Finite element analysis of glenoid-sided lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

[Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty - Current Concepts]

Due to first promising long term outcome data, reverse shoulder arthroplasty experienced an immense increase of usage during the past decade. Moreover, the initial Grammont concept has constantly been refined and adapted to current scientific findings. Therefore, clinical and radiological problems like scapular notching and postoperative instability were constantly addressed but do still remain an area of concern.This article summarises current concepts in reverse shoulder arthroplasty and gives an overview of actual indications like cuff tear arthropathy, severe osteoarthritis, proximal humerus fractures, tumours, fracture sequelae as well as revision surgery and their corresponding clinical and radiological results.

Ten technical aspects of baseplate fixation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for patients without glenoid bone loss: a systematic review

The aim of this systematic review was to collect evidence on the following 10 technical aspects of glenoid baseplate fixation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA): screw insertion angles; screw orientation; screw quantity; screw length; screw type; baseplate tilt; baseplate position; baseplate version and rotation; baseplate design; and anatomical safe zones. Five literature libraries were searched for eligible clinical, cadaver, biomechanical, virtual planning, and finite element analysis studies. Studies including patients >16 years old in which at least one of the ten abovementioned technical aspects was assessed were suitable for analysis. We excluded studies of patients with: glenoid bone loss; bony increased offset-reversed shoulder arthroplasty; rTSA with bone grafts; and augmented baseplates. Quality assessment was performed for each included study. Sixty-two studies were included, of which 41 were experimental studies (13 cadaver, 10 virtual planning, 11 biomechanical, and 7 finite element studies) and 21 were clinical studies (12 retrospective cohorts and 9 case-control studies). Overall, the quality of included studies was moderate or high. The majority of studies agreed upon the use of a divergent screw fixation pattern, fixation with four screws (to reduce micromotions), and inferior positioning in neutral or anteversion. A general consensus was not reached on the other technical aspects. Most surgical aspects of baseplate fixation can be decided without affecting fixation strength. There is not a single strategy that provides the best outcome. Therefore, guidelines should cover multiple surgical options that can achieve adequate baseplate fixation.

How to avoid baseplate failure: the effect of compression and reverse shoulder arthroplasty baseplate design on implant stability

BACKGROUND

Failure to achieve fixation of the glenoid baseplate will lead to clinical failure. The fixation of the baseplate to the scapula must be able to withstand sufficient shear forces to allow bony ingrowth. The importance of compression to neutralize the forces at the baseplate-bone interface has been assumed to be critical in limiting excessive micromotion. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of compression on implant stability with different baseplate designs.

METHODS

Various baseplate designs (1-piece monolithic central screw [1P], 2-piece locking central screw [2PL], and 2-piece nonlocking center screw [2PNL]) were investigated at 3 different compressive forces (high [810 N], medium [640 N], and low [530 N]). Synthetic bone cylinders were instrumented, and peripheral screws were used in all models. The combination of 1 locking and 3 nonlocking peripheral screw fixation was selected as worst-case scenario. Dynamic testing protocol followed the ASTM F2028-17 standard. The baseplate micromotion at high compression was compared to low compression. Additionally, the baseplate micromotion for each design was compared at baseline (first 50 cycles) and at 10,000 cycles for the 3 different compressive forces where motion above 150 μm was defined as failure.

RESULTS

Baseplate micromotion was found to negatively correlate with compression (rpb = -0.83, P < .0001). At baseline, all baseplate designs were considered stable, regardless of compression. With high compression, average micromotion at the glenoid baseplate-bone interface remained below the 150-μm threshold for all baseplate designs at 10,000 cycles (1P: 50 ± 10 μm; 2PL: 78 ± 32 μm; 2PNL: 79 ± 8 μm; P = .060). With medium compression, average micromotion at 10,000 cycles for all 3 designs remained below the 150-μm threshold (1P: 88 ± 22 μm; 2PL: 132 ± 26 μm; 2PNL: 107 ± 39 μm). The 2PL design had the highest amount of micromotion (P = .013). With low compression, both 2-piece designs had an average micromotion above the 150-μm threshold whereas the 1-piece design did not (1P: 133 ± 35 μm; 2PL: 183 ± 21 μm; 2PNL: 166 ± 39 μm). The 2PL design had significantly higher micromotion when compared to 1P design (P = .041).

DISCUSSION

The stability of a central screw baseplate correlates with the amount of compression obtained and is affected by implant design. For the same amount of compression, more micromotion is observed in a 2-piece design than a 1-piece design.

