1
|
Barsky AR, Lin H, Mendes A, Dreyfuss A, Wright C, Anstadt EJ, Berman AT, Levin WP, Cengel KA, Anderson N, Dong L, Metz JM, Li T, Feigenberg S. Initial Clinical Experience Treating Patients With Lung Cancer on a 6MV-Flattening-Filter-Free O-Ring Linear Accelerator. Cureus 2020; 12:e10325. [PMID: 33052286 PMCID: PMC7546605 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.10325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Modern technologies, like intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), have improved the therapeutic ratio of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) for lung cancer (LC). Halcyon™ (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA), a novel 6MV-flattening-filter-free O-ring linear accelerator (6X-FFF ORL), was designed to deliver IMRT and VMAT with greater speed than a C-arm linac. Herein, we report our initial clinical experience treating patients with LC on this linac. Methods All patients who received TRT for LC on the 6X-FFF ORL at our institution were retrospectively identified. Patients' clinicopathologic data, radiotherapy details, early disease-control and toxicity outcomes, dosimetric data, couch corrections, and treatment times are reported. Results Between 10/2018-12/2019, 30 consecutive patients (median age 66 years, range 54-94 years) received definitive or post-operative TRT for LC (median 66 Gy/33 fractions; range 5-70 Gy/2-37 fractions) following four-dimensional computed tomography (CT) simulation (97%) using daily kilovoltage KV cone-beam CT (CBCT) (100%) on a 6X-FFF ORL for non-small cell LC (84%) or small cell LC (16%), with 53% receiving VMAT, 43% receiving static-field IMRT, and 77% receiving concurrent systemic therapy. All plans were approved through institutional peer review. The average three-dimensional vector couch correction based on CBCT guidance was 0.90 ± 0.50 cm. The average beam-on and beam on plus CBCT times were 1.7 ± 1.1 min, and 5.0 ± 3.2 min, respectively. Grade 3 dyspnea and fatigue occurred in 3% and 3% of patients, respectively. There were no grade ≥4 toxicities. Conclusion In this first clinical report of TRT for LC on a 6X-FFF ORL, daily CBCT-guided treatment was fast and safe with respect to dosimetry and clinical outcomes. Thus, use of this linac for TRT may increase LC patient throughput without a detriment in radiotherapy quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew R Barsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Hui Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Amberly Mendes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Alexandra Dreyfuss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Christopher Wright
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Emily J Anstadt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Abigail T Berman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - William P Levin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Keith A Cengel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Nathan Anderson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Lei Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - James M Metz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Taoran Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Steven Feigenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mukai Y, Omura M, Hashimoto H, Matsui K, Hongo H, Yamakabe W, Yoshida M, Hata M, Inoue T. Treatment outcome for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer using TomoDirect plan and its characteristics compared to the TomoHelical plan. J Med Radiat Sci 2018; 65:55-62. [PMID: 29393591 PMCID: PMC5846024 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2017] [Revised: 10/31/2017] [Accepted: 01/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction TomoDirect (TD) is an intensity‐modulated radiotherapy system that uses a fixed gantry angle instead of the rotational beam delivery used in the TomoHelical (TH) system. This study was performed (1) to evaluate the treatment outcome of the TD plan for locally advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and (2) to compare the characteristics of TD plans with those of TH plans. Methods Twenty‐one patients with NSCLC were treated using the TD system. The prescribed dose was 40 Gy/20 Fx for the initial planning target volume (PTV), which included the gross tumour volume (GTV) and lymph node regions. A boost plan of 20 Gy/10 Fx was then applied, focusing on the GTV. For the planning study, matched TH plans of 40 Gy for the initial PTV were created for each patient, to meet the same dosimetric constraints specified in the TD plans. Results The 2‐year overall survival, progression‐free survival and local control rates were 47%, 45% and 74% respectively. Grade 2 treatment‐related pneumonitis occurred in three (14%) patients. The planning study comparing TD and TH showed that dose distribution to GTV and PTV were not significantly different. The lung V5 Gy was lower in the TD plans than TH plans (46.4 ± 5.4 vs. 52.3 ± 8.5), while the V20 Gy was higher (26.2 ± 4 vs. 24 ± 4.3). The TD plans had a significantly shorter treatment time than TH plans (4.5 ± 1.3 min vs. 9.8 ± 1.5 min). Conclusions TD is a clinically acceptable treatment option for NSCSL. The quality of the TD and TH plans are comparable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Mukai
- Department of Radiology, Yokohama City University, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Motoko Omura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Harumitu Hashimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shonan Fujisawa Tokushukai Hospital, Fujisawa, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kengo Matsui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Hongo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Wataru Yamakabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Miwa Yoshida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masaharu Hata
- Department of Radiology, Yokohama City University, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Tomio Inoue
- Department of Radiology, Yokohama City University, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|