Post-sinus surgery insertion of steroid-eluting bioabsorbable intranasal devices: A systematic review

Comparing Efficacy of Steroid Irrigation + Steroid-Eluting Sinus Stent Versus Steroid Irrigation Alone for Maintaining Frontal Sinus Patency After Sinus Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Steroid rinses and steroid-eluting stents are both options for preventing postoperative stenosis after frontal sinus surgery. This study aimed to assess whether steroid-eluting stents offer added benefit over steroid rinses alone in postoperative healing and long-term frontal sinus patency.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial enrolled patients with CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) who underwent surgery for bilateral and equal frontal sinusitis after failing prior medical therapy. Each patient served as their own control, with each patient randomized to stent placement in either right or left frontal sinuses. Exclusion criteria included unequal frontal sinusitis, aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease, cystic fibrosis, primary ciliary dyskinesia, and immunocompromise. All patients used steroid rinses postoperatively. Scarring, edema, patency, and the need for additional treatments were assessed at 1, 3, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients were enrolled. Postoperatively, scarring, edema, patency, and the need for further treatment were similar in both groups at 24 weeks (p = 0.878, 0.688, 0.817, 1.00, and 1.00, respectively). Multivariable regression analysis identified time as an independent risk factor for scarring (OR = 1.32, [1.03‒1.71]) and patency (OR = 1.39, [1.10‒1.82]), while it was an independent protective factor for edema (OR = 0.40, [0.32‒0.49]). The steroid-eluting stent did not significantly affect this.

CONCLUSION

For CRSwNP, with or without asthma, without other underlying systemic disease factors, steroid-eluting stents may not add benefit over steroid rinses in reducing postoperative scarring and edema, improving long-term frontal sinus patency, or reducing the need for additional treatments, as long as patients continue topical therapy and know how to rinse effectively.

[Results of a survey on the current management of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in Germany]

INTRODUCTION

With a prevalence of 0.55% to 4%, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a relevant part of the daily work of German otolaryngologists. The aim of the questionnaire-based data collection was to assess the current treatment status of CRSwNP in Germany.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For this purpose, 24 questions within an anonymized online questionnaire were sent to all German ENT departments.

RESULTS

Of 160 contacted ENT departments, 50 participated in the survey (31.3%). Among these, 76% performed more than 100 sinus surgeries annually and 38% treated more than 50 patients with biologics. Saline irrigations (80%) and intranasal glucocorticoids (GCS, 96%) were the most common conservative therapies. Systemic GCSs (52%) and intranasal GCS irrigation (20%) were less common. 80% of departments used biologics in the therapy of CRSwNP with an overall preference for dupilumab (70%). For therapy of aspirin intolerance, biologics (52%) were preferred to aspirin desensitization (26%). Prior to treatment with biologics clinical workup included the nasal polyp score (90%), the SNOT-22 questionnaire (84%), surrogate markers of type 2 inflammation (60%-72%), and computer tomography (50%). Final treatment success was assessed after 24 weeks (50%).

CONCLUSION

Mostly, the responding departments followed German and European recommendations for diagnosis and therapy of CRSwNP. Therapy with biologics is widely used. The value of preoperative systemic GCS and the frequent performance of CT before initiation of therapy with a biologic should be debated in regard to its currently widespread use.

Bioabsorbable dressing impregnated with betamethasone and ciprofloxacin after endoscopic sinus surgery: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

In addition to its hemostatic and stabilization role, biodegradable nasal packing can be used as a carrier for drugs after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). The aim of this study was to compare the influence of biodegradable synthetic polyurethane foam (NasoPore) soaked with ciprofloxacin, or betamethasone, or both to the same foam soaked with saline after FESS.

