Iterative cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for recurrent peritoneal metastases

Repeat cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM) are present in 10-20% of patients at the time of their initial cancer diagnosis, and affects over 20% of those who develop colorectal cancer recurrence. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with HIPEC is firmly established as the optimal surgical treatment, but there is very little known about the benefit of repeat or iterative CRS. The aim of this review is to provide a systematic evaluation of the perioperative complications, survival outcomes and quality of life in patients undergoing repeat CRS with HIPEC for CRPM.

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane databases was performed to identify all studies that reported outcomes for repeat CRS with or without HIPEC for CRPM.

RESULTS

Four hundred and ninety-three manuscripts were screened, and 15 retrospective studies were suitable for inclusion. Sample sizes ranged from 2 to 30 participants and comprised a total of 229 patients. HIPEC was used in all studies, but exact rates were not consistently stated. Perioperative morbidity was reported in four studies, between 16.7% and 37.5%. Nine studies reported mortality rate which was consistently 0%. The median overall survival after repeat CRS ranged from 20 to 62.6 months. No studies provided quality of life metrics.

CONCLUSION

Repeat CRS for CRPM has perioperative morbidity and mortality rates comparable to initial CRS, and offers a potential survival benefit in selected patients. There is however limited high-quality data in the literature.

The contemporary management of peritoneal metastasis: A journey from the cold past of treatment futility to a warm present and a bright future

Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is often regarded as a less frequent pattern of spread; however, collectively across all spectra of primary tumors, the consequences of PM impact a large population of patients annually. Unlike other modes of metastasis, symptoms at presentation or during the treatment course are common, representing an additional challenge in the management of PM. Early efforts with chemotherapy and incomplete surgical interventions transiently improved symptoms, but durable symptom control and survival extension were rare, which established a perspective of treatment futility for PM through most of the 20th century. Notably, the continued development of better systemic therapy combinations, optimization of cytoreductive surgery (CRS), and rigorous investigation of combining regional therapy-specifically hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy-with CRS, have resulted in more effective multimodal treatment options for patients with PM. In this article, the authors provide a comprehensive review of the data establishing the contemporary approach for tumors with a high frequency of PM, including appendix, colorectal, mesothelioma, and gastric cancers. The authors also explore the emerging role of adding hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy to the well established paradigm of CRS and systemic therapy for advanced ovarian cancer, as well as the recent clinical trials identifying the efficacy of poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase maintenance therapy. Finally, recent data are included that explore the role of precision medicine technology in PM management that, in the future, may help further improve patient selection, identify the best systemic therapy regimens, detect actionable mutations, and identify new targets for drug development.

Repeat Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Cancers with Peritoneal Metastasis: A 30-year Institutional Experience

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) improves survival in abdominal cancer patients with metastatic disease limited to the peritoneal cavity. Patients are increasingly being offered repeat CRS-HIPECs for peritoneal recurrence. However, in this rare clinical scenario, the survival benefit of performing repeat CRS-HIPEC operations remains unclear.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the CRS-HIPEC database at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center was performed over a 30-year timespan. From 1547 patients with appendix cancers, colorectal cancers, mesotheliomas, and other miscellaneous cancers, 156 received more than one CRS-HIPEC. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed using overall survival (OS) from the time of surgery as the primary endpoint. Multi-variable Cox proportional hazards regression modelling was performed on pertinent clinical variables.

RESULTS

Patients who received multiple CRS-HIPECs had significantly better median OS (10.7 years) versus those who received one CRS-HIPEC (2.5 years), with appendix cancers faring best (12.9 years). Resection status R2a or better was achieved in 76.4% of repeat CRS-HIPECs. There were no significant changes in complication rates after repeat CRS-HIPEC. On multivariate analysis of repeat CRS-HIPEC, patients with appendix and colorectal cancers, heart disease, and poor functional status were independently associated with poor OS. Factors not independently associated with OS were age, sex, body mass index, race, diabetes, lung disease, smoking history, and systemic chemotherapy between CRS-HIPECs.

CONCLUSIONS

Performing multiple CRS-HIPEC operations on appropriate surgical candidates may significantly prolong survival. Appendix cancers derived the greatest benefit. Satisfactory resection margins and complication rates are comparable to first cases and achievable in repeat CRS-HIPEC procedures.

