Femoral version: Comparison among advanced imaging methods

Discrepancies in Magnetic Resonance- and Computed Tomography-Based Femoral Version Measurements Despite Strong Correlations

PURPOSE

To determine the correlation and classification consistency of femoral version measurements between magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) using 4 commonly used measurement methods.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) who received preoperative CT and MR imaging assessment of the surgical hip and ipsilateral distal femur. Femoral version was measured using the Murphy method, the oblique method, the Reikerås method, and the Lee method. Intra- and inter-rater agreements were calculated. Linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis were performed for measurements using different imaging modalities and measurement methods. Femoral version measurements within the lower quartile, the middle 2 quartiles, and the upper quartile were classified into different groups based on their percentile within the sample population. Classification consistency rates between modalities and methods were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients (39.4 ± 9.1 years; 32 female) were included for analysis. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were high for all modalities and methods (intrarater intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] range, 0.963-0.993; inter-rater ICC range, 0.871-0.960). MR- and CT-based femoral version measurements showed strong correlations for all methods, with the Lee method demonstrating the strongest association (r = 0.904), while the oblique method exhibited the lowest correlation (r = 0.684) (all P < .001). MR-based measurements were smaller than CT-based measurements, with mean differences ranging from 4.5° to 10.3°. Classification consistency between MR and CT ranged from 51% to 74%, whereas the consistency between different measurement methods ranged from 68% to 85%.

CONCLUSIONS

While strong correlations were observed between MR- and CT-based femoral version measurements, MR-based measurements were significantly smaller than their CT counterparts. Classification consistency between the modalities was moderate to high. Measurements between different methods showed strong correlations with high consistency rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective case series.

Femoral anteversion linked to the inability to squat: Analysis of CT images in the patient and control groups

Many patients who cannot squat well in a neutral toe position can only squat in an excessively out-toeing position. This excessive out-toeing squat is thought to be caused by rotational problems of the lower extremities. In this study, we aimed to identify the cause for the inability to squat by measuring and comparing femoral and tibial torsion between an excessive out-toeing squat patient group and a control group representing the general population. Between 2008 and 2022, a patient group comprising 50 lower extremities with excessive out-toeing squats was established. A control group representing the general population was selected from patients aged 0 to 29 years, who underwent lower-extremity CT angiography between 2012 and 2022, using the Clinical Data Warehouse with exclusion criteria applied. A total of 94 lower extremities were included in the control group. The femoral torsional angle (FTA) and tibial torsional angle (TTA) of both groups were measured and compared using Student t test. Additionally, 30 each of those with the highest and lowest 30 FTA values were selected from the patient and control groups, and the TTA was compared between the high- and low-FTA groups using Student t test. The mean FTA was 0.34° (SD, 11.11°) in the patient group and 10.14° (SD, 11.85°) in the control group, with a mean difference of 9.8° and P < .001. The mean TTA was 27.95° (SD, 7.82°) in the patient group and 32.67 ° (SD, 7.58°) in the control group, with a mean difference of 4.72° (P = .001). The mean TTA was 34.3° (SD, 7.72°) in the high-FTA group and 28.17° (SD, 8.35°) in the low-FTA group, with a mean difference of 6.13° (P = .005). Patients with excessive out-toeing squat showed lower FTA and TTA values than the general population. Furthermore, although a correlation between FTA and TTA was not established through Pearson correlation analysis, a tendency was observed where a decrease in FTA was associated with a decrease in TTA. Based on these results, decreased FTA was demonstrated to be one of the major causes of excessive out-toeing squats.

Femoral neck version in the spinopelvic and lower limb 3D alignment: a full-body EOS® study in 400 healthy subjects

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to better understand the variation of femoral neck version according to spinopelvic and lower limb 3D alignment using biplanar X-rays in standing position.

METHODS

This multicentric study retrospectively included healthy subjects from previous studies who had free-standing position biplanar radiographs. Subjects were excluded if they presented spinal or any musculo-skeletal deformity, and reported pain in the spine, hip or knee. Age, sex, and the following 3D-reconstructed parameters were collected: spinal curvatures, pelvic parameters, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), spino-sacral angle (SSA), femoral torsion angle (FTA), sacro-femoral angle (SFA), knee flexion angle (KA), ankle angle (AA), pelvic shift (PS) and ankle distance. Femoral neck version angle (FVA) was calculated between horizontal plane projection of the bi-coxo-femoral axis and the line passing through the femoral neck barycenter and femoral head center. Analysis according to age subsets was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 400 subjects were included (219 females); mean age was 29 ± 18 years (range: 4-83). Subjects with high pelvic tilt values presented significantly higher FVA than average and low-PT individuals, respectively, 7.8 ± 7.1°, 2 ± 9° and 2.1 ± 9.5° (p < 0.001). These subjects also presented lower lumbar lordosis values and higher acetabulum anteversion in the horizontal plane than the two other groups. SVA correlation with FVA was weaker (r = 0.1, p = 0.03) than SSA and TPA (r = - 0.3 and r = 0.3, respectively, p < 0.001). A strong correlation was found with femoral torsion (r = 0.5, p < 0.001). SFA (r = - 0.3, p < 0.001), pelvic shift (r = 0.2, p < 0.001) and ankle distance (r = 0.3, p < 0.001) were also significantly correlated. Multivariate analysis confirmed significant association of age, pelvic tilt, lumbar lordosis, pelvic shift, ankle distance and femoral torsion with FVA.

