Initial repair strengths of two methods for acute medial collateral ligament injuries of the elbow

The effect of a coronoid prosthesis on restoring stability to the coronoid-deficient elbow: a biomechanical study

PURPOSE

The coronoid process has been recognized as a critical component in maintaining elbow stability. In the case of comminuted coronoid fractures, where repair is not possible or has failed, a prosthesis may be beneficial in restoring the osseous integrity of the elbow joint. The hypothesis of this in vitro biomechanical study was that a coronoid prosthesis would restore stability to the coronoid-deficient elbow.

METHODS

An anatomically shaped metallic coronoid prosthesis was designed and developed based on computed tomography-derived measurements and optimized to account for average cartilage thickness. Elbow kinematics and stability were determined for 8 cadaveric arms in active and passive elbow flexion in the varus, valgus, horizontal, and vertical positions using an elbow motion simulator. Varus-valgus angulation and internal-external rotation of the ulna relative to the humerus were quantified in the intact state, after collateral ligament sectioning and repair (control state), after a simulated 40% transverse coronoid fracture, and after implantation of the coronoid prosthesis.

RESULTS

Internal rotation of the ulna increased with a 40% coronoid fracture in the horizontal and varus positions. Increases in varus angulation after coronoid fracture were also observed in the horizontal and varus positions, during active and passive flexion, respectively. Following implantation of the coronoid prosthesis, elbow kinematics were restored similar to control levels in all elbow positions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support our hypothesis that an anatomically shaped coronoid prosthesis would be effective in restoring stability to the coronoid-deficient elbow.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study provides evidence that the use of an anatomical implant restores stability to the coronoid-deficient elbow and rationale for further study and development of this method. For comminuted coronoid fractures, where repair is not possible or has failed, our research indicates that a prosthesis may be a feasible treatment option.

Proximal forearm fractures

Unfortunately, the literature has little guidance for revision elbow surgery. This article attempts to supplement what is known in the literature with the author's anecdotal experience. With this article, it is the author's hope that the reader may learn from his or her successes and his or her failures without having to discover them first hand. There is good reason for angst to overcome surgeons looking at radiographs depicting a traumatized proximal ulna or radius. Surgeons know that there is a good chance they will be seeing these patients for a long time.

The effect of medial collateral ligament repair tension on elbow joint kinematics and stability

PURPOSE

Medial collateral ligament (MCL) repair is commonly performed for the management of acute or subacute instability after elbow dislocations and fracture-dislocations. The effectiveness of transosseous repair of the MCL, as is typically performed clinically, in restoring the normal kinematics and stability of the elbow is of interest as is the effect of MCL tensioning on the initial stability of the elbow. The purpose of this study was to determine whether suture repair of the MCL is able to restore the normal kinematics and stability of the elbow and to determine the optimal initial MCL repair tension.

METHODS

Six cadaveric upper extremities were mounted in an upper limb joint simulator. Simulated active and passive elbow flexion was generated while the kinematics were measured with the arm in the dependent and the valgus gravity-loaded orientations. After testing the intact elbow, the MCL was released at its humeral attachment and repaired using a transosseous suture technique at three different repair tensions: 20, 40, and 60 N.

RESULTS

Medial collateral ligament repair using a transosseous suture technique restored the kinematics and stability of the MCL-deficient elbow. Motion pathways were affected by the magnitude of initial MCL tension. For all arm orientations and forearm positions, the 20-N and 40-N repairs were not statistically different from each other or from the intact MCL. The 60-N repairs, however, were often statistically different than the other groups, suggesting an overtightening that tended to pull the ulna into a varus position-especially in the midrange of flexion.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that MCL repair using transosseous sutures provide adequate joint stability to permit early motion. There is a broad range of acceptable tensions for MCL repair, which is a favorable, clinically relevant finding. Clinical studies are needed to validate these in vitro results.