic Havoc in IDH-Mutant Gliomas and AML: Current and Future Therapeutic Strategies

Isocitrate dehydrogenases 1 and 2 (IDH1,2), the key Krebs cycle enzymes that generate NADPH reducing equivalents, undergo heterozygous mutations in >70% of low- to mid-grade gliomas and ~20% of acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs) and gain an unusual new activity of reducing the α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) to D-2 hydroxyglutarate (D-2HG) in a NADPH-consuming reaction. The oncometabolite D-2HG, which accumulates >35 mM, is widely accepted to drive a progressive oncogenesis besides exacerbating the already increased oxidative stress in these cancers. More importantly, D-2HG competes with α-KG and inhibits a large number of α-KG-dependent dioxygenases such as TET (Ten-eleven translocation), JmjC domain-containing KDMs (histone lysine demethylases), and the ALKBH DNA repair proteins that ultimately lead to hypermethylation of the CpG islands in the genome. The resulting CpG Island Methylator Phenotype (CIMP) accounts for major gene expression changes including the silencing of the MGMT (O⁶-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase) repair protein in gliomas. Glioma patients with IDH1 mutations also show better therapeutic responses and longer survival, the reasons for which are yet unclear. There has been a great surge in drug discovery for curtailing the mutant IDH activities, and arresting tumor proliferation; however, given the unique and chronic metabolic effects of D-2HG, the promise of these compounds for glioma treatment is uncertain. This comprehensive review discusses the biology, current drug design and opportunities for improved therapies through exploitable synthetic lethality pathways, and an intriguing oncometabolite-inspired strategy for primary glioblastoma.

Prognostic value of O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) protein expression in glioblastoma excluding nontumour cells from the analysis

AIMS

It is important to predict response to treatment with temozolomide (TMZ) in glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Both MGMT protein expression and MGMT promoter methylation status have been reported to predict the response to TMZ. We investigated the prognostic value of quantified MGMT protein levels in tumour cells and the prognostic importance of combining information of MGMT protein level and MGMT promoter methylation status.

METHODS

MGMT protein expression was quantified in tumour cells in 171 GBMs from the population-based Region of Southern Denmark (RSD)-cohort using a double immunofluorescence approach. Pyrosequencing was performed in 157 patients. For validation we used GBM-patients from a Nordic Study (NS) investigating the effect of radiotherapy and different TMZ schedules.

RESULTS

When divided at the median, patients with low expression of MGMT protein (AF-low) had the best prognosis (HR = 1.5, P = 0.01). Similar results were observed in the subgroup of patients receiving the Stupp regimen (HR = 2.0, P = 0.001). In the NS-cohort a trend towards superior survival (HR = 1.6, P = 0.08) was seen in patients with AF-low. Including MGMT promoter methylation status, we found for both cohorts that patients with methylated MGMT promoter and AF-low had the best outcome; median OS 23.1 and 20.0 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that MGMT protein expression in tumour cells has an independent prognostic significance. Exclusion of nontumour cells contributed to a more exact analysis of tumour-specific MGMT protein expression. This should be incorporated in future studies evaluating MGMT status before potential integration into clinical practice.

IDH-1R132H mutation status in diffuse glioma patients: implications for classification

WHO2007 grading of diffuse gliomas in adults is well-established. However, IDH mutations make classification of gliomas according to the WHO2007 edition controversial. Here, we characterized IDH-1R132H mut status in a cohort of 670 adult patients with different WHO2007 grades of diffuse glioma. Patient characteristics, clinical data and prognoses were obtained from medical records. Patients with IDH-1R132H mut were younger and had better clinical outcomes than those without mutations. Differences in age among patients with astrocytomas of different WHO2007 grades were eliminated after patients were grouped based on IDH-1R132H status. IDH-1R132H mut was present more often in patients with lower Ki-67 and MGMT protein levels and higher mutant p53 levels. Ki-67 was also strongly associated with WHO2007 grade independently of IDH-1R132H mut status. Moreover, patients with Ki-67<30 survived longer than those with Ki-67≥30, regardless of IDH-1R132H mut status. Patients in the IDH-1R132H mut group with lower MGMT protein levels also had better clinical outcomes than those in other groups. Our results indicate that to better treat gliomas, IDH mutation status should be included when determining WHO2007 grade in glioma patients.

