Medial Meniscal Extrusion Evaluation With Weight-Bearing Ultrasound: Correlation With MR Imaging Findings and Reported Symptoms: Correlation With MR Imaging Findings and Reported Symptoms

Generating New Meniscus Therapies via Recent Breakthroughs in Development, Model Systems, and Clinical Diagnostics

Over 850,000 surgeries are performed to treat meniscal injuries each year in the United States. Even with repair, patients are likely to develop osteoarthritis (OA) within the next two decades. There is a pressing clinical need to improve meniscal repair procedures to restore tissue function and prevent joint degeneration later in life. Here we present a review of recently published articles (2020-2024) spanning basic science, translational, and clinical studies to highlight new advances in meniscus research across development, animal models, finite element models, and clinical interventions. Key progenitor cell populations and vascularity changes have been identified in human meniscus tissue development, aging, and degeneration with implications for novel tissue repair strategies. The use of animal and finite element models has expanded our understanding of meniscus tissue function and evaluated new therapies in preclinical studies. Further, advances in clinical diagnostics with machine learning models and surgical techniques have shed light on evidence-based practices for improving patient outcomes. We discuss across multiple length scales (micro-, meso-, macro-) the structure-function relationship of the meniscus in development and disease, recent advances in models and tools to study the meniscus, knowledge gaps in the field, persisting challenges in clinical treatments and assessments, and the translation of basic science therapies into the clinic.

Biomechanical testing of virtual meniscus implants made from a bi-phasic silk fibroin-based hydrogel and polyurethane via finite element analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the suitability of different material compositions and structural designs for 3D-printed meniscus implants using finite element analysis (FEA) to improve joint function after meniscal injury and guide future implant development.

DESIGN

This experimental study involved in-silico testing of a meniscus model developed from two materials: a specially formulated hydrogel composed of silk fibroin (SF), gelatine, and decellularized meniscus-derived extracellular matrix (MD-dECM), and polyurethane (PU) with stiffness levels of 54 and 205 MPa. Both single-material implants and a two-volumetric meniscus model with an SF/gelatine/MD-dECM core and a PU shell were analysed using FEA to simulate the biomechanical performance under physiological conditions.

RESULTS

The hydrogel alone was found to be unsuitable for long-term use due to instability in material properties beyond two weeks. PU 54 closely replicated the biomechanical properties of an intact meniscus, particularly in terms of contact pressure and stress distribution. However, hybrid implants combining PU 54 with hydrogel showed potential but required further optimization to reduce stress peaks. In contrast, implants with a PU 205 shell generated higher induced stresses, increasing the risk of material failure.

CONCLUSIONS

FEA proves to be a valuable tool in the design and optimization of meniscal implants. The findings suggest that softer PU 54 is a promising material for mimicking natural meniscus properties, while stiffer materials may require design modifications to mitigate stress concentrations. These insights are crucial for refining implant designs and selecting appropriate material combinations before physical prototype production, potentially reducing costs, time, and the risk of implant failure.

Reduced physiological extrusion of the medial meniscus in axial load-bearing condition in anterior cruciate ligament deficiency

PURPOSE

In this study, ultrasonography was used to measure medial meniscus (MM) extrusion under weight-bearing and nonweight-bearing conditions in both anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient and ACL-intact knee groups. This study aimed to determine the possible differences between these groups with an eventual impact on meniscal tears in ACL-deficient knees.

METHODS

A total of 107 patients who underwent ACL reconstructive surgery between June 2022 and April 2023 were enroled. After applying exclusion criteria, 37 patients met the conditions for inclusion in the study and formed the ACL deficiency group (Group D). Of the 141 patients presenting to an outpatient clinic who agreed to have ultrasonography conducted on their nondiscomforting contralateral knee, 37 patients matched for age, sex, hip-knee-ankle angle and body mass index with Group D patients were selected for the ACL intact group (Group I). Ultrasonography was used to measure MM extrusion in weight-bearing and nonweight-bearing conditions for all participants.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients were included in the study (n = 37 per group). The supine position showed an MM extrusion of 1.2 ± 0.7 mm in Group I and 1.2 ± 0.7 mm in Group D (not significant). In the standing position, MM extrusion measured 2.0 ± 0.6 mm in Group I and 1.3 ± 0.8 mm in Group D. The difference in extrusion (Δextrusion) between the two positions was 0.8 ± 0.6 in Group I and 0.1 ± 0.2 in Group D, with statistical significance (p < 0.01). A consistent reduction in MM extrusion during weight-bearing was observed in patients with ACL deficiency, irrespective of the duration of ACL deficiency, age, sex and BMI.

