1
|
Yegya-Raman N, Berman AT, Ciunci CA, Friedes C, Berlin E, Iocolano M, Wang X, Lai C, Levin WP, Cengel KA, O'Reilly SE, Cohen RB, Aggarwal C, Marmarelis ME, Singh AP, Sun L, Bradley JD, Plastaras JP, Simone CB, Langer CJ, Feigenberg SJ. Phase 2 Trial of Consolidation Pembrolizumab After Proton Reirradiation for Thoracic Recurrences of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:56-65. [PMID: 37652303 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.08.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Reirradiation (reRT) with proton beam therapy (PBT) may offer a chance of cure while minimizing toxicity for patients with isolated intrathoracic recurrences of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, distant failure remains common, necessitating strategies to integrate more effective systemic therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS This was a phase 2, single-arm trial (NCT03087760) of consolidation pembrolizumab after PBT reRT for locoregional recurrences of NSCLC. Four to 12 weeks after completion of 60 to 70 Gy PBT reRT, patients without progressive disease received pembrolizumab for up to 12 months. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), measured from the start of reRT. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0 toxicity. RESULTS Between 2017 and 2021, 22 patients received PBT reRT. Median interval from prior radiation end to reRT start was 20 months. Most recurrences (91%) were centrally located. Most patients received concurrent chemotherapy (95%) and pencil beam scanning PBT (77%), and 36% had received prior durvalumab. Fifteen patients (68%) initiated consolidation pembrolizumab on trial and received a median of 3 cycles (range, 2-17). Pembrolizumab was discontinued most commonly due to toxicity (n = 5; 2 were pembrolizumab-related), disease progression (n = 4), and completion of 1 year (n = 3). Median follow-up was 38.7 months. Median PFS and OS were 8.8 months (95% CI, 4.2-23.7) and 22.8 months (95% CI, 6.9-not reached), respectively. There was only one isolated in-field failure after reRT. Grade ≥3 toxicities occurred in 10 patients (45%); 2 were pembrolizumab-related. There were 2 grade 5 toxicities, an aorto-esophageal fistula at 6.9 months and hemoptysis at 46.8 months, both probably from reRT. The trial closed early due to widespread adoption of immunotherapy off-protocol. CONCLUSIONS In the first-ever prospective trial combining PBT reRT with consolidation immunotherapy, PFS was acceptable and OS favorable. Late grade 5 toxicity occurred in 2 of 22 patients. This approach may be considered in selected patients with isolated thoracic recurrences of NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil Yegya-Raman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Abigail T Berman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Christine A Ciunci
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Cole Friedes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Eva Berlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Michelle Iocolano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Xingmei Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ching Lai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - William P Levin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Keith A Cengel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Shannon E O'Reilly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Roger B Cohen
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Charu Aggarwal
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Melina E Marmarelis
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Aditi P Singh
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Lova Sun
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jeffrey D Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - John P Plastaras
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Charles B Simone
- New York Proton Center, New York, New York; Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Corey J Langer
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Steven J Feigenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yegya-Raman N, Friedes C, Lee SH, Iocolano M, Duan L, Wang X, Li B, Aggarwal C, Cohen RB, Su W, Doucette A, Levin WP, Cengel KA, DiBardino D, Teo BKK, O'Reilly SE, Sun L, Bradley JD, Xiao Y, Langer CJ, Feigenberg SJ. Pneumonitis Rates Before and After Adoption of Immunotherapy Consolidation in Patients With Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:1445-1454. [PMID: 37619788 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.08.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We hypothesized that after adoption of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) consolidation for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) receiving concurrent chemoradiation therapy (cCRT), rates of symptomatic pneumonitis would increase, thereby supporting efforts to reduce lung radiation dose. METHODS AND MATERIALS This single institution, multisite retrospective study included 783 patients with LA-NSCLC treated with definitive cCRT either before introduction of ICI consolidation (pre-ICI era cohort [January 2011-September 2017]; N = 448) or afterward (ICI era cohort [October 2017-December 2021]; N = 335). Primary endpoint was grade ≥2 pneumonitis (G2P) and secondary endpoint was grade ≥3 pneumonitis (G3P), per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. Pneumonitis was compared between pre-ICI era and ICI era cohorts using the cumulative incidence function and Gray's test. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Fine-Gray models were generated. Logistic models were developed to predict the 1-year probability of G2P as a function of lung dosimetry. RESULTS G2P was higher in the ICI era than in the pre-ICI era (1-year cumulative incidence 31.4% vs 20.1%; P < .001; IPTW-adjusted multivariable subdistribution hazard ratio, 2.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-2.70; P < .001). There was no significant interaction between ICI era treatment and either lung volume receiving ≥20 Gy (V20) or mean lung dose in Fine-Gray regression for G2P; however, the predicted probability of G2P was higher in the ICI era at clinically relevant values of lung V20 (≥24%) and mean lung dose (≥14 Gy). Cut-point analysis revealed a lung V20 threshold of 28% in the ICI era (1-year G2P rate 46.0% above vs 19.8% below; P < .001). Among patients receiving ICI consolidation, lung V5 was not associated with G2P. G3P was not higher in the ICI era (1-year cumulative incidence 7.5% vs 6.0%; P = .39; IPTW-adjusted multivariable subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-2.01; P = .70). CONCLUSIONS In patients with LA-NSCLC treated with cCRT, the adoption of ICI consolidation was associated with an increase in G2P but not G3P. With ICI consolidation, stricter lung dose constraints may be warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Bolin Li
- Departments of Radiation Oncology
| | - Charu Aggarwal
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Roger B Cohen
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Abigail Doucette
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - David DiBardino
- Section of Interventional Pulmonology and Thoracic Oncology, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Lova Sun
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Corey J Langer
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Friedes C, Iocolano M, Lee SH, Li B, Duan L, Levin WP, Cengel KA, Sun LL, Aggarwal C, Marmarelis ME, Doucette A, Cohen RB, Xiao Y, Langer CJ, Bradley J, Feigenberg SJ, Yegya-Raman N. Patterns of Failure, Low-Volume Relapse, and Subsequent Ablative Management in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Definitive Chemoradiation and Consolidation Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:1435-1444. [PMID: 37866762 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 09/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this study was to describe the patterns of failure, frequency of low-volume relapse (LVR), and candidacy for ablative therapy at time of disease progression (PD) after chemoradiation and consolidative immunotherapy (CRT + ICI) in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS We identified 229 consecutive patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated with CRT + ICI between October 2017 and December 2021 at a single institution. PD was classified as isolated locoregional failure (LRF), isolated distant failure (DF), or synchronous LRF + DF. Any LRF was subclassified as in-field failure, marginal failure, or out-of-field failure. LVR was defined as 3 or fewer sites of PD in any number of organs. Ablative candidates were defined as having 5 or fewer sites of PD radiographically amenable to high-dose radiation or surgery. Time-to-event data were calculated using cumulative incidence analysis and Kaplan-Meier methods. Multivariable Cox modeling was used to examine the correlations between characteristics of relapse and postprogression survival. RESULTS Of the 229 patients, 119 (52%) had PD. Of these 119 patients, 20 (21%) had isolated LRF, 28 (24%) had synchronous LRF + DF, and 71 (60%) had isolated DF. Of the 48 patients with any LRF, 28 (58%) had in-field failure, 10 (21%) marginal failure, and 10 (21%) out-of-field failure. The cumulative incidence of LRF and DF was 13% (95% CI, 9.2%-18%) and 32% (95% CI, 26%-38%) at 1 year and 19% (95% CI, 14%-24%) and 39% (95% CI, 33%-46%) at 2 years, respectively. Overall, 64 patients (54%) were considered to have LVR. At time of PD, 60 patients (50%) were eligible for ablative therapy. Patients with LVR had longer median survival versus with high-volume relapse (37.4 vs 15.2 months, P < .001). On multivariable analysis, LVR (hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.18-0.56; P < .001) was associated with improved postprogression survival. CONCLUSIONS After CRT + ICI, approximately half of patients experience LVR at time of PD and are candidates for ablative therapies. Prospective trials are needed to validate the optimal treatment strategy for LVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cole Friedes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Michelle Iocolano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sang Ho Lee
- Division of Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Bolin Li
- Division of Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Lian Duan
- Division of Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - William P Levin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Keith A Cengel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Lova L Sun
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Charu Aggarwal
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Melina E Marmarelis
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Abigail Doucette
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Roger B Cohen
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ying Xiao
- Division of Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Corey J Langer
