The Modic-endplate-complex phenotype in cervical spine patients: Association with symptoms and outcomes

The Association of Modic Changes and Disc-Endplate-Bone Marrow Complex Classification in Patients With Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease

STUDY DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association of Modic changes and DEBC classification in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease.

METHODS

The study includes 2 groups, neck pain patients presenting to the out-patient services (neck pain group) (n = 301) and polytrauma patients without cervical spine injury or a history of neck pain, who underwent whole spine MRI (control group) (n = 200). Degenerative changes in the MRI were classified according to the Modic changes (MC) and DEBC classification. Modifiers including End-Plate (EP) erosion and herniation (H+) presence were documented.

RESULTS

3612 EPs of 301 patients with neck pain and 2400 EPs of 200 controls were assessed. The incidence of MC and DEBC in the neck pain group was 20.93% and in the control group, it was 12%, (P < 0.05). In the neck pain group with DEBC changes, the distribution was Type A-6.51%; Type B-20.71%; Type C-71.6%; and Type D - 1.18%, while in the controls the distribution was Type A-10.29%, Type B-29.41%, Type C-54.41%, and Type D - 5.88%, The co-occurrence of H+ with DEBC in cases and controls was 13.95% vs 5.5% (P < 0.005). The odds ratio for the need for surgery was highest (OR: 6.8) when H+ and DEBC change co-occurred.

CONCLUSION

Our study highlights that patients with DEBC changes and disc herniation were more likely to experience neck pain and require surgical intervention, indicating the reliability and clinical significance of the DEBC classification in degenerative cervical spine patients.

A Strong Association Between Modic Changes Type 2 and Endplate Defects at Nonfused Segments After Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion

BACKGROUND

To determine the association between Modic changes (MCs) with other magnetic resonance imaging parameters and clinical symptoms of cervical degenerative disc disease.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of data on patients with cervical degenerative disc disease who underwent single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Preoperative demographic data (age, sex, surgical data) were collected, cervical magnetic resonance imaging parameters (disc degeneration grade, MCs, and endplate defects, each determined at each cervical level), and clinical data (numerical pain rating scale [NPRS] neck and arm, the Neck Disability Index) were compared to preoperative data.

RESULTS

The study included 121 patients at Visit 1 and 83 patients at Visit 2. The median follow-up duration was 26.5 [18.9; 33.1] months. Patients with MC had more intense NPRS-based neck pain before surgery compared to patients without MC (P = 0.001). There were significant changes in MC rate at the C5-C6 levels due to a significant number of new MC type 1 and MC type 2 (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively). MC type 2 was associated with disc degeneration, endplate defects, patients' age, and clinical scales (Neck Disability Index, NPRS) (P < 0.05). The endplate defects score threshold for predicting MC type 2 at the C3-C7 cervical levels was 5.

CONCLUSIONS

The factor predicting MC type 2 at the C3-C7 cervical levels is submaximal damage to the endplate. The MC rate is increased due to MC type 1 and MC type 2. MC types at the cervical levels may not represent consecutive stages of the same process.

Prevalence, risk factors, natural history, and prognostic significance of Modic changes in the cervical spine: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of 12,754 participants

OBJECTIVE

Modic changes (MCs) in the cervical spine are common, but remain an under-researched phenomenon, particularly regarding their prevalence, natural history, risk factors, and implications for surgical outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis endeavors to elucidate the multifactorial dimensions and clinical significance of cervical MCs.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive systematic search was performed using Medline (via PubMed), EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from their dates of inceptions to September 4, 2023. All identified articles were meticulously screened based on their relevance to our investigative criteria. Bias was assessed using quality assessments tools, including Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Diverse datasets encompassing MCs prevalence, demographic influences, risk factors, cervical sagittal parameters, and surgical outcomes were extracted. Meta-analysis using both random and common effects model was used to synthesis the metadata.