Timing of Repeat Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Recurrent Low-Grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) with peritoneal involvement is a common indication for cytoreductive surgery with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC). With peritoneal recurrence, patients are increasingly being offered repeat CRS/HIPECs, however optimal timing for a second CRS/HIPEC remains unknown.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained 30-year database at our high-volume HIPEC center was analyzed retrospectively for patients with LAMNs and peritoneal recurrence receiving one or two CRS/HIPECs. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, linear regression modeling, and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 143 patients with LAMNs who underwent CRS/HIPECs had confirmed postoperative peritoneal recurrence. Of these patients, 85 underwent one CRS/HIPEC and 58 underwent two CRS/HIPECs. The groups had significant differences in age, with younger patients more likely to undergo a second CRS/HIPEC (48.5 vs. 58.0 years; p < 0.001). The median overall survival (OS) for the group undergoing two CRS/HIPECs was approximately four times longer compared with the group undergoing one CRS/HIPEC (227.1 vs. 54.5 months; p < 0.0001). The time from recurrence to the second CRS/HIPEC was not significantly associated with OS from the time of the first operation. Instead, a shorter time between the first CRS/HIPEC and recurrence was significantly associated with shorter OS from the time of the first operation (p = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

In peritoneal LAMNs with recurrence, receiving two CRS/HIPECs was associated with better OS compared with receiving one CRS/HIPEC. Longer time to recurrence was a good prognostic factor. Delay between recurrence and second CRS/HIPEC had no apparent impact on OS from the first CRS/HIPEC; thus, immediate or delayed reoperative intervention are both reasonable approaches.

Repeated cytoreductive surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis: A retrospective cohort study

Introduction

The prognosis of abdominal cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is poor. In literature, some authors described a repeated Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with recurrent PC as feasible for overall survival improvement. Hence, we implemented this approach at our hospital and analyzed our cases.

Methods

A unicentric retrospective observational study took place at the Helios hospital Berlin-Buch in 2020. The data of individuals who received a HIPEC in the time of 2007-2019 were extracted. The data were entered in the HIPEC database of the German Society of General and Visceral Surgery (StuDoQ|HIPEC, German society for general and visceral surgery). The primary objective was the overall survival after first HIPEC procedure.

Results

A total of 292 data files from were extracted and 14 patients were identified as eligible for further analysis (7× colorectal, 3x gastric, 1× appendix cancer, 1× cancer of unknown primary, 1× Mesothelioma, 1× Pseudomyxoma peritonei). The mean age was 57 (8) years. The BMI was on average 23.5 (3.5) kg/m². A total of 8 individuals were female and 6 male (6xASA-Score I, 8xASA-Score II). The initial Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) was on average 11.5 (9.1). The average overall survival after 1. HIPEC for colonic cancer was 74 months (n = 3; 43, 70 and 90 month), for gastric cancer 29 months (n = 2; 19 and 39 month) and for mesothelioma 44 months (n = 1).

Conclusions

Based on our findings Repeated Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy may improve overall survival of selected patients suffering from peritoneal carcinomatosis.

The effect of intraperitoneal administration of BromAc on blood parameters: phase 1 study

Intraperitoneal administration of BromAc (bromelain + acetylcysteine) is currently undergoing a phase 1 clinical trial for pseudomyxoma peritonei at our institution. This study reports on analysis of routine blood parameters before and after treatment for a series of 25 patients in this trial. Blood parameters assessed included full blood count, electrolytes, urea, and creatinine, liver function tests, coagulation studies, as well as inflammatory markers (CRP). Certain parameters such as CRP, and white cell count, were significantly elevated after treatment whilst serum albumin level was reduced indicating an inflammatory reaction. However, liver enzymes, coagulation studies, and other parameters were not affected. Therefore, there are no additional safety signals evident upon analysis of routine blood parameter testing.

Repeat Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Recurrences is Safe and Efficacious

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) for colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases (CRPM) is associated with improved survival in patients with historically dismal prognosis. Nonetheless, peritoneal recurrences remain common and represent a difficult challenge in these patients' management. Repeat CRS/HIPEC is associated with even greater morbidity and its survival benefit has not yet been clearly demonstrated.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively maintained database and aimed to assess the safety and oncological efficacy of repeat CRS/HIPEC.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-two patients underwent an initial CRS/HIPEC, whereas 30 subsequently had repeat CRS/HIPEC for CRPM. Groups were similar in demographics, comorbidities, and peritoneal cancer index (PCI). No significant difference in morbidity, hospital stay, or reoperation rate was noted between initial and repeat procedures. Patients who underwent repeat CRS/HIPEC had a median overall survival of 68 months versus 51 months in patients who did not undergo repeat procedure for their peritoneal recurrence (p = 0.03). Disease-free survival (DFS) in patients after repeat and after initial procedure were similar with median of 9.6 versus 12 months, respectively (p = 0.083). Univariate analysis demonstrated that PCI, DFS, and repeat procedure displayed significant factors on outcomes in patients with peritoneal recurrences, whereas PCI > 16 and DFS remained independent predictors on multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis, which represents the largest series to date of repeat CRS/HIPEC for CRPM, indicates that this approach as a part of multimodal therapy is both safe and efficacious in appropriately selected patients.

