Contemporary hormonal contraception and cervical cancer in women of reproductive age

Socioeconomic position and risk of cervical cancer in the Nordic countries: Results from the Nordic Occupational Cancer Study

The Nordic countries benefited from declines in cervical cancer incidence rates due to the implementation of screening programmes. However, it is unclear whether all social groups have equally benefited from these preventive services. We provide an assessment of the temporal trends in cervical cancer incidence by socioeconomic position (SEP) in Denmark, Norway, Finland and Sweden, using data from the Nordic Occupational Cancer Study. Truncated age-standardized incidence rates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of cervical cancer per 100,000 person-years were computed for women aged 50-69 by SEP and country within the period 1961-2005. We used Poisson regression models to compute relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs of cervical cancer across SEP, pooling data for the three most recent 5-year periods (except for Denmark 1991-1995 and Norway 1991-2003). Throughout the study period, declines in the rates of cervical cancer were observed among all SEP groups. Lower SEP rates, which started from higher values, declined faster than those for higher SEP. At the conclusion of the study period, we still observed a social gradient, with higher rates seen in lower SEP women. Farmers had the lowest risk in all four countries. The RRs for lowest versus highest SEP ranged from 1.33 (95% CI 1.05-1.69) in Sweden to 1.76 (95% CI 1.13-2.85) in Denmark, with a pooled RR of 1.41 (95% CI 1.22-1.64). Lower SEP women still face the highest risks, indicating a need for continued efforts to provide equitable access to preventive services.

The role of co-infections and hormonal contraceptives in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia prevalence among women referred to a tertiary hospital in Western Kenya

BACKGROUND

Screening for co-infections with HIV, HSV-2 and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) among high-risk human papilloma virus (hr-HPV) positive women, coupled with enhanced counseling on contraceptives use remains essential in alleviating high morbidity of cervical cancer (CC). The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) among women referred for CC screening at a referral hospital in Kisumu County, Kenya; and to establish the role of co-infection and hormonal contraceptives on CIN.

METHOD

In a cross-sectional study, we collected HPV, HIV, HSV-2 and CT data, cervical cytology results, and demographic information from 517 referrals. Blood samples were obtained for HIV and HSV-2 tests; urine for CT test, cervical swabs for hr-HPV test and colposcopic biopsy for histology confirmation after visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA).

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of CIN was 18.4% (95/517) with CIN1 observed in 56(29.6%), CIN2 in 27(`14.3%), CIN3 and above (CIN3+) in 12(6.3%) and normal biopsy in 94(49.7%) of the patients out of which high grade CIN2 and above (CIN2+) was 7.54% (39/517) equivalent to 32.5 per 100,000 women per year. In a univariate analysis; HPV/HIV co-infection (infected vs. uninfected: OR 2.79; 95% CI 1.56-5.10, p < 0.001); HPV/HSV-2 co-infection (infected vs. uninfected: OR 2.41; 95% CI: 1.12-5.46, p < 0.024); HPV/CT co-infection (infected vs. uninfected: OR 3.83; 95% CI 1.84-8.51, p < 0.001) were found to be significantly associated with CIN. Additionally, hormone-containing intra uterine device (HIUD) contraceptives (users vs. none users: OR 1.43; 95% CI 0.28-10.9, p < 0.017) were also associated with CIN.

CONCLUSION

Co-infections with HIV, HSV-2 or Chlamydia trachomatis and use of HIUD were associated with increased risk of testing positive for CIN in HPV positive women. Although the overall prevalence of CIN was high, high-grade CIN2 + was comparable to the rates reported earlier. Therefore, population screening for co-infections alongside hr-HPV is desirable and is likely to reduce the burden of CIN in the region. Besides, women positive for hr-HPV and opting for contraceptives ought to be counseled about the possible positive and negative side-effects of different contraception options.

Common myths and misconceptions surrounding hormonal contraception

Numerous community and professional myths and misconceptions around hormonal contraception exist, many promulgated through social media. As a result of these and other factors, people are moving away from hormonal methods and potentially exposing themselves to increased risk of unintended pregnancy. A number of key myths and misconceptions have been identified in a range of papers and here we summarise the evidence around the basis for these misunderstandings. The themes we explore are the physical side effects, the mental health effects, the impact on sexuality, the concerns about infertility, the concept of "unnaturalness", concerns about menstruation, concerns about safety and destigmatisation of side effects. For many of these themes, there is some evidence justifying the concern, but overall for most people, we argue that the benefits of hormonal contraception outweigh the disadvantages.

