Modified breath-hold compressed-sensing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography with a small field-of-view and high resolution acquisition: Clinical feasibility in biliary and pancreatic disorders

Advanced MRI techniques in abdominal imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a crucial modality for abdominal imaging evaluation of focal lesions and tissue properties. However, several obstacles, such as prolonged scan times, limitations in patients' breath-hold capacity, and contrast agent-associated artifacts, remain in abdominal MR images. Recent techniques, including parallel imaging, three-dimensional acquisition, compressed sensing, and deep learning, have been developed to reduce the scan time while ensuring acceptable image quality or to achieve higher resolution without extending the scan duration. Quantitative measurements using MRI techniques enable the noninvasive evaluation of specific materials. A comprehensive understanding of these advanced techniques is essential for accurate interpretation of MRI sequences. Herein, we therefore review advanced abdominal MRI techniques.

Advanced Abdominal MRI Techniques and Problem-Solving Strategies

MRI plays an important role in abdominal imaging because of its ability to detect and characterize focal lesions. However, MRI examinations have several challenges, such as comparatively long scan times and motion management through breath-holding maneuvers. Techniques for reducing scan time with acceptable image quality, such as parallel imaging, compressed sensing, and cutting-edge deep learning techniques, have been developed to enable problem-solving strategies. Additionally, free-breathing techniques for dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, such as extra-dimensional-volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination, golden-angle radial sparse parallel, and liver acceleration volume acquisition Star, can help patients with severe dyspnea or those under sedation to undergo abdominal MRI. We aimed to present various advanced abdominal MRI techniques for reducing the scan time while maintaining image quality and free-breathing techniques for dynamic imaging and illustrate cases using the techniques mentioned above. A review of these advanced techniques can assist in the appropriate interpretation of sequences.

Rapid 3D breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography using deep learning-constrained compressed sensing reconstruction

OBJECTIVES

To compare the image quality of three-dimensional breath-hold magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with deep learning-based compressed sensing reconstruction (3D DL-CS-MRCP) to those of 3D breath-hold MRCP with compressed sensing (3D CS-MRCP), 3D breath-hold MRCP with gradient and spin-echo (3D GRASE-MRCP) and conventional 2D single-shot breath-hold MRCP (2D MRCP).

METHODS

In total, 102 consecutive patients who underwent MRCP at 3.0 T, including 2D MRCP, 3D GRASE-MRCP, 3D CS-MRCP, and 3D DL-CS-MRCP, were prospectively included. Two radiologists independently analyzed the overall image quality, background suppression, artifacts, and visualization of pancreaticobiliary ducts using a five-point scale. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the common bile duct (CBD), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the CBD and liver, and contrast ratio between the periductal tissue and CBD were measured. The Friedman test was performed to compare the four protocols.

RESULTS

3D DL-CS-MRCP resulted in improved SNR and CNR values compared with those in the other three protocols, and better contrast ratio compared with that in 3D CS-MRCP and 3D GRASE-MRCP (all, p < 0.05). Qualitative image analysis showed that 3D DL-CS-MRCP had better performance for second-level intrahepatic ducts and distal main pancreatic ducts compared with 3D CS-MRCP (all, p < 0.05). Compared with 2D MRCP, 3D DL-CS-MRCP demonstrated better performance for the second-order left intrahepatic duct but was inferior in assessing the main pancreatic duct (all, p < 0.05). Moreover, the image quality was significantly higher in 3D DL-CS-MRCP than in 3D GRASE-MRCP.

CONCLUSION

3D DL-CS-MRCP has superior performance compared with that of 3D CS-MRCP or 3D GRASE-MRCP. Deep learning reconstruction also provides a comparable image quality but with inferior main pancreatic duct compared with that revealed by 2D MRCP.

KEY POINTS

• 3D breath-hold MRCP with deep learning reconstruction (3D DL-CS-MRCP) demonstrated improved image quality compared with that of 3D MRCP with compressed sensing or GRASE. • Compared with 2D MRCP, 3D DL-CS-MRCP had superior performance in SNR and CNR, better visualization of the left second-level intrahepatic bile ducts, and comparable overall image quality, but an inferior main pancreatic duct.

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: pitfalls in interpretation

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) has become a widely accepted noninvasive diagnostic tool in the assessment of pancreatic and biliary disease. MRCP essentially exploits extended T2 relaxation times of slow-moving fluid and delineates the outline of biliary and pancreatic ducts on T2-weighted images. In order to maximize the clinical implication of MRCP, it is of utmost importance for radiologists to optimize the acquisition technique, be aware of patient-related factors and physiologic changes than can affect its performance and interpretation. It is critical to understand the most common artifacts and pitfalls encountered during acquisition and interpretation of MRCP. We provide a general overview of the different pitfalls encountered in MRCP and pearls on how to manage them in real-world practice.

