The Effect of Food or Omeprazole on the Pharmacokinetics of Osimertinib in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and in Healthy Volunteers

Drug repurposing for cancer therapy

Cancer, a complex and multifactorial disease, presents a significant challenge to global health. Despite significant advances in surgical, radiotherapeutic and immunological approaches, which have improved cancer treatment outcomes, drug therapy continues to serve as a key therapeutic strategy. However, the clinical efficacy of drug therapy is often constrained by drug resistance and severe toxic side effects, and thus there remains a critical need to develop novel cancer therapeutics. One promising strategy that has received widespread attention in recent years is drug repurposing: the identification of new applications for existing, clinically approved drugs. Drug repurposing possesses several inherent advantages in the context of cancer treatment since repurposed drugs are typically cost-effective, proven to be safe, and can significantly expedite the drug development process due to their already established safety profiles. In light of this, the present review offers a comprehensive overview of the various methods employed in drug repurposing, specifically focusing on the repurposing of drugs to treat cancer. We describe the antitumor properties of candidate drugs, and discuss in detail how they target both the hallmarks of cancer in tumor cells and the surrounding tumor microenvironment. In addition, we examine the innovative strategy of integrating drug repurposing with nanotechnology to enhance topical drug delivery. We also emphasize the critical role that repurposed drugs can play when used as part of a combination therapy regimen. To conclude, we outline the challenges associated with repurposing drugs and consider the future prospects of these repurposed drugs transitioning into clinical application.

The effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of Sutetinib maleate capsule, an irreversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in healthy Chinese subjects

Sutetinib is an irreversible inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and showed favorable efficacy and safety in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring nondrug-resistant rare EGFR mutations. To evaluate the potential food effect, eighteen healthy Chinese subjects were enrolled in a single-centre, randomized, open-label, two-sequence, two-period crossover study. Sutetinib was administered as a single oral 100 mg under fasting or fed conditions, and pharmacokinetic sampling was performed following each dose and analysed by a validated liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry method. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated. Food intake slightly decreased maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0 - inf) of sutetinib (geometric least-squares mean [GLSM] ratio, 80.94% and 86.11%; 90% confidence interval [CI], 68.43-95.72 and 75.88-97.73) and its active metabolite sutetinib N-Oxide (GLSM ratio, 75.58% and 84.00%; 90% CI, 65.69-86.95 and 75.42-93.56), respectively. In addition, the time to maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) of both sutetinib and its metabolite has been prolonged by 2 h under fed conditions. A total of 31 adverse events (AEs) occurred during the study, with no serious adverse events (SAE) reported, and no obvious difference was observed between the fasting and fed groups. Our results demonstrated that a high-fat and high-calorie diet caused a significant delay in drug absorption and a marginal reduction in drug exposure. Sutetinib was generally well tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects. (This trial was registered at http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn . The registration No. is CTR20201933, and the date of registration is 2020-10-16).

Prognostic impact of concomitant pH-regulating drugs in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: the Tokushukai REAl-world Data project 01-S1

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine the prognostic impact of concomitant pH-regulating drug use in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study and reviewed clinical data of consecutive patients with NSCLC treated with the first-line EGFR-TKIs in 46 hospitals between April 2010 and March 2020. Cox regression analyses were conducted to examine the differences in overall survival (OS) between patients treated with and without concomitant pH-regulating drugs, including potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs), proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), and H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs).

RESULTS

A total of 758 patients were included in the final dataset, of which 307 (40%) were administered concomitant pH-regulating drugs while receiving frontline EGFR-TKIs. After adjusting for basic patient characteristics, patients administered gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, and osimertinib with concomitant pH-regulating drugs had lower OS than those without concomitant pH-regulating drugs, with hazard ratios of 1.74 (with a 95% confidence interval of 1.34-2.27), 1.33 (0.80-2.22), 1.73 (0.89-3.36), and 5.04 (1.38-18.44), respectively. The 2-year OS rates of patients receiving gefitinib with or without concomitant pH-regulating drugs were 65.4 and 77.5%, those for erlotinib were 55.8 and 66.6%, and those for afatinib were 63.2 and 76.9%, respectively. The 1-year OS rates of patients receiving osimertinib with or without concomitant pH-regulating drugs were 88.1% and 96.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In addition to the first-generation EGFR-TKIs, the second- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs also resulted in OS deterioration in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC when used concurrently with pH-regulating drugs.

Exploring inter-ethnic and inter-patient variability and optimal dosing of osimertinib: a physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling approach

Purpose: This study aimed to develop and validate a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for osimertinib (OSI) to predict plasma trough concentration (Ctrough) and pulmonary EGFRm+ (T790M and L858R mutants) inhibition in Caucasian, Japanese, and Chinese populations. The PBPK model was also utilized to investigate inter-ethnic and inter-patient differences in OSI pharmacokinetics (PK) and determine optimal dosing regimens. Methods: Population PBPK models of OSI for healthy and disease populations were developed using physicochemical and biochemical properties of OSI and physiological parameters of different groups. And then the PBPK models were validated using the multiple clinical PK and drug-drug interaction (DDI) study data. Results: The model demonstrated good consistency with the observed data, with most of prediction-to-observation ratios of 0.8-1.25 for AUC, Cmax, and Ctrough. The PBPK model revealed that plasma exposure of OSI was approximately 2-fold higher in patients compared to healthy individuals, and higher exposure observed in Caucasians compared to other ethnic groups. This was primarily attributed to a lower CL/F of OSI in patients and Caucasian. The PBPK model displayed that key factors influencing PK and EGFRm+ inhibition differences included genetic polymorphism of CYP3A4, CYP1A2 expression, plasma free concentration (fup), albumin level, and auto-inhibition/induction on CYP3A4. Inter-patient PK variability was most influenced by CYP3A4 variants, fup, and albumin level. The PBPK simulations indicated that the optimal dosing regimen for patients across the three populations of European, Japanese, and Chinese ancestry was OSI 80 mg once daily (OD) to achieve the desired range of plasma Ctrough (328-677 nmol/L), as well as 80 mg and 160 mg OD for desirable pulmonary EGFRm+ inhibition (>80%). Conclusion: In conclusion, this study's PBPK simulations highlighted potential ethnic and inter-patient variability in OSI PK and EGFRm+ inhibition between Caucasian, Japanese, and Chinese populations, while also providing insights into optimal dosing regimens of OSI.

Pharmacology of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Implications for Patients with Kidney Diseases

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have introduced a significant advancement in cancer management. These compounds are administered orally, and their absorption holds a pivotal role in determining their variable efficacy. They exhibit extensive distribution within the body, binding strongly to both plasma and tissue proteins. Often reliant on efflux and influx transporters, TKI undergo primary metabolism by intestinal and hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes, with nonkidney clearance being predominant. Owing to their limited therapeutic window, many TKI display considerable intraindividual and interindividual variability. This review offers a comprehensive analysis of the clinical pharmacokinetics of TKI, detailing their interactions with drug transporters and metabolic enzymes, while discussing potential clinical implications. The prevalence of kidney conditions, such as AKI and CKD, among patients with cancer is explored in their effect on TKI pharmacokinetics. Finally, the potential nephrotoxicity associated with TKI is also examined.

