1
|
Ye Z, Dite GS, Nguyen TL, MacInnis RJ, Schmidt DF, Makalic E, Al-Qershi OM, Nguyen-Dumont T, Goudey B, Stone J, Dowty JG, Giles GG, Southey MC, Hopper JL, Li S. Genetic and Environmental Causes of Variation in an Automated Breast Cancer Risk Factor Based on Mammographic Textures. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024; 33:306-313. [PMID: 38059829 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-1012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cirrus is an automated risk predictor for breast cancer that comprises texture-based mammographic features and is mostly independent of mammographic density. We investigated genetic and environmental variance of variation in Cirrus. METHODS We measured Cirrus for 3,195 breast cancer-free participants, including 527 pairs of monozygotic (MZ) twins, 271 pairs of dizygotic (DZ) twins, and 1,599 siblings of twins. Multivariate normal models were used to estimate the variance and familial correlations of age-adjusted Cirrus as a function of age. The classic twin model was expanded to allow the shared environment effects to differ by zygosity. The SNP-based heritability was estimated for a subset of 2,356 participants. RESULTS There was no evidence that the variance or familial correlations depended on age. The familial correlations were 0.52 (SE, 0.03) for MZ pairs and 0.16(SE, 0.03) for DZ and non-twin sister pairs combined. Shared environmental factors specific to MZ pairs accounted for 20% of the variance. Additive genetic factors accounted for 32% (SE = 5%) of the variance, consistent with the SNP-based heritability of 36% (SE = 16%). CONCLUSION Cirrus is substantially familial due to genetic factors and an influence of shared environmental factors that was evident for MZ twin pairs only. The latter could be due to nongenetic factors operating in utero or in early life that are shared by MZ twins. IMPACT Early-life factors, shared more by MZ pairs than DZ/non-twin sister pairs, could play a role in the variation in Cirrus, consistent with early life being recognized as a critical window of vulnerability to breast carcinogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhoufeng Ye
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gillian S Dite
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Genetic Technologies Limited, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tuong L Nguyen
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Robert J MacInnis
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Daniel F Schmidt
- Department of Data Science and AI, Faculty of IT, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Enes Makalic
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Osamah M Al-Qershi
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tu Nguyen-Dumont
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Benjamin Goudey
- ARC Training Centre in Cognitive Computing for Medical Technologies, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
- The Florey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jennifer Stone
- Genetic Epidemiology Group, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - James G Dowty
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Graham G Giles
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Shuai Li
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jiang S, Colditz GA. Causal mediation analysis using high-dimensional image mediator bounded in irregular domain with an application to breast cancer. Biometrics 2023; 79:3728-3738. [PMID: 36853975 PMCID: PMC10460830 DOI: 10.1111/biom.13847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
Mammography is the primary breast cancer screening strategy. Recent methods have been developed using the mammogram image to improve breast cancer risk prediction. However, it is unclear on the extent to which the effect of risk factors on breast cancer risk is mediated through tissue features summarized in mammogram images and the extent to which it is through other pathways. While mediation analysis has been conducted using mammographic density (a summary measure within the image), the mammogram image is not necessarily well described by a single summary measure and, in addition, such a measure provides no spatial information about the relationship between the exposure risk factor and the risk of breast cancer. Thus, to better understand the role of the mammogram images that provide spatial information about the state of the breast tissue that is causally predictive of the future occurrence of breast cancer, we propose a novel method of causal mediation analysis using mammogram image mediator while accommodating the irregular shape of the breast. We apply the proposed method to data from the Joanne Knight Breast Health Cohort and leverage new insights on the decomposition of the total association between risk factor and breast cancer risk that was mediated by the texture of the underlying breast tissue summarized in the mammogram image.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu Jiang
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Graham A Colditz