Femoral head allograft for glenoid bone loss in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty: functional and radiologic outcomes

BACKGROUND

Several techniques have been adopted during primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to manage glenoid bone defect. Among bone grafts, humeral head autograft is currently the mainstream option. However, autologous humeral heads may be unavailable or inadequate, and allografts may be a viable alternative. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the functional and radiologic outcomes of femoral head allografts for glenoid bone defects in primary RSA.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study with prospective data collection enrolling 20 consecutive patients who underwent RSA with femoral head allografts for glenoid bone defects. Indications for surgery were eccentric cuff tear arthropathy in 10 cases (50%), concentric osteoarthritis in 9 cases (45%), and fracture sequelae in 1 case (5%). Each patient was evaluated preoperatively and at follow-up by radiologic and computed tomography (CT) and by assessing the range of motion (ROM) and the Constant-Murley score (CMS). A CT-based software, a patient-specific 3D model of the scapula, and patient-specific instrumentation were used to shape the graft and to assess the position of K-wire for the central peg. Postoperatively, CT scans were used to identify graft incorporation and resorption.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 26.5 months (24-38), ROM and CMS showed a statistically significant improvement (all P = .001). The median measures of the graft were as follows: 28 mm (28-29) for diameter, 22° (10°-31°) for angle, 4 mm (2-8 mm) for minimum thickness, and 15 mm (11-21 mm) for maximum thickness. Before the surgery, the median glenoid version was 21.8° (16.5°-33.5°) for the retroverted glenoids and -13.5° (-23° to -12°) for the anteverted glenoids. At the follow-up, the median postoperative baseplate retroversion was 5.7° (2.2°-1.5°) (P = .001), and this value was close to the 4° retroversion planned on the preoperative CT-based software. Postoperative major complications were noted in 4 patients: 2 dislocations, 1 baseplate failure following a high-energy trauma, and 1 septic baseplate failure. Partial graft resorption without glenoid component failure was observed in 3 cases that did not require revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

The femoral head allograft for glenoid bone loss in primary RSA restores shoulder function, with CMS values comparable to those of sex- and age-matched healthy individuals. A high rate of incorporation of the graft and satisfactory correction of the glenoid version can be expected after surgery. The management of glenoid bone defects remains a challenging procedure, and a 15% risk of major complication must be considered.

[Metal glenoid augmentation in revision arthroplasty]

Glenoid implantation in revision arthroplasty of the shoulder remains a technical challenge in the case of severe bone loss. Metal glenoid augmentation and patient-specific glenoid implants represent new treatment options with great potential. Virtual planning techniques allow a differentiated evaluation of the extent of the bone loss and the planning of different augmentation options. Although not clearly defined so far, a patient-specific implant can be indicated if adequate fixation of the base plate in the native bone appears questionable. The planning is carried out with the support of the prostheses manufacturer and the stability is simulated using finite element analysis. A high level of primary stability is achieved by an optimized fitting of the implant into the bony defect. The short-term results are promising. However, in the absence of long-term results and limited options in case of revision, the use of a custom-made glenoid warrants a strict indication.

Cause analysis of the liner dissociation of a customized reverse shoulder prosthesis based on finite element analysis

Background: Dissociation of the polyethylene liner after reverse shoulder arthroplasty could cause shoulder dislocation that could not achieve closed reduction. The cause of liner dissociation is currently unclear.

Method: Non-homogeneous model of the bone was constructed and dynamic finite element analysis was utilized to simulate the impingement of the polyethylene liner and scapula during humeral adduction. The stress distribution of the fixation claws, their degree of deformation (DOD), and the stress of the impingement sites in three initial humeral postures (neutral, 30° flexion, and 30° extension) were measured and analyzed. The influence of the liner material stiffness was also investigated.

Result: The impingement stress on the liner and scapula was 100–200 MPa, and different humeral postures caused different locations of impingement points. The fixation claws’ maximum principal stress (MPS) results were below 5 MPa. In the connection area between some fixation claws and the liner, compressive stresses on the inside and tensile stresses on the outside were observed, which showed that the fixation claws were prone to deform toward the center direction. The maximum DOD results of three initial humeral postures (neutral, 30° flexion, and 30° extension) were 3.6%, 2.8%, and 3.5%, respectively. The maximum DOD results of neutral initial humeral posture were 0.51% and 11.4% when the elastic modulus of the liner was increased and decreased by a factor of 10, respectively.

Conclusion: The humeral adduction impingement could lead to the deformation of the claw-shaped liner fixation structure, which might be one of the reasons for the liner dissociation. The increased stiffness of the liner material helped to reduce the deformation of the fixation structure.

Considerations for Shoulder Arthroplasty Implant Selection in Primary Glenohumeral Arthritis With Posterior Glenoid Deformity

Glenoid deformity has an important effect on outcomes and complication rates after shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral arthritis. The B2/B3 glenoid has particularly been associated with a poorer outcome with shoulder arthroplasty compared with other glenoid types. One of the primary challenges is striking a balance between deformity correction and joint line preservation. Recently, there has been a proliferation of both anatomic and reverse implants that may be used to address glenoid deformity. The purpose of this review was to provide an evidence-based approach for addressing glenoid deformity associated with primary glenohumeral arthritis.

Mechanical behavior of hybrid glenoid components compared to all-PE components: a finite element analysis

Purpose

The purpose of this finite element study was to compare bone and cement stresses and implant micromotions among all-polyethylene (PE) and hybrid glenoid components. The hypothesis was that, compared to all-PE components, hybrid components yield lower bone and cement stresses with smaller micromotions.