The Association between Proton Pump Inhibitors and the Effectiveness of CDK Inhibitors in HR+/HER- Advanced Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

There have been many clinical questions regarding whether the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) could deteriorate the effects of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKIs) in HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of this clinical question, including studies enrolling HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients treated with CDKIs (Palbociclib or Ribociclib) and reporting at least one comparative survival outcome, either overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS), between concomitant PPI users and non-users. Eight studies met the eligibility criteria, with a total of 2584 patients included (PPI users: 830, PPI non-users: 1754), demonstrating that concomitant PPI use was associated with significantly higher risks of all-cause mortality (HR = 2.03; 95% CI, 1.49 to 2.77; I2 = 0%) and disease progression (HR = 1.75; 95% CI, 1.26 to 2.43; I2 = 59%) in breast cancer patients taking Palbociclib. In contrast, there were no significant survival impacts of PPIs on Ribociclib (HR = 1.46; 95% CI, 0.91 to 2.34; I2 = 36%). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the risk associated with CDKI dose reduction due to drug toxicity (RR = 1.12; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.29). Therefore, when HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients require the use of PPIs, it may be reasonable to consider using Ribociclib.

Effect of Food on the Pharmacokinetics of Limertinib (ASK120067) and its Main Metabolite in Healthy Chinese Volunteers

Limertinib (ASK120067) is a newly developed third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. This phase I, open-label, 2-period crossover study was conducted to evaluate the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of limertinib and its active metabolite CCB4580030 in Chinese healthy volunteers (HVs). HVs were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a single dose of limertinib (160 mg) under the fasted state in period 1 and fed condition in period 2, or vice versa. Twenty-four HVs were enrolled, and 20 HVs completed both study periods. PK were assessed before dosing and ≤72 hours after dosing. PK parameters were analyzed by a noncompartmental method. Limertinib was absorbed faster in the fasted state compared with the fed state. The geometric mean ratios (fed/fast) of maximum concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity for ASK120067 were 145.5%, 145.4%, and 141.9%, respectively. Geometric mean ratios of the PK parameters of CCB4580030 were >125.00% and 90% confidence intervals were outside the preset bioequivalent range. Safety profiles were similar in both prandial states, and limertinib was well tolerated. Food reduced the rate and increased the extent of limertinib absorption following oral administration. Whether limertinib can be administered regardless of prandial state in patients warrants further investigation of efficacy and safety.

Rapid extraction of osimertinib and its active metabolite in urine by miniaturized centrifugal spin-column extraction using ionic liquid hybrid hierarchical porous adsorbent

Osimertinib (OSIM) is widely used as a mainstream drug for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the lack of a rapid extraction and detection method for OSIM and its metabolite, AZ-5104, has limited clinical drug metabolism and drug resistance research because the drug is unstable. In this study, a new ionic liquid hybrid hierarchical porous material (IL-HHPM) was synthesized with hierarchical porous structures, including micropores (1.6-2.0 nm), mesopores (2.0-50.0 nm), macropores (50.0-148.7 nm), and multiple functional groups via a one-step hydrothermal method using silanized ionic liquids (IL) as functionalized hybrid monomer. The IL-HHPM has the advantages of a high specific surface area (437.4 ± 4.6 m2 g-1), sizable pore volume (0.74 cm3 g-1), and fast mass transfer, additionally, the IL-HHPM adsorbed OSIM and AZ-5104 via π-π interactions and hydrogen bonding. OSIM and AZ-5104 were rapidly extracted and measured in human urine using rapid and miniaturized centrifugal spin-column extraction (MCSCE), which was based on the IL-HHPM. The optimized factors for the extraction recoveries of OSIM and AZ-5104 were adsorbent dosage (8.0 mg), sample volume (0.5 mL), and operation time (9.0 min), and markedly reduced the adsorbent dosage and operation time. The IL-HHPM-MCSCE-HPLC method displayed good linearity (0.02-5.00 μg mL-1, r ≥ 0.9997), satisfying accuracy (spiked recoveries of 87.7%-100.0%), and good precision (RSDs ≤ 7.0%). The developed method is rapid, sensitive, and reproducible for the simultaneous determination of trace level of OSIM and AZ-5104 in human urine.

Does Proton Pump Inhibitors Decrease the Efficacy of Palbociclib and Ribociclib in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer?

Background and Objectives: This investigation aimed to determine the impacts of concurrent proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer managed with palbociclib or ribociclib as either the initial or subsequent line of therapy option. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, patients were classified as “concurrent PPIs” if PPIs were given for at least two-thirds of the palbociclib or ribociclib therapy period, and “no concurrent PPIs” if no PPIs were given during the period of palbociclib or ribociclib therapy. Each patient was also classified as endocrine-sensitive or endocrine-resistant according to the duration of previous endocrine responses. “Concurrent PPIs” and “no concurrent PPIs” groups were compared with each other in terms of PFS. This comparison was performed for both ribociclib and palbociclib groups. Results: The research included 220 patients in total. The PFS of 57 patients on palbociclib using concomitant PPIs was 14.4 months. Among 63 patients using palbociclib without concomitant PPIs, the PFS was 15.8 months. No statistically significant difference was found with PPI use (p = 0.82). Among 29 patients using ribociclib concurrently with PPIs, the PFS was 22.4 months. Among 71 patients using ribociclib without PPIs, the PFS was 20.2 months. No statistically significant difference was found with PPI use (p = 0.40). Conclusion: The results of our investigation showed that concomitant use of the most commonly used PPIs in the study (lansoprazole, pantoprazole, and esomeprazole) with palbociclib or ribociclib did not have any detrimental effects on PFS. Where appropriate, PPIs can be used concurrently with palbociclib and ribociclib. However, the effect of PPIs on cycling-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors deserves further investigation.

Drug-drug interactions with proton pump inhibitors in cancer patients: an underrecognized cause of treatment failure

New concepts and drugs have revolutionized medical treatment for cancers. These drugs, which are very expensive and usually well tolerated, have dramatically improved cancer prognosis. We must use them wisely for patients to fully benefit. Gastric acid antisecretory drugs and particularly proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) revolutionized the treatment of gastroduodenal ulcers and severe gastroesophageal reflux, but are frequently overused for symptomatic treatment of epigastric pain or heartburn. Long-term acid suppression may alter the efficacy of many anticancer drugs, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), by either decreasing gastric acid secretion and thus drug absorption, or by modifying the gut microbiome that modulates the response to ICIs. Oncologists thus need to pay particular attention to the concomitant use of PPIs and anticancer drugs. These interactions translate into major clinical impacts, with demonstrated loss of efficacy for some TKIs (erlotinib, gefitinib, pazopanib), and conflicting results with many other oral drugs, including capecitabine and CDK 4/6 inhibitors. Furthermore, the profound changes in the gut microbiome due to using PPIs have shown that the benefit of using ICIs may be suppressed in patients treated with PPIs. As the use of PPIs is not essential, we must apply the precautionary principle. The first sentence of a recent Comment in Nature was "Every day, millions of people are taking medications that will not help them". We fear that every day millions of cancer patients are taking medications that harm them. While this may well be only association and not causation, there is enough to make us pause until we reach a clear answer. All these data should encourage medical oncologists to refrain from prescribing PPIs, explaining to patients the risks of interaction in order to prevent inappropriate prescription by another physician.