CONCLUSION

Patients with lower lumbar lordosis present pelvic retroversion which induces a higher femoral neck version. This finding may help positioning implants in total hip replacement procedures. Higher pelvic shift, age, male gender and increased femoral torsion were also correlated with higher FVA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II (Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding).

Editorial Commentary: Femoral Version and Capsular Thickness Analysis in Hip Preservation Surgery-Surgical Indications Are as Important as Surgical Technique

Optimal treatment of patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome requires both thoughtful decision-making and skillful operative technique. Traditional evidence-based literature and routine clinical practice overemphasize the role of the alpha angle on the femoral side and lateral center edge angle on the acetabular side. Femoral and acetabular version are critical values that influence outcomes and warrant measurement and consideration. Without version analysis, an uniformed, possibly poor, decision may be made. The literature and clinical practice also place dichotomous emphasis on labral (torn/intact) and capsular (torn/intact) integrity, with minimal appreciation of the morphological details of both. Not all capsules are created equal. "Normal" capsule thickness is a nebulous concept, with thinner anterior capsules more prone to anterior instability. Intuitively, it biomechanically stands to reason that excessive femoral anteversion (and excessive anterior cranial and central acetabular version) would place additional stress on the anterior capsule. Excessive femoral anteversion is associated with a thinner anterior capsule. Whether the latter is a reactive process (implies causation) or simply 2 concordant metrics (only correlation) has yet to be determined. In patients with nonarthritic hip pain, comprehensive quantitative consideration of both femoral and acetabular version and capsular thickness determines the optimal hip preservation procedure. Surgical indications are as important as surgical technique.

The walls of the femoral neck as an auxiliary tool for femoral stem positioning

BACKGROUND

Femoral anteversion is a major contributor to functionality of the hip joint and is implicated in many joint pathologies. Accurate determination of component version intraoperatively is a technically challenging process that relies on the visual estimation of the surgeon. The following study aimed to examine whether the walls of the femoral neck can be used as appropriate landmarks to ensure appropriate femoral prosthesis version intraoperatively.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study based on 32 patients (64 hips) admitted to our centre between July and September 2020 who had undergone a CT scan of their lower limbs. Through radiological imaging analysis, the following measurements were performed bilaterally for each patient: anterior wall version, posterior wall version, and mid-neck femoral version. Anterior and posterior wall version were compared and evaluated relative to mid-neck version, which represented the true version value.

RESULTS

Mean anterior wall anteversion was 20° (95% CI, 17.6-22.8°) and mean posterior wall anteversion was -12° (95% CI, -15 to -9.7°). The anterior walls of the femoral neck had a constant of -7 and a coefficient of 0.9 (95% CI, -9.8 to -4.2; p < 0.0001; R² 0.77).The posterior walls of the femoral neck had a constant of 20 and a coefficient of 0.7 (95% CI, 17.8-22.5; p < 0.0001; R² 0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons can accurately obtain femoral anteversion by subtracting 7° from the angle taken between the anterior wall and the posterior femoral condyles or by adding 20° to the angle taken between the posterior wall and the posterior femoral condyles.

Femoral Version May Impact Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes in Select Patient Populations: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To provide further clarity regarding the management of patients with abnormal femoral version in the setting of hip arthroscopy and will discuss the definition of femoral version, the diagnostic and clinical evaluation of abnormal femoral version, and several described measurement techniques.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted in literature published before August 2021 that measured femoral version and reported patient-reported outcomes measures or rates of subsequent procedures following hip arthroscopy. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed and the electronic databases, PubMed, OvidMedLine, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. Two blinded reviews screened and evaluated data quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies were included with 11 studies reporting patient outcomes and 7 studies reporting rates of subsequent procedures. The most commonly used definition of femoral version was 5° to 20° of femoral anteversion. Computed tomography scan was the most commonly used imaging modality. The majority of studies (7 of 11) demonstrated that femoral version does not have an impact on patient-reported outcomes measures and is not predictive of clinically meaningful improvement scores. However, in select studies, patients with femoral retroversion were found to experience slightly inferior outcomes following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement. While femoral retroversion may be a risk factor for subsequent procedures, 3 of 7 studies refute this claim. Although in patients with borderline hip dysplasia, excessive femoral anteversion led to greater rates of subsequent hip procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

While the majority of studies show that femoral version does not have an impact on patient-reported outcomes following hip arthroscopy, those with femoral retroversion and with excessive anteversion with coexisting borderline hip dysplasia need to be educated on their increased risk of subsequent operation. Ultimately, this review suggests that clinical improvement can likely be achieved regardless of femoral version.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; systematic review of Level I-IV studies.

