Severe renal impairment as an adverse prognostic factor for survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients

Low non-relapse mortality and good haematological and renal responses after autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma patients with renal insufficiency at transplant: A prospective Société Francophone de Greffe de Moelle-Thérapie Cellulaire observational study

High-dose melphalan followed by autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation is widely used in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients as upfront therapy. However, the safety and efficacy of transplantation in patients with renal insufficiency (RI) are controversial. We followed a multicentre (16 SFGM-TC centres) prospective cohort of 50 newly diagnosed MM patients with a serum creatinine clearance of <40 mL/min at transplantation. Patients received a recommended dose of melphalan of 140 mg/m2. The primary end-point was the non-relapse mortality at Day 100. One death occurred during the first 100 days post-transplant. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 12 days and to platelet engraftment was 13 days. The haematological response improved in 69% of patients, with best responses from partial response (PR) to very good partial response (VGPR) (10%), from PR to complete response (CR)/stringent complete response (sCR) (16%), from VGPR to CR/sCR (39%) and from CR to sCR (2%). At 2 years, the overall survival was 84%, the progression-free survival was 70% and the cumulative incidence of relapse was 20%. The renal response improved in 59% of patients, with the best renal responses post-transplant being minimal (9%), partial (2%) and complete (48%). Autologous transplantation was safe and effective in myeloma patients with RI at transplant.

Difficult-to-treat patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: A review of clinical trial results

Overall outcomes for multiple myeloma have improved due to the availability of new therapies, but patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma harbouring certain factors continue to pose a therapeutic challenge. These challenging features include high-risk cytogenetics, renal impairment, patient characteristics such as age and frailty, and extramedullary disease. Prior refractory status and number of prior lines add further complexity to the treatment of these patients. While newer regimens are available and have suggested efficacy in these patient populations through subgroup analyses, differences in trial definitions and cut-offs make meaningful comparisons difficult. This review aims to examine the available clinical trial data for patients with high-risk cytogenetics, renal impairment, age and frailty and extramedullary disease.

Multiple Myeloma and Kidney Impairment at Diagnosis: A Nephrological Perspective from an Eastern European Country

Background and Objectives: The clinical presentation and survival factors in patients with myeloma-related kidney impairment (MRKI) at diagnosis remain a topic of ongoing research, given the complex interplay between nephrology and hematology. To date, no studies have specifically reported outcomes for these patients in Eastern Europe. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective, unicentric study of consecutive newly diagnosed patients with MRKI in our tertiary nephrology service in Romania between 2015 and 2020; follow-up extended until 1 September 2022, covering a study period of 90 months. Results: We identified 89 consecutive patients with MRKI (median age 66 years, 38% male, median eGFR 5 mL/min). The majority of patients had arterial hypertension (71%) and systemic atherosclerosis (58%), and the most frequent clinical features at presentation were asthenia (75%) and bone pain (51%). Light-chain-restricted myeloma was the most common type (55%), with kappa free light chain being more frequent (53%). Among the patients, 81% presented with acute kidney injury (AKI), and 38% required hemodialysis at diagnosis. During the study period, 65% of the patients died, and hypoalbuminemia and the need for hemodialysis at diagnosis were significantly associated with mortality in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Patients with MRKI who present to the nephrologist more frequently exhibit light chain restriction and most often present with AKI, with one-third requiring hemodialysis at diagnosis. Moreover, hypoalbuminemia and the initiation of hemodialysis at diagnosis were significantly associated with increased mortality.

Management of multiple myeloma-related renal impairment: recommendations from the International Myeloma Working Group

Here, the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) updates its clinical practice recommendations for the management of multiple myeloma-related renal impairment on the basis of data published until Dec 31, 2022. All patients with multiple myeloma and renal impairment should have serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and free light chains (FLCs) measurements together with 24-h urine total protein, electrophoresis, and immunofixation. If non-selective proteinuria (mainly albuminuria) or involved serum FLCs value less than 500 mg/L is detected, then a renal biopsy is needed. The IMWG criteria for the definition of renal response should be used. Supportive care and high-dose dexamethasone are required for all patients with myeloma-induced renal impairment. Mechanical approaches do not increase overall survival. Bortezomib-based regimens are the cornerstone of the management of patients with multiple myeloma and renal impairment at diagnosis. New quadruplet and triplet combinations, including proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, improve renal and survival outcomes in both newly diagnosed patients and those with relapsed or refractory disease. Conjugated antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor T-cells, and T-cell engagers are well tolerated and effective in patients with moderate renal impairment.

Lack of Renal Recovery Predicts Poor Survival in Patients of Multiple Myeloma With Renal Impairment

BACKGROUND

Renal impairment (RI) confers a poor prognosis in multiple myeloma. Reversibility of renal function is associated with improved survival in such patients. Patients in developing countries often present at an advanced stage and renal impairment is present in up to 40% of patients at diagnosis. We studied the renal outcome and survival of these patients with bortezomib-based induction therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

It was a single-center prospective study in a tertiary care multi-specialty institute in patients of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who presented with RI from July 2018 to December 2019. The diagnosis of multiple myeloma was made based on IMWG14 criteria. All patients received bortezomib and or immunomodulatory drug-based triplet or quadruplet induction therapy. Hematological and renal outcomes were assessed as per IMWG 2016 criteria.