RESULTS

From a total of 867 studies, 38 met inclusion criteria and underwent full-text assessment. The overall prevalence of cervical MCs was 26.0% (95% CI: 19.0%, 34.0%), with a predominance of type 2 MCs (15% ; 95% CI: 0.10%, 0.23%). There was no significant difference between MCs and non-MCs in terms of neck pain (OR:3.09; 95% CI: 0.81, 11.88) and radicular pain (OR: 1.44; 95% CI: 0.64, 3.25). The results indicated a significantly higher mean age in the MC group (MD: 1.69 years; 95% CI: 0.29 years, 3.08 years). Additionally, smokers had 1.21 times the odds (95% CI: 1.01, 1.45) of a higher risk of developing MCs compared to non-smokers. While most cervical sagittal parameters remained unaffected, the presence of MCs indicated no substantial variation in pain intensity. However, a significant finding was the lower Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores observed in MC patients at the 3-month (MD: -0.34, 95% CI: -0.62, -0.07) and 6-month (MD: -0.40, 95% CI: -0.80, 0.00) postoperative periods, indicating a prolonged recovery phase.

CONCLUSION

This study found a predominant of type 2 MCs in the cervical spine. However, there was no significant mean difference between MCs and non-MC groups regarding neck pain and radicular pain. The results underscore the necessity for expansive, longitudinal research to elucidate the complexity of cervical MCs, particularly in surgical and postoperative contexts.

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty in Patients with Modic Change

OBJECTIVE

Modic change (MC) is defined as abnormalities observed in the intervertebral disc subchondral and adjacent vertebral endplate subchondral bone changes. Most studies on MC were reported in the lumbar spine and associated with lower back pain. However, MC has been rarely reported in the cervical spine, let alone in those who underwent cervical disc replacement (CDR). This study aimed to focus on MC in the cervical spine and reveal clinical and radiological parameters, especially heterotopic ossification (HO), for patients who underwent CDR. Furthermore, we illustrated the association between MC and HO.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent CDA from January 2008 to December 2019. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes. Radiological evaluations were used to conclude the cervical alignment (CL) and range of motion (ROM) of C2-7, functional spinal unit angle (FSUA), shell angle (SA), FSU height, and HO. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to identify the risk factors for HO. The Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method was used to analyze potential risk factors, and multivariate Cox regression was used to identify independent risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 139 patients were evaluated, with a mean follow-up time of 46.53 ± 26.60 months. Forty-nine patients were assigned to the MC group and 90 to the non-MC group. The incidence of MC was 35.3%, with type 2 being the most common. Clinical outcomes (JOA, NDI, VAS) showed no significant difference between the two groups. The differences in C2-7 ROM between the two groups were not significant, while the differences in SA ROM and FSUA ROM were significantly higher in the non-MC than in the MC group (p < 0.05). Besides, FSU height in MC group was significantly lower than that in non-MC group. Parameters concerning CL, including C2-7, FSUA, SA, were not significantly different between the two groups. The incidence of HO and high-grade HO, respectively, in the MC group was 83.7% and 30.6%, while that in the non-MC group was 53.3% and 2.2%, and such differences were significant (p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analyses and Cox regression showed that MC and involved level were significantly associated with HO occurrence (p < 0.05). No implant migration and secondary surgery were observed.

CONCLUSION

MC mainly affected the incidence of HO. Preoperative MC was significantly associated with HO formation after CDR and should be identified as a potential risk factor for HO. Rigorous criteria for MC should be taken into consideration when selecting appropriate candidates for CDR.

The disc-endplate-bone-marrow complex classification: progress in our understanding of Modic vertebral endplate changes and their clinical relevance

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The disc, endplate (EP), and bone marrow region of the spine form a single anatomical and functional interdependent unit; isolated degeneration of any one structure is rare. Modic changes (MC), however, are restricted to the subchondral bone alone and based on only T1 and T2 sequences of MRI. This results in poor reliability in differentiating fat from edema and hence may give a false impression of disease inactivity.

PURPOSE

To study the changes in disc, endplate, and bone marrow as a whole in degeneration and propose a classification based on the activity status of this complex with the addition of STIR MRI sequences.

STUDY DESIGN

Observational cohort.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients with isolated brain, cervical, or thoracic spine injury and patients with low back pain (LBP) who underwent MRI formed the control and study groups, respectively.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Demographic data, the prevalence of MC and disc-endplate-bone marrow classification (DEBC) changes, EPs undergoing reclassification based on DEBC, and comparison of the prevalence of MC, DEBC, H+modifier and DEBC with H+concordance between control and LBP group. The study determined the risk of LBP patients undergoing surgery as well as the incidence of postoperative infection based on DEBC changes. Significance was calculated by binomial test and chi-square test with the effect size of 0.3 to 0.5. Prevalence and association of outcome were calculated by Altman's odds ratio with the 95% CI and the scoring of z statistics. Logistic expression was plotted for independent variables associated with each class of both Modic and DEBC against dependent variables surgery and nonsurgery.