Correlation of femoral version measurements between computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging studies in patients presenting with a femoroacetabular impingement-related complaint

Computed tomography (CT) is considered the gold standard for femoral version measurement. However, recent data have shown magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as another modality to measure femoral version. This study aimed to correlate MRI and CT femoral version measurements in patients presenting with a femoroacetabular impingement (FAI)-related complaint. Patients (18-35 years old) who presented to the hip preservation clinic and radiology department with a suspected FAI diagnosis from 26 December 2018 to 4 March 2020 were included. All patients had a CT and MRI of the hip, with images including both hips and knees, as per our institution's protocol for possible hip preservation surgery. Patients were excluded if they were missing views of the knees, or if they had a history or imaging appearance of any condition affecting femoral version at the femoral head (e.g. slipped capital femoral epiphysis). Femoral version was measured by three reviewers. Fifty-eight patients were included, and 36 (62%) were female. Femoral version averaged 6.1° ± 11.8° on CT and 6.5° ± 10.8° on MRI. A strong positive correlation was reported between the two imaging modalities (r: 0.81; P < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability among the three reviewers was excellent and statistically significant for measurements on both MRI [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.95; 95% CI: 0.85, 0.99; P < 0.001] and CT (ICC: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.92, 0.99; P < 0.001). Our finding suggests that MRI is a sufficient method for measuring femoral version to determine disease etiology and treatment progression. To avoid exposing patients to ionizing radiation, physicians should not obtain CT scans to evaluate femoral version.

MRI quantification of femoral neck version using the posterior lesser trochanteric line: a comparison of three measurements

OBJECTIVE

To validate MRI for the quantification of the femoral neck version (FNV) using posterior lesser trochanteric Line (PLTL) and to compare reliability of the PLTL to the epicondylar and retrocondylar measurements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 3 T MRI scans performed for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Two musculoskeletal radiologists performed the measurements. MRI measurements of the PLTL were compared to CT using Bland Altman, Lin's concordance, and Lin's correlation coefficients. Interobserver reliability was determined using Bland Altman, Lin's concordance, and Lin's correlation coefficients. Intraobserver reliability was determined using Lin's concordance and Lin's correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients (90 lower extremities) met the inclusion criteria. Ages ranged from 20 to 41 years, with a mean of 31.5 years. There were 22 females and 23 males. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient for MRI and CT measurements of PLTL was substantial: 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.98). PLTL Lin's correlation coefficient was 0.825 (95% CI 0.732-0.918) and indicated good interobserver reliability. Epicondylar and retrocondylar methods Lin's correlation coefficients demonstrated moderate interobserver reliability at 0.601 (0.415-0.786) and 0.632 (0.456-0.807), respectively. There was moderate 95% confidence interval overlap between the PLTL and the other measurements. Bland-Altman plots for each measurement were similar and demonstrated no bias. There was excellent intraobserver reliability (> 0.900) with significant 95% confidence interval overlap.

CONCLUSION

MRI measurements of the PLTL are comparable to CT. The PLTL has good reliability between readers for the quantification of FNV using MRI, which could help avoid unnecessary radiation exposure using CT and reduce MRI scan time.

Generalized Joint Laxity Is Associated With Dynamic Hip Ultrasonography Measures in Female Athlete Patients Who Are Not Hypermobile

OBJECTIVES

To investigate ultrasound (US) femoroacetabular translation measurements in female athlete patients.

METHODS

A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in female athlete patients <50 years. Demographic data, Beighton score/hypermobility status, and sport participation were collected. Hip dysplasia was determined using radiographic measurements (lateral center edge angle, anterior center edge angle, Tönnis angle); femoral version angles were measured with CT or MR. Femoroacetabular translation US measures included neutral (N), neutral flexed (NF), extension external rotation/apprehension (EER) positions. Maximal difference (delta) between US measures was calculated.

RESULTS

206/349 female hips were analyzed (median age 21.2 years [range, 12-49.5]). The primary sport group was performing arts (45%, 92/206). Mean Beighton score was 5.2 (SD, 2.5) with 61% (129/206) of hips exhibiting hypermobility (Beighton score ≥5). For each additional unit of Beighton score, N US measurement increased by 0.7 mm (β = 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.22-1.25; P < .001), NF by 1 mm ( β = 0.9; 95% CI = 0.3-1.43; P = .002) and EER by 0.8 mm ( β = 0.8; 95% CI = 0.27-1.37; P < .001) when adjusting for age and dysplasia status. A positive correlation was detected between NF (r = 0.19; 95% CI = 0.05-0.33; P = .007) and EER (r = 0.19; 95% CI = 0.05-0.32; P = .01) with Tönnis angle and a negative correlation between the delta and femoral version (r = -0.20; 95% CI = -0.35 to 0.03; P = .02). No difference in US measures was detected across sport groups (N [P = .24], NF [P = .51], EER [P = .20], delta [P = .07]).