Methods

Implant micromotions and cement and bone stresses were compared among 4 all PE (U-PG, U-KG, A-KG, I-KG) and 2 hybrid (E-hCG, I-hPG) virtually implanted glenoid components. Glenohumeral joint reaction forces were applied at five loading regions (central, anterior, posterior, superior and inferior). Implant failure was assumed if glenoid micromotion exceeded 75 µm or cement stresses exceeded 4 MPa. The critical cement volume (CCV) was based on the percentage of cement volume that exceeded 4 MPa. Results were pooled and summarized in boxplots, and differences evaluated using pairwise Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests.

Results

Differences in cement stress were found only between the I-hPG hybrid component (2.9 ± 1.0 MPa) and all-PE keeled-components (U-KG: 3.8 ± 0.9 MPa, p = 0.017; A-KG: 3.6 ± 0.5 MPa, p = 0.014; I-KG: 3.6 ± 0.6 MPa, p = 0.040). There were no differences in cortical and trabecular bone stresses among glenoid components. The E-hCG hybrid component exceeded micromotions of 75 µm in 2 patients. There were no differences in %CCV among glenoid components.

Conclusions

Finite element analyses reveal that compared to all-PE glenoid components, hybrid components yield similar average stresses within bone and cement. Finally, risk of fatigue failure of the cement mantle is equal for hybrid and all-PE components, as no difference in %CCV was observed.

Level of evidence

IV, in-silico.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40634-022-00494-8.

Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Indications for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA) have been extended over the last 25 years, and RSA has become the most frequently implanted shoulder arthroplasty worldwide. The initial Grammont design with medialization of the joint center of rotation (JCOR), placement of the JCOR at the bone–implant interface, distalization and semi-constrained configuration has been associated with drawbacks such as reduced rotation and range of motion (ROM), notching, instability and loss of shoulder contour. This review summarizes new strategies to overcome these drawbacks and analyzes the use of glenoid-sided, humeral-sided or global bipolar lateralization, which are applied differently by surgeons and current implant manufacturers. Advantages and drawbacks are discussed. There is evidence that lateralization addresses the initial drawbacks of the Grammont design, improving stability, rates of notching, ROM and shoulder contour, but the ideal extent of lateralization of the glenoid and humerus remains unclear, as well as the maximal acceptable joint reaction force after reduction. Overstuffing and spine of scapula fractures are potential risks. CT-based 3D planning as well as artificial intelligence will help surgeons with planning and execution of appropriate lateralization in RSA. Long-term follow-up of lateralization with new implant designs and implantation strategies is needed.

Complications of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Computational Modelling Perspective

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is an established treatment for elderly patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears, complex proximal humerus fractures, and revision arthroplasty; however, with the increasing indications for RTSA over the last decade and younger implant recipients, post-operative complications have become more frequent, which has driven advances in computational modeling and simulation of reverse shoulder biomechanics. The objective of this study was to provide a review of previously published studies that employed computational modeling to investigate complications associated with RTSA. Models and applications were reviewed and categorized into four possible complications that included scapular notching, component loosening, glenohumeral joint instability, and acromial and scapular spine fracture, all of which remain a common cause of significant functional impairment and revision surgery. The computational shoulder modeling studies reviewed were primarily used to investigate the effects of implant design, intraoperative component placement, and surgical technique on postoperative shoulder biomechanics after RTSA, with the findings ultimately used to elucidate and mitigate complications. The most significant challenge associated with the development of computational models is in the encapsulation of patient-specific anatomy and surgical planning. The findings of this review provide a basis for future direction in computational modeling of the reverse shoulder.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a hybrid baseplate fixation mechanism

Background

Despite the success of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), complication rates remain high (13% to 25%), due to instability, infection, and glenoid component loosening, which can lead to revision. The aim of the present study was to report the early clinical outcomes of RSA using a new hybrid baseplate design, in comparison with the literature on other common RSA baseplates.

Methods

The authors retrospectively analyzed the records of 142 patients (142 shoulders) who underwent primary RSA using a hybrid baseplate design by the senior surgeons between May 2014 and December 2018. Preoperative and postoperative assessments included the Constant score (CS) and range of motion, including active forward elevation, external rotation, and internal rotation.

Results

Of the initial cohort of 142 patients, 13 were lost to follow-up (8.6%), 2 died (1.3%), and 8 required reoperations with implant removal (5.3%). The remaining 119 patients comprised 71 women (60%) and 48 men (40%), aged 73.6 ± 7.3 years at index surgery, 43 of whom required bony increased offset (36%). At a minimum follow-up of 2 years, the CS improved by 37.3 ± 16.1, active forward elevation increased by 51.2° ± 38.1°, external rotation increased by 16.4° ± 25.0°, and internal rotation increased by 1.5 ± 3.2.

Conclusion

At a minimum follow-up of 2 years after RSA using a new hybrid baseplate system, the CS and range of motion were satisfactory and comparable to those in recent systematic reviews. The findings of this study suggest that this hybrid baseplate system provides satisfactory outcomes in the short term, although longer follow-up studies are needed to validate its long-term efficacy.

