Comprehensive application of robotic retroauricular thyroidectomy: The evolution of robotic thyroidectomy

Clinical status and future prospects of single-incision robotic-assisted surgery: a review

Since the advent of conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery, the prosperity of minimally invasive surgery has been thriving on the advancement of endoscopic techniques. Cosmetic superiority, recovery benefits, and noninferior surgical outcomes weigh single-incision laparoscopic surgery as a promising modality. Although there are surgical challenges posed by steep learning curve and technological difficulties, such as instruments collision, triangulation loss and limited retraction, the establishment of robotic surgical platform as a solution to all is inspiring. Furthermore, with enhanced instrument maneuverability and stability, robotic ergonomic innovations adopt the advantages of single-incision laparoscopic surgery and surmount its recognized barriers by introducing a novel combination, single-incision robotic-assisted surgery. As was gradually diffused in general surgery and other specialties, single-incision robotic-assisted surgery manifests privileges in noninferior clinical outcomes an satisfactory cosmetic effect among strictly selected patients, and has the potential of a preferable surgical option for minimally invasive surgery.

Global trends in research of endoscopic thyroidectomy from 2013 to 2022: a scientometric and visualization analysis

Introduction

Recently, endoscopic thyroidectomy has been developed and applied to thyroid surgery to achieve minimized neck scar formation and enhanced aesthetic outcomes. Our scientometric research in this paper offers a thorough overview of endoscopic thyroidectomy from 2013 to 2022.

Methods

All pertinent articles on endoscopic thyroidectomy were obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection Database. The data on the number of citations and publications, most prolific countries and institutions, significant authors and journals, top themes, and keywords were analyzed by Biblioshiny, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer.

Results

There were 758 publications, all of that were found from 2013 to 2022. The output of the annual publication showed an upward trend. A series of cases report by Anuwong et al. published in 2016 received the most citations. The country with the most articles published articles was South Korea, and the two countries with the most collaboration were South Korea and the United States. The most productive journal was Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. Dionigi G, Kim HY, and Anuwong A were the writers with the most articles published, the highest h- and g-indices, and the strongest link strength, respectively. The keywords "endoscopic thyroidectomy", "surgical", "thyroidectomy", "robotic thyroidectomy", "experience", and others were most used.

Conclusion

The innovative surgical technique, transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA), leaves no scars and produces optimal cosmetic results. However, the long-term oncologic results for thyroid cancer performed with this approach are still missing. This scientometric analysis can offer valuable insights into the present research standing and key focal points in this domain, enabling researchers to gain a precise understanding of the state-of-the-art research in this area.

Robot-Assisted Retroauricular Anterior Scalenectomy for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

Background

This study described the surgical technique of a robot-assisted retroauricular anterior scalenectomy and assessed clinical outcomes and complications for patients with neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome (nTOS).

Methods

Between February 2014 and August 2016, 5 patients underwent robot-assisted retroauricular anterior scalenectomy using the da Vinci Xi system for nTOS. For clinical assessment, visual analog scale (VAS) symptom score, pinch and grip strength, and disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score were assessed to compare preoperative and postoperative outcomes. Postoperative complications were also reviewed.

Results

The VAS symptom, pinch and grip strength, and DASH scores improved 1 year after the operation. All patients were satisfied with the surgical scars. Temporary postoperative complications, which spontaneously resolved within 3 months, were noticed in 2 patients: one with vocal cord palsy and the other with upper brachial plexus palsy.

Conclusions

The robot-assisted retroauricular anterior scalenectomy for patients with nTOS seems feasible and safe, providing satisfactory cosmetic results.

Recent Advances in the Surgical Management of Thyroid Cancer

A growing incidence of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) has been reported in most developed countries, corresponding mainly to incidentally discovered small papillary thyroid carcinomas. Given the excellent prognosis of most patients with DTC, optimal therapeutic management, minimizing complications, and preserving patient quality of life are essential. Thyroid surgery has a central role in both the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of patients with DTC. Thyroid surgery should be integrated into the global and multidisciplinary management of patients with DTC. However, the optimal surgical management of DTC patients is still controversial. In this review article, we discuss the recent advances and current debates in DTC surgery, including preoperative molecular testing, risk stratification, the extent of thyroid surgery, innovative surgical tools, and new surgical approaches.