CONCLUSION

Beighton score was independently associated with dynamic US measures in female athlete patients who are not hypermobile when controlling for other factors.

Morphological Parameters of the Hip Joint and Its Relation to Gender, Joint Side and Age-A CT-Based Study

Background: Physiological reference values for morphological parameters of the hip (MPH) are of clinical importance for the treatment of painful, degenerated or fractured hip joints, as well as to detect morphological deformities, which could result in early osteoarthritis of the hip. Currently, sufficient data for MPH are lacking. Therefore, it remains unclear if age-dependent alterations in adult hip morphology are physiological and if there are side- and gender-dependent differences. The aim of the study was to analyze MPH according to gender, side and age in a large-scaled cohort by CT scans. Methods: A total of 1576 hip joints from 788 patients (female: 257, male: 531; mean age: 58.3 years (±18.9; 18−92 years)) were analyzed by CT. For all hips, acetabular anteversion (AcetAV); lateral centrum edge angle (LCE); acetabular index (AI); femoral neck version (FNV); centrum-collum-diaphyseal angle (CCD); and anterior alpha angle (AαA) were measured. Results: The mean values in this cohort were: AcetAV 20.5° (±6.9); LCE 40.8° (±8.8); AI 0.3° (±5.3); FNV 11.0° (±9.8); CCD 129.9° (±7.4); and AαA 41.2° (±7.7). There was a detectable side-specific difference for AcetAV (p = 0.001); LCE (p < 0.001); CCD (p < 0.001); and AαA (p < 0.001). All the analyzed parameters showed a significant gender-specific difference, except for AI (p = 0.37). There was a significant correlation between age and AcetAV (r = 0.17; p < 0.001); LCE (r = 0.39; p < 0.001); AI (r = −0.25; p < 0.001); CCD (r = −0.15; p < 0.001); and AαA (r = 0.09; p < 0.001), except FNV (p = 0.79). Conclusions: There are side-, gender- and age-specific alterations in hip morphology, which have to be considered in treating hip joint pathologies.

Assessment of Femoral Torsion on Magnetic Resonance Imaging is More Reliable Using Axial-Oblique Sequences Compared With Standard Axial Slices in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

PURPOSE

To determine the agreeability of femoral torsion measurements on axial and oblique axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS).

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS between January 2012 to January 2019 were identified. Inclusion criteria were all patients with an MRI scan containing the pelvis and knee imaging. MRI-based measurements of femoral torsion were performed on axial and oblique-axial slices by 2 raters, and inter-rater and intrarater reliability was assessed. Bland Altman plots were constructed to evaluate the agreeability between femoral torsion measurements performed using axial and oblique-axial slices. Bivariate correlation analyses were performed to assess the relationship between measurement methods on each respective scan. A linear regression was performed between measurements performed using axial and oblique-axial sequences.

RESULTS

A total of 164 patients were included. The mean true-axial and oblique axial femoral torsion were 12.2° ± 9.9° and 11.1° ± 9.2°, respectively. The intrarater reliability for axial and oblique-axial measurements were 0.993 and 0.997, respectively. The inter-rater reliability for axial and oblique-axial measurements were 0.925 and 0.965, respectively. The number of differences within the limits of agreement for axial and oblique-axial femoral torsion measurements was 58.54%. On Pearson correlation analysis, strong positive correlations were found between oblique-axial measurements at multiple time points (r = 0.994, P < .001), as well as axial measurements at multiple time points (r = 0.986, P < .001). A strong positive correlation was found between axial and oblique-axial measurements (r = 0.894, P < .001). A significant regression equation indicated that for each additional increase in axial femoral torsion, the oblique-axial femoral torsion increased 0.837 (95% confidence interval 0.772-0.901).

CONCLUSIONS

Femoral torsion values measured on oblique-axial sequences are smaller than on true-axial sequences. Femoral torsion measurements on axial and oblique-axial MRI sequences exhibit poor agreement. Oblique-axial sequences demonstrated greater measurement consistency at multiple timepoints. When evaluating torsional measurements, it is important to delineate which axial sequence was used, especially in patients with suspected severe femoral antetorsion. Standardization of MRI femoral version protocols within one's practice can ensure more consistent decision-making, especially in patients with suspected femoral antetorsion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective cohort, level III.

