Improved HIV-1 viral load determination based on reverse transcriptase activity recovered from human plasma

Sensitive Pathogen Detection and Drug Resistance Characterization Using Pathogen-Derived Enzyme Activity Amplified by LAMP or CRISPR-Cas

Pathogens encapsulate or encode their own suite of enzymes to facilitate replication in the host. The pathogen-derived enzymes possess specialized activities that are essential for pathogen replication and have naturally been candidates for drug targets. Phenotypic assays detecting the activities of pathogen-derived enzymes and characterizing their inhibition under drugs offer an opportunity for pathogen detection, drug resistance testing for individual patients, and as a research tool for new drug development. Here, we used HIV as an example to develop assays targeting the reverse transcriptase (RT) enzyme encapsulated in HIV for sensitive detection and phenotypic characterization, with the potential for point-of-care (POC) applications. Specifically, we targeted the complementary (cDNA) generation activity of the HIV RT enzyme by adding engineered RNA as substrates for HIV RT enzyme to generate cDNA products, followed by cDNA amplification and detection facilitated by loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) or CRISPR-Cas systems. To guide the assay design, we first used qPCR to characterize the cDNA generation activity of HIV RT enzyme. In the LAMP-mediated Product-Amplified RT activity assay (LamPART), the cDNA generation and LAMP amplification were combined into one pot with novel assay designs. When coupled with direct immunocapture of HIV RT enzyme for sample preparation and endpoint lateral flow assays for detection, LamPART detected as few as 20 copies of HIV RT enzyme spiked into 25μL plasma (fingerstick volume), equivalent to a single virion. In the Cas-mediated Product-Amplified RT activity assay (CasPART), we tailored the substrate design to achieve a LoD of 2e4 copies (1.67fM) of HIV RT enzyme. Furthermore, with its phenotypic characterization capability, CasPART was used to characterize the inhibition of HIV RT enzyme under antiretroviral drugs and differentiate between wild-type and mutant HIV RT enzyme for potential phenotypic drug resistance testing. Moreover, the CasPART assay can be readily adapted to target the activity of other pathogen-derived enzymes. As a proof-of-concept, we successfully adapted CasPART to detect HIV integrase with a sensitivity of 83nM. We anticipate the developed approach of detecting enzyme activity with product amplification has the potential for a wide range of pathogen detection and phenotypic characterization.

Appraisal of a Simple and Effective RT-qPCR Assay for Evaluating the Reverse Transcriptase Activity in Blood Samples from HIV-1 Patients

Testing HIV-1 RNA in plasma by PCR is universally accepted as the ultimate standard to confirm diagnosis of HIV-1 infection and to monitor viral load in patients under treatment. However, in some cases, this assay could either underestimate or overestimate the replication capacity of a circulating or latent virus. In the present study, we performed the assessment of evaluating the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) activity by means of a new assay for the functional screening of the status of HIV-1 patients. To this purpose, we utilized, for the first time on blood samples, an adapted version of a real-time RT quantitative PCR assay, utilized to evaluate the HIV-1-RT inhibitory activity of compounds. The study analyzed blood samples from 28 HIV-1-infected patients, exhibiting a wide range of viremia and immunological values. Results demonstrated that plasma HIV-1 RT levels, expressed as cycle threshold values obtained with the assay under appraisal, were inversely and highly significantly correlated with the plasma HIV-1-RNA levels of the patients. Thus, an HIV-1 RT quantitative PCR assay was created which we describe in this study, and it may be considered as a promising basis for an additional tool capable of furnishing information on the functional virological status of HIV-1-infected patients.

A highly sensitive aptamer-based HIV reverse transcriptase detection assay

Although many new assays for HIV have been developed, several labs still use simple and reliable radioactivity-based reverse transcriptase (RT) nucleotide incorporation assays for detection and quantification. We describe here a new assay for detection and quantitation of HIV RT activity that is based on a high affinity DNA aptamer to RT. The aptamer is sequestered on 96-well plates where it can bind to RT and other constituents can be removed by extensive washing. Since the aptamer mimics a primer-template, upon radiolabeled nucleotide addition, bound RT molecules can extend the aptamer and the radioactive signal can be detected by standard methods. In addition to being procedurally simple, the assay demonstrated high sensitivity (detection limits for RT and virions were ≤6400 molecules (∼4 × 10^-8 units) and ∼100-300 virions, respectively) and was essentially linear over a range of at least 10⁴. Both wild type and drug-resistant forms of HIV-1 RT were detectable as was HIV-2 RT, although there were some modest differences in sensitivity.