METHODS

Lumbar segments in both groups were assessed for MC types. The DEBC classification was developed with the addition of STIR images and studying the interdependent complex as a whole: type-A: acute inflammation; type-B: chronic persistence; type-C: latent and type-D: inactive. Modifier H+ was added if there was disc herniation. The classification was compared with MC and correlated to clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 3,560 EPs of 445 controls and 8,680 EPs in 1,085 patients with LBP were assessed. Four nonMC, 560 MC-II, and 22 MC-III EPs were found to have previously undetected edema in STIR (n=542) or hyperintensity in discs (n=44) needing reclassification. The formerly undescribed type-B of DEBC, representing a chronic persistent activity state was the most common (51.8%) type. The difference between the control and LBP of H+(12% vs 28.8%) and its co-occurrence with DEBC type 1.1% vs 23.3%) was significant (p<.0001). The odds ratio for the need for surgery was highest (OR=5.2) when H+ and DEBC type change co-occurred. Postoperative deep infection (as determined by CDC criteria) was 0.47% in nonDEBC, compared with 2.4% in patients with DEBC (p=.002), with maximum occurrence in type-B.

CONCLUSION

Classification based on the classic MC was found to need a reclassification in 586 EPs showing the shortcomings of results of previous studies. Considering the DEBC allowed better classification and better predictability for the need for surgical intervention and incidence of postoperative infection rate than MC.

Modic Changes of the Cervical and Lumbar Spine and Their Effect on Neck and Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the current literature and perform a meta-analysis on patients with cervical or lumbar spine Modic changes to determine if their baseline axial back pain and disability are comparable to patients without Modic changes.

METHODS

A systematic review of the PubMed database was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A meta-analysis was performed to compare the mean differences in back pain, leg pain, and disability based on the presence of cervical or lumbar spine Modic changes. A subgroup analysis of the different types of Modic changes was conducted to determine if Modic type affected back pain or disability.

RESULTS

- After review of 259 articles, 17 studies were included for meta-analysis and ten studies were included for qualitative synthesis. In the lumbar spine, 10 high-quality studies analyzed Visual Analog Scale (VAS) back pain, 10 evaluated VAS leg pain, and 8 analyzed Oswestry Disability Index. VAS back pain (mean difference (MD), -.38; 95% CI, -.61 - .16) and Oswestry disability index (MD -2.52; 95% CI, -3.93 - -1.12) were significantly lower in patients without Modic changes. Modic change subtype was not associated with differences in patient-reported outcomes. Patients with cervical spine Modic changes did not experience more severe pain than those without MC.

CONCLUSIONS

Modic changes in the lumbar spine are not associated with clinically significant axial low back pain severity or patient disability. Similar to the lumbar spine, Modic changes in the cervical spine are not associated with symptom severity, but they are associated with pain duration.

Evaluating Nonoperative Treatment for Low Back Pain in the Presence of Modic Changes: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to summarize and assess the current literature evaluating nonoperative treatments for patients with Modic changes (MCs) and low back pain (LBP).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The PubMed database was searched from its inception until May 1, 2022 for studies evaluating MC and clinical outcomes. Key findings, treatment details, and patient information were extracted from included studies. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies were included in this review, encompassing a total of 2452 patients, 1713 of whom displayed baseline MC. Seventy-eight percent of studies were high quality. Of included studies, 2 evaluated antibiotics, 5 evaluated steroid injections, 6 evaluated conservative therapies, and 5 evaluated other treatment modalities. Antibiotics and bisphosphonates improved treatment in patients with MC. Patients with MC without disc herniation benefited from conservative therapy, while those with Type I Modic changes and disc herniation experienced poorer improvement. Significant variability exists in reported outcomes following steroid injections.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonoperative therapy may provide patients with MC with significant benefits. Patients may benefit from therapies not traditionally utilized for LBP such as antibiotics or bisphosphonates, but conservative therapy is not recommended for patients with concomitant MC and disc herniation. The large variation in follow-up times and outcome measures contributes to significant heterogeneity in studies and inability to predict long-term patient outcomes. More long-term studies are needed to assess nonoperative treatments for LBP in patients with MC.

