Effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol on the key endotypes of OSA: A randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced sleep has been shown to facilitate the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, the effects of commonly used sedatives, such as dexmedetomidine and propofol, on the endotypic traits of OSA remained unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to investigate the impact of dexmedetomidine and propofol on OSA endotypic traits.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial in adult patients with OSA, comparing the OSA endotypic traits and polysomnography parameters among the interventions of placebo, dexmedetomidine and propofol.

RESULTS

16 patients completed the trial and were enrolled for analysis. Both dexmedetomidine and propofol worsened pharyngeal collapsibility as indicated by a lower Vpassive (mean difference: 6.1 [95 % CI -9.1 to -3.0]%eupnea for dexmedetomidine versus placebo, p = 0.040; -16.5 [95 % CI -24.1 to -9.0]%eupnea for propofol versus placebo, p < 0.001), with propofol causing a greater effect (-10.4 [95 % CI -17.8 to -3.2]%eupnea for propofol versus dexmedetomidine, p < 0.001). Dexmedetomidine maintained upper airway gain, while propofol diminished it compared to placebo (p = 0.001). Both dexmedetomidine and propofol increased arousal threshold (p = 0.006 and p < 0.001, respectively). Dexmedetomidine had no effect on loop gain, whereas propofol elevated it (p = 0.004). Compared to placebo, dexmedetomidine had no impact on apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) or saturation of peripheral oxygen (SpO2). During propofol sedation, AHI in stages N1 (p < 0.001), N2 (p < 0.001) and the entire NREM (p = 0.038) sleep showed increases, and nadir SpO2 for NREM stage exhibited a decrease (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Dexmedetomidine had less impact on OSA endotypic traits compared to propofol, and had no negative effects on AHI and SpO2.

Evaluation of Sleep Stages Using Electroencephalogram, Electrooculogram, and Electromyogram Findings During Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy in Paediatric Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

INTRODUCTION

Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is a valuable tool for the assessment of the upper airway in paediatric obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). General anaesthesia induces sleep-like conditions during DISE; however, there is limited understanding of the neurophysiological aspects of this sleep. We conducted a prospective cohort pilot study recording electroencephalogram (EEG), electrooculogram (EOG) and electromyogram (EMG) data in paediatric OSA patients during DISE.

OBJECTIVES

Demonstrate the safety and feasibility of collecting sleep stages during DISE in paediatric patients with OSA. Characterise sleep stages of paediatric OSA patients undergoing DISE.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort pilot study.

SETTING

Academic medical centre.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients between two (2) and 18 years old (inclusive) with a history of OSA and preoperative polysomnography (PSG) were recruited. Patients with known craniofacial abnormalities were excluded. Non-English or non-Spanish speaking subjects were excluded.

RESULTS

We recruited 13 subjects aged 3 to 13 years old. EEG, EOG, and EMG data was collected during the DISE procedure. Raw data was scored by a board-certified sleep medicine physician. Six subjects experienced N1 sleep, 12 subjects experienced N2 sleep, and 5 subjects experienced N3 sleep. Most subjects spent the majority of their time in N2 sleep. No subjects experienced REM sleep. The primary intravenous sedative agent used was dexmedetomidine.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study gives the first insight into sleep stages of paediatric OSA patients undergoing DISE. Additional investigation of the neurophysiology and the effects of different intravenous anaesthetics during the DISE procedure is warranted.

A Clinical Comparative Study of Schnider and Eleveld Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Models for Propofol Target-Controlled Infusion Sedation in Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy

Background: Optimizing sedative techniques for drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) enhances accuracy and reproducibility in tailoring treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The Schnider and Eleveld pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) models, which predict propofol concentration in effect-site compartment based on patient-specific parameters, were utilized to guide intravenous sedation in this study. We compared the effectiveness of propofol sedation guided by the novel general-purpose Eleveld model versus the Schnider model using target-controlled infusion (TCI) systems. Methods: We investigated twenty-five adult OSA patients, randomized into two groups: the Schnider model group (n = 12) and the Eleveld model group (n = 13). DISE was conducted following standardized protocols, targeting effect-site concentration TCI mode. Data concerning sedation levels, effect-site concentration of propofol, procedural timing, propofol dosages, respiratory and cardiovascular parameters, and any procedural incidents were collected. Results: DISE was performed successfully in all enrolled patients from both groups. A significant difference was observed in the effect-site concentration of propofol (CeP) at the moment of endoscopy between the Eleveld and Schnider groups (2.1 ± 0.4 µg/mL vs. 3.3 ± 0.7 µg/mL, respectively; p < 0.001). The E group also demonstrated a shorter time to attain the optimal sedation plane compared to the S group (6.1 ± 1.7 vs. 9.8 ± 2.2 min, respectively; p < 0.001) and a reduced total procedural time (11.2 ± 1.4 vs. 15.0 ± 2.1 min, respectively; p < 0.001). The incidence of adverse events was comparable between groups. Conclusions: The Eleveld model demonstrated a shorter time to achieve the optimal sedation plane, a shorter total procedural time, and a significant difference in effect-site concentration at the time of endoscopy compared to the Schnider model. The incidence of adverse events was comparable between the two groups, suggesting that the Eleveld model may offer improved efficiency without compromising safety during DISE.

Characterization of Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Undergoing Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy: A Retrospective Study of Nine Years (2014-2022)

INTRODUCTION

 Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is the most prevalent sleep-related breathing disorder associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular complications. Identifying the anatomical sites of airway obstruction is crucial for optimizing treatment, particularly in patients requiring surgical intervention. In recent years, drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) has emerged as a valuable diagnostic tool for evaluating upper airway obstruction in OSAS patients.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the OSAS population undergoing DISE and correlate endoscopic findings with patient characteristics and obstruction sites.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 A retrospective study was conducted by reviewing medical records of patients who underwent DISE between 2014 and 2022 at Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira, Guimarães. The analyzed variables included age, gender, body mass index (BMI), apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), and the level and pattern of obstruction based on the velum, oropharynx, tongue, and epiglottis (VOTE) classification. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics v27.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, USA).

RESULTS

 A total of 71 patients underwent DISE, with ages ranging from 25 to 68 years. The majority were male (84%, n=60). Regarding BMI distribution, 18.3% (n=13) of patients were classified as obese, 67.6% (n=48) as overweight, and 14.1% (n=10) had a normal weight. Most patients had moderate OSAS (56.3%, n=40), followed by severe (26.8%, n=19) and mild OSAS (16.9%, n=12). A significant positive correlation was observed between AHI and BMI (p=0.028). Multilevel obstruction was identified in 75% of patients, with the most common collapse site being the soft palate, followed by the oropharynx, base of the tongue, and epiglottis. No statistically significant differences were found in the obstruction site, pattern, or severity based on AHI or BMI. However, at the palatal level, a positive trend was observed between AHI and obstruction severity (r=0.153; p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

 DISE is a safe and reliable diagnostic modality for identifying upper airway collapse sites, revealing anatomical alterations that may not be apparent during standard physical examination. This technique plays a crucial role in evaluating patients considered for surgical intervention or those who have not responded to first-line therapies. DISE enables a personalized approach to OSAS management by tailoring treatment strategies to individual patient anatomy and obstruction patterns.