Femoral version deformities alter joint reaction forces in dysplastic hips during gait

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) causes hip instability and early-onset osteoarthritis. The focus on pathomechanics in DDH has centered on the shallow acetabulum, however there is growing awareness of the role of femoral deformities in joint damage. The objective of this study was to determine the influence of femoral version (FV) on the muscle and joint reaction forces (JRFs) of dysplastic hips during gait. Magnetic resonance images, in-vivo gait data, and musculoskeletal models were used to calculate JRFs and simulate changes due to varying FV deformities. Rotation about the long axis of the femur was added in the musculoskeletal models to simulate FV values from -5° (relative retroversion) to + 35° (increased anteversion). In our simulations, FV deformities caused the largest changes to the anteroposterior and resultant JRFs. From a normal FV of 15°, a 15° increase in femoral anteversion caused JRFs to be less posterior in early stance (Δ = 0.43 ± 0.22 xbodyweight) and more anterior in late stance (Δ = 0.60 ± 14 xbodyweight). Relative retroversion caused anteroposterior changes that were similar to anteversion in early stance but opposite in late stance. Resultant JRFs experienced the largest changes during late stance where anteversion raised the peak by 0.48 ± 0.15 xbodyweight and relative retroversion lowered the peak by 0.32 ± 0.30 xbodyweight. Increasing anteversion increased hip flexor and abductor muscle forces, which caused the changes in JRFs. Identifying how FV deformities influence hip joint loading can elucidate their role in the mechanisms of hip degeneration in patients with DDH.

Nonarthritic Hip Pathology Patterns According to Sex, Femoroacetabular Impingement Morphology, and Generalized Ligamentous Laxity

BACKGROUND

Sex differences are frequently encountered when diagnosing orthopaedic problems. Current literature suggests specific sex differences, such as a higher prevalence of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement syndrome in male patients and features of hip instability in female patients.

PURPOSE

To identify hip pathology patterns according to sex, alpha angle deformity, and generalized ligamentous laxity (GLL) in a nonarthritic patient population that underwent primary hip arthroscopy in the setting of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and labral tears.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy between February 2008 and February 2017 were included and separated into male and female groups for initial analysis. Patients were excluded if they had Tönnis osteoarthritis grade >1, previous ipsilateral hip surgery, or previous hip conditions. The demographics, radiographic findings, intraoperative findings, and surgical procedures were then analyzed and compared. Subanalyses were performed for both groups. A threshold of 1 SD above the mean alpha angle in the male group was used to create 2 subgroups. For female patients, GLL based on a Beighton score ≥4 was used to divide the group. Intraoperative findings were compared for both subanalyses.

RESULTS

A total of 2701 hips met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of those, 994 hips were in the male group and 1707 in the female group. The mean ± SD age was 36.6 ± 13.8 and 37.1 ± 15.0 years for the male and female groups, respectively(P = .6288). The average body mass index was significantly higher in the male group (P < .0001). GLL was more common in women (38.6%) than men (13.6%) (P < .001). The male group had a higher proportion of acetabular Outerbridge grade 3 (21.8%) and 4 (19.2%) lesions when compared with the female group (9.3% and 6.3%, respectively) (P < .0001). Men in the subgroup with an alpha angle ≥78° reported higher rates of acetabular Outerbridge grade 4 damage than men with an alpha angle <78° (P < .001). Mean lateral center-edge angle was lower in the female subgroup with Beighton score ≥4 vs <4 (23.7°± 4.2° vs 31.3°± 5.8°; P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

In this analysis of a large cohort of patients who underwent hip arthroscopy, 2 patterns of hip pathologies were related to sex. On average, male patients had larger alpha angles and increased acetabular chondral damage when compared with their female counterparts. Furthermore, a larger cam-type anatomy was associated with more severe acetabular chondral damage in men. In the female group, the incidence of features of hip instability such as GLL were significantly higher than in the male group.

Morphometric measurement of the proximal tibia to design the tibial component of total knee arthroplasty for the Thai population

Purpose

This study evaluates the morphology of the Thai proximal tibia based on three-dimensional (3D) models to design the tibial component.

Methods

The 3D models of 480 tibias were created using reverse engineering techniques from computed tomography imaging data obtained from 240 volunteers (120 males, 120 females; range 20–50 years). Based on 3D measurements, a digital ruler was used to measure the distance between the triangular points of the models. The morphometric parameters consisted of mediolateral length (ML), anteroposterior width (AP), medial anteroposterior width (MAP), lateral anteroposterior width (LAP), central to a medial length (CM), central to a lateral length (CL), medial anterior radius (MAR), lateral anterior radius (LAR), and tibial aspect ratio (AR). An independent t-test was performed for gender differences, and K-means clustering was used to find the optimum sizes of the tibial component with a correlation between ML length and AP width in Thai people.

Results

The average morphometric parameters of Thai proximal tibia, namely ML, AP, MAP, LAP, CM, and CL, were as follows: 72.52 ± 5.94 mm, 46.36 ± 3.84 mm, 49.22 ± 3.62 mm, 43.59 ± 4.05 mm, 14.29 ± 2.72 mm, and 15.28 ± 2.99 mm, respectively. The average of MAR, LAR, and AR was 24.43 ± 2.11 mm, 21.52 ± 2.00 mm, and 1.57 ± 0.08, respectively. All morphometric parameters in males were significantly higher than those of females. There was a difference between the Thai proximal tibia and other nationalities and a mismatch between the size of the commercial tibial component and the Thai knee. Using K-means clustering analysis, the recommended number of ML and AP is seven sizes for the practical design of tibial components to cover the Thai anatomy.