Lateralized versus nonlateralized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Throughout the history of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, the extent of lateral offset has changed considerably from "too lateral" to "too medial" and has been lately swinging back towards a point somewhere in between. Nonlateralized designs minimize shear forces on the glenoid and decrease force required by the deltoid. Glenoid lateralization decreases impingement and scapular notching and improves range of motion. Humeral lateralization achieves a more anatomic position of the tuberosities while maintaining a nonlateralized center of rotation. Several factors play a role in choosing the extent of lateral offset and method of lateralization.

Is bone grafting always necessary in revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with uncontained glenoid bone defects?

BACKGROUND

Patients with an uncontained glenoid bone defect can still successfully undergo a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). Currently, there is a tendency toward reconstruction of the premorbid glenoid plane with bone grafts, which is technically demanding. We investigated whether central peg positioning in the spine pillar (CPPSP) is a more feasible alternative to the use of bone grafts.

METHODS

This study included 60 revisions to an RTSA with uncontained glenoid bone defects. Patients were treated with bone grafts in 29 cases and with the CPPSP technique in 31 cases. We assessed clinical results using the Constant score and assessed the complication rate.

RESULTS

The Constant score changed from 42 to 69 points in the CPPSP group and from 47 to 60 points in the bone graft group. This difference in the increase in the Constant score was significant (P = .031) owing to a significant difference in strength in favor of the CPPSP group. The overall complication rate was 37.7% (20 of 53 patients), with a reoperation rate of 18.9% (10 of 53). Dislocations occurred only in the CPPSP group (n = 3), and loosening of the glenoid occurred only in the bone graft group (n = 3).

CONCLUSION

Patients with uncontained glenoid bone defects undergoing revision to an RTSA obtain similar clinical results with the CPPSP technique compared with the use of bone grafts. The CPPSP technique is a valid alternative but results in different complications.

Treating cuff tear arthropathy by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical and the radiological outcome?

PURPOSE

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is widely used for the treatment of cuff tear arthropathy. Standard implants consist of a humeral component with an inclination angle of 155° and a glenosphere without lateral offset. Recently, lower inclination angles of the humeral component as well as lateralized glenospheres are implanted to provide better rotation of the arm and to decrease the rate of scapular notching. This study investigates the clinical and radiological results of a standard reverse total shoulder in comparison with an implant with an inclination angle of 135° in combination with a 4 mm lateralized glenosphere in context of cuff tear arthropathy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For this retrospective comparative analysis 42 patients treated by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy were included. Twenty-one patients (m = 11, f = 10; mean age 76 years; mean follow-up 42 months) were treated with a standard 155° humeral component and a standard glenosphere with caudal eccentricity (group A), while twenty-one patients (m = 5, f = 16; mean age 72 years; mean follow-up 34 months) were treated with a 135° humeral component and 4 mm lateral offset of the glenosphere (group B). At follow-up patients of both groups were assessed with plain X-rays (a.p. and axial view), Constant Score, adjusted Constant Score, the subjective shoulder value and the range of motion.

RESULTS

The clinical results were similar in both groups concerning the Constant Score (group A = 56.3 vs. group B = 56.1; p = 0.733), the adjusted CS (group A = 70.4% vs. group B = 68.3%; p = 0.589) and the SSV (group A = 72.0% vs. group B = 75.2%; p = 0.947). The range of motion of the operated shoulders did not differ significantly between group A and group B: Abduction = 98° versus 97.9°, p = 0.655; external rotation with the arm at side = 17.9° versus 18.7°, p = 0.703; external rotation with the arm positioned in 90° of abduction = 22.3° versus 24.7°, p = 0.524; forward flexion = 116.1° versus 116.7°, p = 0.760. The rate of scapular notching was higher (p = 0.013) in group A (overall: 66%, grade 1: 29%, grade 2: 29%, grade 3: 10%, grade 4: 0%) in comparison to group B (overall: 33%, grade 1: 33%, grade 2: 0%, grade 3: 0%, grade 4: 0%). Radiolucency around the humeral component was detected in two patients of group B. Stress shielding at the proximal humerus was observed in six patients of Group A (29%; cortical thinning and osteopenia in zone M1 and L1) and two patients of group B (10%; cortical thinning and osteopenia in zone M1 and L1). Calcifications of the triceps origin were observed in both groups (group A = 48% vs. group B = 38%).

CONCLUSION

Theoretically, a lower inclination angle of the humeral component and an increased lateral offset of the glenosphere lead to improved impingement-free range of motion and a decreased rate of scapular notching, when compared to a standard reverse total shoulder implant. This study compared two different designs of numerous options concerning the humeral component and the glenosphere. In comparison to a standard-fashioned implant with a humeral inclination of 155° and a standard glenosphere, implants with a humeral inclination angle of 135° and a 4 mm lateralized glenosphere lead to comparable clinical results and rotatory function, while the rate of scapular notching is decreased by almost 50%. While the different implant designs did not affect the clinical outcome, our results indicate that a combination of a lower inclination angle of the humeral component and lateralized glenosphere should be favored to reduce scapular notching.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Factors Influencing Appropriate Implant Selection and Position in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has increased in popularity and has provided improved but somewhat variable results. These variable outcomes may be related to many factors, including implant design, component positioning, specific indication, and patient anatomy. The original Grammont design provided a solution to the high failure rate at the time but was found to have a high rate of scapular notching and poor restoration of rotation. Modern lateralized designs are more consistent in reducing scapular notching while improving range of motion, especially in regards to external rotation. This review article summarizes the effects of modern reverse shoulder prostheses on outcomes.