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ye Z, Nguyen TL, Dite GS, MacInnis RJ, Schmidt DF, Makalic E, Al-Qershi OM, Bui M, Esser VFC, Dowty JG, Trinh HN, Evans CF, Tan M, Sung J, Jenkins MA, Giles GG, Southey MC, Hopper JL, Li S. Causal relationships between breast cancer risk factors based on mammographic features. Breast Cancer Res 2023; 25:127. [PMID: 37880807 PMCID: PMC10598934 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-023-01733-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mammogram risk scores based on texture and density defined by different brightness thresholds are associated with breast cancer risk differently and could reveal distinct information about breast cancer risk. We aimed to investigate causal relationships between these intercorrelated mammogram risk scores to determine their relevance to breast cancer aetiology. METHODS We used digitised mammograms for 371 monozygotic twin pairs, aged 40-70 years without a prior diagnosis of breast cancer at the time of mammography, from the Australian Mammographic Density Twins and Sisters Study. We generated normalised, age-adjusted, and standardised risk scores based on textures using the Cirrus algorithm and on three spatially independent dense areas defined by increasing brightness threshold: light areas, bright areas, and brightest areas. Causal inference was made using the Inference about Causation from Examination of FAmilial CONfounding (ICE FALCON) method. RESULTS The mammogram risk scores were correlated within twin pairs and with each other (r = 0.22-0.81; all P < 0.005). We estimated that 28-92% of the associations between the risk scores could be attributed to causal relationships between the scores, with the rest attributed to familial confounders shared by the scores. There was consistent evidence for positive causal effects: of Cirrus, light areas, and bright areas on the brightest areas (accounting for 34%, 55%, and 85% of the associations, respectively); and of light areas and bright areas on Cirrus (accounting for 37% and 28%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In a mammogram, the lighter (less dense) areas have a causal effect on the brightest (highly dense) areas, including through a causal pathway via textural features. These causal relationships help us gain insight into the relative aetiological importance of different mammographic features in breast cancer. For example our findings are consistent with the brightest areas being more aetiologically important than lighter areas for screen-detected breast cancer; conversely, light areas being more aetiologically important for interval breast cancer. Additionally, specific textural features capture aetiologically independent breast cancer risk information from dense areas. These findings highlight the utility of ICE FALCON and family data in decomposing the associations between intercorrelated disease biomarkers into distinct biological pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhoufeng Ye
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3051, Australia
| | - Tuong L Nguyen
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3051, Australia
| | - Gillian S Dite
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3051, Australia
- Genetic Technologies Limited, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia
| | - Robert J MacInnis
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3051, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Daniel F Schmidt
- Department of Data Science and AI, Faculty of IT, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Enes Makalic
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3051, Australia
| | - Osamah M Al-Qershi
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3051, Australia
| | - Minh Bui
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3051, Australia
| | - Vivienne F C Esser
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3051, Australia
| | - James G Dowty
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3051, Australia
| | - Ho N Trinh
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3051, Australia
| | - Christopher F Evans
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3051, Australia
| | - Maxine Tan
- Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering Discipline, School of Engineering, Monash University Malaysia, 47500, Sunway City, Malaysia
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA
| | - Joohon Sung
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Genome and Health Big Data, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea
| | - Mark A Jenkins
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3051, Australia
| | - Graham G Giles
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3051, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia
- Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3051, Australia
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3051, Australia
| | - Shuai Li
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3051, Australia.
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK.