Long-acting, progestin-based contraceptives and risk of breast, gynecological, and other cancers

BACKGROUND

Use of long-acting, reversible contraceptives has increased over the past 20 years, but an understanding of how they could influence cancer risk is limited.

METHODS

We conducted a nested case-control study among a national cohort of Australian women (n = 176 601 diagnosed with cancer between 2004 and 2013; 882 999 matched control individuals) to investigate the associations between the levonorgestrel intrauterine system, etonogestrel implants, depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate and cancer risk and compared these results with the oral contraceptive pill. We used conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Levonorgestrel intrauterine system and etonogestrel implant use was associated with breast cancer risk (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.21 to 1.31, and OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.17 to 1.32, respectively), but depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate was not, except when used for 5 or more years (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 0.95 to 1.59). Reduced risks were seen for levonorgestrel intrauterine system (≥1 years of use) in endometrial cancer (OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.99), ovarian cancer (OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.57 to 0.88), and cervical cancer (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.51 to 0.75); for etonogestrel implant in endometrial cancer (OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.13 to 0.34) and ovarian cancer (OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.57 to 1.02); and for depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate in endometrial cancer (OR = 0.21, 95% CI = 0.13 to 0.34). Although levonorgestrel intrauterine system, etonogestrel implant and depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate were all associated with increased cancer risk overall, for etonogestrel implant, the risk returned to baseline after cessation, similar to the oral contraceptive pill. We were unable to adjust for all potential confounders, but sensitivity analyses suggested that adjusting for parity, smoking, and obesity would not have materially changed our findings.

CONCLUSION

Long-acting, reversible contraceptives have similar cancer associations to the oral contraceptive pill (reduced endometrial and ovarian cancer risks and short-term increased breast cancer risk). This information may be helpful to women and their physicians when discussing contraception options.

Assessing the impact of contraceptive use on reproductive cancer risk among women of reproductive age-a systematic review

Background

Contraceptives play a crucial role in women's reproductive health, their hormonal components may be linked to cancer risks, specifically breast, and gynecological cancers. Given the high usage rates of hormonal contraceptives, it is vital to systematically evaluate their potential impact on cancer outcomes, especially among women with a family history of gynecological cancers.

Objectives

This study aims to evaluate the evidence on the association between modern contraceptive use and the risk of breast and reproductive cancers (ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer) among women of reproductive age, to inform healthcare providers, women, and program managers about cancer outcomes related to contraceptive use.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Searches were performed in databases such as CINAHL, OVID Medline, EMBASE, and more from inception to February 2022. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies that compared cancer outcomes between contraceptive users and non-users. Data extraction, quality assessment, and meta-analyses were conducted following predefined protocols. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses examined variations in contraceptive methods, doses, and duration.

Results

A total of 51 studies were included, comprising 2 RCTs and 49 observational studies. The review identified a significant reduction in ovarian and endometrial cancer incidence among contraceptive users. Hormonal contraceptive users had a 36% lower risk of ovarian cancer (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.60-0.68), with specific reductions seen in combined oral contraceptive users (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.57-0.68) and hormonal IUD users (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.96). The rate ratio of cervical cancer was higher among non- users compared to hormonal contraceptive users when we pooled the results (1.28, 95% CI 1.21, 1.35). No significant association was found between contraceptive use and breast cancer risk among healthy women (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.94-1.06). However, BRCA1/2 mutation carriers using oral contraceptives showed a heightened risk of breast cancer (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.15-1.67).

Conclusion

This systematic review highlights the protective effects of modern contraceptives against ovarian and endometrial cancers while identifying an increased risk of cervical. No significant breast cancer risk was found for healthy women, but BRCA1/2 mutation carriers faced increased risks. These findings underscore the need for personalized contraceptive counselling that considers cancer risk factors. Further research is needed to explore contraceptive impacts across different genetic profiles and dosing regimens.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, Prospero (CRD42022332647).

Prevalence of cervical intraepithelial lesions and associated factors among women attending a cervical cancer clinic in Western Uganda; results based on Pap smear cytology

Introduction

There are high incidence and mortality rates of cervical cancer among females in East Africa. This is exacerbated by limited up-to-date data on premalignant lesions and associated factors in this setting. In this study, we determined the prevalence of cervical intraepithelial lesions and associated factors among women attending the Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital cervical cancer clinic in Southwestern Uganda.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 364 participants were recruited from among women attending the Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital cervical cancer clinic from 1 April to 30 June 2023. On consent, the study nurse collected demographic data and Pap smears, which were microscopically examined and reported by a laboratory scientist and a pathologist following the Bethesda grading system (2014). Statistical analyses were done in STATA version 17, using proportions, Chi-square, bivariate, and multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine associated factors at ⩽0.05 significance level.