The effect of metaglene lateralization on joint mobility of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A cadaveric biomechanical study

Introduction

Lateralization of the metaglene reduces scapular notching or impingement. However, the effect on joint mobility remains unclear. With increased attention to reverse shoulder arthroplasty over the past years, the aim of this biomechanical study is to analyze the effect of metaglene lateralization on range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Methods

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (DeltaXtend; Fa. Depuy/Synthes) was performed in 7 cadaveric shoulders. Lateralization of the metaglene was performed in increments, using spacers of +0 mm (subgroup I), +5 mm (subgroup II), +10 mm (subgroup III). Deltoid muscle (pars clavicularis, acromialis and spinalis), teres minor (TMI), infraspinatus (IF) and subscapularis muslces (SSC) were loaded separately. Range of motion was measured by using a motion capture system (Optotrak Certus) in the sagittal plane (z-axis), coronar plane (x-axis) and transversal plane (y-axis). A custom-made biomechanical test set up was used to test the samples with a constant preload with additional testing load up to 4 kg on each muscle.

Results

Specimens showed a tendency towards increased range of motion in abduction (deltoid, pars acromialis), external rotation (IS/TMI) and internal rotation (SSC) in subgroup II, compared to subgroups I and III, without reaching the level of significance Abduction at maximum used load was 46° (subgroup I), 62° (subgroup II) and 22° (subgroup III). The mean external rotation (ISF) at maximum used load was 25° (I), 28° (II) and 24° (III). Mean internal rotation was 22° (subgroup I), 48° (subgroup II) and 26° (subgroup III).

Conclusion

Moderate lateralization of the glenosphere of +5 mm has improved the range of motion in our experimental cadaveric setup. Especially a higher internal and external rotation can be reached with less load.Level of evidence III.

Outcomes after a Grammont-style reverse total shoulder arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the factors associated with outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated all RTSAs performed by the senior author between January 1, 2007, and November 1, 2017. We evaluated pain visual analog scale (VAS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) scores and complication and reoperation rates at a minimum of 2-year follow-up. We evaluated preoperative and 2-week postoperative radiographs for glenoid inclination (GI), medialization as distance between the center of the humeral head or glenosphere and the line of the deltoid, and distalization via the acromial-greater tuberosity distance. We performed inter- and intrarater reliabilities via intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and conducted a multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

We included 230 RTSAs in the analysis, with 70% follow-up at a median of 3.4 years. Reliability was acceptable with all ICCs >.678. Increased postoperative GI was significantly associated with increased VAS pain postoperatively (P = .008). Increased distalization was associated with an increased rate of complications and reoperations (P = .032). Younger age (P = .008), female gender (P = .009), and lower body mass index (BMI) (P = .006) were associated with worse ASES scores. Female gender (P < .001) and lower BMI (P = .039) were associated with worse SST scores. Female gender (P = .013) and lower BMI (P = .005) were associated with worse VAS-pain scores.

CONCLUSION

Age, gender, and BMI are associated with outcome after RTSA. In this retrospective analysis of a Grammont-style RTSA, superior inclination is associated with increased pain postoperatively, whereas excessive arm lengthening is associated with increased risk for complication or reoperation.

Effect of RSA glenoid baseplate central fixation on micromotion and bone stress

Background

In reverse shoulder arthroplasties (RSA), osseous in-growth is promoted if glenoid micromotion does not exceed 150 μm. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the configuration of central fixation for RSA glenoid baseplates reduces implant micromotion or changes scapula bone stresses.

Methods

Using finite element analysis, glenoid baseplate fixation was tested in a cohort of 3 male and 2 female patients who were to undergo RSA. Computer models were created for 3 different RSA glenoid baseplate and 84 glenosphere designs, a central threaded peg (1 variant, D-TP), a central unthreaded peg (2 variants, I- 85 P(15) and I-P(25)), and a central peg with a screw (2 variants, A-PS and I-PS). A compressive and shear force of 756 N was distributed across the glenosphere with the scapula anchored.

Results

Displacement was within 20-130 μm at the glenosphere baseplate-bone interface for all baseplates. The glenospheres with unthreaded pegs had intermediate displacement values (I-P(15): median, 89 μm; range, 32-112 μm; and I-P(25): median, 93 μm; range, 31-109 μm). The von Mises stresses were 1.8-7.0 MPa within cortical bone and 0.6-1.6 MPa within trabecular bone. Cortical bone stresses were similar with unthreaded pegs (I-P(15): median, 4.2 MPa; range, 1.8-6.0 MPa; and I-P(25): median, 4.2 MPa; range, 1.8-6.1 MPa), whereas mean trabecular stresses were similar for all configurations.