Three-port transoral robotic thyroidectomy without axillary incision: A preliminary report on a case series from Vietnam

BACKGROUND

Transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) is one of the newest approaches and draws attention because of its cosmetic excellence. Here, we present our preliminary data from the initial 5 consecutive patients to explore the feasibility of three-port TORT without axillary incision.

METHODS

From August 2022 to December 2022, we performed TORT using three ports via the da Vinci Xi system with three robotic arms.

RESULTS

All 5 patients had cT1aN0M0 papillary thyroid carcinomas with a mean tumour size of 6 mm. All patients underwent lobectomy with ipsilateral central neck dissection. The mean surgical time was 170 ± 15,8 min; the average length of hospital stay is 4.2 days. The number of retrieved central lymph nodes was 4.2 ± 0.8. All patients were discharged uneventfully without complications and completely satisfied with the cosmetic results.

CONCLUSIONS

TORT is feasible and safe when performed on carefully selected patients by experienced surgeons.

Facelift thyroid surgery: a systematic review of indications, surgical and functional outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To investigate indications, surgical and functional outcomes of robotic or endoscopic facelift thyroid surgery (FTS) and whether FTS reported comparable outcomes of other surgical approaches.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus.

REVIEW METHODS

A literature search was conducted about indications, clinical and surgical outcomes of patients who underwent FTS using PICOTS and PRISMA Statements. Outcomes reviewed included age; gender; indications; pathology; functional evaluations; surgical outcomes and complications.

RESULTS

Fifteen papers met our inclusion criteria, accounting for 394 patients. Endoscopic or robotic FTS was carried out for benign and malignant thyroid lesions, with or without central neck dissection. Nodule size and thyroid lobe volume did not exceed 6, 10 cm, respectively. FTS reported comparable outcome with transaxillary or oral approaches about operative time, complication rates or drainage features. The mean operative time ranged from 88 to 220 min, depending on the type of surgery (endoscopic vs robotic hemi- or total thyroidectomy). Conversion to open surgery was rare, occurring in 0-6.3% of cases. The most common complications were earlobe hypoesthesia, hematoma, seroma, transient hypocalcemia and transient recurrent nerve palsy. There was an important disparity between studies about the inclusion/exclusion criteria, surgical and functional outcomes.

CONCLUSION

FTS is a safe and effective approach for thyroid benign and malignant lesions. FTS reports similar complications to conventional thyroidectomy and excellent cosmetic satisfaction.

Bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy: review of a single surgeon's consecutive 317 cases

Background

Bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy (BABA RT) is one of the most popular remote-access approaches for thyroid surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of BABA RT.

Methods

Medical records of patients who underwent BABA RT between July 2008 and July 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Surgeries were performed by one surgeon at one institution. Clinicopathological features and postoperative surgical outcomes were evaluated.

Results

A total of 317 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 40.0±9.7 years, and 287 (90.5%) were female. The mean tumor size was 1.02 cm. Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) was most commonly seen (n=282, 88.8%), followed by benign nodules (n=33, 10.5%) and follicular thyroid carcinoma (n=2, 0.6%). Total thyroidectomy was performed in 202 (63.7%) patients, while unilateral lobectomy was performed in 113 (35.6%). Two patients (0.6%) had transient vocal cord palsy, but none showed permanent vocal cord palsy. Thirty-four (16.8%) patients developed hypoparathyroidism, 33 (16.3%) were transient and 1 (0.5%) was permanent. The mean operation time for total thyroidectomy and lobectomy was 264.9±52.4 and 203.4±47.6 min, respectively. A decrease in operation time in total thyroidectomy was observed in 49-51 cases (P=0.015). Four patients (1.4%) had local recurrence during the median follow-up of 61±23 months.

Conclusions

BABA RT can be performed safely in selected patients with thyroid nodules. The learning curve duration for BABA RT was 49-51 cases of total thyroidectomy.

Current concepts in thyroid gland surgery: transoral endoscopic and robotic surgical procedures

The increased incidence of thyroid cancer in young females may raise concerns about visible hypertrophic scarring on the center of the neck after thyroid gland surgery. Therefore, endoscopic surgical procedures have attracted significant interest from patients with thyroid cancer, leading to the development of various endoscopic and robotic approaches. Although the cosmetic outcomes of current endoscopic and robotic thyroid surgeries have been excellent, all the procedures still require a large incision and extensive flap elevation. Transoral endoscopic thyroid surgery is a newly developed surgical method performed by inserting an endoscope through a mucosal opening created in the mouth, obviating the need for a skin incision. Additionally, the dissection area is relatively small and no dressings are required. Showering or shaving may resume the day after surgery and the port created within the oral mucous membrane generally heals within one week. Importantly, this approach is markedly less invasive than other endoscopic approaches. Although transoral endoscopic thyroid surgery has not yet been universally accepted, it may emerge as the preferred method for thyroid surgery in the near future.