Glioblastoma Treatment in the Elderly

Although current treatment advances prolong patient survival, treatment for glioblastoma (GBM) in the elderly has become an emerging issue. The definition of "elderly" differs across articles; GBM predominantly occurs at an age ≥65 years, and the prognosis worsens with increasing age. Regarding molecular markers, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations are less common in the elderly with GBM. Meanwhile, O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation has been identified in approximately half of patients with GBM. Surgery should be considered as the first-line treatment even for elderly patients, and maximum safe resection is recommended if feasible. Concurrently, radiotherapy is the standard adjuvant therapy. Hypofractionated radiotherapy (e.g., 40 Gy/15 Fr) is suitable for elderly patients. Studies also supported the concurrent use of temozolomide (TMZ) with radiotherapy. In cases wherein elderly patients cannot tolerate chemoradiation, TMZ monotherapy is an effective option when MGMT promoter methylation is verified. Conversely, tumors with MGMT unmethylated promoter may be treated with radiotherapy alone to reduce the possible toxicity of TMZ. Meanwhile, the efficacy of bevacizumab (BEV) in elderly patients remains unclear. Similarly, further studies on the efficacy of carmustine wafers are needed. Based on current knowledge, we propose a treatment diagram for GBM in the elderly.

Long non-coding RNA PAR5 inhibits the proliferation and progression of glioma through interaction with EZH2

Emerging evidence suggests that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) may be involved in modulating various aspects of tumor biology and serve as potential therapeutic targets as well as novel biomarkers in the treatment of glioma. The present study investigated the role of lncRNA, Prader Willi/Angelman region RNA 5 (PAR5; also known as PWAR5), in glioma and its clinical significance in glioma cases. The expression levels of PAR5 were determined in clinical samples and U87, U251 cells using real-time reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis. The effects of PAR5 on cell proliferation, migration and invasion were determined using in vitro assays. RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) and RNA pull-down assays, as well as the evauation of the expression of various oncogenes were carried out to reveal the underlying mechanisms. We found that PAR5 was significantly downregulated in glioma tissues and cell lines. Furthermore, PAR5 expression was negatively correlated with tumor size, World Health Organization (WHO) grade and Karnofsky performance score (KPS). Patients with low PAR5 expression in tumors had a worse overall survival compared to those with higher expression. Finally, in vitro restoration of PAR5 expression inhibited human glioma cell proliferation, invasion and migration by binding to EZH2 and regulating oncogene expression. This finding may provide a therapeutic approach for the future treatment of glioma.

PLK1 inhibition enhances temozolomide efficacy in IDH1 mutant gliomas

Despite multimodal therapy with radiation and the DNA alkylating agent temozolomide (TMZ), malignant gliomas remain incurable. Up to 90% of grades II-III gliomas contain a single mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) allele. IDH1 mutant-mediated transformation is associated with TMZ resistance; however, there is no clinically available means of sensitizing IDH1 mutant tumors to TMZ. In this study we sought to identify a targetable mechanism of TMZ resistance in IDH1 mutant tumors to enhance TMZ efficacy. IDH1 mutant astrocytes rapidly bypassed the G2 checkpoint with unrepaired DNA damage following TMZ treatment. Checkpoint adaptation was accompanied by PLK1 activation and IDH1 mutant astrocytes were more sensitive to treatment with BI2536 and TMZ in combination (<20% clonogenic survival) than either TMZ (~60%) or BI2536 (~75%) as single agents. In vivo, TMZ or BI2536 alone had little effect on tumor size. Combination treatment caused marked tumor shrinkage in all mice and complete tumor regression in 5 of 8 mice. Mutant IDH1 promotes checkpoint adaptation which can be exploited therapeutically with the combination of TMZ and a PLK1 inhibitor, indicating PLK1 inhibitors may be clinically valuable in the treatment of IDH1 mutant gliomas.

