Three toes and three modes: Dynamics of terrestrial, suspensory, and vertical locomotion in brown-throated three-toed sloths (Bradypodidae, Xenarthra)

Three-Dimensional Limb Kinematics in Brown-Throated Three-Toed Sloths (Bradypus variegatus) During Suspensory Quadrupedal Locomotion

Suspensory locomotion differs significantly from upright quadrupedal locomotion in mammals. Nevertheless, we know little concerning joint kinematics of suspensory movement. Here, we report three-dimensional kinematic data during locomotion in brown-throated three-toed sloths (Bradypus variegatus). Individuals were recorded with four calibrated high-speed cameras while performing below-branch locomotion on a simulated branch. The elbow (range 73°-177°; mean 114°) and knee (range 107°-175°; mean 140°) were extended throughout support phase, with elbow extension increasing with speed. Both the fore- and hindlimb displayed abducted proximal limb elements (i.e., arm and thigh) and adducted distal elements (i.e., forearm and leg) during all support phase points. Comparisons of elbow and knee angles between brown-throated three-toed sloths and Linnaeus's two-toed sloths (Choloepus didactylus) showed that brown-throated three-toed sloths had significantly more extended joint positions during all support phase points. Additionally, across all kinematic measurements, brown-throated three-toed sloths showed significant differences between homologous fore- and hindlimb segments, with the knee being more extended than the elbow and the arm being more abducted than the thigh. These results are consistent with previously established morphological and behavioral differences between extant sloth genera, with three-toed sloths showing significantly longer forelimbs than hindlimbs and typically favoring locomotion on angled supports. Our findings show that, despite overall similarities in the use of below-branch quadrupedal locomotion, the two sloth lineages achieve this locomotor mode with differing kinematic strategies (e.g., degree of joint flexion). These differences may be attributed to the distinct evolutionary pathways through which obligate suspensory locomotion arose in each lineage.

Comparative kinetics of humans and non-human primates during vertical climbing

Climbing represents a critical behavior in the context of primate evolution. However, anatomically modern human populations are considered ill-suited for climbing. This adaptation can be attributed to the evolution of striding bipedalism, redirecting anatomical traits away from efficient climbing. Although prior studies have speculated on the kinetic consequences of this anatomical reorganization, there is a lack of data on the force profiles of human climbers. This study utilized high-speed videography and force plate analysis to assess single limb forces during climbing from 44 human participants of varying climbing experience and compared these data with climbing data from eight species of non-human primates (anthropoids and strepsirrhines). Contrary to expectations, experience level had no significant effect on the magnitude of single limb forces in humans. Experienced climbers did, however, demonstrate a predictable relationship between center of mass position and peak normal forces, suggesting a better ability to modulate forces during climbing. Humans exhibited significantly higher peak propulsive forces in the hindlimb compared with the forelimb and greater hindlimb dominance overall compared with non-human primates. All species sampled demonstrated exclusively tensile forelimbs and predominantly compressive hindlimbs. Strepsirrhines exhibited a pull-push transition in normal forces, while anthropoid primates, including humans, did not. Climbing force profiles are remarkably stereotyped across humans, reflecting the universal mechanical demands of this form of locomotion. Extreme functional differentiation between forelimbs and hindlimbs in humans may help to explain the evolution of bipedalism in ancestrally climbing hominoids.

Muscle architectural properties indicate a primary role in support for the pelvic limb of three-toed sloths (Bradypus variegatus)

Tree sloths evolved below-branch locomotion making them one of few mammalian taxa beyond primates for which suspension is nearly obligatory. Suspension requires strong limb flexor muscles that provide both propulsion and braking/support, and available locomotor kinetics data indicate that these roles differ between fore- and hindlimb pairs. Muscle structure in the pelvic limb is hypothesized to be a key anatomical correlate of function in braking/support during suspensory walking and propulsion and/or support during vertical climbing. This expectation was tested by quantifying architecture properties in the hindlimb limb musculature of brown-throated three-toed sloths (Bradypus variegatus: N = 7) to distinguish the roles of the flexor/extensor functional muscle groups at each joint. Measurements of muscle moment arm (rm ), mass, belly length, fascicle length, pennation angle, and physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA) were taken from n = 45 muscles. Overall, most muscles studied show properties for contractile excursion and fast joint rotational velocity. However, the flexor musculature is more massive (p = 0.048) and has larger PCSA (p = 0.003) than the extensors, especially at the knee joint and digits where well-developed and strong flexors are capable of applying large joint torque. Moreover, selected hip flexors/extensors and knee flexors have modified long rm that can amplify applied joint torque in muscles with otherwise long, parallel fascicles, and one muscle (m. iliopsoas) was capable of moderately high power in B. variegatus. The architectural properties observed in the hip flexors and extensors match well with roles in suspensory braking and vertical propulsion, respectively, whereas strong knee flexors and digital flexors appear to be the main muscles providing suspensory support in the pelvic limb. With aid in support by the forelimbs and the use of adaptive slow locomotion and slow muscle fiber recruitment patterns, structure-function in the tensile limb systems of sloths appears to collectively represent an additional mechanism for energy conservation.