The status of TKI/acid-suppressant concomitant use in 44 hospitals in China: A cross-sectional descriptive study

The irrational use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has attracted increasing attention, especially because of drug-drug interactions. The objective of this study was to analyze TKI prescriptions and evaluate the rationality of concomitant use of TKIs and acid-suppressants. TKI prescriptions from 2016 to 2018 were collected from hospitals in Beijing, Guangzhou, Hangzhou, and Zhengzhou for 40 d/yr. Focusing on the data in 2018, we analyzed the pharmacoeconomic indicators of TKIs and the number and proportion of different coprescriptions. The evaluation criteria for coprescriptions were based on clinical literature and package inserts. A total of 41,738 TKI prescriptions were assessed. The total dose and sales of imatinib were the highest, the medication days and defined daily doses of gefitinib were the highest, and the highest defined daily cost was sunitinib. Meanwhile, there were 17 TKIs with drug utilization indices of ≤ 1.0. The irrational combination rate of prescriptions of non-cancer-related departments was high in 3 cities, but not Hangzhou. The irrational combination rate of prescription of inpatient prescriptions was > 23% in the 4 cities. The combined use of TKIs and acid-suppressants is common in China and may have a clear or potential impact on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and adverse drug reactions of TKIs. Therefore, it is urgent to implement necessary interventions to stop such irrational use or if the combined use is necessary, to correct adverse consequences. The aims should be to achieve safe and effective use of TKIs and reduce unnecessary costs.

Effects of CYP3A4/5 and ABC transporter polymorphisms on osimertinib plasma concentrations in Japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer

The effects of polymorphisms in CYP3A4 (20230G > A), CYP3A5 (6986A > G), ABCB1 (1236C > T, 2677G > T/A, 3435C > T), ABCG2 (421C > A), and ABCC2 (-24C > T) on the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of osimertinib in 23 patients with non-small cell lung cancer were investigated. Blood sampling was performed just prior to and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h after osimertinib administration at the steady-state on day 15 after beginning therapy. The osimertinib AUC_0-24 was significantly correlated with age (P = 0.038), serum albumin (P = 0.002), and serum creatinine (P = 0.012). Additionally, there were significant differences in the AUC_0-24 of osimertinib among the groups administered vonoprazan, histamine 2-receptor antagonists or esomeprazole, and no acid suppressants (P = 0.021). By contrast, there were no significant differences in the AUC_0-24 of osimertinib between genotypes of CYP3A4/5 or ABC transporters. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the AUC_0-24 of osimertinib between patients with diarrhea, skin rash, or hepatotoxicity and those without these conditions. In multivariate analysis, only serum albumin value was an independent factor predicting the AUC_0-24 of osimertinib. Analysis of CYP3A4/5 and ABC transporter polymorphisms before osimertinib therapy may not predict the efficacy or side effects of osimertinib. The lower serum albumin values were associated with an increase in the AUC_0-24 of osimertinib; however, further studies are needed to assess the factors contributing to the interindividual variability of osimertinib pharmacokinetics.

Exposure-Response Analysis of Osimertinib in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

High interindividual variability (IIV) of the clinical response to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors such as osimertinib in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) might be related to the IIV in plasma exposure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the exposure−response relationship for toxicity and efficacy of osimertinib in unselected patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC. This retrospective analysis included 87 patients treated with osimertinib. Exposure−toxicity analysis was performed in the entire cohort and survival analysis only in second-line patients (n = 45). No significant relationship between occurrence of dose-limiting toxicity and plasma exposure was observed in the entire cohort (p = 0.23, n = 86). The median overall survival (OS) was approximately two-fold shorter in the 4th quartile (Q4) of osimertinib trough plasma concentration (>235 ng/mL) than in the Q1−Q3 group (12.2 months [CI95% = 8.0−not reached (NR)] vs. 22.7 months [CI95% = 17.1−34.1]), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.15). To refine this result, the exposure−survival relationship was explored in a cohort of 41 NSCLC patients treated with erlotinib. The Q4 erlotinib exposure group (>1728 ng/mL) exhibited a six-fold shorter median OS than the Q1−Q3 group (4.8 months [CI95% = 3.3-NR] vs. 22.8 months (CI95% = 10.6−37.4), p = 0.00011). These results suggest that high exposure to EGFR inhibitors might be related to worse survival in NSCLC patients.

Effect of Food Intake on Pharmacokinetics of Oral Almonertinib: A Randomized Crossover Trial in Healthy Chinese Participants

The third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) almonertinib (HS-10296) targets both EGFR-sensitizing and T790M resistance mutations. This randomized, open-label, two-period crossover trial investigated the effect of food intake on the single-dose pharmacokinetic properties of almonertinib and its metabolite HAS-719. Twenty healthy adults received a single dose of almonertinib tablets (110 mg) on days 1 and 22 under overnight fasting or fed conditions, respectively. Plasma samples were collected 216 hours post-dosing and almonertinib and HAS-719 concentrations were determined using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. For almonertinib, the geometric mean ratio (GMR, fed/fasting) and 90% confidence interval (CI) for the area under the curve (AUC) from time 0 to 216 hours and apparent oral clearance (CL_z /F) were 119.9 (110.0-130.7) and 83.5 (76.6-90.9), respectively. Fasting and fed groups showed significant differences in these parameters, but not for maximum concentration (C_max ) and time to C_max (T_max ). The C_max GMR of HAS-719 was 81.7 (75.8-88.0), which decreased significantly in the fed group. The drug-related adverse reaction (AR) incidence was similar in the two groups, 50% in the fasting group and 52.6% in the fed group. ARs were mainly gastrointestinal diseases and abnormal laboratory test results, and all participants fully recovered. In conclusion, a high-fat diet slightly affected the pharmacokinetic profile of almonertinib in healthy participants, but not the safety tolerance. Therefore, almonertinib is suitable for administration under fasting or fed conditions.