Endoscopic cephalic access thyroid surgery (EndoCATS) using the retroauricular approach - a single centre retrospective data analysis

BACKGROUND

Due to improvements in endoscopic as well as robotic technology, and a request for better cosmetic results, there was a significant increase in thyroid surgery using these methods during the past decade.

METHODS

The aim of our study is to evaluate the perioperative short- and long-term outcome as well as the learning curve of EndoCATS and the Quality of Life (QoL).

RESULTS

A total of 150 patients with 152 hemithyroidectomies who underwent endoscopic thyroid surgery by EndoCATS between 2010 and 2016 were enrolled in this study. The mean specimen volume was 15.04 g ± 7.89 g. The mean operation time was 132.79 ± 50.52 min. There is a significant reduction of the operation time after the 53th case. (p < 0.05) There was no acute rebleeding or permanent hypoparathyroidism. Permanent RLN palsy occurred in 3 nerves at risk (NAR) 1.97%. There were no cases of pneumothorax, postoperative infections or skin flap ischemia. 94.11% of the patients describe their state of general health as good as or better than before the surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

EndoCATS is a safe and effective, but a demanding single port access procedure; therefore, extensive training is required. An advantage is the near ideal visualization of the RLN and the parathyroid glands as well as the ability to recover even large specimens without difficulties.

Surgical approaches to thyroid

Thyroidectomy is the most frequent procedure in endocrine surgery. The conventional approach through a collar incision, as described by Kocher in XIX^th century, has become the "gold standard". It is continuously evolving in spite of, many years ago, it showed to be safe and efficient with quality standards difficult to beat. Endoscopic and robotic surgery have developed "new approaches" to thyroid in order to improve the cosmetic results, looking even for invisible scars. We have done a thoughtful review of most of them trying to understand their benefits and drawbacks. Currently none of these "new approaches" have been shown to be better than conventional open thyroidectomy beyond offering a better cosmetic result. Besides, only a small percentage of patients can benefit of them. However, most of these approaches will remain if they treat the diseased thyroid and also improve the quality of life of our patients.

Transoral Thyroidectomy: Advantages and Disadvantages

To date, many remote-access thyroid surgery techniques using endoscopic or robotic instruments have been developed. Transoral thyroidectomy has attracted great attention as a scarless thyroidectomy and is performed worldwide. Each surgical method has its advantages and disadvantages: selecting the optimal surgical method according to each patient's condition and preferences will possibly result in obtaining the best results and achieving patient satisfaction while minimizing complications after surgery.

Preoperative scar perception study comparing 'scarless' in the neck endoscopic thyroidectomy with open thyroidectomy: a cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

Open thyroidectomy is the most common approach to thyroid surgery. However, 'scarless' (in the neck) endoscopic thyroidectomy, consisting of endoscopic and robotic surgery, is progressively being adopted for its perceived cosmetic benefits. This study aims to determine the patient's preferred surgical approach and to identify the factors that influence their decision.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A pilot study consisting of 100 patients with a surgical thyroid disorder were prospectively recruited from a single tertiary centre. An interviewer-administered survey was conducted. Demographic, socioeconomic status, scar perception and an adapted body image scale were evaluated to identify factors that shaped the patient's perception of the surgical approach.

RESULTS

The mean age of participants was 54.5 ± 13.0 years; 72% were women and 87% Chinese. Of the 100 patients, 75 patients considered scarless endoscopic thyroidectomy as their preferred surgical approach while 25 patients opted for open thyroid surgery. Improvement in scar perception score between scarless endoscopic thyroidectomy and open thyroid surgery is associated with an increased willingness to choose scarless endoscopic thyroidectomy. The mean body image scale score was 6.9 ± 2.8, indicating no statistical difference between the surgical approaches. On multivariate analysis, improvement in scar perception score (odds ratio 3.38, 95% confidence interval 1.11-10.29) and having surgeon recommendation (odds ratio 6.38, 95% confidence interval 1.80-22.63) were independently associated with interest in scarless endoscopic thyroidectomy.