Feasibility of 3D Breath-Hold MR Cholangiopancreatography with a Spatially Selective Radiofrequency Excitation Pulse: Prospective Comparison with Parallel Imaging Technique and Compressed Sensing Method

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the clinical feasibility of the modified 3D breath-hold magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with parallel imaging (3D-BH-PI-MRCP) using a spatially selective radiofrequency excitation pulse in patients with suspected pancreaticobiliary diseases. Moreover, we also compared its image quality with those of the original 3D-BH-PI-MRCP with a nonselective exciting pulse and the 3D breath hold compressed sensing magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (3D-BH-CS-MRCP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2021 and July 2021, 106 patients prospectively underwent modified 3D-BH-PI-MRCP, original 3D-BH-PI-MRCP and 3D-BH-CS-MRCP at 3T in this study. The Friedman test was performed to compare the contrast, signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR), and contrast-noise-ratio, overall image quality, and duct visualization among the three protocols.

RESULTS

The contrast ratio, SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio of the common bile duct differed significantly among the three sequences (p < 0.001). Compared to the 3D-BH-CS-MRCP protocol, the overall imaging quality of the two 3D-BH-PI-MRCP was higher but not significantly different. The scores for the anterior and posterior branches visualization were significantly higher in the original 3D-BH-PI-MRCP compared to the 3D-BH-CS-MRCP, but were no significant differences between the modified 3D-BH-PI-MRCP and the 3D-BH-CS-MRCP.

CONCLUSION

The modified 3D-BH-PI-MRCP with a spatially selective radiofrequency excitation pulse could provide comparable image quality to the original 3D-BH-PI-MRCP and the 3D-BH-CS-MRCP during a single breath hold (22 seconds), and showed improved SNR and superior visualization of the pancreaticobiliary tree.

Improved Single Breath-Hold SSFSE Sequence for Liver MRI Based on Compressed Sensing: Evaluation of Image Quality Compared with Conventional T2-Weighted Sequences

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the image quality of compressed-sensing accelerated single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSECS) sequences acquired within a single breath-hold in comparison with conventional SSFSE (SSFSECONV) and multishot TSE (mTSE). A total of 101 patients who underwent liver MRI at 3 T, including SSFSECONV (acquisition time (TA) = 58−62 s), mTSE (TA = 108 s), and SSFSECS (TA = 18 s), were included in this retrospective study. Two radiologists assessed the three sequences with respect to artifacts, organ sharpness, small structure visibility, overall image quality, and conspicuity of main lesions of liver and pancreas using a five-point evaluation scale system. Descriptive statistics and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used for statistical analysis. SSFSECS was significantly better than SSFSECONV and mTSE for artifacts, small structure visibility, overall image quality, and conspicuity of main lesions (p < 0.005). Regarding organ sharpness, mTSE and SSFSECS did not significantly differ (p = 0.554). Conspicuity of liver lesion did not significantly differ between SSFSECONV and mTSE (p = 0.404). SSFSECS showed superior image quality compared with SSFSECONV and mTSE despite a more than three-fold reduction in TA, suggesting a remarkable potential for saving time in liver imaging.

Comparison of quantitative 3D magnetic resonance cholangiography measurements obtained using three different image acquisition methods

PURPOSE

To compare quantitative biliary measurements obtained with three different magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) acquisition methods.

METHODS

This retrospective study was IRB-approved. Patients with combinations of clinically indicated 3D FSE MRCP with sensitivity encoding (SENSE), 3D FSE SENSE MRCP with compressed sensing (CS-FSE; acceleration factor 8), and 3D gradient and spin-echo (GRASE) MRCP, acquired between October 2018 and March 2020, were included. The MRCP + Tuning Threshold algorithm (Perspectum Ltd., Oxford, UK) was used to segment 3D biliary models from MRCP data, with multiple metrics quantified from the models. Single measure, two-way, mixed-effects intra-class correlations, Bland-Altman analyses, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare quantitative measurements.

RESULTS

From 160 MRCP datasets (25 3D FSE, 67 3D CS-FSE, 68 3D GRASE) in 69 patients, 48 datasets (7 [28%] 3D FSE, 14 [21%] 3D CS-FSE, 27 [40%] 3D GRASE) failed post-processing due to motion artifacts. The remaining 112 MRCP datasets (18 3D FSE, 53 3D CS-FSE, 41 3D GRASE) from 60 patients were included in the analysis. There was good to excellent agreement between 3D FSE and 3D CS-FSE MRCP for diameter of the left and right hepatic ducts, biliary volume, number and length of ducts, and total length of dilations (ICC: 0.83-0.93). The only metrics that exhibited good agreement between 3D FSE and 3D GRASE MRCP were biliary volume (ICC: 0.75) and total number of dilations (ICC: 0.77).