METHODS

120 adults with chronic rhinosinusitis, with and without polyps, directed for bilateral full-house FESS were enrolled for the study. The patients were randomized and blinded into 3 groups, depending on the type of postoperative procedure applied. Thus, NasoPore soaked with antibiotic was provided to the first group; in the second group, the steroid was used; and the combination of both, in the third group. In each case, the aforementioned procedure was administered on one side of the nose, while NasoPore was soaked in saline on the other, at the end of the surgery, respectively. The patients were requested to complete a questionnaire during their postoperative visits at 2, 10, 30, 90, and 180 days, scoring the level of complaints on the VAS scale, separately for each side. The evaluation of the healing process was performed at each visit using rigid endoscopy and subsequently rated on numerical scales.

RESULTS

Decreased mucosal edema and secretion; reduced Lund-Kennedy score; and favorable influences on facial pressure, nasal blockage, and smell were most evidently seen in the group receiving the antibioticsteroid combination.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of biodegradable nasal packing with betamethasone and ciprofloxacin in sino-nasal surgery has positive effects not only on the healing process but also impacts patient's comfort. To optimize it, however, further research is needed.

Porous silicon embedded in a thermoresponsive hydrogel for intranasal delivery of lipophilic drugs to treat rhinosinusitis

Intranasal delivery is the most preferred route of drug administration for treatment of a range of nasal conditions including chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), caused by an infection and inflammation of the nasal mucosa. However, localised delivery of lipophilic drugs for persistent nasal inflammation is a challenge especially with traditional topical nasal sprays. In this study, a composite thermoresponsive hydrogel is developed and tuned to obtain desired rheological and physiochemical properties suitable for intranasal administration of lipophilic drugs. The composite is comprised of drug-loaded porous silicon (pSi) particles embedded in a poloxamer 407 (P407) hydrogel matrix. Mometasone Furoate (MF), a lipophilic corticosteroid (log P of 4.11), is used as the drug, which is loaded onto pSi particles at a loading capacity of 28 wt%. The MF-loaded pSi particles (MF@pSi) are incorporated into the P407-based thermoresponsive hydrogel (HG) matrix to form the composite hydrogel (MF@pSi-HG) with a final drug content ranging between 0.1 wt% to 0.5 wt%. Rheomechanical studies indicate that the MF@pSi component exerts a minimal impact on gelation temperature or strength of the hydrogel host. The in-vitro release of the MF payload from MF@pSi-HG shows a pronounced increase in the amount of drug released over 8 h (4.5 to 21-fold) in comparison to controls consisting of pure MF incorporated in hydrogel (MF@HG), indicating an improvement in kinetic solubility of MF upon loading into pSi. Ex-vivo toxicity studies conducted on human nasal mucosal tissue show no adverse effect from exposure to either pure HG or the MF@pSi-HG formulation, even at the highest drug content of 0.5 wt%. Experiments on human nasal mucosal tissue show the MF@pSi-HG formulation deposits a quantity of MF into the tissues within 8 h that is >19 times greater than the MF@HG control (194 ± 7 μg of MF/g of tissue vs. <10 μg of MF/g of tissue, respectively).

The efficacy and safety of several interventions of corticosteroids for CRSwNP patients after endoscope sinus surgery: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroid has been a mainstay of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) medical therapy. While endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) will be performed when patients had failed to respond to maximal medical therapy. Many studies shown that several corticosteroids of interventions (e.g., nasal spray, oral, atomization/nebulization, nasal irrigation, direct infiltration, and steroid-eluting stent, etc) have each demonstrated significant efficacy compared with placebo or no corticosteroids intervention except intranasal corticosteroids for the treatment of CRSwNP after ESS. The aim of this systematic review and network meta-analysis is to answer the following question: which 1 is the best corticosteroid of intervention for CRSwNP patients after ESS?

METHODS

A systematic review will be conducted to identify studies involving randomized controlled trials which compared several different interventions of corticosteroids (e.g., nasal spray, oral, atomization/nebulization, nasal irrigation, direct infiltration, steroid-eluting stent, etc) for CRSwNP patients after ESS. The primary outcomes are efficacy (e.g., effective rate or cure rate), visual analogic scale of symptom severity, Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score, adverse events, and so on. We will comprehensively search PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wangfang and VIP journal database from inception to July, 2022. For studies which meet our inclusion criteria, 2 reviewers will extract data independently and assess the quality of literature using a revision of version 2 of the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2.0). A random effects model will be used for all pairwise meta-analyses (with a 95% confidence interval). Network meta-analyses will be conducted to generate estimates of comparative effectiveness of each intervention class and rankings of their effectiveness.