CONCLUSION

Patients interest in undergoing scarless endoscopic thyroidectomy is driven by improved scar perception and surgeon's recommendation compared with open thyroid surgery.

Robotic thyroid surgery

Various remote access robotic thyroidectomy techniques have been developed using the da Vinci® surgical system (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) to hide or avoid neck scarring and overcome the limitations of endoscopic thyroidectomy. Among those used today are the gasless transaxillary approach, the bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA), the gasless postauricular facelift approach, and the transoral approach. Especially, the recently introduced transoral approach (including robotic and endoscopic procedures) is prominent and now popular worldwide. The most significant advantages of remote access robotic thyroidectomy are excellent postoperative cosmesis and voice outcomes. The important limitations to the adoption of robotic thyroidectomy are the difficult technique, high complication rate during the learning curve, and high cost. In addition, cultural differences, longer operative times, and medicolegal issues are a barrier to the diffusion of robotic thyroidectomy. However, remote access robotic thyroidectomy is feasible, and the outcomes are comparable to those of conventional transcervical thyroidectomy if performed by experienced surgeons in highly selected patients. This article reviews the evolution and recent advances in robotic thyroid surgery.

Real Scarless Transoral Robotic Thyroidectomy Using Three Ports Without Axillary Incision

Introduction: Conventional transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) requires an axillary incision and additional flap dissection. This study aimed to outline the first ever experiences with TORT using three ports without axillary incision and compare the results between three-port and four-port TORT. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 consecutive patients were enrolled. The study sample comprised 47 patients who underwent four-port TORT from November 2016 to June 2017, and 53 patients who underwent three-port TORT from September 2018 to June 2019. The indication of the three-port TORT was the anterior/posterior length of the thyroid <1.8 cm and mass size <1.5 cm. Results: Operative time (minutes) was shorter in the three-port group (166.3 ± 35.4 versus 138.5 ± 34.4, P = .005). Hospital stay (days) was also shorter in the three-port group (3.8 ± 0.4 versus 2.4 ± 0.6, P = .003). TORT using three ports yielded a higher cosmetic satisfaction (3.68 ± 0.52 versus 3.89 ± 0.30, P = .002). Postoperative complications, level of calcium, parathyroid hormone, and pain were not significantly different between the groups. Conclusions: Our study showed that three-port TORT was associated with a shorter operative time, hospital stay, and excellent cosmesis than the conventional four-port option. In conclusion, TORT using three ports is a comparable and an effective operation method as a real scarless operation.

Real impact of surgical robotic system for precision surgery of parotidectomy: retroauricular parotidectomy using da Vinci surgical system

Background

We performed robotic parotidectomy with or without robotic neck dissection via a retroauricular approach in patients with parotid benign and malignant tumors and analyzed treatment outcomes of the patients to evaluate the safety and feasibility of robotic parotidectomy.

Methods

Between January 2017 and July 2018, 53 patients received robotic parotidectomy with/without robotic neck dissection through a remote access retroauricular incision without a preauricular incision.

Results

All operations were successfully performed in all patients without significant perioperative complications or tumor spillage. Tumors were located in the superficial lobe of the parotid gland in 40 patients, and the remaining 13 tumors were located in the deep lobe of the parotid gland. Postoperative pathologic examination revealed benign tumor in 32 patients and malignant tumors in 18 patients. The mean operation time was 226 minutes in patients who underwent only parotidectomy and 375 minutes in patients who underwent parotidectomy with robotic neck dissection. The average amount of bleeding was 23 mL, and the amount of drainage after operation averaged 171 mL. The average length of hospital stay was 6 days. Postoperative complications were limited to transient facial paralysis in three patients, all of which resolved within 1 month. All patients were satisfied with their cosmetic results at 6 months after operation.

Conclusions

Robotic parotidectomy with/without robotic neck dissection through a retroauricular approach was a feasible and safe technique in patients with parotid benign and malignant tumor. Specifically, we found it to be helpful in young patients with malignant parotid tumors who should receive cervical lymphadenectomy and parotidectomy, because it does not leave a visible scar on the face or neck. In the future, long-term follow-up will be necessary to validate its oncologic safety and functional outcomes.

