Stratification for RRMM and Risk-Adapted Therapy: Sequencing of Therapies in RRMM

Characterization and Outcomes of Spanish Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Included in the LocoMMotion Study

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in treatments for multiple myeloma (MM), most patients relapse and become refractory to standard drug classes including immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors (PIs), and anti-CD38 antibodies. The LocoMMotion study showed poor clinical outcomes in triple-class exposed patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) treated with real-world clinical practice (RWCP) therapy. Here, we report efficacy outcomes for Spanish patients receiving RWCP treatments in the LocoMMotion study compared with the full cohort.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The prospective, noninterventional, multinational LocoMMotion study (NCT04035226) enrolled 248 patients who had received ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy (LOT), including a PI, an IMiD, and an anti-CD38 antibody, with disease progression during or after their last LOT. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Spanish patients (n = 24) had received a median of 4 prior LOT (range, 2-7). At 29.2 months median follow-up, patients had received 14 different treatment regimens used in RWCP during the study. Efficacy outcomes were consistent between the Spanish cohort and overall study population. The ORR was 29.2% (95% CI, 12.6%-51.1%). Median PFS and OS were 4.6 months (95% CI, 1.2-6.3) and 11.6 months (95% CI, 6.4-24.5), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Spanish patients from the LocoMMotion study demonstrated poor outcomes in response to RWCP treatments consistent with those of the overall study population, highlighting the need for access to new and effective therapies for patients with RRMM in Spain and globally.

Efficacy of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Myeloma Patients with Suboptimal Response: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard of care for myeloma patients who achieve partial response (PR) or better after induction therapy. However, its clinical significance in patients with suboptimal response (SR) before ASCT, including stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD), has not been established. Additionally, functional high-risk, including SR and early PD within 12 months, was a poor prognostic factor up to now. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ASCT in myeloma patients with SR in the novel agent era. This multicenter retrospective study was conducted using the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program database of the Japanese Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy and included 3898 transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who underwent ASCT between 2007 and 2020 and were followed up until 2021. The SR rate was 4.7%, including 1.7% with PD. In survival time analysis for overall cases, a significant difference in PFS between the very good partial response (VGPR) and PR groups was observed, whereas there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the VGPR and PR groups. Additionally, there was no significant difference in OS or PFS between the PR and SD groups. Therefore, we focused on the PR, SD, and PD groups, as the purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the clinical significance of ASCT in patients with SR compared with those with PR. The median patient age was 60 years (range, 30 to 77 years). In total, 1605 (97.4%) patients received bortezomib, 561 (38.2%) received an immunomodulatory drug (ImiD), and 512 (34.9%) received both bortezomib and an ImiD. A total of 558 patients (38.0%) received reinduction therapy. There were 229 patients (37.7%) with high-risk cytogenetics (HRCA). With a median follow-up of 31.7 months, there was a significant difference in 30-month OS rates among the PR, SD, and PD groups (86.3%, 78.5%, and 39.4%, respectively; P <.001). OS was significantly shorter in the SD group compared to the PR group among the patients with HRCA (P < .001) and patients treated with reinduction therapy (P = .013). In the PD group, the 30-month OS and PFS rates were 39.4% and 17.9%, respectively. Finally, early PD within 12 months after ASCT was predictive of short OS, whereas OS without early PD even in the PD group was similar to that in the SD and PR groups. In conclusion, OS in the SR group was not always short, but SR in the HRCA and the reinduction therapy groups was predictive of short OS, so that therapeutic alternatives to ASCT are needed. OS in the PD group was significantly short, but ASCT improved clinical outcomes when early PD did not occur even in the PD group.

Assessing Pretransplant and Posttransplant Therapy Response in Multiple Myeloma Patients

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematologic cancer defined by an abnormal development of clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow, releasing vast quantities of immunoglobulins and different proteins. In the majority of patients, MM remains incurable despite decades of medical improvement and a number of treatment breakthroughs. Frontline standard-of-care has little long-term success, with the majority of patients eventually relapsing, although the overall progression-free survival (PFS) has improved significantly in the last ten years. Patients who are eligible for a transplant have the highest PFS rate at 5 years, depending on medication response and other various factors that are yet to be discovered. Therefore, the current study aimed to evaluate the response to VCD (bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone) and VTD (bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone) used as pretransplant regimens, as well as to compare responses between thalidomide and lenalidomide used as maintenance therapy posttransplant. This retrospective study was performed on a group of 105 hospitalized patients in the Hematology Department of the Timisoara Municipal Emergency Clinical Hospital between January 2016 and December 2021. Data was collected from the paper records of patients with MM who were under-followed. The treatment regimens used as induction therapy were either VCD or VTD if cyclophosphamide was contraindicated. Of the 105 patients, 27 became eligible for bone marrow transplantation. Furthermore, they received maintenance therapy which was based on either lenalidomide with dexamethasone or thalidomide with dexamethasone. Of the 62 patients treated with VTD, 17.7% were in complete remission before stem cell transplantation. Of the 43 patients treated with VCD, 37.2% were in complete remission. The 5-year mean progression-free survival (PFS) in the entire cohort was better in the group treated with the VTD regimen (31.6 vs. 27.2 months). However, in the 27 patients undergoing maintenance after ASCT, the PFS with thalidomide was 35.5 months (95% CI = 27-42), while the PFS rate in those receiving maintenance treatment with lenalidomide was 46.1 months (95% CI = 20-73). VCD proved to be superior to VTD in inducing complete pretransplant responses. Regarding maintenance therapy, patients from the lenalidomide group had superior responses compared with those under thalidomide.