The Impact of Diagnostic Imaging on Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Feedback from a Narrative Review

Obstructive Sleep Apnea is a prevalent sleep disorder characterized by repeated episodes of partial or complete upper airway obstruction during sleep, leading to disrupted sleep and associated comorbidities. Effective, traditional diagnostic methods, such as polysomnography, have limitations in providing comprehensive anatomical detail. Recent advancements in imaging technology have the potential to revolutionize the diagnosis and management of OSA, offering detailed insights into airway anatomy, function, and dynamics. This paper explores the latest innovations in imaging modalities, including high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging, functional MRI, three-dimensional airway reconstructions, and the integration of artificial intelligence algorithms for enhanced image analysis. We discuss the potential of these technologies to improve the precision of OSA diagnosis, tailor treatment strategies, and predict treatment outcomes. Moreover, we examine the challenges of implementing these advanced imaging techniques in clinical practice, such as cost, accessibility, and the need for validation in diverse patient populations. We also consider the ethical implications of widespread imaging, particularly regarding data security and patient privacy. The future of OSA management is poised for transformation as these imaging technologies promise to provide a more nuanced understanding of the disorder and facilitate personalized treatment approaches. This paper calls for continued research and collaboration across disciplines to ensure these innovations lead to improved patient care and outcomes in the field of sleep medicine.

Transoral Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy: A Useful Complementary Tool in Sleep Surgery

Introduction  Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is performed widely, and several studies have demonstrated its validity as it provides clinical information not available by routine clinical inspection alone. Objective  This study aims to evaluate the role of transoral drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) in the evaluation of tongue-palate (TP) interaction and its impact on surgical outcomes. Methods  A total of 42 patients with known obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) were classified into two groups according to TP interaction (the absence of space between tongue and palate with the visual impression that the tongue is pushing the soft palate) into +ve and -ve TP interaction. Snoring according to the visual analogue scale (VAS), the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and sleep study data were recorded before and after the pharyngoplasty operation. Results  There was a statistically significant difference between studied groups postoperative regarding minimal oxygen saturation, snoring index, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), the ESS, and visual analogue scale of snoring ( p  = 0.003*, p  < 0.001*, p  < 0.001*, p  = 0.004*, and p  = 0.003*, respectively). It displayed a marked higher average improvement among cases with -ve than in those with +ve TP interaction in terms of snoring index, AHI, and ESS. Conclusion  The Transoral DISE Has A Valuable Role In Evaluating And Assessing TP Interaction And Its Importance On Surgical Outcomes. Cases With Positive TP Interaction Show Poor Response To Isolated Palatopharyngeal Expansion And Need Further Analysis To Create A Better Treatment Plan And Improve Outcomes.

Study of Two Sedative Protocols for Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy: Propofol versus Propofol-Remifentanil Combination, Delivered in Target-Controlled Infusion Mode

Background and Objectives: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent sleep-disordered breathing pathology with significant clinical consequences, including increased cardiovascular risk and cognitive decline. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the gold-standard treatment, but alternative strategies are sometimes needed for patients intolerant to CPAP. Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is a key diagnostic tool for assessing upper airway obstruction in OSA patients and subsequently tailoring a surgical approach, with sedation protocols playing a crucial role in its efficacy and results accuracy. This study aimed to investigate the effect of adding remifentanil to a propofol target-controlled infusion (TCI) regimen on the sedation parameters and procedural outcomes of DISE. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted at the Central University and Emergency Military Hospital "Dr. Carol Davila" and Ria Clinic in Bucharest between July 2021 and October 2023. Thirty-one patients were enrolled and randomised into two groups: a propofol group (P group, n= 11) and a remifentanil-propofol group (R-P group, n = 20). DISE was performed using standardised protocols, sedative drugs were administered in TCI mode, and data on sedation levels, respiratory and cardiovascular parameters, and procedural incidents were collected. Results: The addition of remifentanil at 1 ng/mL effect-site concentration significantly reduced the effect-site concentration of propofol required for adequate sedation (3.4 ± 0.7 µg/mL in the P group vs. 2.8 ± 0.6 µg/mL in the R-P group, p = 0.035). The time to achieve adequate sedation was also shorter in the R-P group (7.1 ± 2.5 min vs. 9.5 ± 2.7 min, p = 0.017). The incidence of cough, hypoxemia, and cardiovascular events did not significantly differ between the two groups. Conclusions: Adding remifentanil to a propofol TCI regimen for DISE effectively reduces the required propofol effect-site concentration and shortens sedation time without increasing the risk of adverse events. This combination may enhance the safety and efficiency of DISE, offering a promising alternative for patients undergoing this procedure.

Pediatric Down Syndrome Upper Airway Stimulation: Patient Selection and Post-Implantation Optimization

OBJECTIVE

The Food and Drug Administration recently approved upper airway stimulation (UAS) for children with Down Syndrome and persistent obstructive sleep apnea who meet certain inclusion and exclusion criteria. Although there is a robust experience with this therapy in the adult population, established protocols used in adults are not directly transferrable to a complex pediatric population. This review aims to combine the protocols from several institutions for patient selection and postimplantation optimization, including a protocol for Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy in children with Down Syndrome, preactivation threshold measurements, device titration, and follow-up sleep studies.

STUDY DESIGN

Expert panel development of best Practice algorithm.

SETTING

Multi-institutional investigator review.

METHODS

An expert panel was assembled of pediatric otolaryngologists with extensive experience in hypoglossal nerve stimulation in children with Down Syndrome. Thirty statements were created during an initial drafting session. A modified Delphi method was used assess consensus among the panel.

RESULTS

After 2 rounds of Delphi surveys, 29 statements met criteria for consensus. One statement did not meet consensus. The statements were grouped into several categories to facilitate presentation.

CONCLUSIONS

A standardized approach to UAS for children with Down Syndrome must take into account the unique challenges inherent to treating a complex pediatric population with a high rate of sensory processing disorders. This expert panel has met consensus on several statements that will guide clinicians as this novel therapy is adopted.

Efficacy of high-flow nasal oxygen during drug-induced sleep endoscopy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea

PURPOSE

High-flow nasal oxygenation (HFNO) can provide a low level of continuous positive airway pressure and alveolar recruitment. We aimed to compare the efficacy of pre-oxygenation with HFNO and low-flow nasal oxygenation (LFNO) during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE).

METHODS

In the LFNO group, preoxygenation was performed for 10 min at 3 L·min-1. In the HFNO group, preoxygenation was performed for 10 min at 30 L·min-1 at a fraction of inspired oxygen of 100% using the Optiflow device. From the start of sedative administration to the end of DISE, vital signs were monitored continuously. The primary outcome was the lowest oxygen saturation (SpO2) during DISE.

RESULTS

Of 24 patients enrolled, 12 were randomly assigned to the LFNO and 12 to the HFNO groups. The prevalence of hypoxia events was 75% in the LFNO group and 58% in the HFNO group. The difference in lowest oxygen saturation between the two groups was not significant between the two groups (P=0.665). The lowest SpO2 during all procedures was comparable between the two groups (86.8 ± 6.5% in the LFNO group and 87.2 ± 8.0% in the HFNO group; P=0.912).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that HFNO may not be superior to LFNO as a preoxygenation tool to prevent hypoxia during DISE.

International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea

BACKGROUND

Evaluation and interpretation of the literature on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) allows for consolidation and determination of the key factors important for clinical management of the adult OSA patient. Toward this goal, an international collaborative of multidisciplinary experts in sleep apnea evaluation and treatment have produced the International Consensus statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (ICS:OSA).

