High-risk human papillomavirus infection clearance following conization among patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasm grade 3 aged at least 45 years

Diagnostic Value of Vaginal Microecology, Serum miR-18a, and PD-L1 for Identifying HPV-Positive Cervical Cancer

Objective:

We aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of the vaginal microecology, serum miR-18a, and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) for human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive cervical cancer.

Methods:

Eighty-four patients with HPV-positive cervical cancer were assigned to the observation group, 107 HPV-positive patients without cervical cancer were assigned to the positive group, and 191 healthy women were assigned to the control group. Vaginal microecology and serum levels of miR-18a and PD-L1 on the surface of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells were compared among the 3 groups. The observation group was further divided into subgroups according to patients’ characteristics for comparison. The diagnostic value of miR-18a and PD-L1 for HPV-positive cervical cancer was investigated.

Results:

Women in the control group had better vaginal microecology and lower levels of miR-18a and PD-L1 than those in the observation and the positive groups (all P < 0.05). Compared with the positive group, the observation group had similar vaginal microecology (all P > 0.05) but higher levels of miR-18a and PD-L1 (all P < 0.05). Moreover, the patients at stage III had higher levels of miR-18a and PD-L1 than those at stage I and II (all P < 0.05). The values of area under the curve for miR-18a and PD-L1 in the diagnosis of HPV-positive cervical cancer were over 0.8 (all P < 0.001).

Conclusion:

Patients with HPV-positive cervical cancer have vaginal microbial dysbiosis and high serum levels of miR-18a and PD-L1. miR-18a and PD-L1 have diagnostic value for identifying HPV-positive cervical cancer.

[Recurrences of precancerous lesions after conservative treatment: Operational results after a decade in Abidjan]

OBJECTIVES

There remains a significant risk of recurrence of intraepithelial neoplasia regardless of the type of conservative treatment. The aim's work is to assess this rate.

METHODS

All women's consenting who had received conservative treatment at the sites identified since for more than 12 months were included in this multicenter cross-sectional study. The outcome measure was a recurrence of precancerous lesions of the cervix during visual inspection with acetic acid performed by a single practitioner to limit interobserver variability. Data collection and analysis were done on the Stata 13 software. We performed an univariate then multivariate analysis with logistic regression.

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventy-nine participated in this study with an average age of 37.44 (σ=7.31 years). A total of 52.33% were HIV positive. Moreover, 63.44% were treated by cryotherapy versus 36.66% by loop electrosurgical excision procedure. The overall prevalence of recurrences was 8.96%. Multivariate analysis with logistic regression concluded that the risk of recurrence was 5.72 times (OR=1.69-19.29; P=0.005) higher with cryotherapy and 2.85 times higher (OR=1.04-7.82; P=0.042) in women with HIV.

CONCLUSION

The risk of recurrence is proportionally high with cryotherapy and HIV status. This suggests that an adaptation of the strict monitoring protocols to our African context due to the lack of cytocolposcopic logistical resources.

Expression of geminin, p16, and Ki67 in cervical intraepithelial neoplasm and normal tissues

Geminin is a protein involved in cell cycle progression. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of geminin expression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasm (CIN).The expression of geminin, p16, and Ki67 was examined in 95 samples, including CIN1 (n = 45), CIN2/3 (n = 40), and normal cervical tissues (n = 10) by immunohistochemistry. The correlation between geminin or p16 expression and human papillomavirus (HPV) status was also evaluated.Geminin expression was negative in all normal tissues and expressed in 13.3% of CIN1 and 90.0% of CIN2/3. P16 expression was demonstrated in 24.4% of CIN1 and 87.5% of CIN2/3. The corresponding Ki67 expression was 35.6% and 95.0%. The specificity of geminin for differentiating between CIN1 and CIN2/3 was 86.7%, while for p16 and Ki67 the corresponding values were 75.6% and 64.4%. The sensitivity of geminin, p16, and Ki67 was 90.0%, 87.5%, and 95.0%, respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) and accuracy of geminin were higher than p16 and Ki67. In addition, geminin expression showed a weak correlation with HPV status, but there was no association between p16 expression and HPV status.These results suggested that geminin had a high degree of sensitivity and specificity in determining CIN2/3. In addition to p16 and Ki67, geminin might be used as a new biomarker to distinguish between CIN1 and CIN2/3.