No generally increased risk of cancer after total hip arthroplasty performed due to osteoarthritis

Osteosarcoma After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Report

CASE

A 79-year-old woman presented with a periprosthetic fracture 8 years after a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Radiographs demonstrated tibial implant loosening with severe osteolysis. A high-grade osteosarcoma around the prosthesis was diagnosed, and a supracondylar femoral amputation was performed. After 2 years, no complications have occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

A malignant tumor around a TKA is extremely rare. Surgeons should remain vigilant with patients who present with rapidly progressive or very aggressive implant loosening with osteolysis. Owing to its complexity and potentially devastating prognosis, treatment should be guided by a specialist multidisciplinary team. Complex limb salvage procedures or amputation is usually required.

Concentrations of Cobalt, Chromium and Titanium and Immunological Changes after Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty-A Cohort Study with an 18-Year Follow-Up

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) generates elevated metal ion concentrations, but long-term changes in the concentrations of cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr) and titanium (Ti) after primary TKA and potential subsequent immune system activation-not limited to the joint but systemically-are not known. Patients and Methods: We conducted a cohort study on 26 patients with TKA (19 women; 16 with metal-backed and 10 with all-polyethylene tibial components) 18.3 years (min. 16.7, max. 20.5) after index TKA. A total of 69% of patients additionally underwent subsequent arthroplasty of the contralateral knee or either hip after the index surgery. Blood samples were analysed by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry, and leukocytes were characterised by flow cytometry. Patients were clinically assessed using the Knee Society score and by plain radiography of the knee. Results: The median metal ion concentrations were 0.7 (0.1-13.0) µg/L for Co, 0.9 (0.4-5.0) µg/L for Cr, and 1.0 (0.2-13.0) µg/L for Ti. There was no relevant difference in systemic metal ion concentrations between patients exposed to single and multiple arthroplasties. The absolute count and proportion of CD3+CD4+CD8+ T cells was inversely correlated with both Co (rho -0.55, p = 0.003) and Cr concentrations (rho -0.59, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Between the first and second decades after primary TKA, in most patients, the concentrations of Co, Cr and Ti in blood samples were below the thresholds that are considered alarming. The negative correlation of Co and Cr concentrations with a subset of lymphocytes that commonly increases during immune activation is reassuring. This represents a worst-case scenario, underscoring that the investigated metal ions remain within reasonable ranges, even after additional hardware exposure.

The causal relationship between osteoarthritis and bladder cancer: A Mendelian randomization study

OBJECTIVE

The causal association between osteoarthritis (OA) and bladder cancer remains unclear. This Mendelian randomization (MR) study was carried out to assess the potential causal effects of any OA, knee OA and hip OA, and bladder cancer.

METHOD

Genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary data for OA and bladder cancer were obtained in GWAS CATALOG, UK Biobank, and FinnGen Consortium. Inverse-variance weighted (IVW) approach was primarily conducted to evaluate the causal relationships between OA and bladder cancer, and MR-Egger intercept and Cochran's Q test were mainly used to estimate heterogeneity and pleiotropy. MR-PRESSO was used to test the presence of horizontal outliers. Leave-one-out analysis was utilized to ensure the reliability of the results.

RESULTS

A higher genetic predisposition to any OA has a causal association with bladder cancer risk, while neither knee OA nor hip OA is causally linked to bladder cancer. MR-Egger intercept analysis exhibited that any OA and knee OA had no pleiotropic effect on the risk of bladder cancer, and Cochran's Q test showed that any OA, knee OA and hip OA had no heterogeneity on bladder cancer risk. Neither MR PRESSO analysis nor leave-one-out analysis revealed any outlier SNPs.

CONCLUSIONS

This MR study exhibited a positive cause-and-effect relationship between any type of OA and bladder cancer risk, but not between site-specific OA, knee OA and hip OA, and bladder cancer. Attention should be paid to the screening and prevention of bladder cancer in OA patients at any site.

No increased risk of cancer associated with metal-on-metal or ceramic-on-ceramic procedures compared to other bearing surfaces in patients with total hip arthroplasty: A nationwide linked registry cohort analysis of 167,837 patients

OBJECTIVES

Studies have identified increased cancer risk among patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) compared to the general population. However, evidence of all-cause and site-specific cancer risk associated with different bearing surfaces has varied, with previous studies having short latency periods with respect to use of modern Metal-on-Metal (MoM) bearings. Using the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) linked to Australasian Association of Cancer Registries data, our aim was to evaluate risk of all-cause and site-specific cancer according to bearing surfaces in patients undergoing THA for osteoarthritis and whether risk increased with MoM bearings.

