Influence of Renal Function on Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of a Single Dose of Romosozumab

Romosozumab for managing severe osteoporosis in patients undergoing kidney transplantation: a retrospective case series

Recipients of kidney grafts often develop severe osteoporosis. However, no consensus has emerged on the most appropriate medications for managing osteoporosis in these recipients. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of romosozumab as an additional treatment option for managing severe osteoporosis in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Our retrospective observational study included 12 such recipients who were treated with romosozumab for 12 mo-8 newly initiated on romosozumab and 4 treated with romosozumab after initial treatment with other agents. Endpoints were side effects, new fractures, blood tests, and changes in BMD. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess associations of the percent change in bone mineral density after 1 yr of treatment with age, dialysis duration, and time (yr) since transplantation. During treatment with romosozumab, the patients did not develop severe hypocalcemia or experience marked deterioration of kidney function at 1 yr post-treatment. Metabolic markers of bone formation and resorption were similar to those in the general population with osteoporosis. The average changes in BMD at the spine and total hip were 15.18% and 8.83%, respectively, indicating a favorable increase. Further, the change in spine BMD was inversely correlated with age and time since transplantation. Treatment of osteoporosis with romosozumab was observed to be safe for KTRs and had a favorable therapeutic effect on both spine and hip BMD.

Combined Romosozumab and Raloxifene treatment targets impaired bone quality in a male murine model of diabetic kidney disease

Comorbid diabetes and chronic kidney disease create a complex disease state with multi-faceted impacts on bone health, primarily reduced bone mass and tissue quality. To reduce fracture risk in this growing population, interventions are needed that target both bone mass and quality. Romosozumab (Romo) is an FDA-approved sclerostin inhibitor that has been shown to increase bone mass and strength in a murine model of combined diabetes and CKD (DKD), while Raloxifene (RAL) is a mild anti-resorptive used to treat osteoporosis that has also been shown to increase bone mechanical properties by increasing bone bound water content. We aimed to test whether combined RAL and Romo treatment could improve bone quality in our murine model of DKD more than either treatment alone. Using a previously established streptozotocin- and adenine-diet-induced model, male, C57BL/6J mice were randomly divided into four treatment groups and given daily subcutaneous injections of 100 μL vehicle (phosphorus buffered saline, PBS) or 0.5 mg/kg RAL. In addition, two groups were also given a weekly dose of Romo (10 mg/kg). Overall, Romo increased whole-bone strength and RAL improved tissue-level mechanical properties. Combined RAL-Romo treatment led to significantly higher cortical and trabecular bone mass compared to untreated controls. These morphological improvements created corresponding improvements in cortical bending strength and vertebral trabecular compression strength. These results suggest that combined RAL-Romo treatment provides both mass and quality improvements to DKD bone.

The effects of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus on bone health in chronic kidney disease

Fracture is an under-recognized but common complication of diabetes mellitus, with an incidence approaching twofold in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and up to sevenfold in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) compared with that in the general population. Both T1DM and T2DM induce chronic hyperglycaemia, leading to the accumulation of advanced glycosylation end products that affect osteoblast function, increased collagen crosslinking and a senescence phenotype promoting inflammation. Together with an increased incidence of microvascular disease and an increased risk of vitamin D deficiency, these factors reduce bone quality, thereby increasing bone fragility. In T1DM, reduced anabolic stimuli as well as the presence of autoimmune conditions might also contribute to reduced bone mass and increased fragility. Diabetes mellitus is the most common cause of kidney failure, and fracture risk is exacerbated when chronic kidney disease (CKD)-related mineral and bone disorders are superimposed on diabetic changes. Microvascular pathology, cortical thinning and trabecular deterioration are particularly prominent in patients with T1DM and CKD, who suffer more fragility fractures than do other patients with CKD. This Review explores the pathophysiology of bone fragility in patients with diabetes mellitus and CKD and discusses techniques to predict fracture and pharmacotherapy that might reduce fracture risk.

Romosozumab for the treatment of osteoporosis - a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Romosozumab, a new treatment of osteoporosis, is a monoclonal antibody that targets sclerostin and thereby exhibits a dual mechanism of action by stimulating bone formation and inhibiting bone resorption. This systematic review aims to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of romosozumab for treatment of primary and secondary osteoporosis.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in October 2023 across multiple databases including Embase, PubMed and Cochrane Library. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating the impact of romosozumab on BMD, bone turnover markers (BTM), fracture outcomes, and its safety profile were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 36 articles met the inclusion criteria. Romosozumab significantly increased BMD at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck compared to placebo and active comparators in patients with primary osteoporosis. Sequential therapy with romosozumab followed by antiresorptives maintained or further increased BMD and reduced fracture risk. Romosozumab was generally well tolerated, however, an imbalance in cardiovascular adverse event was observed in one large clinical trial. Observational studies supported these findings. Specific subgroups of patients with secondary osteoporosis were assessed, demonstrating overall positive outcomes with romosozumab treatment.