Conclusion

The design of the tibial component should be recommended to cover the anatomy of the Thai population. These data provide essential information for the specific design of Thai knee prostheses.

Artificial intelligence-based automatic assessment of lower limb torsion on MRI

Abnormal torsion of the lower limbs may adversely affect joint health. This study developed and validated a deep learning-based method for automatic measurement of femoral and tibial torsion on MRI. Axial T2-weighted sequences acquired of the hips, knees, and ankles of 93 patients (mean age, 13 ± 5 years; 52 males) were included and allocated to training (n = 60), validation (n = 9), and test sets (n = 24). A U-net convolutional neural network was trained to segment both femur and tibia, identify osseous anatomic landmarks, define pertinent reference lines, and quantify femoral and tibial torsion. Manual measurements by two radiologists provided the reference standard. Inter-reader comparisons were performed using repeated-measures ANOVA, Pearson’s r, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Mean Sørensen-Dice coefficients for segmentation accuracy ranged between 0.89 and 0.93 and erroneous segmentations were scarce. Ranges of torsion as measured by both readers and the algorithm on the same axial image were 15.8°–18.0° (femur) and 33.9°–35.2° (tibia). Correlation coefficients (ranges, .968 ≤ r ≤ .984 [femur]; .867 ≤ r ≤ .904 [tibia]) and ICCs (ranges, .963 ≤ ICC ≤ .974 [femur]; .867 ≤ ICC ≤ .894 [tibia]) indicated excellent inter-reader agreement. Algorithm-based analysis was faster than manual analysis (7 vs 207 vs 230 s, p < .001). In conclusion, fully automatic measurement of torsional alignment is accurate, reliable, and sufficiently fast for clinical workflows.

Is Advanced Imaging a Must in the Assessment of Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity?

Advanced imaging modalities have, in very recent years, enabled a considerable leap in understanding progressive collapsing foot deformity, evolving from a simple confirmation of clinical diagnostic using basic measurements to minute understanding of soft tissue and bone involvements. MRI and weight-bearing cone-beam computed tomography are enabling the development of new 3-dimensional measurement modalities. The identification of key articular and joint markers of advanced collapse will allow surgeons to better indicate treatments and assess chances of success with conservative therapies and less invasive surgical procedures, with the hope of improving patient outcomes.

Defining a new three-dimensional method for determining femoral torsional pathology in children

The purpose of this study was to compare 2D femoral torsional values to measurements made from 3D reconstructions, in pediatric patients with torsional pathology. Seventeen patients were included in this study. Femoral torsion was measured in 2D and 3D and compared using interclass correlation and Bland-Altman plots. The 2D and 3D measurements had excellent correlation (r > 0.79, P < 0.001). However, we found a fixed bias of -5.1 ± 11.3°, with 3D being consistently lower than 2D. This bias persisted when looking at only subjects with normal neck shaft angles. A proportional bias of 1.2 ± 7.8° was found when comparing 2D and 3D MRI measurements indicating that as the magnitude of the torsion changed, the difference between the two measurement techniques also changed. Given the proven accuracy of 3D reconstructions in the measurement of femoral torsion, clinicians should consider this method in pediatric patients with torsional pathology. Although 2D and 3D computed tomography (CT)/MRI torsional measurements correlate well, the presence of fixed and proportional biases indicates that the two methods cannot be used interchangeably. We submit that 3D reconstructed CT/MRI imaging, aligned along the mechanical axis, should be considered to assess femoral torsion in pediatric patients. Level of evidence: III Diagnostic Study.

Influence of Femoral Version on the Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement or Labral Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

It remains controversial whether abnormal femoral version (FV) affects the outcomes of hip arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) or labral tears.

PURPOSE

To review the outcomes of hip arthroscopic surgery for FAI or labral tears in patients with normal versus abnormal FV.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library were searched in July 2020 for studies reporting the outcomes after primary hip arthroscopic surgery for FAI or labral tears in patients with femoral retroversion (<5°), femoral anteversion (>20°), or normal FV (5°-20°). The primary outcome was the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and secondary outcomes were the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Hip Outcome Score-Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), failure rate, and patient satisfaction. The difference in preoperative and postoperative scores (Δ) was also calculated when applicable.

RESULTS

Included in this review were 5 studies with 822 patients who underwent hip arthroscopic surgery for FAI or labral tears; there were 166 patients with retroversion, 512 patients with normal version, and 144 patients with anteversion. Patients with retroversion and normal version had similar postoperative mHHS scores (mean difference [MD], 2.42 [95% confidence interval (CI), -3.42 to 8.26]; P = .42) and ΔmHHS scores (MD, -0.70 [96% CI, -8.56 to 7.15]; P = .86). Likewise, the patients with anteversion and normal version had similar postoperative mHHS scores (MD, -3.09 [95% CI, -7.66 to 1.48]; P = .18) and ΔmHHS scores (MD, -1.92 [95% CI, -6.18 to 2.34]; P = .38). Regarding secondary outcomes, patients with retroversion and anteversion had similar ΔNAHS scores, ΔHOS-SSS scores, ΔVAS scores, patient satisfaction, and failure rates to those with normal version, although a significant difference was found between the patients with retroversion and normal version regarding postoperative NAHS scores (MD, 5.96 [95% CI, 1.66-10.26]; P = .007) and postoperative HOS-SSS scores (MD, 7.32 [95% CI, 0.19-14.44]; P = .04).