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jeffrey Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Steven J Feigenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Nikhil Yegya-Raman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Iocolano M, Yegya-Raman N, Friedes C, Wang X, Kegelman T, Lee SH, Duan L, Li B, Levin WP, Cengel KA, Konski A, Langer CJ, Cohen RB, Sun L, Aggarwal C, Doucette A, Xiao Y, Kevin Teo BK, O'Reilly S, Zou W, Bradley JD, Simone CB, Feigenberg SJ. Acute hospitalizations after proton therapy versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the durvalumab era. Cancer 2024. [PMID: 38294959 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Revised: 11/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION It was hypothesized that use of proton beam therapy (PBT) in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiation and consolidative immune checkpoint inhibition is associated with fewer unplanned hospitalizations compared with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS Patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated between October 2017 and December 2021 with concurrent chemoradiation with either IMRT or PBT ± consolidative immune checkpoint inhibition were retrospectively identified. Logistic regression was used to assess the association of radiation therapy technique with 90-day hospitalization and grade 3 (G3+) lymphopenia. Competing risk regression was used to compare G3+ pneumonitis, G3+ esophagitis, and G3+ cardiac events. Kaplan-Meier method was used for progression-free survival and overall survival. Inverse probability treatment weighting was applied to adjust for differences in PBT and IMRT groups. RESULTS Of 316 patients, 117 (37%) received PBT and 199 (63%) received IMRT. The PBT group was older (p < .001) and had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores (p = .02). The PBT group received a lower mean heart dose (p < .0001), left anterior descending artery V15 Gy (p = .001), mean lung dose (p = .008), and effective dose to immune circulating cells (p < .001). On inverse probability treatment weighting analysis, PBT was associated with fewer unplanned hospitalizations (adjusted odds ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.38-0.81; p = .002) and less G3+ lymphopenia (adjusted odds ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.37-0.81; p = .003). There was no difference in other G3+ toxicities, progression-free survival, or overall survival. CONCLUSIONS PBT is associated with fewer unplanned hospitalizations, lower effective dose to immune circulating cells and less G3+ lymphopenia compared with IMRT. Minimizing dose to lymphocytes may be warranted, but prospective data are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Iocolano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nikhil Yegya-Raman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Cole Friedes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Xingmei Wang
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Timothy Kegelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Delaware Radiation Oncology Associates, Christiana Care Health Systems, Newark, Delaware, USA
| | - Sang Ho Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Physics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lian Duan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Physics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bolin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Physics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - William P Levin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Keith A Cengel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Andre Konski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Corey J Langer
- Division of Hematology/Oncology University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Roger B Cohen
- Division of Hematology/Oncology University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lova Sun
- Division of Hematology/Oncology University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Charu Aggarwal
- Division of Hematology/Oncology University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Abigail Doucette
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ying Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Physics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Boon-Keng Kevin Teo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Physics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Shannon O'Reilly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Physics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Wei Zou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Physics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jeffrey D Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Steven J Feigenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Friedes C, Yegya-Raman N, Zhang S, Iocolano M, Cohen RB, Aggarwal C, Thompson JC, Marmarelis ME, Levin WP, Cengel KA, Ciunci CA, Singh AP, D'Avella C, Davis CW, Langer CJ, Feigenberg SJ. Patterns of Failure in Metastatic NSCLC Treated With First Line Pembrolizumab and Use of Local Therapy in Patients With Oligoprogression. Clin Lung Cancer 2024; 25:50-60.e6. [PMID: 37813713 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2023.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The patterns of failure (POF) for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) treated with immunotherapy are not well established. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of mNSCLC that received first-line pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy at a single academic center from 2015 to 2021. We defined POF with 2 classifications: 1) local, regional, or distant failure, or 2) failure in existing lesions, new lesions, or a combination. Oligoprogression was defined as disease progression (PD) in ≤3 sites of failure. Overall survival (OS) was measured via Kaplan-Meier and modelled with Cox regression. RESULTS Of 298 patients identified, 198 had PD. Using POF classification 1, most failures were distant (43.9%) or a combination of locoregional and distant (34.4%). For POF classification 2, failures occurred in a combination of new and existing lesions (45.0%), existing lesions alone (33.3%), or in new lesions only (21.7%). Oligoprogression occurred in 39.9% (n = 79) cases. Median OS was higher in the following: PD in existing lesions vs. new or new + existing lesions (28.7 vs. 20.2 vs. 13.9 months, P < .001) and oligoprogression vs. polyprogression (35.1 vs. 12.2 months, P < .001). In oligoprogression, median OS was better for those who received radiation to all sites of PD (62.2 months) than for those who changed systemic therapy (22.9 months, P = .007). On multivariable analysis, radiation for oligoprogression (HR 0.35, 95% CI: 0.20-0.62, P < .001) was associated with improved OS. CONCLUSIONS In mNSCLC treated with pembrolizumab, oligoprogression is relatively common. Randomized data are needed to define the benefits of radiation in oligoprogressive mNSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cole Friedes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
| | - Nikhil Yegya-Raman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Siqi Zhang
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Michelle Iocolano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Roger B Cohen
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Charu Aggarwal
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jeffrey C Thompson
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Melina E Marmarelis
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - William P Levin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Keith A Cengel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Christine A Ciunci
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Aditi P Singh
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Christopher D'Avella
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Christiana W Davis
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Corey J Langer
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Steven J Feigenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yegya-Raman N, Ho Lee S, Friedes C, Wang X, Iocolano M, Kegelman TP, Duan L, Li B, Berlin E, Kim KN, Doucette A, Denduluri S, Levin WP, Cengel KA, Cohen RB, Langer CJ, Kevin Teo BK, Zou W, O'Quinn RP, Deasy JO, Bradley JD, Sun L, Ky B, Xiao Y, Feigenberg SJ. Cardiac radiation dose is associated with inferior survival but not cardiac events in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitor consolidation. Radiother Oncol 2024; 190:110005. [PMID: 37972736 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 10/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We assessed the association of cardiac radiation dose with cardiac events and survival post-chemoradiation therapy (CRT) in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) after adoption of modern radiation therapy (RT) techniques, stricter cardiac dose constraints, and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) consolidation. METHODS AND MATERIALS This single-institution, multi-site retrospective study included 335 patients with LA-NSCLC treated with definitive, concurrent CRT between October 2017 and December 2021. All patients were evaluated for ICI consolidation. Planning dose constraints included heart mean dose < 20 Gy (<10 Gy if feasible) and heart volume receiving ≥ 50 Gy (V50Gy) < 25 %. Twenty-one dosimetric parameters for three different cardiac structures (heart, left anterior descending coronary artery [LAD], and left ventricle) were extracted. Primary endpoint was any major adverse cardiac event (MACE) post-CRT, defined as acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, coronary revascularization, or cardiac-related death. Secondary endpoints were: grade ≥ 3 cardiac events (per CTCAE v5.0), overall survival (OS), lung cancer-specific mortality (LCSM), and other-cause mortality (OCM). RESULTS Median age was 68 years, 139 (41 %) had baseline coronary heart disease, and 225 (67 %) received ICI consolidation. Proton therapy was used in 117 (35 %) and intensity-modulated RT in 199 (59 %). Median LAD V15Gy was 1.4 % (IQR 0-22) and median heart mean dose was 8.7 Gy (IQR 4.6-14.4). Median follow-up was 3.3 years. Two-year cumulative incidence of MACE was 9.5 % for all patients and 14.3 % for those with baseline coronary heart disease. Two-year cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 3 cardiac events was 20.4 %. No cardiac dosimetric parameter was associated with an increased risk of MACE or grade ≥ 3 cardiac events. On multivariable analysis, cardiac dose (LAD V15Gy and heart mean dose) was associated with worse OS, driven by an association with LCSM but not OCM. CONCLUSIONS With modern RT techniques, stricter cardiac dose constraints, and ICI consolidation, cardiac dose was associated with LCSM but not OCM or cardiac events in patients with LA-NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil Yegya-Raman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Sang Ho Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Cole Friedes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Xingmei Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michelle Iocolano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Timothy P Kegelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Delaware Radiation Oncology Associates, Christiana Care Health Systems, Newark, DE, USA
| | - Lian Duan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Bolin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Eva Berlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kristine N Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Abigail Doucette
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Srinivas Denduluri
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - William P Levin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Keith A Cengel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Roger B Cohen
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Corey J Langer