METHODS

Using previously defined methodology, focal topics in OSA were assigned as literature review (LR), evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBR-R) formats. Each topic incorporated the available and relevant evidence which was summarized and graded on study quality. Each topic and section underwent iterative review and the ICS:OSA was created and reviewed by all authors for consensus.

RESULTS

The ICS:OSA addresses OSA syndrome definitions, pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors for disease, screening methods, diagnostic testing types, multiple treatment modalities, and effects of OSA treatment on multiple OSA-associated comorbidities. Specific focus on outcomes with positive airway pressure (PAP) and surgical treatments were evaluated.

CONCLUSION

This review of the literature consolidates the available knowledge and identifies the limitations of the current evidence on OSA. This effort aims to create a resource for OSA evidence-based practice and identify future research needs. Knowledge gaps and research opportunities include improving the metrics of OSA disease, determining the optimal OSA screening paradigms, developing strategies for PAP adherence and longitudinal care, enhancing selection of PAP alternatives and surgery, understanding health risk outcomes, and translating evidence into individualized approaches to therapy.

Objective Pharyngeal Phenotyping in Obstructive Sleep Apnea With High-Resolution Manometry

OBJECTIVE

Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is a commonly used diagnostic tool for surgical procedural selection in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but it is expensive, subjective, and requires sedation. Here we present an initial investigation of high-resolution pharyngeal manometry (HRM) for upper airway phenotyping in OSA, developing a software system that reliably predicts pharyngeal sites of collapse based solely on manometric recordings.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cross-sectional study.

SETTING

An academic sleep medicine and surgery practice.

METHODS

Forty participants underwent simultaneous HRM and DISE. A machine learning algorithm was constructed to estimate pharyngeal level-specific severity of collapse, as determined by an expert DISE reviewer. The primary outcome metrics for each level were model accuracy and F1-score, which balances model precision against recall.

RESULTS

During model training, the average F1-score across all categories was 0.86, with an average weighted accuracy of 0.91. Using a holdout test set of 9 participants, a K-nearest neighbor model trained on 31 participants attained an average F1-score of 0.96 and an average accuracy of 0.97. The F1-score for prediction of complete concentric palatal collapse was 0.86.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that HRM may enable objective and dynamic mapping of the pharynx, opening new pathways toward reliable and reproducible assessment of this complex anatomy in sleep.

The clinical application progress and potential of drug-induced sleep endoscopy in obstructive sleep apnea

Background and Objective: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is characterized by nocturnal repetitive upper airway (UA) collapse. For sleep physicians, the recognition of UA collapse characteristics is critical for understanding OSA mechanisms and developing individualized treatment plans. Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is an exam during simulated sleep that allows the dynamic assessment of the UA of individuals with OSA. The initial recognition of DISE was to locate the sites of UA obstruction and direct the surgical selection of OSA since it was introduced in the 1990s. After approximately 30 years of studies, based on advances in endoscopic operative techniques and innovative treatments of OSA, DISE had been performed to explore mechanisms and comprehensive treatments related to UA collapse. Methods: This article reviewed contemporary DISE advances, including indications and contraindications, technique of induced sleep, endoscopic operation, UA characteristics classification.Results and Conclusions: Precise selection based on the association between collapse patterns and treatment modalities, such as continuous positive airway pressure, oral appliance, positional therapy, robotic surgery and neurostimulator implanting, is the future research prospect based on DISE.Key messagesDISE provides sleep physicians with valuable information about the upper airway collapse characteristics and dynamic changes during sleep.The studies based on DISE findings improve the selectivity and efficiency of treatment modalities, including classical therapies such as continuous positive airway pressure, oral appliance, positional therapy, and innovative therapies such as neurostimulator implanting and robotic surgery, promote the advancement of OSA precision medicine.

Outcome of CPAP Titration for Moderate-to-Severe OSA Under Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial

Background

The titration pressure of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is important in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This study aimed to understand the difference between drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE)-guided CPAP titration and conventional sleep center (CSC) CPAP titration in patients with OSA.

Methods

In this randomized, controlled, and single-blind crossover trial, we compared the effects of 1-month CPAP treatment in patients with OSA with either DISE-guided CPAP titration or CSC CPAP titration. Twenty-four patients with OSA were recruited for the study. All patients underwent polysomnography, DISE-guided CPAP titration, and accommodation. Initially, patients were randomly assigned to receive either DISE-guided CPAP titration or CSC CPAP treatment for the first month. They were then switched to other treatments in the second month. The Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) score was recorded at baseline, 1 and 2 months.

Results

The upper limit of the pressure of DISE-guided titration and CSC CPAP titration was not significantly different (13.9 ± 0.7 vs. 13.5 ± 0.5 cm H₂O; P = 0.92). The residual apnea-hypopnea index and compliance were also not significantly different between the groups. ESS score significantly improved from baseline to 1 month after CPAP treatment in both groups. Both epiglottis (anterior-posterior collapse) and tongue base collapse were significantly associated with 95% CPAP pressure (P = 0.031 and 0.038, respectively). After multivariate regression analyses, the epiglottis (anterior-posterior collapse) was an independent factor for 95% CPAP pressure. The incidence rate of bradycardia was 58.3%, which is a safety concern for DISE. Despite the high incidence of bradycardia, all patients with bradycardia recovered with proper management.

Conclusion

Both modalities were comparable in terms of establishing the pressure settings required to treat patients. Further large-scale studies are required to confirm these results.

Trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/, NCT03523013.

Diagnosis of upper airways collapse in moderate-to-severe OSAHS patients: a comparison between drug-induced sleep endoscopy and the awake examination

PURPOSE

Compare awake evaluation (modified Mallampati score-MMs, Müller maneuver-MM) to drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) findings according to NOHL (nose-oropharynx-hypopharynx-larynx) classification in moderate-to-severe OSAHS patients.

METHODS

43 moderate-to-severe OSAHS patients referred to our ENT department were enrolled over a 2-year period. In this observational prospective study, each patient was evaluated by the same ENT team both in wakefulness and during pharmacologically induced sleep. Level and severity of the obstruction were described.

RESULTS

The comparison of degree of collapsibility was statistically significative only at hypopharyngeal level: 41.8% of the patients showed a hypopharyngeal obstruction in wakefulness whereas 88.3% in DISE (p = 0.000). Laryngeal level was found in 18.6% patients during awake examination, conversely DISE demonstrated laryngeal obstruction in 4.6%. DISE identified significantly higher incidence of multilevel collapses (p = 0.001). However, the incidence of oropharyngeal obstruction in patients classified as MMs I and II was significantly higher in DISE compared to MM (p = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

DISE is the best predictor of hypopharyngeal obstruction, whereas MM underestimates the severity of the collapse at this level. DISE is more reliable than MM to identify the obstruction in patients with MMs score I and II.