LAPTM4B-35 is a novel prognostic factor for glioblastoma

Lysosome-associated protein transmembrane-4 beta (LAPTM4B)-35, a newly identified cancer-associated gene, is overexpressed in a wide variety of malignant tumors. However, studies of its expression and role in glioma have not yet been reported. This study aimed to investigate the expression and the role of LAPTM4B-35 in glioma and to assess its value as a prognostic factor. Seventy-seven glioma cases (Grade II in 18 patients, Grade III in 16 and Grade IV in 43) were immunohistochemically examined for LAPTM4B-35, pAkt, factor VIII and Ki-67 expressions. The LAPTM4B-35 expression score of Grade II gliomas was lower than those of Grade III-IV gliomas (p < 0.05), while the difference between Grade III and IV gliomas was not statistically significant. Of the 43 patients with glioblastoma (GBM), 27 (62.8%) had high LAPTM4B-35 expression, which was associated with high tumor micro-vessel density and pAkt activation. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of GBM patients with high LAPTM4B-35 expression was 5.13 months, significantly shorter than that of those with low LAPTM4B-35 expression (12.0 months, p < 0.0001). The median overall survival (OS) of GBM patients with high LAPTM4B-35 expression was 12.5 months, again significantly shorter than that of those with low LAPTM4B-35 expression (29.6 months, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis indicated LAPTM4B-35 to be an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS of GBM patients. Our findings show LAPTM4B-35 to be strongly associated with tumor proliferation, tumor angiogenesis and poor outcomes of GBM patients, suggesting LAPTM4B-35 to potentially be applicable as a novel prognostic marker and even to possibly play a role in improving GBM treatment.

The prognostic value of MGMT promoter status by pyrosequencing assay for glioblastoma patients' survival: a meta-analysis

Background

The prognostic value of the status of O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation measured by pyrosequencing assay (PSQ) among glioblastoma (GBM) patients was examined in meta-analysis.

Methods

Eligible studies that reported the association between the status of MGMT promoter methylation by PSQ and prognostic value of GBM patients from three electronic databases, like PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library were involved in meta-analysis. Using Stata 11.0, the summarized hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and the progression-free survival (PFS) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) were calculated.

Results

Eleven studies were included to evaluate the relationship between the status of MGMT promoter methylation and GBM patients’ survival. Overall, regardless of the cut-off value of methylation status of MGMT promoter by PSQ, methylated-positive patients were evidently associated with an improved HRs for OS (HRs = 0.50, 95 % CI = 0.35–0.66). For summary, progression-free survival (PFS) from four studies, the prognostic effect was also found (HRs = 0.56, 95 % CI = 0.32–0.80).

Conclusion

Methylation positivity of MGMT promoter by PSQ was related to an increased survival in GBM patients. Thus, the status of MGMT promoter methylation by PSQ might be used to be a prognostic biomarker, and GBM patients might have a vested interest in clinical application of standardized PSQ.

A combination of TERT promoter mutation and MGMT methylation status predicts clinically relevant subgroups of newly diagnosed glioblastomas

The prognostic impact of TERT mutations has been controversial in IDH-wild tumors, particularly in glioblastomas (GBM). The controversy may be attributable to presence of potential confounding factors such as MGMT methylation status or patients' treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of TERT status on patient outcome in association with various factors in a large series of adult diffuse gliomas. We analyzed a total of 951 adult diffuse gliomas from two cohorts (Cohort 1, n = 758; Cohort 2, n = 193) for IDH1/2, 1p/19q, and TERT promoter status. The combined IDH/TERT classification divided Cohort 1 into four molecular groups with distinct outcomes. The overall survival (OS) was the shortest in IDH wild-type/TERT mutated groups, which mostly consisted of GBMs (P < 0.0001). To investigate the association between TERT mutations and MGMT methylation on survival of patients with GBM, samples from a combined cohort of 453 IDH-wild-type GBM cases treated with radiation and temozolomide were analyzed. A multivariate Cox regression model revealed that the interaction between TERT and MGMT was significant for OS (P = 0.0064). Compared with TERT mutant-MGMT unmethylated GBMs, the hazard ratio (HR) for OS incorporating the interaction was the lowest in the TERT mutant-MGMT methylated GBM (HR, 0.266), followed by the TERT wild-type-MGMT methylated (HR, 0.317) and the TERT wild-type-MGMT unmethylated GBMs (HR, 0.542). Thus, patients with TERT mutant-MGMT unmethylated GBM have the poorest prognosis. Our findings suggest that a combination of IDH, TERT, and MGMT refines the classification of grade II-IV diffuse gliomas.