Proton pump inhibitors may reduce the efficacy of ribociclib and palbociclib in metastatic breast cancer patients based on an observational study

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 20-33% of all cancer patients are treated with acid-reducing agents (ARAs), most commonly proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), to reduce gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms. Palbociclib and ribociclib are weak bases so their solubility depends on different pH. The solubility of palbociclib dramatically decreases to < 0.5 mg/ml when pH is above 4,5 but ribociclibs' solubility decreases when pH increases above 6,5. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the effects of concurrent PPIs on palbociclib and ribociclib efficacy in terms of progression-free survival in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We enrolled hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative mBC patients treated with endocrine treatment (letrozole or fulvestrant) combined palbociclib or ribociclib alone or with PPI accompanying our observational study. During palbociclib/ribociclib therapy, patients should be treated with "concurrent PPIs" defined as all or more than half of treatment with palbociclib/ribociclib, If no PPI was applied, it was defined as 'no concurrent PPI', those who used PPI but less than half were excluded from the study. All data was collected from real-life retrospectively.

RESULTS

Our study included 217 patients, 105 of whom received palbociclib and 112 received ribociclib treatment. In the study population CDK inhibitor treatment was added to fulvestrant 102 patients ( 47%), to letrozole 115 patients (53%). In the Palbociclib arm fulvestrant/letrozole ratio was 53.3/46.7%, in the ribociclib arm it was 41.07/58.93%. Of 105 patients who received palbociclib, 65 were on concomitant PPI therapy, 40 were not. Of the 112 patients who received ribociclib, 61 were on concomitant PPI therapy, 51 were not. In the palbociclib group, the PFS of the patients using PPIs was shorter than the PFS of the patients not using (13.04 months vs. unreachable, p < 0.001). It was determined that taking PPIs was an independent predictor of shortening PFS (p < 0.001) in the multivariate analysis, In the ribociclib group, the PFS of the patients using PPIs was shorter than the PFS of the patients not using (12.64 months vs. unreachable, p = 0.003). It was determined that taking PPIs was single statistically independent predictor of shortening PFS (p = 0.003, univariate analysis).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that concomitant usage of PPIs was associated with shorter PFS in mBC treated with both ribociclib and especially palbociclib. If it needs to be used, PPI selection should be made carefully and low-strength PPI or other ARAs (eg H2 antagonists, antacids) should be preferred.

Osimertinib-Centered Therapy Against Uncommon Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer- A Mini Review

Osimertinib is a third-generation, irreversible mutant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA). Osimertinib is currently the first line drug recommended by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines against lung cancer harboring the EGFR TKI-sensitive mutation and acquired EGFR T790M resistance mutation. Osimertinib demonstrated some efficacy in clinical trials and case reports in patients bearing certain uncommon EGFR mutations, but it is not active in patients with other mutations such as C797S. This mini-review presents the mechanisms underlying the variations in patient responses, discusses the use of osimertinib against non-small-cell lung carcinomas with uncommon EGFR mutations, and addresses the future prospects of osimertinib-centered therapy.

Proton Pump Inhibitors and Cancer: Current State of Play

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are one of the most widely used drugs worldwide and are overprescribed in patients with cancer; there is increasing evidence of their effects on cancer development and survival. The objective of this narrative review is to comprehensively identify cancer medications that have clinically meaningful drug–drug interactions (DDIs) with PPIs, including loss of efficacy or adverse effects, and to explore the association between PPIs and cancer.

Methods: A PubMed search of English language studies published from 1 January 2016, to 1 June 2021 was conducted. The search terms included “proton pump inhibitors,” “cancer,” “chemotherapy,” “immunotherapy,” “hormonotherapies,” “targeted therapies,” “tyrosine kinase inhibitors,” and “gut microbiome”. Recent and relevant clinical trials, meta-analyses, and reviews were included.

Results: PPIs may have pro-tumor activity by increasing plasma gastrin levels or anti-tumor activity by inhibiting V-ATPases. However, their impact on cancer survival remains unclear. PPIs may decrease the efficacy of some antineoplastic agents through direct DDIs (e.g., some tyrosine kinase inhibitors, capecitabine, irinotecan, methotrexate). More complex DDIs seem to exist for immunotherapies with indirect interactions through the microbiome. PPIs worsen hypomagnesemia, bone loss, iron, and vitamin B12 deficiencies but may have a protective effect on the renal system.

Discussion/Conclusions: PPIs may interact with the cancer microbiome and the efficacy of various antineoplastic agents, although only a few DDIs involving PPIs are clinically significant. Further pharmaco-epidemiological studies are warranted, but physicians should be aware of the potential consequences of PPI use, which should be dose appropriate and prescribed according to guidelines.

The Influence of CYP3A4 Genetic Polymorphism and Proton Pump Inhibitors on Osimertinib Metabolism

The aim of this study was to 1) investigate the effects of 27 CYP3A4 variants on the metabolism of osimertinib and 2) study the interactions between osimertinib and others as well as the underlying mechanism. A recombinant human CYP3A4 enzymatic incubation system was developed and employed to determine the kinetic profile of CYP3A4 variants. Ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) was applied to detect the concentration of the main metabolite, AZ5104. The results demonstrated that the relative clearance rates of CYP3A4.19, 10, 18, 5, 16, 14, 11, 2, 13, 12, 7, 8, and 17 in catalyzing osimertinib were significantly reduced to a minimum of 25.68% compared to CYP3A4.1, while those of CYP3A4.29, 32, 33, 28, 15, 34, and 3 were obviously enhanced, ranging from 114.14% to 284.52%. The activities of the remaining variants were almost equal to those of CYP3A4.1. In addition, 114 drugs were screened to determine the potential interaction with osimertinib based on the rat liver microsome (RLM) reaction system. Sixteen of them inhibited the production of AZ5104 to 20% or less, especially proton pump inhibitors, among which the IC₅₀ of rabeprazole was 6.49 ± 1.17 μM in RLM and 20.39 ± 2.32 μM in human liver microsome (HLM), with both following competitive and non-competitive mixed mechanism. In an in vivo study, Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats were randomly divided into groups, with six animals per group, receiving osimertinib with or without rabeprazole, omeprazole, and lansoprazole. We found that the AUC_(0–t), AUC_(0–∞), and C_max of osimertinib decreased significantly after co-administration with rabeprazole orally, but they increased remarkably when osimertinib was administered through intraperitoneal injection. Taken together, our data demonstrate that the genetic polymorphism and proton pump inhibitors remarkably influence the disposition of osimertinib, thereby providing basic data for the precise application of osimertinib.

Long-Term Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors in Cancer Patients: An Opinion Paper

Simple Summary

Proton pump inhibitors are frequently used in cancer patients to alleviate some symptoms, epigastric pain or heartburn. However, acid suppression decreases the absorption of some oral-targeted anticancer treatments (tyrosine kinase inhibitors, CDK4/6 inhibitors) and induces changes in the gut microbiome. Recent data are showing that these interactions have important clinical impacts and medical oncologists and patients must be aware of these possible interactions.

