Renal effects of guanabenz: a new antihypertensive

Guanabenz-an old drug with a potential to decrease obesity

The aim of this study was to determine, in the diet-induced obesity model in rats, the potential of Guanabenz to reduce body weight and ameliorate some metabolic disturbances. Obesity was induced in rats by a high-fat diet. After 10 weeks, rats were treated intraperitoneally with Guanabenz at the two doses: 2 or 5 mg/kg b.w./day, once daily for 25 days. The spontaneous activity of rats was measured for 24 h on the 1st and 24th day of the Guanabenz treatment with a special radio-frequency identification system. Gastric emptying was measured in intragastric phenol red-treated mice by measuring the color of the stomach homogenate 30 min after phenol red administration. Intraperitoneal administration of Guanabenz for 25 days to obese rats resulted in a significant decrease in body weight compared to the baseline values (about 11% at a dose of 5 mg/kg). Both body weight and the amount of adipose tissue in the groups receiving Guanabenz decreased to the levels observed in the control rats fed only standard feed. The anorectic effect occurred in parallel with a reduction in plasma triglyceride levels. We also confirmed the beneficial effect of Guanabenz on plasma glucose level. The present study demonstrates that the administration of Guanabenz strongly inhibits gastric emptying (about 80% at a dose of 5 mg/kg). Guanabenz can successfully and simultaneously attenuate all the disorders and risk factors of metabolic syndrome: hypertension, hyperglycemia, obesity, and dyslipidemia. However, the exact cellular mechanisms of its action require further research.

Current status of putative imidazoline (I1) receptors and renal mechanisms in relation to their antihypertensive therapeutic potential

1. A 'second generation' of centrally acting antihypertensive agents has recently been developed. Unlike the 'first generation' of these agents (e.g. alpha-methyldopa, clonidine, guanabenz), which act predominantly by an agonist action at a alpha 2-adrenoceptors, these agents (e.g. rilmenidine, moxonidine) are believed to exert their antihypertensive effects chiefly by an interaction at putative imidazoline (I) receptors of the I1-type, and so have a reduced profile of alpha 2-adrenoceptor-mediated side effects. There is also evidence from studies in experimental animals that activation of I1-receptors mediates a natriuretic effect. This review evaluates the evidence that they mediate renal effects different from those of alpha 2-adrenoceptors that could contribute to their long-term efficacy. 2. Data from binding studies suggest that I1-binding sites are heterogeneous. There is conflicting evidence concerning whether any of these binding sites are truly receptors. Indeed, the best evidence for the existence of I1-receptors comes from in vivo experiments indicating that imidazoline compounds act at non-adrenoceptor receptive sites in the central nervous system to reduce sympathetic drive and blood pressure. 3. There are a wide range of potential sites and mechanisms through which centrally acting antihypertensive agents can affect renal function, including actions mediated within the central nervous system, heart, systemic circulation and within the kidneys themselves. 'First generation' centrally acting antihypertensive agents cause diuresis and natriuresis in rats, while in dogs and humans a diuresis is often seen with variable effects on sodium excretion. 4. Evidence from studies in anaesthetized rats indicates that rilmenidine and moxonidine can promote sodium excretion by interacting with both central nervous system and renal putative I1-receptors. This does not appear to necessarily be the case in other species. At this time there are few or no published data from clinical studies to suggest that 'second generation' centrally acting antihypertensive agents affect salt and water balance differently from 'first generation' agents.

Guanabenz: a centrally acting, natriuretic antihypertensive drug

Guanabenz is acutely natriuretic and diuretic in saline expanded animals. In man, guanabenz has not resulted in sodium retention as seen with other comparable antihypertensives. To directly define the action of guanabenz on sodium and water excretion in man, we performed clearance studies during water diuresis on eight hypertensive subjects under metabolic balance conditions. Each subject underwent three studies: 1) baseline study: no drug, a water diuresis study; this was followed by a saline load (= 2% BW); 2) acute study (24 hr after baseline): 16 mg guanabenz PO; and 3) chronic study: after one week of guanabenz 8 mg PO BID. In the acute guanabenz studies there were: 1) no changes in GFR or ERPF; 2) an increase in both sodium excretion and fractional sodium excretion; 3) a rise in free H2O clearance (CH2O) and (CH2O/GFR) X 100%. These findings were not sustained in the chronic guanabenz studies. We conclude that in man (preconditioned with prior saline loading) guanabenz is acutely natriuretic and water diuretic. These effects are due to decreased tubular sodium and water reabsorption, probably related to inhibition of alpha adrenergic activity. The data are consistent with selectively reduced renal sympathetic activity affecting sodium transport and provide a basis for the absence of edema and sodium retention associated with guanabenz therapy.