RESULTS

Among 216 consecutive patients of NDMM, RI was seen in 91 (42.2%) patients. The median age of 91 patients was 60 years. (range- 32-80 years). Light chain myeloma was seen in 26% (n = 24) of patients. The median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 15.36 mL/min (3.1-38 mL/min) and a majority of patients were in the advanced ISS stage. (ISS III = 85.7%). Thirty-six (39.5%) patients received hemodialysis at presentation. Renal response was seen in 67 (73%) patients and 20 (out of 36; 55%) became dialysis independent over a median time of 38 days (Range 15-160 days). At a median follow-up of 14.7 months, 30 (33%) patients had died, of which, 14 (15.4%) patients had early mortality (within 2 months of diagnosis). Presence of light chain myeloma and cast nephropathy (definite or probable) were identified as independent predictors of poor renal recovery on multivariate analysis. (HR = 2.841; 95% CI [1.471-5.486], P = .002 for light chain myeloma; HR = 1.859; 95% CI (1.087-3.180); P = .024 for cast nephropathy) Patients with low eGFR at presentation (<12.5 mL/min) were more likely to have persistent renal insufficiency. (HR-3.521; 95% CI (1.856-6.679), P = .000). Patients who attained sustained renal recovery had improved survival as compared to patients in whom renal function failed to improve. (median OS- not reached vs. 8.3 months, P = .000) Achievement of hematological response and independence from hemodialysis was associated with improved survival on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Renal impairment was reversible in almost three-fourths of NDMM patients. achievement of hematological response and hemodialysis independence were independent predictors of improved overall survival in NDMM patients with RI.

An overview of treatment options for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and renal impairment

Renal impairment (RI) is a relatively common complication of multiple myeloma, which increases in frequency as disease becomes more advanced and recovery of renal function becomes less likely as patients progress through lines of therapy. Clinical trials in the relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) setting have not uniformly included patients with RI or robustly reported their outcomes. Here, we review existing data among patients with RI and RRMM across drug classes (including immunomodulatory agents, proteasome inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies, and exportin-1 inhibitor) to provide an improved understanding of available treatment options for this important population. We highlight data from pivotal clinical trials, including data relating to renal response (as defined by the International Myeloma Working Group) and discuss real-world experiences in patients with RI, where applicable. Despite substantial advances in RRMM treatment, the presence of RI remains associated with reduced overall survival. Consistent inclusion of patients with RI, and uniform reporting of their outcomes, should be encouraged in future prospective trials of treatments for RRMM.

Stratification for RRMM and Risk-Adapted Therapy: Sequencing of Therapies in RRMM

The treatment landscape for relapsed multiple myeloma (RRMM) has experienced an unprecedented wave of innovation. Implementation of numerous new substances and drug classes with different modes of action is made possible in routine clinical practice. Next generation proteasome inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, as well as first in class agents such as selinexor and venetoclax have widened the therapeutic spectrum. This has led to an increase in progression-free and overall survival. Consequently, new challenges for treating physicians in choosing the right treatment at the right stage of the disease have been generated. Several trials support the use of novel agents in the frontline treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. The use of lenalidomide or bortezomib as a backbone in the first-line setting, requires strategies for treatment once these patients relapse and are refractory to these drugs. Despite the variety of options, selecting the optimal treatment strategy is difficult, since multiple factors have to be considered: patient-specific factors such as age and co-morbidities, as well as myeloma/tumor specific factors such as cytogenetics and relapse kinetics. This review intends to summarize the existing data and guidelines regarding the optimal sequencing of treatments of RRMM using already approved agents as well as agents under investigation.

Severe renal impairment as an adverse prognostic factor for survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients

Background

Renal impairment (RI) is associated with poor survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Renal function recovery has been one of the main therapeutic goals in those patients.

Methods

The records from 393 newly diagnosed MM patients in our hospital between January 2012 and December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. RI was defined as an eGFR < 40 mL/min according to the novel IMWG criteria. RI patients were categorized based on their renal function at diagnosis: severe RI: eGFR < 30 mL/min, and mild RI: 30 mL/min ≤ eGFR <40 mL/min. We explored whether RI, and particularly severe RI, was an adverse prognostic factor for survival, and investigated the impact of renal function recovery on survival.

Results

Severe RI, hemoglobin <100 g/L, LDH ≥ 245 U/L, hyperuricemia, 1q21 amplification, and lack of novel agent treatment were associated with decreased overall survival (OS). Severe RI patients with renal response had a median OS of 27 months compared with 18 months for those patients without renal response (P = .030), but their median OS was still significantly lower than that for patients without severe RI, which was 51 months. In severe RI patients, the overall renal response rate in bortezomib‐based regimens was significantly higher than that in nonbortezomib‐based regimens.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that severe RI is an adverse prognostic factor for survival in newly diagnosed MM patients, restoration of renal function may improve survival, and bortezomib‐based regimens may be the preferred treatment in patients with severe RI.