Endplate abnormalities, Modic changes and their relationship to alignment parameters and surgical outcomes in the cervical spine

Modic changes (MC) and endplate abnormalities (EA) have been shown to impact preoperative symptoms and outcomes following spinal surgery. However, little is known about how these phenotypes impact cervical alignment. This study aimed to evaluate the impact that these phenotypes have on preoperative, postoperative, and changes in cervical alignment in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). We performed a retrospective study of prospectively collected data of ACDF patients at a single institution. Preoperative magnetic resonance imagings (MRIs) were used to assess for the MC and EA. Patients were subdivided into four groups: MC-only, EA-only, the combined Modic-Endplate-Complex (MEC), and patients without either phenotype. Pre and postoperative MRIs were used to assess alignment parameters. Associations with imaging phenotypes and alignment parameters were assessed, and statistical significance was set at p < 0.5. A total of 512 patients were included, with 84 MC-only patients, 166 EA-only patients, and 71 patients with MEC. Preoperative MC (p = 0.031) and the MEC (p = 0.039) had significantly lower preoperative T1 slope compared to controls. Lower preoperative T1 slope was a risk factor for MC (p = 0.020) and MEC (p = 0.029) and presence of MC (Type II) and the MEC (Type III) was predictive of lower preoperative T1 slope. There were no differences in postoperative alignment measures or patient reported outcome measures. MC and endplate pathologies such as the MEC appear to be associated with worse cervical alignment at baseline relative to patients without these phenotypes. Poor alignment may be an adaptive response to these degenerative findings or may be a risk factor for their development.

Evaluating the Impact of Modic Changes on Operative Treatment in the Cervical and Lumbar Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Modic changes (MCs) are believed to be potential pain generators in the lumbar and cervical spine, but it is currently unclear if their presence affects postsurgical outcomes. We performed a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. All studies evaluating cervical or lumbar spine postsurgical outcomes in patients with documented preoperative MCs were included. A total of 29 studies and 6013 patients with 2688 of those patients having preoperative MCs were included. Eight included studies evaluated cervical spine surgery, eleven evaluated lumbar discectomies, nine studied lumbar fusion surgery, and three assessed lumbar disc replacements. The presence of cervical MCs did not impact the clinical outcomes in the cervical spine procedures. Moreover, most studies found that MCs did not significantly impact the clinical outcomes following lumbar fusion, lumbar discectomy, or lumbar disc replacement. A meta-analysis of the relevant data found no significant association between MCs and VAS back pain or ODI following lumbar discectomy. Similarly, there was no association between MCs and JOA or neck pain following ACDF procedures. Patients with MC experienced statistically significant improvements following lumbar or cervical spine surgery. The postoperative improvements were similar to patients without MCs in the cervical and lumbar spine.

ISSLS PRIZE in Clinical Science 2022: Epidemiology, risk factors and clinical impact of juvenile Modic changes in paediatric patients with low back pain

PURPOSE

It's a long-held belief that Modic changes (MC) occur only in adults, with advanced age, and are highly associated with pain and adverse outcomes. The following study addressed the epidemiology, risk factors and clinical relevance of MC in young paediatric patients.

METHODS

Two hundred and seven consecutive patients with no history of deformities, neoplasms, trauma, or infections were included in this ambispective study. MRIs were utilized to assess MCs and types, and other degenerative disc/endplate abnormalities. Subject demographics, duration of symptoms, clinic visits, conservative management (physical therapy, NSAIDs, opioids, injections) and surgery were noted.

RESULTS

The mean age was 16.5 years old (46.9% males), 14% had MCs and they occurred throughout the spine. Subject baseline demographics were similar between MCs and non-MCs patients (p > 0.05). Modic type 2 (50%) was the most common type (type 1:27.1%; type 3:18.8%; mixed:4.7%). Multivariate analyses noted that endplate damage (OR: 11.36), disc degeneration (OR: 5.81), disc space narrowing (OR: 5.77), Schmorl's nodes (OR: 4.30) and spondylolisthesis (OR: 3.55) to be significantly associated with MCs (p < 0.05). No significant differences in conservative management were noted between Modic and non-MCs patients (p > 0.05). Among surgery patients (n = 44), 21% also had MCs (p = 0.134). Symptom-duration was significantly greater in MC patients (p = 0.049).

CONCLUSION

Contrary to traditional dogma, robust evidence now exists noting that MCs and their types can develop in children. Our findings give credence to the "Juvenile" variant of MCs, whereby its implications throughout the lifespan need to be assessed. Juvenile MCs have prolonged symptoms and related to specific structural spine phenotypes.