Conclusions

All configurations yielded adequate stability, with micromotions being below 150 μm. The unthreaded pegged designs provided a valid alternative to the stable threaded pegged convex baseplates in terms of micromotions and bone stresses.

Finite Element Analysis of Custom Shoulder Implants Provides Accurate Prediction of Initial Stability

Custom reverse shoulder implants represent a valuable solution for patients with large bone defects. Since each implant has unique patient-specific features, finite element (FE) analysis has the potential to guide the design process by virtually comparing the stability of multiple configurations without the need of a mechanical test. The aim of this study was to develop an automated virtual bench test to evaluate the initial stability of custom shoulder implants during the design phase, by simulating a fixation experiment as defined by ASTM F2028-14. Three-dimensional (3D) FE models were generated to simulate the stability test and the predictions were compared to experimental measurements. Good agreement was found between the baseplate displacement measured experimentally and determined from the FE analysis (Spearman’s rank test, p < 0.05, correlation coefficient ρs = 0.81). Interface micromotion analysis predicted good initial fixation (micromotion <150 µm, commonly used as bone ingrowth threshold). In conclusion, the finite element model presented in this study was able to replicate the mechanical condition of a standard test for a custom shoulder implants.

Lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A review

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty, as originally designed by Grammont, has revolutionized the treatment of rotator cuff arthropathy as well as fractures about the proximal humerus. The original design consisted of glenoid and humeral components with a medialized center or rotation compared to the native shoulder. Long term outcome studies on this design demonstrated high rates of scapular notching as well as significant loss of external rotation. To combat these flaws, prosthesis design has evolved to include the concept of lateralization whereby the center of rotation is moved laterally compared to the Grammont prosthesis via either the glenoid or humeral components. Lateralization via the glenoid component has sought to reduce scapular notching, however, concerns over early loosening have been raised secondary to increasing stress at the glenosphere/glenoid interface. Lateralization via the humeral component has been theorized to improve the mechanics of the remaining rotator cuff and deltoid musculature while avoiding the problems inherent with glenoid lateralization. While limited clinical evidence is available currently to support one design over the other, multiple biomechanical studies have shown improvements in rates of scapular notching and post-operative external rotation for lateralized humeral and glenoid components. Future research should aim to delineate advantages of one design over the other or optimal combinations of the two designs.

Numerical Study of the Biomechanical Behaviour of the Different Implantation Methods of the Reverse Shoulder Replacement

Despite the widespread use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, there is still a problem of conflict between the polyethylene cup of the prosthesis and the scapula, which over time causes the phenomenon of notching. In order to circumvent this problem correctly, several innovations have been proposed regard to the implementation method. In this context, the aim of this work is to study the biomechanical behavior of new implantation methods using different glenoid configurations in order to avoid the notching phenomenon between the cup and the scapula. The study was performed using virtual prototypes of the shoulder prosthesis assembly. Using CT scan images, three-dimensional models of shoulder bones were reconstructed. The implantation of the prosthesis in the three-dimensional model was performed in collaboration with an experienced surgeon from the Caduceus Clinic (Oran, Algeria). The numerical models were imported to finite element calculation software. After the validation of the numerical model using the literature results, we assessed the biomechanical behavior of four implantation methods under the same boundary conditions and abduction movements. From the obtained results, it was found that among the proposed methods, the BIO-SR lateralization method offers significant biomechanical advantages in terms of the forces applied to the glenoid during the abduction movement.

A new method to evaluate the influence of the glenosphere positioning on stability and range of motion of a reverse shoulder prosthesis

PURPOSE

Shoulder instability and reduced range of motion are two common complications of a total reverse shoulder arthroplasty. In this work, a new approach is proposed to estimate how the glenoid component positioning can influence the stability and the range of motion of a reverse shoulder prosthesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A standard reverse shoulder prosthesis has been analysed. To perform virtual simulation of the shoulder-prosthesis assembly, all the components of the prosthesis have been acquired via a 3D laser scanner and the solid models of the shoulder bones have been reconstructed through CT images. Loads on the shoulder joint have been estimated using anatomical models database. A new virtual/numerical procedure has been implemented using a 3D parametric modelling software to find the optimal position of the glenosphere.

RESULTS

Several analyses have been performed using different configurations obtained by changing the glenoid component tilt and the lateral position of the glenosphere, modified through the insertion of a cylindrical spacer. For the analysed case study, it was found that the interposition of a spacer (between the baseplate and the glenoid) and 15° inferior tilt of the glenosphere allow improving the range of motion and the stability of the shoulder.

CONCLUSIONS

Some common complications of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty could be effectively reduced by a suitable positioning of the prosthesis components. In this work, using a new method based on virtual simulations, the influence of the glenosphere positioning has been investigated. An optimal configuration for the analysed case study has been found. The proposed approach could be used to find, with no in vivo experiments, the optimal position of a reverse shoulder prosthesis depending on the different dimensions and shape of the bones of each patient.

