Cyclin D1 and p21 is elevated in the giant cells of giant cell tumors

Giant Cells of Various Lesions Are Characterised by Different Expression Patterns of HLA-Molecules and Molecules Involved in the Cell Cycle, Bone Metabolism, and Lineage Affiliation: An Immunohistochemical Study with a Review of the Literature

Giant cells (GCs) are thought to originate from the fusion of monocytic lineage cells and arise amid multiple backgrounds. To compare GCs of different origins, we immunohistochemically characterised the GCs of reactive and neoplastic lesions (n = 47). We studied the expression of 15 molecules including HLA class II molecules those relevant to the cell cycle, bone metabolism and lineage affiliation. HLA-DR was detectable in the GCs of sarcoidosis, sarcoid-like lesions, tuberculosis, and foreign body granuloma. Cyclin D1 was expressed by the GCs of neoplastic lesions as well as the GCs of bony callus, fibroid epulis, and brown tumours. While cyclin E was detected in the GCs of all lesions, p16 and p21 showed a heterogeneous expression pattern. RANK was expressed by the GCs of all lesions except sarcoid-like lesions and xanthogranuloma. All GCs were RANK-L-negative, and the GCs of all lesions were osteoprotegerin-positive. Osteonectin was limited to the GCs of chondroblastoma. Osteopontin and TRAP were detected in the GCs of all lesions except xanthogranuloma. RUNX2 was heterogeneously expressed in the reactive and neoplastic cohort. The GCs of all lesions except foreign body granuloma expressed CD68, and all GCs were CD163- and langerin-negative. This profiling points to a functional diversity of GCs despite their similar morphology.

Epigenetic lockdown of CDKN1A (p21) and CDKN2A (p16) characterises the neoplastic spindle cell component of giant cell tumours of bone

Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) comprises the eponymous osteoclastic multinucleated giant cells eliciting bone lysis, a H3F3A-mutated neoplastic mononucleated fibroblast-like cell population and H3F3A-wild type mononucleated stromal cells. In this study, we characterised four new cell lines from GCTB. Furthermore, we compared the genome-wide DNA methylation profile of 13 such tumours and three further cell lines with giant cell rich lesions comprising three H3F3B-mutated chondroblastomas, three USP6-rearranged aneurysmal bone cysts, three non-ossifying fibromas, two hyperparathyroidism-associated brown tumours as well as mesenchymal stem cells, osteoblasts, and osteoclasts. In an unsupervised analysis, we delineated GCTB and chondroblastomas from the other analysed tumour entities. Using comparative methylation analysis, we demonstrated that the methylation pattern of the cell lines approximately equals that of H3F3A-mutated stromal cells in tissue. These patterns more resemble that of osteoblasts than that of mesenchymal stem cells, which argues for the osteoblast as the cell of origin of giant cell tumours of bone. Using enrichment analysis, we detected distinct hypermethylated clusters containing histone and collagen genes as well as target genes of the tumour suppressor p53. We found that the promotor regions of CDKN1A, CDKN2A and IGFBP3 are methylated more strongly in GCTB than in the other giant cell containing lesions, mesenchymal stem cells, osteoblasts, and osteoclasts (p<0.001). This hypermethylation correlates with the lower gene expression at the mRNA level for these three genes in the cell lines, the lack of p16 and p21 in these cell lines and the lower expression of p16 and p21 in GCTB. Overall, our analysis reveals characteristic DNA methylation patterns of giant cell tumours of bone and chondroblastomas and shows that cell lines of giant cell tumours of bone are a valid model for further analysis of H3F3A-mutated tumour cells. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Cell Cycle Regulatory Protein Expression in Multinucleated Giant Cells of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: do They Proliferate?