Oxygenation strategies during flexible bronchoscopy: a review of the literature

During flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) the arterial partial pressure of oxygen can drop, increasing the risk for respiratory failure. To avoid desaturation episodes during the procedure several oxygenation strategies have been proposed, including conventional oxygen therapy (COT), high flow nasal cannula (HFNC), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV). By a review of the current literature, we merely describe the clinical practice of oxygen therapies during FOB. We also conducted a pooled data analysis with respect to oxygenation outcomes, comparing HFNC with COT and NIV, separately. COT showed its benefits in patients undergoing FOB for broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) or brushing for cytology, in those with peripheral arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation < 93% prior to the procedure or affected by obstructive disorder. HFNC is preferable over COT in patients with mild to moderate acute respiratory failure (ARF) undergoing FOB, by improving oxygen saturation and decreasing the episodes of desaturation. On the opposite, CPAP and NIV guarantee improved oxygenation outcomes as compared to HFNC, and they should be preferred in patients with more severe hypoxemic ARF during FOB.

Sleep Endoscopy Findings in Children With Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Small Tonsils

OBJECTIVE

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) in children is treated primarily with adenotonsillectomy (AT). When clinical exam demonstrates small tonsils, the success of AT in resolving OSA is uncertain. The purpose of this study is to determine the utility of Drug induced Sleep Endoscopy (DISE) for children with OSA and small tonsils (Brodsky scale 1+) and to identify what obstructive trends exist in this subset of patients and to determine the utility of DISE-directed surgical intervention in patients with small tonsils.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed for patients who underwent DISE at a tertiary care center over a 2-year period. Inclusion criteria were 1+ tonsils and a positive sleep study. Data collected included DISE findings, BMI, comorbid conditions, and pre-op PSG data.

RESULTS

Forty children were included with a mean age of 5.0 years (range 8 months-16 years). Mean preoperative AHI was 5.46 and mean oxygen saturation nadir was 87.1%. The most common contributor to airway obstruction was the adenoid (29 patients, 72.5%), followed by the tongue base or lingual tonsil (21 patients, 52.5%). The palatine tonsils (10 patients, 25.0%), epiglottis (10.0%), or obstruction intrinsic to the larynx (10.0%) were significantly less frequently identified as contributors to OSA when compared to the adenoid (P < .001). The majority of patients had multilevel obstruction (25 patients, 62.5%). Adenoidectomy (27 patients, 67.5%) was the most commonly performed procedure, followed by tonsillectomy (10 patients, 25.0%, P < .001) and tongue base surgery (9 patient 22.5%, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

In this group, small palatine tonsils were infrequently identified as a contributor to airway obstruction and tonsillectomy was avoided in most cases. This study illustrates the utility of DISE as a tool to personalize the surgical management of pediatric patients with OSA and small tonsils on physical exam.

Pediatric drug-induced sleep endoscopy: An updated review of the literature

The field of drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) has grown considerably over the last 10∼15 years, to now include its use in pediatric patients. In this review article, we outline our approach to the use of this technology in Children with Airway Obstruction, most specifically in the management of children with airway obstruction and known or suspected adenotonsillar enlargement.

The Quest for a DISE Protocol

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this quality initiative project was to modify our existing institutional drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) protocol so that the surgeon could consistently determine obstructive breathing patterns while minimizing children's discomfort.

METHODS

A quality initiative study utilizing the well-described plan-do-study-act (PDSA) process was conducted at a tertiary hospital for children with polysomnogram-documented obstructive sleep apnea who were undergoing DISE. A 4-point Likert measurement tool was created. Change in each Likert rating with subsequent PDSA cycle was tested with the Wilcoxon rank sum test (Mann-Whitney), and change across all PDSA cycles was tested with the Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank test.

RESULTS

After a series of 4 PDSA cycles with 81 children, the DISE protocol was streamlined from 14 to 9 steps. There was significant improvement for all aspects of the DISE, with a final overall median rating of 1 (excellent) for intravenous (IV) placement, scope insertion, and anesthesiologist and surgeon satisfaction (P < .01).

DISCUSSION

For sleep surgeons, DISE is quickly becoming what bronchoscopy is to the airway surgeon. Utilizing inhalational agents to obtain IV access and insert the flexible scope in the rapid "on-off" fashion optimizes DISE success regardless of the primary sedation medication and allows ample time for these agents to dissipate.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Adoption of a DISE protocol that includes nasal premedication and inhalational volatile gases for IV and scope insertion at the onset provides a more predictable level of sedation that is well tolerated by the patient, enabling the otolaryngologist to create an obstructive sleep apnea treatment plan.

High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy for outpatients undergoing flexible bronchoscopy: a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) provides benefits to patients undergoing flexible bronchoscopy (FOB). We compared the effects of HFNC versus standard therapy (ST) on gas exchange, lung volume and diaphragm function in patients undergoing FOB for bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL).

METHODS

36 outpatients were randomised to ST or HFNC. Arterial blood gases, episodes of severe desaturation, changes of end-expiratory lung impedance (ΔEELI), diaphragm ultrasound were recorded. Measurements were done at baseline (T0), after bronchoscope insertion (T1), at the end of the procedure (T2) and 10 min afterwards (T3).

RESULTS

Arterial partial oxygen pressure (PaO₂) was not different between T0 (10.8 (95% CI 8.7 to 12.0) kPa and T2 (11.1 (95% CI 10.4 to 12.0) kPa) with HFNC, while decreased from 11.1 (95% CI 10.5 to 12.1) to 9.1 (95% CI 8.4 to 9.8) kPa with ST. At T2, PaO₂ was significantly higher with HFNC than with ST (p<0.001). Also, with HFNC, compared with ST, fewer desaturations occurred (11% vs 56%; p<0.01). ΔEELI was no different at the different time points with HFNC, while with ST there was a significant decrease at T1 (-170 (95% CI -382 to -32) mL, p=0.003), T2 (-211 (95% CI -425 to -148) mL, p<0.001) and T3 (-213 (95% CI -398 to -81) mL, p<0.001), as opposed to T0. EELI was lower with ST than HFNC at T1 (p=0.006), T2 (p=0.001) and T3 (p=0.002). Diaphragm displacement was no different between groups (p=0.748), while the thickening fraction significantly increased at T1 and T2 with ST only (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

During FOB for BAL, HFNC improves gas exchange, avoiding loss of end-expiratory lung volume and preventing increase of diaphragm activation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04016480.

Diagnosis of Retrolingual Obstruction during Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy versus Polysomnography with Nasopharyngeal Tube in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea

OBJECTIVE

To compare the retrolingual obstruction during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) with the retrolingual obstruction during polysomnography with nasopharyngeal tube (NPT-PSG).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study of 77 consecutive patients with moderate and severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was conducted. After 15 patients were excluded from the study for not completing DISE or NPT-PSG successfully, 62 patients were included in this study. Retrolingual sites of obstruction grade 2 determined by DISE according to the VOTE (velum, oropharynx lateral wall, tongue base, and epiglottis) classification were considered as retrolingual obstruction, while apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 15 events/hour determined by NPT-PSG was considered as retrolingual obstruction. The extent of agreement between DISE and NPT-PSG findings was evaluated using unweighted Cohen's kappa test.

RESULTS

The 62 study participants (11 moderate OSA, 51 severe OSA) had a mean (SD) age of 39.8 (9.9) years, and 58 (94%) were men. No statistically significant differences between included and excluded patients were observed in patient characteristics. The extent of agreement in retrolingual obstruction between DISE and NPT-PSG was 80.6% (Cohen k = 0.612; 95% CI, 0.415-0.807).

CONCLUSION

Retrolingual obstruction requiring treatment showed good agreement between DISE and NPT-PSG, suggesting that NPT-PSG may also be a reliable method to assess the retrolingual obstruction.