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3051, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hopper JL, Dowty JG, Nguyen TL, Li S, Dite GS, MacInnis RJ, Makalic E, Schmidt DF, Bui M, Stone J, Sung J, Jenkins MA, Giles GG, Southey MC, Mathews JD. Variance of age-specific log incidence decomposition (VALID): a unifying model of measured and unmeasured genetic and non-genetic risks. Int J Epidemiol 2023; 52:1557-1568. [PMID: 37349888 PMCID: PMC10655167 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyad086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The extent to which known and unknown factors explain how much people of the same age differ in disease risk is fundamental to epidemiology. Risk factors can be correlated in relatives, so familial aspects of risk (genetic and non-genetic) must be considered. DEVELOPMENT We present a unifying model (VALID) for variance in risk, with risk defined as log(incidence) or logit(cumulative incidence). Consider a normally distributed risk score with incidence increasing exponentially as the risk increases. VALID's building block is variance in risk, Δ2, where Δ = log(OPERA) is the difference in mean between cases and controls and OPERA is the odds ratio per standard deviation. A risk score correlated r between a pair of relatives generates a familial odds ratio of exp(rΔ2). Familial risk ratios, therefore, can be converted into variance components of risk, extending Fisher's classic decomposition of familial variation to binary traits. Under VALID, there is a natural upper limit to variance in risk caused by genetic factors, determined by the familial odds ratio for genetically identical twin pairs, but not to variation caused by non-genetic factors. APPLICATION For female breast cancer, VALID quantified how much variance in risk is explained-at different ages-by known and unknown major genes and polygenes, non-genomic risk factors correlated in relatives, and known individual-specific factors. CONCLUSION VALID has shown that, while substantial genetic risk factors have been discovered, much is unknown about genetic and familial aspects of breast cancer risk especially for young women, and little is known about individual-specific variance in risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - James G Dowty
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Tuong L Nguyen
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Shuai Li
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Gillian S Dite
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Genetic Technologies Ltd., Fitzroy, VIC, Australia
| | - Robert J MacInnis
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Enes Makalic
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Daniel F Schmidt
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Minh Bui
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jennifer Stone
- School of Population and Global Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Joohon Sung
- Division of Genome and Health Big Data, Department of Public Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mark A Jenkins
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Graham G Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - John D Mathews
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Watt GP, Thakran S, Sung JS, Jochelson MS, Lobbes MBI, Weinstein SP, Bradbury AR, Buys SS, Morris EA, Apte A, Patel P, Woods M, Liang X, Pike MC, Kontos D, Bernstein JL. Association of Breast Cancer Odds with Background Parenchymal Enhancement Quantified Using a Fully Automated Method at MRI: The IMAGINE Study. Radiology 2023; 308:e230367. [PMID: 37750771 PMCID: PMC10546291 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.230367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
Background Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) at breast MRI has been associated with increased breast cancer risk in several independent studies. However, variability of subjective BPE assessments have precluded its use in clinical practice. Purpose To examine the association between fully objective measures of BPE at MRI and odds of breast cancer. Materials and Methods This prospective case-control study included patients who underwent a bilateral breast MRI examination and were receiving care at one of three centers in the United States from November 2010 to July 2017. Breast volume, fibroglandular tissue (FGT) volume, and BPE were quantified using fully automated software. Fat volume was defined as breast volume minus FGT volume. BPE extent was defined as the proportion of FGT voxels with enhancement of 20% or more. Spearman rank correlation between quantitative BPE extent and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) BPE categories assigned by an experienced board-certified breast radiologist was estimated. With use of multivariable logistic regression, breast cancer case-control status was regressed on tertiles (low, moderate, and high) of BPE, FGT volume, and fat volume, with adjustment for covariates. Results In total, 536 case participants with breast cancer (median age, 48 years [IQR, 43-55 years]) and 940 cancer-free controls (median age, 46 years [IQR, 38-55 years]) were included. BPE extent was positively associated with BI-RADS BPE (rs = 0.54; P < .001). Compared with low BPE extent (range, 2.9%-34.2%), high BPE extent (range, 50.7%-97.3%) was associated with increased odds of breast cancer (odds ratio [OR], 1.74 [95% CI: 1.23, 2.46]; P for trend = .002) in a multivariable model also including FGT volume (OR, 1.39 [95% CI: 0.97, 1.98]) and fat volume (OR, 1.46 [95% CI: 1.04, 2.06]). The association of high BPE extent with increased odds of breast cancer was similar for premenopausal and postmenopausal women (ORs, 1.75 and 1.83, respectively; interaction P = .73). Conclusion Objectively measured BPE at breast MRI is associated with increased breast cancer odds for both premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Clinical trial registration no. NCT02301767 © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Bokacheva in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon P. Watt