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Boon-Keng Kevin Teo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Wei Zou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rupal P O'Quinn
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joseph O Deasy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey D Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lova Sun
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Bonnie Ky
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ying Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Steven J Feigenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Friedes C, Iocolano M, Lee SH, Duan L, Li B, Doucette A, Cohen RB, Aggarwal C, Sun LL, Levin WP, Cengel KA, Kao G, Teo BKK, Langer CJ, Xiao Y, Bradley J, Feigenberg SJ, Yegya-Raman N. The effective radiation dose to immune cells predicts lymphopenia and inferior cancer control in locally advanced NSCLC. Radiother Oncol 2024; 190:110030. [PMID: 38008414 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore the association of the effective dose to immune cells (EDIC) with disease control, lymphopenia, and toxicity in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and identify methods to reduce EDIC. METHODS We abstracted data from all patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with chemoradiation with or without consolidative immunotherapy over a ten-year period. Associations between EDIC and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were modeled with Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier method. Logistic regression was used to model predictors of lymphopenia and higher EDIC. Analyses were performed with EDIC as a continuous and categorical variable. Lymphopenia was graded per CTCAE v5.0. RESULTS Overall, 786 patients were included (228 of which received consolidative immunotherapy); median EDIC was 4.7 Gy. Patients with EDIC < 4.7 Gy had a longer median PFS (15.3 vs. 9.0 months; p < 0.001) and OS (34.2 vs. 22.4 months; p < 0.001). On multivariable modeling, EDIC correlated with inferior PFS (HR 1.08, 95 % CI 1.01-1.14, p = 0.014) and OS (HR 1.10, 95 % CI 1.04-1.18, p = 0.002). EDIC was predictive of grade 4 lymphopenia (OR 1.16, 95 % CI 1.02-1.33, p = 0.026). EDIC ≥ 4.7 Gy was associated with increased grade 2 + pneumonitis (6-month incidence: 26 % vs 20 %, p = 0.04) and unplanned hospitalizations (90-day incidence: 40 % vs 30 %, p = 0.002). Compared to protons, photon therapy was associated with EDIC ≥ 4.7 Gy (OR 5.26, 95 % CI 3.71-7.69, p < 0.001) in multivariable modeling. CONCLUSIONS EDIC is associated with inferior disease outcomes, treatment-related toxicity, and the development of severe lymphopenia. Proton therapy is associated with lower EDIC. Further investigations to limit radiation dose to the immune system appear warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cole Friedes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
| | - Michelle Iocolano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Sang Ho Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Physics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Lian Duan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Physics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Bolin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Physics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Abigail Doucette
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Roger B Cohen
- Division of Hematology/Oncology University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Charu Aggarwal
- Division of Hematology/Oncology University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Lova L Sun
- Division of Hematology/Oncology University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - William P Levin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Keith A Cengel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Gary Kao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Boon-Keng Kevin Teo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Physics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Corey J Langer
- Division of Hematology/Oncology University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Ying Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Physics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Jeffrey Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Steven J Feigenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Nikhil Yegya-Raman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Barsouk A, Friedes C, Iocolano M, Doucette A, Cohen RB, Robinson KW, D'Avella CA, Marmarelis ME, Kosteva JA, Singh AP, Ciunci CA, Levin WP, Cengel KA, Bradley JD, Feigenberg SJ, Sun L, Aggarwal C, Langer CJ, Yegya-Raman N. Plunging Into the PACIFIC: Outcomes of Patients With Unresectable KRAS-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Following Definitive Chemoradiation and Durvalumab Consolidation. Clin Lung Cancer 2023:S1525-7304(23)00266-8. [PMID: 38195320 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2023.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) consolidation following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) substantially improved progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the PACIFIC trial becoming the standard of care in locally-advanced, unresectable NSCLC. KRAS mutation may influence response to ICI. METHODS In this single-institution, retrospective analysis, we compared treatment outcomes for patients with unresectable KRAS mutated (KRAS-mt) and wild-type (KRAS-wt) NSCLC treated with CRT between October 2017 and December 2021. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted comparing median progression free survival and median overall survival from completion of radiotherapy in all KRAS-mt patients and KRAS-G12C-mutated patients. Outcomes were also compared with and without ICI consolidation. RESULTS Of 156 patients, 42 (26.9%) were KRAS-mt and 114 (73.1%) were KRAS-wt. Baseline characteristics differed only in histology; KRAS-mt NSCLC more likely to be adenocarcinoma. KRAS-mt patients had worse PFS (median 6.3 vs. 10.7 months, P = .041) but similar OS (median 23.1 vs. 27.3 months, P = .237). KRAS-mt patients were more likely to not receive ICI due to rapid disease progression post-CRT (23.8% vs. 4.4%, P = .007). Among patients who received ICI (n = 114), KRAS-mt was not associated with inferior PFS (8.1 vs. 11.9 months, P = .355) or OS (30.5 vs. 31.7 months, P = .692). KRAS-G12C patients (n = 22) had similar PFS and OS to other KRAS-mt. CONCLUSION In one of the largest post-CRT KRAS-mt cohort published, KRAS-mt was associated with inferior PFS, largely due to rapid progression prior to ICI consolidation, but did not affect OS. Among those who received ICI consolidation, outcomes were comparable regardless of KRAS-mt status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Barsouk
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
| | - Cole Friedes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Michelle Iocolano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Abigail Doucette
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Roger B Cohen
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kyle W Robinson
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Christopher A D'Avella
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Melina E Marmarelis
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - John A Kosteva
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Aditi P Singh
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Christine A Ciunci
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - William P Levin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Keith A Cengel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jeffrey D Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Steven J Feigenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Lova Sun
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Charu Aggarwal
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Corey J Langer
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Nikhil Yegya-Raman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Simone CB, Yegya-Raman N, Manjunath S, Verma V, Shabason JE, Xu L, Cengel KA, Levin WP, Berman AT, Christodouleas JP, Aggarwal C, Cohen RB, Langer CJ, Pechet TT, Singhal S, Kucharczuk JC, Rengan R, Feigenberg SJ. Prospective Feasibility and Phase 1/2 Trial of Preoperative Proton Beam Therapy With Concurrent Chemotherapy for Resectable Stage IIIA or Superior Sulcus Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:683-689. [PMID: 37201756 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; New York Proton Center, New York, New York; Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nikhil Yegya-Raman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Shwetha Manjunath
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jacob E Shabason
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Lee Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; New York Proton Center, New York, New York
| | - Keith A Cengel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - William P Levin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Abigail T Berman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - John P Christodouleas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Charu Aggarwal
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Roger B Cohen
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Corey J Langer
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Taine T Pechet
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sunil Singhal
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - John C Kucharczuk
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ramesh Rengan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Steven J Feigenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yegya-Raman N, Lee SH, Friedes C, Iocolano M, Kim KN, Duan L, Li B, Sun L, Cohen R, Cengel KA, Levin WP, Langer C, Aggarwal C, Ky B, O'Quinn RP, Zou W, Teo K, Deasy JO, Xiao Y, Feigenberg SJ. Association of Cardiac Dose with Cardiac Events and Survival for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (LA-NSCLC) Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) Consolidation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:S169-S170. [PMID: 37784421 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) To assess the association of cardiac dose with post-cCRT cardiac events and survival among patients (pts) with LA-NSCLC after adoption of ICI consolidation, modern radiotherapy (RT) techniques, and data-driven cardiac constraints. MATERIALS/METHODS This single-institution, multi-site retrospective study included 335 pts with LA-NSCLC treated with definitive cCRT (60-70 Gy) from October 2017 to December 2021. Pts were evaluated for ICI consolidation. Cardiac dose constraints included heart volume receiving ≥50 Gy (V50) <25% and mean heart dose (MHD) <20 Gy. Heart, left anterior descending artery (LAD), and left ventricle were autocontoured, manually reviewed, and edited. 21 dosimetric parameters (mean dose, max dose, and min dose to the hottest x% volume [Dx%(Gy); x from 5-95 in 5% intervals]) for each were extracted, as well as LAD V15. Baseline cardiovascular disease (bCVD) was defined as heart failure (HF), coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, or cerebrovascular disease. Primary endpoint was post-cCRT major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as acute coronary syndrome, HF hospitalization/urgent visit, coronary revascularization, or cardiac death. Secondary endpoints were grade ≥3 cardiac events (CTCAE v5.0), overall survival (OS), cancer specific mortality (CSM), and other cause mortality (OCM). Competing risk regression was used for MACE and grade ≥3 cardiac events, and Cox regression for OS, CSM, and OCM. RESULTS Median age was 68 years, 139 (41%) had bCVD, and 225 (67%) received consolidation ICI. Proton therapy was used in 117 (35%), intensity-modulated RT in 199 (59%), and 3D conformal RT in 19 (6%). Median MHD was 8.7 Gy (IQR 4.6-14.4) and median LAD V15 1.4% (IQR 0-22). Median follow-up was 39.5 months. 