Guanabenz. A review of its pharmacodynamic properties and therapeutic efficacy in hypertension

Guanabenz is an orally active central alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist. Its antihypertensive action is thought to result from a decrease in sympathetic outflow from the brain to the peripheral circulatory system as a result of stimulation of central alpha 2-adrenoceptors. In mild to moderate hypertension it is as effective as methyldopa and clonidine in lowering blood pressure when used as the sole treatment. As with these drugs, guanabenz may be combined with a diuretic to increase its blood pressure-lowering effect. The overall incidence of side effects seen with guanabenz was at least as high as with methyldopa or clonidine, and side effects such as drowsiness or dry mouth have been bothersome enough to lead to discontinuation of guanabenz therapy in some patients. However, particularly troublesome effects such as sodium retention, depression or sexual dysfunction which may occur with methyldopa or clonidine have not been reported with guanabenz.

Causes of inadequate response to antihypertensive drugs. Volume factors

Diuretic therapy, by producing a negative salt and water balance, eliminates the false tolerance to sympatholytic drugs that often occurs during long-term monotherapy. This tolerance results from salt and water retention produced by the drugs. Review of published results suggests a primacy for arterial pressure reduction in this fluid because suppressed renal sympathetic activity should facilitate salt and water excretion through lessened alpha-adrenergic influence on tubular reabsorption, and beta-adrenergic inhibition would diminish renin release thus promoting natriuresis. The return of hypertension that characterizes the false tolerances seems paradoxical because these drugs cause venodilation, which should provide ample storage of expanded blood volume without affecting cardiac output. However, animal studies have suggested that dilated veins have decreased compliance; if that is so, in humans it would mean that fluid retention would be accompanied by a redistribution of blood into the central circulation, with a rise in cardiac output.

Evaluation of guanabenz added to hydrochlorothiazide therapy in hypertension

Guanabenz, a centrally acting alpha-adrenergic antihypertensive agent, produces neither the sodium retention seen with other centrally acting agents nor the metabolic abnormalities characteristic of diuretics. In this study, which involved 204 hypertensive out-patients, the additive effects of guanabenz and hydrochlorothiazide were compared with the effects of hydrochlorothiazide therapy alone. Before randomization to the 6-month blinded addition of either guanabenz or placebo, hydrochlorothiazide (50 or 100 mg/day; mean, 70 mg/day) was administered as sole therapy for 6 weeks. During this time, mean supine diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) decreased from 102 to 94 mm Hg (p less than 0.01), with a satisfactory clinical response rate of 62% and a mean weight loss of 2 lbs (p less than 0.01). No further change in mean SDBP occurred during the next 6 months of diuretic therapy, whereas the addition of guanabenz (mean dose, 24 mg/day) caused a further decrease in mean SDBP to 88 mm Hg (p less than 0.01), an increase in the response rate to 86%, and no weight change. Pulse rates in both groups were unchanged. The principal side-effects in both groups were dry mouth, drowsiness, weakness, and dizziness, with a greater incidence of each during the combination therapy. The usual laboratory abnormalities were associated with hydrochlorothiazide. Guanabenz was found to enhance the antihypertensive efficacy of hydrochlorothiazide without compromising its natriuretic properties or producing additional metabolic abnormalities.

Clonidine, a centrally acting sympathetic inhibitor, as monotherapy for mild to moderate hypertension

Sixteen patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension were treated with 0.2 mg of clonidine three times daily as the sole antihypertensive drug. Blood pressure decreased from 167 +/- 4/105 +/- 2 to 139 +/- 3/89 +/- 2 mm Hg (mean +/- standard error of the mean) after 1 week (p less than 0.001) and remained at 140 +/- 3/90 +/- 2 mm Hg after 3 months of therapy. There were no significant changes in cardiac output, blood volume, renal blood flow or glomerular filtration rate during clonidine therapy. Clonidine significantly decreased plasma catecholamines and there was a linear correlation between the change in blood pressure and decreases in plasma catecholamine concentration (r = 0.61, p less than 0.001). There was also a significant correlation between the decreases in heart rate and blood pressure (r = 0.78, p less than 0.001). It is concluded that clonidine can be used effectively and safely as the sole agent in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.

