Misoprostol use for second-trimester termination of pregnancy among women with one or more previous cesarean deliveries

Induced Abortion After Previous Caesarean Section: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Previous caesarean section (CS) is increasingly common among women undergoing induced abortion.

AIMS

To map and analyse existing literature on abortion safety, outcomes and management in those with previous CS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four databases were systematically searched from inception to July 2024. Primary human studies in English reporting on outcomes, safety or management of first- or second-trimester medical (MToP) or surgical (SToP) abortion in women with previous CS were included. Uterine rupture incidence was analysed cumulatively in the first and secondtrimesters by the number of CS and the type of prostaglandin used. Data on the efficacy and safety of MToP and SToP, including studies reporting on the management of abortion in the setting of abnormal placentation, were collected and analysed by theme.

RESULTS

In total, 164 articles met inclusion criteria. Incidence of uterine rupture in first-trimester MToP was 0 of 2194 cases, in second-trimester misoprostol MToP in those with 1 previous CS was 0.5% (10/1910) and 2.2% (18/835) in women with ≥ 2 CS (p < 0.001). Mifepristone priming did not increase the rupture rate in second-trimester MToP (p = 0.77). Previous CS was a modest risk factor for retained products after MToP across both trimesters (OR 1.48, CI 1.29-1.70).

CONCLUSION

Medical and surgical abortion in the first and second trimester appears safe in women with prior CS; however, risks include uterine rupture, need for surgical intervention and haemorrhage from undiagnosed placenta accreta. Further research and guidance are needed on managing abortion after previous classical CS, ≥ 3 previous CS and those with abnormally invasive placenta.

Uterine rupture following prostaglandins use in second trimester medical abortion: Fact or fiction? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Prostaglandins (PGs) have emerged as key drugs in second trimester medical abortion (STMA) and are currently a cornerstone in obstetric practice. Nevertheless, the application of PGs, integral to labor and abortion procedures, is not risk-free, and has been associated with several complications, particularly maternal fever and uterine rupture (UR).

OBJECTIVES

The main outcome of the present systematic review was to assess the safety of PGs use in STMA, particularly in scarred uterus (SC).

SEARCH STRATEGY

The review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. We performed a comprehensive systematic review by searching multiple databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, The Cochrane Library, Health Technology Assessment Database, and the research registers of Web of Science during the years 1990-2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Only articles regarding cases of UR occurred after the use of PGs for STMA were included in the article. We excluded papers regarding UR during first trimester abortion induction of labor or pregnancy or unrelated to PGs use for STMA. Risk of bias was assessed employing a modified version of the "Newcastle-Ottawa Scale" (NOS).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

A total of 178 studies were initially identified as potentially meeting the criteria for inclusion in the review. After full text evaluation, 110 other articles were excluded and 67 studies that suited the inclusion criteria were included. A total of 19 of the included studies were judged to have a high risk of bias. Given the heterogeneous nature of the findings, we opted for a narrative synthesis of the results.

MAIN RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

PGs appear to be an effective pharmacologic tool for STMA; however, their use is not entirely risk-free. STMA requires well-equipped obstetric centers with skilled clinicians and surgeons prepared for emergencies. Ultrasonographic scans should be routinely performed during STMA management, since a UR can also be silent during the induction of labor. Intrapartum transabdominal, transperineal, and transvaginal ultrasound may have the diagnostic potential to early recognize this obstetric emergency, to facilitate rapid medical and surgical treatment, improving the outcome.

Comparing the outcomes of termination of second trimester pregnancy with a live fetus using intravaginal misoprostol between women with and without previous cesarean section

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of termination of pregnancy with live fetuses in the second trimester (14-28 weeks), using misoprostol 400 mcg intravaginal every 6 h, between women with previous cesarean section (PCS) and no previous cesarean section (no PCS).