CONCLUSION

The results of this review indicated that abnormal FV did not significantly influence outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery for FAI or labral tears.

Developing an Adaptive 3D Vertebrae Model of Scoliosis Patients for Customize Garment Design

Scoliosis is one of the most frequently occurring morphological problems in people. People with such an abnormal curve of the spine face a huge problem, not only from the medical point of view but also from that of garment design and production processes. The current paper brings a novel designing technique to develop an adaptive 3D model of the complicated anatomical shape of the human vertebrae using 3D digitization technologies. Even though it is not as accurate as scanning approaches, it is accurate enough for several applications, including visualization and constructing statistical shape models. Thus, the adaptive model will further integrate with the full skeleton and then to the body shapes of scoliosis patients, not only for an easy garment design process but also to produce comfortable and high-performance garments. The model has also the benefit of adjusting for each tissue to all kinds of spine parameters, such as the height and the angles of the bones and disks (especially the three characteristic planes: sagittal, coronal, and transverse). Thus, the full adaptive skeleton model and later its garment design system, considering the current adaptive vertebrae model for fitted, comfortable and well-performing scoliosis patients garment products, could be developed.

Reliability of Low-dose Biplanar Radiography in Assessing Pediatric Torsional Pathology

BACKGROUND

Low-dose biplanar radiographs (LDBRs) significantly reduce ionizing radiation exposure and may be of use in evaluating lower extremity torsion in children. In this study, we evaluated how well femoral and tibial torsional profiles obtained by LDBR correspond with 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance axial imaging (MRI) in pediatric patients with suspected rotational abnormalities.

METHODS

Patients who had both LDBR and CT/MRI studies performed for suspected lower extremity rotational deformities were included. Unlike previous publications, this study focused on patients with lower extremity torsional pathology, and bilateral lower extremities of 17 patients were included. CT/MRI torsion was measured using the Reikerås method, after conversion to 3D reconstructions. The LDBRs were deidentified and sent to the software division of EOS imaging, who created 3D reconstructions and evaluated each reconstruction for the torsional quantification of the femurs and tibiae. These imaging modalities were compared using correlation statistics and Bland-Altman analyses.

RESULTS

The mean age of the cohort was 12.1±1.7 years old. Torsional values of the femur were significantly lower in LDBRs versus 3D CT/MRIs at 17.7±15.1 and 23.3±17.3, respectively (P=0.001). Torsional values of the tibia were similar in LDBRs versus 3D CT/MRIs at 23.6±10.6 and 25.3±11.2, respectively (P=0.503). There was a good intermodality agreement between LDBR and 3D CT/MRI torsional values in the femur (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.807) and tibia (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.768). Bland-Altman analyses showed a fixed bias with a mean difference of -5.6±8.8 degrees between femoral torsion measurements in LDBRs versus 3D CT/MRIs (P=0.001); 15% (5/34) of femurs had a clinically significant measurement discrepancy. Fixed bias for LDBR measurements compared with 3D CT/MRIs for the tibia was not observed (P=0.193), however, 12% (4/34) of tibias had a clinically significant measurement discrepancy.

CONCLUSION

Although we found strong correlations between torsional values of the femur and tibia measured from LDBRs and 3D CT/MRIs, torsional values of the femur produced from LDBRs were significantly lower than values obtained from 3D CT/MRIs with some notable outliers.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Femoral derotational osteotomy level does not effect resulting torsion

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect on femoral torsion by rotational osteotomies at three different levels as measured in 3D using both the mechanical and the anatomic axes.

METHODS

Ten cadaveric lower extremities underwent femoral osteotomies perpendicular to the anatomic axis (AA) at three levels: subtrochanteric, mid-diaphyseal and supracondylar. Parallel pins were placed, one in each femur segment. Computed tomography (CT) was acquired in post-osteotomies neutral position, then post-external rotation of the femur at each osteotomy level. Femurs were returned to neutral rotation between imaging exams. Using 3D CT reconstructions, custom software calculated femoral torsion (angle between the femoral neck axis and the posterior condylar axis in the transverse plane) and pin angle between segments, reoriented to both the mechanical axis (MA) and the AA. Pin angle and torsion change were compared for the three osteotomy locations (regression analysis and ANOVA performed).

RESULTS

Two specimens were omitted (inadequate imaging); the remaining eight donors were 55-90 years old (mean: 64 ± 15 years), CT confirmed no bony defects. All three levels of osteotomy demonstrated significant correlations between the amount of rotation at the osteotomy (pin angle change) and the resulting change in femoral torsion (R square range 0.658-0.847). No significant differences were found between osteotomy level in torsion (MA:p = 0.285, AA:p = 0.156) or in pin angle (MA:p = 0.756, AA:p = 0.753).

