Updates in perioperative medicine

High-Risk Perioperative Medications in the Chinese Elderly Population

Background

Inappropriate perioperative medications among elderly patients increase the risk of adverse events and undermine surgical outcomes. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of high-risk medications in elderly surgical patients and verify the effectiveness of a new-developed high-risk perioperative medications (HRPOMs) list for the elderly.

Methods

A cross-sectional, single-center study was conducted at Jinshan Hospital of Fudan University. A total of 810 elderly surgical patients were included in the study. The HRPOMs list was applied to patients’ data to identify the HRPOMs including chronic medications and medications related to surgery.

Results

A total of 2113 HRPOMs were identified in 810 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of these, 1067 (50.5%) involved medications related to surgery, and 982 (46.5%) involved chronic medications. The prevalence of HRPOM exposure, which was defined as at least one HRPOM was 76.3%. Patients that were 70 years or older (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] =2.118, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.420~3.159), hospitalized over two weeks (AOR =4.192, 95% CI, 1.493~11.771), with more than 2 distinct diagnoses (AOR =3.407, 95% CI, 2.224~5.220) and with 16 or more medications during hospitalization were more likely to be exposed to HRPOMs. Patients who underwent surgeries of Grade IV were at 1.73 increased odds of HRPOM exposure compared with those who received surgeries of Grade III or lower (P=0.071).

Conclusion

HRPOMs are more common in patients of 70 years or older, with 3 or more distinct diagnoses, with 16 or more medications and hospitalized for 15 days or longer. Our study showed the validity of the HRPOMs list in the perioperative medication review for the elderly and may induce further research to reveal the impact of HRPOMs upon the surgical outcomes of the elderly.

Ultrasound-guided axillary vein puncture for cardiac devices implantation in patients under antithrombotic therapy

Background

Ultrasound-guided axillary venous puncture (UGAVP) for cardiac devices implantation has been developed because of its rapidity, safety and potential long-term lead protection. Early work excluded defibrillators (ICD), cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and upgrade procedures. Compared to the cephalic approach, in previous studies, there was a greater use of pressure dressings with this technique, suggesting a higher risk of bleeding.

Aims

To assess UGAVP in patients under antithrombotic therapy (ATT) undergoing cardiac devices implantation including CRT/ICD.

Methods

Prospectively, consecutive patients eligible for a pacemaker or ICD implantation were included. All procedures were performed by a single operator, experienced with UGAVP for femoral access, and fluoroscopy-guided axillary vein access. Guidewires insertion time (from lidocaïne administration), and complications were systematically studied.

Results

From 457 cardiac device implantations, 200 patients (77.8 ± 10 y, male 58%) 360 leads were implanted by UGAVP including 36 ICD, 54 CRT and 14 upgrade procedures. A majority (90%) was under ATT: Vitamin K Antagonist or Heparin (n = 58, 29%), direct oral anticoagulant (n = 46, 23%), dual antithrombotic therapy (n = 18, 9%) and single antiplatelet drug (n = 82, 41%). UGAVP was successful in 95.78%. Mean insertion time for 1.8 guidewires per patient was 4.68 ± 3.6 min. No complication (no hematoma) was observed during the follow-up (mean of 45 ± 10 months). Guidewires insertion time reached its plateau after 15 patients.

Conclusion

UGAVP is fast, feasible and safe for patients under ATT undergoing device implantation including CRT/ICD and upgrade procedures, with a short learning curve.