CONCLUSION

Romosozumab effectively increases BMD and reduces fracture risk, particularly when used as initial therapy in high fracture-risk patients. Sequential therapy with subsequent antiresorptive treatment optimizes long-term benefits. While generally well-tolerated, its cardiovascular safety profile requires further long-term studies to ensure its safety in clinical practice. Additional studies are needed to confirm efficacy and safety in patients with secondary osteoporosis.

Τhe story of sclerostin inhibition: the past, the present, and the future

Sclerostin inhibits osteoblast activity by hampering activation of the canonical Wnt signaling pathway and simultaneously stimulates osteoclastogenesis through upregulation of the receptor activator of NFκB ligand (RANKL). Thus, antibodies against sclerostin (Scl-Abs), besides promoting bone formation, suppress bone resorption and dissociate bone formation from resorption. This dual action results in remarkable increases of bone mineral density which are of a greater magnitude compared to the other antiosteoporotic treatments and are accompanied by decreases of fracture risk at all skeletal sites. The anabolic effect subsides after the first few months of treatment and a predominantly antiresorptive effect remains after this period, limiting its use to 12 months. Furthermore, these effects are largely reversible upon discontinuation; therefore, subsequent treatment with antiresorptives is indicated to maintain or further increase the bone gains achieved. Romosozumab is currently the only Scl-Ab approved for the treatment of severe postmenopausal osteoporosis. Indications for use in other populations, such as males, premenopausal women, and patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, are pending. Additionally, the efficacy of Scl-Abs in other bone diseases, such as osteogenesis imperfecta, hypophosphatasia, X-linked hypophosphatemia, and bone loss associated with malignancies, is under thorough investigation. Cardiovascular safety concerns currently exclude patients at high cardiovascular risk from this treatment.

Romosozumab adverse event profile: a pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 2019 to 2023

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to analyze adverse drug events (ADE) related to romosozumab from the second quarter of 2019 to the third quarter of 2023 from FAERS database.

METHODS

The ADE data related to romosozumab from 2019 Q2 to 2023 Q3 were collected. After data normalization, four signal strength quantification algorithms were used: ROR (Reporting Odds Ratios), PRR (Proportional Reporting Ratios), BCPNN (Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network), and EBGM (Empirical Bayesian Geometric Mean).

RESULTS

Screening for romosozumab-related AEs (adverse events) included 23 system organ categories (SOCs). PT (preferred terms) levels were screened for adverse drug reaction (ADR) signals. A total of 7055 reports with romosozumab as the primary suspect (PS) and 14,041 PTs induced by romosozumab as PS were identified. Common significant signals of general disorders and administration site conditions, musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders have emerged. Specifically, unexpected AEs such as gastrointestinal disorder, respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders also occur. Notably, fracture (n = 503, ROR = 107.8, PRR = 103.83, IC = 6.6, EBGM = 97.02) and bone density abnormal (n = 429, ROR = 343.65, PRR = 332.77, IC = 8.08, EBGM = 271.34) exhibited relatively high occurrence rates and signal strengths.

CONCLUSION

Our study identifies potential new AE signals and provides broader data support for the safety of romosozumab. In clinical application, doctors are provided with a warning to closely monitor adverse reactions to support their rational use in diseases such as osteoporosis.

A practical approach for anabolic treatment of bone fragility with romosozumab

BACKGROUND

Romosozumab, a fully humanized anti-sclerostin-antibody, is a bone-builder stimulating osteoblasts and inhibiting osteoclast by activation of the canonical Wnt-beta catenin signaling. This unique mechanism of action has the potential to address unmet needs in osteoporosis management.

METHODS

The multifaceted practical clinical issues related to romosozumab are discussed, especially focusing on the rationale of employing a sclerostin inhibitor to target bone fragility as first line or second line treatment in post-menopausal osteoporosis and in males at increased risk of fractures.