CONCLUSIONS

Performing a corrective rotational osteotomy orthogonal to the AA achieves the desired effect on MA regardless of location. This suggests that a surgeon's osteotomy level choice may be based on other risks/benefits of the various techniques.

Does Femoral Retroversion Adversely Affect Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? A Midterm Analysis

PURPOSE

To report 5-year outcomes of arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome in patients with femoral retroversion compared with a control group of patients with normal femoral anteversion.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed for all patients who underwent hip arthroscopy between August 2008 and April 2013. Patients were included in analysis if they underwent hip arthroscopy during this period and had femoral version ≤0° calculated using magnetic resonance imaging. Exclusion criteria included prior ipsilateral hip conditions/surgeries or Tönnis grade >1. These patients were pair matched with patients having femoral anteversion between 10° and 20° based on gender, body mass index ± 10, and age ± 10 years. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively and annually thereafter. An a priori power analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 59 patients were identified as the experimental group out of 69 eligible for inclusion (86%). All 59 patients were matched, with a mean age of 37.4 years and mean body mass index of 26.9. Twenty patients were female, and 39 were male. These patients demonstrated significant improvement from their preoperative state in all patient-reported outcomes and visual analog score scores (P < .001). Thirty-eight patients met the threshold for minimal clinically important difference, and 35 achieved patient acceptable symptomatic state for the modified Harris Hip Score questionnaire. Seven patients converted to total hip replacement. No differences were noted between retroverted and control patients in any of the outcome measures collected, in pain or satisfaction ratings, in the frequency of or duration to secondary surgeries or in complication rate (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with femoral retroversion demonstrated significantly higher outcomes at minimum 5-year follow-up after undergoing arthroscopic hip surgery. These outcomes were not different from those of patients with normal femoral version. While femoral retroversion should not be considered a contraindication to hip arthroscopy, it should be carefully considered as a factor in patient selection and surgical planning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Editorial Commentary: Myth Buster-Is Femoral Retroversion a Contraindication to Hip Arthroscopy in Femoroacetabular Impingement?

Hip arthroscopy can effectively address cam and pincer impingement by reshaping bone prominences or bone edges. However, hip arthroscopy cannot be used to correct severe bone torsion abnormalities such as acetabular or femoral retroversion. As a result, some surgeons contraindicate hip arthroscopy in patients with femoral retroversion absent correction of the torsion abnormalities. However, recent research has suggested that hip arthroscopy absent osteotomy, with a focus on labral preservation and thorough correction of underlying cam and pincer bony abnormalities, achieves positive outcomes. Still, although femoral retroversion should not be considered a contraindication for hip arthroscopy, patients should be carefully counseled about residual symptoms.

Changes in Proximal Femoral Shape During Fetal Development

BACKGROUND

Walker and Goldsmith's classic article on fetal hip joint development reported that neck/shaft angle did not change from 12 weeks of gestational age through term while version increased from 0 to 40 degrees. This suggests no change in coronal alignment during development, a conclusion we dispute. By re-examining their data, we found that the true neck/shaft angle (tNSA) decreased by 7.5 degrees as version increased by 40 degrees from 12 weeks of gestational age to term.

METHODS

Four investigators measured both femoral version and neck-shaft angle from photographs published by the authors of femurs at multiple stages of maturation from 12 weeks of gestational age to term. The tNSAs and inclination angles were calculated for each femur illustrated using previously validated formula. Changes in the morphology of the femur over time were analyzed using a Student t test. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability were also determined by the Pearson R coefficient.

RESULTS

As reported by Walker and Goldsmith, apparent neck/shaft angle (aNSA) did not significantly change during maturation, whereas version increased by 40 degrees. However, tNSA decreased by 7.5 degrees during maturation, while the inclination increased by 32 degrees over the same period. This paper demonstrates angular changes in both the coronal and transverse planes with a 4:1 ratio of angular change in the transverse and coronal planes respectively. Interobserver Pearson coefficient R=0.98 and an intraobserver Pearson coefficient R=0.99.

CONCLUSIONS

Although Walker and Goldsmith reported angular changes only in the transverse plane, we conclude that they identified angular changes in both the coronal and transverse planes. Here we show it is mathematically necessary for tNSA to decrease, if aNSA remains constant as version increases.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A reader who is not well versed in the difference between aNSA and tNSA or version and inclination cannot appreciate what Walker and Goldsmith presented. Surgeons operating on the proximal femur also benefit from understanding these distinctions.

Medical information security in the era of artificial intelligence

In recent years, biometric technologies, such as iris, facial, and finger vein recognition, have reached consumers and are being increasingly applied. However, it remains unknown whether these highly specific biometric technologies are as safe as declared by their manufacturers. As three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction based on medical imaging and 3D printing are being developed, these biometric technologies may face severe challenges.