Abstract

Multikinase inhibitors (MKIs), and particularly tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs), are currently some of the major breakthroughs in cancer treatment. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) revolutionised the treatment of acid-related diseases, but are frequently overused for epigastric pain or heartburn. However, long-term acid suppression from using PPIs may lead to safety concerns, and could have a greater impact in cancer patients undergoing therapy, like bone fractures, renal toxicities, enteric infections, and micronutrient deficiencies (iron and magnesium). Moreover, acid suppression may also affect the pharmacokinetics of drugs (at least during acid suppression) and decrease the absorption of many molecularly-targeted anticancer therapies, which are mostly weak bases with pH-dependent absorption. This type of drug-drug interaction may have detrimental effects on efficacy, with major clinical impacts described for some orally administrated targeted therapies (erlotinib, gefitinib, pazopanib, palbociclib), and conflicting results with many others, including capecitabine. Furthermore, the long-term use of PPIs results in severe alterations to the gut microbiome and recent retrospective analyses have shown that the benefit of using CPIs was suppressed in patients treated with PPIs. These very expensive drugs are of great importance because of their efficacy. As the use of PPIs is not essential, we must apply the precautionary principle. All these data should encourage medical oncologists to refrain from prescribing PPIs, explaining to patients the risks of interaction in order to prevent inappropriate prescription by another physician.

[Drug-drug interactions of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in treatment of non-small-cell lung carcinoma]

The development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has revolutionized the treatment strategy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer with activating EGFR mutations, ALK or ROS-1 gene rearrangements. The Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency have approved several inhibitors for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer : five tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting EGFR (erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, osimertinib and dacomitinib) and six tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting ALK (crizotinib, céritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, lorlatinib and entrectinib). Interestingly, these tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments are administered orally. While this route of administration improves the treatment flexibility and provides a comfortable and preferable option for patients, it also increases the risk of drug-drug interactions. The latter may result in changes in pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors or their concomitant treatments, with subsequent risks of increasing their toxicity and/or reducing their effectiveness. This review provides an overview of drug-drug interactions with tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting EGFR and ALK, as well as practical recommendations to guide oncologists and clinical pharmacists in the process of managing drug-drug interactions during the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Concomitant Gastric Acid Suppressants on the Survival of Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The influence of concomitant use of gastric acid suppressants (AS) on survival of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is inconsistent according to previous studies. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of additional AS in patients with NSCLC taking TKIs.

METHODS

Relevant observational studies were identified by a search of Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Only studies with multivariate analyses were included. A random-effect model was used to combine the results.

RESULTS

Thirteen retrospective studies with 12259 patients were included. Pooled results showed that concomitant use of AS was associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS, adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31 to 1.89, P < 0.001; I ² = 65%) and overall survival (OS, adjusted HR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.19 to 1.61, P < 0.001; I ² = 70%) in NSCLC patients taking TKIs. Sensitivity analysis limited to studies including NSCLC with EGFR mutation showed consistent results (HR for PFS: 1.53, P=0.003; HR for OS: 1.43, P=0.001). Subgroup analyses indicated that the association between concomitant use of AS and poor survival was not significantly affected by the category of AS used (proton pump inhibitors or histamine type-2 receptor antagonists) or the country of the study (Asian or non-Asian, P for subgroup analysis all >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant use of AS in patients with NSCLC taking TKIs may be associated with poor survival outcomes.

Exploring the Relationship of Drug BCS Classification, Food Effect, and Gastric pH-Dependent Drug Interactions

Food effect (FE) and gastric pH-dependent drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are both absorption-related. Here, we evaluated if Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) classes may be correlated with FE or pH-dependent DDIs. Trends in FE data were investigated for 170 drugs with clinical FE studies from the literature and new drugs approved from 2013 to 2019 by US Food and Drug Administration. A subset of 38 drugs was also evaluated to determine whether FE results can inform the need for a gastric pH-dependent DDI study. The results of FE studies were defined as no effect (AUC ratio 0.80-1.25), increased exposure (AUC ratio ≥1.25), or decreased exposure (AUC ratio ≤0.8). Drugs with significantly increased exposure FE (AUC ratio ≥2.0; N=14) were BCS Class 2 or 4, while drugs with significantly decreased exposure FE (AUC ratio ≤0.5; N=2) were BCS Class 1/3 or 3. The lack of FE was aligned with the lack of a pH-dependent DDI for all 7 BCS Class 1 or 3 drugs as expected. For the 13 BCS Class 2 or 4 weak base drugs with an increased exposure FE, 6 had a pH-dependent DDI (AUC ratio ≤0.8). Among the 16 BCS Class 2 or 4 weak base drugs with no FE, 6 had a pH-dependent DDI (AUC ratio ≤0.8). FE appears to have limited correlation with BCS classes except for BCS Class 1 drugs, confirming that multiple physiological mechanisms can impact FE. Lack of FE does not indicate absence of pH-dependent DDI for BCS Class 2 or 4 drugs. Graphical Abstract.

Clinical study of drug-drug interaction between omeprazole and pyrotinib after meal

AIMS

We aimed to investigate the effect of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of pyrotinib and determine the safety of this combination in healthy Chinese volunteers.

METHODS

Eighteen healthy volunteers were enrolled in this single-dose and self-controlled study. Pyrotinib (400 mg per oral) was administered 30 minutes after the standard meal. Omeprazole was administered from day 6 (D6) to D10 (40 mg, per oral). On D10, the subjects took omeprazole under fasting conditions, followed by pyrotinib 30 minutes after the standard meal. Blood samples for PK analyses in each phase were collected for analysing the drug concentration. Safety was assessed via clinical laboratory tests and physical examinations.

RESULTS

Compared with a single dose of pyrotinib, pyrotinib coadministered with omeprazole showed no significant difference in exposure, elimination, half-life and apparent clearance rate. The mixed-effects model revealed that the least-squares geometric mean ratios of area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)_0-t , AUC_0-∞ and maximum plasma concentration (C_max, 90% confidence intervals) of pyrotinib alone and pyrotinib coadministered with omeprazole were 0.94 (0.82, 1.08), 0.94 (0.83, 1.08) and 0.91 (0.806, 1.038), respectively, indicating the absence of significant differences in AUC_0-t , AUC_0-∞ and C_max . During the treatment period, 6 subjects (33.3%) reported 8 adverse events during pyrotinib monotherapy and omeprazole administration, respectively; 10 subjects (55.6%) reported 34 adverse events in the combined administration phase.

CONCLUSION

Omeprazole, a proton-pump inhibitor, did not significantly impact the PK properties of pyrotinib, and a good safety profile was observed on coadministration.

Interactions between epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and proton-pump inhibitors/histamine type-2 receptor antagonists in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are increasingly used for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as first-line therapy. The bioavailability and efficacy of oral EGFR-TKIs could be affected by acid suppression (AS) therapy such as PPIs and H2RAs which are reported to be over-prescribed. Hence, there is a need to investigate the effect of AS on the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse effect profile in patients treated with EGFR TKIs.