35 MACE events occurred; 1- and 2-year cumulative incidence (CI) were 4.2% and 9.5%. No cardiac dosimetric parameter associated with MACE after adjusting for bCVD and age (e.g., MHD sHR 0.98/Gy, 95% CI 0.93-1.03, p = 0.43) or within the following 3 subgroups: no bCVD, photon therapy, and ICI consolidation. 87 grade ≥3 cardiac events occurred; 1- and 2- year CI were 12.6% and 20.4%. Heart dose was not associated with grade ≥3 cardiac events after adjusting for bCVD, ECOG, and BMI (e.g., MHD sHR 1.00/Gy, 95% CI 0.97-1.03, p = 0.85) or within the 3 aforesaid subgroups. 183 OS events occurred, including 125 CSM and 58 OCM events. Multiple cardiac dosimetric parameters associated with worse OS on multivariable analysis (e.g., LAD V15 HR 1.01/%, 95% CI 1.00-1.02, p = 0.003), driven by associations with CSM (LAD V15 HR 1.02/%, p<0.001) but not OCM (LAD V15 HR 1.00/%, p = 0.73). Median OS was worse for LAD V15 ≥10% (22.2 vs 35.1 months, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION Among pts with LA-NSCLC treated with cCRT after adoption of ICI consolidation, modern RT techniques, and cardiac constraints, post-cCRT cardiac events were common but showed no association with cardiac dose. Cardiac dose associated with OS, driven by an association with CSM and not OCM, which may not reflect cardiac toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Yegya-Raman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - S H Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - C Friedes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - M Iocolano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - K N Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - L Duan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - B Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - L Sun
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - R Cohen
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - K A Cengel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - W P Levin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - C Langer
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - C Aggarwal
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - B Ky
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - R P O'Quinn
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - W Zou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - K Teo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - J O Deasy
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Y Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - S J Feigenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Iocolano M, Yegya-Raman N, Wang X, Friedes C, Lee SH, Duan L, Li B, Levin WP, Cengel KA, Langer C, Cohen R, Sun L, Aggarwal C, Doucette A, Xiao Y, Teo K, O'Reilly SE, Zou W, Simone CB, Feigenberg SJ. Proton Beam Therapy (PBT) Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (LA-NSCLC) in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) Consolidation: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e26. [PMID: 37784996 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Patients (pts) with LA-NSCLC treated with concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT) and ICI consolidation are at high risk for treatment-related toxicities and subsequent hospitalization. We hypothesized that PBT is associated with a reduction in acute unplanned hospitalizations as compared to IMRT in the era of ICI consolidation. MATERIALS/METHODS This single institution, multi-site retrospective study included consecutive pts with LA-NSCLC treated with definitive cCRT with either PBT or IMRT from October 2017 to December 2021. Pts were evaluated for consolidative ICI. Primary endpoint was unplanned treatment-related hospitalization within 90 days of first radiation (RT) treatment. Secondary endpoints included grade 3+ pneumonitis, grade 3+ esophagitis, PFS and OS. Logistic regression was used to assess associations with 90-day hospitalization. Competing risk regression was used for grade 3+ pneumonitis and esophagitis, and Cox regression for PFS and OS. RESULTS A total of 316 pts were included: 117 (37%) received PBT and 199 (63%) IMRT. Median age was 68.5 yrs; median RT dose 66.6 Gy (IQR 65.9-70.0). PBT group was older (median 71.1 vs 67.2 yrs, p<0.005) and had a higher Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) (median 4 vs 3, p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in ECOG, smoking pack-years, T stage, N stage, target volume size, or receipt of ICI consolidation (66.7% vs 68.3%, p = 0.76). PBT group had lower mean heart dose (5.9 vs 10.8 Gy, p<0.001), LAD V15 (0 vs 6 %, p = 0.001), mean lung dose (14.7 vs 15.7 Gy, p <0.008) and effective dose to immune circulating cells (median 3.7 vs 4.9 Gy, p<0.001) but not mean esophagus dose. PBT was associated with fewer unplanned 90-day hospitalizations (23.9% vs 34.7%); which persisted on multivariable analysis (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.30-0.90, p = 0.02) after adjusting for CCI, smoking pack-years, T4 tumors and target volume. Reasons for hospitalization in PBT and IMRT groups included progression (1.7% vs 1.5%), definite/probable toxicity from cCRT (11.1% vs 18.6%), possible toxicity from cCRT (7.7% vs 12.6%) or unrelated to cCRT (3.4% vs 2.0%). There was no significant difference between PBT or IMRT groups in G3+ pneumonitis (1-year 6.0% vs 9.1%, p = 0.49), G3+ esophagitis (1-year 6.0% vs 6.5%, p = 0.71), PFS (median 14.4 vs 15.1 months, p = 0.69), or OS (median 34.2 vs 29.4 months, p = 0.41). CONCLUSION Among pts with LA-NSCLC treated with cCRT in the era of ICI consolidation, PBT was associated with fewer acute unplanned hospitalizations compared to IMRT. There was no difference in G3+ pneumonitis, G3+ esophagitis, PFS or OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Iocolano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - N Yegya-Raman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - X Wang
- University of Pennsylvania, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Philadelphia, PA
| | - C Friedes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - S H Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - L Duan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - B Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - W P Levin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - K A Cengel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - C Langer
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - R Cohen
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - L Sun
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - C Aggarwal
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - A Doucette
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Y Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - K Teo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - S E O'Reilly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - W Zou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - S J Feigenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Friedes C, Yegya-Raman N, Iocolano M, Lee SH, Li B, Duan L, Levin WP, Cengel KA, Sun L, Aggarwal C, Marmarelis ME, Doucette A, Cohen R, Xiao Y, Langer C, Feigenberg SJ. Patterns of Failure, Volume of Disease Progression, and Subsequent Ablative Management in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (LA-NSCLC) Treated with Definitive Chemoradiation and Consolidation Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e18-e19. [PMID: 37784800 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) For patients (pts) with LA-NSCLC treated with chemoradiation and consolidation ICI (CRT+ICI), the patterns of failure (POF) and volume of disease progression (PD) are not well characterized. The primary objective of this study was to classify POFs, the frequency of low volume relapse (LVR), and identify pts eligible for further ablative therapy. MATERIALS/METHODS We retrospectively identified pts with unresectable stage III NSCLC treated with CRT+ICI between October 2017 and December 2021 at a single institution. Site of first failure was classified as locoregional (LRF), distant (DF), or synchronous LRF + DF. Any LRF was subclassified as in field (IFF; PD within 90% isodose line), marginal (MF; within 50% isodose line) or out of field (OOF; outside of 50% isodose line). LVR was defined as < 3 discrete sites of PD in any number or location of organs. Pts with distant LVR were considered to have oligometastatic relapse. Ablative candidates were defined as pts with < 3 discrete sites of PD amenable to further RT or surgery. Cumulative incidence of PD was calculated with death as a competing risk. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the end of RT and assessed via Kaplan Meier. Multivariable Cox modeling was used to assess correlation of pt characteristics and time-to-event outcomes. Logistic regression was used to predict variables associated with LVR. RESULTS A total of 229 pts received CRT+ICI. Median follow up was 39 months and 119 pts experienced PD. Median PFS and OS were 18.4 and 34.5 months, respectively. Of pts with PD, 71 (60%) had DF, 28 (24%) had LRF+DF, and 20 (17%) had LRF. Of pts with any LRF, 28 (57%) had IFF, 10 (21%) had MF, and 10 (21%) had OOF. Estimated 1-year cumulative incidence of LRF, DF, and LRF+DF were 9.3% (95% CI 4.5-16), 39% (95% CI 31-48), and 19% (95% CI 12-27), respectively. A total of 63 (53%) pts had LVR. In pts with LVR, 19 (30%) had isolated thoracic relapse and 44 (69%) had oligometastatic relapse. Most oligometastatic disease was intracranial (22 metastases, 44%). Pts with LVR had a longer median OS vs pts with high volume relapse (37.4 vs 15.2 months, p<0.001). At time of PD, 56 (47%) pts were candidates for further ablative therapies. Subsequent anticancer therapies were local therapy alone (35%), local and systemic therapy (16%), systemic therapy alone (36%), or no therapy (13%). On multivariable analysis, LVR (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.21-0.73, p = 0.003) and longer receipt of ICI (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.95-0.98; p<0.001) were associated with improved survival while squamous histology (HR 2.26; 95% CI 1.18-4.32; p = 0.039) was associated with worse survival. Longer receipt of ICI was the only variable predictive for the development of LVR (OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.05; p = 0.004). CONCLUSION This is the largest real-world series reporting POF after CRT+ICI for stage III NSCLC. Approximately half of pts experience LVR and are candidates for further ablative therapy. Further data are needed to define optimal treatment strategies for pts with LVR after CRT+ICI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Friedes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - N Yegya-Raman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - M Iocolano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - S H Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - B Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - L Duan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - W P Levin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - K A Cengel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - L Sun