Cells of the monocyte macrophage lineage form multinucleated giant cells (GCs) by fusion, which may express some cell cycle markers. By using a comprehensive marker set, here we looked for potential replication activities in GCs, and investigated whether these have diagnostic or clinical relevance in giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB). GC rich regions of 10 primary and 10 first recurrence GCTB cases were tested using immunohistochemistry in tissue microarrays. The nuclear positivity rate of the general proliferation marker, replication licensing, G1/S-phase, S/G2/M-phase, mitosis promoter, and cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor reactions was analyzed in GCs. Concerning Ki67, moderate SP6 reaction was seen in many GC nuclei, while B56 and Mib1 positivity was rare, but the latter could be linked to more aggressive (p = 0.012) phenotype. Regular MCM6 reaction, as opposed to uncommon MCM2, suggested an initial DNA unwinding. Early replication course in GCs was also supported by widely detecting CDK4 and cyclin E, for the first time, and confirming cyclin D1 upregulation. However, post-G1-phase markers CDK2, cyclin A, geminin, topoisomerase-2a, aurora kinase A, and phospho-histone H3 were rare or missing. These were likely silenced by upregulated CDK inhibitors p15^INK4b, p16^INK4a, p27^KIP1, p53 through its effector p21^WAF1 and possibly cyclin G1, consistent with the prevention of DNA replication. In conclusion, the upregulation of known and several novel cell cycle progression markers detected here clearly verify early replication activities in GCs, which are controlled by cell cycle arresting CDK inhibitors at G1 phase, and support the functional maturation of GCs in GCTB.

In situ cell cycle analysis in giant cell tumor of bone reveals patients with elevated risk of reduced progression-free survival

OBJECTIVE

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a frequently recurring locally aggressive osteolytic lesion, where pathological osteoclastogenesis and bone destruction are driven by neoplastic stromal cells. Here, we studied if cell cycle fractions within the mononuclear cell compartment of GCTB can predict its progression-free survival (PFS).

METHODS

154 cases (100 primaries and 54 recurrent) from 139 patients of 40 progression events, was studied using tissue microarrays. Ploidy and in situ cell cycle progression related proteins including Ki67 and those linked with replication licensing (mcm2), G1-phase (cyclin D1, Cdk4), and S-G2-M-phase (cyclin A; Cdk2) fractions; cell cycle control (p21^waf1) and repression (geminin), were tested. The Prentice-Williams-Peterson (PWP) gap-time models with the Akaike information criterion (AIC) were used for PFS analysis.

RESULTS

Cluster analysis showed good correlation between functionally related marker positive cell fractions indicating no major cell cycle arrested cell populations in GCTB. Increasing hazard of progression was statistically associated with the elevated post-G1/S-phase cell fractions. Univariate analysis revealed significant negative association of poly-/aneuploidy (p < 0.0001), and elevated cyclin A (p < 0.001), geminin (p = 0.015), mcm2 (p = 0.016), cyclin D1 (p = 0.022) and Ki67 (B56: p = 0.0543; and Mib1: p = 0.0564 -strong trend) positive cell fractions with PFS. The highest-ranked multivariate interaction model (AIC = 269.5) also included ploidy (HR 5.68, 95%CI: 2.62-12.31, p < 0.0001), mcm2 (p = 0.609), cyclin D1 (HR 1.89, 95%CI: 0.88-4.09, p = 0.105) and cyclin A (p < 0.0001). The first and second best prognostic models without interaction (AIC = 271.6) and the sensitivity analysis (AIC = 265.7) further confirmed the prognostic relevance of combining these markers.

CONCLUSION

Ploidy and elevated replication licensing (mcm2), G1-phase (cyclin D1) and post-G1 phase (cyclin A) marker positive cell fractions, indicating enhanced cell cycle progression, can assist in identifying GCTB patients with increased risk for a reduced PFS.

GTSE1 is involved in breast cancer progression in p53 mutation-dependent manner

Background

With the rapid development of the high throughput detection techniques, tumor-related Omics data has become an important source for studying the mechanism of tumor progression including breast cancer, one of the major malignancies worldwide. A previous study has shown that the G2 and S phase-expressed-1 (GTSE1) can act as an oncogene in several human cancers. However, its functional roles in breast cancer remain elusive.

Method

In this study, we analyzed breast cancer data downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) databases and other online database including the Oncomine, bc-GenExMiner and PROGgeneV2 database to identify the molecules contributing to the progression of breast cancer. The GTSE1 expression levels were investigated using qRT-PCR, immunoblotting and IHC. The biological function of GTSE1 in the growth, migration and invasion of breast cancer was examined in MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468 and MCF7 cell lines. The in vitro cell proliferative, migratory and invasive abilities were evaluated by MTS, colony formation and transwell assay, respectively. The role of GTSE1 in the growth and metastasis of breast cancer were revealed by in vivo investigation using BALB/c nude mice.