CONCLUSION

ACL deficiency did not significantly impact MM extrusion during nonweight-bearing conditions; however, less MM extrusion was observed in response to axial loading conditions. These findings indicate altered MM biomechanics due to increased anterior-posterior meniscal motion and rotational instability after ACL injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Meniscal extrusion: Proposal for a novel qualitative classification

Meniscal extrusion (ME), defined as the radial displacement of the meniscal body outside the margins of the tibial plateau, has been seen as an independent and relevant predictor of intra-articular knee degeneration. Nonetheless, available classifications for ME are exclusively quantitative assessments not considering the context in which extrusion is identified. Indeed, ME can be the result of several different conditions spanning from acute tears to chronic degeneration and its definition cannot be only dependent on the numeric calculation of the radial displacement of the meniscal body. Furthermore, growing evidence supports the existence of a paraphysiological ME resulting from joint loading, limb malalignment, anatomical abnormalities of the meniscal attachments to the femur and tibia or a nonpathological finding after meniscal allograft transplantation. It is therefore clear that an exclusively quantitative assessment of ME cannot be sufficient since this condition can develop in such different clinical scenarios. For this reason, a novel qualitative classification for ME is proposed, differentiating between three distinct conditions: a paraphysiological ME, a pathological ME and ME related to degenerative conditions. Furthermore, a comprehensive review of the present literature has been conducted to report the most relevant and updated evidence on the topic highlighting the difference in the clinical management of each different category.

Level of Evidence

Not applicable.

Assessment of meniscal extrusion with ultrasonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the imaging of choice for meniscal extrusion (ME). However, they may underappreciate the load-dependent changes of the meniscus. There is growing evidence that weight-bearing ultrasound (WB US) is more suitable, particularly in revealing occult extrusion. We therefore perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the validity and reliability of US in diagnosing extrusion. Furthermore, we explored whether it detects differences in extrusion between loaded and unloaded positions and those with pathological (osteoarthritis and meniscal injury) and healthy knees.

METHODS

The Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, PubMed, Medline, and Embase were used to perform a systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. Data pertaining to intra- and interrater reliability of US in measuring meniscal extrusion (ME), its correlation with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and head-to-head comparison of potential factors to influence ME were included [loading versus unloading position; osteoarthritis (OA) or pathological menisci (PM) versus healthy knees; mild versus moderate-severe knee OA]. Pooled data were analyzed by random or fixed-effects models.

RESULTS

A total of 31 studies were included. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for intra- and interrater reliability were minimum 0.94 and 0.91, respectively. The correlation between US and MRI was (r = 0.76). US detected ME to be greater in the loaded position in all knees (healthy, p < 0.00001; OA, p < 0.00001; PM, p = 0.02). In all positions, US detected greater extrusion in OA (p < 0.0003) and PM knees (p = 0.006) compared with healthy controls. Furthermore, US revealed greater extrusion in moderate-severe OA knees (p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review suggests ultrasonography can play an important role in the measurement of meniscal extrusion, with results comparable to that of MRI. However, to what extent it can differentiate between physiological and pathological extrusion requires further investigation, with an absolute cutoff value yet to be determined. Nevertheless, it is an appropriate investigation to track the progression of disease in those with meniscal pathologies or osteoarthritis. Furthermore, it is a feasible investigation to evaluate the meniscal function following surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, Systematic review of level III-IV evidence.

Ultrasounds outperform magnetic resonance imaging in quantifying meniscal extrusion in patients with knee osteoarthritis

Purpose

The aim of this study was to quantify meniscal extrusion through ultrasound (US) evaluation in supine and standing positions and to compare the results with those documented through magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients affected by knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

Sixty patients (38 men, 22 women, mean age 60.8 ± 9.7 years) with knee OA were enrolled and underwent a 1.5 T MR evaluation and an US examination of the symptomatic OA knee for the evaluation of the medial and lateral meniscus extrusion both in the supine clinostatic position (clino-US) with the knee fully extended and in the standing weight-bearing orthostatic position (ortho-US). For the three imaging evaluations (MR, clino-US and ortho-US), both semi-quantitative and quantitative measurements were performed.

