Constitutive low expression of antiviral effectors sensitizes melanoma cells to a novel oncolytic virus

Nuclear Morphology-Based Assessment of Cell Fates Induced by a Microtubule Targeting Agent as a Single Treatment or Combined with an Oncolytic Virus

Immunofluorescence microscopy allows for the quantitative assessment of cell fate at single-cell resolution. This is required to analyze heterogeneous cell populations, as the assessment of average values of given parameters does not faithfully describe distinct states of specific subpopulations. As a case in point, we describe a methodology for characterizing the effects of a microtubule targeting agent, 2-methoxestradiol (2ME2), on T24 human bladder cancer cells. We employ an immunofluorescence-based assessment of nuclear morphology, DNA content, and the intracellular distribution pattern of microtubules for the identification/classification of cells undergoing mitosis or mitotic slippage. When combined with imaging-based identification of cells expressing a nonstructural oncolytic virus protein, this approach enables the assessment of the potential for combined treatment with a microtubule targeting agent and an oncolytic virus (e.g., the Epizootic Hemorrhagic Disease Virus-Tel Aviv University, EHDV-TAU).

Arrest and Attack: Microtubule-Targeting Agents and Oncolytic Viruses Employ Complementary Mechanisms to Enhance Anti-Tumor Therapy Efficacy

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are promising cancer immunotherapy agents that stimulate anti-tumor immunity through the preferential infection and killing of tumor cells. OVs are currently under limited clinical usage, due in part to their restricted efficacy as monotherapies. Current efforts for enhancement of the therapeutic potency of OVs involve their combination with other therapy modalities, aiming at the concomitant exploitation of complementary tumor weaknesses. In this context, microtubule-targeting agents (MTAs) pose as an enticing option, as they perturb microtubule dynamics and function, induce cell-cycle arrest, and cause mitotic cell death. MTAs induce therapeutic benefit through cancer-cell-autonomous and non-cell-autonomous mechanisms and are a main component of the standard of care for different malignancies. However, off-target effects and acquired resistance involving distinct cellular and molecular mechanisms may limit the overall efficacy of MTA-based therapy. When combined, OVs and MTAs may enhance therapeutic efficacy through increases in OV infection and immunogenic cell death and a decreased probability of acquired resistance. In this review, we introduce OVs and MTAs, describe molecular features of their activity in cancer cells, and discuss studies and clinical trials in which the combination has been tested.

Integrating innate and adaptive immunity in oncolytic virus therapy

Oncolytic viruses (OVs), viruses engineered to lyse tumor cells, work hand in hand with the immune response. While for decades the field isolated lytic capability and viral spread to increase response to virotherapy, there is now a wealth of research that demonstrates the importance of immunity in the OV mechanism of action. In this review, we will cover how OVs interact with the innate immune system to fully activate the adaptive immune system and yield exceptional tumor clearances as well as look forward at combination therapies which can improve clinical responses.

Lipocalin-2 regulates the expression of interferon-stimulated genes and the susceptibility of prostate cancer cells to oncolytic virus infection

Lipocalin-2 (LCN2) performs pleiotropic and tumor context-dependent functions in cancers of diverse etiologies. In prostate cancer (PCa) cells, LCN2 regulates distinct phenotypic features, including cytoskeleton organization and expression of inflammation mediators. Oncolytic virotherapy uses oncolytic viruses (OVs) to kill cancer cells and induce anti-tumor immunity. A main source of specificity of OVs towards tumor cells stems from cancer-induced defects in interferon (IFN)-based cell autonomous immune responses. However, the molecular underpinnings of such defects in PCa cells are only partially understood. Moreover, LCN2 effects on IFN responses of PCa cells and their susceptibility to OVs are unknown. To examine these issues, we queried gene expression databases for genes coexpressed with LCN2, revealing co-expression of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) and LCN2. Analysis of human PCa cells revealed correlated expression of LCN2 and subsets of IFNs and ISGs. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated stable knockout of LCN2 in PC3 cells or transient overexpression of LCN2 in LNCaP cells revealed LCN2-mediated regulation of IFNE (and IFNL1) expression, activation of JAK/STAT pathway, and expression of selected ISGs. Accordingly, and dependent on a functional JAK/STAT pathway, LCN2 reduced the susceptibility of PCa cells to infection with the IFN-sensitive OV, EHDV-TAU. In PC3 cells, LCN2 knockout increased phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (p-eIF2α). Inhibition of PKR-like ER kinase (PERK) in PC3-LCN2-KO cells reduced p-eIF2α while increasing constitutive IFNE expression, phosphorylation of STAT1, and ISG expression; and decreasing EHDV-TAU infection. Together, these data propose that LCN2 regulates PCa susceptibility to OVs through attenuation of PERK activity and increased IFN and ISG expression.