Establishing the robotic surgery procedure and techniques for head and neck tumors: a single surgeon's experience of 945 cases

We suggested operative techniques and indications of robotic neck surgery. To determine operative techniques and the indications for robotic neck surgery, we analyzed treatment outcomes of patients who received robotic neck surgery. Between May 2010 and July 2018, a total of 945 patients with various neck diseases visited Severance Hospital and underwent robotic neck surgery. A variety of approaches, including the retroauricular approach (RA), modified facelift approach (MFLA), transaxillary approach (TA), and transaxillary retroauricular approach (TARA), was used to remove various tumors in the neck. A total of 235 patients underwent a robotic neck dissection (elective or therapeutic) in the treatment of head and neck cancer with metastatic cervical lymph nodes. Five hundred-seventeen patients underwent robotic thyroidectomy or parathyroidectomy for thyroid or parathyroid disease, respectively. The remaining 193 patients underwent robotic neck surgery in the treatment of other neck diseases. Various neck lesions were successfully excised using RA or MFLA (including salivary gland tumors, thyroid tumors, vascular tumors, neurogenic tumors, lipomas, lymphangiomas, venous malformations, dermoid cysts, and others). Robotic neck surgery is a feasible and safe technique for the resection of various head and neck tumors. This method could be particularly useful in young patients with thyroid tumors, salivary gland tumors, and vascular tumors, among others, because it does not leave a visible scar on the face or neck. The superior visualization and articulate robotic arm that moves freely at various angles allows surgeons to perform delicate and precise surgeries.

Analysis of neuromonitoring signal loss during retroauricular versus conventional thyroidectomy

OBJECTIVE

Loss of signal (LOS) during intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) of robotic or endoscopic thyroidectomy via a retroauricular approach (RAT) and during conventional open thyroidectomy (COT) was investigated to compare the risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury between the two groups.

STUDY DESIGN

Original article.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case series study performed between May 2014 and September 2016. IONM using the NIM 3.0 system (Medtronic Xomed, Inc., Jacksonville, FL) was used for this study. Pre- and postoperative vocal cord functions were assessed using a flexible laryngoscope. LOS types noted intraoperatively and their associations with postoperative vocal cord palsy (VCP) were evaluated. LOS rate and temporary and permanent VCP rates were compared between the two groups. The surgical events associated with LOS were also documented and analyzed in this study.

RESULTS

In total, 153 patients were recruited, and 111 patients were enrolled in the RAT group; the remaining 42 patients were enrolled in the COT group. No statistically significant differences in intraoperative LOS (P = 0.812) and postoperative VCP rates (early, permanent; P = 0.259 and P = 0.577, respectively) between the two groups were observed. IONM accuracy of predicting postoperative VCP was 99.1% in our case series.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of IONM findings, the risks of injury to RLN were similar between the two groups. Comparison of LOS was an objective method for verifying the novel RAT approach. We applied our IONM protocol and troubleshooting algorithm during RAT with acceptable accuracy, but the international standardized method of IONM is applicable and recommended for reducing false results using vagal nerve stimulation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3b Laryngoscope, 129:2199-2204, 2019.

Fluorescence imaging-guided robotic thyroidectomy and central lymph node dissection

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of complete central compartment node dissection (CCND) using fluorescence imaging (FI) during robotic thyroidectomy.

METHODS

A total of 110 patients underwent robotic thyroidectomy and CCND from August 2015 to June 2016; 55 patients underwent robotic surgery using FI (FI group) and the other 55 patients without it (control group). The FI group was injected with indocyanine green into the thyroid to enhance the identification of lymph nodes (LNs).

RESULTS

Indocyanine green-stained LNs were easily detected using FI. The number of harvested LNs was 7.0 in the FI group and 4.8 in the control group (P = 0.004). There was lower rate of transient hypocalcemia in the FI group (18.5%) than control group (26.7%), but there was no significant difference (P = 0.417). There were no other significant differences between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of FI during robotic thyroidectomy facilitated the identification of LNs and guided complete CCND.