METHODS

Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by comparing number of observed cancer cases to expected number based on incidence rate in the Australian population. All-cause and site-specific cancer rates were calculated for all conventional stemmed THA (csTHA) and resurfacing THA (rsTHA) procedures performed for osteoarthritis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare cancer rates for MoM, ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) and resurfacing procedures with a comparison group comprising metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) or ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP) procedures.

RESULTS

There were 156,516 patients with csTHA procedures and 11,321 with rsTHA procedures for osteoarthritis performed between 1999 and 2012. Incidence of all-cause cancer was significantly higher for csTHA (SIR 1.24, 95% CI 1.22-1.26) and rsTHA (SIR 1.74, 95% CI 1.39-2.04) compared to the Australian population. For csTHA, there was no significant difference in all-site cancer rates for MoM (Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.01, 95%CI 0.96-1.07) or CoC (HR 0.98, 95%CI 0.94-1.02) compared to MoP and CoP bearings. Significantly increased risk of melanoma, non-Hodgkins lymphoma, myeloma, leukaemia, prostate, colon, bladder and kidney cancer was found for csTHA and, prostate cancer, melanoma for rsTHA procedures when compared to the Australian population, although risk was not significantly different across bearing surfaces.

CONCLUSIONS

csTHA and rsTHA procedures were associated with increased cancer incidence compared to the Australian population. However, no excess risk was observed for MoM or CoC procedures compared to other bearing surfaces.

Similar risk of cancer in patients younger than 55 years with or without a total hip arthroplasty (THA): a population- based cohort study on 18,771 exposed to THA and 87,683 controls

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Concerns related to a potentially increased risk of cancer after total hip arthroplasty (THA) have frequently surfaced, especially since the novel EU medical device regulation classified cobalt as carcinogenic. We assessed the risk of cancer after THA in a nationwide cohort of patients younger than 55 years at surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this population-based longitudinal cohort study, 18,771 individuals exposed to THA were identified in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Registry (SHAR) and compared with 87,683 unexposed individuals who were matched by age, sex, and residence. Diagnoses, socioeconomic background, and dates of death were obtained from the Swedish Cancer Register, the National Patient Register, and Statistics Sweden. Primary outcome was the adjusted risk of any cancer after the first THA; secondary outcomes were specific cancer forms.

RESULTS

We found no enhanced adjusted risk of developing any cancer, either in exposed females compared with unexposed females (hazard ratio [HR] 1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95-1.2), or in exposed males (HR 1.1, CI 0.99-1.2). When analysing specific cancers, increased adjusted risks were found for thyroid and pancreas cancer in exposed females, and for cancer of the stomach, skin melanoma, and prostate cancer in exposed males.

INTERPRETATION

This study indicates that there is no statistically significant increased overall risk of cancer in young THA-exposed patients. The potentially slightly enhanced risk for specific cancers may be due to residual confounding resulting from risk factors not accounted for and merits further investigation.

Site-specific cancer risk following cobalt exposure via orthopedic implants or in occupational settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis

In 2020, the European Commission up-classified metal cobalt as Class 1B Carcinogen (presumed to have carcinogenic potential) based primarily on data from rodent inhalation carcinogenicity studies. This up-classification requires an assessment under the Medical Device Regulations of cobalt cancer risk from medical devices. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate site-specific cancer risks with cobalt exposure from either total joint replacement (TJR) or occupational exposure (OC). Results were stratified by exposure type (OC or TJR), exposure level (metal-on-metal (MoM) or non-MoM), follow-up duration (latency period: <5, 5-10 or >10 years), and cancer incidence or mortality (detection bias assessment). From 30 studies (653,104 subjects, average 14.5 years follow-up), the association between TJR/OC and cancer risk was null for 22 of 27 cancer sites, negative for 3 sites, and positive for prostate cancer and myeloma. Significant heterogeneity and large estimate ranges were observed for many cancer sites. No significant increase in estimates was observed by exposure level or follow-up duration. The current evidence, including weak associations, heterogeneity across studies and no increased association with exposure level or follow-up duration, is insufficient to conclude that there exists an increased risk for people exposed to cobalt in TJR/OC of developing site-specific cancers.