Results

We showed that the expression level of GTSE1 was upregulated in breast cancer specimens and cell lines, especially in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and p53 mutated breast cancer cell lines. Importantly, high GTSE1 expression was positively correlated with histological grade and poor survival. We demonstrated that GTSE1 could promote breast cancer cell growth by activating the AKT pathway and enhance metastasis by regulating the Epithelial-Mesenchymal transition (EMT) pathway. Furthermore, it could cause multidrug resistance in breast cancer cells. Interestingly, we found that GTSE1 could regulate the p53 function to alter the cell cycle distribution dependent on the mutation state of p53.

Conclusion

Our results reveal that GTSE1 played a key role in the progression of breast cancer, indicating that GTSE1 could serve as a novel biomarker to aid in the assessment of the prognosis of breast cancer.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13046-019-1157-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Genetic aspects of pituitary carcinoma: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Pituitary carcinoma (PC) is a rare type of malignant intracranial neoplasm defined as distant metastasis of pituitary adenoma (PA). Although PC incidence is low because only 0.1% to 0.2% of PAs ultimately develop into PCs, the prognosis is poor and 66% of patients die within the first year. Existing therapeutic measures, including surgical removal, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, have limited effectiveness. The lack of efficacy of current treatments is largely caused by the limited understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of PA and the malignant transformation to PC. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to summarize published research regarding gene and protein expression in PC to clarify the molecular mechanisms underlying PC genesis and development and identify new candidate diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for potential use in personalized treatment of PC.

METHODS

We followed the PRISMA guidelines to plan and conduct this systematic review. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant studies conducted before December 16, 2015 describing the association of PC with gene expression at the mRNA and protein levels. MeSH terms combined with free terms were used to retrieve the references.

RESULTS

In total, 207 records were obtained by primary search, and 32 were included in the systematic review. Compared with normal pituitary gland and/or PA, 30 and 18 genes were found to have higher or lower expression, respectively, in PCs using different analytical methods. Among them, we selected 9 upregulated and 7 downregulated genes for further analysis based on their identification as candidate treatment targets in other cancers, potential clinical application, or further research value.

CONCLUSION

Previous studies demonstrated that many genes promote PC malignant transformation, angiogenesis, invasion, metastasis, and recurrence. Although most of these genes and proteins have not been fully analyzed with regard to their downstream mechanisms or potential diagnostic and therapeutic application, they have the potential to become candidate PC biomarkers and/or molecular targets for guiding personalized treatment. Modern advanced technologies should be utilized in future research to identify more candidate genes for PC pathogenesis, as precisely targeted gene therapies against PC are urgently required.

Recurrence of giant cell tumour of bone: role of p53, cyclin D1, β-catenin and Ki67

PURPOSE

To determine various clinical, radiographic, and pathological parameters which may indicate an increased risk of Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) recurrence after surgical therapy.

METHODS

The study included a total of 164 GCTB samples; 118 (72 %) primary tumours, and 46 (28 %) recurrences; which were analyzed on immunohistochemistry for expression of Ki67, p53, cyclin D1, and β-catenin.

RESULTS

Among 13 analyzed clinical, radiological, and histological variables, which presented possible predictive factors for the incidence of GCTB relapse, univariate logistic regression (ULR) extract three highly statistically significant parameters: 1) lesion localization, 2) nuclear p53 expression in mononuclear cells, and 3) nuclear cyclin D1 expression in giant multinuclear cells. The multivariate logistic regression (MLR), revealing that p53 expression in mononuclear cells was the most significant predictive factor (HR = 6,181 p < 0,001), the positivity of which indicated six times higher probability for recurrence in GCTB. The expression of cyclin D1 in giant cells, containing less than 15 nuclei, was also statistically significant (HR = 8,398, p = 0,038) for predicting the recurrence, and demonstrated eight times more frequent recurrence in positive tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed independent predicting factors for GCTB reccurence: p53 expression in mononuclear tumour cells and cyclin D1 expression in giant multinuclear cells. Results are new addition to generally known parameters, such as: localization of lesion, number of surgical interventions, clear destruction of cortex with the presence of extracompartmental lesion, and histological criteria for malignancy and can help in further research and treatment of GCTB.