Results

The quantitative analysis documented higher values of medial meniscal extrusion at the ortho-US evaluation (5.2 ± 2.3 mm) compared to MR (4.2 ± 2.2, p < 0.0005) and clino-US (4.5 ± 2.3, p < 0.0005) and of the lateral meniscus at the ortho-US evaluation (4.3 ± 1.8) compared to MR (3.3 ± 1.6, p < 0.0005) and clino-US (3.8 ± 1.6, p < 0.0005). The semi-quantitative analysis confirmed the same trend for both menisci. Higher extrusion values were documented in women and more advanced OA, as well as in older patients with higher body mass index, the latter being underestimated the most by the MR approach.

Conclusion

US outperforms MR imaging in quantifying meniscal extrusion in patients with knee OA. Moreover, the highest values of meniscal extrusion have been documented using US in standing position compared to the supine position, underlining the importance of the weight-bearing assessment of meniscal extrusion in knee OA patients.

Level of Evidence

II.

Ultrasound Imaging in Diagnosis and Management of Lower Limb Injuries: A Comprehensive Review

Medical imaging tests are widely used to diagnose a broad spectrum of lower-limb injuries. Among these modalities, ultrasound (US) imaging has gained significant traction as a valuable diagnostic instrument for assessing conditions primarily affecting muscles, tendons, ligaments, and other soft tissues. However, there are important dilemmas related to the indications and possibilities of US in lower-limb injuries. Conflicting findings and approaches raise questions regarding the validity, accuracy, and usefulness of the US in that area. This narrative review attempts to summarize the current state of knowledge regarding US imaging of lower-limb injuries. The study provides a detailed discussion of the existing literature and contemporary insights on the diagnosis of lower-limb injuries using US examination, and draws attention to the role of the US in interventional procedures and monitoring of the healing process. The characteristics of normal muscles, tendons, and ligaments in US imaging are presented, along with the most commonly documented conditions affecting these tissues. Furthermore, the benefits and justifications for employing US in interventional procedures are discussed, ranging from platelet-rich plasma injections to physiotherapeutic treatments like percutaneous electrolysis. The study was further augmented with US pictures depicting various lower-limb injuries, mainly affecting young athletes. This article aims to review the role of US imaging in the diagnosis and management of common lower-limb injuries.

A Novel Ultrasound Method of Evaluating Dynamic Extrusion of Lateral Meniscus in Healthy Population: Different Patterns of Dynamic Extrusion Revealed Between Lateral and Medial Meniscus

OBJECTIVES

To establish a reliable ultrasound (US) method of evaluating dynamic extrusion of lateral meniscus in healthy population, and to investigate the pattern of dynamic meniscus extrusion (ME) in lateral meniscus under loading conditions.

METHODS

The lateral ME was examined via US method in unloaded, double-leg standing, and single-leg standing positions. Two different US measurement methods were compared to the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results to determine the optimal measurement methods. The US results obtained by different researchers were tested for interobserver consistency and the results obtained by the same researcher on two separate days were tested for intraobserver consistency. The patterns of dynamic extrusion were compared between medial and lateral sides.

RESULTS

A total of healthy 44 volunteers were included in the study, with 86 knees assessed by US, and 25 knees evaluated by MRI. The US evaluation of dynamic lateral ME demonstrated excellent interobserver and intraobserver reliability. The US measurements using method A were consistent with the MRI results with no significant difference (P = .861, intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.868), while method B underestimated the lateral ME compared to MRI (P = .001, ICC = 0.649). Lateral ME decreased slightly from unloaded (1.0 ± 0.8 mm) to single-leg standing position (0.8 ± 0.8 mm), whereas medial ME increased significantly in both double-leg and single-leg standing positions (2.4 ± 0.7 mm, 2.6 ± 0.7 mm).

CONCLUSION

A novel US evaluation method of lateral ME was established with reliable and accurate results compared to the MRI. Lateral ME in healthy populations decreased slightly as the loadings increased, which was different from the pattern of dynamic extrusion in medial meniscus.