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Snekha Thakran
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Janice S. Sung
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Maxine S. Jochelson
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Marc B. I. Lobbes
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Susan P. Weinstein
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Angela R. Bradbury
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Saundra S. Buys
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Elizabeth A. Morris
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Aditya Apte
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Prusha Patel
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Meghan Woods
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Xiaolin Liang
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Malcolm C. Pike
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Despina Kontos
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| | - Jonine L. Bernstein
- From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (G.P.W., P.P., M.W., X.L., M.C.P., J.L.B.), Department of Radiology (J.S.S., M.S.J.), and Department of Medical Physics (A.A.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065; Department of Radiology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (S.T., S.P.W., A.R.B., D.K.); Department of Medical Imaging, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (M.B.I.L.); Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah (S.S.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Davis, Calif (E.A.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li S, Nguyen TL, Nguyen-Dumont T, Dowty JG, Dite GS, Ye Z, Trinh HN, Evans CF, Tan M, Sung J, Jenkins MA, Giles GG, Hopper JL, Southey MC. Genetic Aspects of Mammographic Density Measures Associated with Breast Cancer Risk. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14112767. [PMID: 35681745 PMCID: PMC9179294 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Cumulus, Altocumulus, and Cirrocumulus are measures of mammographic density defined at increasing pixel brightness thresholds, which, when converted to mammogram risk scores (MRSs), predict breast cancer risk. Twin and family studies suggest substantial variance in the MRSs could be explained by genetic factors. For 2559 women aged 30 to 80 years (mean 54 years), we measured the MRSs from digitized film mammograms and estimated the associations of the MRSs with a 313-SNP breast cancer polygenic risk score (PRS) and 202 individual SNPs associated with breast cancer risk. The PRS was weakly positively correlated (correlation coefficients ranged 0.05−0.08; all p < 0.04) with all the MRSs except the Cumulus-white MRS based on the “white but not bright area” (correlation coefficient = 0.04; p = 0.06). After adjusting for its association with the Altocumulus MRS, the PRS was not associated with the Cumulus MRS. There were MRS associations (Bonferroni-adjusted p < 0.04) with one SNP in the ATXN1 gene and nominally with some ESR1 SNPs. Less than 1% of the variance of the MRSs is explained by the genetic markers currently known to be associated with breast cancer risk. Discovering the genetic determinants of the bright, not white, regions of the mammogram could reveal substantial new genetic causes of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuai Li
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3051, Australia; (S.L.); (T.L.N.); (J.G.D.); (G.S.D.); (Z.Y.); (H.N.T.); (C.F.E.); (M.A.J.); (G.G.G.)
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia; (T.N.-D.); (M.C.S.)
| | - Tuong L. Nguyen
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3051, Australia; (S.L.); (T.L.N.); (J.G.D.); (G.S.D.); (Z.Y.); (H.N.T.); (C.F.E.); (M.A.J.); (G.G.G.)
| | - Tu Nguyen-Dumont
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia; (T.N.-D.); (M.C.S.)
- Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3051, Australia
| | - James G. Dowty
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3051, Australia; (S.L.); (T.L.N.); (J.G.D.); (G.S.D.); (Z.Y.); (H.N.T.); (C.F.E.); (M.A.J.); (G.G.G.)
| | - Gillian S. Dite
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3051, Australia; (S.L.); (T.L.N.); (J.G.D.); (G.S.D.); (Z.Y.); (H.N.T.); (C.F.E.); (M.A.J.); (G.G.G.)
- Genetic Technologies Limited, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia
| | - Zhoufeng Ye
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3051, Australia; (S.L.); (T.L.N.); (J.G.D.); (G.S.D.); (Z.Y.); (H.N.T.); (C.F.E.); (M.A.J.); (G.G.G.)
| | - Ho N. Trinh
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3051, Australia; (S.L.); (T.L.N.); (J.G.D.); (G.S.D.); (Z.Y.); (H.N.T.); (C.F.E.); (M.A.J.); (G.G.G.)
| | - Christopher F. Evans
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3051, Australia; (S.L.); (T.L.N.); (J.G.D.); (G.S.D.); (Z.Y.); (H.N.T.); (C.F.E.); (M.A.J.); (G.G.G.)
| | - Maxine Tan
- Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering Discipline, School of Engineering, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway 47500, Malaysia;
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA
| | - Joohon Sung
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Genome and Health Big Data, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea;
| | - Mark A. Jenkins
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3051, Australia; (S.L.); (T.L.N.); (J.G.D.); (G.S.D.); (Z.Y.); (H.N.T.); (C.F.E.); (M.A.J.); (G.G.G.)
| | - Graham G. Giles
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3051, Australia; (S.L.); (T.L.N.); (J.G.D.); (G.S.D.); (Z.Y.); (H.N.T.); (C.F.E.); (M.A.J.); (G.G.G.)