The Use of Middle Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials (MLAEP) as Methodology for Evaluating Sedation Level in Propofol-Drug Induced Sleep Endoscopy (DISE) Procedure

To analyze the middle latency auditory evoked potential index (MLAEPi), compared to the standard bispectral index (BIS), as a method for evaluating the sedation level in drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE). In this controlled clinical study on a sample of 99 obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) or snoring patients, we compared the MLAEPi with the BIS after propofol infusion during the standard DISE technique in order to define the MLAEPi values within the observational window of the procedure. The DISE procedure was divided into eight steps, and we collected both MLAEPi and BIS data values from the same patient in every step. The MLAEPi showed a faster response than the BIS after propofol infusion during DISE. Therefore, the clinical use of the MLAEPi in evaluating the sedation level seems to be a good alternative to the current technological standards.

Dexmedetomidine-induced polysomnography as a diagnostic method in obstructive sleep apnea: a reliable alternative method?

BACKGROUND

Under-diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common because of the demanding and time-consuming nature of polysomnography (PSG). Herein, we assessed the utility of a short daytime dexmedetomidine-induced PSG for diagnosis of OSA in adults.

METHODS

This was a single-center, prospective, diagnostic trial. We evaluated 86 patients using a full overnight PSG and a short diurnal drug-induced PSG (DIPSG). DIPSG was induced by continuous intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion. Sedation depth was monitored and maintained using the Narcotrend index (50-70). Diagnostic performance for DIPSG with different apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) cut-off values were calculated. Bland-Altman plots used for analysis. Sleep architecture and position were compared.

RESULTS

We studied 47 OSA patients and 39 healthy volunteers. Sensitivity and specificity for detection of OSA by DIPSG were 92% and 79%, respectively, for an AHI cut-off value of 5, 90% and 77%, respectively, for an AHI cut-off value of 15, and 95% and 85%, respectively, for an AHI cut-off value of 30. The DIPSG bias was -5 (-25; 15) for AHI and -3 (-13; 7) for minimal oxygen saturation. N2 sleep was increased (32.9% vs. 50.75%, respectively; p < 0.01) and REM sleep was decreased (21.35% vs. 1.24%, respectively; p < 0.01) during DIPSG. Twenty-eight (33%) participants had postural shifts during DIPSG. No significant adverse events were observed during DIPSG.

CONCLUSIONS

Dexmedetomidine-induced PSG had a good sensitivity and specificity, and can be used as a screening tool for diagnosis of OSA in adults.

CHINESE CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR1900024044.

Anesthetic management of children undergoing drug-induced sleep endoscopy: A retrospective review

OBJECTIVE

To determine the best anesthetic technique for DISE based on a retrospective review of the current literature and to highlight research gaps that should be addressed in future studies.

METHODS

A comprehensive retrospective review of the literature on anesthetic regimens for pediatric DISE through March 2020 was performed. Specific medical subject heading (MesH) terms included: drug-induced sleep endoscopy and anesthesia, DISE, child, obstructive sleep apnea, sleep disordered breathing.

RESULTS

Twelve articles were included. One study was a retrospective comparative study while the remaining 11 were case series. Five studies described anesthetic technique for DISE pre-T&A, two post-T&A, and four both pre- and post-T&A. The heterogeneity of the studies did not allow for a meta-analysis. A total of 1110 children ages 2 months to 19 years were included. Sedation depth and anesthetic outcomes with DISE were infrequently described. Eleven studies used a sevoflurane inhalational induction and mostly transitioned to a total IV anesthetic for maintenance. Propofol was the most commonly used sole anesthetic. A total of three studies used a combination of remifentanil and propofol, one used dexmedetomidine alone, one used sevoflurane alone, and one compared different regimens. Dexmedetomidine and ketamine have the most favorable profile for pediatric DISE but are not universally used. DISE completion, as reported in two studies, was 93% and 100%.

CONCLUSION

There are several anesthetic regimens for DISE that achieve good sedation and outcomes. The combination of ketamine and dexmedetomidine may be the ideal regimen. Limited data and lack of protocols/high-quality studies exist on anesthetic regimens for pediatric DISE.

International Pediatric Otolaryngology group (IPOG) consensus on the diagnosis and management of pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)

OBJECTIVE

To develop an expert-based consensus of recommendations for the diagnosis and management of pediatric obstructive sleep apnea.

METHODS

A two-iterative Delphi method questionnaire was used to formulate expert recommendations by the members of the International Pediatric Otolaryngology Group (IPOG).

RESULTS

Twenty-six members completed the survey. Consensus recommendations (>90% agreement) are formulated for 15 different items related to the clinical evaluation, diagnosis, treatment, postoperative management and follow-up of children with OSA.

CONCLUSION

The recommendations formulated in this IPOG consensus statement may be used along with existing clinical practice guidelines to improve the quality of care and to reduce variation in care for children with OSA.

Therapeutic Positive Airway Pressure Level Predicts Response to Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine whether therapeutic positive airway pressure (PAP) level predicts response to hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) for obstructive sleep apnea using the coprimary outcomes of apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and 4% oxygen desaturation index.

METHODS

Combined cohort study from two US sleep otolaryngology training programs. Subjects were adults with AHI > 15 events/h who underwent HGNS. Eligible subjects had diagnostic preoperative sleep studies, full-night efficacy postoperative studies and therapeutic PAP levels available for analysis. Low and high PAP groups were compared using the t test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients met all inclusion criteria. On average, patients were male, Caucasian, middle-aged, and overweight. Thirteen patients were in the low PAP group (< 8 cm H₂O) and 43 patients in the high PAP group (≥ 8 cm H₂O). Although both groups experienced improvement of polysomnographic measures with HGNS, the low PAP group achieved a significantly larger mean AHI reduction (36.7 ± 22.7 versus 18.4 ± 23.4, P = .02). Additionally, the low PAP group had a greater response rate (defined as AHI < 20 events/h and > 50% reduction of AHI) than the high PAP group (92% versus 44%, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Therapeutic PAP level may aid in the discernment of candidacy for HGNS, with a strong positive predictive value for PAP levels < 8 cm H₂O. A larger prospective study is needed to confirm these findings.

CITATION

Lee CH, Seay EG, Walters BK, Scalzitti NJ, Dedhia RC. Therapeutic positive airway pressure level predicts response to hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2019;15(8):1165-1172.

Pediatric Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy: Technique and Scoring System

Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is an invaluable tool for identifying sites of obstruction for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). During DISE, the patient is in a state of drug-induced sleep, and a flexible laryngoscope is passed through the nose into the upper airway. Sites of obstruction are visualized and scored to guide surgical management. Currently, there is no universally accepted method of DISE analysis and scoring. This limitation in comparability impedes large-scale analysis between clinicians, institutions, and studies. In this report, we propose a standardized method of scoring and performing DISE in children with OSA. Our DISE scoring system is internally developed, consistent through the study, and addresses all levels of potential upper airway obstruction.