Engineering strategies to enhance oncolytic viruses in cancer immunotherapy

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are emerging as potentially useful platforms in treatment methods for patients with tumors. They preferentially target and kill tumor cells, leaving healthy cells unharmed. In addition to direct oncolysis, the essential and attractive aspect of oncolytic virotherapy is based on the intrinsic induction of both innate and adaptive immune responses. To further augment this efficacious response, OVs have been genetically engineered to express immune regulators that enhance or restore antitumor immunity. Recently, combinations of OVs with other immunotherapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), chimeric antigen receptors (CARs), antigen-specific T-cell receptors (TCRs) and autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), have led to promising progress in cancer treatment. This review summarizes the intrinsic mechanisms of OVs, describes the optimization strategies for using armed OVs to enhance the effects of antitumor immunity and highlights rational combinations of OVs with other immunotherapies in recent preclinical and clinical studies.

Oncolytic Virotherapy: The Cancer Cell Side

Simple Summary

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are a promising immunotherapy that specifically target and kill cancer cells and stimulate anti-tumor immunity. While different OVs are endowed with distinct features, which enhance their specificity towards tumor cells; attributes of the cancer cell also critically contribute to this specificity. Such features comprise defects in innate immunity, including antiviral responses, and the metabolic reprogramming of the malignant cell. The tumorigenic features which support OV replication can be intrinsic to the transformation process (e.g., a direct consequence of the activity of a given oncogene), or acquired in the course of tumor immunoediting—the selection process applied by antitumor immunity. Oncogene-induced epigenetic silencing plays an important role in negative regulation of immunostimulatory antiviral responses in the cancer cells. Reversal of such silencing may also provide a strong immunostimulant in the form of viral mimicry by activation of endogenous retroelements. Here we review features of the cancer cell that support viral replication, tumor immunoediting and the connection between oncogenic signaling, DNA methylation and viral oncolysis. As such, this review concentrates on the malignant cell, while detailed description of different OVs can be found in the accompanied reviews of this issue.

Abstract

Cell autonomous immunity genes mediate the multiple stages of anti-viral defenses, including recognition of invading pathogens, inhibition of viral replication, reprogramming of cellular metabolism, programmed-cell-death, paracrine induction of antiviral state, and activation of immunostimulatory inflammation. In tumor development and/or immunotherapy settings, selective pressure applied by the immune system results in tumor immunoediting, a reduction in the immunostimulatory potential of the cancer cell. This editing process comprises the reduced expression and/or function of cell autonomous immunity genes, allowing for immune-evasion of the tumor while concomitantly attenuating anti-viral defenses. Combined with the oncogene-enhanced anabolic nature of cancer-cell metabolism, this attenuation of antiviral defenses contributes to viral replication and to the selectivity of oncolytic viruses (OVs) towards malignant cells. Here, we review the manners by which oncogene-mediated transformation and tumor immunoediting combine to alter the intracellular milieu of tumor cells, for the benefit of OV replication. We also explore the functional connection between oncogenic signaling and epigenetic silencing, and the way by which restriction of such silencing results in immune activation. Together, the picture that emerges is one in which OVs and epigenetic modifiers are part of a growing therapeutic toolbox that employs activation of anti-tumor immunity for cancer therapy.