CONCLUSION

3D CS-FSE MRCP produces comparable biliary diameter metrics and global duct quantification to 3D FSE MRCP at a significantly reduced acquisition time.

Development of three-dimensional MR neurography using an optimized combination of compressed sensing and parallel imaging

PURPOSE

To assess the cervical magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) imaging quality obtained with compressed sensing and sensitivity-encoding (compressed SENSE; CS-SENSE) technique in comparison to that obtained with the conventional parallel imaging (i.e., SENSE) technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five healthy volunteers underwent a three-dimensional (3D) turbo spin-echo (TSE)-based cervical MRN examination using a 3.0 Tesla MR-unit. All MRN acquisitions were performed with CS-SENSE and conventional SENSE. We used four acceleration factors (4, 8, 16 and 32) in CS-SENSE. The image quality in MRN was evaluated by assessing the degree of cervical nerve depiction using the contrast ratio (CR) and contrast-noise ratio (CNR) between the cervical nerve and the background signal intensity and a visual scoring system (1: poor, 2: moderate, 3: good). In all of the CR, CNR and visual score, we calculated the ratio of the CS-SENSE-based MRN to that from SENSE-based MRN plus the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of these ratios.

RESULTS

In the multiple comparison of MRN images with the control of conventional SENSE-based MRN, both the quantitative CR values and the visual score for the CS-SENSE factors of 16 and 32 were significantly lower, whereas the CS-SENSE factors of 4 and 8 showed a non-significant difference. In addition, the quantitative CNR values obtained with the CS-SENSE factors of 4 and 8 were significantly higher than that obtained with the conventional SENSE-based MRN while the CS-SENSE factor of 32 was significantly lower, in contrast, the CS-SENSE factors of 16 showed a non-significant difference. For CS-SENSE factors of 4 and 8, all ratios of the CS-SENSE-based MRN values for CR, CNR and visual scores to those from SENSE-based MRN were above 0.95.

CONCLUSION

CS-SENSE-based MRN can accomplish fast scanning with sufficient image quality when using a high acceleration factor.

Application of Compressed Sensing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography (CS-MRCP) with Contact-Free Physiological Monitoring (CFPM) for Pancreaticobiliary Disorders

RATIONAL AND OBJECTIVES

To prospectively evaluate the clinical feasibility of the magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) protocol using both contact-free physiological monitoring (CFPM) and compressed sensing (CS) (CS-CFPM-MRCP) and to compare its performance with that of the standard navigator-triggered (NT) CS-NT-MRCP and NT-MRCP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 63 patients (36 males, 27 females, age range: 18-83 years, mean age: 52.30 ± 15.70 years) suspected with duct-related pathologies were prospectively enrolled and performed the three MRCP protocols randomly. The acquisition time was compared. The pancreaticobiliary system was divided into 12 segments and evaluated based on a five-point Likert scale and compared by the Friedman test with a post hoc test. The diagnostic performance of the 3 MRCP was evaluated by the AUC value and compared by Delong's test. The interobserver agreement was evaluated by Kendall's W test.

RESULTS

Compared to NT-MRCP, the acquisition time of CS-NT-MRCP and CS-CFPM-MRCP was significantly decreased (both p < 0.001). There is no significant difference in the overall imaging quality (p > 0.05) between the NT-MRCP and CS-CFPM-MRCP protocols. CS-CFPM-MRCP depicted pancreatic duct and intrahepatic ducts better than CS-NT-MRCP (all p < 0.05) and was comparable with that of the NT-MRCP (all p > 0.05). For identification of abnormalities and diseases associated with MPD anatomy, the mean AUC value for NT-MRCP and CS-CFPM-MRCP were 0.896 (95%CI: 0.834, 0.958) and 0.905 (95%CI: 0.846, 0.964), which were significantly higher when compared to that for CS-NT-MRCP (0.713 [95%CI:0.622, 0.805]) (p = 0.001 and < 0.001). All evaluations showed good to excellent agreement (0.619-0.897).

CONCLUSION

The combination of CS and CFPM is considered feasible for shortening the scan time of 3D free breath MRCP without impairing the imaging quality and CS-CFPM-MRCP is considered feasible for patients suspected with pancreaticobiliary diseases.