RESULTS

The results of this study expect to provide a high-quality, evidence-based recommendation on which 1 is the best corticosteroid of intervention for CRSwNP patients after ESS?

DISCUSSION

This study will provide evidence regarding the comparability of several interventions of corticosteroids for CRSwNP patients after ESS. Also, the data generated from this review will provide health-care providers with a clear evidence synthesis of CRSwNP patients after ESS management strategies. These data will be incorporated into the development of a patient decision aid to assist patients and clinicians in making a preference-based decision when faced with a CRSwNP patients after ESS as well.

Effects of implants with steroids after endoscopic sinus surgery: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis affects approximately 5%-2% of the general population worldwide. Steroid implants after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) have drawn considerable interest for their cost savings, but relevant guidelines indicate that evidence on this topic is of low quality with high heterogeneity. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of steroid implants after ESS by synthesizing relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

Two authors independently assessed the eligibility of potential references from five biomedical databases. They further extracted relevant data from the included studies, including (a) mean, standard deviation, or standard error for Lund-Kennedy endoscopic (LKE) score and Perioperative Sinus Endoscopy (POSE) score and (b) events and sample sizes of each group for further intervention. Data were pooled in a random-effects model, and results were presented as the weighted mean difference (WMD) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and I² .

RESULTS

Eleven RCTs (n = 853) were included and showed that the steroid implant group had lower LKE scores (WMD, -1.19; 95% CI, -1.75 to -0.62; I²  = 0%) and POSE scores (WMD, -1.62; 95% CI, -2.47 to -0.76; I²  = 48%) than the placebo implant group at postoperative week 2. Moreover, the reoperation rate in the steroid implant group was also lower than in the placebo implant group (RR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.80; I²  = 0%). However, no significant difference was observed in the postoperative oral steroid requirement between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, steroid implant decreases LKE and POSE among patients receiving ESS in the short term, but long-term effects remain unclear. Patient-based outcomes are worth further discussion in the future.

Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Published in High-Impact Otolaryngology Journals

OBJECTIVE

To assess the methodological quality of intervention-focused systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) published in high-impact otolaryngology journals.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library.

REVIEW METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed for SR and MA citations from 2012 to 2017 in the 10 highest impact factor otolaryngology journals. Abstracts were screened to identify published manuscripts in which the authors indicated clearly that they were performing an SR or MA. Applying a modified typology of reviews, 4 reviewers characterized the review type as SR, MA, or another review type. A simplified version of the AMSTAR 2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2) tool was used to assess the reporting and methodological quality of the SRs and MAs that were focused on interventions.

RESULTS

Search and abstract screening generated 499 manuscripts that identified themselves as performing an SR or MA. A substantial number (85/499, 17%) were review types other than SRs or MAs, including 34 (7%) that were literature reviews. In total, 236 SRs and MAs focused on interventions. Over 50% of these SRs and MAs had weaknesses in at least 3 of the 16 items in the AMSTAR 2, and over 40% had weaknesses in at least 2 of the 7 critical domains. Ninety-nine percent of SRs and MAs provided critically low confidence in the results of the reviews.

CONCLUSION

Intervention-focused SRs and MAs published in high-impact otolaryngology journals have important methodological limitations that diminish confidence in the results of these reviews.

Ethmoidal drug-eluting stent therapy is not superior to nasal corticosteroid spray in the prevention of endoscopic sinus surgery: Results from a randomised, clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether an ethmoidal drug-eluting stent (DES) (the Relieva Stratus™ MicroFlow Spacer) could better prevent endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) than standard non-invasive therapy using corticosteroid nasal spray in patients suffering from chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).

