Fluoride pharmacokinetics: its implications in the fluoride treatment of osteoporosis

Drugs used in the treatment of metabolic bone disease. Clinical pharmacology and therapeutic use

Osteoporosis is the most important metabolic bone disease and places an increasing burden on the healthcare system. The condition can be prevented by the early introduction of hormone replacement therapy. The role of bisphosphonates in achieving the same result is being actively explored. The attraction of preventing bone loss is that it preserves the micro-architecture of bone, and therefore its mechanical integrity. The great problem of treating the established condition is that substantial bone loss is accompanied by architectural disintegration. Replacing lost bone may not necessarily restore mechanical integrity and protect against fractures. The management of Paget's disease has been quite revolutionised by the introduction of the bisphosphonates. The condition is a result of a primary increase in osteoclastic bone resorption which can be corrected by bisphosphonates, with considerable symptomatic improvement. The increasing potency and safety margin of the newer agents has meant that the threshold for treatment has fallen. There is now potential for long term control of bone turnover with the hope of preventing late complications. Hypercalcaemia of malignancy is usually the result of both increased bone destruction and decreased urinary calcium excretion. These two components of hypercalcaemia demand different approaches to management. The general availability of an ever-expanding range of increasingly potent bisphosphonates has resulted in a dramatic improvement in the treatment of increased bone resorption associated with malignancy. Many types of tumour, either directly or indirectly, compromise the ability of the kidney to eliminate a calcium load derived from increased bone destruction. Calcitonin is the only agent which is currently available to counter this process.

A mathematical model for fluoride uptake by the skeleton

A mathematical model was developed that predicts fluoride accumulation and clearance from the skeleton based upon fluoride bioavailability, bone remodeling rate, and the fluoride binding characteristics of bone. It was assumed that fluoride binds to bone in a nonlinear fashion such that a smaller percentage of fluoride is bound to bone if fluoride intake is increased to high levels. Bone resorption rate was assumed to be proportional to the solubility of hydroxyfluoroapatite which is inversely related to bone fluoride content. The predictions made by the model compared favorably with experimental results from fluoride uptake and clearance studies. Parametric studies done using the model showed the following: (1) fluoride can be cleared from the skeleton by bone remodeling, but fluoride clearance takes over four times longer than does fluoride uptake; and (2) fluoride uptake by the skeleton was positively associated with bone remodeling rate. However, the concentration of fluoride in newly formed bone does not decrease with reduced remodeling rates and surpasses 10,000 ppm for intakes of fluoride greater than 9 mg/day. For osteoporosis, daily dose and duration of fluoride treatment should be selected to avoid reaching a toxic cumulative bone fluoride content.

The effects of fluoridated water on bone strength

Fluoride from fluoridated water accumulates not only in the enamel of teeth but also in the skeleton. The effects of fluoridated water on the skeleton are not well understood, yet there is some evidence that fluoridated water consumption increases the incidence of fractures. In the present study, femoral bending strength was measured in rats on fluoride intakes that ranged from low levels to levels well above natural high fluoride drinking water. Bone strength followed a biphasic relationship with bone fluoride content. Fluoride had a positive effect on bone strength for lower fluoride intakes and a negative influence on bone strength for higher fluoride intakes. The vertebral fluoride content at which femoral strength was maximum was between 1,100 and 1,500 ppm. The increase in femoral strength at this fluoride level was not accompanied by an increase in femoral bone density. The optimal fluoride content is within the range of bone fluoride contents found in persons living in regions with fluoridated water (1 ppm) for greater than 10 years.

Toward a cure for osteoporosis: reversal of excessive bone fragility

While estrogen replacement therapy and calcium supplementation appear to be effective at preventing postmenopausal osteoporosis, therapy for established osteoporosis is far less effective. The reduction of bone fragility should be a goal of a treatment for established osteoporosis. To this end, increases in cortical bone mass by subperiosteal new bone formation may produce the greatest mechanical advantage. Anti-resorptive drugs, such as etidronate, have shown potential for reducing the incidence of osteoporotic fracture in the short term, but their ability to produce a long-term benefit may be limited. An alternative approach might be to develop drug therapies that substantially increase cortical bone strength, namely by stimulating periosteal bone formation. Although sodium fluoride has proved to be problematic, there are several other potential osteoporosis therapies. They include treatment with anabolic hormones (e.g. growth hormone and anabolic steroids) and targeted delivery of growth factors. Also, anti-resorptive and formation-stimulating drugs might be combined in a new form of ADFR (coherence) therapy where the new acronym means: Activate-Depress-Formation stimulation-Repeat.

Fluoride bioavailability from immediate-release sodium fluoride with calcium carbonate compared with slow-release sodium fluoride with calcium citrate

The circadian variation in serum fluoride was compared between treatment with immediate-release sodium fluoride (IR-NaF) (30 mg) and calcium carbonate (500 mg calcium) and slow-release sodium fluoride (SR-NaF) (25 mg) and calcium citrate (400 mg calcium) in seven patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis maintained on long-term fluoride treatment. During 12 h following a dose of SR-NaF, serum fluoride levels could be largely kept within the therapeutic window (believed to be 95-190 ng/ml or 5-10 mumol/l). In contrast, IR-NaF produced a wide circadian fluctuation with peak-to-trough change of about 200 ng/ml. Compared to SR-NaF, IR-NaF caused a significantly higher peak fluoride concentration in serum (322 vs. 158 ng/ml), and greater area under the curve (2269 vs. 1321 ng.h/ml) and urinary fluoride (6.72 vs. 3.80 mg/12 h). Thus, fluoride absorption from IR-NaF was twice as high as that from SR-NaF.