Single-Breath-Hold MRI-SPACE Cholangiopancreatography with Compressed Sensing versus Conventional Respiratory-Triggered MRI-SPACE Cholangiopancreatography at 3Tesla: Comparison of Image Quality and Diagnostic Confidence

To compare two magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) sequences at 3 Tesla (3T): the conventional 3D Respiratory-Triggered SPACE sequence (RT-MRCP) and a prototype 3D Compressed-Sensing Breath-Hold SPACE sequence (CS-BH-MRCP), in terms of qualitative and quantitative image quality and radiologist's diagnostic confidence for detecting common bile duct (CBD) lithiasis, biliary anastomosis stenosis in liver-transplant recipients, and communication of pancreatic cyst with the main pancreatic duct (MPD). Sixty-eight patients with suspicion of choledocholithiasis or biliary anastomosis stenosis after liver transplant, or branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas (BD-IPMN), were included. The relative CBD to peri-biliary tissues (PBT) contrast ratio (CR) was assessed. Overall image quality, presence of artefacts, background noise suppression and the visualization of 12 separated segments of the pancreatic and bile ducts were evaluated by two observers working independently on a five-point scale. Diagnostic confidence was scored on a 1-3 scale. The CS-BH-MRCP presented significantly better CRs (p < 0.0001), image quality (p = 0.004), background noise suppression (p = 0.011), fewer artefacts (p = 0.004) and better visualization of pancreatic and bile ducts segments with the exception of the proximal CBD (p = 0.054), cystic duct confluence (p = 0.459), the four secondary intrahepatic bile ducts, and central part of the MPD (p = 0.885) for which no significant differences were found. Overall, diagnostic confidence was significantly better with the CS-BH-MRCP sequence for both readers (p = 0.038 and p = 0.038, respectively). This study shows that the CS-BH-MRCP sequence presents overall better image quality and bile and pancreatic ducts visualization compared to the conventional RT-MRCP sequence at 3T.

Comparison of respiratory-triggered 3D MR cholangiopancreatography and breath-hold compressed-sensing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T and 3 T and impact of individual factors on image quality

PURPOSE

To evaluate the image quality of an accelerated compressed-sensing single-breath-hold 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (BH-CS-MRCP) prototype sequence compared to the standard 3D sequence with respiratory triggering (STD-MRCP) at 1.5 T and 3 T. To assess the individual factors that can affect image quality.

METHOD

This is a retrospective analysis. Both sequences (BH-CS-MRCP and STD-MRCP) were performed in 200 patients at 1.5 T and 200 patients at 3 T. Overall image quality and the visualization of the bilio-pancreatic ducts were rated on a 5-point scale. Image sharpness and background suppression were rated on a 4-point scale. A double reading was performed in 50 patients to assess the inter-observer reproducibility. Individual characteristics studied were gender, age, BMI, ascites, abdominal surface and breath-hold quality.

RESULTS

At 1.5 T, BH-CS-MRCP was inferior to STD-MRCP in terms of overall quality (p = 0.0046), background suppression (p < 0.0001), visualization of the cystic duct (p < 0.0001), the right bile duct (p = 0.0008), the left bile duct (p = 0.0152), and the main pancreatic duct (p < 0.0001). However, BH-CS-MRCP was sharper than STD-MRCP (p = 0.028). At 3 T, BH-CS-MRCP was superior to STD-MRCP for overall quality (p < 0.0001), sharpness (p < 0.0001), and visualization of the bilio-pancreatic ducts (p < 0.0001). Background signal was conversely better suppressed in STD-MRCP (p < 0.0001). At 1.5 T, the volume of ascites was inversely correlated with image quality for BH-CS-MRCP while BMI was inversely correlated with image quality for STD-MRCP. Breath-hold quality was correlated with image quality for BH-CS-MRCP at 1.5 T and 3 T.

CONCLUSION

BH-CS-MRCP is feasible in clinical routine at 1.5 and 3 T, yielding significantly better perceived image quality at 3 T but not at 1.5 T. BH-CS-MRCP appears to be influenced by ascites whereas STD-MRCP is influenced by BMI at 1.5 T. This study was approved by the Ethics Review Board for Research in Medical Imaging (IRB: CRM-2003-065).

Comparisons between image quality and diagnostic performance of 2D- and breath-hold 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3T

OBJECTIVES

To compare the image quality and diagnostic performance of 2D MRCP to those of breath-hold 3D MRCP using compressed sensing (CS-MRCP) and gradient and spin-echo (GRASE-MRCP) at 3T.