Assessment of the Cavidi ExaVir Load Assay for Monitoring Plasma Viral Load in HIV-2-Infected Patients

HIV plasma viral load is an established marker of disease progression and of response to antiretroviral therapy, but currently there is no commercial assay validated for the quantification of viral load in HIV-2-infected individuals. We sought to make the first clinical evaluation of Cavidi ExaVir Load (version 3) in HIV-2-infected patients. Samples were collected from a total of 102 individuals living in Cape Verde, and the HIV-2 viral load was quantified by both ExaVir Load and a reference in-house real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) used in Portugal in 91 samples. The associations between viral load and clinical prognostic variables (CD4⁺ T cell counts and antiretroviral therapy status) were similar for measurements obtained using ExaVir Load and qPCR. There was no difference between the two methods in the capacity to discriminate between nonquantifiable and quantifiable HIV-2 in the plasma. In samples with an HIV-2 viral load quantifiable by both methods (n = 27), the measurements were highly correlated (Pearson r = 0.908), but the ExaVir Load values were systematically higher relative to those determined by qPCR (median difference, 0.942 log₁₀ copies/ml). A regression model was derived that enables the conversion of ExaVir Load results to those that would have been obtained by the reference qPCR. In conclusion, ExaVir Load version 3 is a reliable commercial assay to measure viral load in HIV-2-infected patients and therefore a valuable alternative to the in-house assays in current use.

Can HIV reverse transcriptase activity assay be a low-cost alternative for viral load monitoring in resource-limited settings?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance and cost of an HIV reverse transcriptase-enzyme activity (HIV-RT) assay in comparison to an HIV-1 RNA assay for routine viral load monitoring in resource limited settings.

DESIGN

A cohort-based longitudinal study.

SETTING

Two antiretroviral therapy (ART) centres in Karnataka state, South India, providing treatment under the Indian AIDS control programme.

PARTICIPANTS

A cohort of 327 HIV-1-infected Indian adult patients initiating first-line ART.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Performance and cost of an HIV-RT assay (ExaVir Load V3) in comparison to a gold standard HIV-1 RNA assay (Abbott m2000rt) in a cohort of 327 Indian patients before (WK00) and 4 weeks (WK04) after initiation of first-line therapy.

RESULTS

Plasma viral load was determined by an HIV-1 RNA assay and an HIV-RT assay in 629 samples (302 paired samples and 25 single time point samples at WK00) obtained from 327 patients. Overall, a strong correlation of r=0.96 was observed, with good correlation at WK00 (r=0.84) and at WK04 (r=0.77). Bland-Altman analysis of all samples showed a good level of agreement with a mean difference (bias) of 0.22 log10copies/mL. The performance of ExaVir Load V3 was not negatively affected by a nevirapine/efavirenz based antiretroviral regimen. The per test cost of measuring plasma viral load by the Abbott m2000rt and ExaVir Load V3 assays in a basic lab setting was $36.4 and $16.8, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The strong correlation between the HIV-RT and HIV-1 RNA assays suggests that the HIV-RT assay can be an affordable alternative option for monitoring patients on antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN79261738.

Decreased phenotypic susceptibility to etravirine in patients with predicted genotypic sensitivity

Background

A sensitive, phenotypic reverse transcriptase (RT)-based drug susceptibility assay for the detection of etravirine (ETR) resistance in patient isolates was developed and compared with the results from direct sequencing and ultra-deep pyrosequencing (UDPS).

Methods

Samples were obtained from 15 patients with antiretroviral therapy (ART) failure and from five non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-naïve patients of whom four were infected by an NNRTI-resistant strain (transmitted drug resistance, TDR). In five patients, two consecutive samples (a and b) were taken for follow up of the virological response. HIV-1 RT was purified and drug susceptibility (IC₅₀) to ETR was estimated. Direct sequencing was performed in all samples and UDPS in samples from nine patients.