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - C Aggarwal
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - M E Marmarelis
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - A Doucette
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - R Cohen
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Y Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - C Langer
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - S J Feigenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yegya-Raman N, Friedes C, Sun L, Iocolano M, Kim KN, Doucette A, Cohen RB, Robinson KW, Levin WP, Cengel KA, Lally B, Agarwal M, D'Avella CA, Marmarelis ME, Kosteva JA, Singh AP, Ciunci CA, Aggarwal C, Berman AT, Langer CJ, Feigenberg SJ. Utilization and factors precluding receipt of checkpoint inhibitor consolidation for stage III NSCLC in a large U.S. academic health system. Clin Lung Cancer 2023:S1525-7304(23)00054-2. [PMID: 37076396 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2023.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We sought to determine the proportion of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who initiate consolidation durvalumab or other immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT), as well as reasons for nonreceipt and prognostic implications. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively identified consecutive patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC treated with definitive cCRT between October 2017 and December 2021 within a large US academic health system. Patients either received consolidation ICIs (ICI group) or did not (no-ICI group). Baseline characteristics and overall survival (OS) of the groups were assessed. Factors predictive of ICI nonreceipt were evaluated using logistic regression. RESULTS Of 333 patients who completed cCRT, 229 (69%) initiated consolidation ICIs; 104 (31%) did not. Reasons for ICI nonreceipt included progressive disease post-cCRT (N = 31, 9%), comorbidity or intercurrent illness (N = 25, 8%), cCRT toxicity (N = 23, 7%; 19/23 pneumonitis), and EGFR/ALK alteration (N = 14, 4%). The no-ICI group had worse performance status and a higher rate of baseline pulmonary comorbidity. Larger planning target volume was associated with post-cCRT progressive disease, and higher lung radiation dose with cCRT toxicity. Median OS was 16 months in the no-ICI group and 34.4 months in the ICI group. In the no-ICI group, OS was superior among those with EGFR/ALK alterations (median 44.5 months) and worst among those with progressive disease (median 5.9 months, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION 31% of patients who completed cCRT for stage III NSCLC did not receive consolidation ICIs. Survival amongst these patients is poor, especially for those with progressive disease post-cCRT.
Collapse
|
14
|
Lee SH, Kao GD, Feigenberg SJ, Dorsey JF, Frick MA, Jean-Baptiste S, Uche CZ, Cengel KA, Levin WP, Berman AT, Aggarwal C, Fan Y, Xiao Y. Multiblock Discriminant Analysis of Integrative 18F-FDG-PET/CT Radiomics for Predicting Circulating Tumor Cells in Early-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:1451-1465. [PMID: 33662459 PMCID: PMC8286285 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.02.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Revised: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The main objective of the present study was to integrate 18F-FDG-PET/CT radiomics with multiblock discriminant analysis for predicting circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). METHODS Fifty-six patients with stage I NSCLC treated with SBRT underwent 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging pre-SBRT and post-SBRT (median, 5 months; range, 3-10 months). CTCs were assessed via a telomerase-based assay before and within 3 months after SBRT and dichotomized at 5 and 1.3 CTCs/mL. Pre-SBRT, post-SBRT, and delta PET/CT radiomics features (n = 1548 × 3/1562 × 3) were extracted from gross tumor volume. Seven feature blocks were constructed including clinical parameters (n = 12). Multiblock data integration was performed using block sparse partial least squares-discriminant analysis (sPLS-DA) referred to as Data Integration Analysis for Biomarker Discovery Using Latent Components (DIABLO) for identifying key signatures by maximizing common information between different feature blocks while discriminating CTC levels. Optimal input blocks were identified using a pairwise combination method. DIABLO performance for predicting pre-SBRT and post-SBRT CTCs was evaluated using combined AUC (area under the curve, averaged across different blocks) analysis with 20 × 5-fold cross-validation (CV) and compared with that of concatenation-based sPLS-DA that consisted of combining all features into 1 block. CV prediction scores between 1 class versus the other were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS For predicting pre-SBRT CTCs, DIABLO achieved the best performance with combined pre-SBRT PET radiomics and clinical feature blocks, showing CV AUC of 0.875 (P = .009). For predicting post-SBRT CTCs, DIABLO achieved the best performance with combined post-SBRT CT and delta CT radiomics feature blocks, showing CV AUCs of 0.883 (P = .001). In contrast, all single-block sPLS-DA models could not attain CV AUCs higher than 0.7. CONCLUSIONS Multiblock integration with discriminant analysis of 18F-FDG-PET/CT radiomics has the potential for predicting pre-SBRT and post-SBRT CTCs. Radiomics and CTC analysis may complement and together help guide the subsequent management of patients with ES-NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Ho Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Gary D Kao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Steven J Feigenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jay F Dorsey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Melissa A Frick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Samuel Jean-Baptiste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Chibueze Z Uche
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Keith A Cengel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - William P Levin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Abigail T Berman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Charu Aggarwal
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Yong Fan
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ying Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lim TL, Pietrofesa RA, Arguiri E, Koumenis C, Feigenberg S, Simone CB, Rengan R, Cengel K, Levin WP, Christofidou-Solomidou M, Berman AT. Phase II Trial of Flaxseed to Prevent Acute Complications After Chemoradiation for Lung Cancer. J Altern Complement Med 2021; 27:824-831. [PMID: 34161146 DOI: 10.1089/acm.2020.0542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Thoracic radiotherapy is complicated by acute radiation-induced adverse events such as radiation pneumonitis (RP) and radiation esophagitis (RE). Based on preclinical work and a randomized pilot trial from our laboratory, this single-arm phase II trial investigated administering flaxseed as a radioprotector in patients receiving definitive chemoradiation for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Between June 2015 and February 2018, 33 patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with planned definitive chemoradiation were enrolled. Finely-ground Linum usitatissimum L. (Linaceae; flaxseed or linseed) in 40-g packets were provided for daily consumption in any patient-desired formulation 1 week before radiotherapy and throughout radiotherapy as tolerated. The primary outcomes were overall adverse events, with particular focus on Grade ≥3 RP, and flaxseed tolerability. Adverse events were graded according to CTCAE v4.0. Results: Of the 33 patients enrolled, 5 patients (15%) did not receive chemoradiation, 4 (12%) withdrew promptly after enrollment, 4 (12%) did not return a flaxseed consumption log, and 1 patient had irritable bowel syndrome (3%). The remaining 19 patients (57%) had chemoradiation and flaxseed ingestion with a mean completion and standard deviation of the intended flaxseed course of 62% ± 8.3%. Nine (50%) of these 19 patients reported difficulties with flaxseed consumption, citing nausea, constipation, odynophagia, or poor taste or texture. One patient (5%), with unverifiable flaxseed consumption, developed Grade 3 RP. There were no cases of Grade 2 RP. Six patients (32%) developed Grade 2 RE, but no patients developed Grade ≥3 RE. Median overall and progression-free survival were 31 and 12 months, respectively. Conclusions: Despite the low incidence of acute radiation-induced complications reported, significant treatment-related gastrointestinal toxicities and subsequently low flaxseed tolerability inhibit accurate determination of flaxseed effect in patients receiving concurrent thoracic chemoradiation. Thus, further investigations should focus on optimizing flaxseed formulation for improved tolerability and evaluation. CTR #: NCT02475330, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT02475330.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tristan L Lim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ralph A Pietrofesa
- Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Evguenia Arguiri
- Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Constantinos Koumenis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Steven Feigenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - C B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ramesh Rengan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Keith Cengel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - William P Levin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Melpo Christofidou-Solomidou
- Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Abigail T Berman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Reddy VK, Jain V, Venigalla S, Levin WP, Wilson RJ, Weber KL, Kalbasi A, Sebro RA, Shabason JE. Radiotherapy Remains Underused in the Treatment of Soft-Tissue Sarcomas: Disparities in Practice Patterns in the United States. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021; 19:295-306. [PMID: 33556919 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Practice patterns of radiation therapy (RT) use for soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) remain quite variable, despite clinical practice guidelines recommending the addition of RT to surgery for patients with high-grade STS, particularly for larger tumors. Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we assessed patterns of overall RT use, neoadjuvant versus adjuvant treatment, and specific RT modalities in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients aged ≥18 years with stage II/III STS in 2004 through 2015 were identified from the NCDB. Patterns of care were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Of 27,426 total patients, 11,654 (42%) were treated with surgery alone versus 15,772 (58%) with RT in addition to surgery, with no overall increase in RT use over the study period. Notable clinical predictors of receipt of RT included tumor size (>5 cm), grade III, and tumors arising in the extremities. Conversely, female sex, older age (≥70 years), Black race, noncommercial insurance coverage, farther distance to treatment, and poor performance status were negative predictors of RT use. Of those receiving RT, 27% were treated with neoadjuvant RT and 73% with adjuvant RT. The proportion of those receiving neoadjuvant RT increased over time. Relevant factors associated with neoadjuvant RT included treatment at academic centers, larger tumor size, and extremity tumors. Of those who received RT with a modality specified as either intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) or 3D conformal RT (3DCRT), 61% were treated with IMRT and 39% with 3DCRT. The proportion of patients treated with IMRT increased over time. Relevant factors associated with IMRT use included treatment at academic centers, commercial insurance coverage, and larger and nonextremity tumors. CONCLUSIONS Although use of neoadjuvant RT and IMRT has increased over time, a significant number of patients with STS are not receiving adjuvant or neoadjuvant RT. Our findings also note potential sociodemographic disparities and highlight the concern that not all patients with STS are being equally considered for RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Robert J Wilson