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia; (T.N.-D.); (M.C.S.)
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - John L. Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3051, Australia; (S.L.); (T.L.N.); (J.G.D.); (G.S.D.); (Z.Y.); (H.N.T.); (C.F.E.); (M.A.J.); (G.G.G.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Melissa C. Southey
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia; (T.N.-D.); (M.C.S.)
- Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3051, Australia
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Southey MC, Dugué PA. Improving breast cancer risk prediction with epigenetic risk factors. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2022; 19:363-364. [PMID: 35351995 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-022-00622-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa C Southey
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia. .,Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. .,Department of Clinical Pathology, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Pierre-Antoine Dugué
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.,Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Familial Aspects of Mammographic Density Measures Associated with Breast Cancer Risk. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14061483. [PMID: 35326633 PMCID: PMC8946826 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Cumulus, Cumulus-percent, Altocumulus, Cirrocumulus, and Cumulus-white are mammogram risk scores (MRSs) that predict a woman’s risk of breast cancer based on mammographically dense areas when defined by different levels of brightness. We measured these MRS for 593 monozygotic (MZ) and 326 dizygotic (DZ) female twin pairs and 1592 of their sisters. We estimated how much these MRSs were correlated in relatives (ρ), how much of the differences between women were due to genetic factors (heritability), and how much these MRS explained why breast cancer runs in families. The ρ estimates ranged from: 0.41 to 0.60 for MZ pairs, 0.16 to 0.26 for DZ pairs, and 0.19 to 0.29 sister pairs, respectively. Heritability estimates were 36% to 69%. Genetic factors explain most of why twins and sisters are similar in their MRS, and these genetic factors explain one-quarter to one-half as much breast cancer risk as to the current best genetic risk score. Abstract Cumulus, Cumulus-percent, Altocumulus, Cirrocumulus, and Cumulus-white are mammogram risk scores (MRSs) for breast cancer based on mammographic density defined in effect by different levels of pixel brightness and adjusted for age and body mass index. We measured these MRS from digitized film mammograms for 593 monozygotic (MZ) and 326 dizygotic (DZ) female twin pairs and 1592 of their sisters. We estimated the correlations in relatives (r) and the proportion of variance due to genetic factors (heritability) using the software FISHER and predicted the familial risk ratio (FRR) associated with each MRS. The ρ estimates ranged from: 0.41 to 0.60 (standard error [SE] 0.02) for MZ pairs, 0.16 to 0.26 (SE 0.05) for DZ pairs, and 0.19 to 0.29 (SE 0.02) for sister pairs (including pairs of a twin and her non-twin sister), respectively. Heritability estimates were 39% to 69% under the classic twin model and 36% to 56% when allowing for shared non-genetic factors specific to MZ pairs. The FRRs were 1.08 to 1.17. These MRSs are substantially familial, due mostly to genetic factors that explain one-quarter to one-half as much of the familial aggregation of breast cancer that is explained by the current best polygenic risk score.