Results

Increased IC₅₀ to ETR was found in samples from 13 patients where direct sequencing predicted resistance in only four. UDPS identified additional (N = 11) NNRTI resistance associated mutations (RAMs) in six of nine tested patients. During early failure, IC₅₀ increases were observed in three of six patients without any ETR-RAMs detected by direct sequencing. In further two patients, who stopped NNRTI before sampling, increased IC₅₀ values were found shortly after, despite absence of ETR-RAMs. In two patients who had stopped NNRTI for >1 year, a concordance between phenotype and genotypes was found. Two patients with TDR had increased IC₅₀ despite no ETR-RAMs were detected by direct sequencing. UDPS revealed additional ETR-RAMs in four patients with a discrepancy between phenotype and direct sequencing.

Conclusions

The RT-based phenotypic assay showed decreased ETR susceptibility in patients where direct sequencing predicted ETR-sensitive virus. This increased phenotypic sensitivity was to a large extent supported by UDPS and treatment history. Our method could be valuable for further studies on the phenotypic kinetics of NNRTI resistance. The clinical relevance remains to be studied in larger patient-populations.

Micro- and nanotechnology for HIV/AIDS diagnostics in resource-limited settings

Thirty-four million people are living with HIV worldwide, a disproportionate number of whom live in resource-limited settings. Proper clinical management of AIDS, the disease caused by HIV, requires regular monitoring of both the status of the host's immune system and levels of the virus in their blood. Therefore, more accessible technologies capable of performing a CD4+ T cell count and HIV viral load measurement in settings where HIV is most prevalent are desperately needed to enable better treatment strategies and ultimately quell the spread of the virus within populations. This review discusses micro- and nanotechnology solutions to performing these key clinical measurements in resource-limited settings.

Mucocutaneous blood contact: blood release behavior of safety peripheral intravenous catheters

BACKGROUND

Protection against needlestick injuries has significantly improved in recent years thanks to so-called "safety devices." However, a potential drawback occasionally reported by users is a risk of blood splashing. If this blood comes in contact with the mucous membranes, it could lead to an infection.

METHODS

Five safety peripheral intravenous catheter brands were examined in a laboratory test. To simulate the extreme situations, which may arise through human use, the introducer needle was withdrawn from the catheter at 2 different angles whereby an industrial robot was used to simulate the sequence of this movement. Each brand was tested 30 times. The experiment was carried out using radioactively labeled human whole blood. The measurements for the transmitted volume of blood was taken both from an artificial head and from a surface measuring 18.5 cm by 26.5 cm at a height of 30 cm above the catheter; scintigraphy was used to take the measurements.

RESULTS

The volume of blood droplets potentially splashing into the mucous membranes was in the range of 1 nL.

CONCLUSION

For normal virus concentrations in the blood of sick patients, this dose is too small to cause hepatitis C and HIV.

Evaluation of etravirine resistance in clinical samples by a simple phenotypic test

Drug resistance testing is an important tool in the management of HIV-1 infection. As access to genotypic resistance assays is limited in low- and middle-income settings, alternatives are warranted. The aim of the study was to adapt a phenotypic drug susceptibility assay, ExaVir Drug, for detection of resistance to the second generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) etravirine (ETR). Five NNRTI resistant mutant forms of RT were produced (L100I, K103N, L100I/K103N, Y181C, V179D) in order to validate the assay for ETR. Furthermore, HIV-1 RT was purified from plasma samples (n = 28) obtained from treatment naïve and experienced HIV-1 infected patients, and ETR drug susceptibility (IC(50)) was estimated. The direct sequencing of the pol gene was performed. The recombinant RT mutants had the expected changes in drug sensitivity patterns. The RTs isolated from plasma of therapy naïve individuals showed low IC(50) for ETR. In the plasma virus from treatment experienced patients with Y181C, A98G, V108I, and/or K101E mutations in the pol gene, higher IC(50) values were found in line with reduced susceptibility data for ETR. This study demonstrates that ExaVir® Drug, a simple enzymatic phenotypic assay, can be used for detection of ETR resistance, including cross-resistance to other NNRTIs, in clinical samples. A further evaluation is needed to define clinical cut-offs; however the assay is an alternative to more costly HIV drug resistance tests, especially in low-income countries.