Methods

An electronic database search of Medline and Embase was performed following PRISMA guidelines on 17 January 2021. Studies analyzing interactions between EGFR TKIs and PPIs/H2RAs in NSCLC patients were included. Abstracts, non-English or non-Japanese studies or studies using non-EGFR TKIs were excluded. Hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled using generic inverse variance random effects model. Effect sizes for dichotomous variables were pooled using Mantel-Haenszel random effects model. Significance was considered at P≤0.05. Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochran Q-test and I2 test. Publication bias was assessed with funnel plots. The assessment of quality and risk of bias of randomized and non-randomized studies were undertaken with RoB 2 and the ROBINS-I tool respectively.

Results

Out of 1,173 potentially relevant articles, 14 articles were included in the final analysis. The pooled prevalence of AS in patients taking EGFR TKI was 30.71% in 4,010 individuals. Patients who were treated only with EGFR TKI had significantly better OS (HR =1.46, 95% CI: 1.27–1.72; P<0.00001) and PFS (HR =1.63, 95% CI: 1.35–1.98; P<0.00001). The OS for EGFR mutation positive patients only was as similarly significant as the OS in all patients taking EGFR TKI, while the PFS in mutation positive patients was significantly worsened with AS. PPIs resulted in a significantly worsened OS and PFS but H2RAs did not produce significantly different OS and PFS between AS and non-AS users. There were no significant differences in the incidence of rash (OR =0.81, 95% CI: 0.50–1.32; P=0.40), diarrhoea (OR =1.03, 95% CI: 0.63–1.67; P=0.91) or other adverse effects.

Conclusions

Co-administration of AS medications with first-generation EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC worsens survival outcomes. Physicians should only prescribe AS medications when absolutely clinically indicated.

Osimertinib: A Review in Previously Untreated, EGFR Mutation-Positive, Advanced NSCLC

Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene have been identified as key oncogenic drivers of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Osimertinib (Tagrisso^®) is an orally administered, third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that is widely approved for the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations. In the pivotal phase III FLAURA trial, osimertinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) relative to first-generation EGFR-TKIs in patients with previously untreated, EGFR mutation-positive, advanced NSCLC. Osimertinib also significantly prolonged central nervous system (CNS) PFS in patients with CNS metastases at trial entry. Osimertinib had a generally manageable tolerability profile; the majority of adverse events considered to be possibly related to treatment were of mild to moderate severity. Osimertinib represents a valuable targeted therapeutic for use in adults with previously untreated, EGFR mutation-positive, advanced NSCLC.

Drug-drug interactions between palbociclib and proton pump inhibitors may significantly affect clinical outcome of metastatic breast cancer patients

Background

Proton-pump-inhibitors (PPIs) are frequently prescribed for the management of anticancer drug-related gastrointestinal symptoms. Palbociclib is a weak base with pH-dependent solubility and potential drug-drug interaction at the absorption level may affect clinical pharmacokinetics. The current study was aimed at investigating the effect of co-administration of PPIs and palbociclib on progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients.

Patients and methods

Patients affected by estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative mBC, who were candidates for first-line treatment with palbociclib, were enrolled in this retrospective observational study. Patients were defined as ‘no concomitant PPIs’ if no PPIs were administered during palbociclib treatment, and as ‘concomitant PPIs’ if the administration of PPIs covered the entire or not less than two-thirds of treatment with palbociclib. All clinical interventions were made according to clinical practice.

Results

A total of 112 patients were enrolled in the study; 56 belonged to the ‘no concomitant PPIs’ group and 56 to the ‘concomitant PPIs’ group. Seventy-one patients were endocrine-sensitive and received palbociclib and letrozole, and 43 were endocrine-resistant and were treated with palbociclib and fulvestrant. The most prescribed PPI was lansoprazole. Patients taking PPIs had a shorter PFS than those taking palbociclib and endocrine therapy alone (14.0 versus 37.9 months, P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis confirmed concomitant PPIs as the only independent predictive factor for shorter PFS (P = 0.0002). PFS was significantly longer in estrogen-sensitive mBC with no concomitant PPIs compared with patients taking PPIs or estrogen-resistant patients, with and without PPIs (P < 0.0001). No correlation with adverse events was found when considering grade >2 hematological toxicities [Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) scale].

Conclusions

The present study demonstrates that concomitant use of PPIs in mBC patients treated with palbociclib has a detrimental effect on PFS. Therefore, it is recommended to prescribe PPIs with caution in these patients, strictly adhering to the indications in the summary of product characteristics (RCP).

•

PPIs are widely used in cancer patients to manage chemotherapy-related gastrointestinal adverse events.

•

Palbociclib is a weak base with a pH-dependent solubility.

•

Breast cancer patients treated with palbociclib and PPIs have significantly shorter PFS.

•

Drug-drug interactions should be clearly evaluated in patients taking PPIs.

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic effects of itraconazole on alflutinib (AST2818): an open-label, single-center, single-sequence, two-period randomized study in healthy volunteers

Alflutinib (AST2818) is a newly developed third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of lung cancer patients with T790M-resistant mutations. It is metabolized mainly by the CYP3A4 enzyme. At the same time, it has the potential to induce CYP3A4. In this study, we aimed to estimate the effect of itraconazole (a strong inhibitor of CYP3A4) on the pharmacokinetics of alflutinib. For this aim, a single-center, open-label, single-sequence, two-period trial was designed. The pharmacokinetic parameters of AST2818 and its active metabolite AST5902 were established from blood concentration measurements, and adverse events (AEs) of two periods of treatment were documented. For AST2818, the C_max, AUC_0-t, and AUC_0-∞ in period II (coadministration of itraconazole) increased by 6.5 ng/mL, 1263.0 h*ng/mL, and 1067.0 h*ng/mL, respectively. And the corresponding 90% CIs were 1.23 (1.14-1.32), 2.41 (2.29-2.54), and 2.22 (2.11-2.34), respectively. The C_max, AUC_0-t, and AUC_0-∞ of AST5902 in period II decreased by 4.849 ng/mL, 415.60 h*ng/mL, and 391.4 h*ng/mL, respectively. Moreover, the corresponding 90% CIs were 0.09 (0.08-0.10), 0.18 (0.17-0.19), and 0.14 (0.13-0.15), respectively. Nonetheless, in period II, plasma concentrations of total active components (AST2818 and AST5902) changed marginally. The AUC_0-∞ of total active components increased 60%, and the corresponding C_max increased 8%. Possible treatment-related AEs assessed by investigators were fewer in period II (23.3% vs 36.7%). In conclusion, the total exposure of AST2818 and active metabolite AST5902 increased following the coadministration of itraconazole, but it was still safe and well-tolerated.