Comparative antihypertensive effects of guanabenz and clonidine

The safety and efficacy of guanabenz and clonidine were compared in 188 hypertensive patients during a 6-month double-blind trial. Mean supine diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) decreased from 103 to 88 mm Hg (p less than 0.01) among guanabenz patients and from 101 to 88 mm Hg (p less than 0.01) among clonidine patients who completed 6 months of b.i.d. therapy. Clinically significant individual SDBP decreases occurred in 85% of the guanabenz patients and 83% of the clonidine patients after 6 months. Adverse effects, consisting primarily of drowsiness, dry mouth, dizziness, and weakness, were similar in the two therapy groups. The responses obtained with guanabenz (b.i.d.) were maintained, along with a decrease in adverse effects, by an equivalent single daily dose of guanabenz during a second 6 months of therapy. Seventy-six per cent (13/17) of the patients whose blood pressure was not adequately controlled by guanabenz alone after 8 weeks of therapy subsequently responded to a combination of guanabenz and hydrochlorothiazide. Similarly, 85% (17/20) of the patients who failed to respond to clonidine alone subsequently responded to guanabenz either alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide. These results suggest that guanabenz or the combination of guanabenz and hydrochlorothiazide is effective therapy for the majority of hypertensive patients.

Centrally acting antihypertensive agents: a comparison of lofexidine with clonidine

Lofexidine, a new centrally acting antihypertensive agent, was compared in a double-blind study with clonidine in the treatment of mild (standing diastolic blood pressure 95-104 mm Hg) or moderate (105-129 mm Hg) essential hypertension. In dialy dosages of 0.2 or 0.4 mg, monotherapy with lofexidine produced significant decreases in blood pressure and heart rate that were not different from those with clonidine. Blood pressure and heart rate were not different from those with clonidine. Blood pressure control (supine and standing diastolic pressure less than 90 mm Hg) occurred in seven of eight mild hypertensives treated with lofexidine and in seven of ten treated with clonidine. In moderate hypertension, three of 11 and seven of ten, ten of the 14 responders to clonidine required dosages of 0.4 mg daily or less. The maximum dosage tested was 1.6 mg daily. Concomitant hydrochlorothiazide therapy was given to eight of the lofexidine responders and 12 of the clonidine responders. For both drugs, drowsiness and dry mouth were the chief complaints. Neither agent changed standard clinical biochemistries except for decreased potassium and increased bicarbonate concentrations due to concurrent diuretic therapy. Lofexidine to have clinical characteristics similar to those of clonidine. Each of these agents is best used in lower doses, which are frequently effective and less likely to produce symptomatic complaints.

Effects of placebo versus guanabenz on hypertensive out-patients

The objectives of this study were two-fold: (1) 1 4-week multicentre, randomized, double-blind efficacy comparison of placebo and guanabenz acetate, a new centrally acting antihypertensive drug, in 168 hypertensive out-patients and (2) a more accurate determination of the incidence of drug-related, non-specific side-effects. Both treatment groups were comparable: 68% female, 63% black, mean age 53 years; 57% mild, 32% moderate, 11% moderately severe hypertensives. Seventy-six placebo patients completed 4 weeks and had a mean supine diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) decrease from 105 to 101 mm Hg (p < 0.01). Seventy-nine guanabenz patients completing 4 weeks had a mean SDBP decrease from 104 to 92 mm Hg (p < 0.01). All of the placebo responses and 10/12 mm Hg of the guanabenz response occurred during Week 1. Clinically significant individual SDBP decreases occurred in thirty-one (41%) placebo and fifty-five (70%) guanabenz-treated patients (p < 0.01). Mean daily guanabenz dose was 24 mg. Drug-related biochemical or electrocardiographic abnormalities were absent. Side-effects of sedation and dry mouth were recorded two and three times more frequently, respectively, in guanabenz as compared to placebo patients. Side-effects usually occurred within Week 1 and diminished in incidence thereafter. Consequently, in these patients it appeared that: (1) guanabenz was an effective, well-tolerated drug, (2) placebo effects on efficacy were significant, occurred early and remained stable, and (3) placebo and guanabenz side-effects were mainly sedation and dry mouth.