Identification of MGMT promoter methylation sites correlating with gene expression and IDH1 mutation in gliomas

O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter methylation was reported to be an independent prognostic and predictive factor in glioma patients who received temozolomide treatment. However, the predictive value of MGMT methylation was recently questioned by several large clinical studies. The purpose of this study is to identify MGMT gene promoter CpG sites or region whose methylation were closely correlated with its gene expression to elucidate this contradictory clinical observations. The methylation status for all CpG dinucleotides in MGMT promoter and first exon region were determined in 42 Chinese glioma patients, which were then correlated with MGMT gene expression, IDH1 mutation, and tumor grade. In whole 87 CpG dinucleotides analyzed, three distinct CpG regions covering 28 CpG dinucleotides were significantly correlated with MGMT gene expression; 10 CpG dinucleotides were significantly correlated with glioma classification (p < 0.05). Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutation and MGMT gene hypermethylation significantly co-existed, but not for MGMT gene expression. The validation cohort of gliomas treated with standard of care and comparison of the CpGs we identified with the current CpGs used in clinical setting will be very important for gliomas individual medicine in the future.

Clinical Neuropathology practice guide 5-2015: MGMT methylation pyrosequencing in glioblastoma: unresolved issues and open questions

O6-methylguanine-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status has prognostic and, in the subpopulation of elderly patients, predictive value in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Therefore, knowledge of the MGMT promoter methylation status is important for clinical decision-making. So far, MGMT testing has been limited by the lack of a robust test with sufficiently high analytical performance. Recently, one of several available pyrosequencing protocols has been shown to be an accurate and robust method for MGMT testing in an intra- and interlaboratory ring trial. However, some uncertainties remain with regard to methodological issues, cut-off definitions, and optimal use in the clinical setting. In this article, we highlight and discuss several of these open questions. The main unresolved issues are the definition of the most relevant CpG sites to analyze for clinical purposes and the determination of a cut-off value for dichotomization of quantitative MGMT pyrosequencing results into "MGMT methylated" and "MGMT unmethylated" patient subgroups as a basis for further treatment decisions.

Case-Based Review: newly diagnosed glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (WHO grade IV astrocytoma) is the most common and most aggressive primary brain tumor in adults. Optimal treatment of a patient with glioblastoma requires collaborative care across numerous specialties. The diagnosis of glioblastoma may be suggested by the symptomatic presentation and imaging, but it must be pathologically confirmed via surgery, which can have dual diagnostic and therapeutic roles. Standard of care postsurgical treatment for newly diagnosed patients involves radiation therapy and oral temozolomide chemotherapy. Despite numerous recent trials of novel therapeutic approaches, this standard of care has not changed in over a decade. Treatment options under active investigation include molecularly targeted therapies, immunotherapeutic approaches, and the use of alternating electrical field to disrupt tumor cell division. These trials may be aided by new insights into glioblastoma heterogeneity, allowing for focused evaluation of new treatments in the patient subpopulations most likely to benefit from them. Because glioblastoma is incurable by current therapies, frequent clinical and radiographic assessment is needed after initial treatment to allow for early intervention upon progressive tumor when it occurs.

Anaplastic glioma: current treatment and management

Anaplastic glioma (AG) is divided into three morphology-based groups (anaplastic astrocytoma, anaplastic oligodendroglioma, anaplastic oligoastrocytoma) as well as three molecular groups (glioma-CpG island methylation phenotype [G-CIMP] negative, G-CIMP positive non-1p19q codeleted tumors and G-CIMP positive codeleted tumors). The RTOG 9402 and EORTC 26951 trials established radiotherapy plus (procarbazine, lomustine, vincristine) chemotherapy as the standard of care in 1p/19q codeleted AG. Uni- or non-codeleted AG are currently best treated with radiotherapy only or alkylator-based chemotherapy only as determined by the NOA-04 trial. Maturation of NOA-04 and results of the currently accruing studies, CODEL (for codeleted AG) and CATNON (for uni or non-codeleted AG), will likely refine current up-front treatment recommendations for AG.