METHODS

From January to November 2018, patients who underwent pancreatobiliary MRI including 2D MRCP and two breath-hold 3D MRCP using CS and GRASE at 3T were included. Three radiologists independently evaluated image quality, motion artifact, and pancreatic cyst conspicuity. Diagnostic performance was assessed for bile duct anatomic variation, bile duct, and pancreatic diseases using a composite algorithm as reference standards. Pancreatic lesion detectability and conspicuity were evaluated using JAFROC and generalized estimating equation analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred patients (male = 50) were included. Bile duct anatomic variation, bile duct and pancreatic diseases were present in respectively 31, 15, and 79 patients. Breath-hold 3D MRCP provided better image quality than 2D MRCP (3.5 ± 0.6 in 2D MRCP; 4.0 ± 0.7 in GRASE-MRCP and 3.9 ± 0.8 in CS-MRCP, p < 0.001 for both). There was no difference in motion artifact between 2D and breath-hold 3D MRCP (p = 0.1). Breath-hold 3D CS-MRCP provided better pancreatic cyst conspicuity than 2D MRCP (2.7 [95% CI: 2.5-3.0] vs. 2.3 [95% CI: 2.1-2.5], p = 0.001). There were no significant differences between the diagnostic performance of the three sequences in the detection of bile duct anatomic variation or pancreatic lesions (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Breath-hold 3D MRCP with GRASE or CS can provide better image quality than 2D MRCP in a comparable scan time.

KEY POINTS

• Breath-hold 3D MRCP using compressed sensing (CS) or gradient and spin-echo (GRASE) provided a better image quality with less image blurring than 2D MRCP. • There were no significant differences between 2D MRCP and breath-hold 3D MRCP in either motion artifact or the number of non-diagnostic exams. • There were no significant differences between 2D MRCP and either type of breath-hold 3D MRCP in the diagnosis of bile duct anatomic variation or detection of pancreatic lesions.

Comparison of Compressed Sensing and Gradient and Spin-Echo in Breath-Hold 3D MR Cholangiopancreatography: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis

While magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is routinely used, compressed sensing MRCP (CS-MRCP) and gradient and spin-echo MRCP (GRASE-MRCP) with breath-holding (BH) may allow sufficient image quality with shorter acquisition times. This study qualitatively and quantitatively compared BH-CS-MRCP and BH-GRASE-MRCP and evaluated their clinical effectiveness. Data from 59 consecutive patients who underwent both BH-CS-MRCP and BH-GRASE-MRCP were qualitatively analyzed using a five-point Likert-type scale. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the common bile duct (CBD), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the CBD and liver, and contrast ratio between periductal tissue and the CBD were measured. Paired t-test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and McNemar’s test were used for statistical analysis. No significant differences were found in overall image quality or duct visualization of the CBD, right and left 1st level intrahepatic duct (IHD), cystic duct, and proximal pancreatic duct (PD). BH-CS-MRCP demonstrated higher background suppression and better visualization of right (p = 0.004) and left 2nd level IHD (p < 0.001), mid PD (p = 0.003), and distal PD (p = 0.041). Image quality degradation was less with BH-GRASE-MRCP than BH-CS-MRCP (p = 0.025). Of 24 patients with communication between a cyst and the PD, 21 (87.5%) and 15 patients (62.5%) demonstrated such communication on BH-CS-MRCP and BH-GRASE-MRCP, respectively. SNR, contrast ratio, and CNR of BH-CS-MRCP were higher than BH-GRASE-MRCP (p < 0.001). Both BH-CS-MRCP and BH-GRASE-MRCP are useful imaging methods with sufficient image quality. Each method has advantages, such as better visualization of small ducts with BH-CS-MRCP and greater time saving with BH-GRASE-MRCP. These differences allow diverse choices for visualization of the pancreaticobiliary tree in clinical practice.

Navigator-triggered and breath-hold 3D MRCP using compressed sensing: image quality and method selection factor assessment

PURPOSE

To examine whether MRCP using a combination of compressed sensing and sensitivity encoding with navigator-triggered and breath-hold techniques (NT C-SENSE and BH C-SENSE, respectively) have comparable image quality to that of navigator-triggered MRCP using only sensitivity encoding (NT SENSE) at 1.5-T.

METHODS

Fifty-one participants were enrolled in this prospective study between July and October 2018 and underwent the three 3D MRCP sequences each. The acquisition time and relative duct-to-periductal contrast ratios (RC values) of each bile duct segment were obtained. Visualization of the bile and main pancreatic ducts, background suppression, artifacts, and overall image quality were scored on 5-point scales. Mean and median differences in RC values and qualitative scores of NT C-SENSE and BH C-SENSE relative to NT SENSE were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Acquisition time of NT SENSE, NT C-SENSE, and BH C-SENSE were 348, 143 (mean for both), and 18 s (for all participants), respectively. The RC value of each bile duct segment was inferior, but the lower limits of the 95% CIs of the mean differences were ≥ - 0.10, for both NT C-SENSE and BH C-SENSE. The visualization score of the intrahepatic duct in BH C-SENSE was inferior to that in NT SENSE (lower 95% CI limit, - 1.5). In both NT C-SENSE and BH C-SENSE, the 95% CIs of the median differences in the other qualitative scores were from - 1.0 to 0.0.