METHODS

A comparative study was conducted on a prospective database of pregnancy termination in the second trimester, Chiang Mai university hospital. Inclusion criteria included: (1) singleton pregnancy; (2) gestational age between 14 and 28 weeks; and (3) pregnancy with a live fetus and medically indicated for termination. The participants were categorized into two groups; PCS and no PCS group. All were terminated using misoprostol 400 mcg intravaginal every 6 h. The main outcomes were induction to fetal delivery interval and success rate, defined as fetal delivery within 48 h.

RESULTS

A total of 238 women, including 80 PCS and 158 no PCS, were recruited. The success rate of fetal delivery within 48 h between both groups was not significantly different (91.3% vs. 93.0%; p-value 0.622). The induction to fetal delivery interval were not significantly different (1531 vs. 1279 min; p-value > 0.05). Gestational age was an independent factor for the success rate and required dosage of misoprostol. The rates of most adverse effects of misoprostol were similar. One case (1.3%) in the PCS group developed uterine rupture during termination, ending up with safe and successful surgical removal and uterine repair.

CONCLUSION

Intravaginal misoprostol is highly effective for second trimester termination of pregnancy with PCS and those with no PCS, with similar success rate and induction to fetal delivery interval. Gestational age was an independent factor for the success rate and required dosage of misoprostol. Uterine rupture could occur in 1.3% of PCS, implying that high precaution must be taken for early detection and proper management.

SYNOPSIS

Intravaginal misoprostol is highly effective for termination of second trimester pregnancy with a live fetus, with a comparable success rate between women with and without previous cesarean section, with a 1.3% risk of uterine rupture among women with previous cesarean section.

Factors Influencing the Duration of Termination of Pregnancy for Fetal Anomaly with Mifepristone in Combination with Misoprostol

This study's aim was to determine relevant factors that influence the time interval between first induction and fetal expulsion in late termination of pregnancy (TOP) and TOP after previous feticide for severe fetal malformation with a mifepristone-misoprostol regime. This retrospective study included 913 TOPs from a single tertiary care referral center. In 197 out of 913 TOPs, a previous feticide had been performed due to advanced gestational age (after 22 + 0 weeks of gestation). Induction was accomplished using 600 mg mifepristone followed by 400 μg misoprostol. The interval between first induction with misoprostol and fetal expulsion was examined. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to predict an induction interval of 12 h or less. The median gestational age at induction of labor was 18.9 weeks of pregnancy. In 487 (53.3%) cases women delivered within 12 h; in 344 (37.7%) cases the induction interval was between 12 h and 36 h. In 82 (9%) cases induction took longer than 36 h. Factors that were significantly associated with a delivery duration of <12 h were a lower gestational age at induction (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.84-0.89; p < 0.001) and a history of at least one previous vaginal delivery (OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.20-2.05; p < 0.001). Factors that had no impact included previous cesarean section, performing feticide before induction and maternal age. Maternal BMI showed a non-significant trend.

Vaginal misoprostol versus combined intracervical foley's catheter and oxytocin infusion for second trimester pregnancy termination in women with previous caesarean sections: a randomised control trial

Second trimester pregnancy termination has been reported to be associated with 3-5 times higher maternal morbidity and mortality risks more than first trimester termination. Medical methods had been thoroughly assessed and it is considered the anchor of the safe abortion care. Howevere, there is no global agreement regarding the ideal method for induction of the second trimester abortion in a scarred uterus. The aim of this study was to achieve vaginal expulsion in an expeditious manner with less maternal complications. A total of 158 women having, a history of previous caesarean section undergoing second trimester pregnancy termination, were randomly allocated into group (1) vaginal misoprostol group (n = 79) or group (2) combined intracervical foley's catheter plus intravenous oxytocin infusion group (n = 79). The primary endpoint was complete fetal expulsion. Meanwhile, secondary outcomes were the rates of maternal complications, in terms of the need for surgical evacuation of retained product of conception (ERPOC), severe haemorrhage, uterine rupture, blood transfusion, cervical laceration, diarrhoea, vomiting and fever. The registration number of this trial https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04501809. This study showed that the combined use of intracervical foley's catheter and oxytocin is an effective, and safe alternative to vaginal misoprostol for termination of the second trimester pregnancy in women having a previous caesarean delivery.Impact statementWhy was this study conducted? The purpose of this study is to achieve an expeditious delivery for second trimester pregnancy termination in a scarred uterus by combined mechanical and pharmacological methods without significant morbidity. Physicians should balance the benefit of achieving vaginal exlpusion in an expeditious manner versus the risk of uterine rupture or any other maternal complications.What does this add to what is known? This study showed that a combined mechanical and pharmacolohical approach for second trimester termination of pregnancy has comparable efficacy and safety to vaginal misoprostol which is more affordable to the low resources countries where termination of pregnancy in a scarred uterus still has an increased maternal morbidity.What is the implication of this study on clinical practice? The combined use of intracervical foley's catheter with intravenous oxytocin infusion is a safer option than vaginal misoprostol with less serious maternal complications.