Controversial link between proton pump inhibitors and anticancer agents: review of the literature

Drug-drug interactions represent a topic of great interest, not only due to the risk of unexpected adverse events but also due to the possibility of altering the effectiveness of a specific treatment. Inappropriate or concomitant use of drugs can often lead to changes in the bioavailability of various compounds, resulting in pharmacokinetic alterations. A recent example is the concomitant administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and anticancer agents. PPIs are overused beyond their classic indications, resulting in a high risk of interactions with other drugs, such as anticancer agents, both PO and intravenous. However, the real clinical impact of concomitant acid suppression therapy and anticancer therapies remains controversial and is not yet fully understood. Certainly, the gut microbiota plays a key role in regulating the response of the immune system, and PPIs can significantly alter the gut microbiome, resulting in gut dysbiosis. Indeed, while the link sometimes appears to lead to negative outcomes, as in the case of immunotherapy, oral capecitabine, or tyrosine kinase inhibitors, in other cases, it seems to enhance the effectiveness of intravenous chemotherapy. In this review, I analyse the possible drug interactions between PPIs and the main classes of anticancer drugs.

An overview of osimertinib as a treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): an update

Introduction: Osimertinib is a third-generation anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), that irreversibly binds to mutant EGFR, specifically to the T790M EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Since its approval, osimertinib has been tested in multiple scenarios, including the first-line and adjuvant setting of EGFR-mutant disease.Areas covered: The authors summarize the most recent evidence about osimertinib in NSCLC, covering its use as a first-line therapy, its activity on central nervous system metastatic disease, and in elderly patients. Moreover, the authors focus on resistance to this drug and on the therapeutic strategies that may be used to overcome this issue.Expert opinion: Osimertinib is a key player in the treatment ofEGFR mutant NSCLC and will probably be used in earlier clinical settings in the future, giving rise to an emerging variety of resistance mechanisms. These could be potentially overcome in several ways: e.g. as an oligo-progressive disease local therapy, maintaining osimertinib might be a reasonable option; however, for widespread progressive disease, a switch to chemotherapy should be considered. Finally, either liquid biopsy or tissue biopsy might be considered in patients progressing to osimertinib, as they can lead to the identification of potentially targetable resistance mechanisms.

Proton Pump Inhibitors and Oncologic Treatment Efficacy: A Practical Review of the Literature for Oncologists

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most commonly used anti-acid drugs worldwide, including among cancer patients. However, drug-drug interactions between PPIs and other agents may lead to decreased drug absorption with possible reduced therapeutic benefit, or even increased toxicity. Unfortunately, only scarce data exist regarding the safety of concomitant PPI use with anti-cancer agents. We aim at reviewing current evidence on this possible interaction by dividing anti-cancer agents by class. Until further data is available, we encourage healthcare providers to limit unnecessary PPI overuse.

Determination of intracellular anlotinib, osimertinib, afatinib and gefitinib accumulations in human brain microvascular endothelial cells by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry

RATIONALE

Brain metastases are a common complication in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Anlotinib hydrochloride is a novel multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) exhibiting a superior overall response rate for brain metastases from NSCLC. The penetrability of anlotinib and three generations of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) TKIs (osimertinib, afatinib and gefitinib) into brain microvascular endothelial cells (HBMECs) was compared.

METHODS

A sensitive quantification method for the four TKIs was developed using liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). Anlotinib and the three EGFR TKIs were separated on an ACQUITY BEH C18 column after a direct protein precipitation, and then analyzed using electrospray ionization in positive ion mode. The linearity, accuracy, precision, limit of quantification, specificity and stability were assessed.

RESULTS

The four analytes could be efficiently quantified in a single run of 3.8 min. The validation parameters of all analytes satisfy the acceptance criteria of bioanalytical method guidelines. The calibration range was 0.2-200 ng mL^-1 for anlotinib and gefitinib, 1-500 ng mL^-1 for osimertinib and 1-200 ng mL^-1 for afatinib. The penetration of anlotinib across HBMECs was comparable with that of afatinib and gefitinib but less than that of osimertinib.

CONCLUSIONS

A sensitive LC/MS/MS method to simultaneously measure anlotinib, osimertinib, afatinib and gefitinib in cell extracts was successfully validated and applied to determine their uptake inside HBMECs, which could pave the way for future research on the role of anlotinib in NSCLC brain metastases.

Clinical implications of food-drug interactions with small-molecule kinase inhibitors

During the past two decades, small-molecule kinase inhibitors have proven to be valuable in the treatment of solid and haematological tumours. However, because of their oral administration, the intrapatient and interpatient exposure to small-molecule kinase inhibitors (SMKIs) is highly variable and is affected by many factors, such as concomitant use of food and herbs. Food-drug interactions are capable of altering the systemic bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of these drugs. The most important mechanisms underlying food-drug interactions are gastrointestinal drug absorption and hepatic metabolism through cytochrome P450 isoenzymes. As food-drug interactions can lead to therapy failure or severe toxicity, knowledge of these interactions is essential. This Review provides a comprehensive overview of published studies involving food-drug interactions and herb-drug interactions for all registered SMKIs up to Oct 1, 2019. We critically discuss US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidelines concerning food-drug interactions and offer clear recommendations for their management in clinical practice.

Impact of Use of Gastric-Acid Suppressants and Oral Anti-Cancer Agents on Survival Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the role of gastric acid suppressant use on outcomes of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and oral chemotherapy. We identified all research evaluating the effect of GAS (gastric acid suppressants) use on patients receiving oral chemotherapy or TKIs for solid tumors. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated with a fixed-effects or a random effects model. The study population included n = 16 retrospective studies and 372,418 patients. The series concerned gastrointestinal tract tumors (n = 5 studies), renal cell carcinomas (RCC, n = 3 studies), non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC, n = 5 studies), and soft tissue sarcomas or mixed histologies solid tumors in n = 3 studies. The pooled HRs for OS and PFS were 1.31 (95%CI: 1.20-1.43; p < 0.01) and 1.3 (95%CI 1.07-1.57; p < 0.01) for GAS and no GAS users, respectively. Only studies of EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) mutated NSCLC patients receiving TKIs and those with colorectal cancer receiving oral chemotherapy showed a significant correlation between GAS and poor survival. Our study supports the evidence of a possible negative impact of concomitant GAS therapy on survival outcomes of patients receiving oral anti-cancer drugs.

FDA- and EMA-Approved Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Advanced EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Safety, Tolerability, Plasma Concentration Monitoring, and Management

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common form of primary lung cancer. The discovery of several oncogenic driver mutations in patients with NSCLC has allowed the development of personalized treatments based on these specific molecular alterations, in particular in the tyrosine kinase (TK) domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene. Gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, and osimertinib are TK inhibitors (TKIs) that specifically target EGFR and are currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) as first line treatment for sensitive EGFR-mutant patients. However, these four drugs are associated with severe adverse events (AEs) that can significantly impact patient health-related quality of life and patient monitoring. EGFR-TKIs are commonly used together with other types of medication that can substantially interact. Here, we review approaches used for the management of TKI-AEs in patients with advanced NSCLC to promote the benefits of treatments and minimize the risk of TKI treatment discontinuation. We also consider potential TKI–drug interactions and discuss the usefulness of plasma concentration monitoring TKIs based on chromatographic and mass spectrometry approaches to guide clinical decision-making. Adjusting the most appropriate therapeutic strategies and drug doses may improve the performance therapy and prognosis of patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Concurrent proton-pump inhibitors increase risk of death for lung cancer patients receiving 1st-line gefitinib treatment - a nationwide population-based study

Purpose

Concurrent proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use might reduce the plasma concentration of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). Clinically, the adverse effect of PPIs on patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with first-line EGFR TKIs remains controversial. This study was conducted to evaluate whether the combined use of gefitinib with PPIs affected NSCLC outcomes.