A novel treatment of bromelain and acetylcysteine (BromAc) in patients with peritoneal mucinous tumours: A phase I first in man study

BACKGROUND

Bromelain (Brom) and Acetylcysteine (Ac) have synergistic activity resulting in dissolution of tumour-produced mucin both in vitro and in vivo. The aim of this study was to determine whether treatment of mucinous peritoneal tumour with BromAc can be performed with an acceptable safety profile and to conduct a preliminary assessment of efficacy in a clinical setting.

METHODS

Under radiological guidance, a drain was inserted into the tumour mass or intraperitoneally. Each patient could have more than one tumour site treated. Brom 20-60 mg and Ac 1·5-2 g was administered in 5% glucose. At 24 h, the patient was assessed for symptoms including treatment-related adverse events (AEs) and the drain was aspirated. The volume of tumour removed was measured. A repeat dose via the drain was given in most patients. All patients that received at least one dose of BromAc were included in the safety and response analysis.

FINDINGS

Between March 2018 and July 2019, 20 patients with mucinous tumours were treated with BromAc. Seventeen (85%) of patients had at least one treatment-emergent AE. The most frequent treatment-related AEs were CRP rise (n = 16, 80%), WCC rise (n = 11, 55%), fever (n = 7, 35%, grade I) and pain (n = 6, 30%, grade II/III). Serious treatment-related AEs accounted for 12·5% of all AEs. There were no anaphylactic reactions. There were no deaths due to treatment-related AEs. An objective response to treatment was seen in 73·2% of treated sites.

CONCLUSION

Based on these preliminary results and our preclinical data, injection of BromAc into mucinous tumours had a manageable safety profile. Considerable mucolytic activity was seen by volume of mucin extracted and radiological appearance. These results support further investigation of BromAC for patients with inoperable mucinous tumours and may provide a new and minimally invasive treatment for these patients.

Repeat Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Is Not Associated with Prohibitive Complications: Results of a Multiinstitutional Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is offered to select patients with peritoneal metastases. In instances of recurrence/progression, a repeat CRS/HIPEC may be considered. The perioperative morbidity and the potential oncologic benefits are not well described.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of a multiinstitutional database to assess the perioperative outcomes following repeat CRS/HIPEC (repeat). Kaplan-Meier and Cox estimates were used to assess survival.

RESULTS

In the entire cohort, 2157 patients were analyzed, with 158 (7.3%) in the repeat cohort. The rate of complete cytoreduction was 89.8% versus 83.0% in initial versus repeat groups. The overall incidence of major complications was similar (26.3% vs. 30.7%); however, reoperation was more common in the repeat group. Perioperative outcomes such as length of stay and nonhome discharge were not significantly different. For the entire cohort, 5-year overall survival (OS) was 56.0% in the initial group and 59.5% in the repeat group. In patients with only appendiceal cancer, we observed a 5-year OS of 64.0% in the initial group compared with 67.3% in the repeat cohort. For patients with appendiceal cancer who developed a recurrence/progression, median OS was 36 months in the no repeat operation group compared with 73 months for those that did. Multivariable regression demonstrated that completeness of cytoreduction and tumor grade were associated with OS, but repeat operation was not.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat CRS/HIPEC is not associated with prohibitive risk. Survival is possibly improved, and therefore, repeat operation should be considered in selected patients with recurrent or progressive disease.

Chicago Consensus Working Group. The Chicago Consensus on peritoneal surface malignancies: Management of appendiceal neoplasms

The Chicago Consensus Working Group provides multidisciplinary recommendations for the management of appendiceal neoplasms specifically related to the management of peritoneal surface malignancies. These guidelines are developed with input from leading experts, including surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, palliative care physicians, and pharmacists. These guidelines recognize and address the emerging need for increased awareness in the appropriate management of peritoneal surface disease. They are not intended to replace the quest for higher levels of evidence.