CONCLUSION

NT C-SENSE and BH C-SENSE have comparable image quality to NT SENSE at 1.5-T.

Rapid Imaging: Recent Advances in Abdominal MRI for Reducing Acquisition Time and Its Clinical Applications

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in abdominal imaging. The high contrast resolution offered by MRI provides better lesion detection and its capacity to provide multiparametric images facilitates lesion characterization more effectively than computed tomography. However, the relatively long acquisition time of MRI often detrimentally affects the image quality and limits its accessibility. Recent developments have addressed these drawbacks. Specifically, multiphasic acquisition of contrast-enhanced MRI, free-breathing dynamic MRI using compressed sensing technique, simultaneous multi-slice acquisition for diffusion-weighted imaging, and breath-hold three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography are recent notable advances in this field. This review explores the aforementioned state-of-the-art techniques by focusing on their clinical applications and potential benefits, as well as their likely future direction.

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with compressed sensing at 1.5 T: clinical application for the evaluation of branch duct IPMN of the pancreas

Objectives

To evaluate magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with compressed sensing (CS) for the assessment of branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (BD-IPMN) of the pancreas. For this purpose, conventional navigator-triggered (NT) sampling perfection with application-optimized contrast using different flip angle evolutions (SPACE) MRCP was compared with various CS-SPACE-MRCP sequences in a clinical setting.

Methods

A total of 41 patients (14 male, 27 female, mean age 68 years) underwent 1.5-T MRCP for the evaluation of BD-IPMN. The MRCP protocol consisted of the following sequences: conventional NT-SPACE-MRCP, CS-SPACE-MRCP with long (BHL, 17 s) and short single breath-hold (BHS, 8 s), and NT-CS-SPACE-MRCP. Two board-certified radiologists evaluated image quality, duct sharpness, duct visualization, lesion conspicuity, confidence, and communication with the main pancreatic duct in consensus using a 5-point scale (1–5), with higher scores indicating better quality/delineation/confidence. Maximum intensity projection reconstructions and originally acquired data were used for evaluation. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the intra-individual difference between sequences.

Results

BHS-CS-SPACE-MRCP had the highest scores for image quality (3.85 ± 0.79), duct sharpness (3.81 ± 1.05), and duct visualization (3.81 ± 1.01). There was a significant difference compared with NT-CS-SPACE-MRCP (p < 0.05) but no significant difference to the standard NT-SPACE-MRCP (p > 0.05). Concerning diagnostic quality, BHS-CS-SPACE-MRCP had the highest scores in lesion conspicuity (3.95 ± 0.92), confidence (4.12 ± 1.08), and communication (3.8 ± 1.06), significantly higher compared with NT-SPACE-MRCP, BHL-SPACE-MRCP, and NT-CS-SPACE-MRCP (p = <0.05).

Conclusions

MRCP with CS 3D SPACE for the evaluation of BD-IPMN at 1.5 T provides the best results using a short breath-hold sequence. This approach is feasible and an excellent alternative to standard NT 3D MRCP sequences.

Key Points

• 1.5-T MRCP with compressed sensing for the evaluation of branch duct IPMN is a feasible method.

• Short breath-hold sequences provide the best results for this purpose.

Optimized Breath-Hold Compressed-Sensing 3D MR Cholangiopancreatography at 3T: Image Quality Analysis and Clinical Feasibility Assessment

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) has been widely used in clinical practice, and recently developed compressed-sensing accelerated MRCP (CS-MRCP) has shown great potential in shortening the acquisition time. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the clinical feasibility and image quality of optimized breath-hold CS-MRCP (BH-CS-MRCP) and conventional navigator-triggered MRCP. Data from 124 consecutive patients with suspected pancreaticobiliary diseases were analyzed by two radiologists using a five-point Likert-type scale. Communication between a cyst and the pancreatic duct (PD) was analyzed. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the common bile duct (CBD), contrast ratio between the CBD and periductal tissue, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the CBD and liver were measured. Optimized BH-CS-MRCP showed significantly fewer artifacts with better background suppression and overall image quality. Optimized BH-CS-MRCP demonstrated communication between a cyst and the PD better than conventional MRCP (96.7% vs. 76.7%, p = 0.048). SNR, contrast ratio, and CNR were significantly higher with optimized BH-CS-MRCP (p < 0.001). Optimized BH-CS-MRCP showed comparable or even better image quality than conventional MRCP, with improved visualization of communication between a cyst and the PD.