Giant cell tumor of bone: a basic science perspective

Comprehending the pathogenesis of giant cell tumor of bone (GCT) is of critical importance for developing novel targeted treatments for this locally-aggressive primary bone tumor. GCT is characterized by the presence of large multinucleated osteoclast-like giant cells distributed amongst mononuclear spindle-like stromal cells and other monocytes. The giant cells are principally responsible for the extensive bone resorption by the tumor. However, the spindle-like stromal cells chiefly direct the pathology of the tumor by recruiting monocytes and promoting their fusion into giant cells. The stromal cells also enhance the resorptive ability of the giant cells. This review encompasses many of the attributes of GCT, including the process of giant cell formation and the mechanisms of bone resorption. The significance of the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) in the development of GCT and the importance of proteases, including numerous matrix metalloproteinases, are highlighted. The mesenchymal lineage of the stromal cells and the origin of the hematopoietic monocytes are also discussed. Several aspects of GCT that require further understanding, including the etiology of the tumor, the mechanisms of metastases, and the development of an appropriate animal model, are also considered. By exploring the current status of GCT research, this review accentuates the significant progress made in understanding the biology of the tumor, and discusses important areas for future investigation.

Frequent upregulation of cyclin D1 and p16 expression with low Ki-67 scores in multinucleated giant cells

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Multinucleated giant cells are formed from the fusion of macrophages and are classified into foreign body-type giant cells (FBGCs), osteoclast-type giant cells (OCGCs) and Langhans-type giant cells (LHGCs). OCGCs display upregulated cyclin D1 expression with low Ki-67 activity. However, little is known about the expression of cell cycle regulators in the other types of multinucleated giant cells. We aimed to investigate the cell cycle status of multinucleated giant cells.

METHODS

The immunohistochemical expressions of cyclin D1, p16(INK4a) and Ki-67 were analyzed in a total of 127 cases showing multinucleated giant cells.

RESULTS

Cyclin D1 was overexpressed in 45 (88%) of 51 FBGC cases, 25 (86%) of 29 OCGC cases and 22 (47%) of 47 LHGC cases. p16(INK4a) showed diffuse nuclear and/or cytoplasmic overexpression in 45 (88%) of 51 FBGC cases, 27 (93%) of 29 OCGC cases and 24 (51%) of 47 LHGC cases. Ki-67 immunostaining was negative in almost all FBGC, OCGC and LHGC cases.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that FBGCs and OCGCs frequently show upregulation of cyclin D1 and p16(INK4a) expression with low Ki-67 scores. This suggests that multinucleated giant cells are arrested in the G1/S cell cycle transition.

Centrosome abnormalities in giant cell tumour of bone: possible association with chromosomal instability

Giant cell tumour of bone, a benign but potentially aggressive neoplasm, shows an increasing rate of chromosomal aneusomy that correlates with clinical course. Mechanisms that generate chromosomal instability in giant cell tumour of bone are poorly understood. One possible cause of chromosomal instability is an error in mitotic segregation due to numeric and/or functional abnormalities of centrosomes. Centrosome alteration is a common phenomenon in many cancers and has a major role in the development of chromosomal instability in cancer cells. To gain an insight into the possible mechanism for the generation of chromosomal instability in giant cell tumour of bone, we analysed 100 cases, including 57 primary nonrecurrent, 35 recurrent and 8 malignant giant cell tumour of bone cases. gamma-Tubulin immunohistochemistry was performed on tissue microarrays of 59 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded cases, whereas pericentrin and gamma-tubulin fluorescent immunocytochemistry was carried out on 41 frozen smears. Fluorescent in situ hybridization was performed on 23 cases of pericentrin immunostained smears, allowing the simultaneous analysis of centrosomes and chromosome aberrations. Centrosome amplification was significantly higher in recurrent and malignant giant cell tumour of bones compared with nonrecurrent tumours (P<0.001). A comparison of the percentage of aneusomic cells with a normal centrosome content (4.7%) with that of aneusomic cells with centrosome amplification (6.4%) revealed no significant association between chromosome number alterations and centrosome aberrations (P=0.31). These findings indicate that centrosome alteration and frequency of aneusomy correlate with clinical behaviour; the lack of an association between centrosome amplification and chromosome number alteration suggests that alternative causative mechanisms produce genetic instability in giant cell tumour of bone.

