Determination of sulfur components in natural gas: A review

Integrated algal and oil palm biorefinery as a model system for bioenergy co-generation with bioproducts and biopharmaceuticals

BACKGROUND

There has been a greater call for greener and eco-friendly processes and bioproducts to meet the 2030's core agenda on 17 global sustainable development goals. The challenge lies in incorporating systems thinking with a comprehensive worldview as a guiding principle to develop the economy, whilst taking cognisance of the need to safeguard the environment, and to embrace the socio-cultural diversity dimension as an equal component. Any discussion on climate change, destruction of eco-system and habitat for wildlife, poverty and starvation, and the spread of infectious diseases, must be addressed together with the emphasis on the development of cleaner energy, air and water, better management of resources and biodiversity, improved agro-practices for food production and distribution, and affordable health care, as the outcomes and key performance indicators to be evaluated. Strict regulation, monitoring and enforcement to minimize emission, pollution and wastage must also be put in place.

CONCLUSION

This review article focuses on the research and development efforts to achieve sustainable bioenergy production, environmental remediation, and transformation of agro-materials into value-added bioproducts through the integrated algal and oil palm biorefinery. Recent development in microalgal research with nanotechnology as anti-cancer and antimicrobial agents and for biopharmaceutical applications are discussed. The life-cycle analysis in the context of palm oil mill processes is evaluated. The way forward from this integrated biorefinery concept is to strive for inclusive development strategies, and to address the immediate and pressing problems facing the Planet and the People, whilst still reaping the Profit.

Investigation of the storage stability of selected volatile sulfur compounds in different sampling containers

The suitability of various sample containers (i.e. standard Tedlar sample bags, black/clear layered Tedlar sample bags and Silcosteel sample cylinders) was examined for a gaseous multicomponent standard containing methylmercaptan, ethylmercaptan, dimethyl sulfide, ethylmethyl sulfide, 2-propylmercaptan, 1-propylmercaptan, 2-butylmercaptan, diethyl sulfide and 1-butylmercaptan (1 mg/m3 each in nitrogen). In the black/clear layered Tedlar sample bags, significant losses (up to 10% for methylmercaptan as the most critical component) were observed after 2 days, whereas in the standard Tedlar sample bags the recovery of methylmercaptan was approximately 90% even after 1 week. The Silcosteel sample cylinders were suitable for sampling of volatile sulfur compounds with respect to the stability of the analytes, but the recoveries exceeded 100% especially for the higher boiling compounds, which was attributed to enrichment effects on parts of the sampling system.