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3T in a single breath-hold: comparative effectiveness between three-dimensional (3D) gradient- and spin-echo and two-dimensional (2D) thick-slab fast spin-echo acquisitions

Background

To compare the depiction conspicuity of three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) based on gradient- and spin-echo (GRASE) and two-dimensional (2D) thick-slab MRCP using fast spin-echo (FSE) in different segments of hepatic and pancreatic ducts at 3T.

Methods

Both 3D GRASE and 2D thick-slab FSE MRCP, with parameters adjusted under the constraints of specific absorption rate and scan time within single breath-hold, were performed for 95 subjects (M/F =49:46; age range, 25-75) at 3T. Conspicuity of eight ductal segments was graded by two experienced raters using a 4-point score. Situations where one technique is superior or inferior to the other were recorded.

Results

3D GRASE MRCP outperformed 2D thick-slab FSE MRCP in the common bile duct and common hepatic ducts (both with P<0.001), but compared inferiorly in the right hepatic ducts (P<0.001), right posterior hepatic ducts (P<0.005) and pancreatic duct distal (P<0.05). Performing both 3D and 2D MRCP would reduce the number of non-diagnostic readings in the left hepatic duct to 10 remaining (5.3%), compared with 31 (16.3%) or 21 (11.1%) out of 190 readings if using 3D GRASE or 2D thick-slab FSE alone, respectively.

Conclusions

Although 3D GRASE MRCP is preferential to visualize the common bile duct and common hepatic duct within one single breath-hold, the complementary role of 2D thick-slab FSE MRCP in smaller hepatic and pancreatic ducts makes it a useful adjunct if performed additionally.

Breath-hold compressed-sensing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography compared to free-breathing 3D MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective study of image quality and diagnostic performance in pancreatic disorders

PURPOSE

To compare image quality and diagnostic performance of three magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) protocols in patients with suspected pancreatic abnormalities: free-breathing standard 3D-MRCP (STD), free-breathing compressed sensing 3D-MRCP (CS), and CS 3D-MRCP with acquisition during a single breath-hold > 20 s (BH-CS).

METHODS

Informed consent was obtained. We performed 57 MRCPs in 56 prospectively included patients (29 men, median age 59 years). The three protocols were performed in random order. Acquisition time was recorded. Two radiologists blinded to the protocols used 5-point scales to assess image quality parameters (overall image quality, amount of artifacts, background suppression, bile and pancreatic duct visualization) and diagnostic performance (anatomical variants, duct abnormalities, cystic lesions).

RESULTS

Acquisition time was 279 s with STD, 176 s with CS (-37%), and 22 s with BH-CS (-93%). STD and BH-CS were not significantly different for overall image quality, artifacts, or background suppression. The BH-CS group had fewer non-diagnostic scans (3% vs. 19% with STD and 21% with CS, p < 0.05), higher-quality scans (78% vs. 66% with STD and 58% with CS, p < 0.05), and milder artifacts (2% vs. 18% with STD and 16% with CS, p < 0.05). The main pancreatic duct was better visualized with BH-CS compared to STD (p = 0.015) and CS (p < 0.001). Diagnostic performance did not differ across the three protocols. There were fewer indeterminate scans in the BH-CS group.

CONCLUSION

3T BH-CS is reliable, saves time, and is not associated with decreases in image quality or diagnostic performance compared to STD and CS.

Usefulness of breath-hold compressed sensing accelerated three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) added to respiratory-gating conventional MRCP

PURPOSE

To clarify the clinical usefulness of breath-hold compressed sensing three-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (BH-MRCP) added to conventional respiratory-gating MRCP (RG-MRCP), we prospectively evaluated the image quality of BH-MRCP and compared it with that of RG-MRCP. We also evaluated to what extent the overall image quality was improved by adding BH-MRCP to RG-MRCP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 113 patients who underwent RG-MRCP and BH-MRCP at a 3-T MR unit were enrolled. We set a scan time of approximately 180 s for RG-MRCP and 20 s for BH-MRCP before examination, and measured actual scan time and assessed image quality using a 5-point scale (5, good; 1, poor). Image quality scores of 1, 2 and 3 were considered clinically inadequate. Image quality scores of RG-MRCP and BH-MRCP were compared. In addition, we compared "RG-MRCP alone" and "hybrid MRCP" (the best-scoring image was picked from RG-MRCP and BH-MRCP when the RG-MRCP score was clinically inadequate).

RESULTS

The mean actual scan time of RG-MRCP/BH-MRCP was 191/20 s. The mean scores of RG-MRCP, BH-MRCP and hybrid MRCP were 3.67, 3.35 and 3.92, respectively. The score of hybrid MRCP was significantly better than that of RG-MRCP (P <  0.05). The image quality of RG-MRCP was clinically inadequate in 43/113 (38 %) cases and the inadequate image quality was improved to be clinically adequate in 13/43 (30 %) cases by adding BH-MRCP.