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kristy L Weber
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Anusha Kalbasi
- 3Department of Radiation Oncology, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ronnie A Sebro
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,4Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and.,5Department of Genetics and.,6Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Bioinformatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Barsky AR, Lin H, Mendes A, Dreyfuss A, Wright C, Anstadt EJ, Berman AT, Levin WP, Cengel KA, Anderson N, Dong L, Metz JM, Li T, Feigenberg S. Initial Clinical Experience Treating Patients With Lung Cancer on a 6MV-Flattening-Filter-Free O-Ring Linear Accelerator. Cureus 2020; 12:e10325. [PMID: 33052286 PMCID: PMC7546605 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.10325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Modern technologies, like intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), have improved the therapeutic ratio of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) for lung cancer (LC). Halcyon™ (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA), a novel 6MV-flattening-filter-free O-ring linear accelerator (6X-FFF ORL), was designed to deliver IMRT and VMAT with greater speed than a C-arm linac. Herein, we report our initial clinical experience treating patients with LC on this linac. Methods All patients who received TRT for LC on the 6X-FFF ORL at our institution were retrospectively identified. Patients' clinicopathologic data, radiotherapy details, early disease-control and toxicity outcomes, dosimetric data, couch corrections, and treatment times are reported. Results Between 10/2018-12/2019, 30 consecutive patients (median age 66 years, range 54-94 years) received definitive or post-operative TRT for LC (median 66 Gy/33 fractions; range 5-70 Gy/2-37 fractions) following four-dimensional computed tomography (CT) simulation (97%) using daily kilovoltage KV cone-beam CT (CBCT) (100%) on a 6X-FFF ORL for non-small cell LC (84%) or small cell LC (16%), with 53% receiving VMAT, 43% receiving static-field IMRT, and 77% receiving concurrent systemic therapy. All plans were approved through institutional peer review. The average three-dimensional vector couch correction based on CBCT guidance was 0.90 ± 0.50 cm. The average beam-on and beam on plus CBCT times were 1.7 ± 1.1 min, and 5.0 ± 3.2 min, respectively. Grade 3 dyspnea and fatigue occurred in 3% and 3% of patients, respectively. There were no grade ≥4 toxicities. Conclusion In this first clinical report of TRT for LC on a 6X-FFF ORL, daily CBCT-guided treatment was fast and safe with respect to dosimetry and clinical outcomes. Thus, use of this linac for TRT may increase LC patient throughput without a detriment in radiotherapy quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew R Barsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Hui Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Amberly Mendes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Alexandra Dreyfuss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Christopher Wright
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Emily J Anstadt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Abigail T Berman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - William P Levin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Keith A Cengel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Nathan Anderson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Lei Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - James M Metz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Taoran Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Steven Feigenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Baumann BC, Bernstein KDA, DeLaney TF, Simone CB, Kolker JD, Choy E, Levin WP, Weber KL, Muniappan A, Berman AT, Staddon A, Hartner L, Van Tine B, Hirbe A, Glatstein E, Hahn SM, Nagda SN, Chen YL. Multi-institutional analysis of stereotactic body radiotherapy for sarcoma pulmonary metastases: High rates of local control with favorable toxicity. J Surg Oncol 2020; 122:877-883. [PMID: 32588468 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Oligometastatic sarcoma pulmonary metastases (PM's) are traditionally treated with resection and/or chemotherapy. We hypothesize that stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an effective, safe alternative to surgery that can achieve excellent local control (LC) with a favorable toxicity profile. METHODS Patients treated with SBRT for sarcoma PM's from 2011 to 2016 at Massachusetts General Hospital and the University of Pennsylvania were included. Median dose was 50 Gy. Patients underwent computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography/CT Q3 months post-SBRT. RESULTS 44 patients with 56 separate PM's were treated with SBRT. Median age was 59 (range 19-82). 82% received prior chemotherapy, 66% had prior pulmonary resections (range, 1-5 resections), and 32% received prior thoracic radiotherapy. Median lesion size was 2.0 cm (range, 0.5-8.1 cm). Median follow-up was 16 months and 25 months for patients alive at last follow-up. Overall survival at 12 and 24 months was 74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67%-81%) and 46% (95% CI, 38%-55%). LC at 12 and 24 months was 96% (95% CI, 93%-98%) and 90% (95% CI, 84%-96%). LC and overall survival did not differ based on age, gender, histology, fractionation, lesion location, or size (P > .05). Three developed Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4 grade-2 chest-wall toxicities; one had grade-2 pneumonitis. CONCLUSIONS In the first multi-institutional series on SBRT for sarcoma PM's, SBRT has excellent LC and is well-tolerated. SBRT should be considered as an alternative/complement to resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian C Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Thomas F DeLaney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - James D Kolker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Edwin Choy
- Division of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - William P Levin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kristy L Weber
- Division of Orthopaedic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ashok Muniappan
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Abigail T Berman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Arthur Staddon
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Lee Hartner
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Brian Van Tine
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Angela Hirbe
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Eli Glatstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Stephen M Hahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Office of the Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration, Washington DC
| | - Suneel N Nagda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Yen-Lin Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Frick MA, Feigenberg SJ, Jean-Baptiste S, Aguarin L, Mendes A, Chinniah C, Swisher-McClure S, Berman AT, Levin WP, Cengel KA, Hahn SM, Dorsey JF, Simone CB, Kao GD. Circulating Tumor Cells Are Associated with Recurrent Disease in Patients with Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:2372-2380. [PMID: 31969332 PMCID: PMC9940939 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-2158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2019] [Revised: 10/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is effective in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), approximately 10%-15% of patients will fail regionally and 20%-25% distantly. We evaluate a novel circulating tumor cell (CTC) assay as a prognostic marker for increased risk of recurrence following SBRT. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Ninety-two subjects (median age, 71 years) with T1a (64%), T1b (23%), or T2a (13%) stage I NSCLC treated with SBRT were prospectively enrolled. CTCs were enumerated by utilizing a GFP-expressing adenoviral probe that detects elevated telomerase activity in cancer cells. Samples were obtained before, during, and serially up to 24 months after treatment. SBRT was delivered to a median dose of 50 Gy (range, 40-60 Gy), mostly commonly in four to five fractions (92%). RESULTS Thirty-eight of 92 subjects (41%) had a positive CTC test prior to SBRT. A cutoff of ≥5 CTCs/mL before treatment defined favorable (n = 78) and unfavorable (n = 14) prognostic groups. Increased risk of nodal (P = 0.04) and distant (P = 0.03) failure was observed in the unfavorable group. Within 3 months following SBRT, CTCs continued to be detected in 10 of 35 (29%) subjects. Persistent detection of CTCs was associated with increased risk of distant failure (P = 0.04) and trended toward increased regional (P = 0.08) and local failure (P = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS Higher pretreatment CTCs and persistence of CTCs posttreatment is significantly associated with increased risk of recurrence outside the targeted treatment site. This suggests that CTC analysis may potentially identify patients at higher risk for regional or distant recurrences and who may benefit from either systemic therapy and/or timely locoregional salvage treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa A. Frick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Louise Aguarin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Amberly Mendes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Chimbu Chinniah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Sam Swisher-McClure
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Abigail T. Berman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - William P. Levin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Keith A. Cengel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Stephen M. Hahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jay F. Dorsey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Charles B. Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, New York
| | - Gary D. Kao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kaimal G, Carroll-Haskins K, Mensinger JL, Dieterich-Hartwell R, Biondo J, Levin WP. Outcomes of Therapeutic Artmaking in Patients Undergoing Radiation Oncology Treatment: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study. Integr Cancer Ther 2020; 19:1534735420912835. [PMID: 32316856 PMCID: PMC7177989 DOI: 10.1177/1534735420912835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
A cancer diagnosis can be extremely stressful and life-altering for patients.