RESULTS

Four randomized clinical trials with several post-hoc analyses and more than ten observational studies have consistently demonstrated that romosozumab is effective in rapidly increasing bone mineral density (BMD) and decreasing risk of vertebral, non-vertebral and hip fractures in post-menopausal women at very-high risk of fractures. In male osteoporosis, only data on BMD are available. Noteworthy, romosozumab was shown to be more effective and rapid than teriparatide in improving BMD, bone structure and strength at the hip, especially in women already treated with anti-resorptive drugs. Interestingly, even if romosozumab displays best results in treatment-naïve patients, its favourable effects on BMD were observed even in women previously treated with teriparatide or denosumab, although to a lesser extent.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available evidence, romosozumab could be proposed as ideal drug in several clinical settings, such as non-fractured post-menopausal women at very-high risk of fractures, patients with recent hip fracture, patients non responder to bisphosphonates and short-term denosumab therapy.

Extending the Therapeutic Potential: Romosozumab in Osteoporosis Management

Current therapeutic approaches for osteoporosis predominantly involve antiresorptive agents, but the emergence of bone anabolic therapy, such as romosozumab, presents a promising alternative. Romosozumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting sclerostin, exhibits both bone anabolic and antiresorptive effects, offering the potential to enhance bone mineral density and mitigate fracture risk. Evidence from several studies demonstrating the efficacy of romosozumab is now established in improving bone mineral density and reducing fracture rates in postmenopausal women and men. This review critically evaluates the role of romosozumab in osteoporosis management, emphasizing findings from real-world studies to facilitate its practical application in clinical settings. Adverse effects, comparative effectiveness with other osteoporotic agents, and challenges in sequential therapy are also discussed, providing insights for informed decision-making by physicians, particularly in the context of pre-treatment considerations. Additionally, the review examines global prescribing guidelines and highlights challenges associated with romosozumab utilization in special patient subgroups, aiming to optimize its clinical use.

Romosozumab versus parathyroid hormone receptor agonists: which osteoanabolic to choose and when?

Osteoanabolic agents are used as a first line treatment in patients at high fracture risk. The PTH receptor 1 (PTH1R) agonists teriparatide (TPTD) and abaloparatide (ABL) increase bone formation, bone mineral density (BMD), and bone strength by activating PTH receptors on osteoblasts. Romosozumab (ROMO), a humanized monoclonal antibody against sclerostin, dramatically but transiently stimulates bone formation and persistently reduces bone resorption. Osteoanabolic agents increase BMD and bone strength while being more effective than antiresorptives in reducing fracture risk in postmenopausal women. However, direct comparisons of the antifracture benefits of osteoanabolic therapies are limited. In a direct comparison of TPTD and ABL, the latter resulted in greater BMD increases at the hip. While no differences in vertebral or non-vertebral fracture risk were observed between the two drugs, ABL led to a greater reduction of major osteoporotic fractures. Adverse event profiles were similar between the two agents except for hypercalcemia, which occurred more often with TPTD. No direct comparisons of fracture risk reduction between ROMO and the PTH1R agonists exist. Individual studies have shown greater increases in BMD and bone strength with ROMO compared with TPTD in treatment-naive women and in women previously treated with bisphosphonates. Some safety aspects, such as a history of tumor precluding the use of PTH1R agonists, and a history of major cardiovascular events precluding the use of ROMO, should also be considered when choosing between these agents. Finally, convenience of administration, reimbursement by national health systems and length of clinical experience may influence patient choice.

Romosozumab rescues impaired bone mass and strength in a murine model of diabetic kidney disease

As international incidence of diabetes and diabetes-driven comorbidities such as chronic kidney disease (CKD) continue to climb, interventions are needed that address the high-risk skeletal fragility of what is a complex disease state. Romosozumab (Romo) is an FDA-approved sclerostin inhibitor that has been shown to increase bone mineral density and decrease fracture rates in osteoporotic patients with mild to severe CKD, but its effect on diabetes-weakened bone is unknown. We aimed to test Romo's performance in a model of combined diabetes and CKD. 6-week old male C57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into control (CON) and disease model (STZ-Ad) groups, using a previously established streptozotocin- and adenine-diet-induced model. After 16 weeks of disease induction, both CON and STZ-Ad groups were subdivided into two treatment groups and given weekly subcutaneous injections of 100 μL vehicle (phosphorus buffered saline, PBS) or 10 mg/kg Romo. Mice were euthanized after 4 weeks of treatment via cardiac exsanguination and cervical dislocation. Hindlimb bones and L4 vertebrae were cleaned of soft tissue, wrapped in PBS-soaked gauze and stored at -20C. Right tibiae, femora, and L4s were scanned via microcomputed tomography; tibiae were then tested to failure in 4-pt bending while L4s were compression tested. Romo treatment significantly increased cortical and trabecular bone mass in both STZ-Ad and CON animals. These morphological improvements created corresponding increases in cortical bending strength and trabecular compression strength, with STZ-Ad treated mice surpassing vehicle CON mice in all trabecular mechanics measures. These results suggest that Romo retains its efficacy at increasing bone mass and strength in diabetic kidney disease.