Chicago Consensus Working Group. The Chicago Consensus on Peritoneal Surface Malignancies: Management of Appendiceal Neoplasms

The Chicago Consensus Working Group provides multidisciplinary recommendations for the management of appendiceal neoplasms specifically related to the management of peritoneal surface malignancies. These guidelines are developed with input from leading experts including surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, palliative care physicians, and pharmacists. These guidelines recognize and address the emerging need for increased awareness in the appropriate management of peritoneal surface disease. They are not intended to replace the quest for higher levels of evidence.

Repeat cytoreductive surgery with or without intraperitoneal chemotherapy for recurrent epithelial appendiceal neoplasms

Background

With recurrence rates after primary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in excess of 50 per cent, repeat CRS is being performed increasingly, but survival outcomes have not been reported widely. This study examined the outcomes following repeat CRS for appendiceal cancer with peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM), and evaluated its feasibility and safety.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of patients who had surgery between 1996 and 2018 were analysed. Patients who underwent a single CRS procedure with or without heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) were compared with those who had multiple procedures with or without HIPEC. Perioperative morbidity and survival outcomes were analysed.

Results

Some 462 patients were reviewed, 102 of whom had repeat procedures. For high‐grade tumours, patients who had a single CRS procedure had significantly reduced overall survival (OS) compared with those who had repeat CRS (55·6 versus 90·7 months respectively; P = 0·016). For low‐grade tumours, there was no difference in OS (P = 0·153). When patients who had a single procedure were compared with those who had multiple procedures, there was no significant difference in major morbidity (P = 0·441) or in‐hospital mortality (P = 0·080). For multiple procedures, no differences were found in major morbidity (P = 0·262) or in‐hospital mortality (P = 0·502) when the first procedure was compared with the second. For low‐grade cancers, the peritoneal carcinomatosis index was a significant prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio (HR) 1·11, 95 per cent c.i. 1·05 to 1·17; P < 0·001), whereas for high‐grade cancers repeat CRS (HR 0·57, 0·33 to 0·95; P = 0·033), complete cytoreduction score (HR 1·55, 1·01 to 2·40; P = 0·046) and presence of signet ring cells (HR 2·77, 1·78 to 4·30; P < 0·001) were all significant indicators of long‐term survival.

Conclusion

In selected patients presenting with PSM from epithelial appendiceal neoplasms, repeat CRS performed in high‐volume centres could provide survival benefits.

Optimal Surveillance Frequency After CRS/HIPEC for Appendiceal and Colorectal Neoplasms: A Multi-institutional Analysis of the US HIPEC Collaborative

BACKGROUND

No guidelines exist for surveillance following cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) for appendiceal and colorectal cancer. The primary objective was to define the optimal surveillance frequency after CRS/HIPEC.

METHODS

The U.S. HIPEC Collaborative database (2000-2017) was reviewed for patients who underwent a CCR0/1 CRS/HIPEC for appendiceal or colorectal cancer. Radiologic surveillance frequency was divided into two categories: low-frequency surveillance (LFS) at q6-12mos or high-frequency surveillance (HFS) at q2-4mos. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Among 975 patients, the median age was 55 year, 41% were male: 31% had non-invasive appendiceal (n = 301), 45% invasive appendiceal (n = 435), and 24% colorectal cancer (CRC; n = 239). With a median follow-up time of 25 mos, the median time to recurrence was 12 mos. Despite less surveillance, LFS patients had no decrease in median OS (non-invasive appendiceal: 106 vs. 65 mos, p < 0.01; invasive appendiceal: 120 vs. 73 mos, p = 0.02; colorectal cancer [CRC]: 35 vs. 30 mos, p = 0.8). LFS patients had lower median PCI scores compared with HFS (non-invasive appendiceal: 10 vs. 19; invasive appendiceal: 10 vs. 14; CRC: 8 vs. 11; all p < 0.01). However, on multivariable analysis, accounting for PCI score, LFS was still not associated with decreased OS for any histologic type (non-invasive appendiceal: hazard ratio [HR]: 0.28, p = 0.1; invasive appendiceal: HR: 0.73, p = 0.42; CRC: HR: 1.14, p = 0.59). When estimating annual incident cases of CRS/HIPEC at 375 for non-invasive appendiceal, 375 invasive appendiceal and 4410 colorectal, LFS compared with HFS for the initial two post-operative years would potentially save $13-19 M/year to the U.S. healthcare system.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-frequency surveillance after CRS/HIPEC for appendiceal or colorectal cancer is not associated with decreased survival, and when considering decreased costs, may optimize resource utilization.

Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: clinical aspects, and therapeutic perspectives

Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare disease with a wide clinical spectrum. It arises from the peritoneal lining and commonly presents with diffuse, extensive spread throughout the abdomen and, more rarely, metastatic spread beyond the abdominal cavity. Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and positron-emission tomography are important diagnostic tools used for the preoperative staging of MPM. The definitive diagnosis is based on histopathological analysis, mainly via immunohistochemistry. In this regard, paired-box gene 8 negativity represents a useful diagnostic biomarker for differentiating MPM from ovarian carcinoma. In addition, BRCA1-associated protein-1 (BAP1) loss is specific to MPM and allows it to be distinguished from both benign mesothelial lesions and ovarian serous tumors. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has become an increasingly important therapeutic approach, while systemic therapies are still being developed. Histology, Ki-67, completeness of cytoreduction, age, sex, and baseline thrombocytosis are commonly used to optimize patient selection for CRS with HIPEC. Additionally, it is well recognized that, compared to other subtypes, an epithelial morphology is associated with a favorable prognosis, whereas baseline thrombocytosis predicts an aggressive biologicalbehavior. Platelets and other immunologic cytokines have been evaluated as potential novel therapeutic targets. Epigenetic modifiers, including BAP1, SETD2 and DDX3X, are crucial in mesothelial tumorigenesis and provide opportunities for targeted treatment. Overexpression of the closely interacting phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathways appears crucial in regulation of the malignant phenotype. The use of targeted therapies with PI3K-mTOR-based inhibitors requires further clinical assessment as a novel approach.

Repeat cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for recurrent peritoneal carcinomatosis of appendiceal origin

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to clarify the role of repeat cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC) in the management of recurrent peritoneal carcinomatosis of appendiceal origin.

METHODS

Data were retrieved on 42 patients who underwent CRS + HIPEC; 29 repeat surgical procedures were performed in 13 patients.

RESULTS

Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 12 of 13 patients by the second CRS. Repeat recurrence was detected in 11 patients, eight of whom underwent a third CRS. The peritoneal cancer index decreased from initial CRS to repeat CRS but was still higher than 18 in nine patients at the second CRS. Preoperative chemotherapy was given to three patients with early recurrence. Grade 3-5 morbidity and 90-day mortality were not significantly different between initial and repeat CRS. Five-year survival rates after first and second CRS were 75.5 and 67.7%, respectively. Complete cytoreduction at second CRS was a significant prognostic factor. Among patients with recurrence after the second CRS, patients who underwent a third CRS showed a better prognosis than those who did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat CRS is oncologically beneficial, and the morbidity rate was as high as that of initial CRS. Complete cytoreduction was the key to successful long-term results. Although further recurrence was common, aggressive resection was useful, even in cases of diffuse recurrence.

Repeat cytoreductive surgery with or without perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal surface malignancy

BACKGROUND

A significant proportion of patients with peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) experienced recurrence after initial cytoreductive surgery (CRS). Thus the aims of this study were to determine short-term outcomes and long-term survivals associated with repeat CRS.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data of consecutive patients with PSM who underwent CRS by one surgical team at St George Hospital in Sydney, Australia between Jan 1996 and May 2016.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in hospital mortality (p=0.343) and major morbidity rate (p=0.454). Patients who underwent repeat surgery had a significantly higher 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (p<0.001) and a longer median disease free interval (DFS) (p<0.001). Repeat CRS was also found to be a significant prognostic factor for OS (p<0.001) and DFS (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat CRS with or without perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy could provide long-term survival benefits to patients with PSM with acceptable mortality and morbidity rates.

SUMMARY

1. Repeat CRS with or without PIC provides long-term survival benefits to patients with PSM. 2. Repeat CRS with or without PIC is feasible and can be performed without acceptable mortality and morbidity rates.

Strategies to prevent peritoneal carcinomatosis arising from colorectal cancer

In the last decades, cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy became a curative option for peritoneal metastases in selected patients, otherwise considered for palliative therapy alone. Better knowledge of physiopathology of peritoneal spread and identification of predictive factors for peritoneal relapse prompted specialized centers to investigate the role of a 'proactive approach' in order to early detect peritoneal metastasis. These encouraging data could justify an active attitude in selected patients at high risk of peritoneal recurrence after curative resection of primary tumor. Selection criteria and the timing of complementary hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy remain important points of discussion. In this article, we will discuss treatment principles and future perspectives to early treat and, if possible, to prevent peritoneal dissemination after curative treatment of colorectal cancer.

Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy and Cytoreductive Surgery in the Management of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

BACKGROUND

Malignant peritoneal disease can lead to significant debility due to bowel obstructions, ascites, and cancer cachexia. Moreover, inadequate imaging techniques can lead to the suboptimal detection of disease, and the poor vascularity of tumors can lead to a poor response to systemic chemotherapy. However, combination cytoreductive surgery/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a promising novel treatment for patients with this disease.

METHODS

The medical literature focusing on diagnostic updates and the management of peritoneal disease was reviewed. The application principles of HIPEC for use in peritoneal disease were also summarized.

RESULTS

Improvements in imaging and the application of laparoscopic techniques have significantly increased the rate of diagnosis of early peritoneal disease with consequently less morbid cytoreductive procedures. Appropriate patient selection based on prognostic scores along with complete cytoreduction can identify a cohort of patients likely to derive durable benefit from this combination treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Advances in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques, including surgical cytoreductive techniques, have demonstrated significant survival gains in patients with peritoneal disease. Although HIPEC can be used for the management of various types of histologies, further development of high-level evidence is necessary to advance the field.

Repeat cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: review of indications and outcomes

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an established treatment option in selected patients with peritoneal dissemination from a variety of epithelial primaries. Even though a small proportion will be alive and potentially cured at 10 years, the majority will eventually develop recurrent disease. Repeat CRS/HIPEC is a valid consideration in a selected subpopulation of patients with isolated peritoneal recurrence. This review summarizes the data on patient selection, feasibility, limitations and outcomes of repeat CRS/HIPEC.

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a review of factors contributing to morbidity and mortality

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is associated with prolonged survival for appropriately selected patients with peritoneal dissemination of abdominal malignancies. CRS and HIPEC has been criticized for perceived high rates of morbidity and mortality. Morbidity and mortality rates of CRS and HIPEC, however, do not appear dissimilar to those of other large abdominal surgeries, particularly when relevant patient and operative factors are accounted for. The risk of morbidity and mortality following this surgery for a given individual can be predicted in part by a variety of patient and operative factors. While strong data are lacking, the limited data that exists on the matter suggests that the independent contribution of the heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy to CRS and HIPEC morbidity is relatively small. A more thorough understanding of the patient and operative factors associated with CRS and HIPEC morbidity and mortality, as well as the specific complications related to the intraperitoneal chemotherapy, can better inform clinicians in multidisciplinary teams and patients alike in the decision-making for this surgery.

Repeated cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with recurrent peritoneal carcinomatosis

Background

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has become the treatment of choice for resectable peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) and improved the survival of these patients. The situation changes if PC recurs and repeated CRS with HIPEC is considered. The patient selection and outcome of the repeated approach has not been well described. We analyzed our cohort and share the experiences.

Methods

Ninety-three CRS/HIPEC procedures, performed in 85 patients during the period 2001–2013, were examined in a retrospective analysis. Type of primary, ECOG status, peritoneal cancer index (PCI), completeness of cytoreduction (CC), duration of hospitalization, postoperative morbidity, mortality, and disease-free/overall survival were reviewed.

Results

Six patients (7 %) underwent a second CRS/HIPEC (median interval between the two procedures: 26 months, range 8–61) including two patients with mesotheliomas, one patient with ovarian adenocarcinoma, one patient with leiomyosarcoma of uterus, one patient with colon adenocarcinoma, and one patient with appendiceal adenocarcinoma. The last two patients underwent a third CRS/HIPEC, 25 and 36 months, after the second procedure. The median PCI was 14 (range, 4–26) during the first and 20 (range, 7–39) during the second CRS/HIPEC of these patients. Completeness of cytoreduction score of 0 (CC-0) was achieved in all first procedures and in 67 % of second procedures (CC-0; n = 4 and CC-1; n = 2). A CC-0 score was possible in both of the third procedures. The mean operating time was 444 min (range, 198–642) and 427 min (range, 239–617) during the first and the second procedure. Median intensive care unit (ICU) was 2 days, and hospital stay after second CRS/HIPEC was 17 days (range, 7–50). The 30-day morbidity after repeated CRS/HIPEC was 33 % (16 % for grade III–IV complications), and there was no 30-day mortality neither after the second nor after the third CRS/HIPEC. Median disease-free interval between first CRS/HIPEC and peritoneal recurrence was 17 months (range, 8–30). Median disease-free survival of 18 months (range, 4–33) was achieved after the second CRS/HIPEC. After a median follow-up of 74 months (range, 39–151), all patients are alive with disease (n = 5) or disease free (n = 1) under chemotherapy.