Chronically high levels of stress can increase inflammation and affect the
progression of the cancer. Psychosocial interventions could reduce stress and
address cancer patients’ emotional, psychological, and spiritual needs. This
mixed-methods pilot study compared 2 single-session arts-based approaches for
patients in active radiation treatment in a large urban hospital. Participants
were assigned to either the active control of independent coloring or the
therapeutic intervention of open studio art therapy. Participants completed
pre-session and post-session saliva samples and standardized psychosocial
measures of stress, affect, anxiety, self-efficacy, and creative agency. Both
conditions significantly increased participants’ positive affect, self-efficacy,
and creative agency, and decreased negative affect, perceived stress, and
anxiety. No changes of note were seen in the salivary measures. Participants’
narrative responses corroborated the quantitative findings and highlighted
additional benefits such as supporting meaning-making and spiritual insights.
Both arts-based interventions can support the emotional, psychological, and
spiritual needs of cancer patients while each has features that may be more
suited to the needs of certain patients. Further replication of these findings
could support our initial findings that suggest that patients could benefit from
having art studio spaces with art therapists and choices of art materials
available on the oncology unit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Girija Kaimal
- Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA,
USA
- Girija Kaimal, Department of Creative Arts
Therapies, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA-19102, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | - William P. Levin
- Hospital of the University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Grewal AS, Min EJ, Long Q, Grewal SK, Jain V, Levin WP, Cengel KA, Swisher-McClure S, Aggarwal C, Bauml JM, Singh A, Ciunci C, Cohen RB, Langer C, Feigenberg SJ, Berman AT. Early Tumor and Nodal Response in Patients with Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Predict for Oncologic Outcomes in Patients Treated with Concurrent Proton Therapy and Chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 106:358-368. [PMID: 31654783 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Revised: 09/04/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE There are no established imaging biomarkers that predict response during chemoradiation for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma. At our institution, proton therapy (PT) patients undergo repeat computed tomography (CT) simulations twice during radiation. We hypothesized that tumor regression measured on these scans would separate early and late responders and that early response would translate into better outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients underwent CT simulations before starting PT (CT0) and between weeks 1 to 3 (CT1) and weeks 4 to 7 (CT2) of PT. Primary tumor volume (TVR) and nodal volume (NVR) reduction were calculated at CT1 and CT2. Based on recursive partitioning analysis, early response at CT1 and CT2 was defined as ≥20% and ≥40%, respectively. Locoregional and overall progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival by response status were measured using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS Ninety-seven patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma underwent definitive PT to a median dose of 66.6 Gy with concurrent chemotherapy. Median TVR and NVR at CT1 were 19% (0-79%) and 19% (0-75%), respectively. At CT2, they were 33% (2-98%) and 35% (0-89%), respectively. With a median follow-up of 25 months, the median overall survival and PFS for the entire cohort was 24.9 and 13.2 months, respectively. Compared with patients with TVR and NVR <20% at T1 and <40% at T2, patients with TVR and NVR ≥20% at CT1 and ≥40% at CT2 had improved median locoregional PFS (27.15 vs 12.97 months for TVR ≥40% vs <40%, P < .01, and 25.67 vs 12.09 months for NVR ≥40% vs <40%, P < .01) and median PFS (22.7 vs 9.2 months, P < .01, and 20.3 vs 7.9 months, P < .01), confirmed on multivariate Cox regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS Significantly improved outcomes in patients with early responses to therapy, as measured by TVR and NVR, were seen. Further study is warranted to determine whether treatment intensification will improve outcomes in slow-responding patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amardeep S Grewal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Eun Jeong Min
- Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Qi Long
- Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sharonjit K Grewal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Varsha Jain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - William P Levin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Keith A Cengel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Samuel Swisher-McClure
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Charu Aggarwal
- Medical Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Joshua M Bauml
- Medical Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Aditi Singh
- Medical Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Christine Ciunci
- Medical Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Roger B Cohen
- Medical Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Corey Langer
- Medical Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Steven J Feigenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Abigail T Berman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Venigalla S, Nead KT, Sebro R, Guttmann DM, Sharma S, Simone CB, Levin WP, Wilson RJ, Weber KL, Shabason JE. Association Between Treatment at High-Volume Facilities and Improved Overall Survival in Soft Tissue Sarcomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 100:1004-1015. [PMID: 29485042 PMCID: PMC5830163 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.12.262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2017] [Revised: 12/06/2017] [Accepted: 12/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare malignancies that require complex multidisciplinary management. Therefore, facilities with high sarcoma case volume may demonstrate superior outcomes. We hypothesized that STS treatment at high-volume (HV) facilities would be associated with improved overall survival (OS). METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients aged ≥18 years with nonmetastatic STS treated with surgery and radiation therapy at a single facility from 2004 through 2013 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Facilities were dichotomized into HV and low-volume (LV) cohorts based on total case volume over the study period. OS was assessed using multivariable Cox regression with propensity score-matching. Patterns of care were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Of 9025 total patients, 1578 (17%) and 7447 (83%) were treated at HV and LV facilities, respectively. On multivariable analysis, high educational attainment, larger tumor size, higher grade, and negative surgical margins were statistically significantly associated with treatment at HV facilities; conversely, black race and non-metropolitan residence were negative predictors of treatment at HV facilities. On propensity score-matched multivariable analysis, treatment at HV facilities versus LV facilities was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.87, 95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.95; P = .001). Older age, lack of insurance, greater comorbidity, larger tumor size, higher tumor grade, and positive surgical margins were associated with statistically significantly worse OS. CONCLUSIONS In this observational cohort study using the National Cancer Database, receipt of surgery and radiation therapy at HV facilities was associated with improved OS in patients with STS. Potential sociodemographic disparities limit access to care at HV facilities for certain populations. Our findings highlight the importance of receipt of care at HV facilities for patients with STS and warrant further study into improving access to care at HV facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sriram Venigalla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Kevin T Nead
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ronnie Sebro
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - David M Guttmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sonam Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - William P Levin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Robert J Wilson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kristy L Weber
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jacob E Shabason
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Rwigema JCM, Verma V, Lin L, Berman AT, Levin WP, Evans TL, Aggarwal C, Rengan R, Langer C, Cohen RB, Simone CB. Prospective study of proton-beam radiation therapy for limited-stage small cell lung cancer. Cancer 2017; 123:4244-4251. [PMID: 28678434 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2017] [Revised: 05/09/2017] [Accepted: 05/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Existing data supporting the use of proton-beam therapy (PBT) for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) are limited to a single 6-patient case series. This is the first prospective study to evaluate clinical outcomes and toxicities of PBT for LS-SCLC. METHODS This study prospectively analyzed patients with primary, nonrecurrent LS-SCLC definitively treated with PBT and concurrent chemotherapy from 2011 to 2016. Clinical backup intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans were generated for each patient and were compared with PBT plans. Outcome measures included local control (LC), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) rates and toxicities. RESULTS Thirty consecutive patients were enrolled and evaluated. The median dose was 63.9 cobalt gray equivalents (range, 45-66.6 cobalt gray equivalents) in 33 to 37 fractions delivered daily (n = 18 [60.0%]) or twice daily (n = 12 [40.0%]). The concurrent chemotherapy was cisplatin/etoposide (n = 21 [70.0%]) or carboplatin/etoposide (n = 9 [30.0%]). In comparison with the backup IMRT plans, PBT allowed statistically significant reductions in the cord, heart, and lung mean doses and the volume receiving at least 5 Gy but not in the esophagus mean dose or the lung volume receiving at least 20 Gy. At a median follow-up of 14 months, the 1-/2-year LC and RFS rates were 85%/69% and 63%/42%, respectively. The median OS was 28.2 months, and the 1-/2-year OS rates were 72%/58%. There was 1 case each (3.3%) of grade 3 or higher esophagitis, pneumonitis, anorexia, and pericardial effusion. Grade 2 pneumonitis and esophagitis were seen in 10.0% and 43.3% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In the first prospective registry study and largest analysis to date of PBT for LS-SCLC, PBT was found to be safe with a limited incidence of high-grade toxicities. Cancer 2017;123:4244-4251. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Claude M Rwigema
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Liyong Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Abigail T Berman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - William P Levin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Tracey L Evans
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Charu Aggarwal