Immunohistochemical analyses of beta-catenin and cyclin D1 expression in giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB): a possible role of Wnt pathway in GCTB tumorigenesis

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a benign neoplasm but occasionally shows local recurrence, and histologically consists of osteoclast-like giant cells (GC) and stromal mononuclear cells (SC), which are capable of proliferation and osteoblastic differentiation. Activation of Wnt signaling can induce osteoblast differentiation and osteoclastgenesis during bone resorption process. This study analyzed the profiles of beta-catenin and cyclin D1 expression in GCTB to elucidate an involvement of Wnt pathway in tumorigenesis. We performed immunohistochemistry for beta-catenin, cyclin D1, and Ki-67 in 16 GCTB tumors, including 5 recurrent cases that were surgically resected. All 16 cases of GCTB displayed beta-catenin, cyclin D1, and Ki-67 expression. Immunoreactivity for beta-catenin was observed in nuclei of SC and GC. Cyclin D1 immunoreactivity was found mainly in nuclei of GC, while Ki-67 immunoreactivity was restricted to nuclei of SC. The nuclear beta-catenin labeling index (LI) in both SC (60.6 vs. 41.8%, p=0.074) and GC (41.7 vs. 20.1%, p=0.095) was higher in recurrent tumors than in primary tumors in all the 4 cases. However, Ki-67 LI in SC (18.8 vs. 19.9%, p=0.851) and cyclin D1 LI in GC (55.4 vs. 70.1%, p=0.225) were not higher in recurrent tumors than in primary tumors. Our results suggested activation of Wnt/ beta-catenin pathway in GCTB tumorigenesis. Since cyclin D1 in GC was never associated with the expression of the well-known proliferative marker Ki-67, cyclin D1 expression might play a role in GC formation instead of promoting cell proliferation during GCTB tumorigenesis. Importantly, it was suggested that the nuclear beta-catenin staining level might be associated with tumor recurrence in GCTB.

Giant cell tumor of bone express p63

p63 contributes to skeletal development and tumor formation; however, little is known regarding its activity in the context of bone and soft tissue neoplasms. The purpose of this study was to investigate p63 expression in giant cell tumor of bone and to determine whether it can be used to discriminate between other giant cell-rich tumors. Seventeen cases of giant cell tumor of bone were examined to determine the cell type expressing p63 and identify the isoforms present. Total RNA or cell protein was extracted from mononuclear- or giant cell-enriched fractions or intact giant cell tumor of bone and examined by RT-PCR or western blot, respectively. Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate p63 expression in paraffin embedded sections of giant cell tumor of bone and in tumors containing multinucleated giant cells, including: giant cell tumor of tendon sheath, pigmented villonodular synovitis, aneurysmal bone cyst, chondroblastoma, and central giant cell granuloma. The mononuclear cell component in all cases of giant cell tumor of bone was found to express all forms of TAp63 (alpha, beta, and gamma), whereas only low levels of the TAp63 alpha and beta isoforms were detected in multinucleated cells; DeltaNp63 was not detected in these tumors. Western blot analysis identified p63 protein as being predominately localized to mononuclear cells compared to giant cells. This was confirmed by immunohistochemical staining of paraffin-embedded tumor sections, with expression identified in all cases of giant cell tumor of bone. Only a proportion of cases of aneurysmal bone cyst and chondroblastoma showed p63 immunoreactivity whereas it was not detected in central giant cell granuloma, giant cell tumor of tendon sheath, or pigmented villonodular synovitis. The differential expression of p63 in giant cell tumor of bone and central giant cell granuloma suggest that these two tumors may have a different pathogenesis. Moreover, p63 may be a useful biomarker to differentiate giant cell tumor of bone from central giant cell granuloma and other giant cell-rich tumors, such as giant cell tumor of tendon sheath and pigmented villonodular synovitis.

Giant cell tumour of bone: morphological, biological and histogenetical aspects

The giant cell tumour of bone (GCT) is a locally aggressive intraosseous neoplasm of obscure biological behaviour. Although well defined in clinical, radiological and histological terms, detailed information on its biological development is still relatively incomplete. The tumoral tissue consists of three cell types--the neoplastic giant cell tumour stromal cells (GCTSC), representing the proliferative fraction, secondarily recruited mononuclear histiocytic cells (MNHC) and multinuclear giant cells (MNGC). These cellular components interact together with factors that have a role in regulating osteoclast function in normal bone tissue (e.g. RANK, RANKL, OPG, M-CSF). Recent publications suggest that the neoplastic stromal cells express differentiation features of mesenchymal stem cells. Further research of the pathogenesis of GCT as well as the complex interactions of its cellular populations may provide the knowledge necessary for developing approaches for a biological-based therapy of this neoplasm.