Performance characteristics of the Cavidi ExaVir viral load assay and the ultra-sensitive P24 assay relative to the Roche Monitor HIV-1 RNA assay

BACKGROUND

The Cavidi viral load assay and the ultra-sensitive p24 antigen assay (Up24 Ag) have been suggested as more feasible alternatives to PCR-based HIV viral load assays for use in monitoring patients infected with HIV-1 in resource-limited settings.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the performance of the Cavidi ExaVir Load™ assay (version 2.0) and two versions of the Up24 antigen assay and to characterize their agreement with the Roche Monitor HIV-1 RNA assay (version 1.5).

STUDY DESIGN

Observational study using a convenience sample of 342 plasma specimens from 108 patients enrolled in two ACTG clinical trials to evaluate the performance characteristics of the Up24 Ag assay using two different lysis buffers and the Cavidi ExaVir Load™ assay.

RESULTS

In analysis of agreement with the Roche assay, the Cavidi assay demonstrated superiority to the Up24 Ag assays in accuracy and precision, as well as sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for HIV-1 RNA ≥ 400, ≥ 1000 and ≥ 5000 copies/mL. Logistic performance curves indicated that the Cavidi assay was superior to the Up24 assays for viral loads greater than 650 copies/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that the Cavidi ExaVir Load assay could be used for monitoring HIV-1 viral load in resource-limited settings.

Assessment of the low-cost Cavidi ExaVir Load assay for monitoring HIV viral load in pediatric and adult patients

BACKGROUND

Viral load (VL) is a critical marker for monitoring HIV disease progression and response to antiretroviral therapy. In resource-constrained settings, there is a need for a simple and inexpensive assay to monitor infected adults and children.

METHODS

We compared versions 2 and 3 of the ExaVir Load assay, Cavidi AB (HIV RT) with the Roche, COBAS Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor assay (HIV RNA) for quantifying HIV VL.

RESULTS

The HIV RT version 2 assay showed good sensitivity with detection in 94% of samples with HIV RNA >1000 copies per milliliter. Adult samples were tested using HIV RT version 2 (n = 35) and version 3 (n = 23) assays with plasma volumes of 1 mL (recommended), 0.5 mL and 0.25 mL in comparison with HIV RNA. The HIV RT and HIV RNA assay results were comparable when tested using different volumes. Comparison of results from pediatric samples (n = 27), tested using 1 mL and a smaller volume by HIV RT version 2 were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

The HIV RT assay was comparable to the HIV RNA assay with sensitivity approaching that of HIV RNA. Smaller volumes than the recommended 1 mL can be used, improving utility of this assay for pediatric monitoring.

HIV-1 viral load and phenotypic antiretroviral drug resistance assays based on reverse transcriptase activity in comparison to amplification based HIV-1 RNA and genotypic assays

BACKGROUND

Amplification based HIV-1 viral load and genotypic resistance assays are expensive, technologically complex and may be difficult to implement in resource limited settings. Inexpensive, simpler assays are urgently needed.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the suitability of the ExaVir Load and ExaVir Drug assays for use in patient monitoring.

STUDY DESIGN

Specimens from 108 adults were used to compare ExaVir Load HIV-1 RT to Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor HIV-1 RNA, and ExaVir Drug phenotype to HIV GenoSure genotype.