Medical termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly at or beyond 20 weeks' gestation-What are the maternal risks?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the common and severe maternal morbidities associated with medical termination of pregnancy (MTOP) for fetal anomaly ≥20 weeks' gestation.

METHODS

A 10-year retrospective cohort study (January 2010-December 2019) analyzing 407 consecutive singleton pregnancies MTOP for fetal anomaly ≥20 weeks' gestation, at a quaternary maternity centre in Australia (Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne).

RESULTS

The cohort comprised of 191 primiparous and 216 multiparous women, of whom 75 (34.7%) had at least one prior Cesarean; 13 women had a low-lying placenta or placenta praevia. The average gestation was 23 weeks (interquartile range 22-26 weeks). A spontaneous unassisted vaginal delivery was achieved by the majority (n = 403, 99.0%). The most common maternal morbidities were transferred to the theater for manual removal of retained placental tissue (n = 65, 16.0%) and postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) (n = 45, 11.1%). Severe maternal morbidity occurred in six cases (1.3%) and included amniotic fluid embolism, cardiac arrest, major obstetric haemorrhage, uterine rupture and intensive care unit admission. There were no maternal deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The most common complications of MTOP for fetal anomaly ≥20 weeks' gestation were manual removal of placenta and PPH. Severe maternal morbidity affected 1 in 81 women.

The safety of misoprostol alone use for second-trimester termination of pregnancy in women with previous caesarean deliveries

PURPOSE

To investigate the safety of misoprostol use in second-trimester pregnancy termination among women with previous caesarean sections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary centre, examining 359 patients whose pregnancy was terminated with misoprostol alone between 14 and 24 weeks with the indication of foetal anomalies. Two dose regimens were administered vaginally or sublingually: (1)400 mcg misoprostol every 3-6 h; (2) 200 mcg misoprostol every 3-6 h following a loading dose of 400 mcg. The patients were divided into three groups according to the number of previous caesarean sections (CSs) and compared in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics and complications. Termination-related complications were the primary outcomes considered.

RESULTS

Of the 217 patients, 80 (36.8%) had no previous uterine scar, 79 (36.4%) had one previous CS, and 58 (26.7%) had at least two prior CSs. The overall complication rate was 0.9%. There were no differences among groups in terms of complications (p > 0.05). There was no difference in complications in women with prior CS when they were compared according to the misoprostol regimens used (p > 0.05). The total dose of misoprostol used ranged from200 to 3,600 mcg. The treatment success of misoprostol during the second trimester was 92.1%. According to regression analysis, an increase in the week of gestation increased the failure rate of misoprostol for inducing second-trimester abortion by 2.7 times (95%CI (1.38-5.39)).

CONCLUSION

Misoprostol alone is a safe and effective option for terminating second-trimester pregnancies with one or more previous CSs in settings where mifepristone is unavailable.

Misoprostol complications in second-trimester termination of pregnancy among women with a history of more than one cesarean section

Objective

This study aims to investigate the complications due to misoprostol administration for second-trimester termination of pregnancy among women with history of 2 or more cesarean scarring.