Diagnostic accuracy of a novel ultrasound imaging index for knee osteoarthritis: Evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values

PURPOSE

We aimed to develop and validate a new ultrasonography (US) index for the diagnosis of primary medial-type knee osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

In total, 156 patients (203 limbs) underwent standing knee radiography and the US for suspected knee OA. Total osteophyte height (TOH) and distance between bones (DBB) aided diagnosis. Logistic regression identified optimal cutoff values. Thresholds from logistic regression informed recipient operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, balancing sensitivity and specificity. These thresholds were then applied in the differential thermal analysis (DTA) to construct a 2 × 2 table.

RESULTS

The TOH-DBB index showed that a DBB of 5.6 mm or less was required to diagnose primary medial-type knee arthropathy. The results in the 2 × 2 table were 41 true-positive (TP), 10 false negative (FN), 22 true-negative (TN), and 7 false positive (FP). A DBB of 5.6 mm or less and TOH of 4.7 mm or more were necessary to diagnose severe deformity. The results in the 2 × 2 table were 10 TP, 4 FN, 23 TN, and 4 FP.

CONCLUSION

The TOH-DBB index was confirmed to capture changes in primary medial-type knee OA across various stages.

The Role of Ultrasound in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Meniscal Injuries

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review evaluates the current understanding of the role of ultrasound in the diagnosis and treatment of meniscal disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ultrasound (US) demonstrates similar sensitivity and specificity when compared to magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of meniscal injuries when compared to arthroscopy. Meniscal extrusion (ME) under US can be a reliable metric to evaluate for meniscal root tears in knees with and without osteoarthritis (OA). Sonographic ME is associated with development of OA in knees without OA. US following allograft meniscal transplant may be useful in predicting graft failure. US findings can be used to screen for discoid menisci and may demonstrate snapping of a type 3 discoid lateral meniscus. Shear wave elastography for meniscal injuries is in its infancy; however, increased meniscal stiffness may be seen with meniscal degeneration. Perimeniscal corticosteroid injections may provide short term relief from meniscal symptoms, and intrameniscal platelet-rich plasma injections appear to be safe and effective up to three years. Ultrasound-assisted meniscal surgery may increase the safety of all inside repairs near the lateral root and may assist in assessing meniscal reduction following root repair. Diagnostic US can demonstrate with high accuracy a variety of meniscal pathologies and can be considered a screening tool. Newer technologies such as shear wave elastography may allow us to evaluate characteristics of meniscal tissue that is not possible on conventional imaging. US-guided (USG) treatment of meniscal injuries is possible and may be preferable to surgery for the initial treatment of degenerative meniscal lesions. USG or US-assisted meniscal surgery is in its infancy.

Clinical and radiologic outcomes in patients with meniscal root tears

BACKGROUND

Meniscal root tears can lead to early knee osteoarthritis and pain. This study aimed (1) to compare clinical and radiological outcomes between patients who underwent arthroscopic meniscal root repair after meniscal root tears and those who received non-surgical treatment, and (2) to identify whether baseline MRI findings could be potential predictors for future treatment strategies.

METHODS

Patients with meniscal root tears were identified from our picture archiving and communication system from 2016 to 2020. Two radiologists reviewed radiographs and MRI studies using Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading and a modified Whole Organ MRI Scoring (WORMS) at baseline and follow-up. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) of follow-up radiographs and MRI studies were 134 (44-443) days and 502 (260-1176) days, respectively. MR images were assessed for root tear-related findings. Pain scores using visual analogue scale (VAS) and management strategies (non-surgical vs. arthroscopic root repair) were also collected. Chi-squared tests and independent t-tests were used to assess differences regarding clinical and imaging variables between treatment groups. Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the associations between baseline MRI findings and each future treatment.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were included. VAS pain scores were significantly (p < 0.01) lower after arthroscopic repair compared to conservative treatment (1.27±0.38vs.4±0.52) at the last follow-up visit with median (IQR) of 325 (180-1391) days. Increased meniscal extrusion (mm) was associated with higher odds of receiving non-surgical treatment (OR = 1.65, 95%CI 1.02-2.69, p = 0.04). The odds of having arthroscopic repair increased by 19% for every 1 mm increase in the distance of the tear from the root attachment (OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.05-1.36, p < 0.01). The odds of undergoing arthroscopic repair were reduced by 49% for every 1 mm increase in the extent of meniscal extrusion (OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.29-0.91, p = 0.02) as observed in the baseline MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent arthroscopic repair had lower pain scores than patients with conservative treatment in the follow-up. Distance of the torn meniscus to the root attachment and the extent of meniscal extrusion were significant predictors for arthroscopic repair in the next three weeks (time from the baseline MRI to the surgery date).