RESULTS

HIV-1 RT and HIV-1 RNA levels were comparable (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.83). Most (94%) had detectable results in both assays. The mean difference (HIV-1 RT minus HIV-1 RNA) was -0.21 log(10)cps/mLequiv. Relationship between HIV-1 RT and HIV-1 RNA was not affected by RT mutations, CD4 cell count, or efavirenz (EFV) or nevirapine (NVP) use. Phenotypes were generally consistent with genotype findings for EFV, but not for NVP. Most patients (93.9%) with phenotypic EFV resistance had at least one EFV mutation, while 78.0% of patients with phenotypic NVP resistance had at least one NVP mutation. Eleven of 49 samples tested for EFV susceptibility were found resistant (n=2) or with reduced susceptibility (n=9) despite the absence of genotypic resistance. Eleven of 45 samples tested for NVP susceptibility were found resistant (n=9) or with reduced susceptibility (n=2) with no evidence of genotypic mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

The ExaVir Load assay performed well and may be an alternative to amplification based techniques for HIV-1 RNA quantification. The ExaVir Drug assay for phenotypic resistance testing requires further evaluation, especially for NVP.

Comparative evaluation of the ExaVir Load version 3 reverse transcriptase assay for measurement of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 plasma load

In resource-limited settings, the virological monitoring of antiretroviral therapy is limited by high cost and the lack of infrastructure. The Cavidi ExaVir Load assay employs a simple and inexpensive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay format to measure human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) reverse transcriptase activity, which correlates with plasma RNA load. The version 3 assay has been described as having improved precision and sensitivity. There are limited data on its performance relative to those of current real-time assays. Our objective was to compare HIV type 1 (HIV-1) RNA load measurement in plasma by ExaVir Load version 3 (designated ExaVir), Abbott M2000sp/M2000rt RealTime HIV-1 assay (designated RealTime), and Roche COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 version 1 assay (designated TaqMan). Plasma from 119 patients (34 with subtype B infection, 85 with non-subtype B infection [A-H, CRF01, CRF02, CRF06, CRF12, CRF14, and complex]; 48 subjects were treatment experienced, 71 were naive) and serial dilutions of the second international standard (IS) were tested. Assay relationship and agreement were determined by linear regression, correlation analysis, and the Bland-Altman method. The ExaVir assay quantified 77/83 (92.8%) samples with viral loads of >2.3 log10 copies/ml by the molecular assays. Results were linearly associated and strongly correlated with RealTime and TaqMan measurements (R of 0.94 and 0.92, respectively) for both subtype B (R of 0.97 and 0.95, respectively) and non-subtype B (R of 0.93 and 0.91, respectively) samples. Mean differences were 0.28 and 0.18 log10 copies/ml in favor of the two molecular assays; 7/119 (5.9%) and 5/119 (4.2%) samples were outside the 95% level of agreement. ExaVir underquantified the IS by a mean of 0.2 (range, 0.0 to 0.5) log10 copies/ml. The ExaVir assay showed excellent concordance with real-time molecular assays, offering a suitable option for virological monitoring in settings with limited infrastructure.

Evaluation of the Cavidi ExaVir Load assay (version 3) for plasma human immunodeficiency virus type 1 load monitoring

We evaluated the new low-cost ExaVir Load (version 3) reverse transcriptase viral load assay against the Roche Cobas Amplicor assay. Results for samples tested using the reverse transcriptase assay correlated well with those obtained with the Roche assay (r = 0.85; n = 202). The version 3 reverse transcriptase assay shows improved sensitivity compared to the previous version.

Evaluation of the Abbott m2000 RealTime human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) assay for HIV load monitoring in South Africa compared to the Roche Cobas AmpliPrep-Cobas Amplicor, Roche Cobas AmpliPrep-Cobas TaqMan HIV-1, and BioMerieux NucliSENS EasyQ HIV-1 assays

The implementation of antiretroviral therapy demands the need for increased access to viral load (VL) monitoring. Newer real-time VL testing technologies are faster and have larger dynamic ranges and fully automated extraction to benefit higher throughputs in resource-poor environments. The Abbott RealTime human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) assay was evaluated as a new option for testing for HIV-1 subtype C in South Africa, and its performance was compared to the performance of existing assays (the Cobas AmpliPrep-Cobas TaqMan HIV-1, version 1, assay; the AmpliPrep-Cobas Monitor standard HIV-1 assay; and the NucliSENS EasyQ-EasyMag HIV-1 assay) in a high-throughput laboratory. The total precision of the RealTime HIV-1 assay was acceptable over all viral load ranges. This assay compared most favorably with the Cobas AmpliPrep-Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 assay (R(2) = 0.904), with a low standard deviation of difference being detected (0.323 copies/ml). The bias against comparator assays ranged from -0.001 copies/ml to -0.228 copies/ml. Variability in the reporting of VLs for a 20-member subtype panel compared to the variability of other assays was noted with subtypes G and CRF02-AG. The RealTime HIV-1 assay can test 93 samples per day with minimal manual preparation, less staff, and the minimization of contamination through automation. This assay is suitable for HIV-1 subtype C VL quantification in South Africa.

Quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 viral load in plasma using reverse transcriptase activity assay at a district hospital laboratory in Botswana: a decentralization pilot study

Roche COBAS Amplicor monitor version 1.5 assay is considered gold standard for viral load monitoring in Botswana. Due to its demand for elaborate infrastructure, viral load testing has been confined to the national HIV reference laboratories. Cavidi ExaVir Load version 2 assay was considered as a potential alternative to decentralize viral load testing to the rural/remote hospital laboratories and thus increase access to therapy. This study compared the performance of ExaVir Load v2 assay at a district hospital laboratory in Serowe and COBAS Amplicor monitor v1.5 assay at the Botswana Harvard HIV Reference Laboratory using quality assessment samples and plasma from HIV-positive individuals. ExaVir Load v2 and COBAS Amplicor monitor v1.5 assays had very good agreement; Kappa statistic 0.951. The COBAS Amplicor monitor v1.5 and ExaVir Load v2 assays detected HIV-1 RNA in 84 and 86 samples but did not detect HIV-1 RNA in 221 and 219 samples, respectively. The two assays detected HIV-1 RNA concordantly in 82 samples and were strongly correlated (r=0.8554, P<0.0001). ExaVir Load v2 assay provided a simple and reliable alternative viral load system that is adaptable to district hospital laboratories. The cost per test is less than RT-PCR. The ExaVir Load v2 systems have since been placed in four more district and primary hospital laboratories.

In-house HIV-1 RNA real-time RT-PCR assays: principle, available tests and usefulness in developing countries

The principle of currently available licensed HIV-1 RNA assays is based on real-time technologies that continuously monitor the fluorescence emitted by the amplification products. Besides these assays, in-house quantitative (q) real-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR (RT-qPCR) tests have been developed and evaluated particularly in developing countries, for two main reasons. First, affordable and generalized access to HIV-1 RNA viral load is urgently needed in the context of expected universal access to prevention and antiretroviral treatment programs in these settings. Second, since many non-B subtypes, circulating recombinant forms and unique recombinant forms circulate in these areas, in-house HIV-1 RNA RT-qPCR assays are ideal academic tools to thoroughly evaluate the impact of HIV-1 genetic diversity on the accuracy of HIV-1 RNA quantification, as compared with licensed techniques. To date, at least 15 distinct in-house assays have been designed. They differ by their chemistry and the HIV-1 target sequence (located in gag, Pol-IN or LTR gene). Analytical performances of the tests that have been extensively evaluated appear at least as good as (or even better than) those of approved assays, with regard to HIV-1 strain diversity. Their clinical usefulness has been clearly demonstrated for early diagnosis of pediatric HIV-1 infection and monitoring of highly active antiretroviral therapy efficacy. The LTR-based HIV-1 RNA RT-qPCR assay has been evaluated by several groups under the auspices of the Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA et les hépatites virales B et C. It exists now as a complete standardized commercial test.

Evaluation of two commercially available alternatives for HIV-1 viral load testing in resource-limited settings