Conclusions

In experienced centers, repeated CRS/HIPEC can be performed with safety. Patient selection and correct timing is of particular importance in achieving control of the disease. Repeated CRS/HIPEC should be considered as treatment option for selected patients with recurrent PC.

Multimodality treatment strategies have changed prognosis of peritoneal metastases

For a long time, treatment of peritoneal metastases (PM) was mostly palliative and thus, this status was link with “terminal status/despair”. The current multimodal treatment strategy, consisting of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), has been strenuously achieved over time, but seems to be the best treatment option for PM patients. As we reviewed the literature data, we could emphasize some milestones and also, controversies in the history of proposed multimodal treatment and thus, outline the philosophy of this approach, which seems to be an unusual one indeed. Initially marked by nihilism and fear, but benefiting from a remarkable joint effort of human and material resources (multi-center and -institutional research), over a period of 30 years, CRS and HIPEC found their place in the treatment of PM. The next 4 years were dedicated to the refinement of the multimodal treatment, by launching research pathways. In selected patients, with requires training, it demonstrated a significant survival results (similar to the Hepatic Metastases treatment), with acceptable risks and costs. The main debates regarding CRS and HIPEC treatment were based on the oncologists’ perspective and the small number of randomized clinical trials. It is important to statement the PM patient has the right to be informed of the existence of CRS and HIPEC, as a real treatment resource, the decision being made by multidisciplinary teams.

Peritoneal mesothelioma metastasis to the tongue - Comparison with 8 pleural mesothelioma reports with tongue metastases

Purpose

Malignant mesothelioma (MM) rarely arises from the peritoneum. We describe the 1st such case which metastasised to the head and neck region (tongue).

Methods

We briefly surveyed the American Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, and the British Cancer Research UK database for the latest trends in MM incidence. We did a systematic Pubmed search for other MM reports with tongue metastases.

Results and presentation of case

American and British data show that MM incidence in men has stabilised in the last 10 years, earlier than previously predicted. The tongue is an unusual site for MM spread, with ours being only the 9th such case described. Our summary of published cases of MM metastasising to the tongue brings out our patient to be the least in age(35 years), and the only one to have peritoneal MM as the primary. Seven of the 9 cases were male. Only 2 had a recorded history of exposure to asbestos. All 9 patients had the epithelioid subtype of MM. Surgery was done as the exclusive reported intervention in 4 out of the 9 patients. Only 2 cases received radiotherapy, amongst whom, only our patient responded.

Conclusions

Metastasis of MM to the tongue is rare and usually in the uncommon context of MM with multiple sites of extra-thoracic or extra-abdominal spread. We have described a unique clinical manifestation of a rare subtype of mesothelioma. Moreover, we have tabulated and summarised details (including responses to surgery or/and radiotherapy) regarding all reported cases of mesotheliomas with tongue metastasis.

•

MM incidence in “Western” men has stabilised in the last 10 years.

•

Our case of MM with tongue metastasis was unfortunately very young, in fact the least aged amongst all reported cases.

•

Our case is the only recorded one with peritoneal MM metastasising to the tongue.

•

Our case probably presents an unusual pattern of mesothelioma metastatic progression, specifically from the abdomen to the chest, and from there, to the oral cavity.

•

All reports of MM with tongue metastases concisely tabulated and compared.

Computerized System for Staging Peritoneal Surface Malignancies

Background

Peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs) are usually staged using Sugarbaker’s Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) and completeness of cytoreduction score (CC-s). Although these staging tools are essential for selecting patients and evaluating outcome after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), both scoring models lack some anatomic information, thus making staging laborious and unreliable. Maintaining Sugarbaker’s original concepts, we therefore developed a computerized digital tool, including a new anatomic scheme for calculating PCI and CC-s corresponding closely to patients’ real anatomy. Our new anatomic model belongs in a web-based application known as the PSM Staging System, which contains essential clinical and pathological data for the various PSMs currently treated.

Methods

The new digital tool for staging PSM runs on a personal computer or tablet and comprises male and female colored anatomic models for the 13 endoabdominal regions, with borders defined according to real anatomic landmarks. A drag-and-drop tool allows users to compute the PCI and CC-s, making it easier to localize and quantify disease at diagnosis and throughout treatment, and residual disease after CRS.