Molecular and genetic pathways in gliomas: the future of personalized therapeutics

In the last few decades, we have seen significant advances in brain imaging, which have resulted in more detailed anatomic and functional localization of gliomas in relation to the eloquent cortex, as well as improvements in microsurgical techniques and enhanced delivery of adjuvant stereotactic radiation. While these advancements have led to a relatively modest improvement in clinical outcomes for patients with malignant gliomas, much more work remains to be done. As with other types of cancer, we are now rapidly moving past the era of histopathology dictating treatment for brain tumors and into the realm of molecular diagnostics and associated targeted therapies, specifically based on the genomic architecture of individual gliomas. In this review, we discuss the current era of molecular glioma characterization and how these profiles will allow for individualized, patient-specific targeted treatments.

Indications for Treatment: Is Observation or Chemotherapy Alone a Reasonable Approach in the Management of Low-Grade Gliomas?

The treatment of newly diagnosed low-grade gliomas remains controversial. Recently published results from the long-term follow-up of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trial 9802 demonstrated medically meaningful and statistically significant survival prolongation by adding chemotherapy with procarbazine, lomustine (CCNU), and vincristine after radiotherapy (RT) vs RT alone for "high"-risk patients (median 13.3 vs 7.8 years, hazard ratio = 0.59, P = 0.03). However, in the 17 years since that trial was launched, there have been advances in the understanding of low-grade gliomas biology and patient heterogeneity, an increased recognition of late neurocognitive injury from early RT, and the emergence of temozolomide as an alternative chemotherapy to procarbazine, lomustine (CCNU), and vincristine. These and other changes in the treatment landscape make the applicability of results from RTOG 9802 to all patients less clear. Moreover, in some patients, especially those at the lowest risk for early disease progression, deferred RT in favor of active surveillance or chemotherapy alone may remain a reasonable treatment approach.

Impact on prognosis of the regional distribution of MGMT methylation with respect to the CpG island methylator phenotype and age in glioma patients

Clinical and molecular prognostic factors in gliomas include age, IDH mutation, the glioma CpG island methylator phenotype (G-CIMP+) and promoter methylation of the O(6)-methylguanine DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) gene. Among these markers, a predictive value was reported in glioblastomas (GBM) for MGMT promoter methylation, in particular in elderly GBM patients. In this study, methylation data from 46 glioma samples with the Illumina 450K platform were obtained and extended using external data to include a total of 247 glioma samples. Methylation analysis of the whole MGMT gene with this platform revealed two strongly survival-associated CpG regions within the promoter and the gene body, which were confirmed in a reported dataset of high grade-gliomas. Methylation at the promoter (CpG 25, cg12981137 and the prognostic model MGMT-STP27) and at the gene body CpG 165 (cg07933035), were significantly associated with better overall survival, and strongly correlated with G-CIMP+ status. In this series, the prognostic value of MGMT methylation at the promoter was not observed in G-CIMP- cases, although around 50 % of them were MGMT-methylated. These results were also obtained in an homogeneously-treated series of chemoradiated G-CIMP- GBMs analyzed by MSP and qMSP, and confirmed in a reported pyrosequencing-analyzed series of gliomas. Interestingly, in contrast to the MGMT promoter, gene body methylation was of prognostic value in G-CIMP-patients older than 65 years. Our study highlights the relevance of the prognostic value of the different regions of methylation throughout the MGMT gene that could be affected by specific G-CIMP profiles and age groups.

MGMT promoter methylation in non-neoplastic brain

O(6)-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) is mainly regulated by cytosine-guanine island promoter methylation that is believed to occur only in neoplastic tissue. The present study was undertaken to investigate whether methylation occurs also in non-neoplastic brains by collecting 45 non-neoplastic brains from autopsies and 56 lobectomy specimens from epileptic surgeries. The promoter methylation status of MGMT was studied by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) and pyrosequencing (PSQ), while protein expression was studied by immunohistochemical stain (IHC). The methylation rates, as determined by MSP and PSQ, were 3.0 % (3/101) and 2.9 % (2/69), respectively. Of note, no case had positive result concomitantly from both MSP and PSQ (3 were MSP+/PSQ- and 2 were MSP-/PSQ+), and all the positive samples were further confirmed by cloning and Sanger sequencing. All the methylated cases, except for those having indeterminate IHC results from autopsy specimens, revealed no loss of MGMT protein expression and similar staining pattern to that of the unmethylated cases. In conclusion, the current study demonstrated that MGMT promoter methylation could occur in a low percentage of non-neoplastic brains but did not affect the status of protein expression, which could be regarded as a normal variation in non-neoplastic brains.