There is an urgent need for low-cost assays for HIV-1 quantitation to ensure adequate follow-up of HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) in resource-limited countries. Two low-cost viral load assays are evaluated, a reverse transcriptase activity assay (ExavirLoad v2, Cavidi) and a real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assay (Generic HIV viral load, Biocentric). Both tests were compared with the ultrasensitive HIV Amplicor Monitor assay. Samples were collected in Mombasa, Kenya, from 20 HIV-1 seronegative and 150 HIV-1 seropositive individuals of whom 50 received antiretroviral treatment (ART). The ExavirLoad and the Generic HIV viral load assay were performed in a local laboratory in Mombasa, the Amplicor Monitor assay (version 1.5, Roche Diagnostics) was performed in Ghent, Belgium. ExavirLoad and Generic HIV viral load reached a sensitivity of 98.3% and 100% and a specificity of 80.0% and 90.0%, respectively. Linear regression analyses revealed good correlations between the Amplicor Monitor and the Generic HIV viral load (r=0.935, p<0.001) with high accuracy (100.1%), good precision (5.5%) and a low percent similarity coefficient of variation (5.4%). Bland-Altman analysis found 95% of the samples within clinically acceptable limits of agreement (-1.19 to 0.87logcopies/ml). Although, the ExavirLoad also showed a good linear correlation with the Amplicor Monitor (r=0.901, p<0.001), a problem with false positive results was more significant. The cost per test remains relatively high (US$ 30 for ExavirLoad and US$ 20 for the Generic HIV viral load). Hence, false positive results and the need for an expensive PCR instrument for the Generic HIV viral load assays still limit the implementation of these tests in less equipped, less experienced laboratories.

Evidence of retroviral etiology for disseminated neoplasia in cockles (Cerastoderma edule)

Epizootiologic outbreaks of disseminated neoplasia have been reported in association with massive mortalities of various bivalve species. In cockles, Cerastoderma edule, this pathological condition was described in Ireland and France. Since 1997, different populations affected by this pathology have been detected in Galicia (NW Spain). Transmission electron microscopy allowed the visualization of virus-like particles in neoplastic cells, resembling a retrovirus-like agent. To confirm this hypothesis, we used a commercial kit for detection and quantification of reverse transcriptase (RT) activity, based on the use of bromo-deoxyuridine triphosphate (BrdUTP) and a BrdU binding antibody conjugated to alkaline phosphatase. In addition, we developed a product-enhanced RT assay using RNA of hepatitis A virus as a template. These two assays showed positive RT activity in 90.9 and 81.8% of samples, respectively, from cockles displaying disseminated neoplasia as determined by light microscopy. These results strongly support the hypothesis of retroviral etiology for this pathological condition.

HIV-1 load quantitation: a 17-year perspective

During the past decade and a half, quantitation of plasma-associated human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA level, or HIV-1 load, has been validated in clinical practice and clinical trials as an important surrogate marker of HIV-1 disease progression and of the potency and durability of antiretroviral regimens. This review highlights some of the history, accomplishments, and impact of Tom Merigan's laboratory on the use of HIV-1 load as a marker, as well as on updating technologies for determining HIV-1 load, their performance, interpretation of the results, and their use in clinical practice.

HIV-1 viral load assays for resource-limited settings

The authors discuss studies on the low-cost viral load assays that are currently available and their potential for use in resource-limited settings.

Reverse transcriptase viral load correlates with RNA in SIV/SHIV-infected macaques

Monitoring of viral load in macaques has usually been carried out using in-house PCR-based methods. A novel viral load (VL) kit (ExaVir Load) based on the measurement of lentivirus reverse transcriptase (RT) activity provides a potential alternative to methods that measure plasma viral RNA. RT is a fundamental and conserved activity of all retroviruses and the method should theoretically detect RT from all lentiviruses. To test this we compared VL measured by a commercially available RT kit with an in-house QC RT-PCR in macaques infected with SIV and SHIV. Both RT and RNA levels were measured over time in both sets of macaques. Results indicated that the relationship between both tests was strong for SIV and SHIV (r = 0.95 and r = 0.92, p < 0.0001, respectively). The VL trends also followed each other, indicating that both techniques measured the same process of viral replication. Furthermore, the RT load obtained using standardized control plasma samples supplied by NIBSC gave values close to the designated VL. However, when comparing RT load with QC RT-PCR a consistently three to five time higher level was obtained with the RT assay, highlighting potential differences in assay calibration. Even so, the data suggest that the RT assay is both sensitive and robust for use in the SIV/SHIV macaque model, particularly where molecular-based assays for SIV VL determinations are not easily available. The assay is also a commercially available kit and hence has the potential to reduce the variability seen between laboratories using in-house PCR.