A New Technological Advancement of the Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy (DISE) Procedure: The "All in One Glance" Strategy

To illustrate a new technological advance in the standard drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) model, a new machine was used, the Experimental 5 Video Stream System (5VsEs), which is capable of simultaneously visualizing all the decisional parameters on a single monitor, and recording and storing them in a single uneditable video. The DISE procedure was performed on 48 obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) or snoring patients. The parameters simultaneously recorded on a single monitor are (1) the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol (through the target controlled infusion (TCI) pump monitor), (2) the endoscopic upper airway view, (3) the polygraphic pattern, and (4) the level of sedation (through the bispectral index (BIS) value). In parallel to the BIS recording, the middle latency auditory evoked potential (MLAEP) was also recorded and provided. Recorded videos from the 5VsEs machine were re-evaluated six months later by the same clinician and a second clinician to evaluate the concordance of the therapeutic indications between the two. After the six-month period, the same operator confirmed all their clinical decisions for 45 out of 48 videos. Three videos were no longer evaluable for technical reasons, so were excluded from further analysis. The comparison between the two operators showed a complete adherence in 98% of cases. The 5VsEs machine provides a multiparametric evaluation setting, defined as an “all in one glance” strategy, which allows a faster and more effective interpretation of all the simultaneous parameters during the DISE procedure, improving the diagnostic accuracy, and providing a more accurate post-analysis, as well as legal and research advantages.

Dynamic tongue base thickness measured by drug-induced sleep ultrasonography in patients with obstructive sleep apnea

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the value of drug-induced sleep ultrasonography (DISU) for evaluating tongue base thickness (TBT) from the awake state to drug-induced sleep, to further understand the impact of dynamic changes in TBT in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) patients.

METHODS

From May 2017 to May 2018, thirty patients with OSA were prospectively recruited. Sleep was induced with propofol via use of a target-controlled infusion (TCI) system. The depth of sedation was monitored by the bispectral (BIS) index with BIS levels ranging from 50 to 70. The dynamic change in the tongue base from the awake state to drug-induced sleep was recorded. The correlation between TBT in the awake state and in drug-induced sleep with OSA severity was analysed.

RESULTS

The mean TBT in drug-induced sleep was significantly greater than that in the awake state (66.2 ± 4.8 mm vs 61.6 ± 4.6 mm, P < 0.001). TBT in drug-induced sleep was more correlated with AHI compared to TBT in the awake state (r = 0.50 vs r = 0.40). This study showed that TBT in drug-induced sleep had the largest AUC (Area Under the Curve) in the ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristics) analysis (0.875), providing a cut-off point of 63.20 mm with 95% sensitivity for diagnosis of moderate versus severe OSA.

CONCLUSION

Our findings validate the use of DISU in objectively assessing the tongue base collapse in OSA patients. It provides a convenient and non-invasive way to evaluate the upper airway changes in OSA patients in the future.

Success of Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Using Mandibular Advancement During Sleep Endoscopy

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) effectively treats obstructive sleep apnea in select patients. Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is required for HGNS candidacy. Data suggest that mandibular advancement (MA) devices and HGNS share similar target populations. We aimed to test the association between MA's effect on the velum and lateral walls during DISE in relation to the improvement in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) with HGNS.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective case series METHODS: All patients completed preoperative polysomnography or home sleep study, DISE with MA prior to HGNS implantation, and full-night efficacy sleep tests. Adult patients with body mass index (BMI) ≤ 35 and AHI ≥ 15 were included. Two independent reviewers scored DISE videos.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were included from October 2015 to January 2019. Mean BMI (standard deviation) was 28.5 (3.7) kg/m² . Patients with a reduced airway response to MA had greater AHI improvement than patients with a robust response (21.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.4 to 29.0 vs. 4.9, 95% CI: -8.9 to 18.6; P = .03). Patients with complete baseline collapse at the velum and lateral walls (n = 11) had less response compared to those with partial collapse (n = 35) (AHI reduction of 4.4 [95% CI: -8.6 to 17.4] vs. 22.3 [95% CI: 15.1 to 29.6; P = .02]).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients having significant airway improvement in the upper pharynx with MA during DISE appear less likely to succeed with HGNS. This phenomenon might be secondary to the worsened baseline obstruction of the upper pharynx in such patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 2020.

Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy: Evaluation of a Selection Tool for Treatment Modalities for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a very common disorder with important day and nighttime symptoms and long-term effects on health. Different treatment modalities such as positive airway pressure (PAP), oral appliance therapy using custom-made, titratable mandibular advancement devices (MAD), different types of surgery and positional therapy have been introduced over the years, with patient preference and adherence to therapy being key elements in improving treatment outcomes. Several patient selection tools to improve treatment outcomes have been introduced and evaluated over the years. Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is a procedure that provides real-time upper airway evaluation of the sites of flutter and upper airway collapse. This review focuses on the indications and contraindications for DISE, methods of sedation and evaluation, add-on maneuvers, and the results on patient selection and treatment outcomes. A PICO approach was used to clarify the aims of this review. DISE has the advantage of being easily accessible in most ENT practices and being 3-dimensional, dynamic, site specific, safe and it is valuable in selecting patients for upper airway surgery and oral appliance therapy. There is a strong interest for further standardization and exploration of the predictive value of this evolving technique.

Focused transcranial ultrasound for treatment of neurodegenerative dementia

Introduction

Preclinical studies support investigation of focused ultrasound for breakdown of cerebral pathologies in neurodegenerative conditions including Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD).

Methods

A focused transcranial Doppler device with probes (2 MHz, 520 mW/cm²) affixed bilaterally was used to target the hippocampus (AD) or substantia nigra (PD) with functional magnetic resonance imaging navigation for enhanced plaque removal. A total of 22 patients (n = 11 AD, n = 11 PD) underwent 8 consecutive, weekly, 1-hour treatments wherein sleep was encouraged naturally or pharmacologically. Cognitive and motor functioning assessment was carried out using standardized evaluations at baseline and conclusion.

Results

Of all, 62.5% of patients had one or more improved cognitive scores without data incongruence, 87% had stable or improved fine motor scores, and 87.5% had stable or improved gross motor scores. No adverse events were reported.

Discussion

The safety of focused transcranial Doppler and possible enhancement in patient functioning were suggested by outcome data.

Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy: Technique, Indications, Tips and Pitfalls

Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is a diagnostic tool to assess the upper airway of snorers and obstructive sleep apnea patients in conditions that mimic natural sleep. Although DISE appears simple and similar to awake endoscopy, there are many aspects that need to be standardized in order to obtain reliable and reproducible information. In this article, we will recommend how to reliably perform DISE, its indications, and how to obtain and interpret the information of the upper airway.

Dexmedetomidine versus propofol at different sedation depths during drug-induced sleep endoscopy: A randomized trial

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine and propofol on airway dynamics, cardiorespiratory system, and emergence following drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE).

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, single-blinded study.

METHODS

Sixty patients age 18 to 65 years in American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status groups 1 and 2 scheduled to undergo DISE were randomly allocated to either Group P (N = 30; receiving propofol infusion at 50-150 μg/kg/min) or Group D (N = 30; receiving dexmedetomidine bolus of 1 μg/kg followed by infusion at 0.5-1.0 μg/kg/hr). DISE was done at light sleep and deep sleep. Airway obstruction at tongue base was recorded as primary outcome. Airway obstruction at velum, oropharyngeal lateral wall, and epiglottis level during light and deep sedation, hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, time to attain sufficient sedation, time for emergence from sedation, and any adverse events during DISE with the two study drugs were recorded as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

There was a greater degree of obstruction at the tongue base level (P = 0.001) and Oropharynx level (P = 0.017) in Group P compared with Group D during deep sedation. Increase in airway obstruction from light to deep sleep was seen with propofol at the oropharynx (P = 0.0185) and tongue base (P = 0.0108) levels. Two patients (6.6%) in Group D and 10 patients (33.3%) in Group P showed oxygen saturation below the minimum oxygen saturation recorded during polysomnography. Time to open eyes to call after stopping sedation was significantly less in Group P (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Dexmedetomidine shows a lesser degree of airway collapse and higher oxygen saturation levels at greater sedation depth during DISE. Propofol has a faster onset and emergence from sedation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1b Laryngoscope, 130:257-262, 2020.