The effect of glenohumeral radial mismatch on different augmented total shoulder arthroplasty glenoid designs: a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

Augmented glenoid implants to correct bone loss can possibly reconcile current prosthetic failures and improve long-term performance for total shoulder arthroplasty. Biomechanical implant studies have suggested benefits from augmented glenoid components, but limited evidence exists on optimal design.

METHODS

An integrated kinematic finite element analysis (FEA) model was used to evaluate optimal augmented glenoid design based on biomechanical performance in translation in the anteroposterior plane similar to clinical loading and failure mechanisms with osteoarthritis. Computer-aided design software models of 2 different commercially available augmented glenoid designs-wedge (Equinox; Exactech, Inc., Gainesville, FL, USA) and step (STEPTECH; DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN, USA) were created according to precise manufacturer's dimensions of the implants. Using FEA, they were virtually implanted to correct 20° of retroversion. Two glenohumeral radial mismatches, 3.5/4 mm and 10 mm, were evaluated for joint stability and implant fixation simulating high-risk conditions for failure.

RESULTS

The wedged and step designs showed similar glenohumeral joint stability under both radial mismatches. Surrogate for micromotion was a combination of distraction, translation, and compression. With similar behavior and measurements for distraction and translation, compression dictated micromotion (wedge: 3.5 mm = 0.18 mm and 10 mm = 0.10 mm; step: 3.5 mm = 0.19 mm and 10 mm = 0.25 mm). Stress levels on the backside of the implant and on the cement mantle were higher using a step design.

DISCUSSION

Greater radial mismatch has the advantage of providing higher glenohumeral stability with tradeoffs, such as higher implant and cement mantle stress levels, and micromotion worse when using a step design.

Effect of the humeral neck-shaft angle and glenosphere lateralization on stability of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

Lateralizing the glenosphere and decreasing the humeral neck-shaft angles are implant design parameters that reduce the risk of scapular impingement. The effects of these parameters on joint stability remain unclear. This study evaluated the effect of glenosphere lateralization and humeral neck-shaft angle on joint stability by quantifying the anterior dislocation force in different arm positions.

METHODS

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty was performed on 19 human shoulder specimens. Anterior dislocation force and maximum external rotation were evaluated using a robot-based shoulder simulator. By varying the neck-shaft angle and magnitudes of glenosphere lateralization, 12 configurations were analyzed with the glenohumeral joint in 30° and 60° of abduction, in neutral, and in 30° of external rotation.

RESULTS

At 30° of abduction, measurements showed significantly higher dislocation forces for the 9-mm and 6-mm lateralized glenosphere than for the 0-mm (P < .0001, P = .007) nonlateralized glenosphere. At 60° of abduction, measurements showed significantly higher dislocation forces for the 9-mm and 6-mm lateralized glenosphere than for the 0-mm (P < .0001, P = .0007) and 3-mm (P = .0003, P = .04) glenosphere. Configurations with a neck-shaft angle of 135° showed significantly higher dislocation forces than configurations with a neck-shaft angle of 145° (P = .02) or 155° (P = .02) at 30° of abduction in 30° of external rotation. Neck-shaft angle and glenosphere lateralization had no influence on maximum external rotation capability.

CONCLUSION

Glenosphere lateralization significantly increased anterior stability of the glenohumeral joint without influencing the range of passive external rotation. The humeral neck-shaft angle only had a minor effect on anterior stability.

Impact of Modeling Assumptions on Stability Predictions in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is commonly used in the shoulder replacement surgeries for the relief of pain and to restore function, in patients with grossly deficient rotator cuff. Primary instability due to glenoid loosening is one of the critical complications of rTSA; the implants are designed and implanted such that the motion between the glenoid baseplate and underlying bone is minimized to facilitate adequate primary fixation. Finite element analysis (FEA) is commonly used to simulate the test setup per ASTM F2028-14 for comparing micromotion between designs or configurations to study the pre-clinical indications for stability. The FEA results can be influenced by the underlying modeling assumptions. It is a common practice to simplify the screw shafts by modeling them as cylinders and modeling the screw-bone interface using bonded contact, to evaluate micromotion in rTSA components. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of three different assumptions for modeling the screw-bone interface on micromotion predictions. The credibility of these modeling assumptions was examined by comparing the micromotion rank order predicted among three different modular configurations with similar information from the literature. Eight configurations were modeled using different number of screws, glenosphere offset, and baseplate sizes. An axial compression and shear load was applied through the glenosphere and micromotion at the baseplate-bone interface was measured. Three modeling assumptions pertaining to modeling of the screw-bone interface were used and micromotion results were compared to study the effect of number of peripheral screws, eccentricities, and baseplate diameter. The relative comparison of micromotion between configurations using two versus four peripheral screws remained unchanged irrespective of the three modeling assumptions. However, the relative comparison between two inferior offsets and baseplate sizes changed depending on the modeling assumptions used for the screw-bone interface. The finding from this study challenges the generally believed hypothesis that FEA models can be used to make relative comparison of micromotion in rTSA designs as long as the same modeling assumptions are used across all models. The comparisons with previously published work matched the finding from this study in some cases, whereas the comparison was contradicting in other cases. It is essential to validate the computer modeling approach with an experiment using similar designs and methods to increase the confidence in the predictions to make design decisions.