Collapse
|
9
|
Watt GP, Knight JA, Lin C, Lynch CF, Malone KE, John EM, Bernstein L, Brooks JD, Reiner AS, Liang X, Woods M, Nguyen TL, Hopper JL, Pike MC, Bernstein JL. Mammographic texture features associated with contralateral breast cancer in the WECARE Study. NPJ Breast Cancer 2021; 7:146. [PMID: 34845211 PMCID: PMC8630158 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00354-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
To evaluate whether mammographic texture features were associated with second primary contralateral breast cancer (CBC) risk, we created a "texture risk score" using pre-treatment mammograms in a case-control study of 212 women with CBC and 223 controls with unilateral breast cancer. The texture risk score was associated with CBC (odds per adjusted standard deviation = 1.25, 95% CI 1.01-1.56) after adjustment for mammographic percent density and confounders. These results support the potential of texture features for CBC risk assessment of breast cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon P. Watt
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Julia A. Knight
- grid.250674.20000 0004 0626 6184Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON Canada ,grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Division of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Christine Lin
- grid.240473.60000 0004 0543 9901Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA USA
| | - Charles F. Lynch
- grid.214572.70000 0004 1936 8294 Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA USA
| | - Kathleen E. Malone
- grid.270240.30000 0001 2180 1622Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA USA
| | - Esther M. John
- grid.168010.e0000000419368956Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA ,grid.168010.e0000000419368956Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA
| | - Leslie Bernstein
- grid.410425.60000 0004 0421 8357Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA USA
| | - Jennifer D. Brooks
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Division of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Anne S. Reiner
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Xiaolin Liang
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Meghan Woods
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Tuong L. Nguyen
- grid.1008.90000 0001 2179 088XMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC Australia
| | - John L. Hopper
- grid.1008.90000 0001 2179 088XMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC Australia
| | - Malcolm C. Pike
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| | - Jonine L. Bernstein
- grid.51462.340000 0001 2171 9952Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hopper JL, Nguyen TL. Towards risk-stratified population breast cancer screening: more than mammographic density. Med J Aust 2021; 215:350-351. [PMID: 34532866 DOI: 10.5694/mja2.51268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- John L Hopper
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
| | - Tuong Linh Nguyen
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Li SX, Milne RL, Nguyen-Dumont T, English DR, Giles GG, Southey MC, Antoniou AC, Lee A, Winship I, Hopper JL, Terry MB, MacInnis RJ. Prospective Evaluation over 15 Years of Six Breast Cancer Risk Models. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:5194. [PMID: 34680343 PMCID: PMC8534072 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13205194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2021] [Revised: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Prospective validation of risk models is needed to assess their clinical utility, particularly over the longer term. We evaluated the performance of six commonly used breast cancer risk models (IBIS, BOADICEA, BRCAPRO, BRCAPRO-BCRAT, BCRAT, and iCARE-lit). 15-year risk scores were estimated using lifestyle factors and family history measures from 7608 women in the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study who were aged 50-65 years and unaffected at commencement of follow-up two (conducted in 2003-2007), of whom 351 subsequently developed breast cancer. Risk discrimination was assessed using the C-statistic and calibration using the expected/observed number of incident cases across the spectrum of risk by age group (50-54, 55-59, 60-65 years) and family history of breast cancer. C-statistics were higher for BOADICEA (0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.62) and IBIS (0.57, 95% CI 0.54-0.61) than the other models (p-difference ≤ 0.04). No model except BOADICEA calibrated well across the spectrum of 15-year risk (p-value < 0.03). The performance of BOADICEA and IBIS was similar across age groups and for women with or without a family history. For middle-aged Australian women, BOADICEA and IBIS had the highest discriminatory accuracy of the six risk models, but apart from BOADICEA, no model was well-calibrated across the risk spectrum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherly X. Li
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne 3004, Australia; (S.X.L.); (R.L.M.); (D.R.E.); (G.G.G.); (M.C.S.)
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia;
- Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Roger L. Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne 3004, Australia; (S.X.L.); (R.L.M.); (D.R.E.); (G.G.G.); (M.C.S.)
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia;
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne 3800, Australia;
| | - Tú Nguyen-Dumont
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne 3800, Australia;
- Department of Clinical Pathology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia
| | - Dallas R. English
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne 3004, Australia; (S.X.L.); (R.L.M.); (D.R.E.); (G.G.G.); (M.C.S.)
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia;
| | - Graham G. Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne 3004, Australia; (S.X.L.); (R.L.M.); (D.R.E.); (G.G.G.); (M.C.S.)
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia;
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne 3800, Australia;
| | - Melissa C. Southey
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne 3004, Australia; (S.X.L.); (R.L.M.); (D.R.E.); (G.G.G.); (M.C.S.)