Conclusions

Once tested online by registered users, our computerized application should provide a modern, shareable, comprehensive, user-friendly PSM staging system. Its anatomic features, along with the drag-and-drop tool, promise to make it easier to compare preoperative and postoperative PCIs, thus improving the criteria for selecting patients to undergo CRS plus HIPEC. By specifying the size, site, and number of residual lesions after CRS plus HIPEC, our digital tool should help stratify patients into outcome classes.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1245/s10434-015-4966-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Incidence and treatment of recurrent disease after cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneally metastasized colorectal cancer: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The optimal treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of colorectal origin is a combination of cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + IPC). Although 5-year survival rates of up to 40% have been reported, recurrent disease remains common and is estimated to be a strong negative prognostic factor for survival. This systematic review elaborates on the incidence of recurrent disease and the possibilities to prevent and treat recurrence.

METHODS

Two searches were performed. To identify the magnitude of recurrent the disease, a search was performed in Pubmed and EMBASE until September 2014. A second search was performed in Pubmed to identify treatment of recurrent disease with secondary CRS + IPC.

RESULTS

The first search resulted in 139 and 94 articles in Pubmed and EMBASE respectively. Among those, 28 were included. Overall recurrence rates ranged from 22.5 to 82%. Local, systemic and combined local-systemic recurrence ranged from 6 to 42.5%, 10.4-43% and 5.8-21.5%. Median time to recurrence varied from 9 to 23 months, three-year disease free survival ranged from 14 to 41.5%. The second search resulted in 140 articles among which 17 met the inclusion criteria. A total of 190 patients underwent secondary CRS. Median survival after the second procedure ranged from 18 to 55.7 months. One, two and three-year survival ranged between 66 and 94, 44-50 and 0-66%.

CONCLUSION

Recurrence is very common after cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy for PC of colorectal origin. Repeat cytoreductive surgery suggests a potential survival benefit for a highly selected group. Therefore, strategies to prevent recurrence are of the utmost importance.

Advances in malignant peritoneal mesothelioma

BACKGROUND

Malignant mesothelioma is a rare, insidious, and aggressive tumor arising from the mesothelial surface of pleural and peritoneal cavities, the pericardium, or the tunica vaginalis, with an increasing incidence worldwide, high misdiagnosis rate, and overall negative prognosis. A total of 20% of all cases is peritoneum in origin.

METHODS

The present study is a review of literatures focusing on the advances in epidemiology, clinical presentations, radiological features, diagnosis, misdiagnosis, management, and prognostic factors of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) occurred in the past decades.

RESULTS

Asbestos, SV40, and radiation exposures have been demonstrated to be correlated with the pathogenesis of MPM. The main presentations are abdominal distension and pain. Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron-emission tomography (PET) play an important role in the preoperative imaging and staging. Definitive diagnosis is made on the basis of immunohistochemistry. Prognostic factors have been identified and verified. Negative indicators include advanced age, male gender, poor performance status, non-epithelial histology, and absence of surgery. The management of MPM has evolved from single chemotherapy to multimodality treatment of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy. Promising results have been achieved after a combined treatment of CRS and HIPEC, with an elevated median survival time of 29.5-92 months and a 5-year survival rate of 39-63%.

CONCLUSIONS

CRS and HIPEC represent the standard treatment strategy for selected patients with MPM, and patients with unresectable tumors can benefit from the combined treatment of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy.

Patterns of recurrence following complete cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

CytoReductive Surgery (CRS) combined with Hyperthermic IntraPEritoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) has an established role in the treatment of peritoneally metastasized colorectal cancer. The aim of the study was to describe the recurrence patterns and to evaluate treatment options and related survival.

METHODS

Patients treated with CRS + HIPEC in two tertiary referral centers between April 2005 and March 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. The prognostic value of several parameters was calculated using Cox Regression.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty two of 287 patients (46%) with peritoneal carcinomatosis treated with complete CRS and HIPEC were diagnosed with recurrent disease, after a median disease-free interval of 11.4 months. Recurrence were locoregional (43%), distant metastases (26%) or both (31%). Thirty-two of the 132 patients with recurrences (24%) were treated surgically with curative intent, which extended the median survival from 12 months to 43 months, compared to palliative treatment (best supportive care or chemotherapy; P < 0.001). Initial nodal status (P = 0.01) and the number of affected regions at initial CRS (P = 0.02) were significantly correlated to survival after disease recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Disease recurrence after CRS and HIPEC is common; in selected patients, an aggressive surgical approach may be beneficial and extend survival.