Functional Imaging of the Knee-A Comprehensive Review

Knee pain is a common presenting problem in the general population. Radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the cornerstones of imaging in current clinical practice. With advancements in technology, there has been increasing utilization of other modalities to evaluate knee disorders. Dynamic assessment utilizing computed tomography and portable ultrasounds have demonstrated the capacity to accurately assess and reproducibly quantify kinematics of knee disorders. Cartilage physiology can be evaluated with MRI. Emerging research has even demonstrated novel musculoskeletal applications of positron emission tomography to evaluate anterior cruciate ligament graft metabolic activity following reconstruction. As technology continues to evolve and traditional ways are improved upon, future comparative studies will elucidate the distinct advantages of the various modalities. Although radiology is still primarily an anatomic specialty, there is immense potential for functional imaging to be the standard of care. This review focuses on the most common musculoskeletal applications of functional imaging as well as future utilization.

Meniscal extrusion in knees with and without osteoarticular pathology: A systematic review of normative values and cut-offs for diagnostic criteria

BACKGROUND

Meniscus extrusion is crucial for the diagnosis and treatment of meniscal injury, but the literature on this topic has not yet been systematized. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare diagnostic methods and summarize the data of medial and lateral meniscal extrusion in knees with and without osteoarticular pathology.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 statement. Searches were conducted on PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases to identify studies that measured meniscal extrusion using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound (US). Meniscal extrusion data was summarized as weighted mean for medial and lateral meniscus, and stratified according to the method of measurement (MRI or US) and presence of knee osteoarticular pathology.

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies were included in this review. Weighted mean values of meniscal extrusion were always higher for the medial than the lateral meniscus, regardless of the method of measurement. The medial meniscus extrusion was always higher in knees with osteoarticular pathology than those without. For the lateral meniscus extrusion, the mean values were higher in those knees without osteoarticular pathology. When classifying pathological meniscal extrusion with pre-defined cut-off values, the higher the cut-off used, the lower the percentage of knees classified as pathological meniscal extrusion.

CONCLUSIONS

The medial meniscus presents on mean higher extrusion and extrusion is higher in knees with osteoarticular pathology. Based on summary data, the most suitable cut-offs for pathological meniscal extrusion for both MRI and US seem to fall within >2 and >3 mm.

The meniscal extrusion index is a reliable indirect sign of different meniscal lesion patterns: a classification based on percentage of meniscal extrusion

PURPOSE

This study's goal is to propose a straightforward classification system based on the MEI (Meniscal Extrusion Index), a measure of meniscal extrusion, that relates to various meniscal lesion patterns and has clinical and biomechanical significance. The study's secondary goal is to determine whether the standard 3 mm meniscal extrusion parameter still has value by correlating the MEI with it.

METHODS

1350 knee MRIs that were performed over the course of 2 years made up the study cohort. Following the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 200 of those patients were qualified to participate in the study. All the measurements examined for this study underwent an interobserver reliability test.

RESULTS

In the 1350 MRIs that were examined for this study, meniscal extrusion of any grade was present 18.9% of the time. The use of the MEI revealed three groups of patients: those with a MEI < 20%, who are likely para-physiological; those with a MEY between 20% and 40%, who are in a grey area; and those with a MEY > 40%, who have lesions that are impairing the proper meniscal function. According to the authors' findings, the percentage of meniscal extrusion did not correlate with the finite number (3 mm), making the 3 mm parameter an unreliable evaluation method.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is clinically relevant, because it proposes a simple and reproducible classification of meniscal extrusion that may aid in evaluating the severity of an extrusion and help in the diagnosis of lesions that might be difficult to identify on MRI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.