Robotic and Endoscopic Thyroid Surgery: Evolution and Advances

To minimize surgical morbidity and neck scarring, minimally invasive thyroidectomy and robotic/endoscopic thyroidectomy via cervical, axillary, anterior chest, breast, postauricular or transoral approaches have been developed over the past 20 years. In this article, we review the evolution of robotic and endoscopic thyroid surgery and recent advances. Among remote access approaches, the gasless transaxillary approach, bilateral axillo-breast approach, postauricular facelift approach, and transoral vestibular approach are in common use today. Each procedure has its own advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, we need to understand these advantages and limitations, and to select the appropriate method for each patient. The most significant advantage of remote access thyroidectomy is its excellent cosmesis. The complication rate is similar in patients undergoing a remote access approach and those undergoing conventional surgery if the former is performed by experienced surgeons. Operative time is significantly longer in remote access thyroidectomy. In conclusion, remote access thyroidectomy is feasible and its outcomes are comparable to those of conventional transcervical thyroidectomy in highly selected patients.

A comparison study of the transoral and bilateral axillo-breast approaches in robotic thyroidectomy

OBJECTIVES

Transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) is a new remote access approach to avoid cervical incision. The purpose of this study is to compare two approaches used to avoid cervical incision: transoral approach and bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) in robotic thyroidectomy.

METHODS

A total of 90 patients were enrolled prospectively between September 2016 and April 2017. The BABA group had 43 and the TORT group had 47 patients, respectively. Parameters including clinicopathologic data, operative time, complications, laboratory data, hospital stay, postoperative pain, and cosmetic satisfaction were analyzed.

RESULTS

Complications were not different among the two groups. The operative time of TORT was longer than BABA until 15 cases of TORT were completed, but there was no difference after that. The Visual Analogue Scale score in TORT was lower than BABA in all the periods. TORT showed a higher cosmetic satisfaction after surgery. There was no infection or permanent mental nerve hypoesthesia in TORT.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that TORT had less postoperative pain and a greater cosmetic satisfaction than the BABA. There were no significant differences in the postoperative surgical results between the two groups. TORT was comparable to the BABA in outcome with higher cosmetic satisfaction and less pain.

Variations and results of retroauricular robotic thyroid surgery associated or not with neck dissection

Background

Technological advances in the last decades allowed significant evolution in head and neck surgery toward less invasive procedures, with better esthetic and functional outcomes, without compromising oncologic soundness. Although robotic thyroid surgery has been performed for some years now and several published series reported its safety and feasibility, it remains the center of significant controversy. This study shows the results of a case series of robotic thyroid surgery, combined or not with robotic neck dissection.

Methods

A retrospective cohort including 48 cases of robotic thyroid surgery with or without neck dissection, using retroauricular or combined approaches, performed in a tertiary cancer center, comprised the study.

Results

Between 2015 and 2017, we performed 2,769 thyroid surgical procedures, of which 48 (1.7%) were robot-assisted, in 46 patients [26 hemithyroidectomies, 7 total thyroidectomies, and 12 total thyroidectomies (or totalization) with selective neck dissection (SND) II-VI; and 3 neck dissections for thyroid carcinoma]. There were 43 (89.6%) women, and the median age was 35 years. The mean hospital stay was 1.9 days. In 3 (6.2%) cases, drains were not placed (hemithyroidectomies), whereas the other 45 (93.8%) cases had a mean drain stay of 4.4 days (range, 1-9 days). The console time (robotic thyroid resection and neck dissection) ranged from 11 to 200 min (mean 66.1 min; median 40 min), and the total operating room time ranged from 80 to 440 min (mean 227.9 min; median 170 min). Three (6.2%) patients had transient vocal cord paresis. Transient hypocalcemia was reported in three cases (6.2%). There were 30 carcinomas (62.5%), and the mean number of retrieved lymph nodes (LNs) (considering only cases that included robotic neck dissection) was 27.2 (range, 17-40). The mean follow-up time was 17.4 months (range, 1.4-31.9 months), and no recurrence was diagnosed.

Conclusions

The quality outcomes and complication rates are comparable to the conventional approaches. Therefore, robotic thyroidectomy can be an option for selected patients that are motivated to avoid a visible neck scar, treated in high-volume centers. For the patients who require lateral neck dissection, the retroauricular robotic approach could be even more attractive, especially for young patients.