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ramesh Rengan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Corey Langer
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Roger B Cohen
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Remick JS, Schonewolf C, Gabriel P, Doucette A, Levin WP, Kucharczuk JC, Singhal S, Pechet TT, Rengan R, Simone CB, Berman AT. First Clinical Report of Proton Beam Therapy for Postoperative Radiotherapy for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 2017; 18:364-371. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2016.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2016] [Revised: 12/11/2016] [Accepted: 12/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
25
|
Ecker BL, Peters MG, McMillan MT, Sinnamon AJ, Zhang PJ, Fraker DL, Levin WP, Roses RE, Karakousis GC. Preoperative radiotherapy in the management of retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Br J Surg 2016; 103:1839-1846. [PMID: 27682864 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2016] [Revised: 06/15/2016] [Accepted: 07/05/2016] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Histological subtype influences both prognosis and patterns of treatment failure in retroperitoneal sarcoma. Previous studies on the efficacy of neoadjuvant radiotherapy (NRT) have incorporated multiple histological types with heterogeneous tumour biology. The survival impact of NRT specifically for patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma is poorly defined. METHODS Patients who underwent resection with curative intent for retroperitoneal liposarcoma and who received NRT or surgery alone were identified in the US National Cancer Data Base (2004-2013). Cox regression was used to identify co-variables associated with overall survival. NRT and surgery-alone cohorts were matched 1 : 1 by propensity scores based on the survival hazard on Cox modelling. Overall survival was compared by Kaplan-Meier estimates. RESULTS A total of 2082 patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma were identified; 1908 underwent surgery alone and 174 received NRT before surgical resection. Median tumour size was 22·0 cm and 34·9 per cent of tumours were high grade. In the unmatched cohort, NRT was not associated with improved overall survival (χ2 = 3·49, P = 0·062). In the propensity score-matched cohort, NRT was associated with an improvement in survival (median overall survival 129·2 versus 84·3 months; P = 0·046; hazard ratio (HR) 1·54, 95 per cent c.i. 1·01 to 2·36). This effect appeared most pronounced for tumours with adjacent organ invasion (median overall survival not reached versus 63·8 months; P = 0·044; HR 1·79, 1·01 to 3·19). CONCLUSION NRT improved survival in patients undergoing surgery for retroperitoneal liposarcoma, particularly those with high-risk pathological features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B L Ecker
- Departments of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - M G Peters
- Departments of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - M T McMillan
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - A J Sinnamon
- Departments of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - P J Zhang
- Departments of Pathology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - D L Fraker
- Departments of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - W P Levin
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - R E Roses
- Departments of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - G C Karakousis
- Departments of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Baumann BC, Nagda SN, Kolker JD, Levin WP, Weber KL, Berman AT, Staddon A, Hartner L, Hahn SM, Glatstein E, Simone CB. Efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy for the treatment of pulmonary metastases from sarcoma: A potential alternative to resection. J Surg Oncol 2016; 114:65-9. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.24268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2015] [Accepted: 04/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Brian C. Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Suneel N. Nagda
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - James D. Kolker
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - William P. Levin
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Kristy L. Weber
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology; University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Abigail T. Berman
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Arthur Staddon
- Department of Medical Oncology; University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Lee Hartner
- Department of Medical Oncology; University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Stephen M. Hahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology; MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Eli Glatstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Charles B. Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Vogel J, Berman AT, Lin L, Pechet TT, Levin WP, Gabriel P, Khella SL, Singhal S, Kucharczuk JK, Simone CB. Prospective study of proton beam radiation therapy for adjuvant and definitive treatment of thymoma and thymic carcinoma: Early response and toxicity assessment. Radiother Oncol 2016; 118:504-9. [PMID: 26895711 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2015] [Revised: 02/02/2016] [Accepted: 02/04/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Radiation is an important modality in treatment of thymic tumors. However, toxicity may reduce its overall benefit. We hypothesized that double-scattering proton beam therapy (DS-PT) can achieve excellent local control with limited toxicity in patients with thymic malignancies. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with thymoma or thymic carcinoma treated with DS-PT between 2011 and 2015 were prospectively analyzed for toxicity and patterns of failure on an IRB-approved study. RESULTS Twenty-seven consecutive patients were evaluated. Patients were a median of 56 years and had thymoma (85%). They were treated with definitive (22%), salvage (15%) or adjuvant (63%) DS-PT to a median of 61.2/1.8 Gy [CGE]. No patient experienced grade ⩾3 toxicity. Acute grade 2 toxicities included dermatitis (37%), fatigue (11%), esophagitis (7%), and pneumonitis (4%). Late grade 2 toxicity was limited to a single patient with chronic dyspnea. At a median follow-up of 2 years, 100% local control was achieved. Three-year regional control, distant control, and overall survival rates were 96% (95% CI 76-99%), 74% (95% CI 41-90%), and 94% (95% CI 63-99%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS This is the first cohort and prospective series of proton therapy to treat thymic tumors, demonstrating low rates of early toxicity and excellent initial outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Vogel
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, United States.
| | - Abigail T Berman
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, United States
| | - Liyong Lin
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, United States
| | - Taine T Pechet
- Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Philadelphia, United States
| | - William P Levin
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, United States
| | - Peter Gabriel
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, United States
| | - Sami L Khella
- Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Department of Neurology, Philadelphia, United States
| | - Sunil Singhal
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Philadelphia, United States
| | - John K Kucharczuk
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Philadelphia, United States
| | - Charles B Simone
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, United States
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Conventional radiation therapy directs photons (X-rays) and electrons at tumours with the intent of eradicating the neoplastic tissue while preserving adjacent normal tissue. Radiation-induced damage to healthy tissue and second malignancies are always a concern, however, when administering radiation. Proton beam radiotherapy, one form of charged particle therapy, allows for excellent dose distributions, with the added benefit of no exit dose. These characteristics make this form of radiotherapy an excellent choice for the treatment of tumours located next to critical structures such as the spinal cord, eyes, and brain, as well as for paediatric malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W P Levin
- Massachusetts General Hospital Northeast Proton Therapy Center, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - H Kooy
- Massachusetts General Hospital Northeast Proton Therapy Center, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - J S Loeffler
- Massachusetts General Hospital Northeast Proton Therapy Center, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - T F DeLaney
- Massachusetts General Hospital Northeast Proton Therapy Center, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Massachusetts General Hospital Northeast Proton Therapy Center, Boston, MA 02114, USA. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hsiung-Stripp DC, McDonough J, Masters HM, Levin WP, Hahn SM, Jones HA, Metz JM. Comparative treatment planning between proton and X-ray therapy in pancreatic cancer. Med Dosim 2002; 26:255-9. [PMID: 11704461 DOI: 10.1016/s0958-3947(01)00072-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
With the utilization of new biologic agents and experimental chemotherapy in the treatment of pancreatic cancer, the issue of local-regional control will become increasingly important. This study was undertaken to determine the feasibility of dose escalation using proton therapy, as compared to conventional 3-dimensional conformal radiation, by minimizing the dose to normal tissues. The photon treatment plans of 4 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer treated on a biologic therapy trial were utilized. Each patient was treated using a 3- or 4-field photon plan with 45 Gy to the clinical target volume (CTV), followed by a boost of 14.4 Gy to the gross target volume (GTV). Using a Helax treatment planning system, proton plans were generated to encompass the same CTV and GTV to the same prescribed dose. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were generated for the GTV, CTV, spinal cord, liver, and right and left kidneys. Each DVH was compared between the photon and proton plans. Proton plans utilized either a 2- or 3-field technique. Available energies included 130 or 180 MeV. Range modulators and bolus were used as needed to conform to the target volume. With the CTV and GTV receiving the same dose from the proton and photon plans, all individual proton plans were superior to the photon plans in reduction of normal tissue dose. For the 4 patients, the average dose reduction to 50% of the organ at risk was 78% to spinal cord (p = 0.003), 73% to left kidney (p = 0.025), 43% to right kidney (p = 0.059), and 55% to liver (p = 0.061). These comparative treatment plans show proton therapy results in significant reductions of dose to normal tissue compared to conventional photons while treating the same target volumes. This allows for the design of dose-escalation protocols using protons in combination with new biologic therapies and chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D C Hsiung-Stripp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|