Results

The mean age of participants was 41.9 years. A third of all study participants (37.6%, 132/351) were contraceptive users, mostly hormonal contraceptives (87.1%, 115/132). Almost 88% (307/351) had an unknown Human Papilloma Virus status. The prevalence of cervical intraepithelial lesions among our study participants was 6.6% (23/351), of which 73.9% (17/23) were low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. More than half (9/17, 52.9%) of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions were active hormonal contraceptive users. Use of hormonal contraceptives (OR: 3.032, p: 0.0253), use of intrauterine devices (OR: 6.284, p: 0.039), and any family history of cervical cancer (OR: 4.144, p: 0.049) were significantly associated with cervical intraepithelial lesions.

Conclusion

The prevalence of cervical intraepithelial lesions was 6.6%, lower than global estimates. Use of hormonal and intrauterine device contraceptives, as well as family history of cervical cancer, were significantly associated with cervical intraepithelial lesions among our study population. Prospective studies are recommended to further understand associations between different types of intrauterine devices and hormonal contraceptives, and cervical lesions.

Cervical cancer risk in association with TNF-alpha gene polymorphisms in Bangladeshi women

BACKGROUND

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) is among the vital pro-inflammatory cytokines that potentially exerts a significant influence on the immune response, hence potentially regulating the advancement of cervical lesions.

OBJECTIVE

Our study objective was to examine the relationship between two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs1799724 and rs1800629) of TNF-α and the risk of cervical cancer in women from Bangladesh.

METHODS

We recruited 133 patients with cervical cancer and 126 healthy individuals for this study. Genotyping was performed using real-time PCR SNP genotyping assay. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the odds ratio (OR) along with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p-values.

RESULTS

For rs1799724 (C > T) polymorphism, TT mutant homozygous genotype carried 3.26 times increased risk of developing cervical cancer (OR = 3.26, 95% CI = 1.15-9.28, p = 0.027). Polymorphism of rs1800629 (G > A) was also related to an elevated risk of cervical cancer. Individuals with the AG heterozygous genotype (OR = 2.85, 95% CI = 1.20-6.74, p = 0.017) and AA mutant homozygous genotype (OR = 4.55, 95% CI = 1.24-16.60, p = 0.022) also had a higher likelihood of having cervical cancer. Moreover, we found that injectable contraceptives increase the risk of cervical cancer. Individuals who smoked and/or had first-degree relatives with cancer were more likely to carry the risk allele, which increases the likelihood of developing cervical cancer.

CONCLUSION

TNF-α polymorphisms in rs1799724 and rs1800629 increase the susceptibility of developing cervical cancer in women from Bangladesh.

Combined oral contraceptives: update recommendations of the Latin American contraceptive association

Background: In recent years, new combined oral contraceptives (COCs) have become available, representing an advance in terms of individualization and compliance by users.Objective: To provide recommendations regarding COCs: formulations, use, efficacy, benefits and safety.Method: For these recommendations, we have used the modified Delphi methodology and carried out a systematic review of studies found in the literature and reviews performed in humans, published in English and Spanish in Pubmed, Medline and advanced medicine and computer networks until the year 2021, using the combination of terms: 'oral contraceptives', 'estroprogestins' and 'combined oral contraceptives'.Results: Regarding the estrogen component, initially switching from mestranol (the pro-drug of ethinylestradiol) to ethinylestradiol (EE) and then reducing the EE dose helped reduce side effects and associated adverse events. Natural estradiol and estradiol valerate are already available and represent a valid alternative to EE. The use of more potent 19-nortestosterone-derived progestins, in order to lower the dose and then the appearance of non-androgenic progestins with different endocrine and metabolic characteristics, has made it possible to individualize the prescription of COC according to the profile of each woman.Conclusion: Advances in the provision of new COCs have improved the risk/benefit ratio by increasing benefits and reducing risks. Currently, the challenge is to tailor contraceptives to individual needs in terms of safety, efficacy, and protection of female reproductive health.