Patients and methods

We performed a nationwide cohort study of patients newly diagnosed with NSCLC between 1997 and 2013 using the Taiwan Cancer Registry and Taiwan National Health Insurance databases. We identified patients who were treated with first-line EGFR TKIs and analyzed the association between use of PPIs and TKI treatment outcome. We defined the coverage ratio of PPIs as duration of PPI treatment in days divided by duration of TKIs in days. Patients who exhibited an overlap of >20% between PPI and TKI usage days were defined as having a high coverage ratio.

Results

A total of 1278 patients were treated with first-line gefitinib, 309 of which took PPIs at the same time and 145 had a high PPI coverage ratio. Patients had similar time to failure regardless of their PPI coverage ratio during gefitinib treatment. However, higher PPI coverage ratio significantly decreased overall survival (OS) compared with that of patients with a lower PPI coverage ratio or no PPI treatment in univariate analysis (median OS, 13.5, 16.7, and 21.8 months, respectively, p<0.01) and multivariate analyses (high coverage ratio HR: 1.67; low coverage ratio HR: 1.29). Exposure to PPIs during first line gefitinib treatment significantly decreased overall survival of patients with NSCLC.

Conclusion

Concurrent use of PPIs was associated with lower overall survival in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC under first-line gefitinib treatment.

Comparative review of drug-drug interactions with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer

The development of small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has revolutionized the management of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because these drugs are commonly used in combination with other types of medication, the risk of clinically significant drug–drug interactions (DDIs) is an important consideration, especially for patients using multiple drugs for coexisting medical conditions. Clinicians need to be aware of the potential for clinically important DDIs when considering therapeutic options for individual patients. In this article, we describe the main mechanisms underlying DDIs with the EGFR-TKIs that are currently approved for the treatment of NSCLC, and, specifically, the potential for interactions mediated via effects on gastrointestinal pH, cytochrome P450-dependent metabolism, uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase, and transporter proteins. We review evidence of such DDIs with the currently approved EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, osimertinib, and icotinib) and discuss several information sources that are available online to aid clinical decision-making. We conclude by summarizing the most clinically relevant DDIs with these EFGR-TKIs and provide recommendations for managing, minimizing, or avoiding DDIs with the different agents.

Pharmacokinetic Study of Osimertinib in Cancer Patients with Mild or Moderate Hepatic Impairment

Osimertinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), undergoes significant hepatic elimination. In this phase 1 study, we assessed the effects of mild and moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of osimertinib in patients with malignant solid tumors. In part A, patients with normal hepatic function, mild hepatic impairment, and moderate hepatic impairment, according to the Child-Pugh classification, received a single 80 mg oral dose of osimertinib. Standard PK measures were assessed. In part B, patients could continue osimertinib treatment if deemed clinically appropriate. We compared these study results with a population PK analysis including other osimertinib clinical studies. Geometric mean osimertinib plasma concentrations were lower in patients with mild (n = 7) or moderate hepatic impairment (n = 5) versus normal hepatic function (n = 10): C max was reduced to 51% and 61%, respectively; area under the curve was reduced to 63% and 68%, respectively. PK results for the metabolites were similar. No apparent differences in the safety profile were found between patients with normal hepatic function and patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. Comparison of these study results with National Cancer Institute-Organ Dysfunction Working Group criteria from population PK analysis showed osimertinib exposure was not affected by hepatic impairment. No dose adjustment is required for osimertinib when treating patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. No apparent differences in the safety of osimertinib were found between patients with normal hepatic function and mild or moderate hepatic impairment.

Absolute Bioavailability of Osimertinib in Healthy Adults

Osimertinib is a third-generation, central nervous system-active, epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) selective for EGFR-TKI sensitizing and T790M resistance mutations. This phase 1, open-label study (NCT02491944) investigated absolute bioavailability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral and intravenous (IV) osimertinib. Ten healthy subjects (21-61 years) received a single oral 80-mg dose concomitantly with a 100 μg (containing 1 μCi) IV microtracer dose of [¹⁴ C]osimertinib. Oral and IV PK were determined simultaneously for osimertinib and its active metabolites, AZ5104 and AZ7550. High-performance liquid chromatography and accelerator mass spectrometry were used to characterize IV dose PK. Geometric mean absolute oral bioavailability of osimertinib was 69.8% (90% confidence interval, 66.7, 72.9). Oral osimertinib was slowly absorbed (median time to maximum plasma concentration [t_max ] 7.0 hours). Following t_max , plasma concentrations fell in an apparent monophasic manner. IV clearance and volume of distribution were 16.8 L/h and 1285 L, respectively. Arithmetic mean elimination half-life estimates were 59.7, 52.6, and 72.6 hours for osimertinib, AZ5104, and AZ7550, respectively (oral dosing), and 54.9, 68.4, and 99.7 hours for [¹⁴ C]osimertinib, [¹⁴ C]AZ5104, and [¹⁴ C]AZ7550, respectively (IV dosing). Oral osimertinib was well absorbed. Simultaneous IV and oral PK analysis proved useful for complete understanding of osimertinib PK and showed that the first-pass effect was minimal for osimertinib.

Osimertinib

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated (exons 18-21) advanced non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) are generally characterized by exquisite sensitivity to treatment with an EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (-TKI). First-generation or reversible EGFR-TKIs include gefitinib and erlotinib, while, more recently, second-generation or irreversible EGFR-TKIs have been developed, namely afatinib and dacomitinib, with the aim of overcoming/delaying acquired resistance to treatment. Nevertheless, clinical trials have shown that resistance eventually emerges after a median time of slightly less than one year, regardless of whether first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs are used. In this context, a secondary EGFR mutation in exon 20, namely T790M, has been found to be responsible for approximately 60% of cases of acquired resistance. Alternatively, T790M resistance mutation can be found de novo, in which case it limits the antitumor activity of both first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs. Osimertinb is an orally bioavailable, third-generation EGFR-TKI that acts by irreversibly binding both EGFR activating mutations and T790M, while sparing wild-type EGFR. On this basis, osimertinib has proven more efficacious than platinum-based chemotherapy in the setting of EGFR T790M-positive NSCLCs pretreated with a first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI. More recently, in another phase 3 trial, osimertinib outperformed gefitinib or erlotinib as first-line treatment of EGFR-mutated (ex19del or L858R) advanced NSCLCs, thus emerging as a new standard of care in this setting. In the present review, we will discuss the preclinical and clinical development of osimertinib, briefly touching upon its activity in special populations and biomarkers of sensitivity to treatment.