IMAGES: Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy: An Investigative Tool for Mechanisms of PAP Failure

ABSTRACT

This is a case report of a 60-year-old female with mild obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who presented to CPAP Alternatives clinic following multiple failed attempts at positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy. She underwent drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) with the concurrent application of PAP via two different mask types. Application of the oronasal mask at low pressures demonstrated soft palate collapse, while high pressures resulted in posterior tongue collapse. In contrast, application of the nasal mask eliminated palatal and tongue obstruction at low pressures, despite mask leak at higher pressures. She was recommended a trial of nasal autoPAP, which with the use of a chinstrap, resulted in both subjective and objective improvement of her OSA.

The efficacy of drug induced sleep endoscopy using multimodality monitoring system

Introduction

To overcome the limited readability of the conventional drug induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) system which only records flexible endoscopy images, we devised the Multimodality DISE System (MDS). MDS encompasses the monitoring systems for oxygen saturation, electrocardiogram, blood pressure, snoring intensity, and patient’s position. It enabled to record comprehensive situation of patients who underwent DISE. In this study, we compared the efficacy of MDS with that of the conventional DISE system.

Methods and materials

Ten patients underwent DISE at a tertiary hospital. DISE evaluated the airway of each patient in four positions; supine, supine with jaw thrust, right lateral decubitus, and left lateral decubitus. In addition, every examination was recorded by using both single monitoring system and MDS system. Five otolaryngologists interpreted the recorded examinations without knowledge of patient information (10 conventional DISE and 10 MDS). The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for readability, reading times, ease of patient explanation and the ease of decision making were analyzed.

Results

Mean VAS scores for readability of conventional DISE and MDS were 4.41+2.56 and 8.42+2.07 (p<0.001). Mean reading times for conventional DISE and MDS were 238.80+61.26 sec and 81.00+44.99 sec, respectively (p<0.001). MDS showed superiority in patient communication (p<0.001). MDS was helpful in decision making regarding patients with obstructive sleep apnea (p<0.001).

Conclusions

MDS enhanced the readability of previously recorded DISE and enabled easier doctor-patient communication. In addition, MDS is more effective in decision making regarding patients with OSA. MDS has laid the groundwork for separating the DISE prescriber from the DISE performer.

A Comparative Study on Efficacy and Safety of Propofol versus Dexmedetomidine in Sleep Apnea Patients undergoing Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy: A CONSORT-Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of propofol with dexmedetomidine in patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (SAHS) undergoing drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE). The 88 patients diagnosed with SAHS in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University were randomly allocated into 2 groups (n = 44). Patients in the group dexmedetomidine (group D) received continuous intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg over 15 minutes before the endoscopy, and propofol 2 mg/kg was intravenously administrated in the group propofol (group P). Cardiopulmonary parameters of patients were recorded. The time to fall asleep, duration of endoscopic examination, the wakeup time of patients, the number of mask ventilations for patients, the satisfaction of patients and endoscopic performers, and false positive cases of SAHS of patients were compared between the two groups. Compared with group D, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and blood oxygen saturation (SPO₂) of patients in the P group were lower at the time point of T1 (P < 0.05), the duration of endoscopic examination and wakeup time of patients were obviously prolonged, the incidence of mask ventilation for patients and false positive cases of SAHS of patients was observably higher, and the satisfaction of endoscopic performers was markedly lower, but the time to fall asleep was significantly shortened (P < 0.05). Dexmedetomidine served as a novel sleep induced drug and can provide satisfactory conditions and be safely and effectively applied for endoscopy in patients with SAHS, without adverse hemodynamic effects.

European position paper on drug-induced sleep endoscopy: 2017 Update

BACKGROUND

The first edition of the European position paper (EPP) on drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) was published in 2014 with the aim to standardise the procedure, to provide an in-depth insight into the main aspects of this technique and to have a basis for future research. Since 2014, new studies have been published concerning new sedative agents or new insights into the pattern/levels of the obstruction depending on the depth of sedation. Therefore, an enlarged group of European experts in the field of sleep breathing disorders (SBD), including the most of the first DISE EPP main authors, has decided to publish an update of the European position paper on DISE, in order to include new evidence and to find a common language useful for reporting the findings of this endoscopic evaluation in adult population affected by SBD.

METHODS

The authors have evaluated all the available evidence reported in the literature and have compared experience among various departments in leading European centres in order to provide an update regarding the standardisation of the DISE procedure and an in-depth insight into the main aspects of this technique.

RESULTS

After the first European Position Consensus Meeting on DISE and its update, consensus was confirmed for indications, required preliminary examinations, where to perform DISE, technical equipment required, staffing, local anaesthesia, nasal decongestion, other medications, patient positioning, basics and special diagnostic manoeuvres, drugs and observation windows. So far, no consensus could be reached on a scoring and classification system. However, regarding this aim, the idea of an essential classification, such as VOTE with the possibility of its graded implementation of information and descriptions, seems to be the best way to reach a universal consensus on DISE classification at this stage. A common DISE language is mandatory, and attempts to come to a generally accepted system should be pursued.

Drug-induced sleep endoscopy: from obscure technique to diagnostic tool for assessment of obstructive sleep apnea for surgical interventions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Provide a practical update on drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) for anesthesia providers, which can also serve as a reference for those preparing to establish a DISE program.

RECENT FINDINGS

New developments in surgical approaches to OSA and the growing global incidence of the condition have stimulated increased interest and demand for drug-induced sleep endoscopy. New techniques include transoral robotic surgery and hypoglossal nerve stimulation. Recent DISE literature has sought to address numerous debates including relevance of DISE findings to those during physiologic sleep and the most appropriate depth and type of sedation for DISE. Propofol and dexmedetomidine have supplanted midazolam as the drugs of choice for DISE. Techniques based on pharmacokinetic models of propofol are superior to empiric dosing with regard to risk of respiratory compromise and the reliability of dexmedetomidine to achieve adequate conditions for a complete DISE exam is questionable.

SUMMARY

The role of DISE in surgical evaluation and planning for treatment of OSA continues to develop. Numerous questions as to the optimal anesthetic approach remain unanswered. Multicenter studies that employ a standardized approach using EEG assessment, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling, and objectively defined clinical endpoints will be helpful. There may be benefit to undertaking DISE studies in non-OSA patients.

An updated review of pediatric drug-induced sleep endoscopy

Objectives

Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) involves assessment of the upper airway using a flexible endoscope while patients are in a pharmacologically-induced sleep-like state. The aim of this article is to review the current literature regarding the role of DISE in children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The indications, typical anesthetic protocol, comparison to other diagnostic modalities, scoring systems, and outcomes are discussed.

Methods

A comprehensive review of literature regarding pediatric DISE up through May 2017 was performed.