MicroRNA expression associated with low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia outcomes

PURPOSE

Only a fraction of low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) progresses to high-grade CIN; however, the biological processes that differentiate progressive CIN from CIN that resolves naturally are poorly understood. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are important epigenetic regulators of gene expression and thus, miRNA expression profiling can reveal the dysregulated biology underlying disease processes. The purpose of this case-control study was to reveal miRNA expression patterns and predict the underlying biological pathways that are associated with clinical outcomes of low-grade CIN.

METHODS

Women with low-grade CIN diagnosis and definitive clinical outcomes (n = 51) were identified retrospectively using electronic clinical records. Comprehensive miRNA expression profiling was performed on the low-grade CIN diagnostic cervical biopsies retrieved from pathology archives. Differential miRNA expression was analyzed by comparing women with CIN that progressed to women with CIN that resolved naturally.

RESULTS

Differential expression of 29 miRNAs was observed in low-grade CIN that progressed to high-grade compared to low-grade CIN that resolved. Of these, 24 were significantly downregulated in progressive CIN, including miR-638, miR-3196, miR-4488, and miR-4508, while 5 miRNAs, including miR-1206a, were significantly upregulated. Computational gene ontology analysis based on the discovered miRNAs and their putative mRNA targets revealed biological processes associated with oncogenic phenotypes.

CONCLUSION

Distinct miRNA expression profiles are associated with clinical outcomes of low-grade CIN. The functional effects of the differentially expressed miRNAs may be biological determinants of CIN progression or resolution.

Women's health, hormonal balance, and personal autonomy

Hormone-based contraception disrupts hormonal balance, creating artificial states of anovulation and threatening women's health. We reviewed its main adverse effects and mechanisms on accelerated ovarian aging, mental health (emotional disruptions, depression, and suicide), sexuality (reduced libido), cardiovascular (brain stroke, myocardial infarction, hypertension, and thrombosis), and oncological (breast, cervical, and endometrial cancers). Other "collateral damage" includes negative effects on communication, scientific mistrust, poor physician-patient relationships, increased patient burden, economic drain on the healthcare system, and environmental pollution. Hormone-sensitive tumors present a dilemma owing to their potential dual effects: preventing some cancers vs. higher risk for others remains controversial, with denial or dismissal as non-relevant adverse effects, information avoidance, and modification of scientific criteria. This lack of clinical assessment poses challenges to women's health and their right to autonomy. Overcoming these challenges requires an anthropological integration of sexuality, as the focus on genital bodily union alone fails to encompass the intimate relational expression of individuals, complete sexual satisfaction, and the intertwined feelings of trust, safety, tenderness, and endorsement of women's femininity.

Implications of viral infections and oncogenesis in uterine cervical carcinoma etiology and pathogenesis

Background

Uterine Cervical Carcinoma (UCC) is the most prevalent gynecological malignancy globally, with a rising incidence in recent years. Accumulating evidence indicates that specific viral infections, including human papillomavirus (HPV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), Hepatitis B and C viruses (HBV and HCV), and human herpesvirus (HHV), may contribute to UCC development and progression. Understanding the complex interplay between viral infections and UCC risk is crucial for developing novel preventative and therapeutic interventions.

Methods

This comprehensive review investigates the association between viral infections and UCC risk by examining the roles of various viral pathogens in UCC etiology and pathogenesis, and possible molecular mechanisms. Additionally, we evaluate current diagnostic methods and potential therapeutic strategies targeting viral infections for UCC prevention or treatment.

Results

The prevention of UCC has been significantly advanced by the emergence of self-sampling for HPV testing as a crucial tool, allowing for early detection and intervention. However, an essential challenge in UCC prevention lies in understanding how HPV and other viral coinfections, including EBV, HBV, HCV, HHV, HIV, or their concurrent presence, may potentially contribute to UCC development. The molecular mechanisms implicated in the association between viral infections and cervical cancer development include: (1) interference of viral oncogenes with cellular regulatory proteins, resulting in uncontrolled cell proliferation and malignant transformation; (2) inactivation of tumor suppressor genes by viral proteins; (3) evasion of host immune responses by viruses; (4) induction of a persistent inflammatory response, contributing to a tumor-promoting microenvironment; (5) epigenetic modifications that lead to aberrant gene expression; (6) stimulation of angiogenesis by viruses; and (7) activation of telomerase by viral proteins, leading to cellular immortalization. Additionally, viral coinfections can also enhance oncogenic potential through synergistic interactions between viral oncoproteins, employ immune evasion strategies, contribute to chronic inflammation, modulate host cellular signaling pathways, and induce epigenetic alterations, ultimately leading to cervical carcinogenesis.