CONCLUSION

BH-MRCP brings added value to RG-MRCP because an additional examination of BH-MRCP could compensate for the image deterioration of RG-MRCP caused by motion artifacts.

Comparison and evaluation of the efficacy of compressed SENSE (CS) and gradient- and spin-echo (GRASE) in breath-hold (BH) magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP)

CONTRACT GRANT SPONSOR

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) Initiative for Innovative Medicine; Contract grant number: 2017-I2M-1-001; Contract grant sponsor: Outstanding Youth Fund of Peking Union Medical College Hospital; Contract grant number: JQ201704; Contract grant sponsor: National Natural Science Foundation of China; Contract grant number: 81871512; Contract grant sponsor: National Public Welfare Basic Scientific Research Program of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences; Contract grant numbers: 2018PT32003 and 2017PT32004.

BACKGROUND

Both compressed-sensing (CS) and gradient- and spin-echo (GRASE) sequences can achieve 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with a single breath-hold (BH). This work hypothesized that compared with conventional navigator-triggered (NT)-MRCP, the two BH-MRCP protocols, GRASE and CS, may provide better imaging quality, especially for patients with irregular breathing.

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the image quality and diagnostic performance of three MRCP protocols.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

SUBJECTS

Seventy-four patients suspected to have duct-related pathologies were enrolled.

FIELD STRENGTH

3.0T.

SEQUENCES

NT-MRCP, BH-CS-MRCP, and BH-GRASE-MRCP.

ASSESSMENT

Breath regularity was evaluated subjectively according to the respiratory waves. The acquisition time was compared. The pancreaticobiliary system was divided into 12 segments and evaluated on a 5-point scale. The diagnostic performance of the three MRCPs was evaluated and compared.

STATISTICAL TESTS

The Friedman test with a post-hoc test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, McNemar test, and Kendall's W test were used.

RESULTS

The BH-MRCP decreased the scan time significantly (P < 0.05). The overall imaging scores of GRASE-MRCP and CS-MRCP were significantly higher than that of NT-MRCP for patients with irregular breathing (4.283 and 4.283 vs. 3.000, both P < 0.05). Compared with NT-MRCP, the diagnostic performance of BH-CS and BH-GRASE MRCP was significantly improved for patients with irregular breathing (AUC = 0.860 and 0.863 vs. 0.572, both P < 0.001).

DATA CONCLUSION

Compared with conventional NT-MRCP, the overall imaging quality and diagnostic performance of BH-CS and BH-GRASE MRCP were not significantly different for patients with regular breathing and significantly superior for patients with irregular breathing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:824-832.

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography using optimized integrated combination with parallel imaging and compressed sensing technique

PURPOSE

To assess the combined parallel imaging (PI) and optimized integrated compressed sensing technique (prototype Compressed SENSE) for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared with conventional MRCP.

METHODS

This prospective study was approved by our Institutional Review Board, and all patients provided written informed consent. A total of 56 consecutive patients (27 men and 29 women; mean age 67.2 years) underwent breath-hold three-dimensional (3D) MRCP with PI alone (BH-MRCP; acquisition time, 23 s), respiratory-triggered 3D MRCP with PI alone (RT-MRCP; 201 s) and respiratory-triggered 3D MRCP with Compressed SENSE (RT-MRCPcs; 45 s). Relative duct-to-periductal contrast ratios (RCs) of the pancreaticobiliary ducts were calculated for quantitative image analyses. Two radiologists graded the visibility of the pancreaticobiliary ducts, pancreatic cystic lesion, motion artifact, and overall image quality using a five-point rating scale for qualitative image analyses. Theses qualitative and quantitative measurements were then compared among the three sequences.

RESULTS

RCs of the common bile duct, right hepatic duct (RHD), left hepatic duct (LHD), and main pancreatic duct at the pancreatic head, body, and tail segments, were significantly higher RT-MRCP, followed by RT-MRCPcs and BH-MRCP (P < 0.001). The visibility of the peripheral RHD and LHD was slightly better in RT-MRCP than in RT-MRCPcs and BH-MRCP (P < 0.001). The visibility of other pancreaticobiliary ducts, pancreatic cystic lesion, motion artifact, and overall image quality were almost comparable among three sequences.

CONCLUSION

The acquisition time was markedly reduced in RT-MRCPcs compared with conventional RT-MRCP while there were significant differences in both quantitative and qualitative analyses, the differences were small enough that the reduced acquisition time makes up for it.