Initiating a Robotic Thyroidectomy Program in India

Robotic surgery has been successfully used for many surgical indications in head and neck surgery. Robotic thyroidectomy is getting accepted worldwide, but the majority of the literature is from South Korea. The purpose of the paper is to review and give a personal perspective on how a robotic thyroidectomy program was initiated in a tertiary care academic medical institution in India. Advantages of robotic approaches are the three-dimensional visualization, precision, dexterity, and surgeon ergonomics. Cost is an important concern. Training includes basic robotics skill training, cadaveric training, observership, and hands-on training. Sufficient preclinical and clinical training is essential before embarking onto the newer surgical modality. Surgeon credentialing, though institution dependent, has specific guidelines. Case selection is the key, especially in the initial learning curve. The authors prefer the retroauricular approach for robotic thyroidectomy, and our initial experience in the first ten cases of total thyroidectomy was encouraging.

[Robotic Surgery - Who is The Boss?]

In the head and neck region, great potential is seen in robot-assisted surgery (RAS). Mainly in cancer surgery, the use of robotic systems seems to be of interest. Until today, two robotic systems (DaVinci® und FLEX®) have gained approval for clinical use in the head and neck region, and multiple other systems are currently in pre-clinical testing. Although, certain groups of patients may benefit from RAS, no unbiased randomized clinical studies are available. Until today, it was not possible to satisfactorily prove any advantage of RAS as compared to standard procedures. The limited clinical benefit and the additional financial burden seem to be the main reasons, why the comprehensive application of RAS has not been realized so far.This review article describes the large variety of clinical applications for RAS in the head and neck region. In addition, the financial and technical challenges, as well as ongoing developments of RAS are highlighted. Special focus is put on risks associated with RAS and current clinical studies. We believe, that RAS will find its way into clinical routine during the next years. Therefore, medical staff will have to increasingly face the technical, scientific and ethical features of RAS.

Remote Access Robotic Facelift Thyroidectomy: A Multi-institutional Experience

BACKGROUND

Robotic facelift thyroidectomy (RFT) was developed as a new surgical approach to the thyroid gland using a remote incision site. Early favorable results led to this confirmatory multi-institutional experience.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data on consecutive patients undergoing RFT in five North American academic endocrine surgical practices were compiled. Surgical indications, operative times, final pathology, nodule size, complications, and postoperative management (drain use and length of hospital stay) were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 102 RFT procedures were undertaken in 90 patients. All but one of the patients (98.9 %) were female, and the mean age was 41.9 ± 13.1 years (range 12-69 years). The indication for surgery was nodular disease in 91.2 % of cases; 8.8 % were completion procedures performed for a diagnosis of cancer. The mean size of the largest nodule was 1.9 cm (range 0-5.6 cm). The mean total operative time for a thyroid lobectomy was 162 min (range 82-265 min). No permanent complications occurred. There were 4 cases (3.9 %) of transient recurrent laryngeal nerve weakness, no cases of hypocalcemia, and 3 (2.9 %) hematomas. There were no conversions to an anterior cervical approach. The majority of patients were managed on an outpatient basis (61.8 %) and without a drain (65.7 %).

CONCLUSIONS

RFT is technically feasible and safe in selected patients. RFT can continue to be offered to carefully selected patients as a way to avoid a visible cervical scar. Future prospective studies to compare this novel approach to other remote access approaches are warranted.

Recent progress of retroauricular robotic thyroidectomy with the new surgical robotic system

OBJECTIVE

Previously, we have reported the feasibility of retroauricular (RA) robotic thyroidectomy. Despite its promising surgical outcomes, there were certain intrinsic mechanical limitations inherent to the da Vinci Si System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, California, U.S.A.). Since the advent of an upgraded model, the Xi System (Intuitive Surgical), we have actively incorporated the new model into performing RA thyroidectomy. Here, we intend to verify the feasibility of RA robotic thyroidectomy using the new da Vinci Xi System (Intuitive Surgical) with comparison of the former Si-applied surgery (Intuitive Surgical).

STUDY DESIGN

Comparative analysis.

METHODS

There were total 165 consecutive patients who received RA robotic thyroidectomy from January 2013 to February 2016. The patients were divided into two groups: Si group (n = 125) and Xi group (n = 40). Perioperative and treatment outcomes were compared and analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared with the previous system, new da Vinci Xi system (Intuitive Surgical) enabled insertion of an extra third robotic instrumental arm. Unlike the previous robotic surgical technique, the robotic dissection could be initiated immediately after the establishment of working space and the resulting total operation time could be significantly decreased. There was no difference in the surgical completeness, as confirmed by postoperative thyroglobulin levels. Additionally, flexed EndoWrist (Intuitive Surgical) instruments equipped with the Erbe (Erbe USA Inc., Marietta, Georgia, U.S.A.) system could be mounted, which further facilitated the operation. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The RA robotic thyroidectomy with the new Xi System (Intuitive Surgical) can greatly facilitate the robotic surgery with comparable or improved surgical outcomes. Its application is expected to open up a new era of robotic neck surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4. Laryngoscope, 128:1730-1737, 2018.

