Gene-based therapies of neuromuscular disorders: an update and the pivotal role of patient organizations in their discovery and implementation

Gene transfer to skeletal muscle using hydrodynamic limb vein injection: current applications, hurdles and possible optimizations

Hydrodynamic limb vein injection is an in vivo locoregional gene delivery method. It consists of administrating a large volume of solution containing nucleic acid constructs in a limb with both blood inflow and outflow temporarily blocked using a tourniquet. The fast, high pressure delivery allows the musculature of the whole limb to be reached. The skeletal muscle is a tissue of choice for a variety of gene transfer applications, including gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy or other myopathies, as well as for the production of antibodies or other proteins with broad therapeutic effects. Hydrodynamic limb vein delivery has been evaluated with success in a large range of animal models. It has also proven to be safe and well-tolerated in muscular dystrophy patients, thus supporting its translation to the clinic. However, some possible limitations may occur at different steps of the delivery process. Here, we have highlighted the interests, bottlenecks and potential improvements that could further optimize non-viral gene transfer following hydrodynamic limb vein injection.

Non-viral Vector for Muscle-Mediated Gene Therapy

Non-viral gene delivery to skeletal muscle was one of the first applications of gene therapy that went into the clinic, mainly because skeletal muscle is an easily accessible tissue for local gene transfer and non-viral vectors have a relatively safe and low immunogenic track record. However, plasmid DNA, naked or complexed to the various chemistries, turn out to be moderately efficient in humans when injected locally and very inefficient (and very toxic in some cases) when injected systemically. A number of clinical applications have been initiated however, based on transgenes that were adapted to good local impact and/or to a wide physiological outcome (i.e., strong humoral and cellular immune responses following the introduction of DNA vaccines). Neuromuscular diseases seem more challenging for non-viral vectors. Nevertheless, the local production of therapeutic proteins that may act distantly from the injected site and/or the hydrodynamic perfusion of safe plasmids remains a viable basis for the non-viral gene therapy of muscle disorders, cachexia, as well as peripheral neuropathies.

Biotherapies of neuromuscular disorders

This review focuses on the most recent data on biotherapeutic approaches, using DNA, RNA, recombinant proteins, or cells as therapeutic tools or targets for the treatment of neuromuscular diseases. Many of these novel technologies have now reached the clinical stage and have or are about to move to the market. Others, like genome editing are still in an early stage but hold great promise.

Spinal muscular atrophy: therapeutic strategies

OPINION STATEMENT

Spinal muscular atrophy is caused by mutations in the survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene, leading to the reduction of SMN protein. The loss of alpha motor neurons in the ventral horn of the spinal cord results in progressive paralysis and premature death. There is no current treatment other than symptomatic and supportive care, although over the past decade, there has been an outstanding advancement in understanding the genetics and molecular mechanisms underlying the physiopathology of SMA. The most promising approach, from current trials, is the use of antisense oligonucleotide (ASOs) to redirect SMN2 translation and increase exon 7 inclusion in the majority of the RNA transcript, to increase the production of fully functional SMN protein. Recently, ISIS Pharmaceuticals Inc. (2855 Gazelle Court, Carlsbad CA 92010) reported an interim analysis from a multiple dose study in children with SMA between 2 and 14 years of age, using ASO therapy. The results indicated good tolerability at all dose levels, increases in muscle function in children treated with multiple doses of ISIS-SMNRx, and increase in SMN protein levels in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from both single and multiple dose studies. Studies in infants are ongoing in a few centers; soon other institutions may begin enrollment. Infants are fragile and their disease process may differ from the older SMA population. It is not known whether effective drug would best be given to SMA infants or older children. Other promising therapies are still in preclinical phases or early clinical phases. Gene therapy appears to be efficient in improving survival in a severe mouse model of SMA, though a better definition of the route of administration and of the safety profile of the viral vectors is needed before clinical administration is possible.

Redefining Strategies to Introduce Tolerance-Inducing Cellular Therapy in Human beings to Combat Autoimmunity and Transplantation Reactions

Clinical translation of tolerance-inducing cell therapies requires a novel approach focused on innovative networks, patient involvement, and, foremost, a fundamental paradigm shift in thinking from both Academia, and Industry and Regulatory Agencies. Tolerance-inducing cell products differ essentially from conventional drugs. They are personalized and target interactive immunological networks to shift the balance toward tolerance. The human cell products are often absent or fundamentally different in animals. This creates important limitations of pre-clinical animal testing for safety and efficacy of these products and calls for novel translational approaches, which require the combined efforts of the different parties involved. Dedicated international and multidisciplinary consortia that focus on clinical translation are of utmost importance. They can help in informing and educating regulatory policy makers on the unique requirements for these cell products, ranging from pre-clinical studies in animals to in vitro human studies. In addition, they can promote reliable immunomonitoring tools. The development of tolerance-inducing cell products requires not only bench-to-bedside but also reverse translation, from bedside back to the bench.