Osteoporosis: Spotlight on current approaches to pharmacological treatment

Despite the availability of safe and effective anti-osteoporosis treatments, osteoporosis continues to be undertreated. The increase in fragility fractures, which is the main clinical consequence of osteoporosis, is a major problem for healthcare systems of countries. A broad range of drugs including antiresorptive and anabolic agents are used in the pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis. Fracture risk assessment in drug selection is of utmost importance in terms of guiding treatment. The recommended thresholds for osteoporosis treatment decision making are based on major osteoporotic and hip fracture probabilities from the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®). Currently, antiresorptive agents are usually the first choice to increase bone mineral density (BMD) and reduce the fracture risk. Bisphosphonates and antiresorptive drugs such as denosumab, a nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) inhibitor, are the most widely used drugs in the treatment of osteoporosis. Bisphosphonates alone are unlikely to provide long-term protection against fracture and restore BMD in patients with severe osteoporosis and high fracture risk. In such patients, treatment with an anabolic agent such as teriparatide, abaloparatide, or romosozumab should be ideally initiated to achieve maximal gain in bone mass and preserve the microarchitecture. Ideally, an antiresorptive drug should be continued to maintain gain in bone mass.

Management of fracture risk in CKD-traditional and novel approaches

The coexistence of osteoporosis and chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an evolving healthcare challenge in the face of increasingly aging populations. Globally, accelerating fracture incidence causes disability, impaired quality of life and increased mortality. Consequently, several novel diagnostic and therapeutic tools have been introduced for treatment and prevention of fragility fractures. Despite an especially high fracture risk in CKD, these patients are commonly excluded from interventional trials and clinical guidelines. While management of fracture risk in CKD has been discussed in recent opinion-based reviews and consensus papers in the nephrology literature, many patients with CKD stages 3-5D and osteoporosis are still underdiagnosed and untreated. The current review addresses this potential treatment nihilism by discussing established and novel approaches to diagnosis and prevention of fracture risk in patients with CKD stages 3-5D. Skeletal disorders are common in CKD. A wide variety of underlying pathophysiological processes have been identified, including premature aging, chronic wasting, and disturbances in vitamin D and mineral metabolism, which may impact bone fragility beyond established osteoporosis. We discuss current and emerging concepts of CKD-mineral and bone disorders (CKD-MBD) and integrate management of osteoporosis in CKD with current recommendations for management of CKD-MBD. While many diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to osteoporosis can be applied to patients with CKD, some limitations and caveats need to be considered. Consequently, clinical trials are needed that specifically study fracture prevention strategies in patients with CKD stages 3-5D.

One-Year Romosozumab Treatment Followed by One-Year Denosumab Treatment for Osteoporosis in Patients on Hemodialysis: An Observational Study

There is limited evidence on the use of romosozumab (ROMO) in the treatment of osteoporosis in patients on hemodialysis (HD); thus, we aimed to investigate this topic. This prospective, observational, single-center cohort study included 13 prior osteoporosis treatment-naïve patients on HD with osteoporosis. They first received ROMO once monthly for 12 months (210 mg; subcutaneously once every month). Thereafter, they received denosumab (DENO) for an additional 12 months (60 mg; subcutaneously once every 6 months). We examined the incidence of new fractures; treatment safety; and temporal changes in the bone mineral density (BMD), bone metabolism markers, and vascular calcification. No new cases of fractures were noted. The median one-year percentage changes (from the baseline) in the BMDs at the lumbar spine (LS), total hip (TH), and femoral neck (FN) were + 9.0%, + 2.5%, and + 4.7%, respectively. These changes were maintained for 24 months. The corresponding relative changes from the baseline to 24 months thereafter were + 14.9%, + 5.4%, and + 6.5%, respectively. The percentage changes in TH BMD and FN BMD were negatively correlated with baseline BMD. Coronary artery and thoracic aorta calcification scores increased slightly from baseline to 12 months thereafter. However, fatal events (cardiovascular disease-associated and all-cause deaths) did not occur during ROMO treatment. Effectiveness of ROMO was better in patients who had severe osteoporosis with low TH BMD, low FN BMD, and high tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b level at ROMO initiation.