Robotic retroauricular thyroidectomy: initial experience from India

Robotic thyroidectomy is getting accepted worldwide, but, majority of the literature is from South Korea. The purpose of this paper is to review the early experiences with robotic retroauricular (RA) thyroidectomy from India. The rationale for robotic thyroidectomy, its advantages and disadvantages are reviewed. The reasons for selecting the RA approach and the criteria used for selecting the patients are discussed. The early experience and outcomes of 29 patients, from three centres across India is presented. Robotic approaches score above endoscopic methods. RA approach may have some technical advantages for the head and neck surgeons. Sufficient cadaver and preclinical training should be undertaken. Standardized and formal teaching for robotic surgical skill is necessary. Case selection is important especially in the initial phases of the learning curve. Our early experience with robotic thyroidectomy was encouraging.

Robotic surgical systems in maxillofacial surgery: a review

Throughout the twenty-first century, robotic surgery has been used in multiple oral surgical procedures for the treatment of head and neck tumors and non-malignant diseases. With the assistance of robotic surgical systems, maxillofacial surgery is performed with less blood loss, fewer complications, shorter hospitalization and better cosmetic results than standard open surgery. However, the application of robotic surgery techniques to the treatment of head and neck diseases remains in an experimental stage, and the long-lasting effects on surgical morbidity, oncologic control and quality of life are yet to be established. More well-designed studies are needed before this approach can be recommended as a standard treatment paradigm. Nonetheless, robotic surgical systems will inevitably be extended to maxillofacial surgery. This article reviews the current clinical applications of robotic surgery in the head and neck region and highlights the benefits and limitations of current robotic surgical systems.

Overview of robotic thyroidectomy

With the advancement and adaptation of technology, there has been a tremendous evolution in the surgical approaches for thyroidectomy. Robotic thyroidectomy has become increasingly popular worldwide attracting both surgeons and patients searching for new and innovative techniques for thyroidectomy with a superior cosmetic result when compared to the conventional open procedures. In this review, we describe the following surgical approaches for robotic thyroidectomy: transaxillary, retroauricular (facelift) and transoral. The advantages and disadvantages as well as limitations of each approach are examined, and future directions of robotic thyroidectomy are discussed.

Robotic retroauricular thyroid surgery

Surgery is the gold standard treatment for patients with thyroid cancer or nodules suspicious for cancer. Open conventional approach is the standard surgical approach. However, a visible neck incision could be a concern for most young female patients, especially for patients with a history of healing with keloid or hypertrophic scars. Robotic remote access approaches have evolved into a safe and feasible approach in selected patients, providing a hidden scar with good patient satisfaction. This review will focus on the performance and safety of robotic retroauricular thyroid surgery.

Robotic versus Open Thyroidectomy for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: An Evidence-Based Review

While open thyroidectomy (OT) is advocated as the gold standard treatment for differentiated thyroid cancer, the contemporary use of robotic thyroidectomy (RT) is often controversial. Although RT combines the unique benefits of the surgical robot and remote access thyroidectomy, its applicability on cancer patients is challenged by the questionable oncological benefits and safety. This review aims to analyze the current literature evidence in comparing RT to OT on thyroid cancers for their perioperative and oncological outcomes. To date, no randomized controlled trial is available in comparing RT to OT. All published studies are nonrandomized or retrospective comparisons. Current data suggests that RT compares less favorably than OT for longer operative time, higher cost, and possibly inferior oncological control with lower number of central lymph nodes retrieved. In terms of morbidity, quality of life outcomes, and short-term recurrence rates, RT and OT are comparable. While conventional OT continues to be appropriate for most thyroid cancers, RT should better be continued by expert surgeons on selected patients who have low-risk thyroid cancers and have high expectations on cosmetic outcomes. Future research should embark on prospective randomized studies for unbiased comparisons. Long-term follow-up studies are also needed to evaluate outcomes on recurrence and survival.