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne 3800, Australia;
- Department of Clinical Pathology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia
| | - Antonis C. Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK; (A.C.A.); (A.L.)
| | - Andrew Lee
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK; (A.C.A.); (A.L.)
| | - Ingrid Winship
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne 3050, Australia;
- Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3050, Australia
| | - John L. Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia;
| | - Mary Beth Terry
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA;
| | - Robert J. MacInnis
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne 3004, Australia; (S.X.L.); (R.L.M.); (D.R.E.); (G.G.G.); (M.C.S.)
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia;
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hopper JL, Nguyen TL, Li S. Blood DNA methylation score predicts breast cancer risk: applying OPERA in molecular, environmental, genetic and analytic epidemiology. Mol Oncol 2021; 16:8-10. [PMID: 34655510 PMCID: PMC8732348 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
In this issue, Kresovich and colleagues have published a hallmark paper in Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology. By applying artificial intelligence to the Sister Study they created a new methylation-based breast cancer risk score (mBCRS) based on blood DNA methylation. Using a prospective design and after accounting for age and questionnaire-based breast cancer risk factors, the Odds PER Adjusted standard deviation (OPERA) for mBCRS and polygenic risk score (PRS) was 1.58 (95% CI: 1.38, 1.81) and 1.58 (95% CI: 1.36, 1.83), respectively, and the corresponding area under the receiver operating curve was 0.63 for both. Therefore, mBCRS could be as powerful as the current best PRS in differentiating women of the same age in terms of their breast cancer risk. These risk scores are among the strongest known breast cancer risk-stratifiers, shaded only by new mammogram risk scores based on measures other than conventional mammographic density, such as Cirrocumulus and Cirrus, which when combined have an OPERA as high as 2.3. The combination of PRS and mBCRS with the other measured risk factors gave an OPERA of 2.2. OPERA has many advantages over changes in areas under the receiver operator curve because the latter depend on the order in which risk factors are considered. Although more replication is needed using prospective data to protect against reverse causation, there are many novel molecular and analytic aspects to this paper which uncovers a potential mechanism for how genetic and environmental factors combine to cause breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | - Tuong L Nguyen
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | - Shuai Li
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kresovich JK, Xu Z, O'Brien KM, Shi M, Weinberg CR, Sandler DP, Taylor JA. Blood DNA methylation profiles improve breast cancer prediction. Mol Oncol 2021; 16:42-53. [PMID: 34411412 PMCID: PMC8732352 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2020] [Revised: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Although blood DNA methylation (DNAm) profiles are reported to be associated with breast cancer incidence, they have not been widely used in breast cancer risk assessment. Among a breast cancer case–cohort of 2774 women (1551 cases) in the Sister Study, we used candidate CpGs and DNAm estimators of physiologic characteristics to derive a methylation‐based breast cancer risk score, mBCRS. Overall, 19 CpGs and five DNAm estimators were selected using elastic net regularization to comprise mBCRS. In a test set, higher mBCRS was positively associated with breast cancer incidence, showing similar strength to the polygenic risk score (PRS) based on 313 single nucleotide polymorphisms (313 SNPs). Area under the curve for breast cancer prediction was 0.60 for self‐reported risk factors (RFs), 0.63 for PRS, and 0.63 for mBCRS. Adding mBCRS to PRS and RFs improved breast cancer prediction from 0.66 to 0.71. mBCRS findings were replicated in a nested case–control study within the EPIC‐Italy cohort. These results suggest that mBCRS, a risk score derived using blood DNAm, can be used to enhance breast cancer prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob K Kresovich
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Zongli Xu
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Katie M O'Brien
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Min Shi
- Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Clarice R Weinberg
- Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Dale P Sandler
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Jack A Taylor
- Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.,Epigenetic and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hopper JL, Nguyen TL, Li S. RE: Chemopreventive Agents to Reduce Mammographic Breast Density in Premenopausal Women: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2021; 5:pkab051. [PMID: 34377932 PMCID: PMC8346692 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkab051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tuong L Nguyen
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Shuai Li
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|