DESIGN

Prospective, randomised clinical trial.

SETTING

Tertiary referral centre.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty-three adult patients with ethmoidal involvement in cone beam computerised tomography (CBCT) whose first-line medical treatment with topical corticosteroids had failed and who were candidates for ESS were randomised either to a DES group, which received triamcinolone acetonide stents (n = 34), or to a topical intranasal corticosteroid group (n = 29) that used optimally dosed triamcinolone acetonide nasal spray.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients were followed up prospectively for 6 months and at 36 months. Freedom from ESS was the primary endpoint. Further, we identified those factors predicting ESS.

RESULTS

At 6 months, ESS could be prevented in almost half of the patients in both groups (DES 13/28, 46.4%, nasal spray 14/29, 48.3%). At 36 months, 20/28 (71.4%) patients in the DES group and 18/29 (62.1%) in the nasal spray group had been operated. The differences were not statistically significant at either timepoint. Patients who smoked (14/19, 73.7% vs 16/38, 42.1%) were more likely to be operated at 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic sinus surgery can be prevented using both therapies in the medium term in almost half of cases with neither therapy being statistically superior. This effect was somewhat diminished in the long term with a trend towards more patients being operated in the DES group. Considering the additional costs, the need for general anaesthesia and the potential side effects associated with DES, its potential clinical role appears to be limited. Smoking was significantly associated with ESS.

Postoperative care in endoscopic sinus surgery: a critical review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyps is a common disease affecting people all over the world. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) has become the gold standard treatment for medically refractive disease. Postoperative care is recommended by international leaders as an important part of the patient's management. This article is a critical review and discussion focusing on postoperative care, which is based on expert opinion, clinical studies, randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis studies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Postoperative care including nasal rinsing, topical corticosteroids, antibiotics and avoidance of nasal packing are unanimously considered to be the cornerstone of best practice following FESS. However, the effectiveness of in-office nasal debridement is still under debate.

SUMMARY

There is a lack of consensus regarding the necessity of performing in-office nasal debridement and the majority of clinicians carry out their postoperative care according to experience and their own preference. This is often determined by the extent of surgery performed, the severity of the postoperative inflammation, as well as being dependent on the patient's discomfort, the time constraints associated with postoperative care and the costs associated with additional appointments. Ideally, nasal debridement should be performed by the operating surgeon under endoscopic control both gently and atraumatically.

Formulation, functional evaluation and ex vivo performance of thermoresponsive soluble gels - A platform for therapeutic delivery to mucosal sinus tissue

Mucoadhesive in situ gelling systems (soluble gels) have received considerable attention recently as effective stimuli-transforming vectors for a range of drug delivery applications. Considering this fact, the present work involves systematic formulation development, optimization, functional evaluation and ex vivo performance of thermosensitive soluble gels containing dexamethasone 21-phosphate disodium salt (DXN) as the model therapeutic. A series of in situ gel-forming systems comprising the thermoreversible polymer poloxamer-407 (P407), along with hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose (HPMC) and chitosan were first formulated. The optimized soluble gels were evaluated for their potential to promote greater retention at the mucosal surface, for improved therapeutic efficacy, compared to existing solution/suspension-based steroid formulations used clinically. Optimized soluble gels demonstrated a desirable gelation temperature with Newtonian fluid behaviour observed under storage conditions (4-8°C), and pseudoplastic fluid behaviour recorded at nasal cavity/sinus temperature (≈34°C). The in vitro characterization of formulations including rheological evaluation, textural analysis and mucoadhesion studies of the gel form were investigated. Considerable improvement in mechanical properties and mucoadhesion was observed with incorporation of HPMC and chitosan into the gelling systems. The lead poloxamer-based soluble gels, PGHC4 and PGHC7, which were carried through to ex vivo permeation studies displayed extended drug release profiles in conditions mimicking the human nasal cavity, which indicates their suitability for treating a range of conditions affecting the nasal cavity/sinuses.