Does Humeral Component Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Affect Rotator Cuff Torque? Evaluation in a Cadaver Model

BACKGROUND

Humeral component lateralization in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) may improve the biomechanical advantage of the rotator cuff, which could improve the torque generated by the rotator cuff and increase internal and external rotation of the shoulder.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro biomechanical study was to evaluate the effect of humeral component lateralization (or lateral offset) on the torque of the anterior and posterior rotator cuff.

METHODS

Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders from eight separate donors (74 ± 8 years; six males, two females) were tested using an in vitro simulator. All shoulders were prescreened for soft tissue deficit and/or deformity before testing. A custom RTSA prosthesis was implanted that allowed five levels of humeral component lateralization (15, 20, 25, 30, 35 mm), which avoided restrictions imposed by commercially available designs. The torques exerted by the anterior and posterior rotator cuff were measured three times and then averaged for varying humeral lateralization, abduction angle (0°, 45°, 90°), and internal and external rotation (-60°, -30°, 0°, 30°, 60°). A three-way repeated measures ANOVA (abduction angle, humeral lateralization, internal rotation and external rotation angles) with a significance level of α = 0.05 was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Humeral lateralization only affected posterior rotator cuff torque at 0° abduction, where increasing humeral lateralization from 15 to 35 mm at 60° internal rotation decreased external rotation torque by 1.6 ± 0.4 Nm (95% CI, -0.07 -1.56 Nm; p = 0.06) from 4.0 ± 0.3 Nm to 2.4 ± 0.6 Nm, respectively, but at 60° external rotation increased external rotation torque by 2.2 ± 0.5 Nm (95% CI, -4.2 to -0.2 Nm; p = 0.029) from 6.2 ± 0.5 Nm to 8.3 ± 0.5 Nm, respectively. Anterior cuff torque was affected by humeral lateralization in more arm positions than the posterior cuff, where increasing humeral lateralization from 15 to 35 mm when at 60° internal rotation increased internal rotation torque at 0°, 45°, and 90° abduction by 3.2 ± 0.5 Nm (95% CI, 1.1-5.2 Nm; p = 0.004) from 6.6 ± 0.6 Nm to 9.7 ± 0.6 Nm, 4.0 ± 0.3 Nm (95% CI, 2.8-5.0 Nm; p < 0.001) from 1.7 ± 1.0 Nm to 5.6 ± 0.9 Nm, and 2.2 ± 0.2 Nm (95% CI, 1.4-2.9 Nm; p < 0.001) from 0.6 ± 0.6 Nm to 2.8 ± 0.6 Nm, respectively. In neutral internal and external rotation, increasing humeral lateral offset from 15 to 35 mm increased the internal rotation torque at 45˚ and 90˚ abduction by 1.5 ± 0.3 Nm (95% CI, 0.2-2.7 Nm; p = 0.02) and 1.3 ± 0.2 Nm (95% CI, 0.4-2.3 Nm; p < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Humeral component lateralization improves rotator cuff torque.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The results of this preliminary in vitro cadaveric study suggest that the lateral offset of the RTSA humeral component plays an important role in the torque generated by the anterior and posterior rotator cuff. However, further studies are needed before clinical application of these results. Increasing humeral offset may have adverse effects, such as the increased risk of implant modularity, increasing tension of the cuff and soft tissues, increased costs often associated with design modifications, and other possible as yet unforeseen negative consequences.

Glenoid morphology and the safe zone for protecting the suprascapular nerve during baseplate fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate glenoid morphology and define the safe zone for protecting the suprascapular nerve baseplate screw during baseplate fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in a Chinese population.

METHODS

Shoulder computed tomography (CT) scans from 56 subjects were retrospectively reviewed. Three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction was performed using Mimics software, and corresponding bony references were used to evaluate glenoid morphology. To standardize evaluation, the coronal scapular plane was defined. Safe fixation distances and screw placements were investigated by constructing a simulated cutting plane of the baseplate during RSA.

RESULTS

Mean glenoid height was 35.83 ± 2.95 mm, and width was 27.32 ± 2.78 mm, with significant sexual dimorphism (p < 0.01). According to the cutting plane morphology, the average baseplate radius was 13.84 ± 1.34 mm. The distances from the suprascapular notch and from two bony reference points at the base of the scapular spine to the cutting plane were 30.27 ± 2.77 mm, 18.39 ± 1.67 mm and 16.52 ± 1.52 mm, respectively, with a gender-related difference. Based on the clock face indication system, the danger zone caused by the suprascapular nerve projection was oriented between the two o'clock and eight o'clock positions in reference to the right shoulder.

CONCLUSIONS

Glenoid size and the safe zone for screw fixation during RSA were characterized in a Chinese population. Careful consideration of baseplate fixation and avoidance of suprascapular nerve injury are important for improved clinical outcome.