Results

DISE provides a thorough evaluation of sites of obstruction during sedation. It is typically indicated for children with persistent OSA after tonsillectomy, those with OSA without tonsillar hypertrophy, children with risk factors predisposing then to multiple sites of obstruction, or when sleep-state dependent laryngomalacia is suspected. The dexmedotomidine and ketamine protocol, which replicates non-REM sleep, appears to be safe and is often used for pediatric DISE, although propofol is the most commonly employed agent for DISE in adults. Six different scoring systems (VOTE, SERS, Chan, Bachar, Fishman, Boudewyns) have been used to report pediatric DISE findings, but none is universally accepted.

Conclusions

DISE is a safe and useful technique to assess levels of obstruction in children. There is currently no universally-accepted anesthetic protocol or scoring system for pediatric DISE, but both will be necessary in order to provide a consistent method to report findings, enhance communication among providers and optimize surgical outcomes.

Level of Evidence

N/A.

The effect of preoperative administration of morphine in alleviating intraoperative pain of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy under local anesthesia: A STROBE compliant study

Local anesthesia is routinely recommended for percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED). However, the intense intraoperative pain remains a serious problem. The purpose of the current study is to find a safe and effective method to alleviate the intense pain during PTED for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) under local anesthesia.This study retrospectively analyzed 63 LDH patients who accepted PTED under local anesthesia. Thirty-one patients received intramuscular injection of morphine before PTED, while the other 32 were not. The 10 points visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess the patients' maximum leg and back pain. Patients were asked to grade their experiences of surgery and anesthesia on a 5-point Likert-type scale after the surgery. Modified Mac Nab Criteria were used to evaluate the surgical outcomes after 3-month follow-up.The intraoperative VAS scores of patients who accepted preoperative intervention decreased significantly. The postoperative VAS scores of both groups showed no significance. Patients who received preoperative intervention reported a higher subjective satisfaction rate with the surgery experience. According to the Modified Mac Nab criteria, the surgical outcomes of both groups were similar through the 3-month follow-up. After injection of morphine, 4 patients complained nausea and 2 patients experienced vomiting.Preoperative intramuscular injection of morphine could reduce the patients' pain during the PTED surgery and improve the patients' satisfaction without affecting the surgical outcome. Except for a higher incidence of nausea and vomiting, this method is relatively safe and convenient.

Pharmacologic Considerations for Pediatric Sedation and Anesthesia Outside the Operating Room: A Review for Anesthesia and Non-Anesthesia Providers

Understanding the pharmacologic options for pediatric sedation outside the operating room will allow practitioners to formulate an ideal anesthetic plan, allaying anxiety and achieving optimal immobilization while ensuring rapid and efficient recovery. The authors identified relevant medical literature by searching PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases for English language publications covering a period from 1984 to 2017. Search terms included pediatric anesthesia, pediatric sedation, non-operating room sedation, sedation safety, and pharmacology. As a narrative review of common sedation/anesthesia options, the authors elected to focus on studies, reviews, and case reports that show clinical relevance to modern day sedation/anesthesia practice. A variety of pharmacologic agents are available for sedation/anesthesia in pediatrics, including midazolam, fentanyl, ketamine, dexmedetomidine, etomidate, and propofol. Dosing ranges reported are a combination of what is discussed in the reviewed literature and text books along with personal recommendations based on our own practice. Several reports reveal that ketofol (a combination of ketamine and propofol) is quite popular for short, painful procedures. Fospropofol is a newer-generation propofol that may confer advantages over regular propofol. Remimazolam combines the pharmacologic effects of remifentanil and midazolam. A variety of etomidate derivatives such as methoxycarbonyl-etomidate, carboetomidate, methoxycarbonyl-carboetomidate, and cyclopropyl-methoxycarbonyl metomidate are in development stages. The use of nitrous oxide as a mild sedative, analgesic, and amnestic agent is gaining popularity, especially in the ambulatory setting. Utilizing a dedicated and experienced team to provide sedation enhances safety. Furthermore, limiting sedation plans to single-agent pharmacy appears to be safer than using multi-agent plans.

Anesthetic management for simultaneous drug-induced sleep endoscopy and maxillomandibular advancement in a patient with obstructive sleep apnea

Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is used to identify areas of upper airway obstruction, which occurs when patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) snore. DISE enables effective diagnosis and appropriate treatment of the obstruction site. Among surgical treatment methods for OSA, maxillomandibular advancement surgery (MMA) is performed to move a jaw forward; the surgery has a high success rate for OSA treatment. In DISE, anesthetics such as propofol and midazolam must be administered to induce snoring while the patient is deeply sedated for an accurate diagnosis to be made. When inducing deep sedation in a patient with OSA, airway obstruction may increase, causing oxygen saturation to drop; airway interventions are necessary in such cases. Effective DISE and MMA surgery can be performed by administering propofol through target-controlled infusion while monitoring the bispectral index (BIS).

Dexmedetomidine versus propofol during drug-induced sleep endoscopy and sedation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study is to review the international literature, using a systematic review, for studies comparing propofol and dexmedetomidine for drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) or sedation in which there is a description of the effect of the agents on the upper airway and associated variables (e.g., vital signs, sedation scores).

METHODS

This is a systematic review through October 4, 2016. PubMed/MEDLINE and four additional databases were accessed for this study.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty studies were screened, 79 were downloaded, and 10 met criteria. The majority of the studies identified dexmedetomidine as the preferred pharmacologic agent for DISE due to an overall safer and more stable profile based upon hemodynamic stability. However, propofol provided greater airway obstruction with oxygen desaturations. With either agent, the degree of obstruction in the upper airway lacks some degree of validity as to whether the obstructions accurately represent natural sleep or are simply a drug-induced effect.

CONCLUSION

Dexmedetomidine and propofol have their advantages and disadvantages during DISE. Generally, dexmedetomidine was preferred and seemed to provide a more stable profile based upon cardiopulmonary status. However, propofol has a quicker onset, has a shorter half-life, and can demonstrate larger degrees of obstruction, which might more accurately reflect what happens during REM sleep. Additional research is recommended.

[Drug-induced sedation endoscopy-quo vadis? : Review and outlook]

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced sedation endoscopy (DISE) is a diagnostic procedure which allows evaluation of the collapsibility of the upper airway. According to expert opinion, it is possible to imitate nocturnal collapsibility and perform a realistic investigation of the site of obstruction and vibration. This should enable sufficient and precise therapeutic advice to be given solely on the basis of clinical assessment.

OBJECTIVE

The current publication critically evaluates the present state of development of DISE and its potential indications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A PubMed literature research was performed using "sleep" and "endoscopy" or "DISE" as keywords. Relevant publications were evaluated.

RESULTS

The present publication provides a historical summary of the available publications and relates these to other methods for examining obstructive sleep apnea. The present state of DISE in terms of drugs applied, grading systems, and validity is evaluated. Indications for DISE are described and critically discussed on the basis of literature data.

CONCLUSION

DISE provides deep insights into the genesis of obstructions of the upper airway and snoring. Although its value for diagnosis and treatment of sleep-disordered breathing could not yet be demonstrated for all non-CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) therapies, DISE could identify predictive parameters some methods. Further potential indications for DISE might be predictive examinations for mandibular advancement devices and respiration-synchronous neurostimulation of the hypoglossal nerve. DISE will thus remain a valuable diagnostic tool for obstructive sleep apnea and rhonchopathy.