Methods

The cohort of this retrospective study included 678 subjects who required second-trimester pregnancy termination, from 2013 to 2015 and treated with vaginal misoprostol of 100 to 400 µg. The subjects were divided into 3 groups based on their history of cesarean sections: without a history of cesarean section, with a history of one cesarean section, and with a history of more than one cesarean section and uterine scaring.

Results

The results showed that the success rate of misoprostol administration for pregnancy termination was 95.72%. The rate of bleeding as a complication was significantly higher in subjects with a history of more than one cesarean section than in other participants (risk ratio [RR], 2.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-4.0). The incidence of uterine rupture was higher in the group with a history of more than one cesarean section than in other groups. However, no significant difference was observed between the groups (RR, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.27-7.6). There was a significant relationship between the need for other auxiliary treatments in the pregnancy termination and the history of uterine scarring (RR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.23-9.1).

Conclusion

The present study showed that pregnancy termination using smaller divided dose of misoprostol in patients with previous history of cesarean scarring may be associated with lower incidence of uterine rupture.

Incidence of uterine rupture in second-trimester abortion with gemeprost alone compared to mifepristone and gemeprost

OBJECTIVES

To compare uterine rupture rates in women having a medical abortion receiving gemeprost alone to those receiving mifepristone plus gemeprost.

STUDY DESIGN

We reviewed the records of women undergoing medical abortion at 13 0/7-23 6/7 weeks from January 2007 to December 2014 at a single center in Italy. Prior to January 2011, we used gemeprost 1 mg vaginally every 3 h up to a maximum of five doses. After January 2011, we added mifepristone 200 mg orally 24 h prior to the same gemeprost protocol. The primary outcome of the study was the incidence of uterine rupture. We compared the outcome between women receiving gemeprost alone with the combination of gemeprost and mifepristone.

RESULTS

One thousand and sixty-one (58.5%) and 753 (41.5%) women underwent medical abortion in the gemeprost-alone and the gemeprost/mifepristone groups, respectively. Five (0.47%) uterine ruptures occurred in the gemeprost and four uterine ruptures occurred in the gemeprost/mifepristone groups, respectively (0.53%) (p=.89). All uterine ruptures occurred in women with prior cesarean delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

We rep orted no difference in the incidence of uterine rupture between the gemeprost-alone and gemeprost and mifepristone groups.

IMPLICATIONS

Uterine rupture is a rare complication of second-trimester medical abortion with gemeprost. Use of mifepristone prior to gemeprost does not affect this risk.

Incidence and contributing factors for uterine rupture in patients undergoing second trimester termination of pregnancy in a large tertiary hospital - a 10-year case series

INTRODUCTION

Uterine rupture is a rare complication in second trimester termination of pregnancy (TOP) with an overall incidence of up to 1.1%. There are concerns that patients with previous caesarean section(s) were at an increased risk of uterine rupture. However, there is no published data in our local population to date. This study aims to identify the incidence and contributing factors for uterine rupture in women undergoing TOP in Singapore.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective review of all women who had TOP between 14⁺⁰ weeks to 23⁺⁶ weeks gestation from January 2005 to December 2014 in a large tertiary hospital. Patients' characteristics and details of TOP were retrieved from pre-existing hospital databases. The gestation age and dose of gemeprost used were retrieved from an internal hospital audit conducted from December 2012 to July 2016.

RESULTS

A total of 3385 patients underwent TOP from 2005 to 2014. An estimated 339 patients had a scarred uterus. Seven cases of uterine rupture were identified, with an overall incidence of 0.21% (7/3385). The incidence of uterine rupture in patients with scarred uterus was 2.1% (7/339). Contributing factors identified included higher mean dose of abortifacient, usage of multiple abortifacients and methods, advanced gestation age and short interval between last caesarean section and current TOP.

CONCLUSION

Second trimester TOP on scarred uterus warrants careful usage of abortifacient with minimal cumulative dosage and should be carried out in early second trimester gestation whenever feasible. Prostaglandin analogues appeared to be safe for TOP in unscarred uteruses.