Conclusion

Recognizing the implications of viral oncogenes in UCC etiology and pathogenesis is vital for addressing the escalating burden of UCC. Developing innovative preventative and therapeutic interventions requires a thorough understanding of the intricate relationship between viral infections and UCC risk.

Extraterrestrial Gynecology: Could Spaceflight Increase the Risk of Developing Cancer in Female Astronauts? An Updated Review

Outer space is an extremely hostile environment for human life, with ionizing radiation from galactic cosmic rays and microgravity posing the most significant hazards to the health of astronauts. Spaceflight has also been shown to have an impact on established cancer hallmarks, possibly increasing carcinogenic risk. Terrestrially, women have a higher incidence of radiation-induced cancers, largely driven by lung, thyroid, breast, and ovarian cancers, and therefore, historically, they have been permitted to spend significantly less time in space than men. In the present review, we focus on the effects of microgravity and radiation on the female reproductive system, particularly gynecological cancer. The aim is to provide a summary of the research that has been carried out related to the risk of gynecological cancer, highlighting what further studies are needed to pave the way for safer exploration class missions, as well as postflight screening and management of women astronauts following long-duration spaceflight.

GSTT1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms with human papillomavirus infection in women from southern Brazil: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Important risk factors for the most common sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the world, human papillomavirus (HPV), include early sexual activity, use of contraceptives, tobacco smoking, and immunological and genetic factors. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms and HPV infection and associated risk factors in a group of women assisted in the public health system of southwestern Paraná, Brazil.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A case-control study was designed with 21 women with HPV matched by age in the case group and 84 women without the virus in the control group. Viral detection was conducted via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotyping by Multiplex PCR. The results showed that the GSTT1 null allele was a protective factor against infection (ORadj 0.219; 95% CI 0.078-0.618; p = 0.004). No relationship was observed for the GSTM1 gene. Smoking was defined as a risk factor (ORadj 3.678; 95% CI 1.111-12.171; p = 0.033), increasing the chances of HPV by up to 3.6 times.

CONCLUSION

This study showed, for the first time, the relationship between GSTM1 and GSTT1 genetic polymorphisms and HPV. We found that this relationship protected women from southern Brazil from viral infection, but not from susceptibility.

Hormonal Therapy for Gynecological Cancers: How Far Has Science Progressed toward Clinical Applications?

In recent years, hormone therapy has been shown to be a remarkable treatment option for cancer. Hormone treatment for gynecological cancers involves the use of medications that reduce the level of hormones or inhibit their biological activity, thereby stopping or slowing cancer growth. Hormone treatment works by preventing hormones from causing cancer cells to multiply. Aromatase inhibitors, anti-estrogens, progestin, estrogen receptor (ER) antagonists, GnRH agonists, and progestogen are effectively used as therapeutics for vulvar cancer, cervical cancer, vaginal cancer, uterine cancer, and ovarian cancer. Hormone replacement therapy has a high success rate. In particular, progestogen and estrogen replacement are associated with a decreased incidence of gynecological cancers in women infected with human papillomavirus (HPV). The activation of estrogen via the transcriptional functionality of ERα may either be promoted or decreased by gene products of HPV. Hormonal treatment is frequently administered to patients with hormone-sensitive recurring or metastatic gynecologic malignancies, although response rates and therapeutic outcomes are inconsistent. Therefore, this review outlines the use of hormonal therapy for gynecological cancers and identifies the current knowledge gaps.

[The risk-benefit balance of estrogen-progestogen hormonal contraception]

Combined hormonal contraception (CHC) remains the most widely used contraceptive strategy, particularly in France. While the benefit-risk balance is very beneficial for the majority of women, its use must be cautious in some clinical situations and in particular in women at vascular risk. It is therefore essential to provide information on all the vascular risk factors before prescribing any CHC, regardless of their route of administration. From an oncological point of view, if the use of CHCs is associated with a slight increase in the risk of breast cancer, their potential benefits persist for many years after their discontinuation for the risk of ovarian and endometrial cancer. These benefits counteract largely the risk of breast cancer. Finally, CHCs provide non-contraceptive benefits, especially in clinical situations such as dysmenorrhea or severe endometriosis. Therefore, it is necessary to precisely assess the clinical context of each woman in order to adapt the best contraceptive strategy.