Reverse transcriptase activity for quantitation of HIV-1 subtype C in plasma: relation to RNA copy number and CD4 T-cell count

The present study monitored the changes in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) viral load using a reverse transcriptase (RT) assay and an HIV-1 RNA based assay, and relates these data to the dynamics of CD4 cell counts. The samples examined originate from a prospective study of HIV-1 subtype C infected, untreated Ethiopians followed twice yearly over a period of up to 5 years. The ExaVir Load test, version 1, was used for isolation and quantitation of HIV-1 RT in plasma. The RT activities recovered were compared to the HIV-1 RNA copy numbers, which had been determined previously by the NucliSens HIV-1 QT Test. There was a significant correlation between the data obtained in the two tests (r = 0.65, P < 0.0001). During follow-up, the median RT and RNA levels increased more or less in parallel up to approximately four times the values at admittance. CD4 cell counts, which had also been determined previously, decreased slowly but continuously from approximately 310 to 190 CD4 cells/ml. In the majority of individual patients, there was an inverse correlation between CD4 T-cell counts and RT activity, and with the RNA copy number, and the data obtained by either test could be used to predict CD4 T-cell counts. The ExaVir Load test thus provides data equivalent to the estimation of the number of HIV-1 RNA copies for the prediction of CD4 T-cell counts. It is based on a simple technique, can be run in any routine diagnostic laboratory, and is a competitive alternative for use in resource limited settings.

Comparison of two human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA surrogate assays to the standard HIV RNA assay

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA testing is the gold standard for monitoring antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients. However, equipment and reagent costs preclude widespread use of the assay in resource-limited settings. The Perkin-Elmer Ultrasensitive p24 assay and the Cavidi Exavir Load assay both offer potentially simpler, less costly technologies for monitoring viral load. These assays were compared to the Roche Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor Test, v1.5, using panels of clinical samples (subtype B) from HIV-positive subjects and HIV-spiked samples (subtypes A, C, D, CRF_01AE, CRF_02AG, and F). The Ultrasensitive p24 assay detected 100% of the spiked samples with virus loads of >250,000 copies/ml and 61% of the clinical samples with virus loads of 219 to 288,850 copies/ml. Detection rates were improved substantially if an external lysis buffer was added to the procedure. The Cavidi assay detected 54 to 100% of spiked samples with virus loads >10,000 copies/ml and 68% of the clinical samples. These detection rates were also greatly improved with a newly implemented version of this kit. Coefficients of variation demonstrate good reproducibility for each of these kits. The results from the Cavidi v1.0, Cavidi v2.0, and Perkin-Elmer, and the Perkin-Elmer Plus external buffers all correlated well with the results from the Roche Monitor Test (r = 0.83 to 0.96, r = 0.84 to 0.99, r = 0.58 to 0.67, and r = 0.59 to 0.95, respectively). Thus, the use of these two assays for monitoring patients, together with less-frequent confirmation testing, offers a feasible alternative to frequent HIV RNA testing in resource-limited settings.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) reverse transcriptase activity correlates with HIV RNA load: implications for resource-limited settings

Measurement of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) plasma RNA levels using Roche AMPLICOR version 1.5 (HIV RNA) is an integral part of monitoring HIV-infected patients in industrialized countries. These assays are currently unaffordable in resource-limited settings. We investigated a reverse transcriptase (RT) assay as a less expensive alternative for measuring viral burden that quantifies RT enzyme activity in clinical plasma samples. A comparison of RT and HIV RNA assays was performed on 29 paired plasma samples from patients living in the United States and 21 paired plasma samples from patients living in Cameroon. RT levels correlated significantly with plasma HIV RNA viral loads in plasma from U.S. patients (r = 0.898; P < 0.001) and Cameroonian patients, a majority of whom were infected with HIV-1 clade type CRF02_AG (r = 0.669; P < 0.01). Among 32 samples with HIV viral load of >2,000 copies/ml, 97% had detectable RT activity. One Cameroon sample had undetectable RNA viral load but detectable RT activity of 3 fg/ml. The RT assay is a simple and less expensive alternative to the HIV RNA assay. Field studies comparing these assays in resource-limited settings are warranted to assess the practicality and usefulness of this assay for monitoring HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy.